systematic quantitative literature reviews

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

The best reviews synthesize studies to draw broad theoretical conclusions about what a literature means, linking theory to evidence and evidence to theory. This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information.

Appropriate methods for quantitative data with or without meta-analysis, including identification and discussion of heterogeneity. ... The PROSPERO record documents protocols for all types of reviews except literature and scoping reviews. ... This article has been published simultaneously in BMC Systematic Reviews, Acta Anaesthesiologica ...

This short video introduces viewers to a powerful 15 step method for undertaking and publishing literature reviews including by those new to the discipline. It is the first in a series of four videos on the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review providing an overview of the method in outlined in: Pickering, C.M. and Byrne, J. (2014).

So what about using a systematic quantitative literature review? 1. Systematic = methods to survey literature and select papers to include are explicit and reproducible 2. Quantitative = measure of the amount (number of papers) of research within different sections of topic 3.

A general literature review starts with formulating a research question, defining the population, and conducting a systematic search in scientific databases, steps that are well-described elsewhere. 1,2,3 Once students feel confident that they have thoroughly combed through relevant databases and found the most relevant research on the topic ...

A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, ... The quantitative analysis can make use of data categorized, labelled, or coded in the extraction form (see Section 1.6). This data can be transformed into numerical values to perform ...

There is some evidence to support the use of checking reference lists to complement literature search in systematic reviews. Low: S: additional yield by publication type, study design or both and data pertaining to costs ... Narrative and quantitative syntheses are the two most commonly used approaches for synthesizing data in evidence ...

Cite this article: Lame, G. (2019) 'Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction', in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019. DOI:10.1017/ ... studies are pooled together in a quantitative analysis, this is called meta-analysis. 8. Interpret results: ...

Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews? ... Vedel I. (2016). Opening-up the definition of systematic literature review: The plurality of worldviews, methodologies and methods for reviews and syntheses. Journal of ...

Public health and health service interventions are typically complex: they are multifaceted, with impacts at multiple levels and on multiple stakeholders. Systematic reviews evaluating the effects of complex health interventions can be challenging to conduct. This paper is part of a special series of papers considering these challenges particularly in the context of WHO guideline development.

This method is a more straightforward and systematic approach than the traditional 'narrative method' common to many student theses. When published, this type of review can also complement existing narrative reviews produced by experts in a field by quantitatively assessing the literature, including identifying research gaps.

Mixed studies review/mixed methods review: Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

Mixed methods reviews. As one reason for the growth in qualitative synthesis is what they can add to quantitative reviews, it is not surprising that there is also growing interest in mixed methods reviews. This reflects similar developments in primary research in mixing methods to examine the relationship between theory and empirical data which ...

A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, ... The quantitative analysis can make use of data categorized, labelled, or coded in the extraction form (see Section 1.6). This data can be transformed into numerical values to perform ...

Systematic = methods to survey literature and select papers to include are explicit and reproducible. 2. Quantitative = measure of the amount (number of papers) of research within different sections of topic. 3. Comprehensive = assesses different combinations of locations, subjects, variables and responses. 4.

Our research project was an exploration using a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) method to better understand the way regulatory failure, caused by overlapping regulations, has featured in academic literature. The SQLR method was chosen as it employs a systematic process to consolidate a sample of literature, and quantitative ...

perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education. 40:10, 1756‐1769 • Pickering, C., Johnson, M. and Byrne, J. (2021). Using systematic quantitative literature reviews for urban analysis.

A systematic review collects all possible studies related to a given topic and design, and reviews and analyzes their results [ 1 ]. During the systematic review process, the quality of studies is evaluated, and a statistical meta-analysis of the study results is conducted on the basis of their quality. A meta-analysis is a valid, objective ...

Overview. sqlr is an R package that provides a system to produce systematic quantitative literature reviews, a systematic review method presented by Catherine Pickering and Jason Byrne in 2014. Its aim is to facilitate the work of PhD candidates and other early-career researchers with evidence synthesis and to improve reproducibility in research.

The systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) is a method for undertaking literature reviews, based on the key principles of rigour, comprehensiveness, and repeatability. The method has 15 steps that begin with ideation and conceptualisation, proceeding to searching databases, coding papers, analysing patterns and trends, and then ...

A systematic review follows explicit methodology to answer a well-defined research question by searching the literature comprehensively, evaluating the quantity and quality of research evidence rigorously, and analyzing the evidence to synthesize an answer to the research question. The evidence gathered in systematic reviews can be qualitative ...

Overall, while both literature reviews and systematic reviews involve reviewing existing research literature, systematic reviews adhere to more rigorous and transparent methods to minimize bias and provide robust evidence to inform decision-making in education and other fields. If you are interested in learning about other evidence synthesis ...

This article conducts a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) to provide a principled, comprehensive and reproducible synthesis of research into L2 aptitude published over the last 60 years (1959-2019). In this SQLR, close to one hundred journal articles and PhD dissertations were examined to discern generalisations and limitations ...

Using the systematic quantitative literature review method, we seek to provide an overview of English-written peer-reviewed journal articles on desistance from 2011 to 2020. Analysis of 196 studies reveals that despite an almost equal quantitative-qualitative divide in desistance research, there is skewness in terms of research location ...

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed additional and specific challenges on the lives and wellbeing of informal unpaid carers. Addressing an important gap in the existing literature, this systematic review (prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42022376012) synthesises and evaluates the quantitative evidence examining the association between unpaid caregiving and mental health (compared to non ...

The association between chronic tobacco smoking and these neurocognitive impairments support the findings of the literature review conducted by Campos et al. and of the ... Davies SR, Dawson S, Grimshaw JM, et al. Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions. BMJ Glob Health. (2019) 4:e000858. doi: 10 ...

Employing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, the study reveals three key findings. Firstly, a systematic literature review highlights a dearth of research on the social and economic aspects of utilizing biomethane gas, particularly in modeling contexts. Secondly, through case studies, the utilization of methane gas as an energy ...