(%)
Others in profession: health officer, anesthesiologist, and radiographer; N : number. Others in ethnicity: SNNPs, Benishangul-Gumuz, and Gambella. Others in religion: Adventist, pagan.
Overall, 51.0% and 59.6% of respondents worked in a pleasant and safe working environment, respectively. Around 48.5% and 60.8% of respondents got adequate supportive supervision and freedom on their jobs, respectively. Only 21.6% and 37.5% of the participants were given a clear job description and used their annual leave in public hospitals.
The majority of the respondents, 88.4% at the public and 87% at private hospitals, had a high workload. About 37.5% and 69% of public and private hospitals had got short-term training. Twelve and 17.4% of participants were satisfied with recognition, reward, and pay and benefit in public hospitals. Similarly, most of the respondents 87.7%, 63.6%, and 82.8% had good coworker relationships, adequate supportive supervision, and high affective commitment in private hospitals, respectively ( Table 2 ).
Organizational and job-related characteristics of health professionals working at public and private hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia ( n = 520), 2020.
Variables | Public hospitals ( = 259) (%) | Private hospitals ( = 283) (%) | Total ( = 520) (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Job description | Yes | 56 (21.6) | 242 (92.7) | 298 (57.3) |
No | 203 (78.4) | 19 (7.3) | 222 (42.7) | |
Short-term training | Yes | 97 (37.5) | 180 (69.0) | 277 (53.3) |
No | 162 (62.5) | 81 (31.0) | 243 (46.7) | |
Annual leave | Yes | 108 (41.7) | 182 (69.70) | 290 (55.8) |
No | 151 (58.3) | 79 (30.3) | 230 (44.2) | |
Nature of work | Pleasant | 87 (33.6) | 178 (68.2) | 265 (51.0) |
Unpleasant | 172 (66.4) | 83 (31.8) | 255 (49.0) | |
Responsibility | Yes | 98 (37.8) | 191 (73.2) | 289 (55.6) |
No | 161 (62.2) | 70 (26.8) | 231 (44.4) | |
Workload | High | 229 (88.4) | 227 (87.0) | 456 (87.7) |
Low | 30 (11.6) | 34 (13.0) | 64 (12.3) | |
Work environment | Safe | 112 (43.2) | 198 (75.9) | 310 (59.6) |
Unsafe | 147 (56.8) | 63 (24.1) | 210 (40.4) | |
Coworker relationship | Good | 176 (68.0) | 229 (87.7) | 405 (77.9) |
Poor | 83 (32.0) | 32 (12.3) | 115 (22.1) | |
Autonomy | Yes | 132 (51.0) | 184 (70.5) | 316 (60.8) |
No | 127 (49.0) | 77 (29.5) | 204 (39.2) | |
Pay and benefit | Fair | 44 (17.0) | 28 (10.7) | 72 (13.8) |
Unfair | 215 (83.0) | 233 (89.3) | 448 (86.2) | |
Organizational policy and strategy | Comfortable | 54 (20.8) | 152 (58.2) | 206 (39.6) |
Uncomfortable | 205 (79.2) | 109 (41.8) | 314 (60.4) | |
Performance appraisal | Yes | 56 (21.6) | 42 (16.1) | 98 (18.8) |
No | 203 (78.4) | 219 (83.9) | 422 (81.2) | |
Recognition and reward | Yes | 31 (12.0) | 57 (21.8) | 88 (16.9) |
No | 228 (88.0) | 204 (78.2) | 432 (83.1) | |
Supportive supervision | Adequate | 86 (33.2) | 166 (63.6) | 252 (48.5) |
Inadequate | 173 (66.8) | 95 (36.4) | 268 (51.5) | |
Educational opportunity | Yes | 40 (15.4) | 21 (8.0) | 61 (11.7) |
No | 219 (84.6) | 240 (92.0) | 459 (88.3) | |
Affective commitment | High | 170 (65.6) | 216 (82.8) | 386 (74.2) |
Low | 89 (34.4) | 45 (17.2) | 134 (25.8) | |
Normative commitment | High | 90 (34.7) | 154 (59.0) | 244 (46.9) |
Low | 169 (65.3) | 107 (41.0) | 276 (53.1) | |
Continuance commitment | High | 58 (22.4) | 138 (52.9) | 196 (37.7) |
Low | 201 (77.6) | 123 (47.1) | 324 (62.3) |
In this study, among job satisfaction items, the highest respondents' value was for the praise they get for doing a good job (67.1%), whereas the lowest respondents' value was for the way their coworkers get along with each other (47.9%). Healthcare professionals' overall magnitude of job satisfaction was 55.2% (95% CI: 51.0, 59.4%). However, the magnitude of job satisfaction at the public hospital was 29.0% (95% CI: 23.2, 35.1%) and at the private hospitals was 81.23% (95% CI: 76.6, 85.8%) ( Table 3 ).
Magnitude of job satisfaction among health professionals working at public and private hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia ( n = 520), 2020.
Job satisfaction items | VD, (%) | D, (%) | N, (%) | S, (%) | VS, (%) | Satisfied, (%) | Dissatisfied, (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Being able to keep not being busy all the time | 206 (39.6) | 44 (8.5) | 95 (18.3) | 156 (30) | 19 (3.7) | 270 (51.9) | 250 (48.1) |
The chance to work alone on the job | 65 (12.5) | 159 (30.6) | 91 (17.5) | 138 (26.5) | 67 (12.9) | 296 (56.9) | 224 (43.1) |
The chance to do different things from time to time | 50 (9.6) | 189 (36.3) | 114 (21.9) | 91 (17.5) | 76 (14.6) | 281 (54.0) | 239 (46.0) |
The chance to be somebody in the community | 30 (5.8) | 202 (38.8) | 127 (24.4) | 51 (9.8) | 110 (21.2) | 288 (55.4) | 232 (44.6) |
The way my boss handles his/her workers | 53 (10.2) | 204 (39.2) | 138 (26.5) | 71 (13.7) | 54 (10.4) | 263 (50.6) | 257 (49.4) |
The competence of my supervisor in making decision | 39 (7.5) | 182 (35) | 163 (31.3) | 83 (16.0) | 53 (10.2) | 299 (57.5) | 221 (42.5) |
Being able to do things that do not go against my conscience | 29 (5.6) | 219 (42.1) | 129 (24.8) | 70 (13.5) | 73 (14.0) | 272 (52.3) | 248 (47.7) |
The way my job provides for steady employment | 31 (6.0) | 217 (41.7) | 112 (21.5) | 65 (12.5) | 95 (18.3) | 272 (52.3) | 248 (47.7) |
The chance to be responsible for the work of others | 33 (6.3) | 178 (34.2) | 169 (32.5) | 79 (15.2) | 61 (11.7) | 309 (59.4) | 211 (40.6) |
The chance to tell people what to do | 31 (6.0) | 232 (44.6) | 123 (23.7) | 48 (9.2) | 86 (16.5) | 257 (49.4) | 263 (50.6) |
The chance to do something that makes use of my abilities | 34 (6.5) | 208 (40.0) | 124 (23.8) | 81 (15.6) | 73 (14.0) | 278 (53.5) | 242 (46.5) |
The way company policies are put into practice | 45 (8.7) | 216 (41.5) | 119 (22.9) | 90 (17.3) | 50 (9.6) | 259 (49.8) | 261 (50.2) |
My pay and the amount of work I do | 154 (29.6) | 86 (16.5) | 115 (22.1) | 131 (25.2) | 34 (6.5) | 280 (53.8) | 240 (46.2) |
The chances for advancement on this job | 120 (23.1) | 102 (19.6) | 119 (22.9) | 143 (27.5) | 36 (6.9) | 298 (57.3) | 222 (42.7) |
The freedom to use my own judgment | 68 (13.1) | 165 (31.7) | 95 (18.3) | 98 (18.8) | 94 (18.1) | 287 (55.2) | 233 (44.8) |
The chance to try my own methods of doing the job | 46 (8.8) | 202 (38.8) | 100 (19.2) | 87 (16.7) | 85 (16.3) | 272 (52.3) | 248 (47.7) |
The working condition | 40 (7.7) | 228 (43.8) | 77 (14.8) | 61 (11.7) | 114 (21.9) | 252 (48.5) | 268 (51.5) |
The way my coworkers get along with each other | 30 (5.8) | 241 (46.3) | 107 (20.6) | 58 (11.2) | 84 (16.2) | 249 (47.9) | 271 (52.1) |
The praise I get for doing a good job | 86 (16.5) | 85 (16.3) | 166 (31.9) | 118 (22.7) | 65 (12.5) | 349 (67.1) | 171 (32.9) |
The feeling of accomplishment I get from the job | 32 (6.2) | 195 (37.5) | 73 (14.0) | 61 (11.7) | 159 (30.6) | 293 (56.3) | 227 (43.7) |
Magnitude of job satisfaction in private hospitals | 212 (81.2) | 49 (18.8) | |||||
Magnitude of job satisfaction in public hospitals | 75 (29.0) | 184 (71.0) | |||||
Overall magnitude of job satisfaction | 287 (55.2) | 233 (44.8) |
NB: VD: very dissatisfied; D: dissatisfied; N: neutral; S: satisfied; VS: very satisfied; n : number of participants.
The multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, performance appraisal, reward and recognition, and normative commitment were significant variables for job satisfaction in public hospitals. Respondents aged greater than or equal to 30 years were 13 times more satisfied (AOR: 13.06; 95% CI: 4.83, 35.34) compared to respondents aged less than 30 years. Healthcare professionals who agree with the performance appraisal practice were 86% less likely to be satisfied than those who disagree with the performance appraisal practice (AOR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.63). Healthcare professionals who got good rewards and recognition were 4.09 times more likely to be satisfied compared to those who did not get good rewards and recognition (AOR: 4.9; 95% CI: 1.17, 14.29). Study participants with high normative commitment were 3.14 times more likely to be satisfied than those with low normative commitment (AOR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.30, 7.61) ( Table 4 ).
Bivariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with job satisfaction, public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city, 2020 ( N = 261).
Variables | Private hospitals ( = 261) | Public hospitals ( = 259) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Job satisfaction | Job satisfaction | ||||||||
Satisfied (%) | Dissatisfied (%) | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | Satisfied (%) | Dissatisfied (%) | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
Age | 20-29 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 67 | 75 | 1 | 1 |
≥30 | 8 | 109 | 12.17 (5.51, 26.85) | 13.06 (4.83, 35.34) | |||||
Educational level | Diploma | 69 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 55 | 1 | 1 |
Degree | 120 | 16 | 2.75 (1.41, 5.33) | 2.40 (0.96, 5.97) | 50 | 120 | 1.32 (0.70, 2.45) | 1.43 (0.66, 3.10) | |
Above degree | 21 | 10 | 2.70 (0.74, 9.85) | 0.84 (0.08, 8.27) | 7 | 9 | 2.29 (0.46, 11.25) | 2.24 (0.22, 22.82) | |
Monthly salary | <3653 | 67 | 17 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
3653-5294 | 70 | 19 | 0.93 (0.44, 1.95) | 1.35 (0.43, 4.19) | |||||
5295-7111 | 18 | 7 | 0.65 (0.23, 1.81) | 0.24 (0.05, 1.06) | |||||
>7111 | 57 | 6 | 2.41 (0.88, 6.53) | 1.11 (0.30, 3.99) | |||||
Job description | Yes | 203 | 39 | 5.78 (2.20, 15.18) | 5.59 (1.28, 24.31) | 68 | 135 | 3.52 (1.51, 8.21) | 2.04 (0.71, 5.86) |
No | 9 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 49 | 1 | 1 | |
Short-term training | Yes | 153 | 27 | 2.11 (1.11, 4.00) | 0.68 (0.18, 2.54) | 54 | 108 | 1.80 (1.01, 3.24) | 0.69 (0.27, 1.74) |
No | 59 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 76 | 1 | 1 | |
Nature of work | Pleasant | 49 | 34 | 0.36 (0.25, 0.51) | 0.29 (0.10, 0.85) | 36 | 136 | 0.57 (0.43, 0.75) | 1.01 (0.43, 2.39) |
Unpleasant | 163 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 48 | 1 | 1 | |
Responsibility | Yes | 170 | 21 | 5.39 (2.78, 10.44) | 2.21 (0.80, 6.05) | 59 | 102 | 2.96 (1.58, 5.54) | 1.11 (0.43, 2.89) |
No | 42 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 82 | 1 | 1 | |
Work environment | Safe | 174 | 24 | 4.76 (2.45, 9.24) | 0.64 (0.20, 2.00) | 43 | 69 | 2.23 (1.29, 3.87) | 1.25 (0.52, 3.00) |
Unsafe | 38 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 115 | 1 | 1 | |
Coworker relationship | Good | 192 | 37 | 3.11 (1.40, 6.92) | 0.84 (0.24, 2.85) | 56 | 120 | 1.57 (0.85, 2.87) | 0.44 (0.16, 1.21) |
Poor | 20 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 64 | 1 | 1 | |
Autonomy | Yes | 167 | 17 | 6.98 (3.55, 13.72) | 3.00 (1.01, 8.95) | 54 | 78 | 3.49 (1.94, 6.26) | 1.70 (0.70, 4.10) |
No | 45 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 106 | 1 | 1 | |
Pay and benefit | Fair | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 28 | 1.63 (0.83, 3.20) | 0.90 (0.32, 2.51) |
Unfair | 58 | 156 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Organizational policy and strategy | Comfortable | 136 | 16 | 3.69 (1.90, 7.14) | 0.46 (0.14, 1.44) | 29 | 25 | 4.00 (2.13, 7.51) | 1.42 (0.58, 3.49) |
Uncomfortable | 76 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 159 | 1 | 1 | |
Performance appraisal | Yes | 40 | 7 | 5.46 (1.27, 23.51) | 3.76 (0.88, 15.91) | 21 | 35 | 1.65 (0.88, 3.09) | 0.24 (0.09, 0.63) |
No | 172 | 42 | 1 | 1 | 54 | 149 | 1 | 1 | |
Supportive supervision | Adequate | 153 | 13 | 7.18 (3.55, 14.50) | 2.36 (0.75, 7.38) | 44 | 42 | 4.79 (2.69, 8.53) | 2.31 (0.89, 5.95) |
Inadequate | 59 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 142 | 1 | 1 | |
Education opportunity | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 23 | 2.05 (1.02, 4.11) | 0.76 (0.24, 2.36) |
No | 58 | 161 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Reward and recognition | Yes | 54 | 8 | 5.24 (1.56, 17.58) | 4.10 (0.64, 26.02) | 19 | 12 | 4.86 (2.21, 10.65) | 4.09 (1.17, 14.29) |
No | 158 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 56 | 172 | 1 | 1 | |
Affective commitment | High | 189 | 27 | 6.69 (3.28, 13.63) | 3.01 (0.98, 9.23) | 59 | 111 | 2.42 (1.29, 4.54) | 0.92 (0.31, 2.69) |
Low | 23 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 73 | 1 | 1 | |
Normative commitment | High | 141 | 13 | 5.49 (2.73, 11.03) | 2.28 (0.68, 7.61) | 42 | 48 | 3.60 (2.05, 6.33) | 3.14 (1.30, 7.61) |
Low | 71 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 136 | 1 | 1 | |
Continuance commitment | High | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22 | 36 | 1.70 (0.92, 3.16) | 1.21 (0.55, 2.67) |
Low | 53 | 148 | 1 | 1 |
∗∗ p value < 0.01; ∗ p value < 0.05. 1 = reference category; NA: not applicable.
Job description, nature of work, and autonomy were significant variables for job satisfaction in private hospitals. Accordingly, the respondents who got clear job descriptions were 5.59 times more likely to be satisfied than their counterparts (AOR: 5.59; 95% CI: 1.28, 24.31). Healthcare professionals working in the pleasant nature of work were 71% less likely to be satisfied than those working in unpleasant work (AOR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.85). Healthcare professionals who had autonomy in decision-making were 3.0 times more likely to be satisfied compared to their counterparts (AOR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.01, 8.95) ( Table 4 ).
In the final multivariable logistic regression analysis model, workplace work, job description, nature of work, autonomy, supportive supervision, reward and recognition, and normative commitment were factors associated with overall job satisfaction ( p < 0.05). Subsequently, health professionals working in private hospitals were 8.89 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who work in public hospitals (AOR: 8.89; 95% CI: 5.14, 15.35).
Healthcare professionals working in the pleasant nature of work were 1.82 times more likely to be satisfied than those working in the unpleasant nature of work (AOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.15). Study participants who had autonomy for decision-making were 2.37 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who had no autonomy for decision-making (AOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.29, 4.33). Respondents who got adequate integrated supportive supervision were 2.42 times more likely to be satisfied with their job compared to those who did not get adequate supervision (AOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.33, 4.40).
Healthcare professionals who got good rewards and recognition were 3.04 times more likely to be satisfied compared to those who did not get good rewards and recognition (AOR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.37, 6.75). Study participants with high normative commitment were 2.57 times more likely to be satisfied than those with low normative commitment (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.48, 4.43) ( Table 5 ).
Bivariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with overall job satisfaction, hospitals in Bahir Dar city, 2020 ( N = 520).
Variables | Job satisfaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfied (%) | Dissatisfied (%) | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
Work place | Public hospital | 75 | 184 | 1 | 1 |
Private hospital | 212 | 49 | 10.61 (7.03, 16.01) | 8.89 (5.14, 15.35) | |
Job description | Yes | 271 | 174 | 5.74 (3.19, 10.30) | 2.31 (0.90, 3.90) |
No | 16 | 59 | 1 | 1 | |
Short-term training | Yes | 207 | 135 | 1.87 (1.30, 2.71) | 0.65 (0.34, 1.21) |
No | 80 | 98 | 1 | 1 | |
Annual leave | Yes | 197 | 136 | 1.56 (1.08, 2.23) | 0.79 (0.45, 1.40) |
No | 90 | 97 | 1 | 1 | |
Nature of work | Pleasant | 202 | 63 | 6.41 (4.36, 9.42) | 1.82 (1.05, 3.15) |
Unpleasant | 85 | 170 | 1 | 1 | |
Work environment | Safe | 217 | 83 | 4.66 (3.20, 6.79) | 0.91 (0.49, 1.69) |
Unsafe | 70 | 140 | 1 | 1 | |
Coworker relationship | Good | 248 | 257 | 3.07 (1.99, 4.75) | 0.71 (0.36, 1.37) |
Poor | 39 | 76 | 1 | 1 | |
Autonomy | Yes | 221 | 95 | 4.86 (3.32, 7.11) | 2.37 (1.29, 4.33) |
No | 66 | 138 | 1 | 1 | |
Organizational policy and strategy | Comfortable | 165 | 41 | 6.33 (4.19, 9.55) | 0.86 (0.45, 1.64) |
Uncomfortable | 122 | 192 | 1 | 1 | |
Performance appraisal | Yes | 61 | 37 | 1.42 (0.91, 2.24) | 0.78 (0.42, 1.45) |
No | 226 | 196 | 1 | 1 | |
Supportive supervision | Adequate | 197 | 55 | 7.08 (4.78, 10.48) | 2.42 (1.33, 4.40) |
Inadequate | 90 | 178 | 1 | 1 | |
Reward and recognition | Yes | 73 | 15 | 4.95 (2.75, 8.91) | 3.04 (1.37, 6.75) |
No | 214 | 218 | 1 | 1 | |
Affective commitment | High | 248 | 138 | 4.37 (2.85, 6.71) | 1.62 (0.85, 3.09) |
Low | 39 | 95 | 1 | 1 | |
Normative commitment | High | 183 | 61 | 4.96 (3.39, 7.24) | 2.57 (1.48, 4.43) |
Low | 104 | 172 | 1 | 1 | |
Continuance commitment | High | 135 | 61 | 2.50 (1.72, 3.63) | 0.73 (0.43, 1.24) |
Low | 152 | 172 | 1 | 1 |
∗∗ Significant at p value < 0.01; ∗ significant at p value < 0.05; 1 = reference category.
In this study, the magnitude of overall job satisfaction was found to be 55.2 (51.0, 59.4)%. The finding showed that the health professionals working at private hospitals were more satisfied 81.2% (76.6, 85.8%) than those working at public hospitals 29 (23.2, 35.1%). This discrepancy could have resulted from differences in infrastructure in the health institutions, administrative issues, socioeconomic characteristics, and healthcare workers' organizational setup.
In this study, the magnitude of overall job satisfaction was comparable with previous studies conducted among health professionals in Ethiopia, at Addis Ababa 52.9% [ 17 ], East Gojjam zone (54.2%) [ 16 ], and northwest Ethiopia (46.9%) [ 20 ]. But this finding was lower than those of studies conducted in Jimma University Specialized Hospital 60.3% [ 19 ], Nepal (76%) [ 12 ], and Nigeria (90.4%) [ 14 ]. On the other hand, it is higher than studies done among health professionals in Ghana 36.4% [ 15 ], Vietnam 41.8% [ 10 ], Pakistan 41% [ 11 ], India 24.7% [ 5 ], Sri Lanka 23.7% [ 13 ], Harari region in Ethiopia 44.2% [ 6 ], western Ethiopia 41.46% [ 21 ], and Amhara region 46.9% [ 18 ]. The possible reasons for this variation might be due to the study time differences, differences in socioeconomic status, and differences in the study's geographical area.
In this study, the magnitude of job satisfaction at the public hospitals was lower than studies done in Vietnam, 41.8% [ 10 ]; Pakistan, 41% [ 11 ]; Ghana, 36.4% [ 15 ]; Harari region in Ethiopia, 44.2% [ 6 ]; Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 60.3% [ 19 ]; and Amhara region, 46.9% [ 18 ]. The magnitude of job satisfaction in private hospitals in this study was higher than in a study conducted in Nepal (76%) [ 12 ]. On the other hand, it was lower than a study conducted in Nigeria (90.4%) [ 14 ]. However, it is higher than studies done in Ethiopia [ 11 , 17 , 19 , 20 ]. Possible reasons for this variation might be the differences in infrastructure in the health institutions, study area differences, and the tools used to measure the outcome variable that might affect job satisfaction. In this study, the tools used to measure the outcome variable were the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, whereas the majority of previous studies used other tools like the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) and Satisfaction of Employees in Healthcare (SEHC).
The odds of job satisfaction were higher among healthcare professionals who work in private hospitals. This was supported by other studies conducted in China and New York [ 7 , 23 ].
Healthcare professionals working in a pleasant nature of work were more likely to be satisfied than those who are working in an unpleasant nature of work. This finding is supported by other studies carried out elsewhere [ 8 , 40 ]. This can be the fact that if employees are engaged with a kind of work and they labeled it as worthwhile, are with pride, and are able to see results, it is likely that they will be satisfied with their job. Study participants who had autonomy for decision-making were more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who had no autonomy for decision-making. This finding is congruent with other studies conducted in India and Chicago [ 3 , 26 ]. This can be explained as when employees had freedom of decision to accomplish their assigned task and chance to control scheduling of their work, they are likely to be satisfied.
Besides, in this study, health professionals who got adequate supportive supervision were more likely to be satisfied with their job as compared to those who did not get supportive supervision. This finding was consistent with a study from the western Amhara region [ 25 ]. These factors were opportunities for reward, nature of work, supervision, and benefit status of the organization [ 8 ]. Health professionals who got rewards and recognition were more likely to be satisfied with their job than those who did not get rewards and recognition. Also, those working in a pleasant nature of work were more satisfied than those who worked in the unpleasant nature of work. This finding was in line with a study conducted elsewhere [ 8 ]. Finally, healthcare professionals who reported a high normative commitment were more likely to be satisfied with their job than their counterparts. This was consistent with a study conducted elsewhere [ 41 ]. This was because if employees feel a sense of belongingness or are involved and linked emotionally with the organization, they are likely to be satisfied.
The possible limitation of the study was social desirability and a recall bias which may lead to artificially inflated variables. To minimize this effect, a self-administered questionnaire was used. Besides, variables were categorized, which may probably hide information. Furthermore, this study was not triangulated with a qualitative method.
The magnitude of job satisfaction was relatively low in both private and public hospital health professionals and severe among health professionals working in public hospitals. This study revealed that healthcare professionals' job satisfaction was relatively low in private and public hospitals and somehow severe in the public hospitals at Bahir Dar city. The pleasant nature of work, good reward and recognition system, and high affective commitment were positively associated with healthcare professional's job satisfaction at the private hospitals. Being a medical doctor and pharmacy professional, a safe work environment, and adequate supportive supervision positively influence public hospitals' job satisfaction. In light of this finding, healthcare policy-makers and hospital administrators should consider the identified factors to improve healthcare professionals' job satisfaction in private and public hospitals.
We would like to thank the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Policy, for making this thesis work by giving ethical clearance, assigning advisors, and giving financial support. We forward our appreciation to the health managers for allowing us to conduct this research and their cooperation. Finally, we would like to thank study participants for their volunteer participation and data collectors and supervisors for their genuineness and quality of work during data collection. The University of Gondar sponsored this study.
AC: | Affective commitment |
AOR: | Adjusted Odds Ratio |
BSc: | Bachelor of Science |
CC: | Continuance commitment |
CI: | Confidence interval |
COR: | Crude odds ratio |
Dr.: | Doctor |
ETB: | Ethiopian birr |
HR: | Human resource |
HWs: | Health workers |
MPH: | Master of Public Health |
NC: | Normative commitment |
NGOs: | Nongovernmental organizations |
OC: | Organizational commitment |
PhD: | Doctor of Philosophy |
SDGs: | Sustainable development goals |
SHP: | Sample health professional |
SPSS: | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
THP: | Total health professional |
WHO: | World Health Organization. |
Ethical approval.
The Institutional Ethical Review Board of the University of Gondar approved the study. Ethical clearance was obtained from the board on behalf of the public health school (Ref. No. IPH/837/2020). Upon this clearance, additional written permission to conduct the study was obtained from the manager of public and private health institutions. The human resource manager was told about the purpose of the study.
Written informed consent was obtained from participants to confirm willingness. They were notified that they have the right to refuse or terminate at any point in the interview. The extracted information was not used other than for study purposes. The extracted information was locked in a file cabinet in the researcher's position only and finally burnt.
The University of Gondar has no role in the decision to publish, manuscript preparation, and publication.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
AG designed the study, developed data collection tools, analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted the paper. GA, ED, and LY developed the study proposal, analysis, and interpretation, revised drafts of the paper, and revised the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
Evidence in the literature suggests job satisfaction can make a difference in keeping qualified workers on the job, but little research has been conducted focusing specifically on allied health faculty. In order to attract and retain top quality faculty, colleges and universities should understand the variables impacting faculty satisfaction and develop a plan to enhance satisfaction. An integrative literature review (CINHAL, ERIC, Journal of Allied Health, Chronicle of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, and current books on job satisfaction) of faculty job satisfaction and dissatisfaction produced a variety of publications presenting the key determinants of job satisfaction by allied health faculty in the United States. The purpose of the analysis was to examine the various factors that influence job satisfaction, especially by allied health faculty, in institutions of higher education in the U.S. The procedure used for this analysis consisted of reviewing allied health and higher education faculty studies to identify factors influencing job satisfaction, research questions, sample size reported, instruments used for measurement of job satisfaction, and job satisfaction results. While the theoretical models of allied health and higher education faculty job satisfaction exist separately in the literature, their remarkable similarities permit the prospect of a contemporary framework of the essential components of job satisfaction. Potential opportunities for continuing research on the personal and professional variables impacting job satisfaction of allied health faculty and similar disciplines are presented.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Employee welfare programs constitute any employer-provided perks and comforts beyond earnings and compensation. Employee welfare programs promote motivation and performance by increasing employee engagement. Policies pertaining to employee welfare are essential for inspiring employees to give their all when doing their jobs. The greatest productivity from employees can only be obtained by any business if those workers love and are dedicated to their work. Conversely, when workers' needs are met, they experience a sense of motivation. By offering social services and programs, job satisfaction can be increased. Work satisfaction is a complex notion that measures an employee's attitude and inner mental condition and aids in striking a balance between the relationship between the company and the employee. Contented employees are an organization's most precious asset, whereas disgruntled ones are essentially inconsequential. The main elements that must be taken into consideration for overall job satisfaction are the welfare program, flexible work schedule, supervisor-subordinate relationship, career advancement, work recognition, objective work environment, and relationships with colleagues. Employee welfare involves the provisions of various services, facilities and amenities for the benefit of the employees for improved standard of living. It is part of the efforts of management of an organization to meet the needs of their workforce to improve their productive capacity. Employee welfare is directed towards ensuring that the employees are happy and comfortable, to perform their tasks effectively. Employee welfare has been relevant in recent times for greater achievement of desired goals of various organizations. There is the need to provide a good working environment, staff quarters or accommodation, health care services, safety and appropriate remuneration. Failure of organizations to adequately take the welfare of their staff into consideration could lead to poor performance and low productivity. This paper adopted a qualitative research design which entailed a critical review of literature on the effect of employee welfare programs. The rationale for this design was to interrogate views, methods, and findings of authors on the relationships among study variables. Therefore, the study used secondary data obtained from journal articles, books, publications, and conference papers drawn globally. The review mainly used content analysis which were mentioned, and discussions specific to the study variables were identified, analyzed and critiqued. The findings revealed that there is a significant and positive relationship between job satisfaction and employee welfare programs. The health and well-being of their employees has been given a top priority by their companies, as seen by the comprehensive benefit plans and secure health care they offer. Employers facilitate employees' accumulation of unused sick days over the course of a year for use when necessary. Some firms even pay back their workers for sick days that aren't used. Many issues related to employee health exist, some of which are unavoidable, and they all affect both the overall performance of an organization and the productivity of its individual employees. Finally, it is imperative to note that some employers now recognize that addressing employee welfare is one way of positive and effective human resource management which is critical to organizational performance.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | IJNRD.ORG
William Carey
Employee welfare plays a crucial role in enhancing organizational performance and fostering a positive work environment. This study explores various aspects of employee welfare measures within Coromandel International Limited, focusing on factors such as safety appliances, medical facilities, first aid services, canteen facilities, and education provisions for employee children. The research methodology involved both primary and secondary data collection, with a sample size of 100 respondents using simple random sampling techniques. Data analysis revealed high satisfaction rates among employees for medical facilities and safety appliances, while suggestions for improvement were identified in areas such as maintenance, post-retirement benefits, and education facilities. The study concludes that Coromandel International Limited demonstrates a strong commitment to employee welfare, with room for enhancements identified to further elevate employee satisfaction and organizational performance. Additionally, a comprehensive bibliography is provided, encompassing a range of scholarly sources on employee welfare and related topics, offering valuable insights for further research in this area.
International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology
Chandra Sekhar Patro
Employees' play a key role in the existence and growth of any organisation, therefore their welfare is essential. During the past few years, both public sector and private sector organisations have been contributing towards the employee's benefits and also increase their efficiency. Employees' welfare facilities include housing facilities, free medical facilities, retirement benefits, children and adult educational benefits, welfare measures for the employee's families, loan facilities, etc. If the organisations do not bother about the employees benefit, but expect efficient and high performance from them, it is a mere waste. So there is utmost need for the employee's welfare in any type of organisation. Organizations have to provide welfare facilities to their employees to keep their motivation levels high. A comparative study was undertaken to know the satisfaction level of the employees on the enforceability of various welfare measures in both the public and p...
IOSR Journals
Lot of changes has taken place recently with regards to employee welfare measures. Completely new methods in the way of operations of organizations could be one of the significant reasons for the same. These resulted in the off shoot of many new jobs. In this study, an attempt has been made to understand about the welfare measures being provided to employees doing contemporary jobs such as Content review processor, Candidate Relationship manager, Electronic relationship manager. Various contemporary welfare measures like psychological counseling centers, food courts, sports & entertainment facilities, transportation are being practiced by the organizations in addition to traditional employee welfare measures like PF, Gratuity, ESI etc., These welfare measures contribute a lot for the prosperity of the employees and employers.
shukri bakar
Employees’ welfare includes anything that is done for the comfort and improvement of employees and is provided over and above the wages.Welfare helps in keeping the morale and motivation of the employees high so as to retain the employees for longer duration.The welfare measures need not be in monetary terms only but in any kind/forms. Employee welfare includes monitoring of working conditions, creation of industrial harmony through infrastructure for health, industrial relations and insurance against disease, accident and unemployment for the workers and their families.
Advances in Management
Dr.Nanjundeswaraswamy T S
Employee Retention and Absenteeism are the major challenges for any organization in the current competitive world. Retaining of talents is possible through the effective implementation of Quality of Work Life (QWL) drives. Employee welfare measure is one among the QWL drive. A sample of 50 employee's responses were considered for the study and the data was analyzed using K-S Single sample Test and K-S Two-Sample Test conducted to check the stated Hypothesis and Regression analysis. Structural Equation Modeling was designed.
European Journal of Marketing and Management Sciences Eur.
Bright King
This study focused on the implications of labour welfare schemes on employee job satisfaction. The specific objectives are to: to ascertain the effect of worker's compensation on employee commitment and to assess the effect of staff recreational welfare on employee performance. The population of the study comprised 192 staff of selected banks in Enugu metropolis, Enugu State while Taro Yamane formula was used to determined the sample size of 130. The data was analysed with simple percentage analysis while all the hypotheses were tested with Simple Linear regression at 0.05 alpha level. The research made the following findings: that worker's compensation had significant positive effect on employee commitment (β =.896; t=.8.239; p>0.05) and that staff recreational welfare had significant positive effect on employee performance (β =.559; t=9.729; p<0.05). The study concluded that staff welfare is essential in creating a sense of recognition and satisfaction among the employees which improves employee job satisfaction. It was recommended among others; that human resources manager should develop systems that will ensure that there is a proper compensation plan entailing proper job evaluation processes and pay structures in the organization. This is to ensure that employees are equal pay what they deserved as a result of their input. To enhance job satisfaction among employees, organizations should offer recreation facilities and activities that are of interest to employees bearing in mind their different tastes, gender, age and among others. This will encourage the employees to engage in recreation activities that they enjoy most.
Dr Pravin V Yadav
The present study is an attempt to identify the statutory and non-statutory Labour Welfare Measures (LWM) adopted by different industries and its relationship between employee satisfactions and workplace. This paper stated a comprehensive review of various studies conducted by experts and researchers of all over the globe on Labour Welfare Measures (LWM) and it's determinants and its' relationship between employee satisfactions at workplace. The paper sought to present the summary of work done by different researchers in the field of labour welfare.
Mark Angelo
The present study is made an attempt to identify the employee welfare measures adopted in IT industry. Employee welfare means anything done for the comfort and improvement of the employees over and above the wages paid which is not a necessity of the industry. The basic purpose of employee welfare is to enrich the life of employees and keep them happy. Employees spend at least half their time at work or getting to it, or leaving it. They know that they contribute to the organization when they are reasonably free from worry and they feel that when they are in trouble/ problems, they are due to get something back from the organization. People are entitled to be treated as full human beings with personal needs, hopes and anxieties.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Ogungbayo Olufunmi
International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH
JOYJIT SANYAL
Ranjita Ekka
ufoma ijeoma
Drishtikon: A Management Journal
Publishing India Group
Indian Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine
Mridul Mishra
IAEME Publication
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation
Buddhika Suraweera
grace munisi
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
VARADAHU ARAVAMUDHAN
SAMRIDDHI : A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology
Dr.(Prof.) Kiran S Kakade
sulthan mohideen
Indus Foundation International Journals UGC Approved
MASTER IN SOCIAL WORK THESIS, UNIBADAN
Sulaimon Is-haq
jejji chanti
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Neela Venkatesh
Ahovi Godfred
Employee Assistance Quarterly
Rick Csiernik
LASU Journal of Employment Relations & Human Resource Management
Olaniyi Dunmade
IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267)
monoshree mahanta
m jagadeesan
Gordon Spence
Journal ijmr.net.in(UGC Approved)
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Factors affecting the indoor air quality and occupants’ thermal comfort in urban agglomeration regions in the hot and humid climate of pakistan.
Novelty of the study, 2. literature review, 2.1. outdoor and indoor air quality, 2.2. air conditioning systems, 2.2.1. acs with high-efficiency particulate air (hepa) filters, 2.2.2. acs with multi-stage filtration systems, 2.2.3. acs with activated carbon filter, 2.3. indoor air quality assessment, 3. materials and methods, 3.1. site description, 3.2. conceptual framework, 3.3. tool and database, 3.4. data acquisition, 3.5. data mining, 4. analysis and results, 4.1. adaptive thermal comfort, 4.2. obtained datasets from ashrae global thermal comfort database ii, 4.3. thermal comfort assessment, 5. discussion, 5.1. climate change and its impact on thermal comfort, 5.2. limitations, 5.3. future recommendations, 5.4. contribution to the knowledge, 6. conclusions, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest, abbreviations.
IAQ | Indoor air quality |
EPA | Environmental Protection Agency of Pakistan |
WHO | World Health Organization |
MVS | Mechanical ventilation systems |
NVS | Natural ventilation systems |
PAC | Portable air cleaners |
AC | Air conditioners |
HEPA | High-efficiency particulate air |
UTCI | Universal Thermal Climate Index |
PMV | Predicted mean vote |
Click here to enlarge figure
City | Annual Average Concentration of PM |
---|---|
Lahore | 107.5 µg/m |
Faisalabad | 104.6 µg/m |
Gujranwala | 102.9 µg/m |
Rawalpindi | 98.6 µg/m |
Karachi | 74.9 µg/m |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 0.62–3.61 µg/m |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 0.74–4.30 µg/m |
Total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) | 84.17–306.32 µg/m |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 2.04–34.86 µg/m |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 1.14–15.76 µg/m |
Total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) | 206.99–589.71 µg/m |
Type of PTE | Concentration |
---|---|
Zn | 17.32 ng/m |
Fe | 14.49 ng/m |
Mn | 7.40 ng/m |
Rank Order: Zn (17.32 ng/m ) > Fe (14.49 ng/m ) > Mn (7.40 ng/m ) |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 119.4 ± 30.9 µg/m |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 85.2 ± 25.8 µg/m |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 1.6 ± 0.8 ppm |
Carbon dioxide (CO ) | 692.4 ± 144.6 ppm |
Particulate matter (PM ) | 98.8 ± 21.8 µg/m |
Particulate Matter (PM ) | 67.8 ± 14.9 µg/m |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 0.5 ± 0.5 ppm |
Carbon dioxide (CO ) | 558.2 ± 66.2 ppm |
Method | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Air Conditioning System |
Particle Type | Size |
---|---|
Smoke | 0.01–1 micron |
Dust | 0.05–100 microns |
Bacteria | 0.35–10 microns |
Dust mite debris | 0.5–50 microns |
Spores from plants | 6–100 microns |
Human hair | 70–100 microns |
Mold | 20–200 microns |
Project Name | Low-Energy Occupant-Responsive HVAC Controls and Systems |
---|---|
Project Objective | To devise, incorporate, and exhibit HVAC control and personal comfort system (PCS) technologies, along with plausible stages for implementation. |
Technologies Developed | |
Key Innovations | |
Results | |
Significance to Industry | A capability to achieve a 39% reduction in natural gas consumption and a 30% reduction in electricity consumption for HVAC systems within commercial office spaces in the state of California. |
Research Approach | |
Notable Findings | |
Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Field Study Results | |
Code Change Potential | Assessed the potential for modifications in code standards pertaining to personal comfort system (PCS) and variable air volume (VAV) controls, considering both state and national guidelines for energy efficiency and occupant comfort. |
Project Name | Low-Cost MEMS-Based Ultrasonic Airflow Sensors for Rooms and HVAC Systems |
---|---|
Project Objective | To create cost-effective, precise, and space-efficient airflow sensors designed for the measurement of air velocities within rooms and volumetric air flows within HVAC systems. These sensors will leverage emerging microelectromechanical system (MEMS) technologies to achieve optimal performance. |
Significance to Industry | The absence of reliable monitoring of airspeed and airflow has notable repercussions on indoor comfort, ventilation efficacy, indoor air quality, occupant well-being, and safety. Additionally, it directly affects a significant portion of HVAC energy consumption, accounting for approximately 11% of California’s total energy utilization. |
Research Approach | Experts from academia and industry are collaborating to create advanced ultrasonic airspeed sensors. These sensors will utilize novel MEMS technologies derived from 3D rangefinding, ensuring cost-effective production, long battery life, and wireless communication. The consortium will share design data, performance metrics, and control algorithms, validated through lab experiments and field trials. |
Problem Statement | Present airspeed sensors are characterized by high costs, susceptibility to damage, and limited integration capabilities. Moreover, prevailing techniques employed for airflow measurement lack precision and accuracy. |
Objective Definition | Create cost-effective, precise, and wireless microelectromechanical system (MEMS) airflow sensors tailored for room and HVAC system applications. |
Technology Development | Utilizing emerging MEMS technologies to develop groundbreaking ultrasonic airflow sensors renowned for their exceptional accuracy. |
Hardware Design | Architect sensor variants for both room-mounted and duct-mounted configurations, featuring autonomous orientation capabilities and minimal intrusion into airstreams. |
Testing and Validation | Conducting rigorous testing of the sensors in both controlled laboratory settings and real-world field environments to assess their accuracy, performance, and energy efficiency. |
Documentation | Disseminating comprehensive design data, specifications, control sequences, and associated advantages through research findings and publications. |
Disruptive Innovation | Innovative ultrasonic MEMS sensors are reshaping the market landscape by offering a compelling combination of affordability and exceptional accuracy. |
Energy Efficiency | Enhanced monitoring capabilities contribute to heightened airflow control, resulting in reduced energy consumption. |
Comfort and Health | Elevated indoor comfort, ventilation efficacy, air quality, and occupant well-being. |
Industry Adoption | Initiating market momentum for sensor manufacturers through documented advantages. |
Standards Influence | Direct research outcomes towards energy and environmental standards committees such as ASHRAE and Title-24. |
Pros of Conceptual Framework | Cons of Conceptual Framework |
---|---|
Comprehensive approach: The comprehensive approach of this conceptual framework considers various factors related to IAQ in a range of building types, such as offices, houses, and classrooms. This wider scope allows the framework to be utilized effectively in diverse settings. | Limited consideration of specific building types: While the framework includes offices, houses, and classrooms, it may not cover all conceivable building types, potentially limiting its applicability in specific contexts. |
Data analysis: Obtaining and analyzing datasets from both CLIMA and ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II adds a quantitative dimension to the research. This allows for the objective assessment and comparison of IAQ. | Possible lack of comprehensive data: The presence of inadequate or incomplete data, depending on its availability and quality, poses a risk that the research analysis may lack accuracy and reliability. |
Utilization of tools and databases: This research uses the CLIMA Tool and the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. The utilization of specialized tools and databases enhances the accuracy and reliability of the analysis. | Possible bias towards certain methods: The research reliance on specific tools or databases, such as the CLIMA Tool or ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II, and using air conditioning systems as a method, may limit the consideration of alternative methodologies. |
Potential for recommendations: Utilization of both tools and databases includes a dedicated step for offering recommendations and suggestions. This showcases the research’s practicality as it provides actionable insights for improving IAQ. | Lack of consideration for external factors: This research primarily focuses on IAQ; it may not adequately address external factors that can impact IAQ, such as outdoor pollution sources or ventilation systems. |
Month | Mean (°C) | Std (°C) | Min (°C) | 1% (°C) | 25% (°C) | 50% (°C) | 75% (°C) | 99% (°C) | Max (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan | 11.35 | 4.68 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 21 | 22 |
Feb | 15.71 | 5.25 | 6.1 | 6.67 | 11.88 | 15.55 | 19.82 | 25.73 | 26.6 |
Mar | 21.44 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 26 | 31 | 32 |
Apr | 27.54 | 5.04 | 17 | 18 | 23.9 | 27 | 32 | 38 | 39 |
May | 32.48 | 5.28 | 21 | 22 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 43 | 44 |
Jun | 33.03 | 5.35 | 19 | 22 | 29 | 33 | 37 | 44 | 45 |
Jul | 31.34 | 3.35 | 23 | 25 | 29 | 31 | 33.5 | 40 | 41 |
Aug | 30.53 | 3.24 | 23 | 24 | 28 | 30 | 33 | 38 | 38 |
Sep | 29.2 | 3.52 | 20 | 22.6 | 26 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 37 |
Oct | 25.42 | 5.07 | 15 | 15.22 | 22 | 25 | 29 | 36 | 36 |
Nov | 19.84 | 4.83 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 19.9 | 24 | 30 | 31 |
Dec | 13.38 | 4.99 | 2 | 3.72 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 24 | 25 |
Year | 24.31 | 8.76 | 1 | 5 | 17.9 | 26 | 31 | 41 | 45 |
Variable Name | Mean | Median | Mode | Std. Deviation | Minimum | Maximum | Percentiles | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25th | 50th | 75th | |||||||
Indoor Dew point temperature (DEW) (°C) | 21.48 | 21.90 | 20.20 | 3.36021 | 11.40 | 32.40 | 20.20 | 21.90 | 23.40 |
Indoor relative humidity (%) | 57.83 | 59.95 | 56.10 | 8.75611 | 31.10 | 75.00 | 52.15 | 59.95 | 63.27 |
Operative air temperature (°C) | 30.59 | 31.10 | 31.50 | 1.76860 | 25.40 | 34.10 | 29.52 | 31.10 | 31.80 |
Solar radiation (°C) | 33.64 | 32.90 | 32.90 | 2.35445 | 29.10 | 39.80 | 32.10 | 32.90 | 34.80 |
Indoor Wet bulb temperature (WET) (°C) | 24.12 | 24.60 | 18.70 | 2.18689 | 18.70 | 31.00 | 23.00 | 24.60 | 25.57 |
Indoor wet bulb ground temperature (°C) | 26.12 | 26.60 | 26.80 | 2.03956 | 21.00 | 30.70 | 25.02 | 26.60 | 27.40 |
Outdoor heat stress index (°C) | 36.70 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 2.33766 | 33.00 | 43.00 | 35.00 | 36.00 | 38.00 |
Outdoor relative humidity (%) | 59.16 | 59.00 | 57.00 | 11.76264 | 19.60 | 78.00 | 54.00 | 59.00 | 67.00 |
Outdoor air temperature (°C) | 32.11 | 32.00 | 34.00 | 2.17015 | 23.70 | 36.00 | 30.25 | 32.00 | 34.00 |
Outdoor DEW (°C) | 22.82 | 23.00 | 23.00 | 2.21538 | 13.00 | 26.00 | 22.00 | 23.00 | 24.00 |
Indoor temperature ground (°C) | 31.23 | 31.35 | 31.80 | 3.42791 | 24.70 | 60.20 | 29.80 | 31.35 | 32.20 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Haroon, M.U.; Ozarisoy, B.; Altan, H. Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869
Haroon MU, Ozarisoy B, Altan H. Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869
Haroon, Muhammad Usama, Bertug Ozarisoy, and Hasim Altan. 2024. "Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Discover the world's research
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Job satisfaction discusses the extent to which employees are satisfied or dissatisfied with their jobs are caused by several factors that motivate them. This study aims to dig deeper into job ...
Smith et al. (1969) defined job satisfaction as the feeling an individual has about his or her job. To him, job satisfaction could be measured in terms of pay, work itself, promotions, supervision, and coworkers. Locke (1976) defined job satisfaction as an emotional-affective response to a job or specific aspects of the job. Locke
This systematic literature review provides an up-to-date overview of job satisfaction and employee relations. In analysing 24 published articles, it was found that the main factors influencing job ...
The results showed that motivational factors influenced job satisfaction in the past, whereas hygiene factors influenced job satisfaction in the present. Prasad Kotni and Karumuri (2018) used the two-factor theory to analyze the job satisfaction of 150 current employees working in retail sales. The results showed that hygiene factors had a more ...
A literature review conducted pre-COVID on work environment and job satisfaction revealed several factors that support a healthy work environment. Nurse leaders can use this information to inform decisions that will shape the future of health care today by creating work environments that support staff well-being and increase employee engagement ...
Work satisfaction is a major factor in nurse retention and the delivery of high quality care, but rapid changes in healthcare services have placed more demands on nurses and this has increased the need for organisations to consider ways to sustain and improve nurses' job satisfaction. To achieve this, they need to understand the factors that ...
1. Introduction. Job satisfaction has been defined as a "pleasurable or positive emotional state, resulting from the appraisal of one's job experiences" [].Job satisfaction reflects on overall life quality involving social relationships, family connection and perceived health status, affecting job performances, work absenteeism and job turnover, leading, in some cases, to serious ...
JOB SATISFACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE VOL. 3 ISSUE 4 (2011) PP: 77-86 81 Management Research and Practice Volume 3, Issue 4 / December 2011 ISSN 2067- 2462 mrp.ase.ro 2. FACTORS OF JOB SATISFACTION Job satisfaction is under the influence of a series of factors such as:The nature of work, Salary, Advancement
JOB SATISFACTION, A LITERATURE REVIEW. Brikend AZIRI. Faculty of Business and Economics, South East European University, I lindenska 1200, Tetovo, Makedonia. [email protected]. Abstract. Job ...
2.9.2.1 The Value of Work. Islam emphasizes the importance of work, as according to the Islamic ethics "work is. considered to be a source of independence and a means of fostering personal growth, self-respect, satisfaction and self-fulfillment...Islamic work ethic argues that life without. an obligat.
Introduction. Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from evaluating one's job or job experiences. However, knowledge of workplace factors that either satisfy employees to keep working or dissatisfy them making them leave their jobs or working places is essential for decision-making.
This study sought to review literature on the factors that determine or influence job satisfaction. From the study it was found that job satisfaction is an ... did a research and found that the key factors affecting job satisfaction were career opportunities, job influence, team work and job challenge. According to Revenio Jr. (2016) leadership ...
Background: Globally there are mounting concerns about nurses' job satisfaction because of its pivotal role in nurse turnover and the quality of care of patients. Objectives: To identify a more comprehensive and extensive knowledge of the job satisfaction of qualified general nurses working in acute care hospitals and its associated factors drawing upon empirical literature published in the ...
Abstract. Herzberg published the two-factor theory of work motivation in 1959. The theory was. highly controversial at the time it was published, claims to be the most replicated study in this. area, and provided the foundation for numerous other theories and frameworks in human. resource development (Herzberg, 1987).
Abstract. Evidence in the literature suggests job satisfaction can make a difference in keeping qualified workers on the job, but little research has been conducted focusing specifically on allied health faculty. In order to attract and retain top quality faculty, colleges and universities should understand the variables impacting faculty ...
factors that might discourage the employees and lead to job dissatisfaction such as high stress, lack of organizational communication, lack of recognition, limited opportunity for personal and ...
The study sought to examine and compare the importance of the seven factors (see the section "Literature Review") for overall job satisfaction. A correlation study was conducted in the natural environment of the organization, with minimum interference by the researcher in the normal flow of work (Sekaran, 2003). The setting was not ...
The purpose of this paper is to review literature on the factors that influence level of job satisfaction among the workforce and its effects on performance. ... (2020) did a study to investigate the factors affecting job satisfaction amongst workers of the poultry sub-sector: a test of equity theory in the Dormaa Municipality in the Bono ...
Asyraff Hussain. Job satisfaction represents one of the most complex areas facing today's managers when it comes to managing their employees. Many studies have demonstrated an unusually large impact on the job satisfaction on the motivation of workers, while the level of motivation has an impact on productivity, and hence also on performance of ...
job satisfaction. Finding out the factors affecting the job satisfaction is the key important role for any organization according to many researchers (Okpara, Squillance and rondu, 2005). In this paper we will be trying to find out the factors affecting the employee satisfaction by doing extensive literature review.
Factors Affecting Employee Performance : A Systematic Review 151 employee satisfaction (Nadya dkk., 2022; Rahmah dkk., 2022), and build a positive reputation for the company. Employee performance is a measure of the extent to which an employee is able to fulfill his duties and responsibilities properly and effectively (Darvishmotevali & Ali, 2020).
The concept of employee turnover is widely researched though very little has been done to examine the key factors influencing it. Commercial banks are always looking for innovation on their products and services, and continuously attract the best employees in order to win more customers in this high competitive market with unrealistic targets and uncertain working environment.
Job. satisfaction is an employee's attitude toward his or her. job, which includes th e employee's feelings, perceptions, and evaluations of the job [3]. Improving employee job. satisfaction can ...
The World Air Quality Index indicates that Pakistan ranks as the third most polluted country, regarding the average (Particulate Matter) PM2.5 concentration, which is 14.2 times higher than the World Health Organization's annual air quality guideline. It is crucial to implement a program aimed at reducing PM2.5 levels in Pakistan's urban areas. This review paper highlights the importance ...
2014). There are five main aspects that measure job satisfaction, these are pay, co-workers, promotions, supervision and the nature of the work. The individuals are able to measure job ...
The aim of this article is to conduct a systematic literature review in international journals on the various theoretical factors that influence employee turnover. The literature review shows that ...