Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
![](http://earnmoneybangla.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Graduate School Applications: Writing a Research Statement
![how long should research statement be OWL logo](https://owl.purdue.edu/images/logos/owllogo_black.png)
Welcome to the Purdue OWL
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
What is a Research Statement?
A research statement is a short document that provides a brief history of your past research experience, the current state of your research, and the future work you intend to complete.
The research statement is a common component of a potential candidate’s application for post-undergraduate study. This may include applications for graduate programs, post-doctoral fellowships, or faculty positions. The research statement is often the primary way that a committee determines if a candidate’s interests and past experience make them a good fit for their program/institution.
What Should It Look Like?
Research statements are generally one to two single-spaced pages. You should be sure to thoroughly read and follow the length and content requirements for each individual application.
Your research statement should situate your work within the larger context of your field and show how your works contributes to, complicates, or counters other work being done. It should be written for an audience of other professionals in your field.
What Should It Include?
Your statement should start by articulating the broader field that you are working within and the larger question or questions that you are interested in answering. It should then move to articulate your specific interest.
The body of your statement should include a brief history of your past research . What questions did you initially set out to answer in your research project? What did you find? How did it contribute to your field? (i.e. did it lead to academic publications, conferences, or collaborations?). How did your past research propel you forward?
It should also address your present research . What questions are you actively trying to solve? What have you found so far? How are you connecting your research to the larger academic conversation? (i.e. do you have any publications under review, upcoming conferences, or other professional engagements?) What are the larger implications of your work?
Finally, it should describe the future trajectory on which you intend to take your research. What further questions do you want to solve? How do you intend to find answers to these questions? How can the institution to which you are applying help you in that process? What are the broader implications of your potential results?
Note: Make sure that the research project that you propose can be completed at the institution to which you are applying.
Other Considerations:
- What is the primary question that you have tried to address over the course of your academic career? Why is this question important to the field? How has each stage of your work related to that question?
- Include a few specific examples that show your success. What tangible solutions have you found to the question that you were trying to answer? How have your solutions impacted the larger field? Examples can include references to published findings, conference presentations, or other professional involvement.
- Be confident about your skills and abilities. The research statement is your opportunity to sell yourself to an institution. Show that you are self-motivated and passionate about your project.
- Skip to primary navigation
- Skip to main content
- Skip to primary sidebar
- Skip to footer
The Professor Is In
Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers
![how long should research statement be](https://theprofessorisin.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Logo-The-Professor-Is-In-Banner-II-2800-×-969-px-3500-×-1211-px-4000-×-1384-px.png)
Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement
By Karen Kelsky | September 16, 2016
We’ve looked at the Cover Letter and the CV and the Teaching Statement . Today we look at the Research Statement.
An expanded and updated version of this post can now be found in chapter 27 of my book, the professor is in: the essential guide to turning your ph.d. into a job ..
Today, at long last, and in response to popular demand, a post on the Research Statement.
I have, perhaps, procrastinated on blogging about the Research Statement because at some level I felt that the rules might be more variable on this document, particularly with regard to length.
But in truth, they really aren’t.
The RS should be be two pages long for any junior candidate in the humanities or soft social sciences. Two pages allows for an elaboration of the research well beyond the summary in the cover letter that gives the search committee substantial information to work with. Those junior candidates in the hard sciences and fields like Psychology can have 3-4 page research statements.
I strongly urge all job-seekers to investigate the norms of their individual fields carefully, and follow the advice they receive on this matter from experts in their own fields. Just never simply ASSUME that longer is better in an RS or in any job document.
By the way, the RS to which I refer here is the document sometimes requested as part of a basic job application. This is NOT the “research proposal” required by specific fellowship or postdoc applications! Those will specify a length, and should be written to follow the outline I describe in Dr. Karen’s Foolproof Grant Template .) They are a totally different genre of document; don’t confuse the two!
Anyway, back to the RS: there are undoubtedly a number of excellent reasons that people could give for writing a longer RS, based on thoroughness or detail or concerns for accuracy. And I would acknowledge those principles as valid ones.
But they would all come second to the single most important principle of all job market writing, in my view, which is the principle of search committee exhaustion.
Search committee members are exhausted, and they are overwhelmed and distracted. There simply is no bandwidth in their brains or their psyches to handle the amount of material they are required to read, when searches routinely garner between 300 and 1000 applications.
Anything that feels “long” is going to be resented just by virtue of its length. And resentment is categorically what you don’t want a search committee member feeling about your job application materials.
So, in short, the Research Statement, just like the Teaching Statement , needs to be one to two pages in length, single spaced. And like the TS, it needs to be in 11 or 12 point font, and have decent one-inch margins.
What are the other rules? Here they are:
- Print the RS on regular printer paper. Do not use letterhead for this or the TS, and do not use any special high grade paper.
- Put your name and the words “Research Statement” centered at the top.
- If unsure how to structure, use a 5-paragraph model as follows:
[… edited… ]
Here are some additional principles:
- A RS (like a TS) is not tailored to a school overtly. While you may subtly adjust your project descriptions to speak to a specific type of job, you do not refer to any job or department or application in the statement itself.
- Do not refer to any other job documents in the RS (ie, “As you can see from my CV, I have published extensively….”)
- As in all job documents, remain strictly at the level of the evidentiary. State what you did, what you concluded, what you published, and why it matters for your discipline, period. Do not editorialize or make grandiose claims (“this research is of critical importance to…”).
- Do not waste precious document real estate on what other scholars have NOT done. Never go negative. Stay entirely in the realm of what you did, not what others didn’t.
- Do not position yourself as “extending” or “adding to” or “building off of” or … [what follows is edited…]
- Do not refer to other faculty or scholars in the document. The work is your own. If you co-authored a piece…
- Do not refer to yourself as studying “under” anybody…
- Do not forget to articulate the core argument of your research. I am astounded at how often (probably in about 80% of client documents) I have to remind clients to …
- Give a sense of a publishing trajectory, moving from past to present…
- Make sure you are not coming across as a one-trick pony. The second major project must be clearly distinct …
- Use the active voice as much as possible, but beware a continual reliance on “I-Statements”, as I describe in this post, The Golden Rule of the Research Statement.
I will stop here. Readers, please feel free to add more in the comments. I will add to this post as further refinements come to mind.
Similar Posts:
- This Christmas, Don’t Be Cheap
- The Dreaded Teaching Statement: Eight Pitfalls
- What is Evidence of Teaching Excellence?
- The Golden Rule of the Research Statement
- How Do I Address Search Committee Members?
Reader Interactions
August 30, 2012 at 12:38 pm
I am interested in applying for Ph.D programs in the UK and they ask for a Research Proposal…is this the same thing as a Research Statement?
August 30, 2012 at 12:59 pm
No, they are looking for what you might think of as a research protocol, so literally your background, literature review, hypotheses and methods. You would need to convey how this is a unique area of research that is novel and adds to the existing literature; they are assessing the novelty of your research and how you would conduct the study. PhD programs in the UK are heavily researched based; you would need to show that you could literally hit the ground running to do your PhD. A major difference is that UK PhD’s usually take 3-4 years full-time and this is stringently enforced. I have a PhD from the UK and there are obviously pros and cons compared to the US system but you need to be a confident researcher if you’re planning to take that route.
August 30, 2012 at 1:28 pm
No: a Research Proposal is intended as a pitch for a specific project, or the research programme you will undertake within a specific timeframe (such as a PhD or a post-doc). A Research Statement is used for applications for jobs and occasionally fellowships, and outlines the research you have *already* completed, and what you plan to pursue next. So your Research Statement will describe your doctoral thesis as a finished (or very nearly finished) product, and list the publications generated by your doctoral work and any subsequent projects.
August 30, 2012 at 2:12 pm
No, a research proposal is a description of what you would like to do for you PhD research. Essentially an outline of your expected PhD thesis (which can of course change later once you’ve been accepted and started working on your research) with a short lit review, an identification of a research gap that you plan to address and a brief outline of proposed methods.
August 30, 2012 at 12:46 pm
What about in the case where you are asked to provide a “Teaching and Research Statement” in addition to a statement of your teaching philosophy? I have gone for a one page statement which focuses on my research but links that to my teaching so as not to repeat too much from my philosophy or my cover letter. Any thoughts from others?
August 30, 2012 at 5:02 pm
I’m preparing a “Teaching and Research Statement” and have kept it at 2 pages (1 page for teaching and 1 for research). Do others think that’s OK? If it’s 1 page total, for both teaching and research, then how much could I really say? That’s so short, less room than a 2-page cover letter.
September 1, 2012 at 9:05 am
Yes, on occasions where jobs ask for that combined statement, I always work with clients to do a two page document, with one page devoted to each part.
September 20, 2017 at 10:09 am
Found the blog this week… I wish I found sooner!! Gongrats! One add-on question: in the case of a combined document, would you start with the RS and then TS, or it doesn’t make much difference?
September 21, 2017 at 9:56 am
I’d start with RS in general, but it would depend on the job – teaching-centric jobs would be the reverse.
September 16, 2021 at 7:13 pm
Hello, so glad I found your blog! The application I am putting together requests a statement of research philosophy, a teaching philosophy, and a combined research and teaching interests statement. In this case, would one page combined be sufficient with a much briefer review of interests in each area (given that so much more detail is available in the philosophy statements)?
August 30, 2012 at 1:21 pm
In my field in R1 jobs it is pretty rare that one is asked to prepare a research statement. This stuff does in the cover letter. Any insight into when one is asked for this?
August 30, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Field dependent, but as KK points out, you should have a research paragraph (or two) in your cover letter anyway…
August 30, 2012 at 1:26 pm
The above echoes my experience. One obvious caveat would be postdocs and such that either stipulate a longer statement length (the ol’ two page Fulbright IIE style), or suggest a wider range of material should be included.
August 30, 2012 at 2:50 pm
Thanks for the tips – a very useful post! How do these apply to postdoc applications?
– If the required length of the research statement is not stipulated, would one page also be sufficient for a postdoc application?
– Also, what is the convention for naming (with title) your advisor in the cover letter – should this also be avoided?
August 30, 2012 at 1:30 pm
In terms of the 5-paragraph model, where would you include subsequent projects, i.e if you are on your second or third post-doc. Do you give equal time/space to each project you have completed, or just the basic run-down and focus more on current or upcoming work?
August 30, 2012 at 3:46 pm
This is a good question. If you’re well beyond the diss, then you will use the “diss” para to describe your most important recent research, then at the end of that para or in the next one, indicate with a sentence or two the research that preceded it (demonstrating an organic connection between them if possible), with a major publication or two. And then from that, move to the next major project. So it’s a bit more of a zig zag, with the past sandwiched between (and subordinate to) the present and the future.
August 30, 2012 at 3:47 pm
Let me respond in a different way. if you are a senior scholar applying for an associate or full position, then your RS may certainly be longer than one page (although I’d cap it at two, myself). The one page rule applies most to those who are seeking their first or second assistant professor position.
August 30, 2012 at 4:10 pm
Where is the appropriate place to highlight (solo or lead-author) publications developed outside of your dissertation work? For example, a secondary area of inquiry that runs tangential to your core area of research.
September 1, 2012 at 9:08 am
That can get another paragraph. Now, this is tricky. If you have an *extensive* secondary body of work for whatever reason then in that case, you may be one of the people who can go onto two pages. This is rare—most job seekers just have their diss, its pubs, and a planned second project, and that can all go on one page. If you have a small body of secondary research, that can also still fit on one page. So the judgment call comes in knowing how much is “too much” to legitimately fit on one page. Questions like that are what people hire me for!
August 30, 2012 at 5:07 pm
I’m wondering about repeating myself. The 5-paragraph format for the research statement is very similar to the format for the cover letter. So should we more briefly discuss points we’ve fleshed out in the cover letter, to save the space for points that are not in the cover letter? Or is repeating the info in the research statement and cover letter OK/expected? (If you’re repeating yourself, then there’s the issue of figuring out X different ways to say the same thing.)
I answer this in another response, but basically you have the space here to go into far more detail about the scholarship itself—the methods, the theoretical orientation, a very brief and edited literature context, and a strong statement of contribution to the discipline. You can give chapter summaries of about one sentence each, and you can also describe the publications in a sentence or two (not possible in the job letter). And the biggest thing in the RS is the description of the second project. The cover letter devotes a very short paragraph to that, of approximately 2-3 sentences, but in the RS, it can get a full-sized paragraph.
January 21, 2020 at 1:11 pm
This is a very delayed response, but I’m hoping you still get the notification! I want to make sure that it’s appropriate to cite specific authors in describing the lit context. Thank you much!
August 30, 2012 at 7:30 pm
I struggle with para. 4 because I have 3 major post-diss projects in mind. 2 are off-shoots of the diss. material in the sense that they contribute to the same field as my diss. but look at very different aspects than my diss. covered. The 3rd project is a completely different trajectory with little-no connection to my diss. I fear it sounds “out of left field” as they say, but it’s my dream-project. So I’m not sure how to communicate all of these interests. Thoughts?
September 1, 2012 at 9:12 am
This is a huge question, and one that I’m going to edit the post to include. It is critical that no job seeker propose more than one next project. This may seem counter-intuitive. Surely, the more ideas I have, the more intellectually dynamic I look, right? Wrong. Anything above one major post-diss project makes you look scattered and at risk in your eventual tenure case. A tenure case requires a clear and linear trajectory from the diss, its pubs, to a second project, and its pubs.
Now, I hasten to add that this rule applies most firmly in the humanities and humanistically inclined social sciences. In the hard sciences, and experimental or lab-based social sciences, the rhythm of research and publishing is different and different rules might possibly apply, with a larger number of smaller-scale projects possible. But in book fields, you need to do one book…and then a second book…for tenure.
September 4, 2012 at 9:49 am
thanks Karen, I will keep this in mind
October 22, 2016 at 9:01 am
Do you know of a source for more information about this problem from the hard sciences and engineering perspective?
August 30, 2012 at 10:02 pm
In a research proposal (i.e., for a specific postdoc), what is the appropriate length of time for revising a dissertation for publication? My instinct is, for a 3-year program, to devote 2 years to revision/publication, and one year to the new research project. Is this too slow, too fast, too hot, too cold, or just right?
September 1, 2012 at 9:00 am
To my mind that is exactly right. However, I know of a major Ivy League 3-year fellowship that expects 3 years to be spent on the first book. I find that baffling. As a postdoc you have few teaching obligations and almost no committee/service work….why would it require three years to transform your diss to a book in that environment? This particular app does allow you to *optionally* propose a second project for the third year, and I recommend that all applicants do that.
August 30, 2012 at 10:07 pm
Karen, thanks for this and all of your other helpful posts. I’m a sociology phd student at a top department, and served on the hiring committee last year. Not a single applicant made it onto our short list (or even the “semifinalist” list of 30 candidates) with less than a 2 page research statement (and most were 2.5-3 pages). Maybe my institution is unique, or maybe they were poorly written and not as detailed as they could have been in one page. But I just wanted to share my experience for any sociologists reading this blog.
September 1, 2012 at 9:01 am
That’s interesting. That would seem to be fetishizing length qua length…. the work can be described in one page when the one page is well written.
September 4, 2012 at 7:45 am
I’m in a top psychology program, and I echo this– I have read many research statements for short-listed candidates in my department, and I have never seen a research statement shorter than two pages, and typically they are three or four.
September 5, 2012 at 10:27 am
I crowd sourced the question on FB and most responses said they favor a one page version. I suppose this could be a field specific thing. The humanities are def. one page. It strikes me that social sciences and psych in particular might be tending toward longer. I really wouldn’t recommend more than two though.
September 17, 2013 at 8:58 am
I am writing my own R.S. and have asked for copies from colleagues in both psychology and the life sciences. In all cases, the R.S. has been at least 4 pages. So, it doesn’t seem specific to just the social sciences. Maybe it’s a difference in the prestige of the universities, with R-1 preferring lengthier research statements, while liberal arts universities prefer a smaller research statement. Most candidates at R-1s also have lengthier C.V.s which would imply a longer R.S. no?
September 17, 2013 at 9:48 pm
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 pm
I’d seen a lot of recommendations online for RSs to have a hard limit of either one or two pages. When I asked my own (Education) professors about it, they said that two pages sounded short and that they’d seen everything from one page to ten pages but recommended keeping it no longer than 3-4. Right now mine is 2.5 pages.
August 30, 2012 at 10:24 pm
Thanks for this really helpful post! A few quick quick follow up questions that I’m sure may benefit others who have similar concerns. 1. As we situate our dissertation research within our fields (paragraph 2/3) does this mean we have license to use field-specific vocabulary or theoretical language? (as opposed to the cover letter, where we’re writing in a much more accessible voice?) 2. Also, many of the items in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th paragraphs you suggest would seem to overlap quite extensively with the cover letter, making it hard to properly differentiate what goes where. For schools that require this statement, should we just strip down our cover letter and include some of these details in our research statement? Or, is there something I’m missing? And finally, 3. A bit of a mega-question, but what is the *point* of a research statement? Why do some schools have them? Understanding the reasons some departments request it would be helpful, especially in differentiating from the cover letter. Sincerely, Grad-student-on-the-market
September 1, 2012 at 8:58 am
Never strip down the cover letter. That is the document that opens the door for the reading of the other docs such as TS and RS. The distinction of the RS is that it can be more field-specific and far more detailed than what you can provide in the single para devoted to the research in the job letter. You can also situate the research vis-a-vis scholarship in the field (carefully and within limits, remembering the rules that the work described is YOUR OWN, and never to devote precious real estate to what OTHER PEOPLE have or have not done).
You can also briefly sketch the chapters of the dissertation as long as you give no more than about one sentence per chapter. One of the most tedious pitfalls of the RS is the exhaustive chapter-by-chapter description of the diss.
And re #3: that’s a great question. What IS the point? Basically, if the cover letter and CV open the door to your candidacy for the very first cut in a search comm member’s mind (say, from 500 to 100), then the RS gives more detailed indication that are a hard-hitting scholar with a sophisticated research program and a body of dense scholarship that will yield the publications you need for tenure, and also answer the question more clearly as to your fit for the job and for the department.
August 31, 2012 at 9:32 am
Is the Research statement the same as the diss abstract? My field seems to consistently ask for diss abstract and all the examples I have seen are two pages, with page one being a discussion of the project, it’s contributions, etc. and the second being ch descriptions.
August 31, 2012 at 12:05 pm
No, the diss abs. is an abstract of the diss! Common in English.
November 2, 2012 at 11:26 am
thanks for making this distinction. is there a length limit on the diss abstract?
September 1, 2012 at 12:08 pm
I’m in a STEM field and would disagree with limiting the RS to 1 page. Most research statements that I have seen (for searches at R1 schools) have been 2-3 pages. One aspect of this which may be different in STEM fields compared to social sciences/humanities is that in STEM you really should include between 1 and 3 figures in the research statement. We like data and we want to see yours. My research statements always included at least two figures – one from published work and one from a cool new result that wasn’t yet published (but was either in review or accepted but not in press, making it hard to scoop). Depending on the school I also sometimes included a picture of a cool method (it’s a pretty pic too) – that was typically done for SLAC apps where I was also making the point that I would be able to involve their students in that research. With figures that are actually readable, there is no way to get away with less than 2-3 pages for a research statement. Again I think this may be STEM specific but given how scientists read journals – most folks go straight to the figures and then later look at the text – this is probably a good tactic in those fields.
September 4, 2012 at 12:21 pm
I love the idea that a research statement could include figures. I’ve never seen one like this (I’m in biological anthropology) and have never thought this would be something that could be included.
September 5, 2012 at 10:25 am
In the hard sciences this is not uncommon.
September 1, 2012 at 4:33 pm
Forgive me for bringing up/asking the perhaps obvious. So no master’s thesis mention?
Also, you mention not providing two second projects. Would that still apply if one is far-away foreign, and the other local?
September 4, 2012 at 9:43 am
Another question on the MA – mine was empirical research published in a general science journal (Proc B) so I definitely need to mention it. But my question is whether I should explicitly say that this was my MA project?
I’m entering the job market ABD.
September 5, 2012 at 10:26 am
avoid framing yourself as a student, particularly MA.
September 4, 2012 at 9:32 am
I’d say, especially for humanities fields, the “baseline” of 1 page single-spaced that Karen mentions is correct. As she says in the post, there are obvious exceptions (STEM might want more, specific jobs might want more), but assuming 1 page without any other specific information is a good standard rule. In fact, from my own experience, 1 page generally works for any document that isn’t your vitae or your job letter.
The reason I say this is because you basically want to make a good impression pretty quickly. Job committees have limited time, and they are probably going to scan your document before deciding whether it is worth reading it in full. I’d also suggest reading up on document design, and making your documents easy to scan by putting in effective headers that give a powerful overall impression of your candidacy. You should also design those headers to lure your readers to look at your work more closely.
September 4, 2012 at 12:04 pm
I’m going through the process right now as an ABD, following advice from many quarters including TPII and a number of junior and senior faculty in top departments in my field. I have collected sample statements from 5 successful candidates and they are all in the 3-5 page range, closer to what the sociologist above describes. I have not seen a single statement at one page.
September 4, 2012 at 6:23 pm
When proposing future research, do you still recommend we avoid stating what others have NOT done? Can these types of statements, “yet others have not yet address xxx and yyy”, be helpful in justifying the need for our proposed topic?
It is always good to indicate, rather briskly, “in contrast to other work that has emphasized xxx…” or “no studies to date have examined xxxx.” What I am cautioning against is the very common temptation among young candidates to harp on and on about other scholars’ shortcomings, or how their diss topic is “badly understudied” (a phrase I’d give my right hand never to have to read again). Can the self-righteousness and just describe your work and its contribution.
September 7, 2012 at 12:54 pm
thanks for the post!
I had a question about not giving the sense that one is “extending” past work. As you say in this post: “Avoid the temptation to describe how you will “continue” or “extend” your previous research topics or approaches.”
In my case, my book will be comprised of about half new material and half dissertation research. “Extending” feels like an accurate word to describe the relationship between the diss and the book. Like, ‘Extending my diss research on xxx, the book offers new ways of thinking about issues yyy and zzz. …’
So is this the wrong way to describe the relationship between book and diss (even if it seems accurate?) What are *good* ways to talk about the relationship between the two when the book really does “build on” groundwork laid in the diss?
September 7, 2012 at 2:45 pm
This question actually requires a blog post on its own. There is a weird fixation among job seekers on the word ‘extend.” I don’t get it, and find it mystifying and irritating. Of course books or second projects will typically have some organic connection to the diss. But the insistence on saying that they “extend” the diss makes the DISS primary, and the new work secondary. But on the job market and in your career, the diss must NOT be primary. The diss is something a grad student writes. You are not applying to be a grad student. You are applying to be professor. So it’s the new material that should have primacy. Yet young job seekers are so myopically fixated on their diss that all they ever do is harp on and on about how every single damned thing they’re going to do next is basically a reworking of the diss material. Yuck! Who wants that?
As you can see, I am a bit reactive at this point…
September 7, 2012 at 2:53 pm
ok! I hear you saying that it is more about not giving the sense, throughout the letter, that the book is a mere “extension” of the dissertation, and that typically this word is overused by applicants and thus gives that impression. That makes sense. Personally, the sentence I noted above about is my only reference to the diss–the rest is all about the book and future project since I’m a postdoc and the diss is really in the past. 🙂 thanks!
September 15, 2012 at 7:19 pm
Thanks for the helpful guidelines, Karen!
How would you recommend shifting the focus of the paragraphs for those of us going on the market as postdocs? For me, I’ll have completed 2 years of a postdoc in Education, and so I have many new projects more relevant to my future research than my dissertation was. However, except for a few conference proceedings, I have no publications on my postdoc research yet. In fact, some of my proposed “new” research will be to continue what I began in my postdoctoc. Do hiring committees look down upon this?
Thanks for your advice!
September 22, 2012 at 5:58 am
Does anyone here know if this is an effective format for British Oxbridge postdocs as well? I’m finishing a UK PhD and pretty keen to stay in the country, and obviously these are madly competitive. I know my research is good, but the eternal question of how to make anything in the humanities sound important to other people, you know?
October 13, 2012 at 5:31 pm
Please tag this post so that it appears under the teaching and research statement category!
October 13, 2012 at 9:05 pm
October 29, 2012 at 4:38 pm
Karen: “Just never simply ASSUME that longer is better in an RS or in any job document”
Yours Truly: “Just never simply ASSUME that they are going to read what you write. Often they a long CV, RS, and list of publications to tick all the boxes and cover their backs.”
November 20, 2012 at 1:35 pm
If I consider teaching and curriculum development part of my research, is it okay to mention this in the RS–specifically if written for a university more focused on teaching than research? My assumption is that R1 schools would look down on this…?
November 20, 2012 at 2:56 pm
Unless you’re in the field of education, you can’t include teaching or curric. in a RS.
December 16, 2012 at 11:44 pm
Than you very much Karen. A valuable guide
December 31, 2012 at 7:37 pm
Does the rule of no more than one future project description apply to the field of developmental psychology?
*Please delete above post with my full name, I did not realize it would post
January 1, 2013 at 9:35 am
You would need to investigate that among your profs and colleagues. I don’t know the expectations of all fields well enough to advise.
September 18, 2013 at 4:10 pm
I wrote a research statement and asked a friend in my department look at it. She said I should include a paragraph on collaborative work I’ve done as well. The problem is that all of my “collaborative” work is really “assistance”. I do not want to frame myself as a graduate student, but I also see the value in highlighting my ability to produce scholarship with other people. Any thoughts on this, Karen or others?
September 27, 2013 at 8:37 pm
Many thanks! I searched through a tone of sites for samples and examples, but yours is the most helpful.
September 29, 2013 at 7:32 am
Does one use references and include a reference list in a research statement?
October 24, 2013 at 10:40 am
I’d like to know the answer to this question, too.
Karen’s advise (Do not refer to other faculty or scholars in the document. The work is your own. If you co-authored a piece, do not use the name of the co-author. Simply write, “I have a co-authored essay in the Journal of XXX.”) sounds like you shouldn’t, but I personally see more advantages (that’s what scholars are used to, you can reference one paper multiple times without much space, you give the full information of your papers) then disadvantages (mention other authors).
So some remarks on using reference lists/bibliographies would be really interesting.
October 11, 2013 at 2:17 pm
You mention that P4 should include: “A summary of the next research project, providing a topic, methods, a theoretical orientation, and brief statement of contribution to your field or fields.”
How specific do you need to get with that information? I want the review committees to see that I have good, viable ideas for future research, but at the same time I’m worried that by giving too many details my ideas are liable to get stolen…not to mention that more detail means a lot more space on the document and I’m already finding it really hard to keep it to 2 pages even just using pretty general info. All the example research statements from my field that I’m reading make generalized statements like, “This area of my research will focus on developing and characterizing the structure of smart multifunctional materials for infrastructure applications,” but that just doesn’t seem like enough…
Thanks for the advice! Your blog has been so valuable as I am preparing my application package. 🙂
October 24, 2013 at 8:52 am
Hi Karen, I am applying for a few Phd positions & programs around the world, and some programs ask for a research statement, some for a statement of purpose. I fell Ill during my master’s studies and it had impacted my studies to the point of taking a leave of absence(and is known by my referees). As I understand, I can mention that in a SOP, but not in a research statement. Is there anyway I can communicate to the admissions committee about my situation (within the scope of my application) ?
October 30, 2013 at 7:13 am
Hello, Karen, I am an old follower returning. In a research statement, do you give considerably less space to what is already published, books and articles, and much more space and detail to describe projects(s) in progress or about to be launched as research proposal applications?
October 31, 2013 at 7:32 am
I recommend balancing about half and half; in the case of very young/junior candidates, though, the previous/current stuff is going to far outweigh the future stuff.
November 6, 2013 at 12:32 am
I am applying to an R1 and part of the app package asks for a “statement of research interests”. it sounds self-evident, but this is different from a research statement, right? They are, in fact, wanting to know what my future research projects are, to ascertain if i am a good prospect, correct?
Many thanks, Karen and co.!!!
November 8, 2013 at 10:40 am
No. it’s the same thing.
November 8, 2013 at 2:35 pm
Hi, I am applying to graduate school, and some programs ask for a research statement. I have not done any independent research, but have worked in a lab under a postdoc for three years. As a undergrad, is it okay to refer to the postdoc by name and say that I was assisting? Should this be structured any differently than the model you gave above? Thanks!
January 20, 2014 at 5:02 am
I’m applying for a PhD scholarship and I’m required to write a research statement. Is there any different format for a PhD student to be or just follow the same as per above?
Thanks a lot!
February 7, 2014 at 10:58 am
Hi, Could you please let me know if it is proper to mention some of projects in a certain master course that one took? I asked this because I am applying for a position that almost there is not a direct relation between my master thesis and my prospective PhD supervisor’s research interests. Thank you in advance.
February 21, 2014 at 11:23 pm
If some of your research background was for a government agency and your results went to government documents and forms, are you allowed to include it in your research statement. For example, I am applying for a job that calls for a research statement in which I would be designing stream sampling plans and in the past I worked for state government designing and implementing SOPs for stream sampling and EPA reports. This experience is much more applicable to the job than my dissertation research is. In other words, is the RS more to show I can do research and think like a researcher or that I have done similar research in the past?
March 6, 2014 at 10:00 am
Hi, This post has been really helpful to me. I have a question about citations in a research statement. Should I cite relevant or seminal studies? Or is a research statement assumed to be written out of the authors own confidence, experience, and general knowledge of their field of study? If yes to citations, is there an optimal amount? Thank you!
April 26, 2014 at 11:01 am
I dont understand why I cannot name who I collaborated with, or worked with and claim complete ownership. Most of all disseration ideas comes out of a collaborative effort. Seems kinda lame to suddenly act like every idea is all mine without giving due credit.
April 26, 2014 at 12:00 pm
it’s not claiming ownership. It’s focusing on the work that YOU did as part of the project and not dispersing attention to other scholars, in this particular document.
April 28, 2014 at 10:09 am
I disagree. All of your recommendations are valid except for this one. In science and engineering, almost all dissertation work is collaborative; that’s how it works, either through industry applications, a reagent or mathematical technique, opportunity to apply theory to projects etc. Of course, the student has to compe up with the research questions and hypothesis and methodologies but it is very rare for one lab to have everything that the student needs in-house and even rarer for the work to be done in complete isolation (you don’t see that many two author papers in STEM fields these days). Including names of other people would actually be a good thing as it shows a willingness to interact and collaborate with a diverse set of people, picking up new skills and perspectives; this is how science is done these days. Of course the research thrust should be from the individual, but that is like a given.
October 26, 2014 at 8:00 pm
I am also in a STEM field, and all of my research has been collaborative to one degree or another. In my tenure-track applications last year, I mainly phrased my research statement to say that I work with YYY group on YYY, lead studies of ZZZ within the ZZZ Collaboration, and so on. I didn’t get any interviews.
This year I received some feedback from a new letter writer (and current collaborator), who thought that last year’s statement made it hard for outsiders to tell what specific ideas I had and what I specifically did about those ideas. When I rewrote my research statement to focus on those issues this year, I ended up with a stronger document that didn’t need to mention my collaborators at all — not because I tried to claim credit for everything, but because I wrote about my own contributions rather than the corporate identity.
Since jobs go to individuals and not corporations, I am strongly inclined to agree with Karen’s advice, even for STEM fields. In fact, it may be even more important for those of us with highly collaborative research to discuss our own contributions and leave our colleagues out of our research statements. The CV/publication list makes it clear that we interact and collaborate with others. The difficulty is to demonstrate what I actually did as author #13 (in alphabetical order) that makes me actually worth hiring.
April 29, 2014 at 5:03 am
Dear Karen, I am applying for a faculty position and have been asked to provide along with the usual CV and cover letter “Research Program Plan” and “Teaching philosophy”. Could you please or anyone inform me if the “Research Program Plan”is the same as the RS or a detailed research proposal? Additionally, should I include in the teaching philosophy an experience in my undergraduate that has shaped my teaching philosophy? Finally, should my TP include any courses ever taught or course proposals? Your candid response will be appreciated. Thanks
April 29, 2014 at 8:00 am
The RPP is the same as a RS. Please read all my posts on the Teaching Statement for more on that—do NOT include your undergrad experiences. Check out my column in Chronicle Vitae for more on that question–it’s the column on how to apply to a Small Liberal Arts College (SLAC) job.
July 16, 2014 at 3:39 am
Dear Karen, I am applying for a postdoc position in Spain and have been asked to provide along with CV and references, a “cover letter with a description of research accomplishments and statement of overall scientific goals and interests (approximately 1000 words)”. This messes up the usual structure I have in mind. What do you suggest? Two different files or a hybrid between them in one file? thanks
September 17, 2014 at 1:12 pm
Hi Dr. Karen,
I just wanted to say thanks for such an awesome article and the pointers.
Cheers Sajesh
October 13, 2014 at 4:15 pm
I am a bit confused about what a “statement of previous researc” looks like. Any insights?
October 14, 2014 at 12:59 pm
basically this RS doc, without anything about future research.
October 22, 2014 at 5:49 pm
I’m applying for a tenure track position in Strategic Management but my dissertation was on a topic related to my field, pharmaceuticals. How do I craft a RS if I really haven’t thought about future research in topics related to management but my teaching experience and work experience (line management) is directly related to management/leadership?
October 27, 2014 at 12:38 pm
Hi, Dr. Karen,
I’m applying for tenure-track positions in Computer Science. My current research focus (and for the last year and a half in my postdoc) has been in “data science”, primarily applied to biology; my dissertation work was in computational biology. I don’t want to focus on the biology aspect; I see this research being more broadly applicable. I also have significant industry experience from before my PhD; I spent 6 years doing work that was very relevant to this field of data science (in finance and in global trade), and I’d like to tie that industry work into my research statement. What do you think about this? Some have told me I should just talk about my postdoctoral research, while others have said the industry experience, since it’s very relevant, makes me a stronger candidate and I should tie it and my dissertation work into my postdoc and future research.
What are your thoughts? Thanks!
October 31, 2014 at 7:41 am
I am a young scholar in Communication. My research plan includes a description of past and current research projects (dissertation + 4 subsequent projects) and a description of short and long term projects (work in progress and three major research projects I want to undertake). I have been told this is not enough and I need more projects in my proposal. Only 2 pages for so many projects (including a detailed timeline) does not seem feasible.
November 3, 2014 at 7:50 pm
Dear Dr. Karen, First, let me thank you for your website. I’ve been reading it carefully the past few weeks, and I’ve found it very informative and helpful. I’m in something of a unique situation, so I’m not sure how to best make use of your advice on the RS, which seems aimed at newly minted PhDs. I have been in my current position, teaching at a community college, since 1997. During this time, I completed my doctorate (awarded in 2008). I taught abroad on a Fulbright scholarship in 2010-11, and during that time revised and expanded my dissertation for publication (this included contextual updates and one complete new chapter). I was fortunate enough to get a contract, and the book appeared in 2012; the paperback is coming out this month. Given my experiences, I want to make the move to a 4-year institution, if possible (I realize the odds are slim). A few of the ads I’m looking at are asking for a research statement. So, how do I best handle my circumstance in the RS? The dissertation and book are largely the same. Where should I provide the detailed description of my project and the chapter summaries (as you’ve recommended)? How can I avoid redundancies? Your advice is appreciated.
November 5, 2014 at 3:02 am
Dear Dr Karen,
I have read parts of your blog with great interest .. I need some advice.. if you have a research statement where one is combining two different streams of research, is this generally a good idea or would it be better to have a single stream? At the moment mine RS is nearly 4 pages (I have a short 3 page version of this).
Can you also give advice about an “academic plan” is this simply the 1-2 page “teaching statement”? Do yo have pointers/advice for this?
best regards,
November 9, 2014 at 10:50 am
Greetings Dr. Karen, hope this message finds you well.
I am applying for my first post-doc fresh out of my PhD. But I also did a Master’s prior to my PhD which resulted in publications and a thesis. That being said, do you think I should add my Master’s research to my research statement? I planned on putting it just above my PhD research. Thanks a lot 🙂
November 10, 2014 at 11:46 am
I’m wondering if it’s acceptable to mention personal qualities in an RS, such as being a collaborative worker or being able to acquire new skills rapidly (with concrete examples, that is). Normally I would put that in a cover letter, but it seems that cover letters are a thing of the past.
November 10, 2014 at 10:01 pm
No, that is not the place for that. Really, no part of the academic job application is the place for that.
November 19, 2014 at 6:47 am
Dear Karen, a special question… how do your rules above changing when writing a research statement for someone who has 4+years of AP experience and tons of research after dissertation?
Yours and other suggestions seem to be from the point of view of a grad/post-grad. Need some good insight/advise on how to to tailor a description of your research that spans many different threads and is perhaps quite a bit different from your dissertation.
November 26, 2014 at 9:51 pm
Dear Karen,
Thank you for this useful post. What about career goals? Does one mention those in the research statement or cover letter, if at all? For example, for NIH career development awards one has to write a one-page personal statement that includes career and research goals. The two are often aligned.
More specific, can /should one say things along the lines of: “My primary career goal is to become a successful independent investigator focused on xxx research.” or “I plan to secure a faculty position at a major university or research institute where I can engage in cutting edge research on xxx.”
Thank you for your insights.
Best regards,
November 27, 2014 at 9:19 am
This is more industry/business talk and not typical for academia. If you are articulating a complex research and teaching plan, it is UNDERSTOOD that you’re aiming for an academic career.
November 30, 2014 at 9:58 am
Dear Prof Karen Greeting, hope this greeting finds you well I have read this blog with great interest…In my opinion, writing teaching and research statements are very difficult than writing a PhD research… For your info that I have finished my PhD research with 17 publications in 2 years and 4 months and since that time (2 years)still writing my research statement and not finish yet..
November 30, 2014 at 10:13 pm
Thank you for your reply! Leaving this out will save me a lot of space. Best regards
January 14, 2015 at 11:17 am
I am applying for a grad program in engineering and the university requires me to write a research statement. I have no prior research experience nor have I thought about any topics for research. How do I approach this problem?
January 14, 2015 at 2:29 pm
I’m sorry, I don’t provide advice on applications to grad programs.
January 16, 2015 at 1:07 am
Okay, thank you.
January 23, 2015 at 11:33 pm
Hi, can I cite a reference in statement of research interests for a postdoctoral position? If so, do I include the reference of the citation at the bottom of the page? Also, do I title my statement of research interests page as ” statement of research interests”? Thank you.
February 4, 2015 at 10:18 am
I am applying for a 1 yr postdoc in the social science and humanities. The initial position is offered for one year with a possibility of renewal for up to one more year.
My plan is to use the postdoc opportunity to convert my dissertation into a book manuscript. I have a 2 yr plan which i believe is realistic. Roughly first yr review expand literature, reassess chapters, conduct addition interviews to build on insights. The second year would be analysis of data and writing and revising. How do I reduce this to a yr? Or do I propose it as a two yr endeavor?
February 5, 2015 at 9:39 am
to be blunt, you should skip the expanding of the literature, the reassessing, and the additional interviews. Things like this are what delay books. Transform your diss into a book mss with a one-year writing plan, and submit it for publication by the end of that year. Early in the year (or before you arrive) you send out proposals for advance contracts. This is what makes for a competitive postdoc app.
February 27, 2015 at 9:31 am
Thanks for your post. I am writing my RS with your comments as my reference. However, I have some concerns and wish you could offer some suggestions.
You mentioned that when writing RS, we should 1) Do not waste precious document real estate on what other scholars have NOT done. Never go negative. Stay entirely in the realm of what you did, not what others didn’t; and 2) Do not position yourself as “extending” or “adding to” or “building off of” or “continuing” or “applying” other work, either your own or others.
My doctoral thesis is to theoretically extend a theoretical model and empirically test it, which implies that the developer of the original model missed something to consider and I help do it. But if I take (1) and (2) into account. I may not be able to describe the rationale of my dissertation and further show the contribution.
In addition, (part of) my future directions is to increase the generalizability of the extended model, which means that I may apply it to my future research; and to discuss a potential issue in the extended model. However, if I take (2) into account, it seems that I cannot address it in the RS. Interesting enough, I found a number of model developers applied their developed theoretical models throughout the year with different research focuses and to validate the model. Should not such a way recommended to be addressed in the RS? Just a bit confused.
Would you please kindly help with the above? Thanks a lot.
March 4, 2015 at 2:16 pm
I am in public health and am a generalist so I have conduct research on a wide variety of topics. My masters thesis was on cesarean delivery guidelines and my dissertation is on the effect of legislation that bans certain breeds of dogs. I don’t want to pigeon hole myself into a specific topic area, but also don’t want to seem scattered. My research is all related, because it is on health systems or health policy, so I am trying to unify my RS with the theme of research that improves population health. Would you suggest that I list only my dissertation work and a future project that aligns with that, or should I also list my masters work and/or a separate project on a maternal and child theme?
March 11, 2015 at 6:19 pm
With regard to your recommendation to leave names of others out of the research statement, I am struggling with what to do for an edited volume with some *very* prominent contributors. I am the sole editor for the book, and I brought these contributors together. Should their names still be excluded from the research statement, or perhaps included elsewhere (perhaps in the cover letter or CV)?
Thank you for your very helpful postings.
March 12, 2015 at 7:20 pm
I find that many people overestimate the importance/prominence of the names and their value for any job doc. But if they include, like, Judith Butler and her ilk, then sure mention 1-2 such names in the RS.
July 7, 2015 at 12:51 pm
When applying for a faculty position (first job as assistant professor), would you recommend sharing the link of the applicant’s PhD dissertation thesis (if it is available online), if so where exactly?
Thank you very much for all the valuable information!
July 22, 2015 at 12:08 pm
Dear Karen –
I have a question for those out there encountering job openings for technical staff (like myself) with BS degrees requesting research statements. How do I write a RS based on this? Everything I’ve seen online has been geared towards RS for graduate programs or for those with newly minted PhDs.
August 14, 2015 at 6:19 pm
Dear Karen, Is there a difference between a “one page Research Plan” and a “Research Statement” ? Thank you for your generous advice through this blog.
August 29, 2015 at 8:39 pm
Thank you for the helpful posts. I am a postdoc applying for faculty positions, and they all ask something similar but different. It’s either a research statement, a statement of research interests, or a research plan. Do mean my previous research experience, what I plan to do, or both? A research statement sounds like a research summary, but I feel like I’m missing something. I appreciate any clarity you can bring on the subject.
September 2, 2015 at 9:22 am
Dear Dr. Karen, Some of the postdocs require to submit a C.V. and a list of publications. Does it mean that, for these particular applications, the C.V. should not include publications at all? Thanks!
September 2, 2015 at 9:49 pm
Sorry, just realized that had a wrong tab opened while typing the question.
September 24, 2015 at 10:01 pm
Hi Karen, This is a very helpful website indeed. I’ve been teaching university for 5 years (ever since finishing my PhD), and now am at a top 10 university (at least according to the QS rankings, if you put any stock in them). However, I’m applying for what I think is a better job for me at a research museum, one that would have me doing research and supervising grad students as well as doing outreach (something I’ve got piles of experience with). The application asks for a 2-page statement of scientific goals. I’m a little unclear as to how this differs from the research statement. Does it? If so, how? Thanks so much.
October 13, 2015 at 7:09 am
This was really helpful in writing a research statement. Thanks
November 11, 2015 at 1:17 pm
I see that some applications require a vision statement: “no longer than two pages, that outlines one or more major unsolved problems in their field and how they plan to address them.”. Any thoughts about the differences from a research statement?
January 14, 2016 at 7:28 am
How long should the research statement be if it has been requested as part of the cover letter?
May 20, 2016 at 8:24 am
Thank you very much for the very helpful advice, Karen!
I’m a final year PhD in psychology and applying for a postdoc now. The postdoc project seems very prescribed, to the extent that the announcement includes how many studies are planned to be conducted, what the broad hypotheses are and the broad theoretical background. Yet, the application involves an RS. What is the best way to frame a future research project here? Just tailor my diss to fit into the proposed postdoc topic?
July 1, 2016 at 3:10 pm
The place in this blog that should contain the 5-paragraph model doesn’t seem to be present. Instead I get a […]. Possibly a web configuration problem?
July 7, 2016 at 4:58 pm
Please read the para at the top of the post. This and a handful of other posts (about 5 in total) have been shortened so as not to overlap with the content of my book.
August 15, 2016 at 7:43 am
Thank you so much for your wonderful advice.
I have a question regarding the relationship between future research and the title of the position in question and how much overlap there should be between the two. Is it acceptable to propose research that is (this is history-based) from a slightly later/earlier period, or a slightly different geographical region than the position focuses on? Or is it better to align oneself entirely with the constraints of the position?
Many thanks!
August 23, 2016 at 9:46 am
I plan to limit my RS to two pages, but my career trajectory and publication record is a bit unusual. I’m a nationally regarded thirty-three year veteran high school teacher and recent postdoc (2013) from a top tier history department. I’ve been teaching alma mater’s most popular summer session course since 2014. It’s my mentor’s course, but he’ll be replaced with a tenured professor with an endowed chair upon retirement – as well he should. Cornell Press is “interested” in my diss, but…I’m currently revising the original proposal. I’ve also published as often in International Journal of Eating Disorders, Psychology of Women Quarterly and International of Alzheimer’s & Other Dementias as I have in The Journal of Urban History, Long Island Historical Journal and New York Irish History. I teach “the best and the brightest” at a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse public high school. I often publish with my adolescent students, so my scholarship is pretty eclectic. How, exactly, do I sell that to a hiring committee upon retirement from high school/transition to university teaching in June 2017?
September 12, 2016 at 6:29 pm
What is your take on using headings to organize the RS?
October 16, 2016 at 12:28 pm
I am up for tenure this year, and am applying for a tenured position at another school (mainly because I am trying to resolve a two-body problem). Given that I have been out of grad school for quite a while, have a book and many papers published, another book in progress, etc, should my tenure statement be longer than 1-2 pages? What would be a typical length for a mid-career statement?
October 17, 2016 at 1:14 pm
You can go onto a third page, if you’re on a second book.
October 19, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Hi Karen, I’m applying for tenure track jobs in English, and some applications ask for a research statement instead of a dissertation abstract, which is the more common of the two. I’ve been told that even if a dissertation abstract isn’t asked for, I should send one in with my application materials. If I’m asked for a research statement, do I still have to send a dissertation abstract as well? I’m a little worried about some overlap between the two (the obvious repetitions in contribution to the field, etc).
October 29, 2016 at 8:09 pm
I am being asked for a Scholarly Philosophy. Is this the same as a research statement? Are their any nuances of difference that I ought to attend to?
November 2, 2016 at 11:40 am
I’ve actuallynever heard that term. But I’d say it’s about the same as an RS, but perhaps with a bit more focus on wider contribution to the field.
November 8, 2016 at 10:55 am
Hello Karen,
I am a biologist on the market for a TT position (for more years than I would like to admit). I have always wondered whether including 1-2 figures or diagrams that help to illustrate your research plan would be helpful, and maybe even appreciated. I would like to know what you think.
We all know how overburdened search committees are. Pictures might help. Scientists are used to seeing such images in evaluating fellowship applications or grant proposals, why not research statements? I would think it would be a welcome change. So the potential benefit is you stand out and are more memorable, but you may also run the risk of alienating or offending someone, especially because this is uncommon.
Thanks for your posts and your book. I enjoy reading them.
November 10, 2016 at 9:53 am
Yes, in the sciences, diagrams are acceptable. It’s why science RSs are often 3-4 pages long. NOT in your cover letter of course.
January 12, 2017 at 11:56 am
Is it appropriate to put a date at the top or bottom of your statements?
August 4, 2017 at 5:32 am
I have been working as a fellow at a SLAC in the sciences and am directing undergraduate research that does not completely fit the mold of my usual work. Is it acceptable to mention these projects in the RS? Should I only mention ones that we will be trying to publish? Thanks
September 16, 2017 at 3:16 pm
Found some adjuncting this year after basically taking a year off last year. During that time, I was still working on getting material published from graduate school. This includes an article based on my dissertation. That articles is currently going through a revise and resubmit. The revise involves reframing and changing the names of important hypotheses. Do I discuss the work in my RS as it was discussed in my dissertation or talk about it as presented in this article yet to be expected for publication?
September 16, 2017 at 3:17 pm
accepted not expected
September 29, 2017 at 3:43 am
The part about not presenting your work as being better than other peoples’ is hard because constantly in your thesis you are setting up arguments like that! This is why my findings are interesting – because they are better than what other people did/found previously. The old paradigm was limited/wrong, hence my contribution is new/better. That is part of the academic writing genre! But I can see it will come across as much more mature if you downplay that in an application letter.
October 7, 2017 at 12:00 pm
Thanks for this great blog and the book!
I’m applying for a two-year postdoc. They say they want a “research statement,” but I really think they mean a proposal. This is short term, non-TT. I feel like the advice you give about “timeline, timeline, timeline!” is what will make this work better for this application.
Said otherwise, there is no time for a second project in this postdoc (or maybe you beg to differ?) Therefore it seems odd to talk about it.
October 7, 2017 at 2:11 pm
correct, they want a research proposal. Please read the chapters about that in my book. There is time in a two year postdoc to begin to launch a second project.
January 12, 2018 at 1:08 pm
I am just starting my higher education career. I only have my dissertation as published work. How do you suggest I handle to writing of my research statement given those circumstances?
August 27, 2019 at 6:26 am
Hi, I am a fresh PhD about to apply for my first job. I’ve been asked to write a scholarly agenda and am struggling to find what should be included in this. Any help would be great. The position is at a liberal arts college for a tenure track position in the biology department. Thanks
August 27, 2019 at 9:56 am
That would be the RS, and this blog post is about that. Also, check my book out, it has a chapter on this as well, updated from this post. If you need personal help, contact us at [email protected] to get on the calendar for editing help.
September 17, 2019 at 9:22 pm
Thank you for your excellent blog and book. I’m applying for a TT job where they don’t ask for a cover letter, but for a combined statement on research & teaching max 3p. In this case, do I still skip the letterhead and formal address? And what structure/format would you suggest?
Thank you in advance!
September 18, 2019 at 5:00 pm
if it’s truly not meant to be a letter, then don’t make it a letter! Just send a two page Rs and a one page TS nicely integrated into a single doc, with your name at the top.
December 23, 2019 at 6:23 am
Dear Karen, thank you for your wonderful advice here and in the book.I wonder regarding the the 1st para of the research statement. I have seen that many start by stating “I am a historian of X. My work focuses on Y in order to Z …
Is this what you mean by “A brief paragraph sketching the overarching theme and topic of your research,situating it disciplinarily”? would love to see an example of a good 1st para…
December 23, 2019 at 11:12 am
Lili, I provide examples to clients, so if you’d like to work with me, do email at [email protected] !
January 13, 2020 at 4:39 pm
I am just graduating as an undergrad and looking for entry-level research. Should I put something short on my interests if I do not have research experience, or is this section better to be left blank?
October 12, 2020 at 10:49 pm
Any differences with corona? I have two small ongoing projects related to covid. Other than that, I only have my thesis. Would mentioning these two projects be ‘too much’? They are not similar to each other: one has a clear logical link to my thesis, while the other is a new avenue that I want to pursue. They are not big enough to be my second project, but they are my current research. Should I mention them both? One? None?
January 6, 2022 at 11:51 am
Thank you for such detailed information! I searched on your site today in attempt to answer the question “what is a scholarly agenda,” and was pointed to this posting, which doesn’t seem correct, but I at least wanted to ask the question. Is the scholarly agenda a typical piece of writing for tenure processes? I’m about to go up for my three year review in a humanities-based tenure track position, where I am asked for one, and although I’ve written a draft, the university has no template, and in truth, I really don’t understand the aim of the scholarly agenda beyond the general idea of ‘where I want to be as a scholar and professor in three years.’ I’m looking for a blow-by-blow / paragraph-by-paragraph idea of how to structure the piece. I can’t find examples beyond law schools, which isn’t so helpful. Do you have any recommendations?
[…] Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement | The Professor Is In. […]
[…] Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement | The Professor Is In […]
[…] Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement (from The Professor Is In.) […]
[…] at the time. Could that possibly be good enough? I went out and searched the internet and I found Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement. One page long? That doesn’t sound so scary. I didn’t think I could get even my simple […]
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
- Who Is Dr. Karen?
- Who Is On the TPII Team?
- In The News
- Why Trust Me?
- Testimonials
- Peer Editing
- PhD Debt Survey
- Support Fund
- I Help With Custody Cases for Academics
/images/cornell/logo35pt_cornell_white.svg" alt="how long should research statement be"> Cornell University --> Graduate School
Research statement, what is a research statement.
The research statement (or statement of research interests) is a common component of academic job applications. It is a summary of your research accomplishments, current work, and future direction and potential of your work.
The statement can discuss specific issues such as:
- funding history and potential
- requirements for laboratory equipment and space and other resources
- potential research and industrial collaborations
- how your research contributes to your field
- future direction of your research
The research statement should be technical, but should be intelligible to all members of the department, including those outside your subdiscipline. So keep the “big picture” in mind. The strongest research statements present a readable, compelling, and realistic research agenda that fits well with the needs, facilities, and goals of the department.
Research statements can be weakened by:
- overly ambitious proposals
- lack of clear direction
- lack of big-picture focus
- inadequate attention to the needs and facilities of the department or position
Why a Research Statement?
- It conveys to search committees the pieces of your professional identity and charts the course of your scholarly journey.
- It communicates a sense that your research will follow logically from what you have done and that it will be different, important, and innovative.
- It gives a context for your research interests—Why does your research matter? The so what?
- It combines your achievements and current work with the proposal for upcoming research.
- areas of specialty and expertise
- potential to get funding
- academic strengths and abilities
- compatibility with the department or school
- ability to think and communicate like a serious scholar and/or scientist
Formatting of Research Statements
The goal of the research statement is to introduce yourself to a search committee, which will probably contain scientists both in and outside your field, and get them excited about your research. To encourage people to read it:
- make it one or two pages, three at most
- use informative section headings and subheadings
- use bullets
- use an easily readable font size
- make the margins a reasonable size
Organization of Research Statements
Think of the overarching theme guiding your main research subject area. Write an essay that lays out:
- The main theme(s) and why it is important and what specific skills you use to attack the problem.
- A few specific examples of problems you have already solved with success to build credibility and inform people outside your field about what you do.
- A discussion of the future direction of your research. This section should be really exciting to people both in and outside your field. Don’t sell yourself short; if you think your research could lead to answers for big important questions, say so!
- A final paragraph that gives a good overall impression of your research.
Writing Research Statements
- Avoid jargon. Make sure that you describe your research in language that many people outside your specific subject area can understand. Ask people both in and outside your field to read it before you send your application. A search committee won’t get excited about something they can’t understand.
- Write as clearly, concisely, and concretely as you can.
- Keep it at a summary level; give more detail in the job talk.
- Ask others to proofread it. Be sure there are no spelling errors.
- Convince the search committee not only that you are knowledgeable, but that you are the right person to carry out the research.
- Include information that sets you apart (e.g., publication in Science, Nature, or a prestigious journal in your field).
- What excites you about your research? Sound fresh.
- Include preliminary results and how to build on results.
- Point out how current faculty may become future partners.
- Acknowledge the work of others.
- Use language that shows you are an independent researcher.
- BUT focus on your research work, not yourself.
- Include potential funding partners and industrial collaborations. Be creative!
- Provide a summary of your research.
- Put in background material to give the context/relevance/significance of your research.
- List major findings, outcomes, and implications.
- Describe both current and planned (future) research.
- Communicate a sense that your research will follow logically from what you have done and that it will be unique, significant, and innovative (and easy to fund).
Describe Your Future Goals or Research Plans
- Major problem(s) you want to focus on in your research.
- The problem’s relevance and significance to the field.
- Your specific goals for the next three to five years, including potential impact and outcomes.
- If you know what a particular agency funds, you can name the agency and briefly outline a proposal.
- Give broad enough goals so that if one area doesn’t get funded, you can pursue other research goals and funding.
Identify Potential Funding Sources
- Almost every institution wants to know whether you’ll be able to get external funding for research.
- Try to provide some possible sources of funding for the research, such as NIH, NSF, foundations, private agencies.
- Mention past funding, if appropriate.
Be Realistic
There is a delicate balance between a realistic research statement where you promise to work on problems you really think you can solve and over-reaching or dabbling in too many subject areas. Select an over-arching theme for your research statement and leave miscellaneous ideas or projects out. Everyone knows that you will work on more than what you mention in this statement.
Consider Also Preparing a Longer Version
- A longer version (five–15 pages) can be brought to your interview. (Check with your advisor to see if this is necessary.)
- You may be asked to describe research plans and budget in detail at the campus interview. Be prepared.
- Include laboratory needs (how much budget you need for equipment, how many grad assistants, etc.) to start up the research.
Samples of Research Statements
To find sample research statements with content specific to your discipline, search on the internet for your discipline + “Research Statement.”
- University of Pennsylvania Sample Research Statement
- Advice on writing a Research Statement (Plan) from the journal Science
![how long should research statement be University of Pennsylvania](https://cdn.uconnectlabs.com/wp-content/themes/uConnect_UPenn/images/top-ribbon-logo.png)
- Appointments
![how long should research statement be Career Fairs](https://cdn.uconnectlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2019/08/SpringFair-100x56.jpg?v=15535)
- Resume Reviews
![how long should research statement be Penn Career Services](https://cdn.uconnectlabs.com/wp-content/themes/uConnect_UPenn/images/logo.png)
- Undergraduates
- PhDs & Postdocs
- Faculty & Staff
- Prospective Students
- Online Students
- Career Champions
- I’m Exploring
- Architecture & Design
- Education & Academia
- Engineering
- Fashion, Retail & Consumer Products
- Fellowships & Gap Year
- Fine Arts, Performing Arts, & Music
- Government, Law & Public Policy
- Healthcare & Public Health
- International Relations & NGOs
- Life & Physical Sciences
- Marketing, Advertising & Public Relations
- Media, Journalism & Entertainment
- Non-Profits
- Pre-Health, Pre-Law and Pre-Grad
- Real Estate, Accounting, & Insurance
- Social Work & Human Services
- Sports & Hospitality
- Startups, Entrepreneurship & Freelancing
- Sustainability, Energy & Conservation
- Technology, Data & Analytics
- DACA and Undocumented Students
- First Generation and Low Income Students
- International Students
- LGBTQ+ Students
- Transfer Students
- Students of Color
- Students with Disabilities
- Explore Careers & Industries
- Make Connections & Network
- Search for a Job or Internship
- Write a Resume/CV
- Write a Cover Letter
- Engage with Employers
- Research Salaries & Negotiate Offers
- Find Funding
- Develop Professional and Leadership Skills
- Apply to Graduate School
- Apply to Health Professions School
- Apply to Law School
- Self-Assessment
- Experiences
- Post-Graduate
- Jobs & Internships
- Career Fairs
- For Employers
- Meet the Team
- Peer Career Advisors
- Career Services Policies
- Walk-Ins & Pop-Ins
- Strategic Plan 2022-2025
Research statements for faculty job applications
The purpose of a research statement.
The main goal of a research statement is to walk the search committee through the evolution of your research, to highlight your research accomplishments, and to show where your research will be taking you next. To a certain extent, the next steps that you identify within your statement will also need to touch on how your research could benefit the institution to which you are applying. This might be in terms of grant money, faculty collaborations, involving students in your research, or developing new courses. Your CV will usually show a search committee where you have done your research, who your mentors have been, the titles of your various research projects, a list of your papers, and it may provide a very brief summary of what some of this research involves. However, there can be certain points of interest that a CV may not always address in enough detail.
- What got you interested in this research?
- What was the burning question that you set out to answer?
- What challenges did you encounter along the way, and how did you overcome these challenges?
- How can your research be applied?
- Why is your research important within your field?
- What direction will your research take you in next, and what new questions do you have?
While you may not have a good sense of where your research will ultimately lead you, you should have a sense of some of the possible destinations along the way. You want to be able to show a search committee that your research is moving forward and that you are moving forward along with it in terms of developing new skills and knowledge. Ultimately, your research statement should complement your cover letter, CV, and teaching philosophy to illustrate what makes you an ideal candidate for the job. The more clearly you can articulate the path your research has taken, and where it will take you in the future, the more convincing and interesting it will be to read.
Separate research statements are usually requested from researchers in engineering, social, physical, and life sciences, but can also be requested for researchers in the humanities. In many cases, however, the same information that is covered in the research statement is often integrated into the cover letter for many disciplines within the humanities and no separate research statement is requested within the job advertisement. Seek advice from current faculty and new hires about the conventions of your discipline if you are in doubt.
Timeline: Getting Started with your Research Statement
You can think of a research statement as having three distinct parts. The first part will focus on your past research, and can include the reasons you started your research, an explanation as to why the questions you originally asked are important in your field, and a summary some of the work you did to answer some of these early questions.
The middle part of the research statement focuses on your current research. How is this research different from previous work you have done, and what brought you to where you are today? You should still explain the questions you are trying to ask, and it is very important that you focus on some of the findings that you have (and cite some of the publications associated with these findings). In other words, do not talk about your research in abstract terms, make sure that you explain your actual results and findings (even if these may not be entirely complete when you are applying for faculty positions), and mention why these results are significant.
The final part of your research statement should build on the first two parts. Yes, you have asked good questions, and used good methods to find some answers, but how will you now use this foundation to take you into your future? Since you are hoping that your future will be at one of the institutions to which you are applying, you should provide some convincing reasons why your future research will be possible at each institution, and why it will be beneficial to that institution, or to the students at that institution.
While you are focusing on the past, present, and future or your research, and tailoring it to each institution, you should also think about the length of your statement and how detailed or specific you make the descriptions of your research. Think about who will be reading it. Will they all understand the jargon you are using? Are they experts in the subject, or experts in a range of related subjects? Can you go into very specific detail, or do you need to talk about your research in broader terms that make sense to people outside of your research field focusing on the common ground that might exist? Additionally, you should make sure that your future research plans differ from those of your PI or advisor, as you need to be seen as an independent researcher. Identify 4-5 specific aims that can be divided into short-term and long-term goals. You can give some idea of a 5-year research plan that includes the studies you want to perform, but also mention your long-term plans, so that the search committee knows that this is not a finite project.
Another important consideration when writing about your research is realizing that you do not perform research in a vacuum. When doing your research you may have worked within a team environment at some point, or sought out specific collaborations. You may have faced some serious challenges that required some creative problem-solving to overcome. While these aspects are not necessarily as important as your results and your papers or patents, they can help paint a picture of you as a well-rounded researcher who is likely to be successful in the future even if new problems arise, for example.
Follow these general steps to begin developing an effective research statement:
Step 1: Think about how and why you got started with your research. What motivated you to spend so much time on answering the questions you developed? If you can illustrate some of the enthusiasm you have for your subject, the search committee will likely assume that students and other faculty members will see this in you as well. People like to work with passionate and enthusiastic colleagues. Remember to focus on what you found, what questions you answered, and why your findings are significant. The research you completed in the past will have brought you to where you are today; also be sure to show how your research past and research present are connected. Explore some of the techniques and approaches you have successfully used in your research, and describe some of the challenges you overcame. What makes people interested in what you do, and how have you used your research as a tool for teaching or mentoring students? Integrating students into your research may be an important part of your future research at your target institutions. Conclude describing your current research by focusing on your findings, their importance, and what new questions they generate.
Step 2: Think about how you can tailor your research statement for each application. Familiarize yourself with the faculty at each institution, and explore the research that they have been performing. You should think about your future research in terms of the students at the institution. What opportunities can you imagine that would allow students to get involved in what you do to serve as a tool for teaching and training them, and to get them excited about your subject? Do not talk about your desire to work with graduate students if the institution only has undergraduates! You will also need to think about what equipment or resources that you might need to do your future research. Again, mention any resources that specific institutions have that you would be interested in utilizing (e.g., print materials, super electron microscopes, archived artwork). You can also mention what you hope to do with your current and future research in terms of publication (whether in journals or as a book), try to be as specific and honest as possible. Finally, be prepared to talk about how your future research can help bring in grants and other sources of funding, especially if you have a good track record of receiving awards and fellowships. Mention some grants that you know have been awarded to similar research, and state your intention to seek this type of funding.
Step 3: Ask faculty in your department if they are willing to share their own research statements with you. To a certain extent, there will be some subject-specific differences in what is expected from a research statement, and so it is always a good idea to see how others in your field have done it. You should try to draft your own research statement first before you review any statements shared with you. Your goal is to create a unique research statement that clearly highlights your abilities as a researcher.
Step 4: The research statement is typically a few (2-3) pages in length, depending on the number of images, illustrations, or graphs included. Once you have completed the steps above, schedule an appointment with a career advisor to get feedback on your draft. You should also try to get faculty in your department to review your document if they are willing to do so.
Explore other application documents:
![how long should research statement be](https://cdn.uconnectlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2019/08/Cover-letter-logo-258x300.png)
Writing a Research Statement
What is a research statement.
A research statement is a short document that provides a brief history of your past research experience, the current state of your research, and the future work you intend to complete.
The research statement is a common component of a potential student's application for post-undergraduate study. The research statement is often the primary way for departments and faculty to determine if a student's interests and past experience make them a good fit for their program/institution.
Although many programs ask for ‘personal statements,' these are not really meant to be biographies or life stories. What we, at Tufts Psychology, hope to find out is how well your abilities, interests, experiences and goals would fit within our program.
We encourage you to illustrate how your lived experience demonstrates qualities that are critical to success in pursuing a PhD in our program. Earning a PhD in any program is hard! Thus, as you are relaying your past, present, and future research interests, we are interested in learning how your lived experiences showcase the following:
- Perseverance
- Resilience in the face of difficulty
- Motivation to undertake intensive research training
- Involvement in efforts to promote equity and inclusion in your professional and/or personal life
- Unique perspectives that enrich the research questions you ask, the methods you use, and the communities to whom your research applies
How Do I Even Start Writing One?
Before you begin your statement, read as much as possible about our program so you can tailor your statement and convince the admissions committee that you will be a good fit.
Prepare an outline of the topics you want to cover (e.g., professional objectives and personal background) and list supporting material under each main topic. Write a rough draft in which you transform your outline into prose. Set it aside and read it a week later. If it still sounds good, go to the next stage. If not, rewrite it until it sounds right.
Do not feel bad if you do not have a great deal of experience in psychology to write about; no one who is about to graduate from college does. Do explain your relevant experiences (e.g., internships or research projects), but do not try to turn them into events of cosmic proportion. Be honest, sincere, and objective.
What Information Should It Include?
Your research statement should describe your previous experience, how that experience will facilitate your graduate education in our department, and why you are choosing to pursue graduate education in our department. Your goal should be to demonstrate how well you will fit in our program and in a specific laboratory.
Make sure to link your research interests to the expertise and research programs of faculty here. Identify at least one faculty member with whom you would like to work. Make sure that person is accepting graduate students when you apply. Read some of their papers and describe how you think the research could be extended in one or more novel directions. Again, specificity is a good idea.
Make sure to describe your relevant experience (e.g., honors thesis, research assistantship) in specific detail. If you have worked on a research project, discuss that project in detail. Your research statement should describe what you did on the project and how your role impacted your understanding of the research question.
Describe the concrete skills you have acquired prior to graduate school and the skills you hope to acquire.
Articulate why you want to pursue a graduate degree at our institution and with specific faculty in our department.
Make sure to clearly state your core research interests and explain why you think they are scientifically and/or practically important. Again, be specific.
What Should It Look Like?
Your final statement should be succinct. You should be sure to thoroughly read and follow the length and content requirements for each individual application. Finally, stick to the points requested by each program, and avoid lengthy personal or philosophical discussions.
How Do I Know if It is Ready?
Ask for feedback from at least one professor, preferably in the area you are interested in. Feedback from friends and family may also be useful. Many colleges and universities also have writing centers that are able to provide general feedback.
Of course, read and proofread the document multiple times. It is not always easy to be a thoughtful editor of your own work, so don't be afraid to ask for help.
Lastly, consider signing up to take part in the Application Statement Feedback Program . The program provides constructive feedback and editing support for the research statements of applicants to Psychology PhD programs in the United States.
- Enhancing Student Success
- Innovative Research
- Alumni Success
- About NC State
How to Construct a Compelling Research Statement
![how long should research statement be](https://grad.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MH14553-e1586884733906.jpg)
A research statement is a critical document for prospective faculty applicants. This document allows applicants to convey to their future colleagues the importance and impact of their past and, most importantly, future research. You as an applicant should use this document to lay out your planned research for the next few years, making sure to outline how your planned research contributes to your field.
Some general guidelines
(from Carleton University )
An effective research statement accomplishes three key goals:
- It clearly presents your scholarship in nonspecialist terms;
- It places your research in a broader context, scientifically and societally; and
- It lays out a clear road map for future accomplishments in the new setting (the institution to which you’re applying).
Another way to think about the success of your research statement is to consider whether, after reading it, a reader is able to answer these questions:
- What do you do (what are your major accomplishments; what techniques do you use; how have you added to your field)?
- Why is your work important (why should both other scientists and nonscientists care)?
- Where is it going in the future (what are the next steps; how will you carry them out in your new job; does your research plan meet the requirements for tenure at this institution)?
1. Make your statement reader-friendly
A typical faculty application call can easily receive 200+ applicants. As such, you need to make all your application documents reader-friendly. Use headings and subheadings to organize your ideas and leave white space between sections.
In addition, you may want to include figures and diagrams in your research statement that capture key findings or concepts so a reader can quickly determine what you are studying and why it is important. A wall of text in your research statement should be avoided at all costs. Rather, a research statement that is concise and thoughtfully laid out demonstrates to hiring committees that you can organize ideas in a coherent and easy-to-understand manner.
Also, this presentation demonstrates your ability to develop competitive funding applications (see more in next section), which is critical for success in a research-intensive faculty position.
2. Be sure to touch on the fundability of your planned research work
Another goal of your research statement is to make the case for why your planned research is fundable. You may get different opinions here, but I would recommend citing open or planned funding opportunities at federal agencies or other funders that you plan to submit to. You might also use open funding calls as a way to demonstrate that your planned research is in an area receiving funding prioritization by various agencies.
If you are looking for funding, check out this list of funding resources on my personal website. Another great way to look for funding is to use NIH Reporter and NSF award search .
3. Draft the statement and get feedback early and often
I can tell you from personal experience that it takes time to refine a strong research statement. I went on the faculty job market two years in a row and found my second year materials to be much stronger. You need time to read, review and reflect on your statements and documents to really make them stand out.
It is important to have your supervisor and other faculty read and give feedback on your critical application documents and especially your research statement. Also, finding peers to provide feedback and in return giving them feedback on their documents is very helpful. Seek out communities of support such as Future PI Slack to find peer reviewers (and get a lot of great application advice) if needed.
4. Share with nonexperts to assess your writing’s clarity
Additionally, you may want to consider sharing your job materials, including your research statement, with non-experts to assess clarity. For example, NC State’s Professional Development Team offers an Academic Packways: Gearing Up for Faculty program each year where you can get feedback on your application documents from individuals working in a variety of areas. You can also ask classmates and colleagues working in different areas to review your research statement. The more feedback you can receive on your materials through formal or informal means, the better.
5. Tailor your statement to the institution
It is critical in your research statement to mention how you will make use of core facilities or resources at the institution you are applying to. If you need particular research infrastructure to do your work and the institution has it, you should mention that in your statement. Something to the effect of: “The presence of the XXX core facility at YYY University will greatly facilitate my lab’s ability to investigate this important process.”
Mentioning core facilities and resources at the target institution shows you have done your research, which is critical in demonstrating your interest in that institution.
Finally, think about the resources available at the institution you are applying to. If you are applying to a primarily undergraduate-serving institution, you will want to be sure you propose a research program that could reasonably take place with undergraduate students, working mostly in the summer and utilizing core facilities that may be limited or require external collaborations.
Undergraduate-serving institutions will value research projects that meaningfully involve students. Proposing overly ambitious research at a primarily undergraduate institution is a recipe for rejection as the institution will read your application as out of touch … that either you didn’t do the work to research them or that you are applying to them as a “backup” to research-intensive positions.
You should carefully think about how to restructure your research statements if you are applying to both primarily undergraduate-serving and research-intensive institutions. For examples of how I framed my research statement for faculty applications at each type of institution, see my personal website ( undergraduate-serving ; research-intensive research statements).
6. Be yourself, not who you think the search committee wants
In the end, a research statement allows you to think critically about where you see your research going in the future. What are you excited about studying based on your previous work? How will you go about answering the unanswered questions in your field? What agencies and initiatives are funding your type of research? If you develop your research statement from these core questions, your passion and commitment to the work will surely shine through.
A closing thought: Be yourself, not who you think the search committee wants. If you try to frame yourself as someone you really aren’t, you are setting the hiring institution and you up for disappointment. You want a university to hire you because they like you, the work you have done, and the work you want to do, not some filtered or idealized version of you.
So, put your true self out there, and realize you want to find the right institutional fit for you and your research. This all takes time and effort. The earlier you start and the more reflection and feedback you get on your research statement and remaining application documents, the better you can present the true you to potential employers.
More Advice on Faculty Job Application Documents on ImPACKful
How to write a better academic cover letter
Tips on writing an effective teaching statement
More Resources
See here for samples of a variety of application materials from UCSF.
- Rules of the (Social Sciences & Humanities) Research Statement
- CMU’s Writing a Research Statement
- UW’s Academic Careers: Research Statements
- Developing a Winning Research Statement (UCSF)
- Academic Packways
- ImPACKful Tips
Leave a Response Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
More From The Graduate School
![how long should research statement be sun sets over brick building](https://grad.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/campus2020-87.jpg)
Advice From Newly Hired Assistant Professors
![how long should research statement be Word Cloud of PRS 2021 Attendee Sentiment](https://grad.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/PRS-2021-Sentiment-WordCloud-resized.jpg)
Virtual Postdoc Research Symposium Elevates and Supports Postdoctoral Scholars Across North Carolina
![how long should research statement be Writing support group meets over zoom](https://grad.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Writing-Support-Group-Img.png)
Expand Your Pack: Start or Join an Online Writing Group!
Writing a Research Statement
Introduction.
Writing a research statement was one of the more challenging things that I’ve had to do in my career, because it reflected a transition point between being a PhD student, to thinking more like a PI. As a student, I become used to thinking of research in terms of separate projects: I would motivate an aim, run some experiments, output a research paper, and then move onto the next project (obviously, the process is far, far less straight-forward than that trite summary, but the point is that I had become used to thinking of research as atomized outputs). But as I was looking down the tunnel to the next stage in my career, the research statement was the main document that made me realize that kind of thinking would no longer suffice: instead of simply describing a bunch of separate projects, I now had to convince hiring committees that a) I had a larger research vision, and b) this larger research vision would serve as a wellspring for sustained research, as opposed to a scattering of one-off projects.
I got a lot of mentorship in this process - postdocs, faculty mentors, and my supervisor were all incredibly supportive and helped review multiple iterations of my drafts, providing detailed feedback. However, one thing that struck me about the process was how inequitable it was: I was fortunate to have a lot of intensive one-on-one attention in developing my vision, but not everyone has access to this. Job adverts are remarkably low in detail about what a research statement actually entails, and if you’re unlucky with mentorship, and you don’t know where to look, you might not actually know what a research statement looks like or is supposed to accomplish. By sharing my own research statements and a few high-level tips, I’m hoping to (minorly) level the playing field a little.
Disclaimer: Everything in this article is from my own perspective, and other people have have different experiences with the process. Not everything I write here will work for everyone! I encourage you to seek out multiple perspectives.
Download the first draft and the final version of my research statements here.
Some contextual notes: I’m a computational biologist. Different fields have different standards for research statements. Some fields only require 1-2 pages; other fields expect up to 10 pages. I would check in with mentors in your area to understand field-specific nuances (tip: ask recently hired assistant professors, since they were just through the process and are most “up to date”). I also mostly targeted my application towards research-intensive institutions. If you’re targeting an institution that emphasizes a blend of teaching/research (e.g. R2s, PUAs, SLACs), your research statement should look different.
High-level tips
At the core, the research statement should a) summarize your research interests, b) explain your future plans for research in the position you’re applying for, c) convince the hiring committee that your research is impactful and fundable, and d) you are capable of carrying out independent and sustained research program.
That’s a lot to achieve in one document. As a result, the research statement is a tight balancing act between many elements:
- Establish a research vision. As I explained in the introduction, this a transition point that many PhD students struggle with, since it’s not a muscle that not everyone exercises at the PhD level. What are the larger problems that motivate you? Why are these problems exciting and impactful? At the same time, even if you can pitch an incredibly exciting, impactful, and ambitious research vision, it’s no good if you can’t convince the hiring committee that you can actually do it. So the research statement needs to include just enough details to show that you have some specific plans and the know-how to execute these plans (but not enough that your statement gets lost in the trees and loses conciseness). One common format is to propose three research projects unified by a central vision, as having some specific projects gives a sense of direction and an opportunity to impress technical knowledge.
- The research statement should be a forward facing document. The CV describes that you did in the past; the research statement should be more focused on what you will do in the future. At the same time, convincing research builds upon past experience and doesn’t just materialize out of nowhere. Thus, you should also emphasize your skillset and past successes in a way that doesn’t make them the focal point of your research statement, but supports what you have written about your goals.
- Demonstrate independence and demonstrate that your proposed research is unique. One common pitfall is when candidates propose research that is basically what their advisor(s) do. For example, a research statement that is simply a straight-forward extension of the PhD or postdoc work can give this impression. At the core, the committee wants to know if you can propose new ideas even without the support of an official mentor. But there is also a pragmatic element to this: it’s usually desirable to show that you’re not in direct competition with your previous lab. This is a larger point that should be impressed on by the research statement. Ideally, you’re proposing an impactful research vision: but if the research vision has impact, why aren’t other scientists already working on it? Thus, you should demonstrate that even though you’re working on an important problem, you have some unique angle or skills that differentiate you from other people working on similar problems - including your advisor, but also the larger scientific community at hand.
- Finally, even as you show that your research is ambitious, impactful, and independent, you still need to convince the hiring committee that you can actually execute it. Usually, this is a point that has to executed from multiple fronts. I alluded to some of these above: referencing specific projects and past experience. Another point that (some) researchers choose to incorporate is pointing to collaborators. Not only does this help in proposing a more ambitious research agenda by pointing to skills or resources that you alone may not be able to cover, but it shows that you are connected to a larger community as an academic (and presumably, this community cares about your research.) As with the other points, this needs to be executed in moderation: too much, and you’ll raise questions about how independent your research program will be.
My research statement as an example
The advice I gave above is rather abstract - it can be hard to see how to actually execute some of these points. To make this more concrete, I encourage you to look at how my own research statement evolved from the first draft to the final draft, with again, ample help from my supervisor and other mentors.
Here are some things to look out for:
- I improved the scope and impact of my research vision: This is especially apparent in how I introduce my research statement. In the first draft, I am narrowly focused on machine learning for microscopy images. This was mostly what I did in my PhD, so it felt “safe” when I was first drafting the statement. In my final draft, I propose a more ambitious vision of applying deep learning in biology in general. Note that none of the research projects that I am proposing have drastically changed. Instead, I’ve just framed these projects to have more widespread impact (than just the limited subset of biologists who work with high-throughput image screens alone.)
- I inverted the chronological order of each project section into a “supporting experience” section: My first draft tries to tell my story in a chronological order, but I ultimately decided this detracted from the vision of the research statement. In the final draft, I separate my past work, and instead put it at the bottom of each section as evidence that I can carry out the research. Hopefully you can see that again, much of the content has not changed. Instead, what this new structure does is alter the motivation underlying each project: instead of being the rationale for past work, the motivation for each section now comes off as more arching subgoals (e.g. “make computational analysis the first option biologist use to understand their datasets”, “enhance the depth of insight across many experiments in many labs, not just big dataset generated by a few centralized groups”) that I will address in my research program, and the past work is shown as evidence that I’ve made strides towards these motivations.
- I consolidated the background into a single section: This helps centralize what I view my core strength and differentiating angle is. I go to pains to emphasize that this is a recent angle (i.e. “I pioneered one of the first self-supervised methods for biology”), and to emphasize that even as the strategy becomes popular, I still take a different perspective than the field at large ("[Other work] repurpose methods from mainstream data domains. I design methods athat incorporate biological assumptions.") Emphasizing that these are newer ideas that I established helps answer questions of independence and differentiation. It also helps set up the rest of the proposal, which is proposing a significant amount of breadth: typically, it would be challenging for a researcher to work on so many different modalities and domains, but I suggest that this is feasible through naming specific collaborations, and emphasizing that I still have a “core” background uniting work in all of these different domains, which is my methodological expertise.
One final tip is that everyone’s research statement will look different. Some of the strategies I executed in my research statement make sense for me, but would not make sense for everyone: this includes not just content, but even the format and structure of the statement. I suspect this is why so little “official” guidance or templates exist for research statements - everyone has a different path through their academic training, so everyone’s story will look different. In other words, the flexibility of the research statement makes it daunting, but is also a strength you can leverage: what would be the best way to tell your story?
Last updated on Aug 22, 2022
Edit this page
Writing a research statement
By michael ernst, december, 2011 last updated: march 29, 2016.
A research statement lays out your vision of your research, including both your accomplishments to date and your plans for the future. It is a required part of many applications — for graduate school , for fellowships , for jobs (especially academic jobs ), for awards, etc.
This is a short collection of advice regarding some mistakes I have seen people make in their statements. It is incomplete at present, but still useful if it helps you avoid those common but important blunders.
Write your statement in the first person.
Your statement will likely discuss multiple research projects or results. Readers are unlikely to remember each of the projects in detail (though they may remember that you are broad, which is good). It will be easiest for readers to remember your work, and equally importantly to place it in context as they read your statement, if you can show how the projects are related. They might be in the same research subarea, or use related techniques, or stem from your own experiences, etc. Find a way to tie them together, which will make readers more likely to understand them. Furthermore, readers will be more likely to believe that you may continue to produce similar results in the future, if they see a pattern. After starting out with an overview (which might describe the general topic and its importance), tie the description of each result or project into that overview.
Somewhere — maybe at the beginning, though more likely at the end — you need to bring the statement to life and let your personality show through. Permit yourself to gush about how much you enjoy research: show that you really care about this and why. For example, you might state how important it is to you and how it has changed the way you think about your research area computing. Another way to address this (not incompatible with the others) is to say why you got involved in research at all; that might go at the beginning. If readers believe that you are enthusiastic about the topic, they will be more likely to believe that you are doing a great job and will be more favorably inclined toward you in general.
Humans To Robots Laboratory
Empowering every person with a collaborative robot, writing a research statement for graduate school and fellowships.
Writing a research statement happens many times throughout a research career. Often for the first time it happens when applying to Ph.D. programs or applying to fellowships. Later, you will be writing postdoc and faculty applications. These documents are challenging to write because they seek to capture your entire research career in one document that may be read in 90 seconds or less.
Think of the research statement as a proposal. Whether you are applying for a Ph.D. program or for a faculty position, you are trying to convince the reader to invest in you. To decide whether to make this investment they need to know three things: 1) what will you do with the investment, 2) why is that an important problem ? and 3) what evidence is there that you will be successful in achieving the goals that you have set out.
The first paragraph, therefore, should describe what problem you are aiming to solve, and why it is an important problem. One common failure mode is to be too general and vague in this paragraph. Yes we all want to solve AI! But you want to write about your specific take, angle, or approach. This will set up the rest of the statement, about why you are the one person uniquely qualified to solve the problem you set up here. Sometimes people shy away from being too specific, because they worry that it will put them in a box. Don’t worry! Research interests always evolve, and you will not be signing in blood to do this exact research plan. It is better to ere on the side of being too specific because it shows you can scope out an exciting project and that you have good ideas, even if you are not sure that this specific idea is the one you will eventually pursue.
The next paragraphs should describe your past work as it fits into the research vision you have outlined in the first paragraph. You can start with a paragraph for each project or paper you have worked on. The paragraphs can be more or less the abstract for the paper . However you should be clear exactly what your role in the project was, give credit to collaborators, and spend more time on the parts of the project you contributed to directly. You also need to tie it to the research vision in paragraph 1. The strongest statement presents your life, as an arrow that points unambiguously towards solving the research question you have outlined in paragraph 1. Of course, no one’s life is actually an unambiguous arrow! However I think it helps to think that way because you are trying to tie the projects together to show how they have prepared you and furthered you along the research trajectory. Even if this project wasn’t directly connected in terms of its research questions, you can write about how it taught you technical tools that you can apply to your research objective, or how it taught you something that led to your current research objective.
The last paragraphs should describe concretely what you plan to do next. If you are applying to a Ph.D. program, you should name the groups you wish to work with and explain why they are a good fit for you. For a fellowship, you should describe why this work is a good fit for the work done by the organization you are applying to.
Share this:
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
- Your Job Search
- Developing Application Materials
- Academic Job Market
Research Statement
Research statements are a frequent component of the academic job market application portfolio and one of the more field-specific documents. In a research statement, you are explaining to the search committee your scholarly profile, research agenda, impact of your work, and how your scholarship fits into the department and institution.
While the research statement can vary widely depending on field and institution, in general, research statements:
- Are up to two pages in length
- Written as first-person narratives (e.g., "My research focuses on ..."; "I consider ...")
- Address research topic and details
- Demonstrate methodologies used, approach, techniques, etc.
- Address the impact of your work
- Speak to future research agendas
- Can address questions of diversity, equity, and inclusion
Content Considerations
While your research statement needs to specify your current research and the foundation you have developed in your doctoral program, you also need to speak to how this current work relates to a future-looking research agenda. You want to talk the search committee through the evolution of your research from current project to future pathways. Think of the statement in three parts:
- What is the current state of research and why is it important to your field?
- What immediate work (publications, grants, impact) will you get out of this research? Why is it important?
- How will you use the skills built in the first two parts to develop future projects? In what direction do you hope to grow? How is this research possible at this particular institution?
Finally, think about the reader of your research statement: a search committee that may be familiar with your field but still requires an easily legible and accessible statement. While drafting and revising, keep this reader in mind:
- Will they understand the jargon?
- Can your research be understood by colleagues outside of your adviser, committee, and immediate peers?
- What about the student population at this institution? How can they be involved and help develop your research agenda?
- What resources (equipment, access, buildings) does the institution have and how can that help with your research agenda?
You as a Peer
Of utmost importance in a research statement is that you are not talking as a graduate student. You are not proposing a dissertation or potential experiment. In the research statement, you are delineating the contours of your research so a hiring committee can determine if it is in the interest of the department to invest in your candidature. Think about the position you are applying to:
- How does your research style fit within the department?
- How does your research complement projects or programs already underway within the department?
- How would your research engage with the department’s broader interests (e.g., their teaching output or interdisciplinary perspectives)?
- How would your research benefit the institution (grants, collaborations, new courses, new projects, etc.)?
As with all application documents, make sure to have multiple eyes on the content before submitting your statement. Take advantage of the support Northwestern provides from the Graduate Writing Place, Office of Fellowships, and Northwestern Career Advancement .
Postdocs can make appointments for individualized feedback with the Office of Postdoctoral Affairs .
- Skip to main content
- Skip to main navigation
Division of Graduate Studies
COVID-19 Info
Graduate program contacts, graduate programs, graduate student commons, newsletters, postdoctoral scholars, academic regulations, applications and forms, degree progress, family support, fellowships and financial aid, health and safety, orientation for new students.
- Professional Development
Summer Individual Studies
Support programs, teaching resources, underrepresented students, career development and planning, childcare reimbursement, employment and union info, entrepreneurship, graduate division distinguished faculty mentor award, graduate division outstanding postdoc award, graduate division postdoc support, international, underrepresented, national postdoc association, postdocs association, potential postdoctoral scholars, training and mentoring.
- Certificate Programs
- Online Courses
- Professional Development Events
- Professional Organizations
- Professional Skills
Commencement
Distinguished grad alum ceremony, graduate symposium, postdoc symposium.
Home / Professional Development / Resources / Research Statement
- Research Statement
Research institutions increasingly request that applicants for academic positions involving a significant percentage of research time include a research statement with other application materials. This may be more common for postdoctoral scholars applying for research faculty positions, particularly in STEM fields, but is sometimes a request of graduate students and those in the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences for faculty positions involving both research and teaching responsibilities.
The research statement describes your current research and plans for future research endeavor. While your CV lists facts about your research, your research statement offers the opportunity to expand and provide personal context, such as why you chose this research subject, difficulties and how you resolved them, and why the research is important. In one to three pages, the statement demonstrates your:
- independent research ability
- writing proficiency
- potential for grant application success
Description of past research should lead to and support the goals you have for future research. The description of current research includes how you will communicate your results, such as publication in a dissertation, paper, book, or other academic forum. The statement should showcase your research success but, more importantly, describe your future research goals and how they are different (and independent from) those you pursued under your faculty adviser. It is key to show your path to research independence, that you developed and followed independent research that you plan to continue to develop wherever you are hired.
If your adviser recommends it, you might want to write different research statements for different institutions and describe how your research goals align with the mission of each institution and program you’re applying to. The most important reviewer of your research statement prior to you sending it with your other portfolio items is your faculty adviser.
- Grammarly Premium
- Slide Design Principles
- Report an accessibility barrier
- Land Acknowledgment
- Accreditation
Last modified: June 16, 2023 81.177.182.154
Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Should the length of a research statement and a teaching statement be the same?
I am applying to a faculty position that emphasizes both research and undergraduate teaching. The application asks for a research statement and a teaching statement.I realize that both documents are usually recommended to be 1-2 pages long and that you should always err on the side of brevity.
My question is: would it be an issue if the lengths of the 2 documents are significantly different ? For example, if my teaching statement is 2 pages but my research statement is only 1 page. Will a hiring committee automatically view this as the candidate being unbalanced? In other words, does disparity in length between the 2 documents outweigh the content of the documents?
Lastly, would it make a difference depending on the emphasis of the program? For example, should the research statement always be longer (or as long as) a teaching statement if the school places greater emphasis on research (and vice versa)?
- application
- faculty-application
- teaching-statement
![how long should research statement be theforestecologist's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/1nMw6.jpg?s=64)
I'm not sure why you think that a research statement should be 1-2 pages. The length of a research statement depends both on the academic field and (to a lesser extent) on the type of institution one is applying to. In my experience, when a research statement that is only 1-2 pages long is desired, the position posting will mention that explicitly, often using slightly different language ("research summary").
In my field -- mathematics -- if a length of 1-2 pages is not explicitly asked for, then 1-2 pages would be distressingly short, to the extent of jeopardizing your chances. I would put 4-6 pages as a more reasonable range for those applying for junior faculty positions. (More senior people can submit longer statements, but after a point people will stop reading.)
To be specific, I have been closely involved with the job search of two junior colleagues, in mathematics. Both are interested in finding a "faculty position that emphasizes both research and undergraduate teaching." Each of their research statements was about 4 pages plus references. They have each done very well on the job market -- on-campus interviews from both large universities and top liberal arts colleges, and one already has a good job offer. I would not want any student, mentee or junior colleague of mine to send out a 1-2 page research statement until they convinced me that this length was specifically wanted by the institution they're applying to.
My question is: would it be an issue if the lengths of the 2 documents are significantly different?
In my experience -- which is centered at a math department at a state research university -- research statements are generally 2-3 times longer than teaching statements. The only teaching statement I've ever seen that was approximately the same length as a research statement was my own. (Regular readers of this site will be shocked to learn that I can be seduced by the sound of my own written voice. Only over long years and after reading, writing and refereeing many technical papers have I come to a halfway decent appreciation of the virtues of brevity.)
My question is: would it be an issue if the lengths of the 2 documents are significantly different? For example, if my teaching statement is 2 pages but my research statement is only 1 page.
To me, someone whose teaching statement is twice as long as their research statement is signalling in the strongest possible terms that they are more interested in teaching than research...i.e., up to the point where they may not be doing much post-PhD research at all. But again: please check on your local academic culture.
Will a hiring committee automatically view this as the candidate being unbalanced?
Not automatically, no.
In other words, does disparity in length between the two documents outweigh the content of the documents?
No, the content is most important. If in your one page research statement you give a clear description of very strong research, people who were expecting a much longer document will think "What a short research statement. That's weird. But it sounds good -- let me check the CV / publication list / candidate's webpage for more details."
Added : I'm finding some evidence online pointing to the possibility that research statements in mathematics may be longer than in many other academic fields:
- This source advises that research statements in CS should be 2-3 pages.
- This source suggests that research statements should be 1-2 pages. Upon questioning, it becomes clear that the advice is scoped only for the humanities.
Anyway, you should definitely not choose the length of your research statement by what some internet academic tells you! You should do so by (i) talking to your thesis advisor about it and (ii) comparing notes with others who are or recently were on the job market. Getting a look at application materials of those who recently got the type of job that you want is ideal. That's what friends are for.
You must log in to answer this question.
Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged application job-search faculty-application teaching-statement ..
- Featured on Meta
- Announcing a change to the data-dump process
- Upcoming initiatives on Stack Overflow and across the Stack Exchange network...
Hot Network Questions
- Is this sample LSAT question / answer based in fallacy?
- What is the meaning of "chabeen" in Conde's "The Gospel According to the New World"?
- Is this 1-line proof of Cayley–Hamilton incomplete?
- Short story where a scientist develops a virus that renders everyone on Earth sterile
- Studies on Square Roots
- Did ancient Greco-Roman people think their thoughts/feelings came from spirits or gods?
- Publishing a paper written in your free time as an unaffiliated author when you are affiliated
- What does "joint-most" exactly mean?
- Why is my internet speed slowing by 10x when using this coax cable and splitter setup?
- Visualising a mapping
- What to do about chain rubbing on unusually placed chainstay?
- Can I remove these truss supports?
- Submitting paper to lower tier journal instead of doing major revision at higher tier journal
- Callout[] unpredictably fails to display
- Is there a maximum time a check can take to bounce?
- All QFTs are Finite
- In lead sheet does tie also apply to chord?
- Why is this pipe in my garage filled with concrete?
- Why does the 68000 have Immediate addressing modes for .b instructions?
- How does one go from wavefunctions to fields?
- Can a vacuum reverse rusting of iron?
- How do RF broadcast towers switch so much power so quickly?
- Is a sixteenth note quintuplet worth 4 sixteenth notes? If so, why is this wrong?
- Former manager and team keep reaching out with questions despite transferring to a new team
- PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
- EDIT Edit this Article
- EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Happiness Hub Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
- Browse Articles
- Learn Something New
- Quizzes Hot
- Happiness Hub
- This Or That Game
- Train Your Brain
- Explore More
- Support wikiHow
- About wikiHow
- Log in / Sign up
- Education and Communications
How to Write a Research Statement
Last Updated: April 25, 2024 Fact Checked
This article was co-authored by Christopher Taylor, PhD . Christopher Taylor is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of English at Austin Community College in Texas. He received his PhD in English Literature and Medieval Studies from the University of Texas at Austin in 2014. There are 7 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 66,599 times.
The research statement is a very common component of job applications in academia. The statement provides a summary of your research experience, interests, and agenda for reviewers to use to assess your candidacy for a position. Because the research statement introduces you as a researcher to the people reviewing your job application, it’s important to make the statement as impressive as possible. After you’ve planned out what you want to say, all you have to do is write your research statement with the right structure, style, and formatting!
Research Statement Outline and Example
![how long should research statement be how long should research statement be](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/1/1a/Research-Statement-Outline_sample.png/340px-Research-Statement-Outline_sample.png)
Planning Your Research Statement
![how long should research statement be Step 1 Ask yourself what the major themes or questions in your research are.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/8/8a/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-1-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-1-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, some of the major themes of your research might be slavery and race in the 18th century, the efficacy of cancer treatments, or the reproductive cycles of different species of crab.
- You may have several small questions that guide specific aspects of your research. Write all of these questions out, then see if you can formulate a broader question that encapsulates all of these smaller questions.
![how long should research statement be Step 2 Identify why your research is important.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/c/cf/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-2-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-2-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if your work is on x-ray technology, describe how your research has filled any knowledge gaps in your field, as well as how it could be applied to x-ray machines in hospitals.
- It’s important to be able to articulate why your research should matter to people who don’t study what you study to generate interest in your research outside your field. This is very helpful when you go to apply for grants for future research.
![how long should research statement be Step 3 Describe what your future research interests are.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/9a/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-3-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-3-Version-2.jpg)
- Explain why these are the things you want to research next. Do your best to link your prior research to what you hope to study in the future. This will help give your reviewer a deeper sense of what motivates your research and why it matters.
![how long should research statement be Step 4 Think of examples of challenges or problems you’ve solved.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/a/a2/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-4-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-4-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if your research was historical and the documents you needed to answer your question didn’t exist, describe how you managed to pursue your research agenda using other types of documents.
![how long should research statement be Step 5 List the relevant skills you can use at the institution you’re applying to.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/5/5b/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-5-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-5-Version-2.jpg)
- Some skills you might be able to highlight include experience working with digital archives, knowledge of a foreign language, or the ability to work collaboratively. When you're describing your skills, use specific, action-oriented words, rather than just personality traits. For example, you might write "speak Spanish" or "handled digital files."
- Don’t be modest about describing your skills. You want your research statement to impress whoever is reading it.
Structuring and Writing the Statement
![how long should research statement be Step 1 Put an executive summary in the first section.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/3/3d/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-6-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-6-Version-2.jpg)
- Because this section summarizes the rest of your research statement, you may want to write the executive summary after you’ve written the other sections first.
- Write your executive summary so that if the reviewer chooses to only read this section instead of your whole statement, they will still learn everything they need to know about you as an applicant.
- Make sure that you only include factual information that you can prove or demonstrate. Don't embellish or editorialize your experience to make it seem like it's more than it is.
![how long should research statement be Step 2 Describe your graduate research in the second section.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/97/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-7-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-7-Version-2.jpg)
- If you received a postdoctoral fellowship, describe your postdoc research in this section as well.
- If at all possible, include research in this section that goes beyond just your thesis or dissertation. Your application will be much stronger if reviewers see you as a researcher in a more general sense than as just a student.
![how long should research statement be Step 3 Discuss your current research projects in the third section.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/f/f9/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-8-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-8-Version-2.jpg)
- Again, as with the section on your graduate research, be sure to include a description of why this research matters and what relevant skills you bring to bear on it.
- If you’re still in graduate school, you can omit this section.
![how long should research statement be Step 4 Write about your future research interests in the fourth section.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/d/d6/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-9-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-9-Version-2.jpg)
- Be realistic in describing your future research projects. Don’t describe potential projects or interests that are extremely different from your current projects. If all of your research to this point has been on the American civil war, future research projects in microbiology will sound very farfetched.
![how long should research statement be Step 5 Acknowledge how your work complements others’ research.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/7/73/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-10-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-10-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, add a sentence that says “Dr. Jameson’s work on the study of slavery in colonial Georgia has served as an inspiration for my own work on slavery in South Carolina. I would welcome the opportunity to be able to collaborate with her on future research projects.”
![how long should research statement be Step 6 Discuss potential funding partners in your research statement.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/5/54/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-11-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-11-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if your research focuses on the history of Philadelphia, add a sentence to the paragraph on your future research projects that says, “I believe based on my work that I would be a very strong candidate to receive a Balch Fellowship from the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.”
- If you’ve received funding for your research in the past, mention this as well.
![how long should research statement be Step 7 Aim to keep your research statement to about 2 pages.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/1/19/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-12-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-12-Version-2.jpg)
- Typically, your research statement should be about 1-2 pages long if you're applying for a humanities or social sciences position. For a position in psychology or the hard sciences, your research statement may be 3-4 pages long.
- Although you may think that having a longer research statement makes you seem more impressive, it’s more important that the reviewer actually read the statement. If it seems too long, they may just skip it, which will hurt your application.
Formatting and Editing
![how long should research statement be Step 1 Maintain a polite and formal tone throughout the statement.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/95/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-13-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-13-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, instead of saying, “This part of my research was super hard,” say, “I found this obstacle to be particularly challenging.”
![how long should research statement be Step 2 Avoid using technical jargon when writing the statement.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/2/2c/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-14-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-14-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if your research is primarily in anthropology, refrain from using phrases like “Gini coefficient” or “moiety.” Only use phrases that someone in a different field would probably be familiar with, such as “cultural construct,” “egalitarian,” or “social division.”
- If you have trusted friends or colleagues in fields other than your own, ask them to read your statement for you to make sure you don’t use any words or concepts that they can’t understand.
![how long should research statement be Step 3 Write in present tense, except when you’re describing your past work.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/3/3d/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-15-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-15-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, when describing your dissertation, say, “I hypothesized that…” When describing your future research projects, say, “I intend to…” or “My aim is to research…”
![how long should research statement be Step 4 Use single spacing and 11- or 12-point font.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/e0/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-16-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-16-Version-2.jpg)
- At the same time, don’t make your font too big. If you write your research statement in a font larger than 12, you run the risk of appearing unprofessional.
![how long should research statement be Step 5 Use section headings to organize your statement.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/b/be/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-17-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-17-Version-2.jpg)
- For instance, if you completed a postdoc, use subheadings in the section on previous research experience to delineate the research you did in graduate school and the research you did during your fellowship.
![how long should research statement be Step 6 Proofread your research statement thoroughly before submitting it.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/95/Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-18-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Write-a-Research-Statement-Step-18-Version-2.jpg)
Expert Q&A
You might also like.
![how long should research statement be Find Information on People](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/9c/Find-Information-on-People-Step-14-Version-2.jpg/-crop-342-184-245px-Find-Information-on-People-Step-14-Version-2.jpg)
- ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/graduate_school_applications/writing_a_research_statement.html
- ↑ https://www.cmu.edu/student-success/other-resources/handouts/comm-supp-pdfs/writing-research-statement.pdf
- ↑ https://postdocs.cornell.edu/research-statement
- ↑ https://gradschool.cornell.edu/academic-progress/pathways-to-success/prepare-for-your-career/take-action/research-statement/
- ↑ https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/executivesummary
- ↑ https://www.niu.edu/writingtutorial/style/formal-and-informal-style.shtml
- ↑ https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/student-resources/writing-speaking-resources/editing-and-proofreading-techniques
About This Article
![how long should research statement be Christopher Taylor, PhD](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/2/2c/Chris_Taylor_Photo.jpg/-crop-100-100-99px-Chris_Taylor_Photo.jpg)
- Send fan mail to authors
Reader Success Stories
![how long should research statement be Daniella](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/0/0a/CommunityAvatar1.png/-crop-72-72-72px-CommunityAvatar1.png)
Apr 24, 2022
Did this article help you?
![how long should research statement be how long should research statement be](https://www.wikihow.com/images/0/04/Wpro_v01_0728x0180.jpg)
![](http://earnmoneybangla.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Featured Articles
![how long should research statement be Be Friendly](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/ee/Be-Friendly-Step-21-Version-2.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Be-Friendly-Step-21-Version-2.jpg)
Trending Articles
![how long should research statement be How to Do Nice Things for Your Parents & Show Your Appreciation](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/1/1b/Do-Nice-Things-for-Your-Parents-Step-10-Version-3.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Do-Nice-Things-for-Your-Parents-Step-10-Version-3.jpg)
Watch Articles
![how long should research statement be Make Body Oil](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/c/cb/Make-Body-Oil-Step-13.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Make-Body-Oil-Step-13.jpg)
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Do Not Sell or Share My Info
- Not Selling Info
wikiHow Tech Help Pro:
Develop the tech skills you need for work and life
![how long should research statement be ' src=](https://blogs.cornell.edu/wp-content/default-avatar-96.png?r=G)
Associate Professor in Information Science at Cornell and rotating Program Officer in Cyber-Human Systems at NSF.
July 8, 2013, by dan cosley | july 8, 2013, writing a research statement (for a tenure package).
tl/dr : Research statements should demonstrate that you have made or will make an impact through effective, clear storytelling about what you have done and how it connects to your research community. Careful organization and clear evidence of impact can help you make this case to the many different kinds of people who will read your statement.
One of the main docs you write as part of the tenure process is a research statement, and before revising mine, I wanted to spend some time thinking about what makes for an effective statement. We also write these during the job search and various other times during the career, so hopefully this post will have broad appeal. The thoughts below are based on my own thinking, talking with other professors, and looking at my own and other people’s past research statements for tenure [0].
We’ll start with a few key points up front. First, in line with the typical tenure and promotion criteria at research universities [1], a main goal of the statement is to demonstrate that your work has had, and will continue to have, an impact on your research community. So a glorified annotated bibliography of your work is not going to cut it. You need to talk about how your work fits into the broader conversation, why it’s interesting and exciting and important.
Second, as stated by Mor Naaman in a comment on my original tenure post , not everyone who reads your statement (or your dossier [2]) is going to be an expert in your field. So, a glorified annotated bibliography of your work is not going to cut it. Not only do you need to position your work in your community, you need to do this in a way that letter writers, your dean, and faculty across the university will appreciate.
Third, even for those who are experts, they’re not likely to be experts on you, meaning that your research statement has real impact on how and when people think about you [3]. So, a glorified… well, you get the picture, but the key insight here is that the research statement is telling a story about you just as much as it is about the research [4].
So, how do research statement writers go about accomplishing these goals? For the most part, what I saw was a lot of work around organizing the story and showing current impact in ways that was broadly accessible, but less on the questions of ‘so what’ and ‘what next’.
Organizing the story
Based on the statements I looked at, the general approach was to focus on some small number of broad topical themes that represent research questions or areas that people claim to make key contributors to. The work itself is used to illustrate the contributions, possibly with some sub-themes inside the area to help readers group the individual papers. Then, an overall story ties the areas together with some kind of bigger picture and/or longer-term research goals.
How broad the goals, themes, and sub-sections are depends in part on how long you’ve been in the game and how broad your interests are–which implies that your research statement will continue to evolve over time [5]. For instance, my fall 2007 job hunt statement and spring 2011 third year review statements are organized quite differently because I had another 3.5 years of deepening and broadening my work and thinking both on specific projects and on how the different strands tied together [6]. (I wrote a bit about this evolution in “ The Incredible Evolving Research Statement “, which is a reasonable companion to this post.)
Most of the statements were broadly chronological, especially within areas. I think this on balance was used to show the accumulation, evolution, and deepening of one’s own work in an area. Some (including mine), but not all, were also chronological across the areas, which as a reader I saw as illustrating the person’s career arc. None was comprehensive, and some work was left out; instead, the statements focused on telling a more or less coherent story [7].
There are other ways to tell the story of your research besides chronology plus research areas. For instance, I could imagine talking about my own work as a grid where levels of analysis (individual, dyad, group/community) are on one axis and major research area/question (recommendation, user modeling, system-building, reflection) is on the other [8], then positioning work in the grid cells. This would be particularly useful for showing breadth across a couple of intersecting areas, maybe for highlighting interdisciplinarity. If I wanted to emphasize my techy/system-building bits, I could imagine organizing the statement around the systems that I’ve built, supervised, and studies along the way, with research questions emerging as themes that repeatedly occur across the systems [9]. But the overall story plus themes and chronological evolution model feels both fairly common and effective, and I do like the 2011 version a lot — so I’m likely to do an update but not rework of it for the tenure package.
Showing (current) impact
Much of the discourse on this side focused on various forms of evidence that other people, mostly in the academic community, cared about the work.
Most folks worked in some mention of support for their work, notably grant funding. Funding is direct evidence that people think you and your work are interesting enough to spend money on [10]. Yes, this is in your CV, but so are many other things you’ll talk about in the statements, and yes, done to excess or done badly it could feel a little off-putting. But it is honest and valuable to acknowledge support and it is pretty easy to make it part of the story (e.g., “I received an NSF grant to help answer my questions around X”).
Likewise, everyone talked about collaborators and students they’ve worked with. Much as with grants, collaboration says people think you and your work are interesting enough to spend time on [11]. Further, to some extent we’re known by the company that we keep, and collaborating with good people reflects well on you. Again, done as an exercise in name-dropping this could be tedious, but again, it’s easy to work naturally into the conversation–and again, it’s a worthy and honest thing to point out that you had help along the way.
People also mentioned how the work connected to and through groups or workshops they organized, led, and contributed to that are directly related to their research [11a]. To some extent, this overlaps with the service statement , but as with direct collaboration, if people are willing to band together with you it shows that people value the kinds of work that you do and see you as a positive influence.
Some folks talked about citations, h-indices, and other citation metrics. Citations are a proxy for attention, interest, and quality in your work, both the particular work being cited and in your reputation more generally (because well-known and -regarded people are more likely to come to mind). There are some problems with quantitative metrics of scholarly impact: differing practices and sizes across fields affects numbers; not all citations are positive; to do it right you’d probably need to compare to peers’ citation activity; etc. But citations have some value as an indicator of impact [12]. It’s a little harder to weave this in naturally, though you can use the numbers to point out particularly impactful papers, or use the data to give an overview to make the case that your career as a whole has been noticed.
For the most part, those were the high points. I do want to point out that there are lots of other ways one might talk about making impact. I’ll pass the torch to Elizabeth Churchhill’s discussion of impact more generally that among other things riffs off of Judy Olson’s Athena award talk about the many paths to scholarly impact at CSCW 2012 . A group called altmetrics is pushing on other ways to think about impact, and other folks such as danah boyd [13] and Johnny Lee have carved careers out of making impact beyond research papers. These kinds of impact are worth talking about. However, for all that academia is pretty liberal politically, it’s fairly conservative in how it measures impact, and so a diversified portfolio with a fair percentage invested in traditional impact measures is probably less risky.
The statements didn’t have so much to say about potential future impact and work directly. There was sometimes a discussion of the next questions on a current line of work, and sometimes the overarching research question was used to highlight a general next line or lines. I guess this makes sense, because our next research moves are shaped by resources, people, contexts, and events [14], but it was a little surprising given the ‘future continued potential’ part of the tenure evaluation process.
Likewise, there was not as much “so what” as there probably could be, especially. There were reasonable connections to other work at a high level [15], to help make novelty claims and make the ‘so what’ case within the field. But there is much less of an argument about why the work is important to do in the grand scheme of things. This may be in part an artifact of length restrictions (there’s not a formal limit, but most of the tenure-time ones seem to clock in around 4-5 pages plus references). Our values around academic freedom also probably help us out when folks in other fields look at our tenure cases, even if they don’t see obvious indicators of importance, and our external letter writers are probably close enough to our work to appreciate it for its own sake. But I was still surprised at how little this was addressed in our statements.
So, that’s it for now–I should probably stop writing about writing research statements and get on to the business at hand. It was, however, useful spending some time thinking about what might make for a good research statement and hopefully some of this thinking will help future fellow travelers out.
[0] Web search turns up a variety of other useful resources and perhaps I should have just read them rather than writing my own. However, spending some time writing and analyzing myself felt valuable, and most of those I did find seem to be tuned toward research statements for the graduating PhD seeking a job rather than tenure. Many also seem to have been generated by searching for other articles about writing research statements. That said, this article on research statements from Penn’s career services looked useful and had pointers to some examples. Oregon Academic Affairs also has some thoughtful slides on writing tenure statements, including the research statement.
[1] Here’s an example of promotion guidelines from Cornell’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences .
[2] Also part of Cornell ADVANCE’s “Successful Tenure Strategies” document .
[3] I haven’t been on a tenure committee yet, because you don’t get to vote on tenure cases until you have it, but for faculty hiring a number of recommendation letters look a lot like the candidate’s research statement or dissertation proposal/outline. I am guessing similar effects will happen for tenure letter writers.
[4] John Riedl often gave me talk advice that a key takeaway, in addition to the main points, should be that you’re awesome (not via self-aggrandizing–not John’s style–but through being interesting and demonstrating competence). It seems apropos here as well.
[5] Dan Frankowski , a research scientist at GroupLens when I was there, once claimed that the main thing we learn in grad school is how to tell bigger and better stories about the work.
[6] I made a followup post about how these statements evolved with some behind-the-scenes thinking, but this is already a pretty long post in its own right.
[7] It is fine to leave side projects out. A piece of career/tenure advice I have received from multiple sources is that it’s good to become known as “the X guy” for some very small number of X’s (often 1). Thus, focusing on the coherent and compelling story of ($1 to Richard Hamming) You and Your Research is probably best. Your side stuff will be in your CV and your online portfolio, and if people care about them and/or they’ve had an impact, you’ll get to talk about them.
[8] Joe Konstan sometimes talks about the grid as a useful way to organize a research story. For instance, for a dissertation you might try different items on the axes (levels of analysis, research questions, time periods, systems, theories, etc.), and think about a research path that cuts across a column, a row, or (to sample the space) a diagonal. If I were to do this for my tenure case, it feels like most of the cells should be filled in, at least some.
[9] Unless you’re in a clearly systems areas, though, focusing on systems runs the risk of pigeonholing you. You probably want to study recommender systems, not GroupLens; crisis informatics, not Katrina; collaboration, not Wikipedia; crowd work, not Mechanical Turk. I know that some people think of me as a “Wikipedia guy”, and that’s part of my story, but only part.
[10] The contrapositive is not true; if work isn’t funded, it still might be important and impactful. There are lots of ways to not get funding.
[11] Again, the contrapositive isn’t true; some disciplines and traditions value solo research more than my home area of HCI, and some people are just more comfy working alone and don’t seek collaborators.
[11a] Folks who are creating or colonizing quite new areas may find it useful to do a bunch of community-building through workshops, special issues, and the like to build and connect to fellow travelers.
[12] Here, unfortunately, the contrapositive is more plausible: you do want your work to be cited.
[13] Who has enough impact that, at least as I was writing this, if you typo her name to “danah body” Google will give you a “Did you mean: danah boyd”.
[14] FYI, although this is a true answer to kind of “Where do you see yourself in N years” question that you might get asked during a job interview, it is not a good answer. This I can attest from personal experience.
[15] Not many citations though, which was a little surprising, because that could both help ground the work and suggest appropriate tenure letter writers.
Write a Comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
11 Comments
Very helpful – thank you so much for taking the time to share this.
Welcome and hopefully it’s actually useful down the road. If so, feel free to share with your friends. 🙂
thanks a ton. Nice post, great for centering my mind around this daunting task! Merci! -Chris @whiteliesbook
Yeah, good point on making clear what the request is, and when it’s needed. A post on making effective requests would be pretty useful. slope game
Crafting a compelling research statement for the tenure process involves more than just presenting a glorified annotated bibliography. Your emphasis on demonstrating the impact of your work within the broader research community is crucial. The chronological organization of your research reminds me of the online help I got at https://customwriting.com/buy-research-paper resource where experts supported arguments by thematic areas, effectively illustrates the evolution and depth of your contributions. Incorporating evidence of impact, such as grant funding, collaboration, and workshops, adds a layer of validation that extends beyond the academic sphere. While future potential and the broader significance of your work could receive more attention, your insights into constructing an impactful research narrative are valuable for academics.
Writing a Research Statement is a pivotal task for academics and professionals alike. It encapsulates the essence of one’s scholarly pursuits, outlining objectives, methodologies, and anticipated outcomes. Crafting a compelling statement necessitates clarity, conciseness, and coherence. As scholars delve into their areas of expertise, they must articulate their contributions to the field and highlight their unique perspective. Considering the importance of research impact, a well-articulated statement can pave the path for academic success and recognition. Amidst the process, consulting resources like BrainStation reviews can offer valuable insights, aiding in refining the statement and ensuring its effectiveness in communicating the researcher’s vision and potential.
It’s crucial to be aware of the risks associated with publishing personal information online. From identity theft to invasion of privacy, the internet can be a minefield. Just like being cautious about what you eat to maintain good health, being mindful of what you share online is equally important. Remember like rybelsus reviews some things are best kept private to protect yourself from potential harm.
Whether you’re a seasoned bettor or just starting out, it’s crucial to seek reliable advice to enhance your chances of success. One key aspect to consider is utilizing trusted sources for guidance, such as reputable betting forums or expert analysts. Additionally, understanding the intricacies of odds calculation and strategic betting can significantly impact your outcomes. Remember, responsible gambling is paramount, so always gamble within your means and prioritize enjoyment over excessive risk. For guidance on utilizing free betting credits, check out 토토사이트 꽁머니 이용 안내 .
Crafting a compelling research statement is pivotal for tenure consideration, illuminating one’s academic journey and future trajectory. It serves as a roadmap, delineating the evolution of one’s scholarly pursuits and the impact therein. Integral to this narrative is the articulation of novel methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and tangible contributions to the academic landscape. With an eye toward innovation and societal relevance, the statement underscores the transformative potential of the researcher’s endeavors. In this vein, the exploration of emerging paradigms, such as those elucidated in https://borderfreehealth.com/shop/wegovy/ signifies a commitment to advancing knowledge and addressing pressing global challenges.
Great insights on writing a research statement! For those looking to excel in their research projects, consider using a research paper writing service . Assignment Desk offers expert assistance to ensure your research papers are thorough, well-structured, and impactful. Elevate your writing with professional help!
Need assistance with your nursing dissertation in the UK? Our platform provides expert nursing dissertation help tailored to your needs. From topic selection to final proofreading, our team of experienced professionals offers comprehensive support throughout the dissertation writing process. Ensure your dissertation is flawless with our grammar checker UK tool, eliminating errors and improving clarity. Looking for nursing dissertation topics ? Explore a wide range of relevant and engaging topics curated by our experts. Trust our services to deliver top-quality assistance for your nursing dissertation, helping you achieve academic success with confidence.
- Readers who shared this
- For candidates
- For employers
- For members
- English (EN)
- Nederlands (NL)
How to write a research statement
When you are applying for an academic position, you are often requested to write a research statement. A research statement is a document of typically 2-3 pages in which you describe your past, present, and future research.
Your past research experience can detail various projects you have worked on, the skills you learned, the publications that resulted from this work, and how this work was funded. For your present work, you can focus on a brief discussion of how you went from your past experience to your current project, and how it fits within the broader field. For your future work, you can discuss the main research line you would want to develop if you get hired by the institution where you are applying.
Since research statements are quite a standard part of an academic job application process, you can find various examples for different fields online. In this post, I have summarized my eight best tips for you:
1. Ask colleagues for examples
Ask colleagues in your field and at your goal institution for their examples of research statements, so that you get a better feeling of what is expected from you. You may get inspiration from typical examples that are available online, but you need to realize as well that each field and each university have their own preferences.
2. Read the instructions carefully
As with every type of application, you need to make sure you follow the instructions in terms of formatting and length to the letter. If your application does not follow the template, it may be headed for a straight rejection.
3. Explain why your research is important
When you discuss your research experience and plans for the future, make sure you explain the broader importance of your work. Why does your research matter? Which challenge for our society does your research contribute to, in one way or another?
4. Talk about funding and funding potential
Through which institutions have you obtained funding so far? How is your experience in terms of applying for funding? Have you worked in consortia yet in the past? All of these topics can be important to address to let the search committee know that you have experience with obtaining funding, and if you don’t have experience yet, that you have outlined where you will apply and how you will get support to get your proposals checked by somebody who can give you good advice before submission.
5. Write for a broad search committee
Academic search committees may bring together people from various fields, so try to write clearly and avoid jargon. Any person on the committee should be able to understand the topic you are working on, why it matters, and – at large- why you would be a good hire for them.
6. Show consistency in your career
Try to explain how you went from past to current research, and how you plan to continue in the future. This type of consistency does not mean that you need to be working on one single topic your entire research career, but means you show how you have built up skills and how you plan to use these for your future research topics.
7. Set realistic goals for the future
Avoid being vague and setting extremely lofty goals for your future research. Instead, show that you can tackle a realistic topic, based on your career trajectory, but that has significant impact as well. Make it as precise and detailed as possible.
8. Tailor to the institution
Part of being realistic, is tailoring your research statement to the institution as well. It’s tempting to make a single academic job application package and submit the same package to various institutions, but the search committee will notice this quickly. Tailor your application by explaining, for example, how your skills would be complementary to those in the institution, or how the laboratory facilities of this university would be a perfect match for the research you want to carry out.
Recent blog posts
Opportunities and challenges with chatgpt in research, why you should do volunteering during your phd, how to navigate the changing social media landscape as a researcher, tenure track in the netherlands, tips for successful collaborations with government partners, tips for successful collaborations with industry partners, how to compile your publication list, how to develop a publication strategy, how to use x (twitter) as a scientist, centering your teaching around your teaching vision.
- Undergraduate Students
- Masters Students
- PhD/Doctoral Students
- Postdoctoral Scholars
- Faculty & Staff
- Families & Supporters
- Prospective Students
- Explore Your Interests / Self-Assessment
- Build your Network / LinkedIn
- Search for a Job / Internship
- Create a Resume / Cover Letter
- Prepare for an Interview
- Negotiate an Offer
- Prepare for Graduate School
- Find Funding Opportunities
- Prepare for the Academic Job Market
- Search for a Job or Internship
- Advertising, Marketing, and Public Relations
- Arts & Entertainment
- Consulting & Financial Services
- Engineering & Technology
- Government, Law & Policy
- Hospitality
- Management & Human Resources
- Non-Profit, Social Justice & Education
- Retail & Consumer Services
- BIPOC Students & Scholars
- Current & Former Foster Youth
- Disabled Students & Scholars
- First-Generation Students & Scholars
- Formerly Incarcerated Students & Scholars
- International Students & Scholars
- LGBTQ+ Students & Scholars
- Student Athletes
- Students & Scholars with Dependents
- Transfer Students
- Undocumented Students & Scholars
- Women-Identifying Students & Scholars
Research Statements
- Share This: Share Research Statements on Facebook Share Research Statements on LinkedIn Share Research Statements on X
A research statement is used when applying for some academic faculty positions and research-intensive positions. A research statement is usually a single-spaced 1-2 page document that describes your research trajectory as a scholar, highlighting growth: from where you began to where you envision going in the next few years. Ultimately, research productivity, focus and future are the most highly scrutinized in academic faculty appointments, particularly at research-intensive universities. Tailor your research statement to the institution to which you are applying – if a university has a strong research focus, emphasize publications; if a university values teaching and research equally, consider ending with a paragraph about how your research complements your teaching and vice versa. Structures of these documents also varies by discipline. See two common structures below.
Structure One:
Introduction: The first paragraph should introduce your research interests in the context of your field, tying the research you have done so far to a distinct trajectory that will take you well into the future.
Summary Of Dissertation: This paragraph should summarize your doctoral research project. Try not to have too much language repetition across documents, such as your abstract or cover letter.
Contribution To Field And Publications: Describe the significance of your projects for your field. Detail any publications initiated from your independent doctoral or postdoctoral research. Additionally, include plans for future publications based on your thesis. Be specific about journals to which you should submit or university presses that might be interested in the book you could develop from your dissertation (if your field expects that). If you are writing a two-page research statement, this section would likely be more than one paragraph and cover your future publication plans in greater detail.
Second Project: If you are submitting a cover letter along with your research statement, then the committee may already have a paragraph describing your second project. In that case, use this space to discuss your second project in greater depth and the publication plans you envision for this project. Make sure you transition from your dissertation to your second large project smoothly – you want to give a sense of your cohesion as a scholar, but also to demonstrate your capacity to conceptualize innovative research that goes well beyond your dissertation project.
Wider Impact Of Research Agenda: Describe the broader significance of your work. What ties your research projects together? What impact do you want to make on your field? If you’re applying for a teaching-oriented institution, how would you connect your research with your teaching?
Structure Two:
25% Previous Research Experience: Describe your early work and how it solidified your interest in your field. How did these formative experiences influence your research interests and approach to research? Explain how this earlier work led to your current project(s).
25% Current Projects: Describe your dissertation/thesis project – this paragraph could be modeled on the first paragraph of your dissertation abstract since it covers all your bases: context, methodology, findings, significance. You could also mention grants/fellowships that funded the project, publications derived from this research, and publications that are currently being developed.
50% Future Work: Transition to how your current work informs your future research. Describe your next major project or projects and a realistic plan for accomplishing this work. What publications do you expect to come out of this research? The last part of the research statement should be customized to demonstrate the fit of your research agenda with the institution.
Reference management. Clean and simple.
How long are thesis statements? [with examples]
![how long should research statement be How long should a thesis statement be](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/thesis-statement-how-long-400x400.png)
What is the proper length of a thesis statement?
Examples of thesis statements, frequently asked questions about the length of thesis statements, related articles.
If you find yourself in the process of writing a thesis statement but you don't know how long it should be, you've come to right place. In the next paragraphs you will learn about the most efficient way to write a thesis statement and how long it should be.
A thesis statement is a concise description of your work’s aim.
The short answer is: one or two sentences. The more i n-depth answer: as your writing evolves, and as you write longer papers, your thesis statement will typically be at least two, and often more, sentences. The thesis of a scholarly article may have three or four long sentences.
The point is to write a well-formed statement that clearly sets out the argument and aim of your research. A one sentence thesis is fine for shorter papers, but make sure it's a full, concrete statement. Longer thesis statements should follow the same rule; be sure that your statement includes essential information and resist too much exposition.
Here are some basic rules for thesis statement lengths based on the number of pages:
- 5 pages : 1 sentence
- 5-8 pages : 1 or 2 sentences
- 8-13 pages : 2 or 3 sentences
- 13-23 pages : 3 or 4 sentences
- Over 23 pages : a few sentences or a paragraph
Joe Haley, a former writing instructor at Johns Hopkins University exemplified in this forum post the different sizes a thesis statement can take. For a paper on Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, someone could come up with these two theses:
In Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice , gossip is an important but morally ambiguous tool for shaping characters' opinions of each other.
As the aforementioned critics have noted, the prevalence of gossip in Jane Austen's oeuvre does indeed reflect the growing prominence of an explicitly-delineated private sphere in nineteenth-century British society. However, in contrast with these critics' general conclusions about Austen and class, which tend to identify her authorial voice directly with the bourgeois mores shaping her appropriation of the bildungsroman, the ambiguity of this communicative mode in Pride and Prejudice suggests that when writing at the height of her authorial powers, at least, Austen is capable of skepticism and even self-critique. For what is the narrator of her most celebrated novel if not its arch-gossip par excellence ?
Both statements are equally sound, but the second example clearly belongs in a longer paper. In the end, the length of your thesis statement will depend on the scope of your work.
There is no exact word count for a thesis statement, since the length depends on your level of knowledge and expertise. A two sentence thesis statement would be between 20-50 words.
The length of the work will determine how long your thesis statement is. A concise thesis is typically between 20-50 words. A paragraph is also acceptable for a thesis statement; however, anything over one paragraph is probably too long.
Here is a list of Thesis Statement Examples that will help you understand better how long they can be.
As a high school student, you are not expected to have an elaborate thesis statement. A couple of clear sentences indicating the aim of your essay will be more than enough.
Here is a YouTube tutorial that will help you write a thesis statement: How To Write An Essay: Thesis Statements by Ariel Bisset.
![how long should research statement be Thesis conclusion tips](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/thesis-conclusion-tips-400x400.png)
Questions? Call us:
Email:
- How it works
- Testimonials
Essay Writing
- Essay service
- Essay writers
- College essay service
- Write my essay
- Pay for essay
- Essay topics
Term Paper Writing
- Term paper service
- Buy term papers
- Term paper help
- Term paper writers
- College term papers
- Write my term paper
- Pay for term paper
- Term paper topic
Research Paper Writing
- Research paper service
- Buy research paper
- Research paper help
- Research paper writers
- College research papers
- Write my research paper
- Pay for research paper
- Research paper topics
Dissertation Writing
- Dissertation service
- Buy dissertation
- Dissertation help
- Dissertation writers
- College thesis
- Write my dissertation
- Pay for dissertation
- Dissertation topics
Other Services
- Custom writing services
- Speech writing service
- Movie review writing
- Editing service
- Assignment writing
- Article writing service
- Book report writing
- Book review writing
Popular request:
Writing a research statement: how to, tips and tricks.
April 30, 2020
![how long should research statement be research statement](https://ewritingservice.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/research-statement.jpg)
If you are reading this blog post, you are probably interested to learn how to do an excellent job at writing a research statement. In most cases, students need to write this paper as part of their post-undergraduate study application. Even though it sounds like a very complex piece of academic writing, the research statement is certainly not that difficult to write. However, you need to understand what it is and its purpose. Also, you need to learn a few tips and tricks about the writing a statement of research interests. Our advice and information will be extremely valuable, so read on and find answers to all your questions!
Part I: What Is a Research Statement?
Many students are looking for thesis statement examples for research papers, thinking it will help them write a better research statement. There is no need for this. Let’s explain. To do this, we need to start with the beginning: what is a research statement? Basically, it is a short document that presents the main three aspects of your research experience: past, present and future. This document must clearly present your past research to the committee, as well as the research you are currently working on and the research you are interested in pursuing in the near future. Your interests and past experience are of great importance to the committee, so the research problem statement must be clear, concise and very well written.
Part II: The Importance of the Research Statement Paper
Working on your statement of research can take weeks, if not months. And truth be told, creating an impressive research purpose statement takes quite a bit of effort. After all, it is a very important document. Here are some of the reasons why:
- Your research interest statement is reviewed by a commission when you apply for a faculty position, or for various graduate programs.
- The problem statement in research is difficult to write because you need to talk about past, present and future research in the same paper.
- The committee will use the past experience you list in your document to decide if you are a good fit for their institution.
- The research statement clearly describes your interests and your goals. These are always taken into consideration if you are applying for a faculty position.
Part III: Read a Research Statement Example Right Now
We are certain you’ve already tried to find a great research statement sample on the Internet by now. This is, after all, the easiest way to get an idea about how the final document should look like. People who read a correct example are able to write a better academic paper. However, getting your hands on a top quality research statement example has probably proven to be a daunting task. We’ve even seen a statement of research interests sample that lacked a thesis statement. It’s clear that many of the examples you find online are unreliable and – quite frankly – very poorly written.
This is why, considering the importance of this academic paper, we advise you to get professional help. You can learn how to write a thesis statement for a research paper. You can learn how to structure your statement and how to include the most important information. However, can you really write an exceptional paper? Admission committees are extremely strict. They expect nothing short of perfection. With this in mind, your best option is to work closely with a seasoned academic writer to develop an extraordinary paper (and an impressive research paper thesis statement). You want to stand out from the crowd, believe us!
Part IV: Questions, Tips and Tricks
Learning how to write a research statement is not difficult. There are just five sections, so you can safely use the five paragraph essay structure:
- Introduction – describe who you are and why the committee should pay attention to you. Also include the thesis statement for research paper here.
- Past Research – describe the history of your past research. Try to present successful projects as much as possible.
- Present Research – show your audience what research you are currently involved in. What are you trying to solve right now?
- Future Trajectory – what questions do you want to answer next? In what area or areas can the institution you are applying to can help you?
- Conclusion – make sure you make it punchy, but stick to the point.
Reading some great research problem statement examples can help you tremendously. Also, learning as much as possible about the research statement format is advised. However, these steps will not miraculously make you a research statement genius. This is why we advise you to get some assistance from a professional writer .
If you want to do the best possible job all by yourself, make sure you learn how to write research statement from reputable sources. Most people ask us how long should a research statement be. Fortunately, you don’t have to write more than two pages. In most cases, a research statement should be between one and two pages, single-spaced. Depending on the margins you use, this translates to anywhere between 700 and 1,200 words. It’s not a lot of text, but it is extremely important to keep in mind that you must make every word count.
Avoid fluff and filler words. Don’t beat around the bush. Present your past, present and future research projects; impress your audience. That’s it!
![how long should research statement be](https://ewritingservice.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/MLA-2.jpg)
Take a break from writing.
Top academic experts are here for you.
- How To Write An Autobiography Guideline And Useful Advice
- 182 Best Classification Essay Topics To Learn And Write About
- How To Manage Stress In College: Top Practical Tips
- How To Write A Narrative Essay: Definition, Tips, And A Step-by-Step Guide
- How To Write Article Review Like Professional
- Great Problem Solution Essay Topics
- Creating Best Stanford Roommate Essay
- Costco Essay – Best Writing Guide
- How To Quote A Dialogue
- Wonderful Expository Essay Topics
- Research Paper Topics For 2020
- Interesting Persuasive Essay Topics
![how long should research statement be how long should research statement be](https://cdn.paperpal.com/assets/images/paperpal_editage_logo.webp)
How to Write a Research Proposal: (with Examples & Templates)
![how long should research statement be how to write a research proposal](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/pexels-karolina-grabowska-8539429-1-1170x780.jpg)
Table of Contents
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.
Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.
This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.
What is a Research Proposal ?
A research proposal¹ ,² can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.
With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.
Purpose of Research Proposals
A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.
Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³
- To describe the importance of research in the specific topic
- Address any potential challenges you may encounter
- Showcase knowledge in the field and your ability to conduct a study
- Apply for a role at a research institute
- Convince a research supervisor or university that your research can satisfy the requirements of a degree program
- Highlight the importance of your research to organizations that may sponsor your project
- Identify implications of your project and how it can benefit the audience
What Goes in a Research Proposal?
Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.
The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.
The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.
The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.
Research Proposal Example
Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.
![how long should research statement be Research Proposal Template](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Research-proposal-Template-1-2_page-00011-scaled.jpg)
Structure of a Research Proposal
If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹
1. Introduction
This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.
2. Literature review
This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.
3. Objectives
Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.
4. Research design and methodology
Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.
5. Ethical considerations
This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.
6. Budget/funding
Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.
7. Appendices
This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.
8. Citations
![how long should research statement be](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blog-banner_extra.png)
Important Tips for Writing a Research Proposal
Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5
The Planning Stage
- Manage your time efficiently. Plan to have the draft version ready at least two weeks before your deadline and the final version at least two to three days before the deadline.
- What is the primary objective of your research?
- Will your research address any existing gap?
- What is the impact of your proposed research?
- Do people outside your field find your research applicable in other areas?
- If your research is unsuccessful, would there still be other useful research outcomes?
The Writing Stage
- Create an outline with main section headings that are typically used.
- Focus only on writing and getting your points across without worrying about the format of the research proposal , grammar, punctuation, etc. These can be fixed during the subsequent passes. Add details to each section heading you created in the beginning.
- Ensure your sentences are concise and use plain language. A research proposal usually contains about 2,000 to 4,000 words or four to seven pages.
- Don’t use too many technical terms and abbreviations assuming that the readers would know them. Define the abbreviations and technical terms.
- Ensure that the entire content is readable. Avoid using long paragraphs because they affect the continuity in reading. Break them into shorter paragraphs and introduce some white space for readability.
- Focus on only the major research issues and cite sources accordingly. Don’t include generic information or their sources in the literature review.
- Proofread your final document to ensure there are no grammatical errors so readers can enjoy a seamless, uninterrupted read.
- Use academic, scholarly language because it brings formality into a document.
- Ensure that your title is created using the keywords in the document and is neither too long and specific nor too short and general.
- Cite all sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism.
- Make sure that you follow guidelines, if provided. This includes rules as simple as using a specific font or a hyphen or en dash between numerical ranges.
- Ensure that you’ve answered all questions requested by the evaluating authority.
Key Takeaways
Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:
- A research proposal is a document that outlines the details of a proposed study and is created by researchers to submit to evaluators who could be research institutions, universities, faculty, etc.
- Research proposals are usually about 2,000-4,000 words long, but this depends on the evaluating authority’s guidelines.
- A good research proposal ensures that you’ve done your background research and assessed the feasibility of the research.
- Research proposals have the following main sections—introduction, literature review, objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and budget.
![how long should research statement be](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AAP-Banner-3.png)
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?
A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6
- Significance —Does the research address any important subject or issue, which may or may not be specific to the evaluator or university?
- Content and design —Is the proposed methodology appropriate to answer the research question? Are the objectives clear and well aligned with the proposed methodology?
- Sample size and selection —Is the target population or cohort size clearly mentioned? Is the sampling process used to select participants randomized, appropriate, and free of bias?
- Timing —Are the proposed data collection dates mentioned clearly? Is the project feasible given the specified resources and timeline?
- Data management and dissemination —Who will have access to the data? What is the plan for data analysis?
Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?
A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.
Q3. How long should a research proposal be?
A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.
Arts programs | 1,000-1,500 | |
University of Birmingham | Law School programs | 2,500 |
PhD | 2,500 | |
2,000 | ||
Research degrees | 2,000-3,500 |
Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?
A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7
- No clear objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable for the easy understanding among readers.
- Incomplete or unconvincing background research: Background research usually includes a review of the current scenario of the particular industry and also a review of the previous literature on the subject. This helps readers understand your reasons for undertaking this research because you identified gaps in the existing research.
- Overlooking project feasibility: The project scope and estimates should be realistic considering the resources and time available.
- Neglecting the impact and significance of the study: In a research proposal , readers and evaluators look for the implications or significance of your research and how it contributes to the existing research. This information should always be included.
- Unstructured format of a research proposal : A well-structured document gives confidence to evaluators that you have read the guidelines carefully and are well organized in your approach, consequently affirming that you will be able to undertake the research as mentioned in your proposal.
- Ineffective writing style: The language used should be formal and grammatically correct. If required, editors could be consulted, including AI-based tools such as Paperpal , to refine the research proposal structure and language.
Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.
This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.
References
- Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):631-634. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037942/
- Writing research proposals. Harvard College Office of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships. Harvard University. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://uraf.harvard.edu/apply-opportunities/app-components/essays/research-proposals
- What is a research proposal? Plus how to write one. Indeed website. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-proposal
- Research proposal template. University of Rochester Medical Center. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/research/documents/Research-proposal-Template.pdf
- Tips for successful proposal writing. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://research.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tips-for-Successful-Proposal-Writing.pdf
- Formal review of research proposals. Cornell University. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/surveys/survey-assessment-review-group/research-proposals
- 7 Mistakes you must avoid in your research proposal. Aveksana (via LinkedIn). Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-mistakes-you-must-avoid-your-research-proposal-aveksana-cmtwf/
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Related Reads:
- How to Paraphrase Research Papers Effectively
- How to Cite Social Media Sources in Academic Writing?
- What is the Importance of a Concept Paper and How to Write It
APA format: Basic Guide for Researchers
You may also like, how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), five things authors need to know when using..., 7 best referencing tools and citation management software..., maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements.
Unfortunately we don't fully support your browser. If you have the option to, please upgrade to a newer version or use Mozilla Firefox , Microsoft Edge , Google Chrome , or Safari 14 or newer. If you are unable to, and need support, please send us your feedback .
We'd appreciate your feedback. Tell us what you think! opens in new tab/window
Sharing research data
As a researcher, you are increasingly encouraged, or even mandated, to make your research data available, accessible, discoverable and usable.
Sharing research data is something we are passionate about too, so we’ve created this short video and written guide to help you get started.
![how long should research statement be Illustration of two people mining on a globe](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/2i7wxjBWRXnQ10etxnLxBj/9668bd5da79bc1388b54ac287280ee34/Teaser-About-Research-data-video-thumbnail.jpg?fm=webp&w=630&q=75)
Research Data
What is research data.
While the definition often differs per field, generally, research data refers to the results of observations or experiments that validate your research findings. These span a range of useful materials associated with your research project, including:
Raw or processed data files
Research data does not include text in manuscript or final published article form, or data or other materials submitted and published as part of a journal article.
Why should I share my research data?
There are so many good reasons. We’ve listed just a few:
How you benefit
You get credit for the work you've done
Leads to more citations! 1
Can boost your number of publications
Increases your exposure and may lead to new collaborations
What it means for the research community
It's easy to reuse and reinterpret your data
Duplication of experiments can be avoided
New insights can be gained, sparking new lines of inquiry
Empowers replication
And society at large…
Greater transparency boosts public faith in research
Can play a role in guiding government policy
Improves access to research for those outside health and academia
Benefits the public purse as funding of repeat work is reduced
How do I share my research data?
The good news is it’s easy.
Yet to submit your research article? There are a number of options available. These may vary depending on the journal you have chosen, so be sure to read the Research Data section in its Guide for Authors before you begin.
Already published your research article? No problem – it’s never too late to share the research data associated with it.
Two of the most popular data sharing routes are:
Publishing a research elements article
These brief, peer-reviewed articles complement full research papers and are an easy way to receive proper credit and recognition for the work you have done. Research elements are research outputs that have come about as a result of following the research cycle – this includes things like data, methods and protocols, software, hardware and more.
![how long should research statement be Publish icon](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/7m56SMjQvA20m2XEKthGvy/2139cc5081d3582b2f5b5ae1c7dde222/publish.jpg?fm=webp&w=281&q=75)
You can publish research elements articles in several different Elsevier journals, including our suite of dedicated Research Elements journals . They are easy to submit, are subject to a peer review process, receive a DOI and are fully citable. They also make your work more sharable, discoverable, comprehensible, reusable and reproducible.
The accompanying raw data can still be placed in a repository of your choice (see below).
Uploading your data to a repository like Mendeley Data
Mendeley Data is a certified, free-to-use repository that hosts open data from all disciplines, whatever its format (e.g. raw and processed data, tables, codes and software). With many Elsevier journals, it’s possible to upload and store your data to Mendeley Data during the manuscript submission process. You can also upload your data directly to the repository. In each case, your data will receive a DOI, making it independently citable and it can be linked to any associated article on ScienceDirect, making it easy for readers to find and reuse.
![how long should research statement be store data illustration](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/6FhZfcERPd7ork6mHrGf3I/26c551eab73786eea6e05604cbfd2264/store.jpg?fm=webp&w=280&q=75)
View an article featuring Mendeley data opens in new tab/window (just select the Research Data link in the left-hand bar or scroll down the page).
What if I can’t submit my research data?
Data statements offer transparency.
We understand that there are times when the data is simply not available to post or there are good reasons why it shouldn’t be shared. A number of Elsevier journals encourage authors to submit a data statement alongside their manuscript. This statement allows you to clearly explain the data you’ve used in the article and the reasons why it might not be available. The statement will appear with the article on ScienceDirect.
![how long should research statement be declare icon](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/4qqQz5t6Pu8ExJiTP1HtEL/dd4da1d2a3ef1dea74149bba5b88e8f1/declare.jpg?fm=webp&w=281&q=75)
View a sample data statement opens in new tab/window (just select the Research Data link in the left-hand bar or scroll down the page).
Showcasing your research data on ScienceDirect
We have 3 top tips to help you maximize the impact of your data in your article on ScienceDirect.
Link with data repositories
You can create bidirectional links between any data repositories you’ve used to store your data and your online article. If you’ve published a data article, you can link to that too.
![how long should research statement be link icon](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/4ZzPgTm7u0E4Xkc9TPW5ZF/9924d2bc8b58c2b26cf36266784d9429/link.jpg?fm=webp&w=281&q=75)
Enrich with interactive data visualizations
The days of being confined to static visuals are over. Our in-article interactive viewers let readers delve into the data with helpful functions such as zoom, configurable display options and full screen mode.
![how long should research statement be Enrich icon](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/59TEghdwuu5D2Ct2QVIp6T/31228f8035fe1ebe5c4be52f0ad80e3b/enrich.jpg?fm=webp&w=281&q=75)
Cite your research data
Get credit for your work by citing your research data in your article and adding a data reference to the reference list. This ensures you are recognized for the data you shared and/or used in your research. Read the References section in your chosen journal’s Guide for Authors for more information.
![how long should research statement be citation icon](https://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/6tE3VHUAy5P6p1ec7sf7xq/aa7f95bd5e3575b270f32aa0433405c0/citation_3.jpg?fm=webp&w=280&q=75)
Ready to get started?
If you have yet to publish your research paper, the first step is to find the right journal for your submission and read the Guide for Authors .
Find a journal by matching paper title and abstract of your manuscript in Elsevier's JournalFinder opens in new tab/window
Find journal by title opens in new tab/window
Already published? Just view the options for sharing your research data above.
1 Several studies have now shown that making data available for an article increases article citations.
- Accessibility Options:
- Skip to Content
- Skip to Search
- Skip to footer
- Office of Disability Services
- Request Assistance
- 305-284-2374
- High Contrast
- School of Architecture
- College of Arts and Sciences
- Miami Herbert Business School
- School of Communication
- School of Education and Human Development
- College of Engineering
- School of Law
- Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science
- Miller School of Medicine
- Frost School of Music
- School of Nursing and Health Studies
- The Graduate School
- Division of Continuing and International Education
- People Search
- Class Search
- IT Help and Support
- Privacy Statement
- Student Life
- University of Miami
- Division of University Communications
- Office of Media Relations
- Miller School of Medicine Communications
- Hurricane Sports
- UM Media Experts
- Emergency Preparedness
- Awards & Honors
- Career Development
- Press Releases
- Student Scholarships
- Student Spotlight
- More Headlines
- Admissions Events
- Alumni Events
- Continuing Legal Education
- Publications
- Prospective Students
- Faculty & Academics
- Alumni & Giving
- Latest Headlines
- Subscribe to News@TheU Newsletter
- UM NEWS HOME
Tips for Writing Your Master of Legal Studies Personal Statement
![how long should research statement be Tips for Writing Your Master of Legal Studies Personal Statement](https://news.miami.edu/law/_assets/images/images-stories/2024/07/tips-for-writing-your-master-of-legal-studies-statement-940x529.png)
By Miami Law Blog Contributor 07-25-2024
Applying to a Master of Legal Studies (M.L.S.) program is an excellent first step in advancing your legal knowledge in your respective field. Each M.L.S. program sets its own requirements for application and admittance—yet for any graduate-level program, it is common for a personal statement to be required as part of any application.
Read on for practical tips to integrate into your statement, along with common mistakes to avoid.
Understanding the Importance of Your Personal Statement
A personal statement refers to an essay that is typically required as part of a college or graduate program application (most often for advanced degree programs).
The Role of the Personal Statement in Your Application
Personal statements give applicants a unique opportunity to share additional information about themselves that may not already be reflected in their academic transcripts, resumes, or other application materials. In advanced degree programs where spots may be limited, a personal statement could make or break an application.
Preparing to Write Your M.L.S. Personal Statement
As you prepare to write your personal statement, there are a few steps that can make the writing process as easy as possible.
Gathering Necessary Information and Resources
Start by collecting any specific information, resources, or documents you may need to write your M.L.S. personal statement accurately. This is especially essential if you plan on referring to your academic transcripts, awards received, or other formal documents in your text.
Identifying Your Unique Qualities and Experiences
Compelling personal statements tend to be ones that communicate an applicant's distinct experiences and qualities. With this in mind, it is useful to set aside time for self-reflection before you start writing. Specifically, consider the personality traits you have that might make you a good fit for the program. In addition, think about any examples of life experiences that you may want to incorporate into your essay.
Tips for a Successful Personal Statement for Legal Studies
As you begin crafting your Master of Legal Studies personal statement, keep in mind some best practices to help your essay stand out from the dozens (or hundreds) of essays your admissions committee will be reading.
Start With an Outline
When writing any kind of important document, it is wise to start with a detailed outline that includes your thesis, your main points, and any supporting evidence (such as real-world examples or stories). Once you have a solid outline, you may find it considerably easier to start writing.
Be Authentic and Honest
One of the most crucial characteristics of any successful personal statement is authenticity. While there iss nothing wrong with highlighting your strengths and even bragging a bit, you want to avoid dishonesty or anything that might come off as less than genuine.
Highlight Your Interest in Legal Studies
One of the main reasons many M.L.S. programs require a personal statement is because in the first place, the admissions committee wants to truly get to know applicants and what interests them in a legal studies program. Therefore, it is critical to clearly communicate why you want to pursue an M.L.S. degree, whether it is to expand your knowledge in a specific area or advance your career.
Demonstrate Critical Thinking and Analytical Skills
Completing an M.L.S. program requires a great deal of critical thinking, analytical, and problem-solving skills. You can demonstrate how you possess these skills in your personal statement by sharing specific stories or examples of situations where you have been required to think outside of the box or make an important, calculated decision.
Avoid Common Pitfalls and Cliches
There are certain phrases and tropes that M.L.S. admissions committees have probably seen in personal statements hundreds of times already, so it is ideal to avoid these in your writing. Try to ensure every sentence is truly unique and not something you would find in other essays—or that could be easily upstaged by other applicants. A few examples of content and cliches to avoid could include:
- Discussing legal topics or issues that might be controversial.
- Focusing too much on the external world or other people instead of your own goals and experiences.
- Starting with a quote, statistic, abstract question, or anything else that directs the attention away from you .
- Leaning too heavily into sharing personal hardships (particularly cliches like a sports injury) to prove how you have overcome struggles.
- Pulling from scenarios in the distant past (such as how you learned to be a team player in high school extracurriculars or opening with, “My passion for legal matters began at a young age…”)
Showcase Your Unique Experience
Everybody has something different to bring to the table, but your admissions committee will not understand the scope of your personal experience unless you address it in your personal statement. If you have relevant work experience, a background in legal education, or something else that sets you apart, be sure to weave it into your M.L.S. personal statement.
Emphasize Your Motivation for Pursuing a Master of Legal Studies
People have various motivations for obtaining an M.L.S. degree. Your personal statement is your chance to highlight your own reasons for wanting to pursue this degree. Remember that your reasoning should not be all about you , so it can be useful to consider how earning your M.L.S. might help others or even contribute to the field as a whole.
Highlight Your Academic Achievements
Even if your academic achievements are already covered in an academic transcript, resume, or other application materials, your M.L.S. personal statement can be an opportunity to succinctly call out anything noteworthy or particularly relevant that might not be immediately apparent in those documents. Ideally, you can connect these achievements to a personal story or anecdote in your essay.
Incorporate Your Future Goals
Take time to reflect on your short- and long-term goals as well as how obtaining an M.L.S. degree may help you pursue those goals. This is something you'll also want to cover in your personal statement, most likely toward the end of the document.
Be Open to Feedback from Peers
One of the best things you can do when creating your personal statement is to get feedback from peers. After you have finished your first draft, do not hesitate to ask family members, mentors, or trusted friends to read through your essay and make comments. This can be an excellent way to gain and incorporate valuable feedback that could strengthen your essay even more.
Take the Time to Proofread
Even with built-in spell checkers in most word processing software today, it is still crucial to actually read through your essay and do your own proofreading before submitting your personal statement. A helpful rule of thumb is to read through the document twice: The first time, read it out loud to check for flow and grammatical errors. The second time, read it backwards to better spot typos and misspellings.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
As you work on your personal statement for your M.L.S., you’ll also want to make note of some errors to avoid.
Being Too Vague or Generic
In many cases, your personal statement is your one opportunity to really make your application stand out—so make sure to avoid language that is overly vague or generic. Instead, refer to specific life experiences and the unique qualities you would carry into a graduate-level program.
Overloading on Legal Jargon
As tempting as it may be to flaunt your knowledge of legal jargon in your Master of Legal Studies personal statement, remember that the admissions committee members reading your essay might not be in the legal field. With this in mind, it is best to stick with simple language regarding the law. There is nothing wrong with incorporating a few common legal terms here and there, but this is not the time to overdo it with the terminology.
Ignoring the Prompt or Instructions
One of the biggest mistakes applicants make when crafting a personal statement is ignoring the prompt and going in their own direction. Oftentimes, writing prompts will include specific questions to answer or topics to address. Failing to closely adhere to the prompt may demonstrate to your admissions committee that you are not detail-oriented or do not follow directions carefully.
How Long Should My Personal Statement Be?
Generally speaking, most personal statements should be at least a page or 500 words long, but this will all depend on your program's specific guidelines regarding word counts, page limits, spacing, and font sizes.
How Do I Start My Personal Statement?
The best way to start a personal statement is with a "hook," or something that will capture your readers' attention and interest. Many applicants find success beginning their essays with a personal anecdote, a question, or even a surprising fact.
What Topics Should I Avoid in My Personal Statement?
Try to steer clear of any taboo topics that might stir up controversy (e.g., politics and religion), as you never know who might be reading your essay. Additionally, avoid discussing personal struggles that lack a clear, relevant resolution or lesson. Lastly, do not include information that is redundant with skills, accomplishments, or credentials already clearly listed on your resume or transcripts; put a spin on it so you are sharing a personal story, insight, or competency that the reader could not glean from your application elsewhere.
How Can I Make My Personal Statement Stand Out?
There are plenty of ways to set your personal statement apart from other essays, such as incorporating personal anecdotes and experiences while tying them back to your motivation for applying. The more creative yet authentic you remain, the more memorable and compelling your essay will be to the admissions committee reading it.
Ready to Apply for a Master of Legal Studies Program?
Ultimately, writing an M.L.S. personal statement is all about reflecting upon why you are interested in the program and what might set you apart from other applicants. By following the above tips and best practices, you will be in better shape when it comes time to write your personal statement for legal studies.
Are you seeking the right online Master of Legal Studies degree program for you? Learn more about the University of Miami School of Law's online M.L.S. curriculum with tracks in human resources, cybersecurity, finance, and more—then get started with your online application today.
https://admissions.law.miami.edu/academics/mls/
https://admissions.law.miami.edu/academics/mls/curriculum/
https://lifehacker.com/think-backwards-when-proofreading-your-writing-for-spel-1793189994
Campus Visit Reservation Form
Learn about us, j.d., ll.m., and s.j.d., get started.
![how long should research statement be University of Miami Split U logo](https://cdn.miami.edu/_assets-common/images/system/um-logo-gray-bg.png)
University of Miami School of Law
- 1311 Miller Drive Coral Gables , FL 33146
- [email protected]
- Current Students
- Careers - OCPD
Quick Links
- Academic Calendar - Law School
- Academic Calendar - University
- Events Calendar
Communications
- For the Media
- Web Feedback
- ABA Required Disclosures
- Policies & Privacy Statements
- Visiting the Law School
- Parking & Transportation
- social-facebook
- social-twitter
- social-youtube
- social-instagram
- social-linkedin
- social-threads
Copyright: 2024 University of Miami. All Rights Reserved. Emergency Information Privacy Statement & Legal Notices Title IX & Gender Equity Website Feedback
Individuals with disabilities who experience any technology-based barriers accessing the University’s websites or services can visit the Office of Workplace Equity and Inclusion .
![how long should research statement be Cart](https://hbr.org/resources/css/images/cart-icon.png)
- SUGGESTED TOPICS
- The Magazine
- Newsletters
- Managing Yourself
- Managing Teams
- Work-life Balance
- The Big Idea
- Data & Visuals
- Reading Lists
- Case Selections
- HBR Learning
- Topic Feeds
- Account Settings
- Email Preferences
Research: How Passion Can Backfire at Work
- Erica R. Bailey,
- Kai Krautter,
- Adam D. Galinsky,
- Jon M. Jachimowicz
![how long should research statement be how long should research statement be](https://hbr.org/resources/images/article_assets/2024/07/Jul24_24_1433147316.jpg)
And how managers should handle this double-edged sword.
Passion has long been championed as a key to workplace success. However, scientific studies have found mixed results: On the one hand, some studies find evidence that passionate employees tend to perform better, while other research has documented null or even negative effects on performance. What’s the root of these inconsistent findings surrounding passion? And how can we reap the benefits of passion without falling prey to its downsides? Through a series of studies with more than 1,000 employees from the U.S. and China, researchers shed light on these questions by showing that passion is associated with overconfidence in our own performance. Although this passion-driven overconfidence is not necessarily harmful — and in certain contexts, it may even be helpful — their findings suggest that managers should take steps to mitigate the potential negative consequences of the overconfidence that may go hand in hand with passion.
From business leaders to athletes to everyday employees, passion is often cited as a key ingredient in the success of high achievers. Consider Elon Musk, whose passion is undeniable. He followed this drive and went on to popularize electric cars through Tesla and reinvigorate space transportation via SpaceX.
![how long should research statement be how long should research statement be](https://hbr.org/resources/css/images/hmm/HBR-learning-icon.png)
- EB Erica R. Bailey is an Assistant Professor in the Management of Organizations group at the Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley. Her research primarily focuses on authenticity and the self, asking questions like, how do we define who we are? When do we experience that sense of self in everyday life? What barriers prevent us from sharing that self fully with others?
- KK Kai Krautter is a PhD student in the Organizational Behavior Unit at the Harvard Business School. His research interests revolve around maintaining passion for work over time as well as flexibility in extraversion between different situations.
- WW Wen Wu is a professor at School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University. His research focuses on leadership, emotions, and employee proactivity.
- Adam D. Galinsky is the chair of the Management Division at the Columbia Business School. He co-authored the critically acclaimed and best-selling book, Friend & Foe (Penguin Random House, 2015), and delivered a popular TED talk, How to Speak Up for Yourself .
- Jon M. Jachimowicz is an assistant professor in the Organizational Behavior Unit at the Harvard Business School. He received his PhD in management from Columbia Business School. He studies how people pursue their passion for work, how they perceive passion in others, and how leaders and organizations seek to manage for passion.
Partner Center
![how long should research statement be U.S. flag](https://www.secretservice.gov/profiles/usssd8_gov/themes/custom/af1/assets/uswds/img/us_flag_small.png)
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
![how long should research statement be Go to United States Secret Service home page|t](https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023-star-flag.png)
Information on the 2024 Campaign is available now. Click here to find out more.
Written Testimony from Director Kimberly Cheatle to the Oversight Committee on the Attempted Assassination of Former President Trump
Good morning, Chairman Comer, Ranking Member Raskin, and distinguished members of the Committee.
My name is Kimberly Cheatle, and I am the Director of the United States Secret Service. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today. Last week, I provided a briefing to both chambers of Congress, and I am here today to answer your questions to the best of my ability.
The assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump on July 13th is the most significant operational failure at the Secret Service in decades and I am keeping him and his family in my thoughts. I would like to offer my sincerest condolences to the family of Corey Comperatore, a former fire chief and a hero, who was killed in this senseless shooting. I would also like to acknowledge those who were injured in Butler, Pennsylvania, David Dutch and James Copenhaven, and I wish them a speedy recovery.
I would be remiss if I did not also extend my condolences on the passing of your colleague, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee. Ms. Jackson Lee was always engaged in the oversight of the Secret Service and her passing is a great loss to this body.
The Secret Service’s solemn mission is to protect our nation’s leaders. On July 13th, we failed. As the Director of the United States Secret Service, I take full responsibility for any security lapse. As an agency, we are fully cooperating with the FBI’s investigation, the oversight you have initiated here, and conducting our own internal mission assurance review at my direction. Likewise, we will cooperate with the pending external review and the DHS Office of the Inspector General.
We must learn what happened and I will move heaven and earth to ensure an incident like July 13th does not happen again. Thinking about what we should have done differently is never far from my thoughts.
The Secret Service currently protects 36 individuals on a daily basis, as well as world leaders who visit the United States, like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who arrived in Washington today.
At the outset, let me state unequivocally: Nothing I have said previously should be interpreted to place blame for this failure on our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners who supported the Secret Service in Butler, Pennsylvania. We could not do our job without them.
An assassination attempt on a Secret Service protectee is the worst nightmare for the men and women who work around the clock every day of every year to prevent such attacks from happening in the first place. Throughout our 159-year history, assassination attempts have been made, uncovered, and thwarted on those we protect. Our agents, officers, and support personnel understand that every day we are expected to sacrifice our lives to execute a no fail mission.
As witnessed on July 13th, our special agents shielded former President Trump with their own bodies on-stage while shots were being fired, selflessly willing to make the ultimate sacrifice without hesitation. I am proud beyond words of the actions taken by the former president’s detail, the counter-sniper team that neutralized the gunman, and the tactical team that provided cover during the evacuation.
I will be transparent as possible as I speak with you, understanding that at times, I may be limited in providing a thorough response in this open setting due to risks associated with sharing highly sensitive protective methodologies. There are multiple ongoing investigations into this incident, hundreds of people to interview, and thousands of documents to review. I do not want to inadvertently provide you today with inaccurate information. I may not be able to speak specifically to certain items that have circulated over the past nine days.
Since January 1, 2024, we have successfully secured over 7,500 sites. It is important to note that no two events are the same. Every protective advance comes with its own set of challenges and requires a customized mitigation strategy including specific assets, personnel, and technology.
During every advance, we attempt to strike a balance between enabling the protectee to be visible and our protective requirements to be secure. I know this because I have spent 29 years in this agency.
I came up through the ranks: I’ve secured events for every president since President Clinton, supervised on VP Cheney’s detail, led our training center, oversaw all investigations and protective visits in the state of Georgia, supervised on VP Biden’s detail and oversaw the agency’s entire protective mission during the Trump Administration.
The comprehensive advance process involves collaborative planning between the Secret Service, the protectee’s staff, and our local law enforcement partners. Planning for this event began shortly after it was announced on July 3. The former President, like the current President, is subject to multiple threats at any moment in time. The level of security provided for the former President increased well before the campaign and has been steadily increasing as threats evolve. The security plan included a full assessment of the Butler Farm showgrounds to identify security vulnerabilities and craft a security plan for our protectee, attendees, and the public.
The Secret Service constructed a security plan which consisted of three concentric rings of protection – the inner, middle, and outer perimeter – which are protected by Secret Service personnel in conjunction with our law enforcement partners.
Security plans are multi-layered, providing 360 degrees of protection. These layers include personnel, technical, and tactical assets which are a force multiplier for our protective posture.
Our methodology helps us deploy security assets to meet specific challenges posed by different areas of a protective site. While the assets deployed in each protection ring differ, each one is of equal priority from a security perspective.
The Secret Service could not do our job without partnerships, whether that is with DoD to move presidential and vice-presidential assets, or local partners securing motorcade routes – we rely on the relationship built over years of working together to secure events and conduct investigations.
We bring a multitude of tactical assets that range from Counter Snipers, Counter Surveillance, Counter Assault, K-9, Technical Security personnel and Intelligence teams, who are working collaboratively to ensure cohesion between all entities.
Immediately following the assassination attempt, I directed the activation of my Crisis Center and assembled my executive team to begin surging more protective resources to the former President and to ensure the wellness of our people post incident, all while securing an active crime scene. I immediately ordered a re-evaluation of the Republican National Convention security plan and increased the security posture in the National Capital Region for all permanent protectees and sites. At the same time, I initiated a mission assurance investigation within the agency.
I have instructed my team that all necessary resources will be dedicated to investigating these matters. We will not rest until we have explored every option, and we will leave no stone left unturned. But I want to be clear – I am not waiting for these investigations to be completed prior to making changes.
The job of a special agent is highly competitive, and only 2 percent of our applicants make it through the hiring process. From the moment I became Director, I have been focused on resourcing our personnel, obtaining technology, increasing staffing levels, and evaluating our hiring processes and training facilities. I am proud that this year we had a net gain of over 200 special agents.
Over the past two weeks, we successfully led the planning and execution of the 75th NATO Summit and the Republican National Convention. Over the next few months, we will implement the security plans for the Democratic National Convention, the UN General Assembly, and have already begun planning and coordinating the 2025 Inauguration. It is now more important than ever for the men and women of the Secret Service to remain resilient and to focus on what is necessary to carry out our critical mission.
Our agency needs to be adequately resourced in order to serve our current mission requirements and to anticipate future requirements. The heightened and dynamic threat environment, detailed in the September DHS Homeland Security Threat assessment and subsequent warnings by DHS and the FBI that the threat landscape was elevated, shows no signs of abating. The coming years will bring another Presidential campaign, the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games – which have been designated as a National Special Security Event, and thousands of events in between. I have no doubt that the processes I’ve implemented over the past 20 months as Director, in addition to my nearly 30 years of experience at this agency, have positioned the agency to be stronger.
Our mission is not political. It is literally a matter of life and death, as the tragic events on July 13th remind us. I have full confidence in the men and women of the Secret Service. They are worthy of our support in executing our protective mission.
Chairman Comer, Ranking Member Raskin, and members of the Committee, I will now answer any questions the Committee may have.
- Annual Reports
- Strategic Plan
- 150+ Years of History
- The Evolution of Our Badges
- Wall of Honor
- Protecting Leaders
- Safeguarding Places
- Securing Events
- National Threat Assessment Center
- Counterfeit Investigations
- Financial Investigations
- Cyber Investigations
- Forensic Expertise
- Most Wanted Fugitives
- Seeking Information
- Avoid Scams
- Mission Support
- Campaign 2024
- Behind the Shades
- Press Releases
- Speeches and Testimony
- Social Media
- Standing Post
- Special Agent
- Special Agent Talent & Achievement Recruitment
- Special Operations Division - Counter Assault Team
- Uniformed Division Officer
- Technical Law Enforcement
- Administrative, Professional and Technical
- Student Employment
- Career Events
- Employee & Family Support
- Field Offices
Kamala Harris' stepdaughter responds to 'childless' attack from JD Vance: 'I love my three parents'
![how long should research statement be Doug Emhoff, Ella and Cole smile standing next to each other](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-560w,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2024-07/240725-kamala-harris-stepchildren-ella-cole-emhoff-se-121p-824d63.jpg)
Doug Emhoff’s daughter and ex-wife criticized Ohio GOP Sen. JD Vance after comments he once made referring to Vice President Kamala Harris as childless re-emerged.
During a 2021 interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News, Vance — now former President Donald Trump’s running mate — said Harris was one of the “childless cat ladies” who “want to make the rest of the country miserable too.” Vance added, “If you look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez], the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children.”
Follow along for live updates on the 2024 election
Harris is stepmother to Emhoff’s two children, Ella and Cole, who refer to the vice president as “Momala.”
In a statement to NBC News, Kerstin Emhoff called Vance’s attacks “baseless,” adding: “For over 10 years, since Cole and Ella were teenagers, Kamala has been a co-parent with Doug and I. She is loving, nurturing, fiercely protective, and always present. I love our blended family and am grateful to have her in it.”
Ella Emhoff, 25, posted a screenshot on her Instagram story in support of her mother’s statement, adding, “How can you be ‘childless’ when you have cutie pie kids like Cole and I?”
![how long should research statement be A screenshot of Ella Emhoff Instagram story reads "How can you be 'childless' you have cutie pie kids like cole and I" and "I love my three parents"](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-760w,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2024-07/240725-ella-emhoff-IG-story-se-124p-9c582e.jpg)
She also tagged her mother’s Instagram handle, writing, “Say it louder for the people in the back.”
At the bottom of the image, Ella Emhoff wrote, “I love my three parents.”
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who now has two children, also criticized Vance’s comments, saying in an interview with CNN earlier this week, “The really sad thing is, he said that after Chasten and I had been through a fairly heartbreaking setback in our adoption journey. He couldn’t have known that, but maybe that’s why you shouldn’t be talking about other people’s children.”
“It’s about ... people’s families whose well-being will depend on whether we go into a future led by somebody like Kamala Harris who is focused on expanding the prosperity and the freedom, the well-being of our families,” Buttigieg added.
The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
![how long should research statement be](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_focal-60x60,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2024_28/3654611/240613-alexandra-sasha-marquez.jpg)
Alexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
![how long should research statement be](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_focal-60x60,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2018_49/2674606/140225-peter-alexander.jpg)
Peter Alexander is chief White House correspondent for NBC News.
![](http://earnmoneybangla.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The research statement is a common component of a potential candidate's application for post-undergraduate study. This may include applications for graduate programs, post-doctoral fellowships, or faculty positions. The research statement is often the primary way that a committee determines if a candidate's interests and past experience make them a good fit for their program/institution.
A research statement is a one to three page document that may be required to apply for an . academic job or (less frequently) graduate school. The purpose of a research statement is to
We've looked at the Cover Letter and the CV and the Teaching Statement.Today we look at the Research Statement. An expanded and updated version of this post can now be found in Chapter 27 of my book, The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. Into a Job. Today, at long last, and in response to popular demand, a post on the Research Statement.
Cornell University is located on the traditional homelands of the Gayogo̱hó꞉nǫ Ɂ (the Cayuga Nation). The Gayogo̱hó꞉nǫ Ɂ are members of the Hodinǫ̱hsǫ́:nih Confederacy, an alliance of six sovereign Nations with a historic and contemporary presence on this land. The Confederacy precedes the establishment of Cornell University, New York state, and the United States of America.
The Purpose of a Research Statement. The main goal of a research statement is to walk the search committee through the evolution of your research, to highlight your research accomplishments, and to show where your research will be taking you next.
Your research statement should describe your previous experience, how that experience will facilitate your graduate education in our department, and why you are choosing to pursue graduate education in our department.
Contact (212) 817-7425 [email protected] Join our email lists. Location. The Graduate Center, CUNY 365 Fifth Avenue, Room 3300.08 New York, NY 10016
A research statement is a critical document for prospective faculty applicants. In it, applicants seek to convey to their future colleagues the importance and impact of their past and, most importantly, future research. Here, we share tips on how to make your research statement shine.
Some tips on how to write a research statement (and my own statement as a sample!)
Writing a research statement by Michael Ernst December, 2011 Last updated: March 29, 2016 . A research statement lays out your vision of your research, including both your accomplishments to date and your plans for the future.
Writing a research statement happens many times throughout a research career. Often for the first time it happens when applying to Ph.D. programs or applying to fellowships. Later, you will be writing postdoc and faculty applications. These documents are challenging to write because they seek to capture your entire research career in one document that
Research statements are a frequent component of the academic job market application portfolio and one of the more field-specific documents. In a research statement, you are explaining to the search committee your scholarly profile, research agenda, impact of your work, and how your scholarship fits ...
Research institutions increasingly request that applicants for academic positions involving a significant percentage of research time include a research statement with other application materials.
I am applying to a faculty position that emphasizes both research and undergraduate teaching. The application asks for a research statement and a teaching statement.I realize that both documents are usually recommended to be 1-2 pages long and that you should always err on the side of brevity.
The research statement is a very common component of job applications in academia. The statement provides a summary of your research experience, interests, and agenda for reviewers to use to assess your candidacy for a position.
tl/dr: Research statements should demonstrate that you have made or will make an impact through effective, clear storytelling about what you have done and how it connects to your research community.Careful organization and clear evidence of impact can help you make this case to the many different kinds of people who will read your statement.
When you are applying for an academic position, you are often requested to write a research statement. A research statement is a document of typically 2-3 pages in which you describe your past, present, and future research.
Copyright © 2012 Office of Career & Professional Development, University of California, San Francisco career.ucsf.edu Note that in all cases you should include an ...
A research statement is used when applying for some academic faculty positions and research-intensive positions. A research statement is usually a single-spaced 1-2 page document that describes your research trajectory as a scholar, highlighting growth: from where you began to where you envision going in the next few years.
Title: Microsoft Word - Writing a Research Statement for the Job Market.docx Created Date: 5/4/2016 6:08:33 PM
Research is a systematic investigative process employed to increase or revise current knowledge by discovering new facts. It can be divided into two general categories: (1) Basic research, which is inquiry aimed at increasing scientific knowledge, and (2) Applied research, which is effort aimed at using basic research for solving problems or developing new processes, products, or techniques.
What is the proper length of a thesis statement? The short answer is: one or two sentences. The more in-depth answer: as your writing evolves, and as you write longer papers, your thesis statement will typically be at least two, and often more, sentences. The thesis of a scholarly article may have three or four long sentences.
Learn what a research statement is and why it is so important. Here is how to write a research statement in record time and impress any committee.
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers' plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed ...
Definition of research data and overview of the different options to share data: store, link, enrich, publish, declare
Applying to a Master of Legal Studies (M.L.S.) program is an excellent first step in advancing your legal knowledge in your respective field. Each M.L.S. program sets its own requirements for application and admittance—yet for any graduate-level program, it is common for a personal statement to be required as part of any application.
Summary. Passion has long been championed as a key to workplace success. However, scientific studies have found mixed results: On the one hand, some studies find evidence that passionate employees ...
Good morning, Chairman Comer, Ranking Member Raskin, and distinguished members of the Committee. My name is Kimberly Cheatle, and I am the Director of the United States Secret Service. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today. Last week, I provided a briefing to both chambers of Congress, and I am here today to answer your questions to the best of my ability.
The rooftop where a gunman shot at former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally was identified by the Secret Service as a potential vulnerability in the days before the event, two sources ...
Ella Emhoff's mother, Kerstin Emhoff, also responded to Vance's 2021 remarks, which referred to the vice president as one of the "childless cat ladies" running the country.