human development and economic sustainability css essay

Human Development and Economic Sustainability

August 20, 2023
Daily Write-Ups , Featured
41147 Views

The following article is written by Sidra Nawaz a student of Sir Syed Kazim Ali . Moreover, the article is written on the same pattern, taught by Sir to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. Sir Kazim has uploaded his students’ solved past paper questions so other thousands of aspirants can understand how to crack a topic or question, how to write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.

Introduction

Human development ensures a country’s citizens’ well-being, fueling economic progress. A healthy and educated society fosters a growth culture, efficiently participates in achieving development goals, and supports economic activities while ensuring that they do not compromise the environment, social equity, or future generations’ ability to meet their needs. Modern nation-states like South Korea, Singapore, and Finland have proved that by creating employment opportunities, promoting a skills-based economy, embracing entrepreneurial culture, and getting acquainted with technological advancements, human development boosts long-term progress and prosperity and provides a firm ground for a country’s economic sustainability.

An overview of the terms: ‘Human Development and Economic Sustainability’, and their Connection

Moving towards the understanding of the terms, human development is a broad concept encompassing the citizen’s overall quality of life, warranting access to public resources and meeting basic human needs. Delving deep into its concept, the United Nations Development Agency (UNDP), an international development forum, devised a Human Development Index (HDI) in 1990 to gauge the extent of human development in a country. HDI is an all-inclusive measurement index that scales development performance and involves a new approach to development efforts. The foundation of HDI is built on the three crucial elements of a society’s progress: longevity, knowledge, and the standard of living. On the other hand, economic sustainability refers to the activities that portray long-term development while considering the perspective of being environment-friendly and enabling future generations to meet their own needs. It is backed by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), an initiative by the United Nations (UN) to address sustainable development challenges by practicing the conservation of natural and financial resources to create long-term financial stability. Conclusively, a healthy and educated population builds the foundation of sustainable projects, boosting long-term progress and prosperity. Thus, human development is a prerequisite for economic sustainability for a country.

How does human development lead a country towards economic sustainability?

The enhancement of employment opportunities

One of the critical dimensions endorsed by human development is promoting knowledge through schools, colleges, universities, technical and vocational training institutes, etc. It creates a prominent effect on people’s overall improved capabilities, provision of better learning opportunities, and generates a skill-based workforce able to cope with technological advancements, thus enhancing employment prospects. In addition, it helps eliminate poverty and unemployment, the challenges primarily faced by developing and under-developed countries. As per the World Bank report of 2019, “Singapore has significantly reduced unemployment through its knowledge-based economy.” Thus, human development fosters economic sustainability by generating multiple employment opportunities.

The focus on skilled Labour promoting economic growth

In the same way, educated individuals who are more capable and trained play a vital role in facilitating a better economy by promoting high-valued industries and introducing cost saving measures. Investing in human capital helps a country maintain a stable workforce, generate considerable revenue, and condense socio-economic disparities. To demonstrate the fact, the case of South Korea can be taken as an example, which was once a war-torn country with limited resources, dependent upon foreign aid, having a per capita income of 70 USD. By rightly investing in human capital and technical education and promoting its labor-intensive industry, the country successfully executed the IMF exit plan and, after taking a remarkable journey, emerged as one of the most developed economies, raised its per capita income to approximately 32000 USD, and eventually became a member of OECD and G-20, a clear indication of its enormous economic growth.

The emphasis on productive workforce supporting the national economy

Moreover, if the fundamental needs of people are fulfilled, indicated by higher values of HDI, they would be able to render their energies more creatively. Furthermore, they would have ample time to focus on more critical tasks and exercise the freedom to adopt an occupation that makes them feel more accomplished. On the other hand, low human development limits the options and opportunities for living tolerable life. The case of Germany is the same, where a healthier and better lifestyle promotes waves of opportunities and high productivity levels. The country’s emphasis on human development and removing the constraints, which may have been caused otherwise, has contributed to it hosting a solid manufacturing sector, providing a breeding ground for advanced technology, and producing noteworthy export-quality products; all these factors collectively support its national economy.

The investment in human development returned via exports

Similarly, investment in human development enables a country to compete in the global market. Educational excellence and mental health enhance innovation and creativity among its citizens, thus promoting a culture of research and development. The mushrooming of new startups leads to new products, generating fruitful results that positively impact the national economy. To illustrate this fact, the situation of Finland can be analyzed, where the skilled and healthy population proved to be an essential asset, and companies like Nokia emerged that took the international markets and set the bar so high for other telecom companies, boosting the exports and resulting in the economic success on a global level.

Human development: a factor that attracts FDIs

Likewise, human development in a country is an indicator of its educated workforce, effective governance system, and low criminal activity. Since foreign investors tend to make decisions based on the risk factor of the project and the expected return on their investment, a safe environment and competent workforce ensure ingenious management of the country’s resources and safeguard the assets. For instance, the human development initiatives taken by the Singaporean government, like the availability of skilled personnel, innovation opportunities, and sustainable culture, have created a compelling environment for foreign investors. This proves that stockholders are more interested in investing in a country with a good HDI, expanding opportunities for free trade Agreements (FTAs), thus bolstering the state’s economy.

The promotion of entrepreneurship culture to overcome issues, leading to economic sustainability

Adding more to it, a population enjoying better access to resources encourages their children to seek higher education, leading to a generation of educated youth. It creates room for creativity and innovation, consequently fostering the spirit of entrepreneurship and igniting new startups. The overarching yield of entrepreneurs comes up with unique solutions to national and international sustainability problems, like the production of renewable energy, digitalization of currency, etc. A healthy business environment also helps talent retention and overcomes domestic issues like brain drain. Moreover, the educated population creates immense pressure for improved governance, helps combat social evils like corruption, promotes sustainable business policies, and positively impacts economic sustainability.

The technological advancements providing access to global markets

Lastly, when a country prioritizes its human development and invests in innovation hubs and research centers, the dream of economic sustainability is materialized in the shape of technological advancements. Such nations can easily catch up with other countries and lead towards multiple opportunities for international collaborations and trade agreements with other countries, exchange of resources, and provide access to markets across the globe, which enhances their economic resilience. Likewise, China has proved its mettle through aggressive development in its technological sector, thus propelling its economic growth and enabling it to become a significant player in the global marketplace.

In a nutshell, a country’s investment in human development by capitalizing on public education, healthcare, quality of life, and overall well-being undeniably establishes a strong foundation for balanced and sustainable growth over the long term.

CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them. CSS Solved Essays

PMS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

Looking for the last years’ solved PMS essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the PMS Solved Essays to start reading them. PMS Solved Essays

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Want-to-Write-Argumentatively-the-Way-They-are-Writing.png

CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers

Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Miss Iqra Ali & Dr Nishat Baloch , Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students. General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers

Articles Might Interest You!

The following are some of the most important articles for CSS and PMS aspirants. Click on any to start reading.

Top Categories

Cssprepforum, education company.

cssprepforum.com

Welcome to Cssprepforum, Pakistan’s largest learning management system (LMS) with millions of questions along with their logical explanations educating millions of learners, students, aspirants, teachers, professors, and parents preparing for a successful future.

Founder: Syed Kazim Ali Founded: 2020 Phone: +92-332-6105-842 +92-300-6322-446 Email: [email protected] Students Served: 10 Million Daily Learners: 50,000 Offered Courses: Visit Courses

More Courses

Basic English Grammar and Writing Course

Extensive English Essay & Precis Course for CSS and PMS

CSS English Essay and Precis Crash Course for 2023

Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox.

CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved GSA
CSS Solved PA
CSS Solved Islamiat
Current Affairs
All Courses
Writers Club
All Authors
All Members
All Teachers
Become an Author
Who is Sir Syed Kazim Ali?
Privacy Policy

CssPrepForum is Pakistan’s largest and greatest platform for CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, SPSC, KPPSC, AJKPSC, BPSC, GBPSC, NTS, and other One Paper 100 Marks MCQs exams’ students. It has become Pakistan’s most trusted website among CSS, PMS students for their exams’ preparation because of its high-quality preparation material.

@ 2023 Cssprepforum. All RightsReserved.

Human Development And Economic Sustainability CSS Essay

Human development and economic sustainability CSS Essay. Essay on human development and economic sustainability.

Introduction

Today the world has become highly interdependent like never before. In today’s world, a small skirmish between two states like Russia and Ukraine may have consequential effects for the economies of many developing states like Pakistan. In such unpredictable world, maintaining economic sustainability is a challenging task for many states which can be achieved primarily by means of human development.

Globalization Of Markets CSS Essay

Human Development

Primarily focuses on improving people lives rather than economic growth
Availability of opportunities, for example, educating a girl would build her skills, but it is of little use if she is denied access to jobs, or does not have the skills for the local labour market.
A multi-dimensional process.
Three foundations for human development are to live a healthy and creative life, to be knowledgeable, and to have access to resources needed for a decent standard of living.
Other dimension includes the creation of right conditions for human development like participation in political and community life, environmental sustainability, human security and rights and equality between men and women.

MCQs Quiz Online Test

Economic Sustainability

Economic sustainability refers to practices that support long-term economic growth without negatively impacting social, environmental, and cultural aspects of the community.

Human development helps in economic sustainability in the following ways.

Opportunities for small to medium entrepreneurs
Development of new markets
Overcome brain drain
Inventions and development
Investment in private sector

Religious Extremism And Intolerance

Checkered Democratic History Of Pakistan – CSS Essay

Global Power Dynamics and Pakistan’s Foreign Policy

About the author.

Askedon helps aspirants in their preparation for CSS, PMS, PCS and one paper MCQs based tests. We have syllabus wise complete notes of Current Affairs, Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, Essay, Gender Studies and many other compulsory and optional subjects of CSS, PMS and PCS. The blog is owned and managed primarily by Ataulhaq Yusufzai. For more details please visit About US and Privacy Policy page.

Can I get full essay on human development and economic sustainability?

We have given a detail outline of the essay, which we believe is enough for writing the essay. To complete the essay, please write at least three to four sentences on every bullet-point given in the essay outline. You can add some more bullet points to the outline too.

Analysis of the impact of success on three dimensions of sustainability in 173 countries

A. Kaklauskas 1 &
L. Kaklauskiene 1

Scientific Reports volume 12 , Article number: 14719 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

3651 Accesses

10 Citations

Metrics details

Climate-change impacts
Climate-change policy
Ecological modelling
Environmental impact
Socioeconomic scenarios
Sustainability

The United Nations have announced 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets, which are indivisible and integrated, and which balance the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. This indicates that the performance of successful nations is generally good across many sustainability indicators. Our results, based on multi-criteria and statistical analysis across 173 countries, suggest an interconnection between a country’s sustainability 12 indicators and success. This article focuses on the Country Success and Sustainability (CSS) Maps and Models of the World, which show that improvements in environmental, social, and economic sustainability indicators lead to improvements in the country's success, and vice versa. The CSS Models explain 98.2% of national success and 80.8% of the three dimensions of average sustainability dispersions. When a nation’s success increases by 1%, the 12 indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability improve by 0.85% on average. The human development index and GDP per capita were the success variables with the most substantial impact on 12 sustainability indicators in 173 countries. Calculations made using equal and different weights of 17 criteria show a deviation of 5.34% for the priorities of these 173 countries.

Global effects of progress towards Sustainable Development Goals on subjective well-being

Jianqing Du, Yali Liu, … Bojie Fu

Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals

Frank Biermann, Thomas Hickmann, … Birka Wicke

Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time

Zhenci Xu, Sophia N. Chau, … Jianguo Liu

Introduction

The United Nations have set a goal to achieve sustainable economic, social, and environmental development. The actions to achieve this goal should be balanced and integrated. In sustainable development, preserving the planet, combating inequality within and among countries, eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, fostering social inclusion, and creating continuous, sustainable, and inclusive economic growth are all interdependent aspects linked to each other 1 . Highlighting key results describing the effects of climate on migration, demographics, economics, agriculture, ineguality, health, disasters, and conflict, various researchers 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 suggest that climate is an important aspect that has influenced the many global challenges and even the historical evolution of the global economy. Moreover, poor air quality can contribute to shorter lifespans 6 . Globally, outdoor air pollution causes 3.3 million premature deaths per year, according to the 2010 data on the global burden of disease 7 .

Ridley et al. 8 have indicated a bidirectional causal relationship between poverty and mental illness, and have attempted to determine what mechanisms are at work when poverty triggers mental illness, as well as how mental illness leads to even deeper poverty. Research suggests that stress can contribute to faster aging. It has also been linked with the spread of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses in individuals exposed to stress over long periods of time. Physiological responses can start at an early age 9 .

All elements tend to move together in the modern world: economic institutions, political institutions, human capital, prosperity, and numerous others 10 . Chang and Lee 11 have examined panel data for 23 OECD countries for the period between 1970 and 2006 in order to re-appraise the way economic growth, the overall globalization index—including its three main dimensions (political, social, and economic integrations)—move together, and are linked by causal relationships. Stiglitz 12 points out that generally, higher per capita incomes are accompanied by higher national social indicators. A long‐term relationship between democratic politics, national sovereignty, and economic integration, as proposed in the political globalization trilemma, is supported by econometric evidence 13 .

Materialistic lifestyles and values have been associated with adverse effects on human health, as well as on that of our planet. Therefore, activities and lifestyles should be identified that promote human well-being, at the same time as protecting ecological security 14 . The authors of the current study identify optimal activities (arts and crafts, reading, sports, and meditating) as producing high levels of human well-being with low environmental costs.

This research investigates interrelationships between 17 success and 12 sustainability indicators of 173 countries. Investigations of links between success and sustainability indicators from different countries have been performed, and some systemic reviews describing such studies were also available (Supplementary sections 1 , 4 , and 5 ). However, our search did not return any studies that attempted to outline the impact of country success by examining the entire system of sustainability indicators. Our research, for instance, has shown that the 17 indicators of success and the 12 indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability are very closely interrelated, making up a single space, and all have to be analyzed in an integrated manner.

Successful forecasts of success and sustainability indicators are possible, as indicated by the studies performed by these authors and other researchers because specific social, economic, political, and environmental indicators usually correlate with each other. Both CSS Maps and Models developed by this research can assist with identifying policy recommendations on ways to improve the micro, meso, and macro environment. The CSS Models can be an alternative response strategy, while providing valuable input for new or revised national health and environmental policies in order to improve country success and sustainability.

This research is a quantitative study to assess the impact of national success on three dimensions of 12 sustainability indicators in 173 countries in 2020, or for the latest data available.

Our CSS Maps and Models are important investigation methods which facilitate the study of interdependence between country success and sustainability. We have performed literature analysis, presented in Supplementary sections 1 , 4 , and 5 , to better investigate the relationship 5 , 8 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 between our CSS Maps and Models and their components in the worldwide research context.

This research validated the two hypotheses put forward by this study:

Hypothesis 1—The increasing success of a country is generally accompanied by increasing values for the three dimensions of sustainability indicators, and declines in these indicators lead to decreases in the country's success. Improving some sustainability indicators tends to improve other sustainability indicators.

Hypothesis 2—Changes in the number of countries and their traditional key indicator systems and weights do not make a very significant difference to the relative national sustainability and success values. Likewise, the boundaries of the seven country clusters discussed in this research do not excessively depend on specific traditional key systems of indicators used in their analysis.

Initially, we determined if significant correlations were present. A practical comparison was performed for this purpose between the three dimensions of sustainability and countries’ success, using the CSS Maps, and the 2020 Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map of the World (the survival versus self-expression values and the traditional versus secular–rational values) 21 . We analyze the seven sustainability indicators’ vertical y-axes dimensions and the two success and priority horizontal x-axes dimensions (9 CSS Maps’ dimensions). The median correlation between the 9 CSS Map dimensions (the x and y axes) and the survival versus self-expression values are moderate, and the median correlation between the 9 CSS Map dimensions and the traditional versus secular–rational values is strong (Fig. 1 ). The Shapiro–Wilk Test revealed that the distribution of the values of all variables did not follow the normal law of distribution (p < 0.01). The correlations among the variables were assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient, and the results are presented in Supplementary Table S3 . The correlation analysis determined moderate, high, and very high correlations (p < 0.01) between most selected variables. Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S3 show the moderate overall median of all correlation coefficients between the 33 indicators (17 country success, 12 sustainability, estimated country success and its priority, the 2020 Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map of the World survival versus self-expression values [x-axis], and the traditional versus secular-rational values [y-axis]). The same figure and table present the moderate and strong correlations median between the nine CSS Map dimensions (the x-axis and y-axis) and the survival versus self-expression values and the traditional versus secular–rational values. Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S4 show the strong median correlation between the 173 countries. This indicates a close interrelation between the variables; therefore one can be exchanged for the other. Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 confirm that the eight-country clusters used in the Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map of the World can also be applied in the CSS Maps to indicate country success and the three dimensions of sustainability. The correlation between the dimensions characterizing the selected countries from the CSS Models (Supplementary section 3 ) being analyzed makes this possible.

Distribution of correlation coefficients on the CSS Map.

This research analyzed the dispersions of the values of the given variables and the interdependencies between the variables. We used a multiple linear regression model to measure the way the selected 17 country success criteria influence the independent sustainability variable dispersion. The multiple linear regressions were completed with the help of IBM SPSS V.26 to develop 12 regression models dealing with national success and sustainability. These relationships, determined by the research, correspond to various research findings 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 from around the world. These models can have significant consequences and implications for legislators, policymakers, communities, and businesses.

The CSS Maps offer an easy way to visualize the interrelationships between the success and 12 sustainability indicators of 173 countries for the given period, while the CSS Models enable statistical analysis of these relationships from multiple perspectives, as well as forecasts based on country success and sustainability indicators. This means that the CSS Models offer a more granular analysis of the research object, by means of statistical and multiple criteria analysis methods, whereas the maps focus more on the visual presentation of the results. Over time, the pool of appropriate available data is growing, as is the body of knowledge offered by studies performed in various countries. Therefore, the CSS Models are continuously improved, reflect the real picture in an ever better way, and can be an efficient tool for political decisions. Although the CSS Maps are very helpful at the start of analysis as a quick visualization of the interrelationships between the current status of country success and 12 sustainability indicators, they are static, and offer only limited possibilities for improvement. The CSS Maps can also be analyzed using statistical and multiple criteria analysis. Yet, this analysis will not be as comprehensive as the one offered by the CSS Models because the number of analysis criteria will be considerably smaller. The CSS Maps are integrated with the CSS Models to make sure the map and interdependencies can change over time. This enables the real-time use of the available global practice, a simplified and detailed country success and sustainability indicator interdependence system.

One directional 27 , 28 , 29 and bidirectional 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 causal relationships between indicators related to country success and sustainability have been examined in various studies around the world. The Country Success and Sustainability (CSS) Maps of the World that have developed as part of this study are described below.

Twelve CSS Models were developed to confirm the first hypothesis. Tables S5-S8 show the descriptive statistics of 12 CSS Models (Supplementary section 3 ). These Models, which are formal representations of the CSS Maps, show that when a country’s success increases by 1%, its 12 indicators related to the three dimensions of sustainability improve by 0.85% on average (Supplementary Table S8 ). Furthermore, Figs. 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 show that an increase in a country’s success is accompanied by an improvement in its indicators related to the three dimensions of sustainability, thus visually confirming the first hypothesis. These figures clearly show that the three dimensions of sustainability improve and the specific country’s success grows in parallel.

Country success and environment sustainability world maps: ( a ) CSS EPI map. ( b ) CSS air quality map. ( c ) CSS climate change map.

Country success and social sustainability world maps: ( a ) CSS life expectancy at birth map. ( b ) CSS happiness index map. ( c ) CSS positive peace index map.

CSS gross national income per capita map.

Environmental health and positive peace map.

On average, 80.8% of the dispersions for the indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability are explained by our CSS Models, while for national success the same indicator equals 98.2% (Supplementary Table S8 ). The median correlation of all 33 traditional indicators included in the analysis and applied to 173 countries is moderate (Supplementary Table S3 ). Supplementary Table S4 shows the correlation coefficient matrix of the 17 success criteria for each of the 173 countries analyzed in this study. Figure 1 shows the strong median correlation between the 173 countries. Thus, the count of included countries, or changes in their systems of traditional key indicators, have little impact on the comparative values of country sustainability and success. Furthermore, the choice of traditional key indicators and their system does not greatly affect the country groupings within the seven country clusters analyzed in this research. The second hypothesis has been substantiated by the analysis results related to the CSS Models, as well as the correlations identified between the 173 countries and 33 indicators (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 , Fig. 1 ). Figures 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 that show the specific country groupings within the seven clusters discussed in this paper also offer a clear, visual validation of the first hypothesis.

The CSS Maps of the World developed as part of this study visualize two dimensions. One dimension is success (x-axis), and the other is the three pillars of sustainability (y-axis). All the above indicators, their values, and significance are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 . The indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability analyzed in this research and represented along the y-axis include environmental (environmental performance index, ecological footprint, environmental health, air quality, PM 2.5 exposure, climate change), social (healthy life expectancy, life expectancy at birth, death rates from air pollution, happiness index, positive peace index), and economic (the gross national income per capita) sustainability indicators. The countries in the CSS Maps are grouped using the same eight clusters (Catholic Europe, Orthodox Europe, Protestant Europe, Confucian, West and South Asia, African-Islamic, English-speaking, and Latin America) as those used in the Inglehart–Welzel 2020 Cultural Map of the World 21 . The English-speaking and Protestant European clusters were combined into a single cluster due to their religious affinity, their shared and related history, similar development levels, and cultural interactions. The similarities between the Protestant European and English-speaking clusters have been noted in many studies 34 . The Inglehart–Welzel 2020 Cultural Map of the World covers many economic, institutional, psychological, and technological variables with strong discernible correlations among them 35 . The CSS Maps’ indicators of national success can be defined as a large pool of variables within the system of criteria such as political, environmental, macroeconomic, values-based, human developmental and well-being, and quality of life. This study compares 173 countries included in the CSS Maps and Models with the 99–103 countries in the Inglehart–Welzel 2020 Cultural Map of the World, in order to draw statistical parallels.

Our research (Supplementary Sections 1 , 4 , and 5 ) analyzes conceptually the following three dimensions of sustainable national development (with the research findings compared with similar studies from around the world) quantitatively (CSS Models) and visually (CSS maps). Our CSS Maps are based on several distinctive traditional indicators (marked in italics ) from each indicator group of the three dimensions of sustainability (y-axis) as they relate to country success (x-axis):

Environmental sustainability indicators (Fig. 2 ): environmental performance index (EPI) (2020) ; ecological footprint per capita (2018); environmental health (2020); air quality (2020) ; PM 2.5 exposure (2020); climate change (2020).

Social sustainability indicators (Fig. 3 ): life expectancy at birth, total (2019) ; healthy life expectancy (2019); death rates from air pollution (2019); happiness index (2020); positive peace index (PPI) (2020).

Economic sustainability indicator (Fig. 4 ): the gross national income per capita (2020).

The Country Success and Environment Sustainability World Maps visually demonstrate the association between country success (x-axis) and environmental sustainability (y-axis) for 99 countries (Fig. 2 ). Country success strongly and positively correlates with six environmental sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S3 ). The CSS Map Environmental Sustainability Models explain 76.3% on average of the dispersions among the environmental sustainability indicators. An increase of 1% in a country’s success is accompanied by an increase of 0.84% on average in its environmental sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S8 ).

The Country Success and Social Sustainability World Maps graphically show the relationship between the priority of country success (x-axis) and social sustainability (y-axis) for 102–103 countries (Fig. 3 ). Country success indicators strongly correlate with five social sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S3 ). The CSS Map Social Sustainability Models explain on average 83.4% of the dispersions among the social sustainability indicators. An increase of 1% in a country’s success is accompanied by an improvement of 0.39% on absolute average in its social sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S8 ).

The CSS Gross National Income Per Capita Map visually depicts the association between country success (x-axis) and economic sustainability—the gross national income per capita (y-axis) for 102 countries (Fig. 4 ). The CSS map plot shows that as the country’s success increases, the gross national income per capita rises (r 1 26 = 0.930; p < 0.01) (Supplementary Table S3 ). The CSS Gross National Income per Capita Model explains 94.5% of the income indicator dispersions. When a country’s success increases by 1%, its income indicator increases by 3.309% (Supplementary Table S8 ).

Based on multiple criteria and statistical analysis across 173 countries, our results suggest an interconnection between a country’s 12 sustainability criteria. For example, the Environmental Health and Positive Peace Map visually demonstrate the association between country positive peace (x-axis) and environmental health (y-axis) for 150 countries (Fig. 5 ).

Multi-variant design and multiple criteria analysis of national policy alternatives are performed, and rational decisions are identified in stage 10. Rational country success and sustainability can be ensured by analyzing multiple alternatives and their detailed indicators, taking into account the existing state of the micro, meso, and macro environment. Several worldwide best practice examples 14 , 36 , 37 , 38 of ways to identify rational activities, policy, and strategy are briefly analyzed in Supplementary Sections 1 , 4 , and 5 .

Discussion and conclusions

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights Sustainable Development Goals and the interlinked, integrated, and balanced environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainable development. The idea that national indicators of success and environmental, social, and economic sustainability move in tandem 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 has been debated for decades. This phenomenon reflects one of the big picture trends of our modern world. The focus of our article is the Country Success and Sustainability (CSS) Maps and Models of the World, which show how the indicators of the three dimensions of sustainable development improve as a country becomes more successful, and declines in these indicators lead to decreases in the country’s success. Similar findings presented in a wide range of studies highlight the need to continuously improve the three dimensions of sustainability (Supplementary Sections 1 , 4 and 5 ).

Figure 1 shows the moderate and strong overall median of all correlation coefficients between the 173 countries and 33 indicators. The same figure presents the moderate and strong correlations median between the nine CSS Map dimensions (the x-axis and y-axis), and the survival versus self-expression values and the traditional versus secular–rational values.

According to the CSS Models, whenever there is a 1% increase in a country’s success, this is accompanied by an improvement of on average 0.85% in its 12 indicators related to the three dimensions of sustainability. Meanwhile all 17 of the country success variables used in the CSS Models explain 98.2% of the dispersion of the country success variable and 80.8% on average of the dispersion of the three dimensions of sustainability (Supplementary Table S8 ).

The seven cultural clusters reflect the stable national success and sustainability similarities because similar cultures tend to move together in basically the same cultural, success, and sustainability direction. Higher success indicators are accompanied by higher sustainability indicators, which is also shown by the strong correlations obtained in our study (Supplementary Tables S1 – S3 ). Some country’s success and sustainability indicators are cointegrated, moving together, and therefore cannot be changed in isolation. Sobel and Coyne 44 and Coyne and Sobel 45 confirmed these findings.

The human development index (β av5 = 0.506), GDP per capita (β av1 = 0.399), GDP per capita in PPP (β av2 = 0.251), and the corruption perceptions index (β av4 = 0.148) were the success variables with the strongest impact on 12 sustainability indicators given an increase of one unit in the independent variable. Human development index (HDI) has the highest values of standardized coefficients’ beta and effect size in eight CSS Models out of 12. For example, Model 3 indicates that HDI has a positive relationship (β 5 = 0.719) with the dependent variable (environmental health) and is statistically significant at α = p < 0.001 (Supplementary Table S7 ). The HDI reaches a high correlation of 89.9%, (Supplementary Table S3 ) confirming that HDI and environmental health are highly and positively correlated. In second place in CSS Models, economic indicators have the most significant standardized coefficients beta and effect size values (Supplementary Table S7 ). Economic factors have been shown to make the biggest impact on this dispersion. This is hardly surprising, given that a number of studies indicate a sizeable continuum of influence attributable to GDP.

Model 3 has the explanatory power of 91.5% for environmental health, while Model 4 explains 83.4% of the air quality dispersion (Supplementary Table S8 ). Independent variables, such as the human development index (β 54 = 0.586) and GDP per capita (β 14 = 0.548), make a significant impact on air quality (Model 4), a dependent variable, for the 173 countries in question (Supplementary Table S7 ). The influence of the remaining independent variables on this variable is present but much lower. Meanwhile, the entire pool of variables used in the CSS Models explains 53.5–97.7% of the dispersion (Supplementary Table S8 ). The study revealed that we could use CSS Models and the INVAR method 46 (Supplementary Section 2 and Fig. S1 ) in an integrated manner for sustainability policy strategies development and analysis. The CSS Models show that relationships exist between 12 sustainability and 17 success parameters for the 173 countries, and that they are statistically significant. This means that 12 sustainability parameters depend on 17 indicators of the country's success, and that they can be used for the prediction of sustainability in 12 parameters. For example, in order to improve a country’s sustainability indicators, it is expedient for it to aim for a higher human development index. As this human development index includes income, education, and life expectancy indices, these indicators must be improved, and as a result, the country's sustainability indicators will improve.

The multiple criteria analysis, statistical calculations, and CSS Maps and Models have been used to derive practical conclusions and recommendations, including the finding that the growing success of a country also means higher sustainability indicators. This research sheds more light on the way a country’s response to the sustainability challenges depends on its existing success indicators and macro level context. Specific policies, therefore, should be set based on this information. Some countries, however, fail to do this in a systematic manner. Another important point is that some areas remain underexplored, including the endorsement of human development, a stronger assurance of gender equality, the reduction or elimination of corruption, and the improvement of social progress, education, and happiness.

Most countries need immediate action and systemic policies to ensure more effective control and to improve sustainability with the best global practices in mind. Countries aiming to improve their success effectively can use these research findings as practical guidelines and a scorecard leading toward a sustainable future.

Practical applications and implications

The decision matrix shown in Supplementary Table S9 can help determine the most effective ways to improve the sustainability indicators. This is done by analysing 12 CSS Models and their 17 dependent variables. Hence, this decision matrix comprises twelve equivalent segments, one segment for one specific CSS Model to be analysed. We need to establish the cumulative effect size (Q j , P j , N j ) of the 17 country success indicators on attempts to improve 12 sustainability indicators at once. The first segment describes the CSS Environmental Performance Index Model, the first of the models, and the last segment (Segment 12) describes the CSS Positive Peace Index Model. All alternatives are assessed against eight criteria: (1) Pearson’s correlation coefficient (the absolute value |r| of this coefficient is considered), (2) the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), (3) the standardized beta coefficient (β), (4) standard deviation, (5) p values (probability level), (6) the research context, (7) practical significance, and (8) indicators with low sustainability values. The aim is to find out which of the 17 country success indicators has the biggest cumulative effect size in order to improve 12 sustainability indicators at once. At first sight HDI seems to make the biggest impact with its β values the biggest in 8 out of 12 CSS Models. Yet Supplementary Section 3 highlights the fact that when they analyse factors with the biggest effect size, researchers, in addition to the research context and the degree of an effect size, need to look at its practical significance, as well as other factors. No sure and simple answer is available and the decision matrix presented in Supplementary Table S9 must, therefore, be analysed using the effect size metrics and INVAR method 46 .

Our analysis of the best global practice (Supplementary Sections 2 and 3 ) shows that the weights of measures of effect size (q j ) and the weights of dependent variables (Q j ) have to be determined for the decision matrix (Supplementary Table S9 ). A range of objective, subjective and integrated weighting methods can be used for that end. When experts determine weights (q j and Q j ), they should consider the research context, practical significance and other factors. Once the cumulative effect size (Q j , P j , N j ) of 17 country success indicators related to the improvement of 12 sustainability indicators are established, we will further analyse the possibilities to improve sustainability indicators. For instance, the following latest global trends towards sustainability merit further in-depth analysis: hybrid ways of working; more climate change disclosures; sustainability becomes the “new normal”; the integrated value chain of CO 2 capture, utilisation, and storage; the move from net-zero to climate positive; innovation in nature-based solutions; testing net zero pledges given by companies; the growing role of regulations globally; legal requirements for companies to disclose their climate risks; the practice to penalise lack of climate action; the input of financial institutions in the race to net-zero; and pairing mitigation with adaptation (Supplementary Section 6 ).

The big picture of the CSS Maps’ research and the related implications are presented in this article. Yet, extensive studies in various fields are needed to validate the results of this research. For this reason, a set of specific criteria with specific weights and certain period-reliant factors are examined in this investigation. Future research will need a focus on more variables with different weights to assess other contexts and periods. These research findings will not only be included in upcoming studies, but will also cover other research areas to validate the results of this multiple criteria analysis by means of CSS Maps and the INVAR method 46 . As part of the integrated multiple criteria analysis examining a range of objects from various areas, this additional analysis will focus on national culture indicators (i.e., secular-rational values vs. traditional values, and self-expression values vs. survival values). In this case, the INVAR method 46 could be used, by means of multiple criteria analysis, to examine various alternatives in three dimensions of sustainability, such as environment (environmental performance index, ecological footprint, environmental health, air quality, PM 2.5 exposure, climate change, happiness index, positive peace index), social (healthy life expectancy, life expectancy at birth, death rates from air pollution), and economic (the gross national income per capita). These then require assessment against many different criteria in relation to the local context. Established combinations of rational alternatives make it possible to ensure appropriate response to the ever-changing situation in the real world. In this context, our research findings are comparable with similar findings presented by the authors mentioned in Supplementary Sections 1 , 4 , and 5 . Like the CSS Maps, various aspects of the three dimensions of sustainability can also be mapped, such as people, economy, poverty and inequality, global links, and others. Naturally, this study has some weaknesses and limitations, and thus needs certain improvements. We present the aspects that need further consideration in this field in Supplementary Section 7 .

Our study method includes the following stages: (1) framing the investigation problem, (2) examining the literature, (3) developing and verifying two hypotheses, (4) collecting data, (5) the multiple criteria examination of 173 countries by means of the Degree of Project Utility and Investment Value Assessments (INVAR) method, (6) calculating correlations between 33 indicators and the success of 173 countries, (7) building 12 regression models, (8) compiling eight Maps (of which seven are CSS Maps) visualizing national success and sustainability, (9) spatial perspective analysis, and (10) performing integrated linear regression, multi-variant design and multiple criteria analysis of national policy alternatives, in order to identify rational decisions.

This research is a quantitative study to examine the way national success affects 12 indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability in 173 countries, and uses the data from 2020, or the latest available.

As investigation methods, our CSS Maps and Models can make it easier to study interdependencies between country success and sustainability. Supplementary Section 1 , 4 , and 5 presents our literature analysis which is carried out to gain deeper insights into our CSS Maps and Models, and to better understand their components in the worldwide research context.

The following two core hypotheses have been proposed and verified for this research:

Hypothesis 1—The increasing success of a country is generally accompanied by increasing values for the three dimensions of sustainability indicators, and declines in these indicators lead to decreases in the country’s success. Improving some sustainability indicators tends to improve other sustainability indicators.

Hypothesis 2—Changes in the number of countries and their traditional key indicators system do not make a very significant difference to the relative national sustainability and success values. Likewise, the boundaries of the seven country clusters discussed in this research do not excessively depend on specific traditional key systems of indicators used in their analysis.

Along with different sets of national 17 success (Supplementary Table S1 ) and 12 sustainability (Supplementary Table S2 ) indicators, the INVAR method 46 (Supplementary Section 2 and Fig. S1 ) was used to measure and map the success of the 173 countries selected as the focus for this research. The traditional statistical indicator systems defining country success and the three dimensions of sustainability are based on studies from various countries analyzed and combined. The INVAR method calculates an integrated criterion characterizing the overall success of the countries. This integrated criterion is directly proportional to the relative effect the values and weights of the given criteria make on the country’s success. The multiple-criteria INVAR analysis method has been applied to various countries, including Asian nations 47 , ex-Soviet states 48 , and a group of 169 countries 49 .

This research used data from the framework of variables taken from various databases and websites, including Transparency International, Global Data, Eurostat-OECD, the World Bank, Knoema, the World Health Organization, Global Finance, Freedom House, Heritage, the Global Footprint Network, Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Our World in Data, Climate Change Knowledge Portal (World Bank Group), and The Institute for Economics and Peace, as well as global and national statistics and publications. All 173 countries analyzed in this article are listed in matrices, along with their 17 detailed success (Supplementary Table S1 ) and 12 sustainability (Supplementary Table S2 ) indicators (systems of indicators, their numbering, values, and weights). The INVAR method 46 was applied to perform multiple criteria analysis of the 173 countries, and the results are presented in Supplementary Table S1 and Figs. 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 . We use equal and different weights of 17 indicators to calculate the deviation of priorities for the 173 countries, which stands at 5.34% (Supplementary Section 2 and Fig. S2 ).

Along with different sets of 12 national sustainability and 17 success indicators, the INVAR method 46 was used to measure and map the success of the 173 countries selected as the focus of this research. The traditional statistical indicator systems defining country success and the three dimensions of sustainability are based on studies from various countries analyzed and combined. The INVAR method calculates an integrated criterion characterizing the overall success of the countries. This integrated criterion is directly proportional to the relative effect the values and weights of the given criteria make on the country’s success.

Supplementary Table S3 shows the correlations between all measures determined by analyzing 173 countries. Supplementary Table S4 reveals the correlation coefficient matrix of the 17 success criteria for each of the 173 countries analyzed in this survey.

Along the vertical axis y we analyze seven sustainability indicators, and along the horizontal axis x we analyze the success and priority indicators (9 CSS Map dimensions). The median correlation between the survival versus self-expression values and the nine CSS Map dimensions (the x-axis and y-axis) is moderate, whereas the median correlation between the traditional versus secular–rational values and the nine CSS Map dimensions is strong (Fig. 1 ).

Tables S5-S8 show the descriptive statistics of 12 CSS Models (Supplementary Section 3 ). Supplementary Table S8 shows the extent to which a 1% increase or decrease in success of country’s features can push sustainability indicators up or down, expressed as a percentage. Supplementary Table S8 also shows the degree to which the percentage changes of success or the values of country’s features explain or fail to explain the dispersion of sustainability indicators. These CSS Models (Supplementary Section 3 ) show that when a country’s success increases by 1%, its 12 indicators related to the three dimensions of sustainability improve by on average 0.85% (Supplementary Table S8 ). Furthermore, the 17 variables of country success used in the CSS Models explain 80.8% on average of the dispersion of the three dimensions of sustainability and 98.2% of the dispersion of the country success variable (Supplementary Table S8 ).

An increase of 1% in a country’s success is accompanied by a 0.39% average increase in its social and environmental (0.84% on average) sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S8 ). On average, the CSS Sustainability Models explain 76.3% of the dispersions among the environmental sustainability indicators, 83.4% of the dispersions among the social sustainability indicators, and 94.5% of the dispersion among economic (i.e. the gross national income per capita) sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S8 ).

The study produced the eight Maps (of which seven are CSS Maps) of the World based on an analysis of 99–150 countries (the 2020 Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map of the World focused on 103 analogical CSS Maps countries). The two dimensions of country success on the CSS Maps are represented in a system of 17 variables (Supplementary Table S1 ). When a country’s success grows, its performance related to the three dimensions of sustainable development increases as well, and the eight Maps (of which seven are CSS Maps) clearly illustrate this relationship (Figs. 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 ). The CSS Maps of the World developed as part of this study are described in Supplementary Section 5 .

Studies from various countries and our research suggest that country success and their features (x-axis) and sustainability indicators (y-axis) are generally strongly interrelated, and move in the same direction over time. This means that successful countries also perform better on sustainability dimensions.

Stage 9 involved analysis of the spatial perspective research in place for explaining and predicting globally recognised physical, spatial, and human patterns in multiple ways. We apply 12 CSS Models, alternative design and multi-criteria analysis methods for spatial perspective analysis (Supplementary Section 4 ).

The following additional two research objectives were set: (1) to determine the impact of a country’s success factors on sustainability metrics, and (2) to offer stakeholders recommendations regarding the strategies for improving sustainability indicators. The ways to improve sustainability indicators are determined by analysing 17 dependent variables (the main paper section “ Practical applications and implications ”, Table S9 ). As previously mentioned, in stage 10, national policy options have been examined by means of integrated linear regression, multi-variant design and multiple criteria analysis to identify rational decisions. Analysis of multiple alternative options and their detailed indicators, with a consideration of the existing state of the micro, meso, and macro environment, can ensure rational country success and sustainability. Below, a brief analysis of several best global practice examples of ways to identify rational policy, activities, and strategy follows. The examples presented below suggest that multiple possible alternatives must be designed, assessed against a system of micro, meso and macro indicators, and the most effective options selected to make countries more sustainable. In Isham and Jackson’s 14 opinion, materialistic lifestyles and values have been associated with adverse effects on human health as well as having detrimental effects on our planet. Therefore, activities and lifestyles should be identified that promote human well-being, yet which at the same time protect ecological security. Isham and Jackson 14 identify optimal activities (arts and crafts, reading, sports, meditating) with high levels of human well-being and low environmental costs. It is important to estimate pollution impacts on health in order to come up with the right policies for better health outcomes. Yet, the task is challenging because economic activity can lead to worse pollution, but can also improve health outcomes in its own right 37 . Humidity, temperature, dispersal by the wind, and other environmental factors contribute to pollution levels. Certain fine particulates can stay in the atmosphere for days, and travel long distances to be inhaled in places far away from the source, even in other continents. Local conditions must be reflected in emissions-control policies, and the global flows of air pollutants must be taken into account 6 . The explanation for the phenomenon of demographic transition could be improved public health in developed countries which results in a move toward a slower life strategy 38 . Studies show that children from wealthier backgrounds undergo puberty later than those from poor socio-economic backgrounds. Early puberty can lead to a variety of health problems and a shorter life. By the early adult years, the effects of exposure to trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other conditions can become apparent in the form of diseases related to aging 9 . Education is a very important factor in economic growth, and is also strongly related to health. In addition to health benefits, substantial increases in education, especially of women, and shrinking gender gaps have an important effect on the roles and status of women in society 36 .

The INVAR method, statistical analysis, and the CSS Maps and Models can help generate multiple policy recommendations for various stakeholders. The possibilities are as follows:

To create alternatives for ways to develop country success and sustainability, by performing countries’ multiple criteria and statistical analysis and identifying decisions that would be rational;

to perform quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing data and to interpret it. The results obtained this way would prompt automatic recommendations designed for different stakeholders on ways to improve country sustainability.

Data availability

Summary data tables appear in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials . The authors can deliver the applied raw data used for obtaining the conclusions in this paper to others upon request. All data utilized for this research can be downloaded from freely accessible websites.

United Nations. General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming Our World, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (2015).

Romanello, M. et al. The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Code red for a healthy future. The Lancet 398 (10311), 1619–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Carleton, T. A. & Hsiang, S. M. Social and economic impacts of climate. Science 353 (6304), aad9837. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9837 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bathiany, S., Dakos, V., Scheffer, M. & Lenton, T. M. Climate models predict increasing temperature variability in poor countries. Sci. Adv. 4 (5), eaar5809. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5809 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Watts, N. et al. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: From 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. The Lancet 391 (10120), 581–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9 (2018).

Lelieveld, J. & Pöschl, U. Chemists can help to solve the air-pollution health crisis. Nature 551 , 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-05906-9 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. & Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525 , 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371 (2015).

Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F. & Patel, V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. Science 370 (6522), 214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0214 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sohn, E. How the COVID-19 pandemic might age us. Nature 601 , S5–S7. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00071-0 (2022).

Murphy, R. H. Governance and the dimensions of autocracy. Const. Polit. Econ. 30 (2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-018-9270-5 (2019).

Chang, C. P. & Lee, C. C. Globalization and economic growth: A political economy analysis for OECD countries. Glob. Econ. Rev. 39 (2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2010.483835 (2010).

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. Participation and development: Perspectives from the comprehensive development paradigm. Rev. Dev. Econ. 6 (2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00148 (2002).

Funke, M. & Zhong, D. The political globalisation trilemma revisited: An empirical assessment across countries and over time. SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694779 (2020).

Isham, A. & Jackson, T. Finding flow: Exploring the potential for sustainable fulfilment. Lancet Planet. Health 6 (1), e66–e74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00286-2 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Patz, J. A., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Holloway, T. & Foley, J. A. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438 , 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04188 (2005).

Jamison, D. T. et al. Global health 2035: A world converging within a generation. The Lancet 382 (9908), 1898–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62105-4 (2013).

Charfeddine, L. The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: Evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Econ. 65 , 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009 (2017).

Li, Y. et al. A psychophysical measurement on subjective well-being and air pollution. Nat. Commun. 10 , 5473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13459-w (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

McDuffie, E. E. et al. Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM25 and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales. Nat. Commun. 12 , 3594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23853-y (2021).

Pye, H. O., Ward-Caviness, C. K., Murphy, B. N., Appel, K. W. & Seltzer, K. M. Secondary organic aerosol association with cardiorespiratory disease mortality in the United States. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27484-1 (2021).

Haerpfer, C. et al . (eds.). World Values Survey: Round Seven—Country-Pooled Datafile Version 4.0 . Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.18 (2022).

Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R. & Dogan, E. Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: The role of ecological footprint. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (29), 29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4 (2018).

Wang, J. & Dong, K. What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci. Total Environ. 656 , 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354 (2019).

Cepparulo, A., Eusepi, G. & Giuriato, L. Can constitutions bring about revolutions? How to enhance decarbonization success. Environ. Sci. Policy 93 , 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.019 (2019).

Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Burke, M. Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 (20), 9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816020116 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bressler, R. D., Moore, F. C., Rennert, K. & Anthoff, D. Estimates of country level temperature-related mortality damage functions. Sci. Rep. 11 , 20282. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99156-5 (2021).

Omri, A., Mabrouk, N. B. & Sassi-Tmar, A. Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 , 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.046 (2015).

Apergis, N. The impact of greenhouse gas emissions on personal well-being: Evidence from a panel of 58 countries and aggregate and regional country samples. J. Happiness Stud. 19 (1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9809-y (2018).

DiRienzo, C. E. The effect of women in government on country-level peace. Glob. Change Peace Secur. 31 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2018.1481023 (2019).

Squalli, J. Electricity consumption and economic growth: Bounds and causality analyses of OPEC members. Energy Econ. 29 (6), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.10.001 (2007).

Herzer, D. & Strulik, H. Religiosity and income: A panel cointegration and causality analysis. Appl. Econ. 49 (30), 2922–2938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1251562 (2017).

Bayar, Y. & Gavriletea, M. D. Peace, terrorism and economic growth in Middle East and North African countries. Qual. Quant. 52 (5), 2373–2392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0671-8 (2018).

Kongbuamai, N., Bui, Q., Yousaf, H. M. A. U. & Liu, Y. The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: A case study of ASEAN countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (16), 19251–19264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x (2020).

Haller, M. in Class structure in Europe. ME Sharpe. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Economic Analysis Vol. 5 (2003).

Fog, A. A test of the reproducibility of the clustering of cultural variables. Cross-Cult. Res. 55 (1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397120956948 (2020).

Gakidou, E., Cowling, K., Lozano, R. & Murray, C. J. Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: A systematic analysis. The Lancet 376 (9745), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61257-3 (2010).

Heft-Neal, S., Burney, J., Bendavid, E., Voss, K. K. & Burke, M. Dust pollution from the Sahara and African infant mortality. Nat. Sustain. 3 , 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0562-1 (2020).

Sýkorová, K. & Flegr, J. Faster life history strategy manifests itself by lower age at menarche, higher sexual desire, and earlier reproduction in people with worse health. Sci. Rep. 11 , 11254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90579-8 (2021).

Wlezien, C. Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. J. Polit. 66 (1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00139.x (2004).

Gans-Morse, J. & Nichter, S. Economic reforms and democracy: Evidence of a J-curve in Latin America. Comp. Pol. Stud. 41 (10), 1398–1426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007305811 (2008).

Botero, J. C. & Ponce, A. Measuring the Rule of Law . SSRN 1966257 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1966257 (2011).

Habel, P. & Grant, J. T. Demand for God and government: The dynamics of religion and public opinion. Polit. Religion 6 (2), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048312000570 (2013).

Gokmenoglu, K. & Alptekin, V. Re-examination of Wagners law for OECD countries. Ann.Constantin Brancusi Univ. Targu-Jiu Econ. Ser. 1 , 5 (2013).

Google Scholar

Sobel, R. S. & Coyne, C. J. Cointegrating institutions: The time-series properties of country institutional measures. J. Law Econ. 54 (1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/652304 (2011).

Coyne, C. & Sobel, R. S. in How are Institutions Related? In Economic Freedom of the World: 2010 Annual Report, Chapter 3 (eds Gwartney, J. D. et al .) 163–174 (Fraser Institute, 2010) https://www.fraserinstitute.org/ .

Kaklauskas, A. Degree of project utility and investment value assessments. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 11 (5), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2016.5.2679 (2016).

Kaklauskas, A. et al. Are environmental sustainability and happiness the keys to prosperity in Asian nations?. Ecol. Ind. 119 , 106562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106562 (2020).

Kaklauskas, A. et al. Multiple criteria analysis of environmental sustainability and quality of life in post-Soviet states. Ecol. Ind. 89 , 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.070 (2018).

Kaklauskas, A., Milevicius, V. & Kaklauskiene, L. Effects of country success on COVID-19 cumulative cases and excess deaths in 169 countries. Ecol. Ind. 137 , 108703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108703 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded as part of the BIM4REN project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 820773. Also, this work was supported by Project No. 2020-1-LT01-KA203-078100 “Minimizing the influence of coronavirus in a built environment” (MICROBE) from the European Union’s Erasmus + program. Gratitude is extended to V. Milevicius for statistical calculations and analysis and to R. Virbaliene for creating the figures.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Aveniu 11, Vilnius, Lithuania

A. Kaklauskas & L. Kaklauskiene

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K.: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft. L.K.: data curation, investigation, formal analysis, validation, visualization, writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kaklauskas .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information 1., supplementary tables., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kaklauskas, A., Kaklauskiene, L. Analysis of the impact of success on three dimensions of sustainability in 173 countries. Sci Rep 12 , 14719 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19131-6

Download citation

Received : 20 June 2022

Accepted : 24 August 2022

Published : 30 August 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19131-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Synergy of climate change with country success and city quality of life.

Arturas Kaklauskas
Ajith Abraham
Ulijona Kaklauskaite

Scientific Reports (2023)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Human Development Report 2023-24
The paths to equal
2023 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
2023 Gender Social Norms Index Publication
Human Development Index
Country Insights
Human Climate Horizons data and insights platform
Thematic Composite Indices
Documentation and downloads
What is Human development?
NHDR/RHDR Report preparation toolkit

Human Development and Sustainability

Neumayer, Eric. 2010. Human Development and Sustainability. New York.

Announcement: 2021/22 Human Development Report set to be released on 8 September 2022

Two steps forward, one step back - where are we heading with gender equality?

Human Development and Sustainability

Living reference work entry
First Online: 19 September 2020
Cite this living reference work entry

Manoranjan Mohanty 8

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

85 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Alkaire S, Deneulin S (2009) Chapter 2: The human development and capability approach. In: Deneulin S, Shahani L (eds) An introduction to human development and capability approach. Earthscan, London, pp 22–48

Google Scholar

Alkire S (2002) Dimensions of human development. World Dev 30(2):181–205

Article Google Scholar

Alkire S (2010) Conceptual overview of human development; definitions, critiques, and related concepts. Human Development Research Paper 1. UNDP-HDRO, New York

Anand P (2016) Happiness, wellbeing and human development: the case of subjective measures. Background Paper. United Nations Development Programme, New York

Anand S, Sen A (1996) Sustainable human development: concepts and priorities. Office of Development Studies Discussion Paper 1. United Nations Development Programme, New York

Anand S, Sen AK (1997) Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective. Human Development Report 1997. UNDP, New York

Anand S, Sen AK (2000a) Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev 28(12):2029–2049

Anand S, Sen AK (2000b) Human development and human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Beaglehole R (2015) Sustainable human development-but how? Perspectives 386(10,007):1934–1935

de Neve J, Sachs JD (2020) Chapter 6: Sustainable development and human well-being. In: Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) World happiness report. Sustainable Solutions Network, New York, pp 112–126

Deneulin S, Shahani L (2009) An introduction to human development and capability approach. Earthscan, London

Book Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr S (2003) The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Fem Econ 9(2–3):301–317

Fukuda-Parr S, Shiva Kumar AK (eds) (2003) Readings in human development: concepts, measures and policies for a development paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York

Haq M-u (1995) Reflections on human development. Oxford University Press, New York

Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) (2012) World happiness report. Sustainable Solutions Network, New York

Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) (2019) World happiness report. Sustainable Solutions Network, New York

Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) (2020) World happiness report. Sustainable Solutions Network, New York

Lessmann O (2015) Sustainability as a challenge to capability approach. In: Rauschmayer FI, Newman BM, Newman PR (eds) Theories of human development. Psychology Press, New York

Lessmann O, Rauschmayer F (eds) (2014) The capability approach and sustainability. Routledge, London

Maccari N (2014) Environmental sustainability and human development: a greening of human development index. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272302769_Environmental_Sustainability_and_Human_Development_A_Greening_of_Human_Development_Index . Accessed 15 June 2020

McGillivray M, Matthew C (eds) (2006) Understanding human well-being. United Nations University Press, New York

Measure of America (2020) About human development. https://measureofamerica.org/human-development/ . Accessed 5 May 2020

Mestrum F (2003) Poverty reduction and sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 5:41–61

Morse S (2003) Greening the United Nations’ human development index? Sustain Dev 11:183–198

Mosteanu D, Mihaila-Lica G, Halmaghi E, Mosteanu R (2014) The sustainable development-human development. Manag Econ 1(73):106–113

Neumayer E (2001) The human development index and sustainability: a constructive proposal. Ecol Econ 39(1):101–114

Neumayer E (2010) Human development and sustainability. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report: Research Paper 2010/05. United Nations Development Programme, London

Neumayer E (2012) Human development and sustainability. J Hum Dev Capab 13(4):561–579

Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: a study in human capabilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York

Peeters W, Dirix J, Sterckx S (2013) Putting sustainability into sustainable human development: the case for functioning constraints. J Hum Dev Capab 14(1):58–76

Pelenc J, Lompo MK, Ballet J, Dubois J (2013) Sustainable human development and the capability approach: integrating environment, responsibility and collective agency. J Hum Dev Capab 14:77–94

Rannis G, Stewart F, Samman E (2007) Human development: beyond human development index. J Hum Dev 7(3):323–358

Rauschmayer F, Omann I, Fruhmann J (2011) Sustainable development: capabilities, needs, and well-being. Routledge, London

Schimmel J (2009) Development as happiness: the subjective perception of happiness and UNDP’s analysis of poverty, wealth and development. J Happiness Stud 10:93–111

Sen A (1985) Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Sen AK (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 30–53

Chapter Google Scholar

Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, New York

Sen A (2000) A decade of human development. J Hum Dev 1(1):17–23

Sen A (2008) The economics of happiness and capability. In: Bruni L, Comim F, Pugno M (eds) Capabilities and happiness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–27

Srinivasan TN (1994) Human development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel. Am Econ Rev 84(2):238–243

Stewart F (2013) Capabilities and human development: beyond the individual –the critical role of social institutions and social competencies. Occasional Paper 3. UNDP, New York

Tomer JF (2016) Integrating human capital with human development: the path to a more productive and humane economy. In: Palgrave advances in behavioral economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 17–38

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1990) Human development report 1990: concept and measurement of human development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1992) Human development report 1992. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1993) Participatory development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1994) Human development report 1994: new dimensions of human development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1997) Human development report 1997: human development to eradicate poverty. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1998) Human development report 1998: consumption for human development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1999) Human development report 1999: globalisation with human face. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2010a) Human development and sustainability. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2010b) Human development report 2010: the real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2014) Human development report 2014: sustaining human Progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2015) Human development report 2015: work for human development. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2016) Human development report 2016: human development for everyone. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2018a) HDI: technical notes. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2018_technical_notes.pdf . Accessed 30 May 2020

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2018b) Human development indices and indicators: 2018 statistical updates. http://www.hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf . Accessed 17 June 2020

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2019) Human development report 2019: beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: inequalities in human development in the 21st century. Oxford University Press, New York

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (n.d.-a) Gender Development Index (GDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-development-index-gdi . Accessed 27 May 2020

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (n.d.-b) Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi . Accessed 27 May 2020

United Nations (2013) Sustainable Development Goals. http://www.unfoundation.org/features/globalgoals/the-global-goals.html . Accessed 20 June 2020

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future: the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Zurick D (2006) Gross national happiness and environmental status in Bhutan. Geogr Rev 96(4):657–681

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji

Manoranjan Mohanty

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoranjan Mohanty .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

European School of Sustainability, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Walter Leal Filho

Center for Neuroscience & Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Anabela Marisa Azul

Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo, Brazil

Luciana Brandli

HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Amanda Lange Salvia

Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

Pinar Gökcin Özuyar

International Centre for Thriving, University of Chester, Chester, UK

Section Editor information

Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

Katarzyna Cichos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Mohanty, M. (2020). Human Development and Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (eds) No Poverty. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_6-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_6-1

Received : 12 July 2020

Accepted : 29 July 2020

Published : 19 September 2020

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-69625-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-69625-6

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Earth and Environm. Science Reference Module Physical and Materials Science Reference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Beginner's Guide
Past Papers
CSP Members
Members List
Social Groups
Mark Forums Read
No Investment on People
Poor Investment on People
Lack of Attention to Education and Health
Infant Health and Mortality
Spending of Meager Resources on Education and Health
The Model of Development is Development
Measurement of Economic Growth through GDP
Education, Health, Social Welfare are not Primary Goals
Lower status of Education, Health & Nutrition, and Employment in*the Annual Economic Survey
Human Development - Not a Primary and Important Goat for Govts
Govts aren't Judged by Their Performance of Human Development Outcomes
Human Development is not the End-Goal
Neglection of Human*Development in Mega Projects (CPEC)
Present Govt and its Priorities

MyU : For Students, Faculty, and Staff

Fall 2024 CSCI Special Topics Courses

Cloud computing.

Meeting Time: 09:45 AM‑11:00 AM TTh Instructor: Ali Anwar Course Description: Cloud computing serves many large-scale applications ranging from search engines like Google to social networking websites like Facebook to online stores like Amazon. More recently, cloud computing has emerged as an essential technology to enable emerging fields such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and Machine Learning. The exponential growth of data availability and demands for security and speed has made the cloud computing paradigm necessary for reliable, financially economical, and scalable computation. The dynamicity and flexibility of Cloud computing have opened up many new forms of deploying applications on infrastructure that cloud service providers offer, such as renting of computation resources and serverless computing. This course will cover the fundamentals of cloud services management and cloud software development, including but not limited to design patterns, application programming interfaces, and underlying middleware technologies. More specifically, we will cover the topics of cloud computing service models, data centers resource management, task scheduling, resource virtualization, SLAs, cloud security, software defined networks and storage, cloud storage, and programming models. We will also discuss data center design and management strategies, which enable the economic and technological benefits of cloud computing. Lastly, we will study cloud storage concepts like data distribution, durability, consistency, and redundancy. Registration Prerequisites: CS upper div, CompE upper div., EE upper div., EE grad, ITI upper div., Univ. honors student, or dept. permission; no cr for grads in CSci. Complete the following Google form to request a permission number from the instructor ( https://forms.gle/6BvbUwEkBK41tPJ17 ).

CSCI 5980/8980

Machine learning for healthcare: concepts and applications.

Meeting Time: 11:15 AM‑12:30 PM TTh Instructor: Yogatheesan Varatharajah Course Description: Machine Learning is transforming healthcare. This course will introduce students to a range of healthcare problems that can be tackled using machine learning, different health data modalities, relevant machine learning paradigms, and the unique challenges presented by healthcare applications. Applications we will cover include risk stratification, disease progression modeling, precision medicine, diagnosis, prognosis, subtype discovery, and improving clinical workflows. We will also cover research topics such as explainability, causality, trust, robustness, and fairness.

Registration Prerequisites: CSCI 5521 or equivalent. Complete the following Google form to request a permission number from the instructor ( https://forms.gle/z8X9pVZfCWMpQQ6o6 ).

Visualization with AI

Meeting Time: 04:00 PM‑05:15 PM TTh Instructor: Qianwen Wang Course Description: This course aims to investigate how visualization techniques and AI technologies work together to enhance understanding, insights, or outcomes.

This is a seminar style course consisting of lectures, paper presentation, and interactive discussion of the selected papers. Students will also work on a group project where they propose a research idea, survey related studies, and present initial results.

This course will cover the application of visualization to better understand AI models and data, and the use of AI to improve visualization processes. Readings for the course cover papers from the top venues of AI, Visualization, and HCI, topics including AI explainability, reliability, and Human-AI collaboration. This course is designed for PhD students, Masters students, and advanced undergraduates who want to dig into research.

Registration Prerequisites: Complete the following Google form to request a permission number from the instructor ( https://forms.gle/YTF5EZFUbQRJhHBYA ). Although the class is primarily intended for PhD students, motivated juniors/seniors and MS students who are interested in this topic are welcome to apply, ensuring they detail their qualifications for the course.

Visualizations for Intelligent AR Systems

Meeting Time: 04:00 PM‑05:15 PM MW Instructor: Zhu-Tian Chen Course Description: This course aims to explore the role of Data Visualization as a pivotal interface for enhancing human-data and human-AI interactions within Augmented Reality (AR) systems, thereby transforming a broad spectrum of activities in both professional and daily contexts. Structured as a seminar, the course consists of two main components: the theoretical and conceptual foundations delivered through lectures, paper readings, and discussions; and the hands-on experience gained through small assignments and group projects. This class is designed to be highly interactive, and AR devices will be provided to facilitate hands-on learning. Participants will have the opportunity to experience AR systems, develop cutting-edge AR interfaces, explore AI integration, and apply human-centric design principles. The course is designed to advance students' technical skills in AR and AI, as well as their understanding of how these technologies can be leveraged to enrich human experiences across various domains. Students will be encouraged to create innovative projects with the potential for submission to research conferences.

Registration Prerequisites: Complete the following Google form to request a permission number from the instructor ( https://forms.gle/Y81FGaJivoqMQYtq5 ). Students are expected to have a solid foundation in either data visualization, computer graphics, computer vision, or HCI. Having expertise in all would be perfect! However, a robust interest and eagerness to delve into these subjects can be equally valuable, even though it means you need to learn some basic concepts independently.

Sustainable Computing: A Systems View

Meeting Time: 09:45 AM‑11:00 AM Instructor: Abhishek Chandra Course Description: In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the pervasiveness, scale, and distribution of computing infrastructure: ranging from cloud, HPC systems, and data centers to edge computing and pervasive computing in the form of micro-data centers, mobile phones, sensors, and IoT devices embedded in the environment around us. The growing amount of computing, storage, and networking demand leads to increased energy usage, carbon emissions, and natural resource consumption. To reduce their environmental impact, there is a growing need to make computing systems sustainable. In this course, we will examine sustainable computing from a systems perspective. We will examine a number of questions: • How can we design and build sustainable computing systems? • How can we manage resources efficiently? • What system software and algorithms can reduce computational needs? Topics of interest would include: • Sustainable system design and architectures • Sustainability-aware systems software and management • Sustainability in large-scale distributed computing (clouds, data centers, HPC) • Sustainability in dispersed computing (edge, mobile computing, sensors/IoT)

Registration Prerequisites: This course is targeted towards students with a strong interest in computer systems (Operating Systems, Distributed Systems, Networking, Databases, etc.). Background in Operating Systems (Equivalent of CSCI 5103) and basic understanding of Computer Networking (Equivalent of CSCI 4211) is required.

Future undergraduate students
Future transfer students
Future graduate students
Future international students
Diversity and Inclusion Opportunities
Learn abroad
Living Learning Communities
Mentor programs
Programs for women
Student groups
Visit, Apply & Next Steps
Information for current students
Departments and majors overview
Departments
Undergraduate majors
Graduate programs
Integrated Degree Programs
Additional degree-granting programs
Online learning
Academic Advising overview
Academic Advising FAQ
Academic Advising Blog
Appointments and drop-ins
Academic support
Commencement
Four-year plans
Honors advising
Policies, procedures, and forms
Career Services overview
Resumes and cover letters
Jobs and internships
Interviews and job offers
CSE Career Fair
Major and career exploration
Graduate school
Collegiate Life overview
Scholarships
Diversity & Inclusivity Alliance
Anderson Student Innovation Labs
Information for alumni
Get engaged with CSE
Upcoming events
CSE Alumni Society Board
Alumni volunteer interest form
Golden Medallion Society Reunion
50-Year Reunion
Alumni honors and awards
Outstanding Achievement
Alumni Service
Distinguished Leadership
Honorary Doctorate Degrees
Nobel Laureates
Alumni resources
Alumni career resources
Alumni news outlets
CSE branded clothing
International alumni resources
Inventing Tomorrow magazine
Update your info
CSE giving overview
Why give to CSE?
College priorities
Give online now
External relations
Giving priorities
Donor stories
Impact of giving
Ways to give to CSE
Matching gifts
CSE directories
Invest in your company and the future
Recruit our students
Connect with researchers
K-12 initiatives
Diversity initiatives
Research news
Give to CSE
CSE priorities
Corporate relations
Information for faculty and staff
Administrative offices overview
Office of the Dean
Academic affairs
Finance and Operations
Communications
Human resources
Undergraduate programs and student services
CSE Committees
CSE policies overview
Academic policies
Faculty hiring and tenure policies
Finance policies and information
Graduate education policies
Human resources policies
Research policies
Research overview
Research centers and facilities
Research proposal submission process
Research safety
Award-winning CSE faculty
National academies
University awards
Honorary professorships
Collegiate awards
Other CSE honors and awards
Staff awards
Performance Management Process
Work. With Flexibility in CSE
K-12 outreach overview
Summer camps
Outreach events
Enrichment programs
Field trips and tours
CSE K-12 Virtual Classroom Resources
Educator development
Sponsor an event

IMAGES

Human Development and economic sustainability
Human Development and Economic Sustainability
CSS ESSAYS 2022: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY
Human development and economic sustainability. (Outline, CSS-2022)
Human Development and Economic Sustainability Mock English Essay| CSS
500+ Words Essay on Sustainable Development with PDF |Leverage Edu

VIDEO

Is Philippines growing or falling 2023?
Jay Blazek Crossley: Land use, Transportation, Planning, and Equity Reforms
Society & Organizations Institute: Promoting Sustainability And Unleashing Human Potential
Sustainability is The Most Ambitious Project Humanity Has Ever Faced
364 Economic Growth, Economic Development and Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development

COMMENTS

Human Development and Economic Sustainability
An overview of the terms: 'Human Development and Economic Sustainability', and their Connection. Moving towards the understanding of the terms, human development is a broad concept encompassing the citizen's overall quality of life, warranting access to public resources and meeting basic human needs. Delving deep into its concept, the ...
Human Development and Economic Sustainability Outline
Dear aspirants, i have attempted this topic in css 2022 essay with this outline.. I would appreciate your evaluation.. Topic: Human development and Economic Sustainability 1- Introduction Thesis statement: In the modern nation-state system, human development has become a vital tool. In fact, human development leads to economic sustainability.
CSS English Essay 2022: Human Development and Economic Sustainability
English essay is the biggest hurdle in the Civil Superior Services Examination (CSS /PMS). Aspirants of CSS and PMS have to go a long way to pass this very e...
Human Development And Economic Sustainability CSS Essay
Economic Sustainability. Economic sustainability refers to practices that support long-term economic growth without negatively impacting social, environmental, and cultural aspects of the community. Human development helps in economic sustainability in the following ways. Opportunities for small to medium entrepreneurs. Development of new markets.
Human Development and Economic Sustainability
Abstract. This paper attempts to integrate the concern for human development in the present with that in the future. In arguing for sustainable human development, it appeals to the notion of ethical "universalism"—an elementary demand for impartiality of claims—applied within and between generations. Economic sustainability is often ...
PDF Human Development and Economic Sustainability*
PII: S0305-750X(00)00071-1. ment Reports do full justice to the idea. But its focus on universalism is something of impor-tance for contemporary debates on public policy. The growing concern with ``sustainable development'' re ̄ects a basic belief that the interests of future generations should receive the same kind of attention that those in ...
[PDF] Human Development and Economic Sustainability
Ð This paper attempts to integrate the concern for human development in the present with that in the future. In arguing for sustainable human development, it appeals to the notion of ethical ``universalism''Ðan elementary demand for impartiality of claimsÐapplied within and between generations. Economic sustainability is often seen as a matter of intergenerational equity, but the speci ...
Human Development and economic sustainability
Human Development and economic sustainability | CSS 2022 Solved Essay | CSS 2022 Essay | CSS 2022 is a video that contains essay on the topic of human develo...
Human Development and Economic Sustainability Mock English Essay| CSS
This video is about English essay on the topic of human development and Economic Sustainability. Economy is the back bone of all of countries. Pakistan's eco...
Analysis of the impact of success on three dimensions of sustainability
On average, 80.8% of the dispersions for the indicators of the three dimensions of sustainability are explained by our CSS Models, while for national success the same indicator equals 98.2% ...
[PDF] Human Development and Economic Sustainability
Paradigm of sustainability in the concept of human development. Samir Ljajić Maja Stošković A. Kostić. Environmental Science, Philosophy. 2018. The concept of human development combines the production and distribution of goods. The use of income is as important as its generation. There are four components of human development: equity,….
Human Development and Sustainability
The literatures and debates on human development on the one hand and sustainability on the other share much in common. Human development is essentially what sustainability advocates want to sustain and without sustainability, human development is not true human development. Yet the two strands of research have largely been separate and this paper shows how they can learn from each other.
CSS Forums
Dear aspirants, i have attempted this topic in css 2022 essay with this outline.. I would appreciate your evaluation.. Thesis statement: In the modern nation-state system, human development has become a vital tool. In fact, human development leads to economic sustainability. b) Provision of skilled training programmes.
Human Development and Sustainability
In this entry, human development and sustainability is discussed critically. The concept of human development was developed by Mahbub ul Haq ( 1995 ). The concept is closely linked to other concepts such as "human capability," human freedom, human right, poverty, human capital, economic growth, well-being, and happiness.
The Key to Balancing Human Development and Economic Sustainability
Human development and economic sustainability are two crucial factors that go hand in hand. In this video, we delve into the complex dynamics of these two co...
Human Development
Pakistan's ranking on the*Human Development Index (HDI) in 2018, based on 2017 data, is 150th out of 189 countries. India (130th), Bangladesh (136th) and Nepal (149th) are ahead of us. Sri Lanka, ranked 76th, is the star performer of the region. These are tough times but even when we have had periods of high economic growth our gains on the ...
Sustainability
Human development plays a profound role in achieving sustainable development, by utilizing the power of well-educated blue- and white-collar laborers, academics, politicians, and people from every layer of society and the economy. However, there is no single path for human development. Planning, designing, and implementing policies for human development require country-specific approaches ...
Human Development & Economic Sustainability
In this video I have explained how human development is related to economic sustainability of a nation.Do subscribe to watch more videos.LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, SHA...
Fall 2024 CSCI Special Topics Courses
Meeting Time: 04:00 PM‑05:15 PM MW. Instructor: Zhu-Tian Chen. Course Description: This course aims to explore the role of Data Visualization as a pivotal interface for enhancing human-data and human-AI interactions within Augmented Reality (AR) systems, thereby transforming a broad spectrum of activities in both professional and daily contexts.

Human Development and Economic Sustainability

Introduction

An overview of the terms: ‘Human Development and Economic Sustainability’, and their Connection

How does human development lead a country towards economic sustainability?

CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

PMS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers

Articles Might Interest You!

Recent Posts

Top Categories

More Courses

Basic English Grammar and Writing Course

Extensive English Essay & Precis Course for CSS and PMS

CSS English Essay and Precis Crash Course for 2023

@ 2023 Cssprepforum. All RightsReserved.

Human Development And Economic Sustainability CSS Essay

Globalization Of Markets CSS Essay

Related Posts

Religious Extremism And Intolerance

Checkered Democratic History Of Pakistan – CSS Essay

Global Power Dynamics and Pakistan’s Foreign Policy

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Analysis of the impact of success on three dimensions of sustainability in 173 countries

Similar content being viewed by others

Global effects of progress towards Sustainable Development Goals on subjective well-being

Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals

Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time

Introduction

Discussion and conclusions

Practical applications and implications

Data availability

Acknowledgements

Author information

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Supplementary Information

About this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Quick links

Human Development and Sustainability

Announcement: 2021/22 Human Development Report set to be released on 8 September 2022

Two steps forward, one step back - where are we heading with gender equality?

Human Development and Sustainability

Access this chapter

Author information

Corresponding author

Editor information

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Download citation

Fall 2024 CSCI Special Topics Courses

CSCI 5980/8980

Visualization with AI

Visualizations for Intelligent AR Systems

Sustainable Computing: A Systems View

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS