Software industry experiments: A systematic literature review

Ieee account.

  • Change Username/Password
  • Update Address

Purchase Details

  • Payment Options
  • Order History
  • View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

  • Communications Preferences
  • Profession and Education
  • Technical Interests
  • US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
  • Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
  • Contact & Support
  • About IEEE Xplore
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Nondiscrimination Policy
  • Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Software industry experiments: A systematic literature review

Profile image of mauro diego martinez

2013, 2013 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI)

Related Papers

Amela Karahasanovic , Tore Dybå

literature review on software industry

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Amela Karahasanovic

Information and Software Technology

Claes Wohlin

Journal of Computer Science

Henrique Vignando

Journal of Systems and Software

Dag Sjøberg

Miguel Goulão

Systematic reviews on software engineering literature have shown an insufficient experimental validation of claims, when compared to the standard practice in other well established sciences. Poor validation of software engineering claims increases the risks of introducing changes in the software process of an organization, as the potential benefits assessment is based on hype, rather than on facts. The software engineering community lacks widely disseminated experimental best practices. This paper contributes with a model of the experimental software engineering process that captures the best practices in the area and is aligned with recent proposals for experimental data dissemination. This process model can be used either as a support in the definition of software engineering experiments or in conducting comparisons among experiment results.

Manoel Mendonça

ESEM 2010 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Per Runeson

Vilmar Nepomuceno , Larissa Falcão

Context: Researchers perform experiments to check their proposals under controlled conditions. Thus, experiments are an important category of empirical studies and are the classical approach for identifying cause-effect relationships. Goal: Quantitatively characterize and analyze the controlled experiments in software engineering published in journal and conference proceedings over the decade 2003-2013. Method: We performed a systematic mapping study that includes all full papers published at EASE, ESEM and ESEJ. Results: We obtained 110 papers that report controlled experiments. In these experiments we obtained quantitative data about authors and institutions, subjects, tasks, environment, replication and threats to validity. Conclusions: The main contribution of this work is to show the amount of experiments published in the three main venues of Empirical Software Engineering between the years 2003-2013 and also how these experiments have being reported and executed.

RELATED PAPERS

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Reabilitacijos mokslai: slauga, kineziterapija, ergoterapija

Evelina Lamsodienė

Yahia EL KHALKI

Phytopathogenic Mollicutes

HELENA GUGLIELMI MONTANO

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Duy-Huy NGUYEN

Cultures&Conflits

Vera Telles

Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abuzer Coşkun

Ramiro Ortiz

2006 European Microwave Conference

Zoya Popovic

Ernesto Gambao

Chemosphere

jean bosco tchatchueng

Annals of hepatology

Mohamed el sherbini

Lontar Komputer : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi

Made Kumara

bhavik shah

EPJ Web of Conferences

Athina Argyrouli

African Journal of Agricultural Research

Matheus Borba

International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education

Alfinio Flores

Marmara Üniversitesi

Ömer Ulaş Karakoç

BERKALA SAINSTEK

Mohamat Fatekurohman

Logic and Logical Philosophy

Matej Drobňák

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Intan nur Khatima.A

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Lourdes Martín

Nicci MacLeod

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

DistillerSR Logo

Smarter Reviews: Trusted Evidence

The global leader in AI-enabled literature review automation and enterprise evidence management software.

Explore by Industry

Scalable & secure.

Supports more than 675,000 references per project

Reduces literature review times by 35%-50%

Transparent & Reproducible

Tracks 100% of your review producing defensible results

“The first big project I took on with DistillerSR was for the Florida Department of Citrus. The review started with more than 60,000 references and DistillerSR handled it just fine!”

Jeanette Andrade Assistant Professor and Program Director, University of Florida

Medical Devices

Audit ready.

Tracks 100% of your literature review

35%-50% reduction in review times

Always Up-To-Date

Automatically import references to ensure complete submissions

“Every single time we’ve rolled out DistillerSR to a new group no one has said, let’s go back to managing references manually using Excel spreadsheets.”

Michael Klopfer Clinical Development Scientist – Philips

Pharmaceutical Companies

Reduce review creation times by up to 50%

Sail through audits and regulatory reviews

One Platform

100% configurable workflows while allowing for a unified platform

“DistillerSR made our process faster, it made us more confident in our accuracy, and it made our quality control simpler. There would be a mutiny on our team if we decided to use something else.”

Kimberly Ruiz Associate Director – Xcenda

Public Sector, NFPs & NGOs

Accelerated research.

Reduces literature review times and effort by 35%-50%

Built for Collaboration

Simplified project and participant oversight and support for teams

Configurable

Supports any research protocol, any workflow and any team configuration

“With DistillerSR, we are able to produce high-quality, accurate work in a much more timely fashion. We really liked what we saw in the demo, and we were able to get up and running right away with access to live support anytime we need it.”

Caroline Patton – The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)

Global research organizations, including 70% of the top 10 pharmaceutical and medical device companies, trust DistillerSR software to produce transparent, audit-ready, and regulatory-compliant literature reviews.

American College of Rheumatology Logo

The DistillerSR platform automates the conduct and management of literature reviews so you can deliver better research faster, more accurately and cost-effectively. DistillerSR’s highly configurable, AI-enabled workflow streamlines the entire literature review lifecycle, allowing you to make more informed evidence-based health policy decisions, clinical practice guidelines, and regulatory submissions.

Why Organizations Choose DistillerSR

Clock Icon

Accelerated Research Delivery

Reduces overall literature review times by 35%-50% by automating every stage of the process saving critical times and resources.

Icon of an AI Brain

Proven AI Capabilities

Used by the most prominent public and private sector research teams, DistillerSR AI seamlessly integrates into all aspects of the literature review workflow.

Gears

Supports multiple workflows, protocols, and teams across all industries with 100% configurable workflows that work the way you do.

Icon of clipboard with checkmarks

Audit-Ready

Tracks 100% of every search, every reference, every change, and every cell of data to ensure your review is audit-ready.

Icon of graphs scaling up

Scalable & Secure

Enterprise-Grade, DistillerSR

Enterprise-Grade

Certified SOC-2 and GDPR-compliant with a 99.9995% uptime.

Customer Satisfaction

Exceptional customer satisfaction with a 92% CSAT rating and a 99% annual subscription renewal rate.

Group of people collaborating and looking at a laptop screen

Customer Story: Philips

Faster, more accurate literature reviews.

Philips was looking for a transparent, standardized platform for more efficient literature reviews and CER submissions. Implementing DistillerSR resulted in over 70% faster literature review screening while improving speed and accuracy for CER submissions.

An alligator on the water's surface

Customer Story: University of Florida

More literature reviews under tight timelines.

Motion blur speed image

Customer Story: NCCMT

Consistently faster evidence.

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) team needed a better solution to manage their growing workload. Implementing DistillerSR resulted in a 75% reduction in screening which allowed them to move relevant references on to critical appraisal and ultimately getting research out to decision makers faster.

Cheetah Running

Customer Story: Geistlich Pharma

Literature review screening 85% faster than manual methods.

DistillerSR enabled faster reference screening, reducing title and abstract screening time by 85% from nearly four minutes to 35 seconds per reference in Geistlich Pharma’s first project.

Desk of Papers and Laptop

Customer Story: Medlior

Reducing errors for trusted evidence.

When dealing with large volumes of review, DistillerSR’s filtering improved Medlior CRO’s ability to cross-check citations early in the screening process. This mitigated the risk of missing citations and ultimately provided better research.

Learn More About DistillerSR

Invested in your success.

We take a holistic approach to making you successful. From configuring your first project, to consulting on a complex research set up, or training your team and answering support questions, we are here to ensure you are successful from day one.

Group of people collaborating and looking at a laptop screen

Featured Content

Pulse of the Medical Devices, Market Survey, DistillerSR

Findings indicate that organizations who invest in literature review software are more confident in their regulatory submissions.

Maple Health Case Study, DistillerSR

Maple Health Group

HTA - Business Brief, DistillerSR

Business Brief

Streamline health technology assessments by automating literature reviews.

Improve Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Budget Impact Modeling Using Literature Review Automation Software Cover Image

Buyer’s Guide

Everything you need to know to evaluate systematic review software for your next project. Evaluate all your options using our handy checklist.  

3D Envelope

Stay in Touch

Get our newsletter filled with news, resources and tips about literature reviews.  

Trust: Security, Compliance, and Privacy

Person sitting on chair using laptop

MIT Technology Review

  • Newsletters

Taking AI to the next level in manufacturing

Reducing data, talent, and organizational barriers to achieve scale.

  • MIT Technology Review Insights archive page

In partnership with Microsoft

Few technological advances have generated as much excitement as AI. In particular, generative AI seems to have taken business discourse to a fever pitch. Many manufacturing leaders express optimism: Research conducted by MIT Technology Review Insights found ambitions for AI development to be stronger in manufacturing than in most other sectors.

image of the report cover

Manufacturers rightly view AI as integral to the creation of the hyper-automated intelligent factory. They see AI’s utility in enhancing product and process innovation, reducing cycle time, wringing ever more efficiency from operations and assets, improving maintenance, and strengthening security, while reducing carbon emissions. Some manufacturers that have invested to develop AI capabilities are still striving to achieve their objectives.

This study from MIT Technology Review Insights seeks to understand how manufacturers are generating benefits from AI use cases—particularly in engineering and design and in factory operations. The survey included 300 manufacturers that have begun working with AI. Most of these (64%) are currently researching or experimenting with AI. Some 35% have begun to put AI use cases into production. Many executives that responded to the survey indicate they intend to boost AI spending significantly during the next two years. Those who haven’t started AI in production are moving gradually. To facilitate use-case development and scaling, these manufacturers must address challenges with talents, skills, and data. Following are the study’s key findings:

  • Talent, skills, and data are the main constraints on AI scaling. In both engineering and design and factory operations, manufacturers cite a deficit of talent and skills as their toughest challenge in scaling AI use cases. The closer use cases get to production, the harder this deficit bites. Many respondents say inadequate data quality and governance also hamper use-case development. Insufficient access to cloud-based compute power is another oft-cited constraint in engineering and design.
  • The biggest players do the most spending, and have the highest expectations. In engineering and design, 58% of executives expect their organizations to increase AI spending by more than 10% during the next two years. And 43% say the same when it comes to factory operations. The largest manufacturers are far more likely to make big increases in investment than those in smaller—but still large—size categories.
  • Desired AI gains are specific to manufacturing functions. The most common use cases deployed by manufacturers involve product design, conversational AI, and content creation. Knowledge management and quality control are those most frequently cited at pilot stage. In engineering and design, manufacturers chiefly seek AI gains in speed, efficiency, reduced failures, and security. In the factory, desired above all is better innovation, along with improved safety and a reduced carbon footprint.
  • Scaling can stall without the right data foundations. Respondents are clear that AI use-case development is hampered by inadequate data quality (57%), weak data integration (54%), and weak governance (47%). Only about one in five manufacturers surveyed have production assets with data ready for use in existing AI models. That figure dwindles as manufacturers put use cases into production. The bigger the manufacturer, the greater the problem of unsuitable data is.
  • Fragmentation must be addressed for AI to scale. Most manufacturers find some modernization of data architecture, infrastructure, and processes is needed to support AI, along with other technology and business priorities. A modernization strategy that improves interoperability of data systems between engineering and design and the factory, and between operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT), is a sound priority.

Artificial intelligence

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. but nobody knows exactly why..

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

  • Will Douglas Heaven archive page

Google DeepMind’s new generative model makes Super Mario–like games from scratch

Genie learns how to control games by watching hours and hours of video. It could help train next-gen robots too.

What’s next for generative video

OpenAI's Sora has raised the bar for AI moviemaking. Here are four things to bear in mind as we wrap our heads around what's coming.

The AI Act is done. Here’s what will (and won’t) change

The hard work starts now.

  • Melissa Heikkilä archive page

Stay connected

Get the latest updates from mit technology review.

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at [email protected] with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.

  • Auto Insurance Best Car Insurance Cheapest Car Insurance Compare Car Insurance Quotes Best Car Insurance For Young Drivers Best Auto & Home Bundles Cheapest Cars To Insure
  • Home Insurance Best Home Insurance Best Renters Insurance Cheapest Homeowners Insurance Types Of Homeowners Insurance
  • Life Insurance Best Life Insurance Best Term Life Insurance Best Senior Life Insurance Best Whole Life Insurance Best No Exam Life Insurance
  • Pet Insurance Best Pet Insurance Cheap Pet Insurance Pet Insurance Costs Compare Pet Insurance Quotes
  • Travel Insurance Best Travel Insurance Cancel For Any Reason Travel Insurance Best Cruise Travel Insurance Best Senior Travel Insurance
  • Health Insurance Best Health Insurance Plans Best Affordable Health Insurance Best Dental Insurance Best Vision Insurance Best Disability Insurance
  • Credit Cards Best Credit Cards 2024 Best Balance Transfer Credit Cards Best Rewards Credit Cards Best Cash Back Credit Cards Best Travel Rewards Credit Cards Best 0% APR Credit Cards Best Business Credit Cards Best Credit Cards for Startups Best Credit Cards For Bad Credit Best Cards for Students without Credit
  • Credit Card Reviews Chase Sapphire Preferred Wells Fargo Active Cash® Chase Sapphire Reserve Citi Double Cash Citi Diamond Preferred Chase Ink Business Unlimited American Express Blue Business Plus
  • Credit Card by Issuer Best Chase Credit Cards Best American Express Credit Cards Best Bank of America Credit Cards Best Visa Credit Cards
  • Credit Score Best Credit Monitoring Services Best Identity Theft Protection
  • CDs Best CD Rates Best No Penalty CDs Best Jumbo CD Rates Best 3 Month CD Rates Best 6 Month CD Rates Best 9 Month CD Rates Best 1 Year CD Rates Best 2 Year CD Rates Best 5 Year CD Rates
  • Checking Best High-Yield Checking Accounts Best Checking Accounts Best No Fee Checking Accounts Best Teen Checking Accounts Best Student Checking Accounts Best Joint Checking Accounts Best Business Checking Accounts Best Free Checking Accounts
  • Savings Best High-Yield Savings Accounts Best Free No-Fee Savings Accounts Simple Savings Calculator Monthly Budget Calculator: 50/30/20
  • Mortgages Best Mortgage Lenders Best Online Mortgage Lenders Current Mortgage Rates Best HELOC Rates Best Mortgage Refinance Lenders Best Home Equity Loan Lenders Best VA Mortgage Lenders Mortgage Refinance Rates Mortgage Interest Rate Forecast
  • Personal Loans Best Personal Loans Best Debt Consolidation Loans Best Emergency Loans Best Home Improvement Loans Best Bad Credit Loans Best Installment Loans For Bad Credit Best Personal Loans For Fair Credit Best Low Interest Personal Loans
  • Student Loans Best Student Loans Best Student Loan Refinance Best Student Loans for Bad or No Credit Best Low-Interest Student Loans
  • Business Loans Best Business Loans Best Business Lines of Credit Apply For A Business Loan Business Loan vs. Business Line Of Credit What Is An SBA Loan?
  • Investing Best Online Brokers Top 10 Cryptocurrencies Best Low-Risk Investments Best Cheap Stocks To Buy Now Best S&P 500 Index Funds Best Stocks For Beginners How To Make Money From Investing In Stocks
  • Retirement Best Gold IRAs Best Investments for a Roth IRA Best Bitcoin IRAs Protecting Your 401(k) In a Recession Types of IRAs Roth vs Traditional IRA How To Open A Roth IRA
  • Business Formation Best LLC Services Best Registered Agent Services How To Start An LLC How To Start A Business
  • Web Design & Hosting Best Website Builders Best E-commerce Platforms Best Domain Registrar
  • HR & Payroll Best Payroll Software Best HR Software Best HRIS Systems Best Recruiting Software Best Applicant Tracking Systems
  • Payment Processing Best Credit Card Processing Companies Best POS Systems Best Merchant Services Best Credit Card Readers How To Accept Credit Cards
  • More Business Solutions Best VPNs Best VoIP Services Best Project Management Software Best CRM Software Best Accounting Software
  • Manage Topics
  • Investigations
  • Visual Explainers
  • Newsletters
  • Abortion news
  • Coronavirus
  • Climate Change
  • Vertical Storytelling
  • Corrections Policy
  • College Football
  • High School Sports
  • H.S. Sports Awards
  • Sports Betting
  • College Basketball (M)
  • College Basketball (W)
  • For The Win
  • Sports Pulse
  • Weekly Pulse
  • Buy Tickets
  • Sports Seriously
  • Sports+ States
  • Celebrities
  • Entertainment This!
  • Celebrity Deaths
  • American Influencer Awards
  • Women of the Century
  • Problem Solved
  • Personal Finance
  • Small Business
  • Consumer Recalls
  • Video Games
  • Product Reviews
  • Destinations
  • Airline News
  • Experience America
  • Today's Debate
  • Suzette Hackney
  • Policing the USA
  • Meet the Editorial Board
  • How to Submit Content
  • Hidden Common Ground
  • Race in America

Personal Loans

Best Personal Loans

Auto Insurance

Best Auto Insurance

Best High-Yields Savings Accounts

CREDIT CARDS

Best Credit Cards

Advertiser Disclosure

Blueprint is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service focused on helping readers make smarter decisions. We receive compensation from the companies that advertise on Blueprint which may impact how and where products appear on this site. The compensation we receive from advertisers does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides in our articles or otherwise impact any of the editorial content on Blueprint. Blueprint does not include all companies, products or offers that may be available to you within the market. A list of selected affiliate partners is available here .

HR software pricing: 2024 industry overview

Teresa Bitler

Sierra Campbell

Sierra Campbell

“Verified by an expert” means that this article has been thoroughly reviewed and evaluated for accuracy.

Published 7:22 a.m. UTC April 15, 2024

  • path]:fill-[#49619B]" alt="Facebook" width="18" height="18" viewBox="0 0 18 18" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
  • path]:fill-[#202020]" alt="Email" width="19" height="14" viewBox="0 0 19 14" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">

Editorial Note: Blueprint may earn a commission from affiliate partner links featured here on our site. This commission does not influence our editors' opinions or evaluations. Please view our full advertiser disclosure policy .

Featured Image

kate_sept2004, Getty Images

Human resources (HR) software helps businesses manage employees and their data, assisting with tasks such as hiring, onboarding, time tracking, performance reviews and more. Most can also integrate with other software, including project management platforms.

While there are free HR software solutions on the market, you can expect to pay anywhere from $4 to more than $1,000 per month for a subscription-based platform. Generally, the more you pay, the more features and functionality you get. 

In this guide, we compare the HR software pricing of some of the most popular HR management systems, so you can decide which one is best for your business.

Featured payroll software offers

literature review on software industry

Via OnPay’s website

Monthly fee

$40 per month plus $6 per employee

Direct deposit

literature review on software industry

Via Rippling’s website

$35 per month + $8 per user

literature review on software industry

Via Gusto’s Website

Starting at $40 plus $6 per month per employee

SurePayroll

literature review on software industry

Via SurePayroll’s website

$29.99 per month plus $5 per employee

HR software pricing factors

Several factors influence the cost of HR software, including the number of employees and features. Prioritizing what’s important can help reduce costs, but some factors will be out of your control.

Here’s what to consider when deciding which HR management system is right for your business.

  • Company size. The more users that need access to the software, the more you’ll pay. Similarly, HR providers usually charge more based on the number of employees that need to be tracked. However, some providers do offer a discount to large companies with high-volume payroll needs.
  • Features and functionality. Costs increase for more features and advanced features like AI-generated projections. On the other hand, some providers offer free versions of their software that have minimal features.
  • Customization. You’ll pay extra for a custom solution that takes the provider time to develop. Then, you’ll need to budget extra funds for the provider to review the customization and ensure it will be compatible with any updates to the software.
  • Integration and implementation. Anything more than installing the HR software will cost extra, including moving data from an old system to the new one (data migration) and making the new software work with existing software (integration), such as project management software . Onsite training of your staff on how to use the software generally costs more, too.
  • Customer support. Generally, free versions offer little or no customer support, while higher-priced software solutions provide access to live chat or phone support. Other help, like training, usually comes at an additional charge.
  • Pricing model. You can pay for HR software on a subscription basis or purchase it outright. The subscription model can be more expensive as your company grows, but with purchased software, you will need to fork over for updates.
  • Payment type. Providers give discounts to businesses willing to pay annually for their software subscription instead of on a monthly basis. Additionally, you’ll generally pay less if you sign a multi-year contract.

How are HR software pricing plans structured?

There are two main HR software pricing plans: subscription and perpetual license. The best option for your business will depend on your budget, the size of your company, security concerns and how much support you need. 

Subscription

The most common HR software pricing plan is subscription. Under this pricing structure, businesses pay a monthly or annual fee — based on the number of users, features, and level of support — to access the software on the cloud. 

Most subscription plans also offer tiered packages, starting with a low-cost, basic version of the platform. At each additional level, the number of features and services increases along with the price.

Some software providers have a free version, too. While potentially good for very small companies, these “freemium” options have limited HR tools and are designed to provide just enough functionality to entice you to upgrade to a paid version. Even if you can get by on the free version’s features, you will likely need to upgrade to get more seats and accommodate more employees as your company grows.

Because subscription plans are cloud-based, they are a good option for businesses that don’t want to host or manage their own data. Another advantage of cloud-based subscription plans is that they automatically update when a new version is available.

Perpetual license

With perpetual licensing, businesses pay for the software upfront and host it on their own servers. The HR software pricing plan may come in the form of a one-time fee or an annual subscription that includes maintenance and support fees. Depending on the provider, you may have the option to purchase add-ons or customize the software to meet your needs for an additional charge.

Perpetual licensing is usually best for large companies concerned about data security. Since the information is hosted on their internal servers, large companies can control the measures taken to keep data safe. 

However, because the software provider doesn’t know the company’s servers or IT setup, it can only give minimal tech support. The company also will need to install updates and perform the maintenance a provider normally would for a subscription platform. 

How much does HR software cost?

You can find no-cost “freemium” HR software with basic features, but these often limit the number of platform users and the number of employees you can service. For a comprehensive solution, expect to pay anywhere from a few dollars per month to more than $1,000 per month. 

The wide range in HR software pricing depends on the features and functionality, size of your company, customization and other factors noted above. Most HR software platforms also give a discount if you pay annually instead of per month.

Top HR software pricing examples

Is hr software worth it.

HR software can be expensive, but it’s worth the cost for most businesses for these main reasons.

  • Automation. HR software can automate tasks like payroll, reducing the need for manual entry. Additionally, because more tasks are automated, you may not need to hire as many staff.
  • Compliance. Cloud-based platforms update to reflect changes in payroll tax rates, overtime rules and other employment laws. This can reduce the risk of your staff making costly mistakes based on prior rules.
  • Integration. Some HR software can sync with your workforce platform, allowing you to share information across departments. For example, your workforce platform can share timekeeping information, which may be necessary for payroll or performance reviews.
  • Improved hiring and onboarding. With applicant tracking features, HR can monitor an applicant’s progress through the hiring process. After they are hired, HR can use software checklists and e-signature tools to streamline onboarding.
  • Analytics. Most HR platforms can capture data and display it in easy-to-understand reports. Some also provide visual graphs and charts. 

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

The best HR software depends on your company’s needs and budget. Based on our assessment of 25 HR platforms across nearly 40 categories, Monday.com comes out on top because it is easy to use and integrates with more than 200 third-party applications. 

However, that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best software for your company. To determine the best HR platform for your company, you should at the least consider price, features, support and the ability to customize.

Of the HR software providers that list their pricing, 15Five offers a solution for $4 per month, though other options are not far behind. GoCo costs $5 per month while Eddy is $6 per month and ClickUp charges $7 per month for its first paid tier, though it also offers a free plan option.

Some companies offer a “freemium” version of their HR software with basic features. Often, these free versions limit the number of employees that can be on the payroll or the number of people who can use the software, so as your company grows, you may need to upgrade to a paid plan. 

Additionally, you may have to pay for some features or upgrade for some features. For example, the free version of Monday.com doesn’t offer time and attendance tracking.

The cost of outsourcing your payroll needs to a third party can range from free to $125 (plus $10 per employee) per month for QuickBooks Payroll’s elite plan. On average, the cost is $30 to $80 per month if you choose a paid option. However, many free and low-cost providers have limits.

For example, Payroll4Free is free for only your first 10 employees. After that, you will pay for additional increments of employees.

There are three main types of all-in-one HR software solutions: human resources information systems (HRIS) , human resources management systems (HRMS) and human capital management (HCM) software. Within these, there are several sub-categories, including:

  • Recruitment software.
  • Onboarding software.
  • Time and attendance software.
  • Payroll services.
  • Performance management software.
  • Employee scheduling software.
  • Workforce planning tools.

Blueprint is an independent publisher and comparison service, not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and we encourage you to seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding specific financial decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Blueprint has an advertiser disclosure policy . The opinions, analyses, reviews or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the Blueprint editorial staff alone. Blueprint adheres to strict editorial integrity standards. The information is accurate as of the publish date, but always check the provider’s website for the most current information.

Teresa Bitler

Teresa Bitler has over 10 years of experience writing about personal finance and real estate as well as consumer and business product reviews. Her work has appeared at CreditCards, The Penny Hoarder, Yahoo, MSN, HuffPost, U.S. News & World Report, Moving, and Personal Real Estate Investor.

Sierra Campbell is a small business editor for USA Today Blueprint. She specializes in writing, editing and fact-checking content centered around helping businesses. She has worked as a digital content and show producer for several local TV stations, an editor for U.S. News & World Report and a freelance writer and editor for many companies. Sierra prides herself in delivering accurate and up-to-date information to readers. Her expertise includes credit card processing companies, e-commerce platforms, payroll software, accounting software and virtual private networks (VPNs). She also owns Editing by Sierra, where she offers editing services to writers of all backgrounds, including self-published and traditionally published authors.

How to start a small business: A step-by-step guide

How to start a small business: A step-by-step guide

Business Eric Rosenberg

Advertisement

Advertisement

Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies

  • Published: 24 July 2018
  • Volume 31 , pages 127–182, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

  • Ercan Oztemel 1 &
  • Samet Gursev 1  

59k Accesses

1072 Citations

Explore all metrics

Manufacturing industry profoundly impact economic and societal progress. As being a commonly accepted term for research centers and universities, the Industry 4.0 initiative has received a splendid attention of the business and research community. Although the idea is not new and was on the agenda of academic research in many years with different perceptions, the term “Industry 4.0” is just launched and well accepted to some extend not only in academic life but also in the industrial society as well. While academic research focuses on understanding and defining the concept and trying to develop related systems, business models and respective methodologies, industry, on the other hand, focuses its attention on the change of industrial machine suits and intelligent products as well as potential customers on this progress. It is therefore important for the companies to primarily understand the features and content of the Industry 4.0 for potential transformation from machine dominant manufacturing to digital manufacturing. In order to achieve a successful transformation, they should clearly review their positions and respective potentials against basic requirements set forward for Industry 4.0 standard. This will allow them to generate a well-defined road map. There has been several approaches and discussions going on along this line, a several road maps are already proposed. Some of those are reviewed in this paper. However, the literature clearly indicates the lack of respective assessment methodologies. Since the implementation and applications of related theorems and definitions outlined for the 4th industrial revolution is not mature enough for most of the reel life implementations, a systematic approach for making respective assessments and evaluations seems to be urgently required for those who are intending to speed this transformation up. It is now main responsibility of the research community to developed technological infrastructure with physical systems, management models, business models as well as some well-defined Industry 4.0 scenarios in order to make the life for the practitioners easy. It is estimated by the experts that the Industry 4.0 and related progress along this line will have an enormous effect on social life. As outlined in the introduction, some social transformation is also expected. It is assumed that the robots will be more dominant in manufacturing, implanted technologies, cooperating and coordinating machines, self-decision-making systems, autonom problem solvers, learning machines, 3D printing etc. will dominate the production process. Wearable internet, big data analysis, sensor based life, smart city implementations or similar applications will be the main concern of the community. This social transformation will naturally trigger the manufacturing society to improve their manufacturing suits to cope with the customer requirements and sustain competitive advantage. A summary of the potential progress along this line is reviewed in introduction of the paper. It is so obvious that the future manufacturing systems will have a different vision composed of products, intelligence, communications and information network. This will bring about new business models to be dominant in industrial life. Another important issue to take into account is that the time span of this so-called revolution will be so short triggering a continues transformation process to yield some new industrial areas to emerge. This clearly puts a big pressure on manufacturers to learn, understand, design and implement the transformation process. Since the main motivation for finding the best way to follow this transformation, a comprehensive literature review will generate a remarkable support. This paper presents such a review for highlighting the progress and aims to help improve the awareness on the best experiences. It is intended to provide a clear idea for those wishing to generate a road map for digitizing the respective manufacturing suits. By presenting this review it is also intended to provide a hands-on library of Industry 4.0 to both academics as well as industrial practitioners. The top 100 headings, abstracts and key words (i.e. a total of 619 publications of any kind) for each search term were independently analyzed in order to ensure the reliability of the review process. Note that, this exhaustive literature review provides a concrete definition of Industry 4.0 and defines its six design principles such as interoperability, virtualization, local, real-time talent, service orientation and modularity. It seems that these principles have taken the attention of the scientists to carry out more variety of research on the subject and to develop implementable and appropriate scenarios. A comprehensive taxonomy of Industry 4.0 can also be developed through analyzing the results of this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from BCMCOM ( 2017 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Oztemel ( 2010 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Oztemel and Tekez ( 2009a )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Boston Consulting Group ( 2016 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Lichtblau et al. ( 2016 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from GTAI ( 2017 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Remon ( 2017 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Jaehne and KalalChelvan ( 2017 )

literature review on software industry

Reproduced with permission from Gaurav ( 2017 )

Similar content being viewed by others

literature review on software industry

A comprehensive literature review of the applications of AI techniques through the lifecycle of industrial equipment

Mahboob Elahi, Samuel Olaiya Afolaranmi, … Jose Antonio Perez Garcia

literature review on software industry

Artificial intelligence, cyber-threats and Industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities

Adrien Bécue, Isabel Praça & João Gama

literature review on software industry

Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data

Fei Tao, Jiangfeng Cheng, … Fangyuan Sui

Aalaei, A., & Davoudpour, H. (2016). Revised multi-choice goal programming for incorporated dynamic virtual cellular manufacturing into supply chain management: A case study. Engineering Applications of Artifical Intelligence, 47, 3–15.

Google Scholar  

Abdoa, J., & Demerjianb, J. (2017). Evaluation of mobile cloud architectures. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 39, 284–303.

Aburaia, M., Markl, E., & Stuje, K. (2015). New concept for design and control of 4 axis robot using the additive manufacturing technology. Procedia Engineering, 100, 1364–1369.

Accenture. (2016). Industry 4.0 revolution report . https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-digital-industry-impact . Available on August 28, 2017.

Accorsi, R., Bortolini, M., Baruffaldi, G., Pilati, F., & Ferrari, E. (2017). Internet-of-things paradigm in food supply chains control and management. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 889–895.

Ackermann, R. (2013). M2M , internet of things and industry 4.0 — An industry perspective . http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Second_German-Indian-Workshop/India_01_13_Industrie40_m2m_Ackermann_SAP.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Addo-Tenkorang, R., & Helo, P. T. (2016). Big data applications in operations/supply-chain management: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 528–543.

Adeyeri, S., Kanisuru, M., Khumbulani, M., & Olukorede T. (2015). Integration of agent technology into manufacturing enterprise: A review and platform for industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE) (pp. 1625–1635).

Agency, M. (2008). The medical products agency’s working group on medical information systems . National Board of Health and Welfare in the regulations on quality management systems in health care. https://lakemedelsverket.se/upload/foretag/medicinteknik/en/Medical-Information-Systems-Report_2009-06-18.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

Ahmed, E., & Kohno, R. (2017). Error control coding and decoding with medical QoS constraints for Wban end to end connection via UMTS channel. ICT Express . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2018.01.016 .

Article   Google Scholar  

AIR-LIQUIDE. (2016). https://www.airliquide.com/media/france-air-liquide-plant-future-project-certified-technological-showcase-industry-future-alliance . Available on August 30, 2017.

Akoka, J., Wattiau, I., & Laoufi, N. (2016). Research on big data—A systematic mapping study. Neurocomputing, 2, 1023–1041.

Al-Ali, A., & Aburukba, R. (2015). Role of internet of things in the smart grid technology. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, 229–233.

Alam, K., & Saddik, A. (2015). C2PS: A digital twin architecture reference model for the cloud-based cyber-physical system. IEEE Access, 5, 25–35.

Alanso-Martin, F., Castro, A., Malfaz, M., & Castillo, J. (2017). Identification and distance estimation of users and objects by means of electronic beacons in social robotics. Expert Systems with Applications, 86, 247–257.

Alatoibi, Y. (2016). Business process modelling challenges and solutions: A literature review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 701–723.

Alayaa, M., Banouara, D., Monteila, S., Chassota, Z., & Drira, T. (2014). OM2M: Extensible ETSI-compliant M2M service platform with self-configuration capability. Computer Science, 32, 1079–1086.

Albert, A., Bartosz, G., Tobias, P., Viktoriia, B., & Tobias, S. (2016). Procedure for defining the system of objectives in the initial phase of an industry 4.0 project focusing on intelligent quality control systems. Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, 52, 262–267.

Albodour, R., James, A., & Yaacob, N. (2015). QoS within business grid quality of service (BGQoS). Future Generation Computer Systems, 50, 22–37.

Aleina, S. C., Viola, N., Fusara, R., Saccoccia, G., & Vercella, V. (2018). Using the ESA exploration technology roadmaps in support of new mission concepts and technology prioritization. Acta Astronautica . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.035 .

Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 17 (4), 2347–2376.

Alharthi, A., Krotov, V., & Bowman, M. (2017). Adressing bariers to big data. Business Horizons, 60, 285–292.

Alkhamisi, A., & Monowar, M. (2013). Rise of augmented reality: Current and future application areas. International Journal of Internet and Distributed Systems, 1, 25–34.

Alkoc, E., & Erbatur, F. (1997). Productivity improvement in concreting operations through simulation models. Building Research and Information, 25 (2), 83–95.

Amatoa, F., & Moscato, F. (2017). Exploiting cloud and workflow patterns for the analysis of composite cloud services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 67, 255–265.

Anderl, R. (2014). Industries 4.0-advanced engineering of smart products and smart production. In 19th International seminar on high technology, technological innovations in the product development, Piracicaba, Brazil . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270392830_Industrie_40_-_Advanced_Engineering_of_Smart_Products_and_Smart_Production_09_October_2014 . Available on December 28, 2017.

Andrade, A., Pereira, A., Walter, S., Almeida, R., Loureiro, R., Compagna, D., et al. (2014). Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 10, 65–78.

Angeles, R. (2005). RFID technologies: Supply-chain applications and implementation issues. Information Systems Management, 22, 51–65.

Ângelo, A., Barata, J., da Cunha, P. R., & Almeida, V. (2017). Digital transformation in the pharmaceutical compounds supply chain: Design of a service ecosystem with e-labeling. In European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern conference on information systems (pp. 307–323).

Anitha, R., & Mukherjee, S. (2017). ‘MaaS’: Fast retrieval of E-file in cloud using metadata as a service. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1871–1891.

ARIZ. (2017). https://www.festo.com/group/en/cms/12690.htm . Available on August 30, 2017.

Armentia, A., Gangoiti, U., Orive, D., & Marcos, M. (2017). Dynamic QoS management for flexible multimedia applications. IFAC PapersOnLine, 50, 5920–5925.

Atanasov, I., Nikolov, A., Pencheva, E., Dimova, R., & Ivanov, M. (2015). An approach to data annotation for internet of things. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), 10 (4), 1–19.

Atif, Y., Dinga, J., & Jeusfelda, M. A. (2016). Internet of things approach to cloud-based smart car parking. Computer Science, 98, 193–198.

Atzori, L., Morabito, G., & Lera, A. (2017). Understanding the internet of things: Definition. Ad Hoc Networks, 56, 122–140.

AWS. (2017). https://aws.amazon.com/iot-platform/ . Available on August 30, 2017.

Azevedo, P., Azevedo, C., & Romão, M. (2014). Application integration: Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in the hospitality industry. Procedia Technology, 16, 52–58.

Backhaus, J., & Reinhart, G. (2017). Digital description of products, processes and resources for task-oriented programming of assembly systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1787–1800.

Badawi, H., Dong, H., & El Saddika, Abdulmotaleb. (2017). Mobile cloud-based physical activity advisory system using biofeedback sensors. Future Generation Computer Systems, 66, 59–70.

Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H. A., & Lee, J. (2015). Cyber-physical systems architecture for selfaware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48 (3), 1622–1627.

Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. The İmpact of Control Technology, 12, 161–166.

Balina, S., Baumgarte, D., & Salna, E. (2017). Cloud based cross-system integration for small and medium-sized enterprises. Computer Science, 104, 127–132.

Bartezzaghi, E., & Ronchi, S. (2003). Internet supporting the procurement process lessons from four case studies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14, 632–641.

Bauer, W., Schlund, S., Marrenbach, D., & Ganschar, O. (2014). Industry 4.0 — Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland, BITKOM company . http://www.produktionsarbeit.de/content/dam/produktionsarbeit/de/documents/Studie-Industrie-4-0-Volkswirtschaftliches-Potential-fuer-Deutschland.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017 (in German) .

Bauernhansl, T. (2014). Die vierte Industrylle Revolution. Der Weg in ein wertschaffendes Produktionsparadigma, 4, 3–35. (in German) .

Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (Eds.) (2014). Industry 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. Anwendung, Technologien und Migration 8 , 30–40 (in German) .

Baygin, M., Yetis, H., Karakose, M., & Akin, E. (2016). An effect analysis of industry 4.0 to higher education. In 2016 15th international conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET ), July 10–12, 2017, Ohrid, Macedonia.

BCMCOM. (2017). Industry 4.0 technologies for new trends and developments for industry delivering quality . http://www.bcmcom.com/solutions_application_industry40.htm . Available on August 28, 2017.

Beckera, T., & Sterna, H. (2016). Future trends in human work area design for cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, 57, 404–409.

Bellini, P., Bruno, I., Cenni, D., & Nesi, P. (2017). Managing cloud via smart cloud engine and knowledge base. In 2015 IEEE 8th international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD) , 27 June–2 July 2015, New York, NY, USA.

Bello, O., Zeadally, S., & Badra, M. (2017). Network layer inter-operation of device-to-device communication technologies in internet of things (IoT). Ad Hoc Networks, 57, 52–62.

Bently, C. (2016). The manufacturer industry 4.0 UK readiness report . Oracle Company Report. https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/s/delivery_production/docs/FY16h1/doc19/Industry-Report.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Bergera, C., Heesa, A., Braunreuthera, S., & Reinharta, G. (2016). Characterization of cyber-physical sensor systems. Manufacturing System, 41, 638–643.

Berryman, D. (2012). Augmented reality: A review. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31 (2), 212–218.

Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., & Pantano, P. (2017). Shopping with a robotic companion. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 382–395.

Biral, A., Centenaro, M., Zanella, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2015). The challenges of M2M massive access in wireless cellular networks. Digital Communications and Networks, 1 (1), 1–19.

BMBF. (2014). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 2014: Zukunftsbild Industry 4.0 . http://www.bmbf.de/pubRD/Zukunftsbild_Industry_40.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017 (in German) .

Boston Consulting Group. (2016). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries . https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/engineered_products_project_business_industry_40_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries/?chapter=4#chapter4_section2 . Available on August 28, 2017.

Bourke, R., & Mentis, M. (2014). An assessment framework for inclusive education: Integrating assessment approaches. Assesment in Education, 21 (4), 384–397.

Bouwers, E., & Vis, R. (2009). Multidimensional software monitoring applied to ERP. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 233, 161–173.

Boveta, G., & Hennebertb, J. (2013). Energy-efficient optimization layer for event-based communications on Wi-Fi thing. Computer Science, 19, 256–264.

Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented reality in education—Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51 (1), 1–15.

Brandmeier, M., Bognera, E., Brossoga, M., & Frankea, J. (2016). Product design improvement through knowledge feedback of cyber-physical systems. Procedia CIRP, 50, 186–191.

Brennera, A., & Hummela, V. (2016). A seamless convergence of the digital and physical factory aiming in personalized Product Emergence Process (PPEP) for smart products within ESB Logistics Learning Factory at Reutlingen University. Procedia CIRP, 54, 227–232.

Brettel, M., Klein, M., & Friederichsen, N. (2016). The relevance of manufacturing flexibility int he context of industries 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 41, 105–110.

Brioto, M., Hoque Z., Steinke R., & Willner A. (2016). Towards programmable fog nodes in smart factories. In 2016 IEEE 1st international workshops on foundations and applications of self systems, Augsburg, Germany , 12–16 September 2016.

Brunete, A., Gambao, E., Koskinen, J., Heikkila, T., Kaldestad, K., Tyapin, I., et al. (2017). Hard material small-batch industrial machining robot. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.11.004 .

Bryner, M. (2012). Smart manufacturing: The next revolution. CEP Magazine, 7, 1090–1098.

Bui, D., Yoon, Y., Huh, E., Jun, S., & Lee, S. (2013). Energy efficiency for cloud computing system based on predictive optimization. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 102, 103–114.

Bungart, S. (2014). Industrial internet versus industry 4.0 . Produktion—Technik und Wirtschaft für die deutsche Industry. Retrieved from http://www.produktion.de/automatisierung/industrial-internet-versus-Industry-4-0/print . Available on August 28, 2017.

Bunse, B. (2016). Industry: Based on “German Industry 4.0” report. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 18, 40–50.

Bürger, T., & Tragl, K. (2014). SPS - Automatisierung mit den Technologien der IT - Welt verbinden . Technologien und Migration (pp. 559–569) (in German) .

Burke, M., Quigley, N., & Speed, C. (2013). The internet of things: Pink jumpers and Hungarian eggs in digital spaces. Procedia Computer Engineering, 9, 152–157.

Calderona, M., Delgadilloa, S., & Antonio, J. (2016). A more human-centric Internet of Things with temporal and spatial context. Computer Science, 83 (2016), 553–559.

Candra, S. (2012). ERP implementation success and knowledge capability. International Congress on Interdisciplinary Business and Social Science, 65, 141–149.

Canedoa, A., & Richterb, J. (2014). Architectural design space exploration of cyber-physical systems using the functional modeling compiler. Engineering Services, 21, 46–51.

Carboneras, M., Insa, C., & Salort, E. (2003). ERP implementation in the stone industry: Special difficulties and solutions in the production area. In Emerging technologies and factory automation, 2003. Proceedings. ETFA’03. IEEE conference . Lisbon, Portugal.

Carniani, E., Darenzo, D., Lazouski, A., Martinelli, A., & Mori, P. (2016). Usage control on cloud systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 63, 37–55.

Carrera, C., & Asensio, C. (2016). Landscape interpretation with augmented reality and maps to improve spatial orientation skill. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41 (1), 119–133.

Carstensen, J., Carstensen, T., Pabs, M., Schulz, F., Friederichs, J., Aden, S., et al. (2016). Condition monitoring and cloud-based energy analysis for autonomous mobile manipulation—Smart factory concept with LUHbots. Procedia Technology, 26 (2016), 560–569.

Chang, H., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2014). IT convergence security. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25, 213–215.

Chang, H., Ma, J., Loke, S., Zimmermann, H., & Li, Z. (2012). Intelligent ubiquitous IT policy and its industrial services. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 913–915.

Chang, V., Ramachandranb, M., Wills, G., Walters, R., Li, C., & Watters, P. (2016). Editorial for FGCS special issue: Big Data in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 65, 73–75.

Chatterjee, S. (2015). ERP failure in developing countries: A case study in India. In India conference (INDICON), 2015 Annual IEEE , 17–20 December 2015, New Delhi, India.

Chelloug, S. (2015). Energy-efficient content-based routing in internet of things. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, 9–20.

Chen, G., & Liu, Y. (2012). Performance evaluation of ERP implementation based on uncertainty measurement theory. In 2012 International conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, 20–21 October 2012, Sanya, China.

Chen, G., & Wang, J. (2010). Analysis on performance evaluation system of ERP implementation. In 2010 International conference of information science and management engineering , 7–8 August 2010, China.

Chen, T. C. (2018). Cloud intelligence in manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1057–1059.

Chen, T., & Chiu, M. (2017). Development of a cloud-based factory simulation system for enabling ubiquitous factory simulation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 45, 133–143.

Chen, T., & Wu, C. (2017). A new cloud computing method for establishing asymmetric cycle time intervals in a wafer fabrication factory. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1095–1107.

Chen, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, X., & Chen, L. (2018). Robot needle-punching for manufacturing composite preforms. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 50, 132–139.

Chen, X., & Jin, Z. (2012). Research on key technology and applications for internet of things. Physics Procedia, 33 (2012), 561–566.

Cheng, G., Lıu, L., & Quıang, Z. (2016). Industry 4.0 development and application of intelligent manufacturing. In 2016 International conference on information system and artificial intelligence , 24–26 June 2016, Hong Kong, China.

Cheng-Yu, W., Pi-Cheng, T., & Chyun-Chau, F. (2010). Development of an automatic arc welding system using an adaptive sliding mode control. Intelligent Manufacturing, 21 (4), 355–362.

Chi, X., Zhang, J., & Ma, L. (2011). Queuing theory based service performance evaluation under H2H and M2M blending traffic arriving. Procedia Environmental Science, 11 (Part A), 478–485.

Chien, C., Gen, M., & Shi, Y. (2014). Manufacturing intelligence and innovation for digital manufacturing and operational excellence. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25, 845–847.

Chlen, C., Kim, K., Liu, B., & Gen, M. (2012). Advanced decision and intelligence technologies for manufacturing and logistics. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 2133–2135.

Chu, C., Weidong, L., & Jiao, R. (2013). Design chain management: bridging the gap between engineering and management. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 541–544.

Cooper, S. (2017). Designing a UK industrial strategy for the age of industry 4.0. Rethink Manufacturing (pp. 1–27).

Corcio, M. (2016). Manufacturing intelligence, group manager: Automation, MES & Electricity . http://www.iiconsortium.org/smart-factory-forum/MIGUEL-CORCIO-Keynote_IIC-MC-Smart_Manufacturing.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Dagli, C. (2016). Engineering cyber physical systems: Applying theory to practice. Procedia Computer Science, 95, 7–8.

Daim, T., Yoon, B., Linderberg, J., Grizzi, R., & Estep, J. (2018). Strategic roadmapping of robotics echnologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 49–66.

Damle, A., Damle, R., Flahive, J., Schlussel, A. T., Davids, J., Sturrock, P. R., et al. (2017). Diffusion of technology: Trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. The American Journal of Surgery, 214, 820–824.

Dasgupta, A., Nagaraj, R., & Nagamani, K. (2016). An internet of things platform with Google. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 9, 291–295.

Davali, I., Belli, L., Cilfone, A., & Ferrari, G. (2016). Integration of Wifi mobile nodes in a web of things tested. ICT Express, 2 (3), 96–99.

Dechene, D., & Shami, A. (2013). Energy efficient QoS constrained scheduler for SC-FDMA uplink. Physical Communication, 8, 81–90.

Decker, M., Fischer, M., & Ott, I. (2017). Service robotics and human labor: A first technology assessment of substitution and cooperation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87, 348–354.

DEF. (2016). https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/PDF/web-dp-indus-ang.pdf . Available on August 30, 2017.

Deja, M., & Siemiaatkowski, M. (2013). Feature-based generation of machining process plans for optimised parts manufacture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 831–846.

Dener, M., & Bostancıoğlu, C. (2015). Smart technologies with wireless sensor networks. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1915–1921.

Deng, G., Chen, D., & Yao, M. (2015). Value structure analysis for cloud service ecosystem. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 21 (4/5/6), 228–237.

Ding, L., Liu, Y., Han, B., & Zhang, S. (2017a). HB-file: An efficient and effective high-dimensional big data storage structure based on US-ELM. Proceedings of ELM, 1, 489–500.

Ding, Y., Yaoa, G., & Haoa, K. (2017b). Fault-tolerant elastic scheduling algorithm for workflow in cloud systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 393, 47–65.

Do, H., Minh, P., Sheng, W., Yang, D., & Liu, M. (2018). RiSH: A robot-integrated smart home for elderly care. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 101, 74–92.

Dong, H.-S. (2016). Anatomy of big data developmental process. Telecommunication Policy, 40 (9), 837–854.

Drath, H., & Horch, A. (2014). Industry 4.0: Hit or hype? Industry forum. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 8 (2), 56–58.

Du, C., Tan, L., & Dong, Y. (2015). Period selection for integrated controller tasks in cyber physical systems. Aeronautics China, 28 (3), 894–902.

Du, Z., He, L., Chen, Y., Xiao, Y., Gao, P., & Wang, T. (2017). Robot cloud: Bridging the power of robotics and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74, 337–348.

Duan, Q. (2017). Cloud service performance evaluation: status, challenges, and opportunities—A survey from the system modeling perspective. Computer Science, 3 (2), 101–111.

Dudek, J., Auersperg, J., Pantou, R., & Rzepka, S. (2015). Thermal and mechanical behavior of an RFID based smart system embedded in a transmission belt determined by FEM simulations for industry 4.0 applications. In 2015 16th international conference on Fraunhofer ENAS , 19–22 April 2015, Budapest, Hungary.

Dworschak, B., & Zaiser, H. (2014). Competencies for cyber-physical systems in manufacturing—First findings and scenarios. Procedia CIRP, 25, 345–350.

EEF. (2017). The 4th industrial revolution — A primer for manufacturers . Technical report, EEF the manufacturers Organization, UK.

e-factory. (2017). https://tr3a.mitsubishielectric.com/fa/tr/solutions/efactory . Available on August 30, 2017.

Elmangousha, A., Coricib, A., Steinkeb, R., Coricib, M., & Magedanz, T. (2015). A framework for handling heterogeneous M2M traffic. Procedia Computer Science, 63, 112–119.

Elmonem, M. A., Geith, M., Nasr, E., & Geith, M. (2017). Benefits and challenges of cloud ERP systems—A systematic literature review. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 1 (1–2), 1–9.

Elmonem, M., Nasr, E., & Geith, M. (2016). Benefits and challenges of cloud ERP systems: A systematic literature view. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 1 (1–2), 1–9.

Elragal, A. (2014). ERP and big data: The inept couple. Procedia Technology, 16, 242–249.

Enget, K. (2016). A big data case. Journal of Accounting Education, 39, 1–84.

ENTOC. (2017). https://www.festo.com/group/en/cms/12827.htm . Available on August 30, 2017.

EPRS. (2015). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/568337/EPRS_BRI(2015)568337_EN.pdf . Available on August 30, 2017.

Epstein, B., & Givoni, M. (2016). Analyzing the gap between the QOS demanded by PT users and QOS supplied by service operators. Transportation Research Part A, 94, 622–637.

Ermilova, E., & Afsarmanesh, E. (2007). Modeling and management of profiles and competencies in VBEs. Intelligent Manufacturing, 18, 561–586.

Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible industry 4.0: A scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13–18.

Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366.

ESIMA. (2017). Industry 4.0 project . https://www.esima-projekt.de/ . Available on August 28, 2017 (in Germany) .

Eslava, H., Rojas, L., & Pereira, R. (2014). Implementation of machine-to-machine solutions using MQTT protocol in internet of things (IoT) environment to improve automation process for electrical distribution substations in Colombia. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 3, 92–96.

Evans, A., & Annunziata, B. (2012). Industrial internet: Pushing the boundaries of minds and machines . https://www.ge.com/docs/chapters/Industrial_Internet.pdf . Available on May 28, 2017.

Fallera, C., & Feldmüllera, D. (2015). Industry 4.0 learning factory for regional SMEs. In The 5th conference on learning factories 2015 (Vol. 32, pp. 88–91).

Fanjiang, Y., Syu, Y., & Kuo, J. (2016). Search based approach to forecasting QoS attributes of web services using genetic programming. Information and Software Technology, 80, 158–174.

Fariss, M., Asaidi, H., & Bellouki, M. (2018). Comparative study of skyline algorithms for selecting Web Services based on QoS. The First International Conference On Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences, 127, 408–415.

Feldmann, A. (2011). A strategic perspective on plants in manufacturing networks. Division of Production Economics Department of Management and Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 581–583. ISBN: 978-91-7393-134-2.

Filaretov, V. F., & Pryyanichnikov, V. E. (2015). Autonomous mobile university robots AMUR: Technology and applications to extreme robotics. Procedia Engineering, 100, 269–277.

Filippi, S., & Barattin, D. (2012). Classification and selection of prototyping activities for interaction design. Intelligent Information Management, 4, 147–156.

Finin, T., Labrou, Y., & Mayfied, J. (1995). KQML as an agent communication language. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software agents . Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262522342.

Flammini, E., & Sisinni, E. (2012). Wireless sensor networking in the internet of things and cloud computing era. Procedia Engineering, 87 (2014), 672–679.

Fleisch, E., Weinberger, M., & Wortmann, F. (2014). Business models and the internet of things. Bosch IoT Lab Whitepaper, University of St. Gallen . http://cocoa.ethz.ch/downloads/2014/10/2090_EN_Bosch%20Lab%20White%20Paper%20GM%20im%20IOT%201_2.pdf . Available on May 28, 2017.

Flores-Abad, A., Ma, Q., Pham, K., & Ulrich, S. (2014). A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 68, 1–26.

Foehr, M., Vollmar, J., Calà, A., Leitão, P., Karnouskos, S., & Colombo A. W. (2017). Engineering of next generation cyber-physical automation system architectures. In MultiDisciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, pp. 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_8 .

Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T., & Hartmann, E. (2015). Drivers of supplier sustainability: Moving beyond compliance to commitment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51 (1), 67–92.

Forti, T., & Munteanub, V. (2017). Topics in cloud incident management. Future Generation Computer Systems, 72, 163–164.

Foster, K., Smith, G., Ariyachandra, T., & Frolick, M. (2015). Business intelligence competency center: Improving data and decisions. Information Systems Management, 32 (3), 229–233.

Framinan, J., & Pierreval, H. (2012). Special issue on pull strategies in manufacturing systems and supply chains: Recent advances. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 1–3.

Francis, H., & Kusiak, A. (2017). Prediction of engine demand with a data-driven approach. Procedia Computer Science, 103, 28–35.

Friedberg, I., McLaughlin, K., Smith, P., Laverty, D., & Seze, S. (2016). STPA-SafeSec: Safety and security analysis for cyber-physical systems. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2 (2), 123–133.

FUSION. (2016). http://fusion-edu.eu/FUSION/ . Available on August 30, 2017.

Gabrel, V., Manouvrier, M., Moreau, K., & Murat, C. (2018). QoS-aware automatic syntactic service composition problem: Complexity and resolution. Future Generation Computer Systems, 80, 311–321.

Gaikwad, P. P., Gabhane, J. P., & Golait, S. S. (2015). A survey based on Smart Homes system using Internet-of-Things. In Computation of power, energy information and communication (ICCPEIC) (pp. 0330–0335).

Gajos, K., Weisman, L., & Shrobe, H. (2001). Design principles for resource management systems for intelligent spaces. International Workshop on Self-Adaptive Software, 36, 198–215.

Galaske, N., & Anderl, R. (2016). Disruption management for resilient processes in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, 50, 442–447.

Gao, Y., Yang, T., & Bo, H. (2014). Improving the transmission reliability in smart factory through spatial diversity with ARQ. In IEEE/CIC international conference on communication in China , 27–29 July 2016, Chengdu, China.

Gash, D., Ariyachandra, T., & Frolick, M. (2011). Looking to the clouds for business intelligence. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10 (4), 261–269.

Gaurav, D. (2017). What is the difference between digital manufacturing and virtual manufacturing, Quora . https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-Digital-Manufacturing-and-Virtual-Manufacturing . Available on August 28, 2017.

Gawanda, H., & Roya, K. (2015). Online monitoring of a cyber physical system against control aware cyber attacks. Engineering Services, 70, 238–244.

Gay, S., & Nieuwoudt, L. (2010). Results of a trade simulation model for the South African fresh orange industry. Agrekon, 38 (4), 707–715.

Ge, M., Hong, J., Guttman, W., & Kim, D. (2014). A framework for automating security analysis of the internet of things. Procedia Technology, 83, 12–27.

Geeta, R. B., Totad, G., Reddy, P., & Shobha, R. B. (2015). Big data structure and usage mining coalition. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 21 (6), 252–271.

Gelbmann, U., & Hammerl, B. (2015). Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product–service-systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 50–60.

Gen, M., & Hwang, H. (2011). Advanced models and optimization in manufacturing and logistics systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 343–344.

German Ministry of Education. (2016). Industry 4.0 platform, recommendations of industry 4.0 applications . http://www.din.de/blob/65354/f5252239daa596d8c4d1f24b40e4486d/roadmap-i4-0-e-data.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Gharbic, G., Guermoucheb, N., & Monteil, T. (2014). Timed verification of machine-to-machine communications. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1071–1078.

Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2016). Production and evaluation of educational material using augmented reality for teaching the module of “representation of the information on computers” in junior high school. Creative Education, 7, 1270–1291.

Giusto, D., Lera, A., Morabito, G., & Atzori, L. (Eds.) (2010). The internet of things: 20th Tyrrhenian workshop on digital communications . Springer. ISBN-10: 1441916733.

Gjeldum, N., Mladineoa, M., & Vezaa, I. (2016). Transfer of model of innovative smart factory to croatian economy using lean learning factory. Procedia CIRP, 54, 158–163.

Gökalp, M., Kayabay, K., Akyol, M., Eren, E., & Kocyigit. A. (2016). Big data for industry 4.0: A conceptual framework. In 2016 International conference on computational science and computational intelligence , 15–17 December 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Golova, N., & Rönnbäck, L. (2016). Big data normalization for massively parallel processing database. Computer Standard, 54 (Part 2), 86–93.

Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., & Savarese, S. (2009). D4AR—A 4-dimensional augmented reality model for automating construction progress monitoring data collection, processing and communication. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 14, 81–97.

Gonzales-Coma, J. P., Joham, M., Castro, P., & Castedo, L. (2018). QoS constrained power minimization in the multiple stream MIMO broadcast channel. Signal Processing, 143, 48–55.

Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., & Zühlke, D., (2014). Human–machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (pp. 289–294).

Granell, C., Havlik, D., Schade, S., Sabeur, Z., Delaney, C., Pielorz, J., et al. (2016). Future internet technologies for environmental applications. Enviromental Modelling and Software, 78, 1–15.

Greenyera, J., Gritznera, D., Katzb, G., Marronb, A., Gladea, N., Gutjahra, T., et al. (2016). Distributed execution of scenario-based specifications of structurally dynamic cyber-physical systems. Engineering Services, 26, 552–559.

Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., & Zawistowski, P. (2012). A soft computing system using intelligent imputation strategies for roughness prediction in deep drilling. Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, 23 (5), 1733–1743.

GTAI. (2017). Industries 4.0, http://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Navigation/EN/Invest/Industries/Industrie-4-0/Industrie-4-0/industrie-4-0-what-is-it.html#overviewAnker . Available on November 11, 2017.

Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29, 1645–1660.

Gudfinnsson, K., Strand, M., & Berntsson, M. (2015). Analyzing business intelligence maturity. Journal of Decision Systems, 24 (1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2015.994287 .

Guide, V. D. R., Jr., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). OR FORUM—The evolution of closedloop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57 (1), 10–18.

Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (12), 2819–2840.

Guo, K., Liang, Z., Tang, Y., & Chi, T. (2016). SOR: An optimized semantic ontology retrieval algorithm for heterogeneous multimedia big data. International Journal of Information, 4, 25–35.

Guoa, Z., Zhanga, Z., & Li, W. (2012). Establishment of intelligent identification management platform in railway logistics system by means of the internet of things. Procedia Engineering, 29, 726–730.

Gupta, M., & George, J. (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Information Management, 53 (8), 1049–1064.

Gursoy, M. C., Qiao, D., & Velipasalar, S. (2008). Analysis of energy efficiency in fading channels under QoS constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8, 1276–1536.

Haddara, M., & Elragal, A. (2015). The readiness of ERP systems for the factory of the future. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 721–728.

Haquea, S., & Aziz, S. (2013). False alarm detection in cyber-physical systems for healthcare applications. Engineering Services, 5, 54–61.

Hardy, K., & Maurushat, A. (2016). Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit. Journal of Business Research, 33 (1), 30–37.

Hartunga, R., Hakanssonb, A., & Moradianc, E. (2015). A prescription for cyber physical systems. Manufacturing System, 5, 4–9.

Hashem, I., Chang, V., Anuar, N., Adewole, K., Yaquub, I., Gani, A., et al. (2016). The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of information, 36 (5), 748–758.

Hassanalieragh, M., Page, A., Soyata, T., Sharma, G., Aktas, M., Mateos, G., et al. (2015). Health monitoring and management using Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensing with cloud-based processing: Opportunities and challenges. In IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC) (pp. 285–292).

Hayyolalam, V., & Kazem, A. (2018). A systematic literature review on QoS-aware service composition and selection in cloud environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 110, 52–74.

Hazen, B., Boone, C., Farmer, L. A., & Ezell, J. (2014). Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. Internal Journal of Production, 154, 72–80.

Hazen, B. T., Skipper, J. B., Ezell, J. D., & Boone, C. A. (2016). Big Data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 592–598.

He, J., Chen, H., & Hu, F. (2015). ERP: An enhanced read policy for HDFS to improve read performance for files under construction. In 2015 IEEE international conference on progress in informatics and computing (PIC) , 18–20 December 2015, Nanjing, China.

He, K., & Li, X. (2016). A quantitative estimation technique for welding quality using local mean decomposition and support vector machine. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 525–533.

Hea, Y., Chena, L., & Wang, L. (2016). An improved direct anonymous attestation scheme for M2M networks. Computer Science, 15, 1481–1486.

Hecklau, F., Galeitzkea, M., Flachsa, S., & Kohl, H. (2015). Holistic approach for human resource management in industry 4.0. In Conference on learning factories , 10–11 October 2009, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Heng, S., Slomka, L., Ag, D. B., & Hoffmann, R. (2014). Industry 4.0. Upgrading of Germany’s industrial capabilities on the horizon . Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank Research. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2656608 .

Henriques, C. I., Sobreiro, V. A., & Kimura, H. (2018). Science and technology park: Future challenges. Technology in Society, 53, 144–160.

Heragu, S., & Kusiak, A. (1987). Analysis of expert systems in manufacturing design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17 (6), 898–912.

Hermann, M., Tobias, P., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industry 4.0 scenarios . http://www.thiagobranquinho.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Design-Principles-for-Industrie-4_0-Scenarios.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Herron, J. (2016). Augmented reality in medical education and training. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 13 (2), 51–55.

Herterich, M., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2015). The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 30, 323–328.

Higashinoa, W., Capretz, M., & Bittencourt, L. (2017). CEPSim: Modelling and simulation of complex event processing systems in cloud environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 65, 122–139.

Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34.

Holm, A., Wang, L., & Brewster, R. (2016). Localizing operators in the smart factory: A review of existing techniques and systems. In 2016 International symposium on flexible automation , 1–3 August 2016, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Hong, E.-K., Baek, J., Jang, Y., Na, J., & Kim, K. (2017). QoS-guaranteed scheduling for small cell networks. ICT Express . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.11.017 .

Hossain, M. S., & Muhammad, G. (2016). Cloud-assisted industrial internet of things (iiot)—Enabled framework for health monitoring. Computer Networks, 101, 192–202.

Houda, K., & Lakel, R. (2015). Synchronized communication in a set of autonomous mobile robots using bluetooth technology. Procedia Computer Science, 73, 154–161.

Hsiao, M. (2018). A conceptual framework for technology-enabled and technology dependent user behavior toward device mesh and mesh app. Future Business Journal, 4, 130–138.

Hu, T., Xiao, M., Hu, C., Gao, G., & Wang, B. (2017). A QoS-sensitive task assignment algorithm for mobile crowdsensing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 41, 333–342.

Huang, C., Liang, W., & Yi, S. (2017). Cloud-based design for disassembly to create environmentally friendly products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1203–1218.

Hubert, C., & Chan, Y. (2015). Internet of things business models. Journal of Service Science and Management, 50, 1020–1030.

Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., & Beloff, N. (2016). Internet of things blockchain, shared economy applications. Procedia Computer Science, 98 (2016), 461–466.

Hufnagel, J., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (2015). Data integration in manufacturing industry model-based integration of data distributed from ERP to PLC. In 13th International conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) , 22–24 July 2015, Cambridge, UK.

Hwang, G., Lee, J., Park, J., & Chang, T. (2016). Developing performance measurement system for Internet of Things and smart factory environment. International Journal of Production Research, 55 (9), 2590–2602.

I4MTS. (2016). http://www.the-mtc.org/pdf/Industry-4-Report-2016-e.pdf . Available on August 30, 2017.

Iavazzo, C., & Gkegkes, I. (2017). Cost–benefit analysis of robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 45, 7–18.

ICV. (2016). International controller association report . http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/137_International-Controller-Association-Discussion-Paper.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Iera, A., Floerkemeier, C., Mitsugi, J., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17, 8–9.

Ignaccolo, M. (2003). A simulation model for airport capacity and delay analysis. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26 (2), 135–170.

IIC. (2016). http://www.process-worldwide.com/usa-industry-40-the-american-way-a-536602/ . Available on August 30, 2017.

Ince, H., Imamoglu, S. Z., Keskin, H., Akgun, A., & Efe, M. A. (2013). The impact of ERP systems and supply chain management practices on firm performance: Case of Turkish companies. International Strategic Management Conference, 99, 1124–1133.

Inderfurth, K., de Kok, A. G., & Flapper, S. D. P. (2001). Product recovery in stochastic remanufacturing systems with multiple reuse options. European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 130–152.

INESA. (2016). http://journal.jp.fujitsu.com/en/2016/10/31/01/ . Available on August 30, 2017.

InGlobe. (2017). http://www.inglobetechnologies.com/smart-manufacturing-ar-industry-4-0 . Available on August 30, 2017.

Intel IOT Report. (2016). Developing solutions for the internet of things . http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/developing-solutions-for-iot.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Iqbal, A., Zhang, H., Kong, L., & Hussain, G. (2015). A rule-based system for trade-off among energy consumption, tool life, and productivity in machining process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26, 1217–1232.

Issa, H., Regenbrecht, H., & Hale, R. (2012). Augmented reality applications in rehabilitation to improve physical outcomes. Physical Therapy Reviews, 17 (1), 16–28.

Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2015). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54 (2), 386–402.

Jäckel, M., Falk, T., & Landgrebe, D. (2016). Concept for further development of self-pierce riveting by using cyber physical systems. Procedia CIRP, 44, 293–297.

Jaehne, J., & KalalChelvan, S. (2017). Towards a connected world of supply chain — Industry 4.0 presentation . https://www.slideshare.net/sarathygurushankar1/shaping-towards-a-connected-world-of-supply-chain-industrie-40 . Available on August 22, 2017.

Jannsenn, M., Voort, H., & Wahyudi, A. (2017). Factors influencing big data decision making quality. Journal of Business Research, 70, 338–345.

Jararweha, Y., Al-Ayyoub, M., Darabseh, A., Benkhelifa, E., Vouk, M., & Rindos, A. (2017). Software defined cloud: Survey, system and evaluation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 58, 56–74.

Jatzkowskia, J., & Kleinjohanna, B. (2016). Towards self-reconfiguration of real-time communication within cyber-physical systems. Manufacturing Systems, 15, 54–61.

Jayanthi, S., Roth, V., Kristal, M., & Venu, L. (2009). Strategic resource dynamics of manufacturing firms. Management Science, 55 (6), 1060–1076.

Jeang, A. (2015a). Robust product design and process planning in using process capability analysis. Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, 26 (3), 459–470.

Jeang, A. (2015b). Robust product design and process planning in using process capability analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26, 459–470.

Jeng, T., Tzeng, S., Tseng, C., & Liu, Y. (2016). The design and fabrication of a temperature diagnosis system for the intelligent rotating spindle of industry 4.0. Smart Science, 4, 38–43.

Jernigan, D., Fernandez, S., Pensyl, R., & Shangping, L. (2009). Digitally augmented reality characters in live theatre performances. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 5 (1), 35–49.

Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Meisen, T., Özdemir, D., & Eschert, T. (2017). Industrial internet of things and cyber manufacturing systems. In Industrial internet of things, international publishing (pp. 3–19).

Ji, Z., Ganchev, I., O’Droma, M., Zhao, L., & Zhang, X. (2014). A cloud-based car parking middleware for IoT-based smart cities: Design and implementation. Sensors, 14, 22372–22393.

Jianjuna, S., Xub, W., Jizhenc, G., & Yangzhou, C. (2016). The analysis of traffic control cyber-physical systems. Social and Behavioral Science, 96, 2487–2496.

Jiao, B., Zhou, Y., Du, J., Huang, C., Wang, J., & Li, B. (2015). A heuristic nonlinear operator for the aggregation of incomplete judgment matrices in group decision making. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26, 1253–1266.

Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A. V., Wan, J., Lu, J., & Qiu, D. (2014). Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 20, 2481–2501.

Johansson, B., Alajbegovic, A., & Alexopoulos, V. (2015). Cloud ERP adoption opportunities and concerns: The role of organizational size, system sciences (HICSS). In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp 1530–1605), 5–8 January 2015, Kauai, HI, USA.

Jones, A., Vidalis, S., & Abouzakhar, N. (2016). Information security and digital forensics in the world of cyber physical systems. In 2016 Eleventh international conference on digital information management (ICDIM) , 19–21 September, Porto, Portugal.

Jourdan, Z., Rainer, K., & Marshall, T. (2008). Business intelligence: An analysis of the literature. Information Systems Management, 25 (2), 121–131.

Junghanns, P., Fabian, B., & Ermakova, T. (2016). Engineering of secure multi-cloud storage. Computers in Industry, 83, 108–120.

Kagermann, H. (2014). Chancen von Industry 4.0 nutzen. In Bauernhansl, T., M. ten Hompel and B. Vogel - Heuser, Vol. 4, pp. 603–614 (in German) .

Kagermann, H., Lukas, W., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industry 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industryllen Revolution. VDI nachrichten , Vol. 13, pp. 1090–1100.

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industry 4.0 . Final report of the industry 4.0 working group, http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

Kaidanren. (2016). Toward realization of the new economy and society . Japan Business Federation (p. 8). http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/029_outline.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

Karakus, M., & Durresi, A. (2017). Quality of service (QoS) in software defined networking (SDN): A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 80, 200–218.

Kba, S. (2015). Cloud based health system. Computer Science, 18, 989–1000.

Ke, Y., Wang, P., Chen, Y., Gu, B., Qi, H., Zhou, P., et al. (2015). Concurrent mental activities affect ERPs and impair performance of ERP-spellers. In 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER) , 22–24 April 2015, Montpellier, France.

Kermorgant, O. (2018). A magnetic climbing robot to perform autonomous welding in the shipbuilding industry. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 53, 178–186.

Khan, R., Khan, S. U., Zaheer, R., Khan, S. (2012). Future internet: The internet of things architecture, possible applications and key challenges. In 10th International conference on frontiers of information technology (FIT) (pp. 257–260).

Kiel, D., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. I. (2017). The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies—A business level perspective. Technovation, 68, 4–19.

Kim, H., Lee, S., Park, H., & Lee, G. (2005). A model for a simulation-based shipbuilding system in a shipyard manufacturing process. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18 (6), 427–441.

Kim, J., Kim, H., Lakshmanan, K., & Rajkumar, R. R. (2013). Parallel scheduling for cyber-physical systems: Analysis and case study on a self-driving car. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 4th international conference on cyber - physical systems (pp. 31–40).

Kim, J., Lee, S., Seo, J., & Kamat, V. (2018). Modular data communication methods for a robotic excavator. Automation in Construction, 90, 166–177.

Kim, W., & Jo, O. (2015). Cost-optimized configuration of computing instances for large sized cloud systems. Computer Science, 5, 20–30.

Kim, Y., & Suzuki, K. (2015). Social context representation in product-service systems with internet of things. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 187–193.

Kirthica, S., & Sridhar, R. (2016). CIT: A cloud inter-operation toolkit to enhance elasticity and tolerate shut down of external clouds. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 85, 32–46.

Klaus, H. (2016). Siemens industry 4.0 report for german industry and applications . On the way industry 4.0. https://www.siemens.com/press/pool/de/events/2015/digitalfactory/2015-04-hannovermesse/presentation-e.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

Klimeš, J. (2014). Using formal concept analysis for control in cyber-physical systems. Engineering Services, 69, 1518–1522.

Kokuryo, D., Kaihara, T., Suginouchi, S., & Kuik, S. (2016). A study on value co-creative design and manufacturing system for tailor-made rubber shoes production. In 2016 International symposium on flexible automation , 1–3 August 2016, Ohio, USA.

Kolberg, D., Berger, C., Pirvu, B., Franke, M., & Michniewicz, J. (2016). Insights from a framework for designing cyber-physical systems in production environments. Procedia CIRP, 57, 32–37.

Koo, D., Piratla, K., & Matthews, J. (2015). Towards sustainable water supply: Schematic development of big data collection using internet of things. Procedia Computer Engineering, 4, 45–55.

Koseleva, N., & Ropaite, G. (2017). Big data in building energy efficiency: Understanding of big data and main challenges. Procedia Engineering, 172 (2017), 544–549.

Kothandaraman, D., & Chellappan, C. (2016). Direction detecting system of indoor Smartphone users using BLE in IoT. Circuits and Systems, 7, 1492–1503.

Kowalska, M., Pazdzior, M., & Maziopa, A. (2018). Erratum to: Implementation of QFD method in quality analysis of confectionery products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 449–450.

Kozhirbayev, Z., & Sinnott, R. (2017). A performance comparison of container-based technologies for the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 68, 175–182.

Krawatzeck, R., & Dinter, B. (2015). Agile business intelligence: Collection and classification of agile business intelligence actions by means of a catalog and a selection guide. Information Systems Management, 32 (3), 177–191.

Kumar, J., & Zaveri, M. (2016). Hierarchical clustering for dynamic and heterogeneous internet of things. Computer Science, 93, 276–282.

Kurth, M., & Syleyer, C. (2016). Smart factory and education. In 2016 IEEE 11th conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA) (pp. 110–119), 5–7 June 2016, Hefei, China.

Kusiak, A. (2009). Short-term prediction of wind farm power: A data mining approach. Wind Energy Journal, 12 (3), 275–293.

Kusiak, A. (2012). A data-mining approach to monitoring wind turbines. Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 3 (1), 150–165.

Kusiak, A. (2013). Innovation: The living laboratory perspective. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 4 (6), 196–206.

Kusiak, A. (2017a). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research . https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 .

Kusiak, A. (2017b). Smart manufacturing must embrace big data. Nature, 544 (7648), 23–25.

Kusiak, A., Zheng, H., & Song, Z. (2010). Power optimization of wind turbines with data mining and evolutionary computation. Renewable Energy, 35 (3), 695–702.

Kyriazisa, D., & Varvarigoua, T. (2013). Smart, autonomous and reliable Internet of Things. Computer Science, 21 (2013), 442–448.

Lakhmi, C. J., & Nguyen, N. T. (2009). Knowledge processing and decision making in agent - based systems . Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-88048-6.

Lakshimi, R., Babu, S., & Bhalaji, N. (2017). Analysis of clustered QoS routing protocol for distributed wireless sensor network. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 64, 173–181.

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0: Bedarfssog und Technologiedruck als Treiber der vierten Industrillen Revolution. The İnternational Journal of Wirtschaftsinformatik, 56, 261–264. (in German) .

Layuan, L., & Chunlin, L. (2002). A multicast routing protocol supporting multiple QoS constraints. In 10th IEEE international conference on networks (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1109/icon.2002.1033285 .

Lee, A. (2008). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In 11th IEEE symposium on object oriented real - time distributed computing (ISORC) , 5–7 May 2008, Orlando, FL, USA.

Lee, D. (2014). Robots in the shipbuilding industry. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30, 442–450.

Lee, H., Leu, J., & Huang, Y. (2015c). Implementation of enterprise resource planning using the value engineering and system dynamics methods. In 2015 2nd International conference on information science and control engineering (ICISCE) , 24–26 April 2015, Shanghai, China.

Lee, J., & Shin, K. (2017). Development and use of a new task model for cyber-physical systems: A real-time scheduling perspective. Journal of System, 126, 45–56.

Lee, J., Ardakani, H., Yang, S., & Bagheri, B. (2015a). Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance & service innovation. Procedia CIRP, 38, 3–7.

Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. (2015b). A cyber systems architecture for industry 4.0 based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.

Lee, J., Kao, H. A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp, 16, 3–8.

Lee, J., & Lapira, E. (2014). Industry 4.0 environment. Asset Condition Management, 15, 54–61.

Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1 (1), 38–41.

Lee, H., Yoo, S., & Kim, Y. (2016). An energy management framework for smart factory on context awareness. In 18th International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT) , 31 January–3 February 2016, Pyeongchang, South Korea.

Lei, C., Wan, K., & Man, K. (2013). Developing a smart learning environment in universities via cyber-physical systems. Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 17, 583–585.

Leloglu, E. (2017). A review of security concerns in internet of things. Journal of Computer and Communications, 5, 121–136.

Leppelt, T., Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., & Hartmann, E. (2013). Sustainability management beyond organizational boundaries–sustainable supplier relationship management in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 94–102.

Li, B., Song, A. M., & Song, J. (2012). A distributed QoS-constraint task scheduling scheme in cloud computing environment: Model and algorithm. Advances in information Sciences and Service Sciences (AISS), 4, 283–291.

Li, G., Zhang, D., Zheng, K., Ming, X., Pan, H., & Jiang, K. (2013). A kind of new multicast routing algorithm for application of internet of things. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11 (4), 578–585.

Li, J., Xie, T., & Du, S. (2011). Requirements analysis on flexibility of ERP system of medium and small publishers. Procedia Engineering, 15, 5493–5497.

Li, Z., Shen, H., Li, H., Xia, G., Gamba, P., & Zhang, L. (2017). Multi-feature combined cloud and cloud shadow detection in GaoFen-1 wide field of view imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191, 342–358.

Lia, B., & Yub, B. (2011). Research and application on the smart home based on component technologies and Internet of Things. Procedia Engineering, 15, 2087–2092.

Liang, H., & Du, Y. (2017). Dynamic service selection with QoS constraints and inter-service correlations using cooperative coevolution. Future Generation Computer Systems, 76, 119–135.

Lian-yue, W. (2012). Think of construction lean SCM based on IOT. In IEEE Symposium on Robotics and Applications (ISRA) (pp. 436–438).

Liao, T. (2015). Augmented or admented reality? The influence of marketing on augmented reality technologies. Information, Communication and Society, 18 (3), 310–326.

Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E., & Ramos, L. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55 (12), 3609–3629.

Lichtblau, K., Stıch, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, R., Bleider, M., Millack, A., et al. (2016). IMPULS, Industry 4.0 readiness, VDMA . http://industrie40.vdma.org/documents/4214230/5356229/Industrie%204.0%20Readiness%20Study%20English.pdf/f6de92c1-74ed-4790-b6a4-74b30b1e83f0 . Available on August 28, 2017.

Lilis, G., Conus, G., Asadi, N., & Kayal, M. (2017). Towards the next generation of intelligent building: An assessment study of current automation and future IoT based systems with a proposal for transitional design. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 473–481.

Lim, M. K., Tseng, M. L., Tan, K. H., & Bui, T. D. (2017). Knowledge management in sustainable supply chain management: Improving performance through an interpretive structural modelling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 806–816.

Lin, T., Chen, M., Yang, D., & Chen, Y. (2016). New method for industry 4.0 machine status prediction—A case study with the machine of a spring factory. In 2016 International computer symposium , 15–17 December 2016, Chiayi, Taiwan.

Lin, Y. C., Hung, M. H., Huang, H. C., Chen, C. C., Yang, H. C., Hsieh, Y. S., et al. (2017a). Development of advanced manufacturing cloud of things (AMCoT)—A smart manufacturing platform. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2, 1809–1816.

Lin, D., Lee, C., Lau, H., & Yang, Y. (2017c). Strategic response to Industry 4.0: An empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems , 118 (3), 589–605.

Lin, B., Lin, F., & Tung, L. (2016b). The roles of 5G mobile broadband in the development of IoT, big data, cloud and SDN. Communications and Network, 8, 9–21.

Lin, C., Wnag, K., & Deng, G. (2017b). A QoS-aware routing in SDN hybrid networks. Procedia Computer Science, 110, 242–249.

Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of operations management, 25, 1075–1082.

Liu, D., & Hu, X. (2006). Firm real-time system scheduling based on a novel QoS constraint. IEEE Transactıons on Computers, 55, 1–14.

Liu, J., & Tonga, W. (2012). Device service networks maintenance based on components migration in the internet of things. Procedia Engineering, 29, 3418–3423.

Liu, M., Ma, J., Lin, L., Ge, M., Wang, Q., & Liu, C. (2017b). Intelligent assembly system for mechanical products and key technology based on internet of things. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28 (2), 271–299.

Liu, X., Guo, X., Chen, L., Zhou, Y., & Xin, C. (2014). The use of three-dimensional integrated design system in smart substation design. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 2, 632–638.

Liu, Z., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhao, M. (2017a). Practical-oriented protocols for privacy-preserving outsourced big data analysis: Challenges and future research directions. Computers and Security, 69, 97–113.

Lokers, R., Knapen, K., Sander, J., Randen, Y., & Jansen, J. (2016). Analysis of big data technologies for use in agro-environmental science. Modelling Software, 4, 1090–1105.

Lom, M., Pribyl, O., & Svitek, M. (2016). Industry 4.0 as a part of smart cities. Smart Cities Symposium , 26–27 May 2016, Prague, Czech Republic.

Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., & Padovano, A. (2017). Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 144–159.

Lorenc, A., & Szkoda, M. (2015). Customer logistic service in the automotive industry with the use of the SAP ERP system. In 2015 4th International conference on advanced logistics and transport (ICALT), 20–22 May 2015, Valenciennes, France.

Loseto, G., Ieva, S., Gramegna, F., Ruta, M., Scioscia, F., & Sciascio, E. (2016). Linking the web of things: LDP-CoAP mapping. Computer Science, 83, 1182–1187.

Lucke, A. (2008). Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier. In The 41st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, Tokyo, Japan (Vol 2, pp. 115–118).

Maansman, J., Böcker, S., Rettberg, F., Wietfeld, C., & Rehtanz, C. (2014). Renewable energies in smart factories with electric vehicle fleets. In 49th International universities power engineering conference (UPEC) , Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Macabee, S., Landis, R., & Burke, M. (2017). Inductive reasoning: The promise of big data. Human Resource Management, 27 (2), 277–290.

Machowiak, W. (2012). Risk management—Unappreciated instrument of supply chain strategy. LogForum, 8, 277–285.

Madani, S. R., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 287–298.

Magdić, J., & Car, Z. (2013). A company model supporting ERP and CRM software development and implementation processes. In 12th International conference on telecommunications (ConTEL) , 26–28 June 2013, Zagreb, Croatia.

Majeed, A. A., & Rupasinghe, T. D. (2017). Internet of things (IoT) embedded future supply chains for industry 4.0: An assessment from an ERP-based fashion apparel and footwear industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6, 25–40.

Marron, J. S. (2014). Big data in context and robustness against heterogeneity. Computer Science, 2, 73–80.

Martin, P., & Dantan, J. (2011). Virtual manufacturing: Prediction of work piece. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24, 620–626.

Martinez, G., & Munizaga, M. (2016). Workshop 5 report: Harnessing big data. Research in Transportation economics, 59, 236–241.

Matena, V., Bures, T., Gerostathopoulos, I., & Hnetynka, P. (2016). Model problem and testbed for experiments with adaptation in smart cyber-physical systems. In Software engineering for IEEE/ACM, 11th international symposium on adaptive and self - managing systems (SEAMS), 16–17 May 2016, Austin, TX, USA.

Matutinovic, I., Salthe, S., & Ulanowicz, R. (2016). The mature stage of capitalist development: Models, signs, policy, implications. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 39, 17–30.

Mawlawi, B., Dore, J., Lebedev, N., & Gorce, J. (2014). Performance evaluation of multiband CSMA/CA with RTS/CTS or M2M. In International conference on selected topics in mobile and wireless networking , Rome, Italy (Vol. 40, pp. 108–115).

Mayer, S., Verborgh, R., Kovatsch, M., & Mattern, F. (2016). Smart configuration on smart environments. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13 (3), 1247–1255.

McCullough, A., Gempesaw, C., Daniels, W., & Bacon, R. (2008). Simulating the economic viability of crawfish production: A two stage modeling approach. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 5 (2), 69–79.

Mckinsey. (2016). Industry 4.0: How to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector . https://www.mckinsey.de/files/mck_industry_40_report.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

McKinsey. (2017). China develops from ‘sponge’ into innovation leader . https://www.your-bizbook.com/en/Club-China-News/mckinsey-china-develops-from-sponge-into-innovation-leader . Available on November 19, 2017.

Meddeb, M., Alaya, S., Monteil, T., Dhraief, A., & Drira, K. (2014). M2M platform with autonomic device management service. Computer Science, 32, 1063–1070.

MESA. (2009). Smart manufacturing in industry 4.0 systems, mesa international report for industry 4.0 systems . http://www.mesa.org/en/resources/MESAWhitePaper52-SmartManufacturing-LandscapeExplainedShortVersion.pdf . Available on August 22, 2017.

MetamoFAB. (2017). https://www.festo.com/group/en/cms/10275.htm . Available on August 30, 2017.

Meziane, F., Vadera, S., Kobbacy, K., & Proudlove, N. (2014). Intelligent systems in manufacturing: Current developments and future prospects. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11 (4), 218–238.

Michniewicza, J., & Reinharta, G. (2016). Cyber-physical robotics—Automated analysis, programming and configuration of robot cells based on cyber-physical-systems. Engineering Services, 15, 566–575.

Michona, E., Gossa, J., Genaud, S., Unbekandt, L., & Kherbache, V. (2017). Schlouder: A broker for IaaS clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 69, 11–23.

Mikusz, M. (2014). Towards an understanding of cyber-physical systems as industrial software-product-service systems. Procedia CIRP, 16, 385–389.

Miloslavskaya, N., & Tolstoy, A. (2017). Big data, fast data and data lake concepts. Procedia Engineering, 88 (2016), 300–305.

Ming, B., Shuo, T., Mingsan, M., Jiaojiao, J., & Weiyun, X. (2015). Big data applications in traditional Chinese medicine research. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 21 (4), 294–300.

Mirsanei, H. S., Zandieh, M., Moayed, M. J., & Khabbazi, M. R. (2011). A simulated annealing algorithm approach to hybrid flow shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 965–978.

Miškuf, M., & Zolotová, I. (2016). Comparison between multi-class classifiers and deep learning with focus on industry 4.0. Cybernetics & Informatics (pp. 1–5), 2–5 February 2016.

Mohammed, A., & Wang, L. (2018). Brainwaves driven human–robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 1781, 1–4.

Mokhtar, B., & Eltoweissy, M. (2017). Big data and semantics management system. Ad Hoc Networks, 57, 32–51.

Monostori, L. (2014). Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP, 17, 9–13.

Monteiroa, V., Ferreirab, J., & Afonso, J. (2014). Smart platform towards batteries analysis based on internet-of-things. Procedia Computer Egineering, 17 (2014), 520–527.

Moon, S., Kang, S., Jeon, J., & Chun, I. (2016). Simulation modeling of sewing process, for evaluation, of production schedule in smart factory. In 2016 International conference on industrial engineering, management science and application (ICIMSA), 23–26 May 2016, Jeju, South Korea.

Moregård, A., Haubenwallera, A., & Vandikasb, K. (2015). Computations on the edge in the internet of things. Computer Science, 52, 29–34.

Mourtzis, D., Zogopoulos, V., & Vlachou, E. (2017). Augmented reality application to support remote maintenance as a service in the robotics industry. Procedia CIRP, 63, 46–51.

Mucci, H., Sharaf, M., & Weyns, D. (2016). Self-adaptation for cyber-physical systems: A systematic literature review. In 2016 IEEE/ACM 11th international symposium on software engineering for adaptive and self - managing systems (SEAMS) , 16–17 May 2016, Austin, TX, USA.

Müller, R. (2016). Planning and developing cyber-physical assembly systems by connecting virtual and real worlds. Procedia CIRP, 52, 35–40.

Munera, E., Luis, L., Lujan, P., Luis, J., Yagüe, P., Simo, J., et al. (2015). Control kernel in smart factory, environments, smart resources integration. In The 5th annual IEEE international conference on cyber technology in automation , 8–12 June 2015, Shenyang, China.

Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98–129.

Nawrocki, P., & Reszelewski, W. (2017). Resource usage optimization in mobile cloud computing. Journal Computer Communications, 99 (C), 1–12.

Nazarko, L. (2017). Future-oriented technology assessment. Procedia Engineering, 182, 504–509.

Negash, B., Rahmani, A., Westelund, T., Liljeberg, P., & Tenhunen, H. (2015). LISA: Lightweight internet of things service bus architecture. Computer Science, 52 (2015), 436–443.

Neisse, R., Steri, G., & Favino, I. (2014). A model based security toolkit for the IOT. In 9th International conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES) , 8–12 September 2014, Fribourg, Switzerland (pp.78–87).

Netland, T. (2016). Augmented reality: Ready for manufacturing industries . Better Operations, The Routledge Companion to Lean Management. http://better-operations.com/2016/10/07/augmented-reality-manufacturing/ . Available on August 28, 2017.

Nguyen, P., Shaukat, A., & Tao, Y. (2017). Model-based security engineering for cyber-physical systems: A systematic mapping study. Information Software, 83, 116–135.

Ning, H., & Liu, H. (2012). Cyber-physical-social based security architecture for future internet of things. Advances in Internet of Things, 2, 1–7.

Nishioka, Y. (2016). https://iv-i.org/en/docs/doc_160428_hannover.pdf . Available on August 30, 2017.

Nofal, M., & Yusof, Z. (2013). Integration of business intelligence and enterprice resource planning within organizations. Procedia Technology, 11, 658–665.

Nordahla, M., & Magnussona, B. (2015). A lightweight data interchange format for Internet of Things in the PalCom middleware framework. Computer Science, 56 (2015), 284–291.

NTIO. (2017). Smart Cities Taiwan: Opportunities for Dutch companies . https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2017/05/taiwan-ambition-and-development-of-smart-citiesv2.pdf .

Nuñez, D., Fernández, G., & Luna, J. (2017). Cloud system. Procedia Computer Engineering, 62, 149–164.

Oesterreich, D. T., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitalization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 83, 121–139.

Ojha, T., Misra, S., & Raghuwanshi, N. (2017). Sensing-cloud: Leveraging the benefits for agricultural applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 135, 96–107.

Olszak, C. (2016). Toward better understanding and use of business intelligence in organizations. Information Systems Management, 32 (2), 105–123.

Ong, S. K., Yuan, M. L., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2008). Augmented reality applications in manufacturing: A survey. International Journal of Production Research, 46, 2707–2742.

Onime, C., & Abiona, O. (2016). 3D mobile augmented reality interface for laboratory experiments. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 9, 67–76.

OPAK. (2017). A industry 4.0 project “open engineering platform for autonomous mechatronic automation components in a function - oriented architecture” . https://www.automation.com/automation-news/industry/festo-to-demonstrate-opak-industry-40-research . Available on August 28, 2017.

Orasız, S., & Yörök, G. (2012). Key performance indicators used in ERP performance measurement applications. In IEEE 10th jubilee international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics (SISY) (pp.43–48), 20–22 September 2012, Subotica, Serbia.

Ospennikova, A., Ershov, M., & Iljin, I. (2015). Educational robotics as an inovative educational technology. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 18–26.

Ou, C. S., Liu, F. C., Hung, Y. C., & Yen, D. C. (2010). A structural model of supply chain management on firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 526–545.

Oztemel, E. (2010). Intelligent manufacturing systems. In L. Benyoucef & B. Grabot (Eds.), Artificial intelligence techniques for networked manufacturing enterprises management, chapter 1 . Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-1-84996-118-9.

Oztemel, E. (2015). Special issue on “Current progress of intelligent technologies, for manufacturing society”. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26, 959–960.

Oztemel, E., & Tekez, K. (2009a). A general framework of a reference model for intelligent integrated manufacturing systems (REMIMS). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 22 (6), 855–864.

Oztemel, E., & Tekez, E. (2009b). Integrating manufacturing systems through knowledge exchange protocols within an agent based knowledge network. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25 (1), 235–245.

Oztemel, E., & Tekez, E. (2009c). Knowledge protocols. In M. M. Cunha, E. F. Olivera, A. J.Tavares, & L. G.Ferreira (Eds.), Handbook of research on social dimensions of semantic technologies and web services (pp. 304–324). ISBN: 978-1-60566-650-1, Chapter 15, IGI Global, USA, PA.

Paelke, V. (2014). Augmented reality in the smart factory: Supporting workers in an industry 4.0. Environment, emerging technology and factory automation (ETFA) (pp. 1–4).

Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50 (1), 44–55.

Palanisamy, R. (2008). Organizational culture and knowledge management in ERP implementation: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48 (2), 100–120.

Pan, M., & Kraft, M. (2015). Applying industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island eco-park. Energy Procedia, 75, 1536–1541.

Pandey, R. K., & Panda, S. S. (2015). Optimization of bone drilling using Taguchi methodology coupled with fuzzy based desirability function approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26, 1121–1129.

Pandya, A., Siadat, M., & Auner, G. (2005). Design, implementation and accuracy of a prototype for medical augmented reality. Computer Aided Surgery, 10 (1), 23–35.

Pang, Z. (2013). Technologies and architectures of the ınternet-of-things (IoT) for health and well-being. Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/222d/206e8fc758c19ac06680db61a555fd6b71ed.pdf .

Pang, Z., Chen, Q., & Zheng, L. (2012). Value creation, sensor portfolio and information fusion of internet-of-things solutions for food supply chains. Information Systems Frontiers, Information Systems Fronties, 17, 289–319.

Papadakis, L., Schober, A., & Zaeh, M. (2013). Considering manufacturing effects in automotive structural crashworthiness: A simulation chaining approach. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 18 (3), 276–287.

Park, H., Kim, H., Joo, H., & Song, J. (2016). Recent advancement in the IOT related standards a one M2M perspective. ICT Express, 2 (3), 126–129.

Park, J. (2010). A smart factory operation method for a smart grid, information systems engineering. In 2010 40th international conference on computers and industrial engineering (CIE) , 25–28 July 2010, Awaji, Japan.

Park, S. (2016). Development of innovative strategies for the Korean manufacturing industry by use of the connected smart factory. Computer Science, 91 (2016), 744–750.

Parkhi, S., Joshi, S., Gupta, S., & Sharma, M. (2015). a study of evolution and future of supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 9, 95–106.

ParsiFAI. (2017). https://www.festo.com/group/en/cms/12002.htm . Available on August 30, 2017.

Pence, H. (2010). Smartphones, smart objects, and augmented reality. The Reference Librarian, 52 (1), 136–145.

Peng, Q., Chung, C., Yu, C., & Luan, T. (2007). A networked virtual manufacturing system for SMEs. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20, 71–79.

Peng, Y., Xie, D., & Shemshadi, A. (2013). A network storage framework for internet of things. Computer Science, 19, 1136–1141.

Peres, R., Parreira-Rocha, M., Rocha, A., Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., & Barata, J.(2016). Selection of a data exchange format for industry 4.0 manufacturing systems, industrial electronics society. In IECON 2016 — 42nd annual conference of the IEEE (pp. 5723–5728), 23–26 October 2016, Florence, Italy.

Perkinsa, C., & Mullera, G. (2015). Using discrete event simulation to model attacker interactions with cyber and physical security systems. Procedia Computer Science, 61, 221–226.

Persson, M., & Håkansson, A. (2015). A communication protocol for different communication technologies in cyber-physical system. Engineering Services, 60, 1697–1706.

Petnga, L., & Austin, M. (2013). Ontologies of time and time-based reasoning for MBSE of cyber-physical systems. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 403–412.

Pfohl, H., & Yahsi, B. (2016). The impact of industry supply chain. Published in: Innovations and strategies for logistics an Wolfgang Kersten, Thorsten Blecker and Christian M. Ri, Vol. 2, pp. 120–131, Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL) ISBN (online): 978-3-7375-4059-9, 4430.

Piccialli, F., Benedusi, P., & Amato, F. (2017). S-InTime: A social cloud analytical service oriented system. Future Generation Computer Systems, 45, 699–705.

Pimenov, D. Y., Bustillo, A., & Mikolajczyk, T. (2018). Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 1045–1061.

Pisching, M. A., Junqueira, F., Santos Filho, D. J., & Miyagi, P. E., (2015). An architecture for organizing and locating services to the industry 4.0. In Proceedings of 23rd ABCM international congress of mechanical engineering (pp. 1–4).

Plansee. (2017). Industry 4.0 project . https://www.plansee.com/en/news-archive/News/detail/research-project-on-industry-40-shaping-the-future-together.html . Available on August 28, 2017.

Plattform Industry 4.0. (2014). Plattform industry 4.0 . http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/image/document/2016-27/10__pi40_diemer_16494.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

PNC. (2016). PNC industry 4.0 report . https://www.pnc.com/content/dam/pnc-ideas/articles/insurance-industry-article.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Poghosyana, G., Pefkianakisb, I., Guyadecc, P., & Christophidesd, V. (2016). Mining usage patterns in residential intranet of things. Computer Science, 83 (2016), 988–993.

Pokharel, S., & Mutha, A. (2009). Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 175–182.

Pollock, N., & Cornford, J. (1999). Customizing manufacturing system for universities. International Journal of Mass Customization, 4 (3), 171–194.

Potts, J., & Cunningham, S. (2008). Four models of creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14 (3), 233–247.

Prajogo, D., Chowdhury, M., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 136, 123–130.

Prinz, C., Morlock, F., Freith, S., Kreggenfeld, N., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2016). Learning factory modules. Procedia CIRP, 54, 113–118.

Puttonen, J., Lobov, A., Soto, M., & Lastra, M. L. (2016). Cloud computing as a facilitator for web service composition in factory automation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 689–700.

Qiao, D. (2009). The impact of QoS constraints on the energy efficiency of fixed-rate wireless transmissions. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8, 5957–5969.

Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. (2016). A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP, 52, 173–178.

Qiu, X., Luo, H., Xu, G., Zhong, R., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Physical assets and service sharing for IoT-enabled Supply Hub in Industrial Park (SHIP). International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 4–15.

Qiuping, W., Shunbinga, Z., & Chunquan, D. (2011). Study on key technologies of internet of things perceiving mine. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 2326–2333.

Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers, M., & Madsen, E. S. (2014). The smart factory: Exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1184–1190.

Rago, F. (2015). A smart adaptable architecture based on contexts for cyber physical systems. Engineering Services, 61, 301–306.

Ramezani, J., & Jassbi, J. (2017). A hybrid expert decision support system based on artificial neural networks in process control of plaster production—An industry 4.0 perspective, technological innovation for smart systems. IFIP advances in information and communication technology (Vol 499, pp. 55–71).

Ranjan, A., & Hussain, M. (2016). Terminal authentication in M2M communications in the context of internet of things. Computer Science, 89 (2016), 34–42.

Rashid, M., Riaz, Z., Turan, E., Haskilic, V., Sunje, A., & Khan, N. (2012). Smart factory: E-business perspective of enhanced ERP in aircraft manufacturing industry. In 2012 Proceedings of technology management for emerging technologies (PICMET’12) (pp. 3262–3275), 29 July–2 August 2012, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Raza, S., Misra, P., He, Z., & Voigt, T. (2017). Building the internet of things with bluetooth smart. AdHoc Networks, 57, 19–31.

Remon, D. (2017). Smart factory: Reducing maintenance costs and ensuring quality in the manufacturing process. http://www.libelium.com/smart-factory-reducing-maintenance-costs-ensuring-quality-manufacturing-process/ . Available on August 22, 2017.

Rennunga, F., Luminosua, C., & Draghicia, A. (2016). Service provision in the framework of industry 4.0. Behavioral Science, 221, 372–377.

Reuter, T. (2016). Kuka industry 4.0 research, KUKA Aktiengesellschaft Zugspitzstraße 140, Augsburg, Vol. 1, pp. 1–50 (in German) .

Richert, A., Shehadeh, M., Plumanns, M, Groß, K., Schuster, K., & Jeschke, S. (2016). Educating engineers for industry 4.0: Virtual worlds and human–robot-teams empirical studies towards a new educational age. In Global engineering education conference (EDUCON ), 2016 IEEE, 10–13 April 2016, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Riedl, M., Zipper, H., Meier, M., & Diedric, C. (2014). Cyber-physical systems alter automation architectures. Annual Reviews in Control, 38, 123–133.

Riel, A., & Flatscher, M. (2017). A design process approach to strategic production planning for industry 4.0. In European conference on software process improvement (pp. 323–333).

Rihab, C., Ellouze, F., Koubaa, A., Qureshi, B., Preira, N., Youssef, H., et al. (2016). Cyber-physical systems clouds: A survey. Computer Networks, 108, 260–278.

Risso, N. A., Neyem, A., Benedetto, J., Carillo, M., Farias, A., Gajordo, M., et al. (2016). A cloud-based mobile system to improve respiratory therapy services at home. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 94, 467–479.

Rosas, J. C., Aguilar, J. A., Tripp-Barba, C., Espinosa, R., & Aguilar P. (2017). A mobile sensor fire prevention system based on the internet of things. In International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 274–283).

Rosendahl, R., Schmidt, N., Lüder, A., & Ryashentseva, D. (2016). Industry 4.0 value networks in legacy systems. In IEEE 20th conference on emerging technologies & factory automation (ETFA ) (pp. 1–4), 8–11 September 2015, Luxembourg.

RTI. (2014). https://www.slideshare.net/RealTimeInnovations/342488-io-t-influence . Available on August 30, 2017.

Ruivo, P., Johansson, B., Oliveira, T., & Netoa, M. (2013). Commercial ERP systems and user productivity: A study across European SMEs. Procedia Technology, 9 (2013), 84–93.

Ruivo, P., Mestrea, A., Johanssonb, B., & Oliveira, T. (2014). Defining the ERP and CRM integrative value. In Conference on enterprise information systems (CENTERIS) (Vol 16, pp. 704–709).

Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., & Neto, M. (2012). ERP post-adoption: Value impact on firm performance. In 7th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–6), 20–23 June 2012, Madrid, Spain.

Ruiz, A., Canovas, O., & Lopez-de-Teruel, P. (2013). A vision-enhanced multi-sensor LBS suitable for augmented reality applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 7 (3), 145–164.

Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., et al. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries . Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries.aspx . Available on December 28, 2017.

Sacala, I., & Moisescu, M. (2015). Cyber physical systems oriented robot development platform. Engineering Services, 65, 203–209.

Sachsenmeier, P. (2016). Industry 5.0—The relevance and implications of bionics and synthetic biology. Engineering, 2, 225–229.

Sadrzadehrafieia, S., Chofrehb, S., Hosseinia, N., & Sulaimana, R. (2013). The benefits of enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementation in dry food packaging industry. International Conference on Electronics Engineering and Informatics, 11, 220–226.

Safari, H., Faraji, Z., & Majidian, S. (2016). Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 475–486.

Sah, P. (2016). Saving environment using internet of things: Challenges and the possibilities. Advances in Internet of Things, 6, 55–64.

Saikrishna, P., & Pasumarthy, R. (2016). Multi-objective switching controller for cloud computing systems. Control Engineering Practice, 57, 72–83.

Samani, A., Ghenniva, H., & Wahaishi, A. (2015). Privacy in internet of things: A model and protection framework. Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 52, 606–613.

Samaniego, M., & Deters, R. (2016). Management and internet of things. Computer Science, 94, 137–143.

Sampaio, A. Z., & Rosário, D. (2012). Virtual reality technology applied on maintenance of painted walls of buildings. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 5, 297–303.

Sangmahachai, K. (2015). Kasetsart energy and technology management center. http://www.wise.co.th/wise/Knowledge_Bank/References/Everything_4/Revolution_to_Industry_4.pdf . Available on August 30, 2017.

Sangregorio, P., Cologni, A. L., Owen, F. C., & Previdi, F. (2015). Remote maintenance system for semi-automated manufacturing machines. In 2015 IEEE 1st international forum on research and technologies for society and industry leveraging a better tomorrow (RTSI) (pp. 457–461), 16–18 September 2015, Turin, Italy.

Santosa, A., Macedoa, J., Costaa, A., & Nicolau, M. (2014). Internet of things and smart objects for M-health monitoring and control. Procedia Technology, 16, 1351–1360.

Sasikala, B., Rajanarajana, M., & Geethavani, B. (2017). Internet of things: A survey on security issues analysis and countermeasures. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 6 (5), 21435–21442.

Scheer, S. (2013). Industry 4.0: Wie sehen Produktionsprozesse im Jahr 2020, e-book, published by AWS-Institute for Digitized Products and Processes, ISBN: 978-398-1583-328 (in Germany) .

Scheuermann, C., Verclas, S., & Bruegge, B. (2015). Agile factory—An example of an industry 4.0 manufacturing process, cyber-physical systems. In IEEE 3rd international conference on networks, and applications (CPSNA) (pp. 43–47), 19–21 August 2015, Hong Kong, China.

Schlick, J. (2014). Industry 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung. In T. Bauernhansl, M. ten Hompel, & B. Vogel-Heuser (Eds.), Industry 4. 0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (Vol. 4, pp. 57–84). Anwendung, Technologien und Migration (in German) .

Schouh, G., Gartzen, T., & Marks, A. (2015). Promoting work-based learning through industry 4.0. CIRP Conference on Learning Factorie, 32, 82–87.

Schuh, G., Pitscha, M., Rudolfa, S., Karmanna, W., & Sommera, M. (2014a). Modular sensor platform for service-oriented cyber-physical systems in the European tool making industry. Engineering Services, 17, 374–379.

Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R., & Prote, J. P. (2014b). Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the context of industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 19, 51–56.

Schuhmacher, J., & Hummel, V. (2016). Decentralized control of logistic processes in cyber-physical production systems at the example of ESB logistics learning factory. Procedia CIRP, 54, 19–24.

Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihna, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Reconfigurable and Virtual Production, 52, 161–166.

Schumann, A. (1999). Integrated production control for batch plants. European Control Conference . https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.1999.7100101 .

Schweer, D., & Sahl, J. C. (2017). The digital transformation of industry—The benefit for Germany. In The drivers of digital transformation (Vol. 10, pp. 23–31). Springer.

Sedera, D., & Gable, G. G. (2010). Knowledge management competence for enterprise system success. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19 (4), 296–306.

Seethamraju, R., & Sundar, D. (2013). Influence of ERP systems on business process agility. Management Review, 25 (3), 137–149.

Seitza, K., & Nyhuis, P. (2015). Cyber-physical production systems combined with logistic models—A learning factory concept for an improved production planning and control. In The 5th conference on learning factories (Vol. 32, pp. 92–97).

Sena, D., Ozturk, M., & Vayvay, O. (2016). An overview of big data for growth in SMEs. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 159–167.

Seok, H., & Nof, S. (2018). Intelligent information sharing among manufacturers in supply networks: Supplier selection case. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 1097–1113.

Shafiq, S. I., Sanin, C., Toro, C., & Szczerbicki, E. (2015). Virtual engineering object (VEO): Toward experience-based design and manufacturing for industry 4.0. Cybernetics and Systems, 46, 35–50.

Shah, M. (2016). Big data and the internet of things. In Big data analysis: New algorithms for a new society (pp. 207–237). Springer.

Shah, L. A., Etienne, A., Siadat, A., & Vernadat, F. (2016). Decision-making in the manufacturing environment using a value-risk graph. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 617–630.

Shahabi, C., Kashani, F., Khoshgozaran, A., Nocera, L., & Xing, S. (2010). GeoDec: A framework to effectively visualize and query geospatial data for decision-making. IEEE Multi Media, 10 (99), 1–11.

Shaikh, F. K., Zeadally, S., & Exposito, E. (2017). Enabling technologies for green internet of things. IEEE Systems Journal, 11 (2), 983–994.

Shallock, B., Rybski, C., Jochem, R., & Kohl, H. (2018). Learning factory for industry 4.0 to provide future skills beyond technical training. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 27–32.

Shamsuzzoha, A., Ferreira, F., Azevado, A., & Helo, P. (2016). Collaborative smart process monitoring within virtual factory environment: An implementation issue. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30 (1), 167–181.

Shaoshuai, F., Wenxiao, S., Nan, W., & Yan, W. (2011). MODM-based evaluation model of service quality in the internet of things. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11 (Part A), 63–69.

Shariatzadeh, N., Lundholma, T., Lindberga, L., & Sivarda, G. (2016). Integration of digital factory with smart factory based on Internet of Things. CIRP, 50 (2016), 512–517.

Sharma, A., & Gupta, S. (2014). Identifying the role of ERP in enhancing operational efficiency and supply chain mobility in aircraft manufacturing industry. In 2014 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT) (pp. 330–333), 7–8 February 2014, Ghaziabad, India.

Sharma, Y., Javadi, B., Si, W., & Sun, D. (2016). Reliability and energy efficiency in cloud computing systems: Survey and taxonomy. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 74, 66–85.

Sherbini, K., & Krawczyk, R. (2004). Overview of intelligent architecture. In 1st ASCAAD international conferencee - design in architecture KFUPM (pp. 137–152), December 2004, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Shi, Y., Lin, L., Zhou, C., Zhu, M., Xie, L., & Chai, G. (2017). A study of an assisting robot for mandible plastic surgery based on augmented reality. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 26 (1), 23–30.

Shrimali, R., Shah, H., & Chauhan, R. (2017). Proposed caching scheme for optimizing trade-off between freshness and energy consumption in name data networking based IoT. Advances in Internet of Things, 7, 11–24.

Shrouf, F., & Miragliotta, G. (2015). Energy management based on Internet of Things: Practices and framework for adoption in production management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 235–246.

Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014). Smart factories in industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the internet of things paradigm. In IEEE international conference onindustrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 697–701), 9–12 December 2014, Sunway, Malaysia.

Siddiqa, A., Hassem, A., Yaqoob, A., Marjani, M., Shamshirband, S., Gani, A., et al. (2016). A survey of big data management: Taxonomy and state of the art. IEEE Network, 29 (5), 6–9.

Silva, E., & Maló, P. (2014). IoT testbed business model. Advances in Internet of Things, 4, 37–45.

Singh, A., & Chatterjee, K. (2017). Cloud security issues and challenges: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 79, 88–115.

Sipsas, K., Alexopoulos, K., Xanthakis, V., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016). Collaborative maintenance in flow-line manufacturing environments: An Industry 4.0 approach. Research and Innovation for Future Production, 55, 236–241.

Smara, M., Aliouat, M., Pathan, A., & Aliout, Z. (2017). Acceptance test for fault detection in component-based cloud computing and systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 70, 74–93.

SmartFactoryKL. (2014). Keyfinder production line . http://smartfactory.dfki.uni-kl.de/en/content/demo/technological-demo/plant-industry4 . Available on August 28, 2017.

Smirnova, A., Kashevnika, A., & Ponomarev, A. (2015). Multi-level self-organization in cyber-physical-social systems: Smart home cleaning scenario. Manufacturing System, 30, 329–334.

SMLC. (2011). Implementing 21st century smart manufacturing . Workshop summary report, https://smartmanufacturingcoalition.org/sites/default/files/implementing_21st_century_smart_manufacturing_report_2011_0.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

SMT. (2017). http://www.asm-smt.com/en/asm-smt/smart-factory . Available on August 30, 2017.

Sogoti. (2014). Industry 4.0 report . https://www.fr.sogeti.com/globalassets/global/downloads/reports/vint-research-3-the-fourth-industrial-revolution . Available on August 22, 2017.

Song, T., Li, R., Mei, B., Yu, J., Xing, X., & Cheng, X. (2017). A privacy preserving communication protocol for IoT applications in smart homes. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4, 1844–1852.

Song, Z., & Niu, D. (2017). Focus on the current competitiveness of local coal industry in china. Resources Policy, 51, 172–182.

Sookhak, M., Gani, A., Khan, M., & Buyya, R. (2017). Dynamic remote data auditing for securing big data storage in cloud computing. Information Science, 380, 101–116.

SOPHIE. (2017). Industry 4.0 project . https://www.simplan.de/en/press/press-reports/562-pr15-research-project-sopie.html . Available on August 28, 2017.

Sotiriadis, S., & Bessis, N. (2017). An inter-cloud bridge system for heterogeneous cloud platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems, 54, 180–194.

Spath, D., Gerlach, S., Hämmerle, M., Schlund, S., & Strölin, T. (2013). Cyber - physical system for self - organised and flexible labour utilisation . https://blog.iao.fraunhofer.de/images/blog/paper-cps.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Spezzano, G., & Vinci, A. (2015). Pattern detection in cyber-physical systems. Engineering Services, 52, 1016–1021.

Steele, R., & Clarke, A. (2013). The internet of things and next-generation public health information systems, communications and network, robot in industry 4.0 environment. Procedia CIRP, 5, 4–9.

Stergiou, C., Psannis, K. E., Kim, B., & Gupta, B. (2018). Secure integration of IoT and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78 (3), 964–975.

Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536–541.

Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creaazza, A., & Noe, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research . https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1326643 .

Suh, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Developing ecological index for identify roles of ICT Industry in mobile ecosystems. Telematics İnformatics, 34 (1), 425.

Sun, C. (2012). Application of RFID technology for logistics on internet of things. Procedia Computer Science, 1, 106–111.

Sun, H., Ni, W., & Lam, R. (2015). A step-by-step performance assessment and improvement method for ERP implementation: Action case studies in Chinese companies. Computers in Industry, 68, 40–52.

Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., & Woelfflé, S. (2010). Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things, European Commision, 3, 34–36.

Tajiki, M., Akbari, B., & Mokari, N. (2017). Optimal Qos-aware network reconfiguration in software defined cloud data centers. Computer Networks, 120, 71–86.

Tamang, P., & Kumar, P. (2015). A DBMS based inventory model and its timeframe study in automobile spare parts import management. In 9th International conference on software, knowledge, information management and applications (SKIMA) (pp. 321–328), 15–17 December 2015, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Tang, H., Li, X., Guo, S., Liu, S., Lang, L., & Huang, L. (2017). An optimizing model to solve the nesting problem of rectangle pieces based on genetic algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1817–1826.

Tao, C., & Gao, J. (2017). On building a cloud based mobile testing infrastructure service system. Journal of Systems and Software, 124, 39–55.

Tarimoradi, M., Zarandi, M. H., Zaman, H., & Turksan, B. (2017). Evolutionary fuzzy intelligent system for multi-objective supply chain network designs: An agent-based optimization state of the art. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1551–1579.

Tavana, M., Mirzagoltabar, H., Mirhedayatian, S. M., Saen, R. F., & Azadi, M. (2013). A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66 (2), 501–513.

Tekez, E., & Taşdeviren, G. (2016). A model to assess leanness capability of enterprises. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 776–781.

Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 953–962.

Thames, L., & Schaefer, D. (2016). Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, 52, 12–17.

Theorin, A., Bengtsson, K., Provost, J., Lieder, M., Johnsson, C., Lundholm, T., et al. (2016). An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 1297–1311.

Thompsona, K., & Kadiyalab, R. (2016). Making water systems smarter using M2M technology. Computer Science, 89, 437–443.

Thuemmler, C., & Bai, C. (2017). Health 4.0: Application of industry 4.0 design principles in future asthma management. In Health 4.0: How virtualization and big data are revolutionizing healthcare (pp. 23–37).

Tong, L., Yancun, W., & Junjiaou, W. (2016). Capacity analysis of an iron foundry fettling-shop, using virtual manufacturing technology. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 16, 329–332.

Trieu, V. (2017). Getting value from business intelligence systems: A review and research agenda. Decision Support Systems, 93, 117–124.

Tripathy, A., & Tripathy, P. (2018). Fuzzy QoS requirement-aware dynamic service discovery andadaptation. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 136–146.

Tsai, C., Lin, W., & Ke, S. (2016). Big data mining with parallel computing: A comparison of distributed and MapReduce methodologies. The Journal of Systems and Software, 122, 83–92.

Tsai, W., Chu, P., Chang, T., Lee, H., & Huang, H. (2015). The impact of IT governance on performance of IFRS conversion under ERP systems. In 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 626–630), 6–9 December 2015, Singapore.

Tsai, W., Tsaur, T., Chou, T., Liu, T., & Hsu, J. (2009). Evaluating the information systems success of ERP implementation in Taiwan’s industries. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (pp. 1815–1819), 8–11 December 2009, Hong Kong, China.

Tuncel, C., & Polat, A. (2016). Sectoral system of innovation and sources of technological change in machinery industry: An investigation on Turkish machinery industry. Innovation and Business Management, 229, 214–225.

TUSIAD. (2016). Tusiad industry 4.0 in turkey as an imperative for global competitiveness an ermerging market perspective . http://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/download/7848_180faab86b5ec60d04ec929643ce6e45 . Available on August 28, 2017.

UK Government Office. (2016). Education report of IOT technology . https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/409774/14-1230-internet-of-things-review.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

UNITY. (2015). Industry 4.0 report . https://www.unity.de/fileadmin/Insights/OPPORTUNITY/OPPORTUNITY_Seize_OPPORTUNITY_Industrie_4.0.pdf . Available on August 28, 2017.

Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 299–315.

Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0—Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233–238.

Vallsa, M., Calva, C., Puenteb, J., & Alonsob, A. (2017). Adjusting middleware knobs to assess scalability limits of distributed cyber-physical systems. Computer Standards, 51, 95–103.

Vandaie, R. (2008). The role of organizational knowledge management in successful ERP implementation projects. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 920–926.

Verdouw, C., Wolfert, J., & Beulens, A. (2015). Virtualization of food supply chain with internet of things. Journal of Food Engineering, 176, 128–136.

Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (2013). Internet of things: Converging technologies for smart environments and integrated ecosystems . River Publisher http://www.internet-of-things-research.eu/pdf/Converging_Technologies_for_Smart_Environments_and_Integrated_Ecosystems_IERC_Book_Open_Access_2013.pdf . Available on November 28, 2017.

Villani, V., Pini, F., Leani, F., & Secchi, C. (2018). Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechatronics . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009 .

Vincent, H., Wells, L., Tarazaga, P., & Camelio, J. (2015). Trojan detection and side-channel analyses for cyber-security in cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 1, 77–85.

Virkki, J., & Chen, L. (2013). Personal perspectives: Individual privacy in the IOT. Advances in Internet of Things, 3, 21–26.

Viswanadham, N. (2002). The past, present, and future of supply-chain automation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 9, 48–56.

Vlacheas, P., Giaffreda, R., Stavroulaki, V., Kelaidonis, D., Foteinos, V., Poulios, G., et al. (2013). Enabling smart cities through a cognitive management framework for the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51, 102–111.

Vogel-Heuser, B., & Hess, D. (2016). Guest editorial: Industry 4.0–prerequisites and visions. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13, 411–413.

Vogel-Heuser, B., Rösch, S., Fischer, J., Simon, T., Ulewicz, S., & Folmer, J. (2016). Fault handling in PLC-based industry 4.0 automated production systems as a basis for restart and self-configuration and its evaluation. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 9, 1–43.

Wamba, S., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356–365.

Wan, J., Suo, H., Yan, H., & Liu, J. (2011). A general test platform for cyber-physical systems: Unmanned vehicle with wireless sensor network navigation. In 2011 International conference on advances in engineering, Procedia Engineering (Vol. 24, pp. 123–127).

Wang, F., & Chen, K. (2013). Virtual manufacturing to design a manufacturing technology for components made of a multiphase perfect material. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 40 (7), 837–846.

Wang, H., Xu, Z., & Witold, A. (2017a). An overview on the roles of fuzzy set techniques in big data processing: Trends, challenges and opportunities. Knowledge-Based Systems, 118, 15–30.

Wang, H., Yang, D., Qi, Yu., & Tao, Y. (2018b). Integrating modified cuckoo algorithm and creditability evaluation for QoS-aware service composition. Knowledge Based Systems, 140, 64–81.

Wang, S., Wan, S., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2015b). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: A self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, 101, 158–168.

Wang, S., Zhang, C., & Wan, J. (2016). A smart factory solution to hybrid production of multi-type products with reduced intelligence. In Information technology, networking, electronic and automation control conference, IEEE (pp. 848–853), 20–22 May 2016, Chongqing, China.

Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Huang, L., Xu, J., & Hsu, C. (2018c). QoS prediction for service recommendations in mobile edge computing. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.09.014 .

Wang, T., & Wen, Q. (2017). A key agreement protocol based-on object identifier for Internet of Things. Advanced in Control Engineering and Information Science, 15, 1787–1791.

Wang, X., & Chen, R. (2009). An experimental study on collaborative effectiveness of augmented reality potentials in urban design. Co-Design, 5 (4), 229–244.

Wang, X., Lv, J., Huang, M., Li, K., Li, J., & Ren, K. (2018a). Energy-efficient ICN routing mechanism with QoS support. Computer Networks, 131, 38–51.

Wang, X., Zhu, Y., Ha, Y., Qui, M., Huang, T., Si, X., et al. (2017b). An energy-efficient system on a programmable chip platform for cloud applications. Journal of Systems Architecture, 76, 117–132.

Wang, W., Tian, Y., Gong, X., Qi, Q., & Hu, Y. (2015a). Software defined autonomic QoS mode for future Internet. The Journal of Systems and Software, 110, 122–135.

Wanka, J. (2015). Industrie 4.0 — Innovationnen für die produktion von morgen . https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Industrie_4.0.pdf . Available on November 28, 2017 (in German).

Wardell, D., Mills, R., Peterson, G., & Oxley, M. (2016). A method for revealing and addressing security vulnerabilities in cyber-physical systems by modeling malicious agent interactions with formal verification. Engineering Services, 95, 24–31.

WEF. (2015). Deep shift technology tipping points and societal impact, world economic forum . Survey report. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf . Available on November 28, 2017.

Weiss, S., Dhurandhar, A., Baseman, R., White, B., Logan, R., Wislow, J., et al. (2016). Continuous prediction of manufacturing performance throughout the production lifecycle. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, 751–763.

Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards Industry 4.0—Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC Papers Online, 48 (3), 579–584.

Wille, E., Mellia, M., Leonardi, E., & Marsan, M. (2006). IP network design with end-to-end QoS constraints: The VPN Case. Computer Networks, 50, 1086–1110.

Wu, H., Yue, K., Li, B., Zhang, B., & Hsu, C. (2018). Collaborative QoS prediction with context-sensitive matrix factorization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 669–678.

Wua, W., Lib, W., Lawa, D., & Naa, W. (2015). Improving data center energy efficiency using a cyber-physical systems approach: Integration of building information modeling and wireless sensor networks. Engineering Services, 118, 1266–1273.

Xia, M., & Hea, Y. (2016). Functional connectomics from a “big data” perspective. Neuroimage, 7 (11), 1448–1454.

Xiaoyinga, S., & Huanyan, Q. (2011). Design of wetland monitoring system based on the internet of things. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10 (Part B), 1046–1051.

Xinga, Y., Malcolm, R., Hornera, W., El-Harama, M., & Bebbingtonb, J. (2009). A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development. Accounting Forum, 33 (3), 209–224.

Xu, Y., Fang, G., Na, Lv, Chen, S., & Zou, J. (2015). Computer vision technology for seam tracking in robotic GTAW and GMAW. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 32, 25–36.

Xu, Y., Jiang, R., Yan, S., & Xiong, D. (2011). The research of safety monitoring system applied in school bus based on the internet of thing. Procedia Engineering, 15, 2464–2468.

Yang, C., Liu, J., Chen, S., & Huang, K. (2016). Virtual machine management system based on the power saving algorithm in cloud. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 80, 165–180.

Yang, J., Wang, H., Lv, Z., Wei, W., Song, H., Kantarci, M., et al. (2017). Multimedia recommendation and transmission system based on cloud platform. Future Generation Computer Systems, 70, 94–103.

Yang, K., & Hirohide, Haga. (2015). Vocabulary game using augmented reality—Expressing elements in virtual world with objects in real world. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 25–30.

Yang, X., Malak, R., Lauer, C., Weidig, C., Hagen, H., Hamann, B., et al. (2013). Manufacturing system design with virtual factory tools. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28 (1), 25–40.

Yao, G., Ding, Y., Ren, L., Hao, K., & Lei, C. (2016). An immune system-inspired rescheduling algorithm for workflow in Cloud systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 99, 39–50.

Yaseen, M., Anjum, A., Rana, O., & Hill, R. (2017). Cloud-based scalable object detection and classification in video streams. Future Generation Computer Systems, 10 (99), 1–11.

Yeh, J. (2006). Evaluating ERP performance from user perspective. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Asia - Pacific conference on services computing (APSCC’06) (pp. 311–314), 12–15 December 2006, Guangdong, China.

Yu-fang, L., & Jin-xing, S. J. (2011). Using the internet of things technology constructing digital mine. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10 (Part B), 1104–1108.

Yun, J., Won, D., Jeong, E., Park, K., Yang, J., & Park, J. (2016). The relationship between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 142–155.

Yusof, M., Othman, M., Omar, Y., & Yusof, M. (2013). The study on the application of business intelligence in manufacturing: A review. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 10 (1), 317–324.

Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Shaharudin, M. R., & Kuan, E. E. L. (2017). Barriers to product returnmanagement in automotive manufacturing firms in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 22–40.

Zarte, M., & Pechmann, A. (2016). Building an Industry 4.0-compliant lab environment to demonstrate connectivity between shop floor and IT levels of an enterprise. In IECON 2016 — 42nd annual conference of the IEEE (pp. 6590–6595), 23–26 October 2016, Florence, Italy.

Zezulka, F., Marcon, P., Vesely, I., & Sajdl, O. (2016). Industry 4.0—An introduction in the phenomenon. IFAC, 49 (25), 8–12.

Zhai, L., & Zhang, S. (2009). The feature model of general ERP system for discrete manufacturing industry. In International conference on electronic commerce and business intelligence, 2009. ECBI 2009 (pp.12–15), 6–7 June 2009, Beijing, China.

Zhang, J., Ong, S., & Nee, A. (2010b). RFID-assisted assembly guidance system in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (13), 3919–3938.

Zhang, L., & Jiao, J. (2009). Modeling production configuration using nested colored object-oriented Petri-nets with changeable structures. Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 359–378.

Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Tao, F., Li, B. H., Ren, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2014). Cloud manufacturing: A new manufacturing paradigm. Enterprise Information Systems, 8, 167–187.

Zhang, P., Jin, H., He, Z., Leung, H., Song, W., & Jiang, Y. (2018). IgS-wBSRM: A time-aware Web Service QoS monitoring approach in dynamic environments. Information and Software Technology, 96, 14–26.

Zhang, X. (2016). The transformation and upgrading of the Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 18 (5), 97–105.

Zhang, Y., Jiang, P., Huang, G., Qu, T., Zhou, G., & Hong, J. (2010a). RFID-enabled real-time manufacturing information tracking infrastructure for extended enterprises. Intelligent Manufacturing, 23 (6), 2357–2366.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, Y., & Hu, D. (2017). Research on services encapsulation and virtualization access model of machine for cloud manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28, 1109–1123.

Zhao, L., Chien, C., & Gen, M. (2018). A bi-objective genetic algorithm for intelligent rehabilitation scheduling considering therapy precedence constraints. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 973–988.

Zheng, S. (2015). Research on mobile learning based on augmented reality. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 179–182.

Zhou, K., Fu, C., & Yang, S. (2016a). Big DATA driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights. Modelling Software, 56, 215–225.

Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L., (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th international conference fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2147–2152).

Zhou, L., Pan, S., Wang, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2016b). Machine learning on big data: Opportunities and challenges. Neurocomputing, 47, 563–569.

Zhou, W., Feng, D., Tan, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Improving big data storage performance in hybrid environment. Computer Science, 9, 40–50.

Zhu, S., & Dong, H. (2010). Researching on the implementation theory and methodology for the service industry ERP system. In 2010 International conference on electrical and control engineering (ICECE) (pp. 4764–4768), 25–27 June 2010, Wuhan, China.

Zujevs, A., Osadcuks, V., & Ahrendt, P. (2015). Trends in robotic sensor technologies for fruit harvesting: 2010–2015. Procedia Computer Science, 77, 227–233.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Industrial Engineering Department, Marmara University Engineering Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey

Ercan Oztemel & Samet Gursev

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ercan Oztemel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Oztemel, E., Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manuf 31 , 127–182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

Download citation

Received : 30 January 2018

Accepted : 28 June 2018

Published : 24 July 2018

Issue Date : January 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Industry 4.0
  • Smart factory
  • Internet of things (IoT)
  • Cyber-physical systems
  • Cloud systems
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) A Literature Review and Classification of Selected Software

    literature review on software industry

  2. (PDF) A simplified systematic literature review: Improving Software

    literature review on software industry

  3. (PDF) A Literature Review of Agile Practices and Their Effects in

    literature review on software industry

  4. A Literature Review on Agile Model Methodology in Software Development

    literature review on software industry

  5. (PDF) Systematic Literature Reviews of Software Process Improvement: A

    literature review on software industry

  6. (PDF) Multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

    literature review on software industry

VIDEO

  1. LITERATURE REVIEW HPEF7063 ACADEMIC WRITING FOR POSTGRADURATES

  2. The technology trends impact on software architecture- Managing Software Architecture

  3. For Literature Review and Reading| ጊዜዎን የሚቀጥብ ጠቃሚ AI Tool

  4. Software Ecosystems: A New Research Agenda

  5. Literature Review

  6. Introduction to Computer Software in Structural Analysis

COMMENTS

  1. Systematic literature review on software quality for AI-based software

    By following Kitchenham's guideline (Kitchenham and Charters 2007), we performed a systematic literature review to provide a holistic picture of the state of the art in quality for AI-based software.. Systematic literature studies can include reviews and synthesizing existing work in a manner that is fair for sustaining researchers in realizing the current state of a research field in ...

  2. The state of research on software engineering competencies: A

    2.2. Related literature review studies. Three literature review studies on SEC were found from the literature search. Cruz et al. (2015) used a systematic mapping study to plot the current landscape of published empirical and theoretical studies that explored the role of personality in software engineering. The authors reviewed 90 papers published from 1970 to 2010.

  3. Training software architects suiting software industry needs: A

    The literature review reveals various teaching strategies to align software architecture training courses with the needs of the software industry. These techniques can be classified into two categories: those used for training software architects and those used for teaching and learning methodologies.

  4. Best Practices for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

    In the software development industry, startup companies are addressing the need for innovative software products. However, such companies are affected by process maturity, funding, economic and political environments, and marketing, to name only a few factors. ... We conduct a systematic literature review following guidelines provided by ...

  5. Best Practices for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

    Best Practices for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review. November 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63329-5_3. Conference: International Conference on Software Process Improvement ...

  6. Software Analytics to Software Practice: A Systematic Literature Review

    A Systematic Literature Review Tamer Mohamed Abdellatif, Luiz Fernando Capretz, and Danny Ho Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Western University ... • Research was directly related to the software industry and stakeholders. • For duplicate publications of the same study, the newest and most complete one was selected. This is

  7. Software industry experiments: A systematic literature review

    Background: There is no specialized survey of experiments conducted in the software industry. Goal: Identify the major features of software industry experiments, such as time distribution, independent and dependent variables, subject types, design types and challenges. Method: Systematic literature review, taking the form of a scoping study. Results: We have identified 10 experiments and five ...

  8. Digital Twins in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review

    The literature review revealed 93 documents after data screening and cleaning 251 initial documents. Our main findings are that digital twins are already influencing and will significantly affect the software industry, revolutionizing various aspects of the software development lifecycle.

  9. Skills development for software engineers: Systematic literature review

    A Systematic Literature Review was performed on six databases, resulting in 56 selected articles identifying the soft skills and the teaching methodologies desired to train Software Engineers. ... Software Engineering is an industry-oriented discipline [24], which means that students must learn to deal not only with technical problems but also ...

  10. Lightweight Software Architecture Evaluation for Industry: A ...

    Processes for evaluating software architecture (SA) help to investigate problems and potential risks in SA. It is derived from many studies that proposed a plethora of systematic SA evaluation methods, while industrial practitioners currently refrain from applying them since they are heavyweight. Nowadays, heterogeneous software architectures are organized based on the new infrastructure ...

  11. A systematic literature review of literature reviews in software

    A tertiary review is a study of secondary studies (or, a systematic review of systematic reviews) [2]. Tertiary studies 'review the reviews' in a given area in order to provide an overview of the state of evidence in that area. The SE community as a whole believes that secondary and tertiary studies are useful, e.g., [2], [3], [4], [5].

  12. Software Industry Experiments: A Systematic Literature Review

    Method: Systematic literature review, taking the form of a scoping study. Results: We have identified 10 experiments and five quasi-experiments up to July 2012. Most were run as of 2003.

  13. Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review

    Moreover, perceived diversity aspects related to SE participants' race, age, and disability need to be further analyzed in Software Engineering research. From our systematic literature review, we conclude that researchers need to consider a wider set of perceived diversity aspects for future research. Keywords: Perceived diversity, Systematic ...

  14. Software as a Service Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review

    Abstract. Software as a Service (SaaS) as a type of Cloud computing is a type of computing that become a contentious topic among enterprise information technology (IT) professionals. In recent decades, rapid advances and breakthroughs in SaaS have enabled many businesses in numerous industries to consider it as a promising technology towards using.

  15. Software as a Service Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review

    Software as a Service (SaaS) as a type of Cloud computing is a type of computing that become a contentious topic among enterprise information technology (IT) professionals. In recent decades ...

  16. PDF Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature

    development, software testing, software maintenance, and software management. •We have summarised key challenges that using LLMs encounters within the SE field and have suggested several potential research directions for LLMs4SE. Section2presents our research questions (RQs) and elaborates on our systematic literature review (SLR) methodology.

  17. Software industry experiments: A systematic literature review

    Software Industry Experiments: A Systematic Literature Review Oscar Dieste Natalia Juristo Mauro Danilo Martínez Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Politécnica del Ejército Boadilla del Monte, Spain Boadilla del Monte, Spain Sangolquí, Ecuador [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] University of Oulu Oulu, Finland natalia ...

  18. PDF Software Compliance in Different Industries: A Systematic Literature Review

    Figure 2 summarizes the software compliance applications by industry. The analysis found that certain industries are investigated more than others. In the software industry itself, the review found 36% of the primary studies discuss compliance concerns in the software field. Then, the cloud industry comes with 22% of the studies, followed by the

  19. Exploring the intersection between software industry and Software

    1. Introduction. As in the last five decades, Software Engineering Education (SEE) continues to evolve, with the main focus being the preparation of Software Engineering (SE) students for future careers (Marques et al., 2014a, Almi et al., 2011).International organizations, such as the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (A. f ...

  20. PDF Successful Practices in Industry-Academy Collaboration in ...

    Successful Practices in Industry-Academy Collaboration in the Context of Software Agility: A Systematic Literature Review Denis de Gois Marques1(B), Tamara D. Dallegrave2, Cleyton Mario de Oliveira 1, and Wylliams Barbosa Santos 1 University of Pernambuco, POLI/UPE, Recife, Brazil {denis.marques,cleyton.rodrigues,wbs}@upe.br2 Polytechnic School of Pernambuco, POLI/UPE, Recife, Brazil

  21. Systematic Review and Literature Review Software by DistillerSR

    Get Started. The DistillerSR platform automates the conduct and management of literature reviews so you can deliver better research faster, more accurately and cost-effectively. DistillerSR's highly configurable, AI-enabled workflow streamlines the entire literature review lifecycle, allowing you to make more informed evidence-based health ...

  22. The consolidation of game software engineering: A systematic literature

    1. Introduction. In 2021, the video game industry generated total revenues of $180.3 billion (up 1.4% over 2020 [1]), and it keeps growing after having already surpassed the revenues of the movie and music industries combined in 2019 [2], this makes it the largest entertainment industry in terms of revenue.. Video games are advanced software products and, at the same time, they are complex ...

  23. Taking AI to the next level in manufacturing

    Manufacturers rightly view AI as integral to the creation of the hyper-automated intelligent factory. They see AI's utility in enhancing product and process innovation, reducing cycle time ...

  24. HR Software Pricing: 2024 Industry Overview

    Human resources (HR) software helps businesses manage employees and their data, assisting with tasks such as hiring, onboarding, time tracking, performance reviews and more. Most can also ...

  25. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies

    Based on the literature review, the authors provide a definition for Industry 4.0 which specifies six design principles that should be considered when applying Industry 4.0 solutions. The article is structured as the following. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the research process and method implemented in this study.

  26. Artificial intelligence for production, operations and logistics

    Subsequently, this paper presents literature reviews and outlines future directions for each component, specifically AI in the context of production management, operations management, and logistics management within the modular construction industry. The review provides a valuable knowledge base and roadmap to guide future research and ...