U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Biomed Res Int

Logo of bmri

Job Satisfaction and Associated Factors among Health Professionals Working at Public and Private Hospitals in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

1 Bahir Dar City Administration, Amhara National Regional State, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Gashaw Andargie Biks

2 Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Endalkachew Dellie

Lake yazachew, associated data.

All the data were included in the study, and data will be available upon a responsible request from the corresponding author.

Introduction

Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from evaluating one's job or job experiences. However, knowledge of workplace factors that either satisfy employees to keep working or dissatisfy them making them leave their jobs or working places is essential for decision-making. Thus, this study is aimed at assessing job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city, northwest Ethiopia.

An institution-based comparative cross-sectional study design was conducted from 10 February 2020 to 29 May 2020. A total of 520 health professionals were selected from public and private health facilities using stratified systematic random sampling techniques. Data were collected using structured pretested self-administered questionnaires. A binary logistic regression model with Huber-White robust standard error was fitted to identify job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at public and private hospitals. A less than 0.05 p value and an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were considered to have a statistically significant association with the outcome variable.

The overall magnitude of job satisfaction was 55.2% (95% CI: 51.0, 59.4%). At public and private hospitals, the provider's satisfaction was 29.0% (95% CI: 23.2, 35.1%) and 81.23% (95% CI: 76.6, 85.8%), respectively. Working at private hospital (AOR: 8.89; 95% CI: 5.14, 15.35), pleasant nature of work (AOR:  1.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.15), autonomy (AOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.29, 4.33), adequate supportive supervision (AOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.33, 4.40), good reward and recognition (AOR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.37, 6.75), and high normative commitment (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.48, 4.43) were factors affecting the overall job satisfaction of health professionals.

Conclusions

The magnitude of job satisfaction was relatively low in private and public hospital health professionals and severe among health professionals working in public hospitals. Healthcare policy-makers and hospital managers need to develop and institutionalize evidence-based satisfaction strategies considering the predictors of health professional's job satisfaction.

1. Introduction

The Ethiopian healthcare system promotes public-private partnerships to ensure equity and quality of healthcare delivery. The public sector is composed of government health organizations that primarily serve the poor segment of the population. In contrast, the private sector is composed of private health facilities for-profit and serves the population segment who can afford out-of-pocket payment [ 1 ]. To ensure equity and quality of healthcare provided, availability and accessibility of highly committed and well-performing healthcare professionals are paramount [ 1 – 3 ]. Consequently, healthcare professionals' job satisfaction is a fundamental issue in improving access and quality healthcare for the population [ 4 ]. Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from evaluating one's job or job experiences [ 3 , 5 ].

The job satisfaction of healthcare professionals is highly important in building up employee interest and efficiency. Higher job satisfaction determines better employee performance and a higher level of patient satisfaction ultimately to gain competitive advantage and greater productivity of the organization [ 4 , 6 ]. Researchers found that employees satisfied with their job prefer to stay with their employers [ 7 ].

However, various findings showed that job satisfaction among health workers is low [ 8 , 9 ]. In Asian countries, various cross-sectional studies reported the level of job satisfaction as Vietnam 41.8% [ 10 ], Pakistan 41% [ 11 ], Nepal 76% [ 12 ], and Sri Lanka 23.7% [ 13 ]. Similarly, studies in Africa reported the peak level of job satisfaction owned by Nigeria (90.4%) [ 14 ] and the least being in Ghana (36.4%) [ 15 ]. In Ethiopia, numerous studies showed that the magnitude of job satisfaction stretched from 41.46% in western Ethiopia to 60.3% in Jimma [ 6 , 16 – 21 ].

Several studies showed a significant and positive relationship between demographic factors such as age, working experience, profession, level of education, and gross monthly salary with job satisfaction [ 4 , 22 ]. According to the level of education, job satisfaction levels of healthcare staff with high school and technical school degrees were lower than healthcare staff with university degrees and master's and above degrees. Specialist doctors, practitioner doctors, and health officers tended to show greater job satisfaction than nurses [ 23 ].

According to different studies, opportunities for reward, nature of work, supervision, relations, contact with colleagues, training, and benefit status of the organization were factors affecting employees' job satisfaction [ 8 , 24 , 25 ]. Employees feel satisfied in organizations that allow them to participate in decision-making processes, improve their skills and knowledge, and enhance work autonomy [ 3 ], whereas too many working hours, administrative burdens, heavy workload, lack of time, poor performance evaluation system, and lack of recognition were factors identified as decreasing job satisfaction [ 26 – 28 ].

Employee job satisfaction is also influenced by working space and responsibility, opportunity to develop, staff relations [ 4 , 29 ], quality of the working environment, and organizational commitment [ 30 ]. In particular, a study done in the United States hypothesized that “organizational commitment is directly related to job satisfaction,” and the study results confirmed that job satisfaction was strongly interrelated and associated with organizational commitment in a study done in Iran [ 31 , 32 ].

Similarly, previous researchers found that health workers in Ethiopia tend to be unsatisfied with many aspects of their job, for instance, training opportunities, decision-making autonomy, poor working environment, and their chances of promotion [ 33 – 36 ].

Furthermore, there are limited studies on job satisfaction and associated factors in the study area as to our search. Besides, no comparative study is conducted at all in the study area.

Therefore, this study is aimed at assessing job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city, northwest Ethiopia.

Thus, this study will let managers better understand the underlying issues to implement strategies to improve health organization policy and principles.

2.1. Study Design and Settings

A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from 10 February 2020 to 29 May 2020 to assess job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city. Bahir Dar city is the Amhara National Regional State's capital city, Ethiopia, located 565 km from Addis Ababa to the northwest. Based on Ethiopia's 2007 Central Statistical Agency (CSA) report, Bahir Dar city had 339683 [ 37 ]. The city had been divided into six subcities and 24 kebeles (the smallest administrative units in Ethiopia). The city has three public hospitals, ten public health centers, four private hospitals, and thirty private clinics. According to the Amhara National Regional State health bureau performance report of 2019, there were 1653 and 504 health professionals in public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city who provide services [ 37 ]. Information obtained from these hospitals' administrative offices provides different outpatient, inpatient, and operation room theatre services.

3. Population and Sampling

This study's source population was all health professionals working at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city. Likewise, all health professionals who were working for at least six months at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city during the study period were the study populations. Contract and voluntary employees were excluded from the study.

The sample size for the proportion of job satisfaction was determined using a double population proportion formula. An assumption of 95% confidence level, 80% power, P1 (proportion of patient satisfaction at public hospitals) 31.7% [ 25 ], P2 (proportion of patient satisfaction at a private hospital) 50%, and 10% nonresponse rate was considered. The final sample size for n1 (for public hospitals) = 271 and n2 (for private hospitals) = 271 yielded a total of 542.

The participants were identified by using a systematic sampling technique. The list of health workers was taken from payroll in the human resource management department.

3.1. Variables and Measurement

3.1.1. health professional.

A health professional is anyone who has earned a diploma and/or bachelor's degree or higher in health science from an accredited college or university.

The dependent variable for this study was job satisfaction. It was measured by a five-point Likert scale (1: very dissatisfied to 5: very satisfied) of 20 items. Respondents who scored 60% and above the sum of the satisfaction scales were considered satisfied [ 38 ].

3.1.2. Organizational Commitment

Organization commitment is a health professional's degree of attachment towards their employer. Three dimension scales measured it; a score with more than 60% of the commitment scales' sum represented a high organizational commitment [ 39 ].

Affective commitment is a health professional's attitude regarding the alignment of personal and organizational goals. This was measured by using three items, and a 5-point Likert scale scored each item from one, denoting “strongly disagree,” to five “strongly agree.”

3.1.3. Continuance Commitment

Continuance commitment is a health professional's desire to stay with the organization in light of costs associated with leaving (i.e., seniority and pension plans). This was measured by using three items, and each was scored on a 5-point Likert scale with one denoting “strongly disagree” and five representing “strongly agree.”

3.1.4. Normative Commitment

Normative commitment is a health professional's decision to stay with an organization because he or she feels obligated. This was measured using three items; each was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with one denoting strongly disagree and five strongly agree.

3.1.5. Work Environment

Work environment describes the quality of the working environment, both its physical attributes and the degree to which it provides meaningful work. It was measured by using four items; each was scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.6. Supervisor Support

Supervisor support describes the supervisors' responsibility both in preventing and in solving employee problems. It was measured by using ten items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.7. Recognition and Reward

Recognition and reward describe employee perception about the way they are encouraged. It was measured by 5-point Likert scale questions with one denoted very disagree and five very agree.

3.1.8. Coworker Relationship

Coworker relationship describes the participants' interpersonal relationships within their workplace. It was measured by using four items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.9. Pay and Benefit

Pay and benefit describe employees' expectations of fairness and adequate compensation on a day's pay for a day's work. It was measured by using four items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.10. Educational Opportunity

Educational opportunity describes the availability of advancement opportunities for employees within the organization. It was measured by using four items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.11. Organizational Policy

The organizational policy describes the way how an organization implements policy and strategy. It was measured by using four items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.12. Autonomy

Autonomy reflects participants' autonomy in initiating and continuing their work behaviors and processes, such as making decisions about work methods, pace, and effort. It was measured by using two items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.13. Performance Appraisal

Performance appraisal describes the participants feeling on the measurement of their actual performance. It was measured by using three items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.14. Nature of Work

Nature of work describes the type of work the participants do (variety, meaningfulness). It was measured using nine items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.1.15. Workload

Workload describes the participant's work requirement, the amount of time, and resources for this requirement. It was measured by using six items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

3.2. Data Collection Tools and Procedure

Data were collected using a Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) and a pretested and structured self-administered questionnaire and adopted from previously published literature [ 38 ]. The questionnaire was prepared in English and translated to Amharic, then returned to English to check its consistency. The tool's reliability for each subscale was checked using Cronbach's alpha reliability test with a score of greater than 0.83.

To ensure the data quality, two diploma nurses and one BSc public health professional were recruited as data collectors and supervisors, respectively. Also, training regarding the study objectives and data collection process was given to data collectors and supervisors for one day. Moreover, the questionnaire was pretested among 5% of the sample size in Gondar Referral Hospital. Participants were informed that the codes were used to facilitate tracking of the completeness of their respective questionnaires. The supervisors and the principal investigator were responsible for checking on the completeness of the data on-site. Incomplete questionnaires were put in offices arranged for this purpose so that participants completed their questionnaires. Furthermore, intensive supervision was done by the supervisors and principal investigators throughout the data collection period. All participants were acknowledged for their time and assistance.

3.3. Data Processing and Analysis

After the data was checked for its consistency and completeness, data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 20 for further analysis. Descriptive analysis was done for each variable in the study by running frequencies and percentages. Tables and charts were used for presenting results to give a clear picture of the magnitude and relationships of various study variables. Binary logistic regression and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the significant association between the independent and dependent variables. In the logistic regression model, an estimator with the Huber-White robust standard errors was used. Variables with a p value of less than 0.2 in the binary logistic regression analysis were candidates for multiple logistic regression analysis. Association between the independent and dependent variables was considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05 from multiple logistic regression analysis.

4.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Respondents

A total of 520 study participants were involved in this study, with a response rate of 95.9%. Two hundred fifty-nine participants with a response rate of 95.9% were from the public hospitals, and 261 respondents with a 96.3% response rate were from the private hospitals. The median age of the participants was 26 (IQR = 25-31) years. Half of the respondents were male, 260 (50%), and most of the respondents were married 318 (61.2%). Three hundred nineteen (61.3%) of the respondents had a bachelor's degree, and two hundred forty-six (47.3%) of the respondents had 1-5 years of work experience. The median monthly salary of the respondents was 5294 (IQR = 2300-22180) Ethiopian birr. Around 423 (81.3%) and 493 (94.8%) of respondents were Orthodox Christian followers and Amhara in their ethnicity, respectively.

The majority of respondents were male, 132 (51%), and more than half of the respondents were married 173 (66.8%). One hundred seventy-nine (69%) of the respondents had a bachelor's degree, and one hundred ten (42.5%) of the respondents had 6-10 years of work experience. The respondents' median monthly salary was 5294 Ethiopian birr with an interquartile range (2411-13140). The median age (IQR) of the study participants was 27 (24-30) years, ranging from 21 to 50 years, and the greatest number of study participants, 183 (70.1%), is under the age category between 20 and 29 years. The majority of respondents were female 133 (51%), and more than half of the respondents were married 145 (55.6%). One hundred forty (53.6%) of the respondents had a bachelor's degree, and one hundred forty-seven (56.3%) of the respondents had 1-5 years of work experience. The respondents' median monthly salary was 4646 Ethiopian birr with an interquartile range (3500-6700) and ranges from 2300 to 22180 ( Table 1 ).

Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents at public and private hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia ( n = 520), 2020.

VariablesPublic hospitals ( = 259)
(%)
Private hospitals ( = 261)
(%)
Total ( = 520)
(%)
Sex
 Male132 (51)128 (49)260 (50)
 Female127 (49)133 (51)260 (50)
Age
 20-29151 (58.3)183 (70.1)334 (64.2)
 30-3987 (33.6)71 (27.2)158 (30.4)
 ≥4021 (8.1)7 (2.7)28 (5.4)
Educational level
 Diploma73 (28.2)97 (37.2)170 (32.7)
 Degree179 (69.1)140 (53.6)319 (61.3)
 Above degree7 (2.7)24 (9.2)31 (6.0)
Religion
 Orthodox216 (83.4)207 (79.3)423 (81.3)
 Muslim29 (11.2)34 (13.0)63 (12.1)
 Protestant13 (5.0)19 (7.3)32 (6.2)
 Others1 (0.4)1 (0.4)2 (0.4)
Ethnicity
 Amhara238 (91.9)255 (97.7)493 (94.8)
 Oromo7 (2.7)3 (1.1)10 (1.9)
 Tigray8 (3.1)1 (0.4)9 (1.7)
 Others6 (2.3)2 (0.8)8 (1.6)
Marital status
 Married173 (66.8)145 (55.6)318 (61.2)
 Single69 (26.6)105 (40.2)174 (33.5)
 Divorced15 (5.8)10 (3.8)25 (4.8)
 Separated1 (0.4)0 (0.0)1 (0.2)
 Widowed1 (0.4)1 (0.4)2 (0.3)
Profession
 Nurse108 (40.7)102 (39.1)210 (40.4)
 Midwifery49 (18.9)27 (30.3)76 (14.6)
 Medical doctor36 (13.9)49 (18.8)85 (16.3)
 Laboratory26 (10)32 (12.3)58 (11.2)
 Pharmacy29 (11.2)39 (14.9)68 (13.1)
 Others11 (4.3)12 (4.6)33 (6.4)
Monthly salary
 <365377 (29.7)84 (32.2)161 (31.0)
 3653-529475 (29.0)89 (34.1)164 (31.5)
 5295-711168 (26.3)25 (9.6)93 (17.9)
 >711139 (15.0)63 (24.1)102 (19.6)
Work experience
 <17 (2.7)44 (16.9)51 (9.8)
 1-599 (38.2)147 (56.3)246 (47.3)
 6-10110 (42.5)54 (20.7)164 (31.5)
 >1043 (16.6)16 (6.1)59 (11.4)
Work place
 Public hospital259 (100)0 (0.0)259 (49.8)
 Private hospital0 (0.0)261 (100)261 (50.2)

Others in profession: health officer, anesthesiologist, and radiographer; N : number. Others in ethnicity: SNNPs, Benishangul-Gumuz, and Gambella. Others in religion: Adventist, pagan.

4.2. Organizational and Job-Related Characteristics of Respondents

Overall, 51.0% and 59.6% of respondents worked in a pleasant and safe working environment, respectively. Around 48.5% and 60.8% of respondents got adequate supportive supervision and freedom on their jobs, respectively. Only 21.6% and 37.5% of the participants were given a clear job description and used their annual leave in public hospitals.

The majority of the respondents, 88.4% at the public and 87% at private hospitals, had a high workload. About 37.5% and 69% of public and private hospitals had got short-term training. Twelve and 17.4% of participants were satisfied with recognition, reward, and pay and benefit in public hospitals. Similarly, most of the respondents 87.7%, 63.6%, and 82.8% had good coworker relationships, adequate supportive supervision, and high affective commitment in private hospitals, respectively ( Table 2 ).

Organizational and job-related characteristics of health professionals working at public and private hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia ( n = 520), 2020.

VariablesPublic hospitals ( = 259)
(%)
Private hospitals ( = 283)
(%)
Total ( = 520)
(%)
Job descriptionYes56 (21.6)242 (92.7)298 (57.3)
No203 (78.4)19 (7.3)222 (42.7)
Short-term trainingYes97 (37.5)180 (69.0)277 (53.3)
No162 (62.5)81 (31.0)243 (46.7)
Annual leaveYes108 (41.7)182 (69.70)290 (55.8)
No151 (58.3)79 (30.3)230 (44.2)
Nature of workPleasant87 (33.6)178 (68.2)265 (51.0)
Unpleasant172 (66.4)83 (31.8)255 (49.0)
ResponsibilityYes98 (37.8)191 (73.2)289 (55.6)
No161 (62.2)70 (26.8)231 (44.4)
WorkloadHigh229 (88.4)227 (87.0)456 (87.7)
Low30 (11.6)34 (13.0)64 (12.3)
Work environmentSafe112 (43.2)198 (75.9)310 (59.6)
Unsafe147 (56.8)63 (24.1)210 (40.4)
Coworker relationshipGood176 (68.0)229 (87.7)405 (77.9)
Poor83 (32.0)32 (12.3)115 (22.1)
AutonomyYes132 (51.0)184 (70.5)316 (60.8)
No127 (49.0)77 (29.5)204 (39.2)
Pay and benefitFair44 (17.0)28 (10.7)72 (13.8)
Unfair215 (83.0)233 (89.3)448 (86.2)
Organizational policy and strategyComfortable54 (20.8)152 (58.2)206 (39.6)
Uncomfortable205 (79.2)109 (41.8)314 (60.4)
Performance appraisalYes56 (21.6)42 (16.1)98 (18.8)
No203 (78.4)219 (83.9)422 (81.2)
Recognition and rewardYes31 (12.0)57 (21.8)88 (16.9)
No228 (88.0)204 (78.2)432 (83.1)
Supportive supervisionAdequate86 (33.2)166 (63.6)252 (48.5)
Inadequate173 (66.8)95 (36.4)268 (51.5)
Educational opportunityYes40 (15.4)21 (8.0)61 (11.7)
No219 (84.6)240 (92.0)459 (88.3)
Affective commitmentHigh170 (65.6)216 (82.8)386 (74.2)
Low89 (34.4)45 (17.2)134 (25.8)
Normative commitmentHigh90 (34.7)154 (59.0)244 (46.9)
Low169 (65.3)107 (41.0)276 (53.1)
Continuance commitmentHigh58 (22.4)138 (52.9)196 (37.7)
Low201 (77.6)123 (47.1)324 (62.3)

4.3. Magnitude of Job Satisfaction

In this study, among job satisfaction items, the highest respondents' value was for the praise they get for doing a good job (67.1%), whereas the lowest respondents' value was for the way their coworkers get along with each other (47.9%). Healthcare professionals' overall magnitude of job satisfaction was 55.2% (95% CI: 51.0, 59.4%). However, the magnitude of job satisfaction at the public hospital was 29.0% (95% CI: 23.2, 35.1%) and at the private hospitals was 81.23% (95% CI: 76.6, 85.8%) ( Table 3 ).

Magnitude of job satisfaction among health professionals working at public and private hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia ( n = 520), 2020.

Job satisfaction itemsVD, (%)D, (%)N, (%)S, (%)VS, (%)Satisfied, (%)Dissatisfied, (%)
Being able to keep not being busy all the time206 (39.6)44 (8.5)95 (18.3)156 (30)19 (3.7)270 (51.9)250 (48.1)
The chance to work alone on the job65 (12.5)159 (30.6)91 (17.5)138 (26.5)67 (12.9)296 (56.9)224 (43.1)
The chance to do different things from time to time50 (9.6)189 (36.3)114 (21.9)91 (17.5)76 (14.6)281 (54.0)239 (46.0)
The chance to be somebody in the community30 (5.8)202 (38.8)127 (24.4)51 (9.8)110 (21.2)288 (55.4)232 (44.6)
The way my boss handles his/her workers53 (10.2)204 (39.2)138 (26.5)71 (13.7)54 (10.4)263 (50.6)257 (49.4)
The competence of my supervisor in making decision39 (7.5)182 (35)163 (31.3)83 (16.0)53 (10.2)299 (57.5)221 (42.5)
Being able to do things that do not go against my conscience29 (5.6)219 (42.1)129 (24.8)70 (13.5)73 (14.0)272 (52.3)248 (47.7)
The way my job provides for steady employment31 (6.0)217 (41.7)112 (21.5)65 (12.5)95 (18.3)272 (52.3)248 (47.7)
The chance to be responsible for the work of others33 (6.3)178 (34.2)169 (32.5)79 (15.2)61 (11.7)309 (59.4)211 (40.6)
The chance to tell people what to do31 (6.0)232 (44.6)123 (23.7)48 (9.2)86 (16.5)257 (49.4)263 (50.6)
The chance to do something that makes use of my abilities34 (6.5)208 (40.0)124 (23.8)81 (15.6)73 (14.0)278 (53.5)242 (46.5)
The way company policies are put into practice45 (8.7)216 (41.5)119 (22.9)90 (17.3)50 (9.6)259 (49.8)261 (50.2)
My pay and the amount of work I do154 (29.6)86 (16.5)115 (22.1)131 (25.2)34 (6.5)280 (53.8)240 (46.2)
The chances for advancement on this job120 (23.1)102 (19.6)119 (22.9)143 (27.5)36 (6.9)298 (57.3)222 (42.7)
The freedom to use my own judgment68 (13.1)165 (31.7)95 (18.3)98 (18.8)94 (18.1)287 (55.2)233 (44.8)
The chance to try my own methods of doing the job46 (8.8)202 (38.8)100 (19.2)87 (16.7)85 (16.3)272 (52.3)248 (47.7)
The working condition40 (7.7)228 (43.8)77 (14.8)61 (11.7)114 (21.9)252 (48.5)268 (51.5)
The way my coworkers get along with each other30 (5.8)241 (46.3)107 (20.6)58 (11.2)84 (16.2)249 (47.9)271 (52.1)
The praise I get for doing a good job86 (16.5)85 (16.3)166 (31.9)118 (22.7)65 (12.5)349 (67.1)171 (32.9)
The feeling of accomplishment I get from the job32 (6.2)195 (37.5)73 (14.0)61 (11.7)159 (30.6)293 (56.3)227 (43.7)
Magnitude of job satisfaction in private hospitals212 (81.2)49 (18.8)
Magnitude of job satisfaction in public hospitals75 (29.0)184 (71.0)
Overall magnitude of job satisfaction287 (55.2)233 (44.8)

NB: VD: very dissatisfied; D: dissatisfied; N: neutral; S: satisfied; VS: very satisfied; n : number of participants.

4.4. Factors Associated with Health Worker Job Satisfaction in Public and Private Hospitals

The multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, performance appraisal, reward and recognition, and normative commitment were significant variables for job satisfaction in public hospitals. Respondents aged greater than or equal to 30 years were 13 times more satisfied (AOR: 13.06; 95% CI: 4.83, 35.34) compared to respondents aged less than 30 years. Healthcare professionals who agree with the performance appraisal practice were 86% less likely to be satisfied than those who disagree with the performance appraisal practice (AOR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.63). Healthcare professionals who got good rewards and recognition were 4.09 times more likely to be satisfied compared to those who did not get good rewards and recognition (AOR: 4.9; 95% CI: 1.17, 14.29). Study participants with high normative commitment were 3.14 times more likely to be satisfied than those with low normative commitment (AOR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.30, 7.61) ( Table 4 ).

Bivariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with job satisfaction, public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city, 2020 ( N = 261).

VariablesPrivate hospitals ( = 261)Public hospitals ( = 259)
Job satisfactionJob satisfaction
Satisfied
(%)
Dissatisfied
(%)
COR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Satisfied
(%)
Dissatisfied
(%)
COR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
Age20-29NANANANA677511
≥30810912.17 (5.51, 26.85)13.06 (4.83, 35.34)
Educational levelDiploma692811185511
Degree120162.75 (1.41, 5.33)2.40 (0.96, 5.97)501201.32 (0.70, 2.45)1.43 (0.66, 3.10)
Above degree21102.70 (0.74, 9.85)0.84 (0.08, 8.27)792.29 (0.46, 11.25)2.24 (0.22, 22.82)
Monthly salary<3653671711NANANANA
3653-529470190.93 (0.44, 1.95)1.35 (0.43, 4.19)
5295-71111870.65 (0.23, 1.81)0.24 (0.05, 1.06)
>71115762.41 (0.88, 6.53)1.11 (0.30, 3.99)
Job descriptionYes203395.78 (2.20, 15.18)5.59 (1.28, 24.31) 681353.52 (1.51, 8.21)2.04 (0.71, 5.86)
No9101174911
Short-term trainingYes153272.11 (1.11, 4.00)0.68 (0.18, 2.54)541081.80 (1.01, 3.24)0.69 (0.27, 1.74)
No592211217611
Nature of workPleasant49340.36 (0.25, 0.51)0.29 (0.10, 0.85) 361360.57 (0.43, 0.75)1.01 (0.43, 2.39)
Unpleasant1631511394811
ResponsibilityYes170215.39 (2.78, 10.44)2.21 (0.80, 6.05)591022.96 (1.58, 5.54)1.11 (0.43, 2.89)
No422811168211
Work environmentSafe174244.76 (2.45, 9.24)0.64 (0.20, 2.00)43692.23 (1.29, 3.87)1.25 (0.52, 3.00)
Unsafe3825113211511
Coworker relationshipGood192373.11 (1.40, 6.92)0.84 (0.24, 2.85)561201.57 (0.85, 2.87)0.44 (0.16, 1.21)
Poor201211196411
AutonomyYes167176.98 (3.55, 13.72)3.00 (1.01, 8.95) 54783.49 (1.94, 6.26)1.70 (0.70, 4.10)
No4532112110611
Pay and benefitFairNANANANA17281.63 (0.83, 3.20)0.90 (0.32, 2.51)
Unfair5815611
Organizational policy and strategyComfortable136163.69 (1.90, 7.14)0.46 (0.14, 1.44)29254.00 (2.13, 7.51)1.42 (0.58, 3.49)
Uncomfortable7633114615911
Performance appraisalYes4075.46 (1.27, 23.51)3.76 (0.88, 15.91)21351.65 (0.88, 3.09)0.24 (0.09, 0.63)
No17242115414911
Supportive supervisionAdequate153137.18 (3.55, 14.50)2.36 (0.75, 7.38)44424.79 (2.69, 8.53)2.31 (0.89, 5.95)
Inadequate5936113114211
Education opportunityYesNANANANA17232.05 (1.02, 4.11)0.76 (0.24, 2.36)
No5816111
Reward and recognitionYes5485.24 (1.56, 17.58)4.10 (0.64, 26.02)19124.86 (2.21, 10.65)4.09 (1.17, 14.29)
No15841115617211
Affective commitmentHigh189276.69 (3.28, 13.63)3.01 (0.98, 9.23)591112.42 (1.29, 4.54)0.92 (0.31, 2.69)
Low232211167311
Normative commitmentHigh141135.49 (2.73, 11.03)2.28 (0.68, 7.61)42483.60 (2.05, 6.33)3.14 (1.30, 7.61)
Low7136113313611
Continuance commitmentHighNANANANA22361.70 (0.92, 3.16)1.21 (0.55, 2.67)
Low5314811

∗∗ p value < 0.01; ∗ p value < 0.05. 1 = reference category; NA: not applicable.

Job description, nature of work, and autonomy were significant variables for job satisfaction in private hospitals. Accordingly, the respondents who got clear job descriptions were 5.59 times more likely to be satisfied than their counterparts (AOR: 5.59; 95% CI: 1.28, 24.31). Healthcare professionals working in the pleasant nature of work were 71% less likely to be satisfied than those working in unpleasant work (AOR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.85). Healthcare professionals who had autonomy in decision-making were 3.0 times more likely to be satisfied compared to their counterparts (AOR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.01, 8.95) ( Table 4 ).

4.5. Factors Associated with Overall Health Professional Job Satisfaction

In the final multivariable logistic regression analysis model, workplace work, job description, nature of work, autonomy, supportive supervision, reward and recognition, and normative commitment were factors associated with overall job satisfaction ( p < 0.05). Subsequently, health professionals working in private hospitals were 8.89 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who work in public hospitals (AOR: 8.89; 95% CI: 5.14, 15.35).

Healthcare professionals working in the pleasant nature of work were 1.82 times more likely to be satisfied than those working in the unpleasant nature of work (AOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.15). Study participants who had autonomy for decision-making were 2.37 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who had no autonomy for decision-making (AOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.29, 4.33). Respondents who got adequate integrated supportive supervision were 2.42 times more likely to be satisfied with their job compared to those who did not get adequate supervision (AOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.33, 4.40).

Healthcare professionals who got good rewards and recognition were 3.04 times more likely to be satisfied compared to those who did not get good rewards and recognition (AOR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.37, 6.75). Study participants with high normative commitment were 2.57 times more likely to be satisfied than those with low normative commitment (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.48, 4.43) ( Table 5 ).

Bivariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with overall job satisfaction, hospitals in Bahir Dar city, 2020 ( N = 520).

VariablesJob satisfaction
Satisfied
(%)
Dissatisfied
(%)
COR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
Work placePublic hospital7518411
Private hospital2124910.61 (7.03, 16.01)8.89 (5.14, 15.35)
Job descriptionYes2711745.74 (3.19, 10.30)2.31 (0.90, 3.90)
No165911
Short-term trainingYes2071351.87 (1.30, 2.71)0.65 (0.34, 1.21)
No809811
Annual leaveYes1971361.56 (1.08, 2.23)0.79 (0.45, 1.40)
No909711
Nature of workPleasant202636.41 (4.36, 9.42)1.82 (1.05, 3.15)
Unpleasant8517011
Work environmentSafe217834.66 (3.20, 6.79)0.91 (0.49, 1.69)
Unsafe7014011
Coworker relationshipGood2482573.07 (1.99, 4.75)0.71 (0.36, 1.37)
Poor397611
AutonomyYes221954.86 (3.32, 7.11)2.37 (1.29, 4.33)
No6613811
Organizational policy and strategyComfortable165416.33 (4.19, 9.55)0.86 (0.45, 1.64)
Uncomfortable12219211
Performance appraisalYes61371.42 (0.91, 2.24)0.78 (0.42, 1.45)
No22619611
Supportive supervisionAdequate197557.08 (4.78, 10.48)2.42 (1.33, 4.40)
Inadequate9017811
Reward and recognitionYes73154.95 (2.75, 8.91)3.04 (1.37, 6.75)
No21421811
Affective commitmentHigh2481384.37 (2.85, 6.71)1.62 (0.85, 3.09)
Low399511
Normative commitmentHigh183614.96 (3.39, 7.24)2.57 (1.48, 4.43)
Low10417211
Continuance commitmentHigh135612.50 (1.72, 3.63)0.73 (0.43, 1.24)
Low15217211

∗∗ Significant at p value < 0.01; ∗ significant at p value < 0.05; 1 = reference category.

5. Discussion

In this study, the magnitude of overall job satisfaction was found to be 55.2 (51.0, 59.4)%. The finding showed that the health professionals working at private hospitals were more satisfied 81.2% (76.6, 85.8%) than those working at public hospitals 29 (23.2, 35.1%). This discrepancy could have resulted from differences in infrastructure in the health institutions, administrative issues, socioeconomic characteristics, and healthcare workers' organizational setup.

In this study, the magnitude of overall job satisfaction was comparable with previous studies conducted among health professionals in Ethiopia, at Addis Ababa 52.9% [ 17 ], East Gojjam zone (54.2%) [ 16 ], and northwest Ethiopia (46.9%) [ 20 ]. But this finding was lower than those of studies conducted in Jimma University Specialized Hospital 60.3% [ 19 ], Nepal (76%) [ 12 ], and Nigeria (90.4%) [ 14 ]. On the other hand, it is higher than studies done among health professionals in Ghana 36.4% [ 15 ], Vietnam 41.8% [ 10 ], Pakistan 41% [ 11 ], India 24.7% [ 5 ], Sri Lanka 23.7% [ 13 ], Harari region in Ethiopia 44.2% [ 6 ], western Ethiopia 41.46% [ 21 ], and Amhara region 46.9% [ 18 ]. The possible reasons for this variation might be due to the study time differences, differences in socioeconomic status, and differences in the study's geographical area.

In this study, the magnitude of job satisfaction at the public hospitals was lower than studies done in Vietnam, 41.8% [ 10 ]; Pakistan, 41% [ 11 ]; Ghana, 36.4% [ 15 ]; Harari region in Ethiopia, 44.2% [ 6 ]; Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 60.3% [ 19 ]; and Amhara region, 46.9% [ 18 ]. The magnitude of job satisfaction in private hospitals in this study was higher than in a study conducted in Nepal (76%) [ 12 ]. On the other hand, it was lower than a study conducted in Nigeria (90.4%) [ 14 ]. However, it is higher than studies done in Ethiopia [ 11 , 17 , 19 , 20 ]. Possible reasons for this variation might be the differences in infrastructure in the health institutions, study area differences, and the tools used to measure the outcome variable that might affect job satisfaction. In this study, the tools used to measure the outcome variable were the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, whereas the majority of previous studies used other tools like the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) and Satisfaction of Employees in Healthcare (SEHC).

The odds of job satisfaction were higher among healthcare professionals who work in private hospitals. This was supported by other studies conducted in China and New York [ 7 , 23 ].

Healthcare professionals working in a pleasant nature of work were more likely to be satisfied than those who are working in an unpleasant nature of work. This finding is supported by other studies carried out elsewhere [ 8 , 40 ]. This can be the fact that if employees are engaged with a kind of work and they labeled it as worthwhile, are with pride, and are able to see results, it is likely that they will be satisfied with their job. Study participants who had autonomy for decision-making were more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who had no autonomy for decision-making. This finding is congruent with other studies conducted in India and Chicago [ 3 , 26 ]. This can be explained as when employees had freedom of decision to accomplish their assigned task and chance to control scheduling of their work, they are likely to be satisfied.

Besides, in this study, health professionals who got adequate supportive supervision were more likely to be satisfied with their job as compared to those who did not get supportive supervision. This finding was consistent with a study from the western Amhara region [ 25 ]. These factors were opportunities for reward, nature of work, supervision, and benefit status of the organization [ 8 ]. Health professionals who got rewards and recognition were more likely to be satisfied with their job than those who did not get rewards and recognition. Also, those working in a pleasant nature of work were more satisfied than those who worked in the unpleasant nature of work. This finding was in line with a study conducted elsewhere [ 8 ]. Finally, healthcare professionals who reported a high normative commitment were more likely to be satisfied with their job than their counterparts. This was consistent with a study conducted elsewhere [ 41 ]. This was because if employees feel a sense of belongingness or are involved and linked emotionally with the organization, they are likely to be satisfied.

6. Strength and Limitations of the Study

The possible limitation of the study was social desirability and a recall bias which may lead to artificially inflated variables. To minimize this effect, a self-administered questionnaire was used. Besides, variables were categorized, which may probably hide information. Furthermore, this study was not triangulated with a qualitative method.

7. Conclusions

The magnitude of job satisfaction was relatively low in both private and public hospital health professionals and severe among health professionals working in public hospitals. This study revealed that healthcare professionals' job satisfaction was relatively low in private and public hospitals and somehow severe in the public hospitals at Bahir Dar city. The pleasant nature of work, good reward and recognition system, and high affective commitment were positively associated with healthcare professional's job satisfaction at the private hospitals. Being a medical doctor and pharmacy professional, a safe work environment, and adequate supportive supervision positively influence public hospitals' job satisfaction. In light of this finding, healthcare policy-makers and hospital administrators should consider the identified factors to improve healthcare professionals' job satisfaction in private and public hospitals.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Policy, for making this thesis work by giving ethical clearance, assigning advisors, and giving financial support. We forward our appreciation to the health managers for allowing us to conduct this research and their cooperation. Finally, we would like to thank study participants for their volunteer participation and data collectors and supervisors for their genuineness and quality of work during data collection. The University of Gondar sponsored this study.

Abbreviations

AC:Affective commitment
AOR:Adjusted Odds Ratio
BSc:Bachelor of Science
CC:Continuance commitment
CI:Confidence interval
COR:Crude odds ratio
Dr.:Doctor
ETB:Ethiopian birr
HR:Human resource
HWs:Health workers
MPH:Master of Public Health
NC:Normative commitment
NGOs:Nongovernmental organizations
OC:Organizational commitment
PhD:Doctor of Philosophy
SDGs:Sustainable development goals
SHP:Sample health professional
SPSS:Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
THP:Total health professional
WHO:World Health Organization.

Data Availability

Ethical approval.

The Institutional Ethical Review Board of the University of Gondar approved the study. Ethical clearance was obtained from the board on behalf of the public health school (Ref. No. IPH/837/2020). Upon this clearance, additional written permission to conduct the study was obtained from the manager of public and private health institutions. The human resource manager was told about the purpose of the study.

Written informed consent was obtained from participants to confirm willingness. They were notified that they have the right to refuse or terminate at any point in the interview. The extracted information was not used other than for study purposes. The extracted information was locked in a file cabinet in the researcher's position only and finally burnt.

The University of Gondar has no role in the decision to publish, manuscript preparation, and publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Authors' Contributions

AG designed the study, developed data collection tools, analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted the paper. GA, ED, and LY developed the study proposal, analysis, and interpretation, revised drafts of the paper, and revised the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • My Bibliography
  • Collections
  • Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

  • Create a new collection
  • Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in NLM Catalog
  • Add to Search

Factors affecting allied health faculty job satisfaction: a literature review

Affiliation.

  • 1 University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, School of Health Related Professions, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA. [email protected]
  • PMID: 21399846

Evidence in the literature suggests job satisfaction can make a difference in keeping qualified workers on the job, but little research has been conducted focusing specifically on allied health faculty. In order to attract and retain top quality faculty, colleges and universities should understand the variables impacting faculty satisfaction and develop a plan to enhance satisfaction. An integrative literature review (CINHAL, ERIC, Journal of Allied Health, Chronicle of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, and current books on job satisfaction) of faculty job satisfaction and dissatisfaction produced a variety of publications presenting the key determinants of job satisfaction by allied health faculty in the United States. The purpose of the analysis was to examine the various factors that influence job satisfaction, especially by allied health faculty, in institutions of higher education in the U.S. The procedure used for this analysis consisted of reviewing allied health and higher education faculty studies to identify factors influencing job satisfaction, research questions, sample size reported, instruments used for measurement of job satisfaction, and job satisfaction results. While the theoretical models of allied health and higher education faculty job satisfaction exist separately in the literature, their remarkable similarities permit the prospect of a contemporary framework of the essential components of job satisfaction. Potential opportunities for continuing research on the personal and professional variables impacting job satisfaction of allied health faculty and similar disciplines are presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • A longitudinal evaluation of graduate programs in allied health education and administration. Holcomb JD, Thomson WA, Evans DW, Buckner WP, Ponder LD. Holcomb JD, et al. J Allied Health. 1987 May;16(2):119-33. J Allied Health. 1987. PMID: 3610806
  • Organizational and professional commitment as predictors of job satisfaction among allied health education program directors. Moskowitz RL, Scanlan CL. Moskowitz RL, et al. J Allied Health. 1986 Feb;15(1):11-22. J Allied Health. 1986. PMID: 3485625
  • Occupational attainment in selected allied health professions. Stoecker JL. Stoecker JL. J Allied Health. 1990 Fall;19(4):325-38. J Allied Health. 1990. PMID: 2272892
  • Job satisfaction of nurse teachers: a literature review. Part I: Measurement, levels and components. Gui L, Barriball KL, While AE. Gui L, et al. Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jul;29(5):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 25. Nurse Educ Today. 2009. PMID: 19111372 Review.
  • Faculty research productivity in allied health settings: a TQM approach. Paterson M, Baker D, Gable C, Michael S, Wintch K. Paterson M, et al. J Allied Health. 1993 Summer;22(3):249-61. J Allied Health. 1993. PMID: 8244873 Review.
  • Unveiling the Exodus: A scoping review of attrition in allied health. Yeoh SA, Kumar S, Phillips A, Li LSK. Yeoh SA, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308302. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39240875 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Assessing the mediating role of motivation in the relationship between perceived management support and perceived job satisfaction among family doctors in Jiangsu province, China. Xu X, Zhou L, Ampon-Wireko S, Quansah PE. Xu X, et al. Hum Resour Health. 2023 Aug 28;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00849-x. Hum Resour Health. 2023. PMID: 37641138 Free PMC article.
  • Occupational Therapy Education in Saudi Arabia: Barriers and Solutions From a Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Al-Heizan MO, Alhammad SA, Aldaihan MM, Alwadeai KS. Al-Heizan MO, et al. Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36139. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36139. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36937131 Free PMC article.
  • Challenges in providing surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative study among Operating Department Practitioners in Pakistan. Jafree SR, Momina AU, Malik N, Naqi SA, Fischer F. Jafree SR, et al. Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):368504211023282. doi: 10.1177/00368504211023282. Sci Prog. 2021. PMID: 34152874 Free PMC article.
  • A comparative study on the level of satisfaction among regular and contractual health-care workers in a Northern city of India. Dixit J, Goel S, Sharma V. Dixit J, et al. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):416-423. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_278_16. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017. PMID: 29302557 Free PMC article.

Publication types

  • Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

  • Ingenta plc
  • Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

  • Apply Reviewer
  • Subscribe Newsletter
  • Track Paper
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Work with Us

factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  • ISSN 2454-6186
  • Strengthening Social Sciences for the Future
  • September Issue 2024
  • Research Area
  • Registration
  • Virtual Library

></center></p><p>Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A Review of Empirical Literature</p><ul><li>Prof. Thomas Katua Ngui</li><li>Mar 16, 2023</li><li>Human resource management</li></ul><p>Prof. Thomas Katua Ngui United States International University – Africa, KENYA</p><p>The commonly held opinion is that “a satisfied worker is a productive worker”. There is a reciprocal relationship between satisfaction and performance; this means that satisfaction causes performance and performance causes satisfaction. When an employee is satisfied with their job they commit their energies and effort towards achievement of organizational goals sometimes at the expense of their personal goals. The purpose of this study is to find out the factors that influence the level of job satisfaction among the workforce. Increased job satisfaction will motivate employees to achieve the organizational goals. A satisfied work force will create a pleasant atmosphere within the organization to perform well (Pushpakumari, 2008).  Low job satisfaction could cause employees to move away from their jobs, search for new jobs, or change their existing jobs and careers. The degree of organizational loyalty of employee is higher when employee job satisfaction increased (Javed, Balouch & Hassan, 2014). It is therefore, very critical for organizations to approach their performance improvement goal from the employee job satisfaction point. For this to happen effectively, it is necessary for the managers to understand the factors that determine job satisfaction among employees. Studies have shown that job satisfaction is influenced by a variety of factors- both internal and external to the organization. This study sought to review literature on the factors that determine or influence job satisfaction. From the study it was found that job satisfaction is an outcome of different factors like pay, the work itself, job security, supervision, leadership styles, relationships with co-workers and opportunities for promotions. The findings of this study will help managers at all levels to play a key role in improving the levels of job satisfaction among employees within their jurisdictions. This in turn will lead to higher performance both at the individual, team and organizational levels.</p><p>Key Words: Job security, Job satisfaction; Performance</p><h2>INTRODUCTION</h2><p>With increased technological growth and globalization of markets the business environment has become very competitive and complex. This requires organizations to up their game in order to remain competitive and survive in the changed business environment. To succeed in this very turbulent market, most organizations have invested in acquisition of high quality resources that are valuable, unique, non- imitable and rare in order to sustain their competitiveness. Such resources include human, physical, technological and financial resources. Among the identified resources, the human resources have been found to be the best source of sustainable competitive advantage. The success of any organization depends on the satisfaction of its workforce (Mekonin & Teklu, 2021).</p><p>Every organization’s success indeed depends on employee satisfaction on job as their effort has been paid off ( Khaira, Afifah, Shariff & Sima, 2021) . Leaders today believe that impressive human resource is the power factor of an organization. This is because human resources are unique and cannot be copied. Human resource is an active resource which has emotions and can react differently to different situations. Human resource is considered as the most important asset which serves as the engine for providing a sustainable source of energy and service delivery in the organization (Muhammad & Wajidi, 2013). The importance of intellectual capital has increased to the point of being one of the most valuable assets that must be better understood in order to be developed (Ouedraogo & ALeclerc, 2013).  This is largely because the human resource is an active resource that has the capability to activate other resources in pursuit of organizational goals/ objectives. It is also very unique and cannot be copied.</p><p>The millennium generation employees (millennials) have different expectations from the job environment compared to the expectations of the previous generation of workers. For this new generation of employees to be productive and to unleash their full potential, they should be satisfied with their job. This requires managers to be very cautious while dealing with the millennials and also to understand their needs/ expectations in order to fully benefit from their skills and knowledge. Job satisfaction is a result of employees’ perception of how well their job provides those things which are viewed as important (Ndulue & Ekechukwu, 2016). If the human resource or employees are happy and contended with the moves and actions of the employer, they do their best for the best of the organization (Khan, Nawaz, Aleem & Hamed, 2012). A satisfied work force will create a pleasant atmosphere within the organization to perform well (Pushpakumari, 2008).</p><p>There is a reciprocal relationship between satisfaction and performance; this means that satisfaction and performance influence each other. Increased job satisfaction will motivate employees to achieve the organizational goals. When employees perform well and achieve the organizational goals they are also likely to be motivated by the improved performance which in turn leads to higher job satisfaction. The factors that contribute to the positive morale and attitude also result in a higher degree of job satisfaction (Saranya, 2014). A highly satisfied work force is absolutely necessary for achieving a high level of performance in an organization. Satisfied workers tend to extend more effort to job performance, then work harder and better (Pushpakumari, 2008). Job satisfaction is an important factor for improving effectiveness and also a person’s satisfaction in a company. Job satisfaction is achieved from situations a person experience in his job, so factors such as management method, organization policy and structure, job conditions and type of relation with coworkers are important (Weiss, 2002).</p><p>Many studies have been done on the relationship between job satisfaction and performance, for example, Khan, Nawaz, Aleem and Hamed, (2012); Revenio Jr. (2016); Ndulue and Ekechukwu (2016) and Bakotic, (2016) have all done studies on this topic. However, due to the changing nature of the work environment as a result of advancement in technology and the changed expectation of the current millennial employee, this topic remains a topic of interest and requires continuous research in order to meet the psychological needs of the new category of employees whose expectations are quite different from those of the previous generation of workers. The purpose of this paper is to review literature on the factors that influence level of job satisfaction among the workforce and its effects on performance.</p><p>Job satisfaction</p><p>Job satisfaction is an affective or emotional response towards various facets of one’s job (Ndulue & Ekechukwu, 2016). Cranny, Smith and Stone (2014) defined job satisfaction as employees’ emotional state regarding the job, considering what they expected and what they actually got out of it. According to Willem, (2007) job satisfaction shows the relation between human expectations and advantages taken from job. Vroom (1964) as cited in Revenio Jr. (2016) defines job satisfaction as an “effective orientations on the part of the individuals towards work roles which they are presently occupying”. Job satisfaction is a positive emotional state that arises from the employee’s work or practical experience, and results in job satisfaction from the realization of the extent to which the employees work provides the things that he or she considers important (Hareem, 2013). According to Spector (1997) job satisfaction shows peoples emotion about their job generally or about some parts of it (i.e. organization, job, supervisory, coworkers, salary and income and promotions). Job satisfaction describes the positive or negative attitude of a person regarding his employment and work environment (Weiss, 2002; Greenberg, 2008). This could be both psychological as well as physiological factors (Revenio Jr., 2016).</p><p>Satisfaction is a complex and multifaceted concept (Revenio Jr., 2016) that is influenced by both internal and external environmental factors. Work environment is an important determinant of job satisfaction of employees (Herzberg, 1968; Spector, 2008).  Existing literature and research results show that job satisfaction is influenced by a variety of factors- both internal and external to the organization. The organizations have a level of control over the internal factors, however, they have very limited or no control of the external environmental factors that influence job satisfaction. Different factors within the working environment such as wages, working hours, autonomy given to employees, organizational structure and communication between employees and management may affect job satisfaction (Lane, Esser, Holte, & Anne, 2010). Therefore, the organization should strive to improve on the factors that they have control over in order to increase the level of job satisfaction. At the same time they should try as much as possible to support those responsible for the external environment to improve it. This may call for initiatives that are similar to the existing public-private partnerships.</p><p>The results of a study by Dawal and Taha, (2015) showed that job and environmental factors are significantly related to job satisfaction. Job satisfaction is an outcome of different factors like pay, promotion, the work itself, supervision, relationships with co-workers and opportunities for promotions (Opkara, 2002). Ndulue and Ekechukwu, (2016) have also identified pay, the work itself, promotions, supervision, workgroup, and working conditions as the factors that influence job satisfaction. The level of job satisfaction is affected by intrinsic and extrinsic motivating factors, the quality of supervision, social relationships with work group and the degree to which individuals succeed or fail in their work (Armstrong, 2006).</p><p>Pay, the work itself, promotions, supervision, workgroup and working conditions have a great influence on the level of an employee’s satisfaction with the job (Luthans, 1985). According to Saranya, (2014) the important factors that contribute to the higher level of job satisfaction are challenging and responsible job, numerous promotional opportunities, impartial treatment by the management, creativity and innovative ideas of job security, attractive salary and perks, freedom in work situation, participative management and welfare facilities like medical, uniform, canteen etc. Smith, Kendall and Hullin (1969) expressed the five aspects that can be used to determine job satisfaction as; being satisfied from job (i.e. interesting tasks and opportunities for learning and training), being satisfied from supervisor (i.e. technical and managing abilities and their considerations about employees), being satisfied from coworkers (technical qualification and support they show), being satisfied from promotion (achieving real opportunity to advance), being satisfied from income (amount of income, its equality and way of paying to staff).</p><p>Other researchers who have investigated the factors that affect job satisfaction include Tabassum, Khan, Sherani, and Khan, (2016) who say that the major determinants of job satisfaction are basically nine facets which are pay, promotion, supervision, fringe benefits, contingent rewards, operating procedures, co-workers, nature of works and communication. Purcell, Kinnie, Hutchinson, Rayton, and Swart, (2003) also did a research and found that the key factors affecting job satisfaction were career opportunities, job influence, team work and job challenge. According to Revenio Jr. (2016) leadership style also has a great role in the employee’s level of job satisfaction. Brudney and Coundry (1993) have also explained different variables that influence performance of the employees in the organization. They included factors such as pay, organization commitment, relationship between pay and performance, etc. Working conditions have positive impact on job satisfaction (Guest, 2004; Silla, Gracia & Peiro, 2005). Job satisfaction is adversely affected by factors such as lack of promotion, working conditions, low job security and low level of autonomy (Guest, 2004; Silla et al., 2005).</p><p>It is essential for an organization to motivate their employees to work hard for achieving the organizational goals and objectives. According to Jerrell, Coggburn, Battaglio Jr., and Bradbury, (2014) how an organization manages conflict also has a bearing on employee job satisfaction.</p><p>Empirical Review</p><p>Various studies have been done on the factors affecting job satisfaction. Some of the factors researched about include job security, leadership/ supervision styles, salaries, promotion opportunities among others.  Javed, Balouch and Hassan, (2014) did a study on the determinants of job satisfaction and its impact on employee performance and turnover intentions. The results of the study showed a significant positive association of employee empowerment, workplace environment, job loyalty and job performance with job satisfaction. The results show that employee empowerment has a significant positive relationship and it contributes more than 37% to job satisfaction. Therefore, when an employee is given autonomy in business decisions then his satisfaction level will rise. Furthermore, there was a significant negative relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention. According to the result of the study, job satisfaction has a significant negative relationship with turnover intentions contributing more than 32% to turnover intentions. Whenever there is low level of employee satisfaction in any organization, the employees of that organization will intentionally leave that organization.</p><p>Cheginy, Isfahani, Mohseni, Khakian and Khosravizadeh (2014) did a study to investigate the factors influencing job satisfaction among hospital personnel. The results of the study showed that there is a significant relationship between job satisfaction and personnel’s perceptions about their work conditions, satisfaction with supervision, satisfaction with coworkers, satisfaction with work nature and satisfaction with salary and advantage. Rukh, Choundhary and Abbasi (2015) did a study on the analysis of factors affecting employee satisfaction in Pakistan. Research findings indicated the significant factors that affect the satisfaction level of employees as pay, promotion, relation with employees, relation with supervisor, work stress and job security. The results further showed that the median group differences existed between responses based on age, work experience, salary and designation (i.e. job position/rank) of employees. Job satisfaction was also positively and significantly associated with job related factors such as pay, promotion, relation with employees, relation with supervisor, work stress and job security. From the study they concluded that job satisfaction of employees was significantly affected by demographic, financial and non-financial factors. Employees who are older than 50 years, with greater experience, and in higher management positions were more satisfied with pay, promotion, work stress, work condition and working environment. The employees’ departments did not play any significant role in affecting satisfaction levels.</p><p>Viñas-Bardolet, Velazco and Torrent-Sellens (2013) did a study on the determinants of Job Satisfaction, the Role of Knowledge-based work: An illustration from Spain and found that job satisfaction, depends on worker attributes, financial and non-financial job characteristics. The results also show that net monthly income is a positive and highly significant variable in explaining job satisfaction. Evidence suggests that financial and non-financial (work organisation and work intensity) job dimensions are the most important determinants of knowledge-based workers satisfaction in Spain. Mosadegh Rad and De Moraes (2009) did a study to investigate the specific factors associated with job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in employees at the Isfahan University Hospitals (lUHs) in Isfahan, Iran. The study also focused on revealing homogeneous demographic characteristics that these employees exhibited, and which affect their satisfaction level. It was found that overall employees were moderately satisfied with their jobs, and more satisfied with the following aspects of their current work situation: supervision, job identity and co-workers. The lowest satisfaction scores were found for benefits, contingent rewards, communication, salaries, work conditions and promotion. Motivating factors included loyalty to employees, job security, good pay, good working conditions, tactful discipline, involvement, recognition and promotion.</p><p>Job security is a significant determinant of job satisfaction. Job security provides workers with a much-needed sense of structure (Woods, 2018). The effect of job security on worker job satisfaction is different depending on whether perceived job loss occurs (or not), whether job openings are scarce or whether job openings are plentiful (Artz & Kaya, 2014). In the results of their study Artz & Kaya (2014) showed that three measures of job security increase private sector worker job satisfaction, and reduce worker incentives to quit. Few workers quit when job openings are relatively scarce (during contractions) than when job openings are relatively plentiful (during expansions). People want to know their job is available for as long as they wish to hold it. When job security decreases, satisfaction and performance levels also take a hit. Results of a study by Reisel, Probst, Chia, Maloles and König, (2010) on the effects of job insecurity on job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, deviant behavior, and negative emotions of employees show that job insecurity is negatively related to satisfaction and that job insecurity has both direct and indirect effects on work behaviors and emotions.</p><p>The work environment has also been researched in relation to job satisfaction. Raziq and Maulabakhsh, (2015) did a study on the Impact of Working Environment on Job Satisfaction and found a positive relationship between working environment and employee job satisfaction. Their study concluded that the businesses need to realize the importance of good working environment for maximizing the level of job satisfaction.  Other results have also shown that there is a positive link between work environment and intrinsic aspect of the job satisfaction. According to Javed, Balouch, and Hassan, (2014) work place environment has a positive relation with job satisfaction and it contributes 16% to job satisfaction. Since it has a positive impact on job satisfaction so it shows that when an employee is given favorable and clean environment then his/her satisfaction level rises. Bakotic and Babic (2013) found that the workers who work under difficult working conditions, are dissatisfied through this work environment.</p><p>Promotions are also an important aspect of a worker’s career and life, affecting other facets of the work experience. With regard to promotions some studies have also been done by various researchers. Malik, Danish and Munir, (2012) did a study  to determine the impact of pay and promotion on job satisfaction in higher education institutes of Pakistan and found that pay has significant influence on job satisfaction but the promotion has less influence and partially significant to the job satisfaction. Kosteas (2007) did a study on job Satisfaction and Promotions and found that promotions have a lasting, but diminishing impact on job satisfaction. Kosteas (2007) also find a strong, negative correlation between quits and both job satisfaction and promotion expectations. Promotion has a positive impact on job satisfaction (Nguyen et al., 2003; Teseema & Soeters, 2006). Khan and Mishra, (2013) also did a research on promotion as job satisfaction, a study on Colleges of Muscat, Sultanate Of Oman and the research findings indicate that academic teaching employees where satisfied with the promotion. There was a significant difference in the level of satisfaction. Analysis showed that promotion has a modest and positive effect on job satisfaction.</p><p>Mabaso and Dlamini (2017) did a study on the impact of compensation and benefits on job satisfaction and found a positive and significant effect of compensation on job satisfaction (p = 0.263). Moreover, they found that there was no significant effect between benefits and job satisfaction. Therefore, only compensation significantly predicted job satisfaction among academic staff. A study by Usman, Akbar and Ramzan (2013) on the effect of salary and stress on job satisfaction of teachers in District Sialkot, Pakistan found that from the two independent variables (salary and stress) only salary of the teachers was significantly affecting the job satisfaction of teachers. Financial rewards (salary) were found to significantly affect job satisfaction of teachers. Based on the findings of the study by Usman, Akbar and Ramzan (2013) it means that if employees are not given proper salary in time, they would be highly dissatisfied with their jobs and may ultimately start thinking of leaving the profession. This is due to the fact that cost of living is highly increasing in Pakistan. Other results of a study by Muhammed zia Ur Rehman, (2010) found that job satisfaction was significantly related with extrinsic rewards (salary and other benefits). Arian, Soleimani and Oghazian (2018) did a study on job satisfaction and the factors affecting satisfaction in nurse educators and found that there is a positive correlation between job satisfaction and promotion opportunities and that those professors with a high level of job satisfaction had a higher pay and salary. Job satisfaction of bank officers is significantly dependent upon compensation, promotion opportunities, rewards, relation with boss and coworkers. The study found that compensation is the main factor affecting job satisfaction, and it also has significant relationships with job involvement and promotion. Some evidence that workers who are dissatisfied with their bosses are more sensitive to their compensation in deciding on whether they are satisfied with their job was also established from the study.</p><p>An affable relationship between supervisor and employee leads to job satisfaction. According to the Essays, UK (November 2013) an amiable supervisor-employee relationship builds the employee’s morale, which makes him to feel affective about his job, especially when his efforts are recognized and rewarded. This brings him satisfaction in his job. Thus, the employee strives to achieve both organizational and personal goals.</p><p>A study by Nidadhavolu, Akhila, (2018) on the impact of leadership styles on employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the construction sector in India proved that an organization’s leadership style strongly influences employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The application of transformational leadership style leads to stronger job satisfaction. This finding established that leadership has a major influence on work outcome and job satisfaction in the company. The employees are most satisfied when they see their leaders possess both relation-oriented and task-oriented behaviors. The study also highlighted a laissez-faire leadership style is a consequence of job satisfaction. The findings show that the laissez-faire leadership style could result in low interpersonal relationships, resulting in weak employee job satisfaction and productivity levels. The research findings found that out of the three construction companies chosen for the study, the laissez-faire leadership style had a negative influence on job satisfaction and organizational commitment on the employees of two companies. Whereas, the transformational leadership style had a positive impact on the employees of one company. The study also discovered the negative influence of upper-management leadership style on employees has a negative influence on organization performance.</p><p>Saleem, (2015) did a study on the impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Research findings revealed that transformational leadership has a positive impact on job satisfaction and transactional leadership has a negative impact on job satisfaction. The findings also suggest that, perceived organizational politics partially mediate the relationship between both leadership styles and job satisfaction.</p><p>Sarwar, Mumtaz, Batool and Ikram, (2015) also did a study on the impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. This study tested the effects of both transactional and transformational leadership styles of supervisors/ managers on job satisfaction and organizational commitment of employees. Data was collected from the managers and employees working in IT research and development department in Pakistan. The results of the study revealed a positive effect of both transformational and transactional leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment, but this effect is more in case of transactional leadership.</p><p>Chien- Wen Tsai (2008) did a study on leadership style and employee’s job satisfaction in international tourist hotels. Through correlation analysis, this research found that employees are more satisfied under consideration-style-leadership than construction-style-leadership. After controlling for differences in salary, employees appear to prefer consideration-style-leadership. No matter what the leadership style is, employees’ job satisfaction does not relate towards their coworkers. Besides, employees have different perceptions on work, salary, and overall satisfaction depending on their education level and seniority.</p><p>Bulitia, Godrick (2006) did a survey of supervision styles and employee job satisfaction in commercial banks in Kenya. The findings of this study showed a high correlation between supervision styles and job satisfaction. All the correlated statements between supervision styles and job satisfaction had +1 correlation coefficient. This gave a perfect positive correlation meaning the two variables supervision styles and job satisfaction move together in the completely linear manner. However, based on the study results by Bulitia, Godrick (2006) there is need for line managers to improve the use of supervision styles and relationship with employee job satisfaction in Commercial banks in Kenya. For them to improve and succeed in their supervision styles there should be changes at the individual and organizational levels. At individual level improving line managers’ supervision styles, would involve basic education and specific job related training. They should also be encouraged to enhance their skills through continuous self-learning. At organizational level top management should provide appropriate reinforcements for line managers in learning about and improving their supervision styles (Bulitia, Godrick, 2006).</p><p>Ayodele, Ekemode and Kajimo-Shakantu (2020) investigated the job satisfaction levels of real estate firms’ employees and the relationship between employees’ personal and demographic characteristics and their job satisfaction levels. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The result showed that financial consideration/personal accomplishment was the most important factor influencing employees’ level of satisfaction, followed by work environment skill variety/organizational culture, feedback/fairness, work passion and supervision/workload/work-life balance. The results of the analysis also showed that demographic factors such as age, marital status, academic qualification, management level, years spent under the current line manager, remuneration and number of firm branches had a significant relationship with job satisfaction.</p><p>Park (2020) did a study to investigate the direct effects of supervisor satisfaction, public service motivation, and job characteristics on job satisfaction and the indirect effects mediated by organizational commitment. The survey data used for the empirical analysis was collected from central government agencies in the Republic of Korea. The study found that all three factors indirectly affect job satisfaction through organizational commitment. Only job characteristics were found to directly affect job satisfaction (Park, 2020).</p><p>Another study done by Abdelmoula and Boudabbous (2021) with the aim of identifying the factors that affect the job satisfaction of professional accountants. The study examined the relative effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on job satisfaction among accounting professionals using the principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple regression methods of data analysis. The results of the study showed that three intrinsic factors, namely achievement, the work itself, recognition, along with four extrinsic ones, i.e., salary, relationship with supervisor and co-workers, working conditions, and the company policy, significantly affect the job satisfaction. However, promotion, growth and recognition do not have a significant effect on job satisfaction.</p><p>The study by Hussain and Diaz, (2021) identified factors affecting employee job satisfaction in the University of Karachi using a survey questionnaire data. The study found that a generous rewards and compensation packages lead to job satisfaction and are affected by promotion and job security. Good working relationship with co-workers also contributes to employee job satisfaction. The study also found that good working environment also contributes to employee motivation, and is influenced by better facilities, and training and development. Finally, good supervision provides motivation that enhances the quality of output and employee performance.</p><p>Jędrzejczak-Gas and Wyrwa (2020) conducted a study to analyze and evaluate environmental factors shaping job satisfaction in a company from the TSL industry. For the study the correlation between general job satisfaction and particular factors of job satisfaction was examined. The values of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and Kendall’s tau coefficients were also calculated. The results of the study show that the two most important factors necessary to achieve job satisfaction are access to information necessary for proper performance of work and independence in performing the entrusted tasks.</p><p>Okuwa (2019) examined the determinants of job satisfaction and job turnover intention of the workers of selected banks in Ibadan. Multiple sampling methods were used to select the sample (purposive sampling method was employed to select 12 banks that have the highest number of branches in Ibadan, while random sampling technique was used to select 20 respondents from each of the bank). The results showed that adequacy of salary, safety in work place, possibility of promotion, and interpersonal relations among the staff were the factors that enhanced job satisfaction. However, long working hours, job insecurity and conflicts between office and family schedules reduced the job satisfaction of the bankers.</p><p>Using an explanatory research design with a quantitative research approach Mekonin and Teklu (2021) did a study to investigate the determinants of employee job satisfaction in the case of kirkos sub-city of Addis Ababa city administration. The data for the study was collected using a structured close-ended questions from a sample of 310 randomly selected employees and was analyzed using inferential statistics with the aid of Statistical Packages for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 23.0. Multiple regression and ANOVA analysis techniques were also used to explain the nature and effects between employees’ job satisfaction and (Gender, Age, Academic level, Work experience, Work position, pay and benefit, working environment, promotion opportunity, relation with supervisors, trust in leadership). The study found that there is a significant effect with pay and benefit, working environment, Promotion opportunities, relation with supervisors, work experience, and trust in leadership to employees’ job satisfaction and regression analysis result indicated that 81.6% of the variation on the employees’ job satisfaction can be explained by the composite measure the independent variables.</p><p>Senek. et al. (2020) analyzed data from a cross-sectional mixed-methods survey to investigate the Determinants of nurse job dissatisfaction – findings from a cross-sectional survey analysis in the UK . Logistic regression analysis of the data was done in order to determine what impacts job dissatisfaction. The study found that nearly two-thirds of nurses were dissatisfied and demoralized.</p><p>Monica, Devi and Mohapatra (2020) did a study on Determinants of Job Satisfaction.  Using a sample of 150 respondents and data collected using questionnaire method the study examined whether job characteristics (JC) and individual characteristics (IC) have an effect on worker’s job satisfaction (JS). The result suggest that job characteristics and self-efficacy are significant predictors of job satisfaction (JS).</p><p>Khaira, Afifah; Shariff, and Sima, (2021) did a study on the determinants of employee job satisfaction in Malaysia . This study aimed to determine demographic factors (gender and living areas), education and skills, work environment and compensation as the determinants of employee job satisfaction. Data collected from 132 employees from various sectors in Malaysia was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation and the Ordinal Logistic Regression. From the study it was concluded that living area, education qualification and skills and compensation are significant and considered important factors to meet their job satisfaction compared to gender and work environment.</p><p>Ranatunga, (2020) did a study to identify the relationship between pay, promotion, supervision, co-workers and work itself of job satisfaction and job performance among employees in classified hotels. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 150 non–executive employees selected using the convenience sampling method. Frequencies, univariate analysis, Pearson’s correlation, T-test and multiple regression analysis as well as multivariate analysis were used in the study. The study concluded that there is a significant positive relationship between selected factors of job satisfaction and job performance. The results of the correlation coefficient showed that pay, promotion, co-workers, supervision, work itself has a significant positive relationship with job performance and it emphasized that pay and co-workers have a strong relationship with job performance. According to the multiple regression analysis, the model was strongly fitted to the data and 40.6% variance of job performance was explained by pay, promotion, co-workers, supervision and work itself of job satisfaction.</p><p>Parveen, Maimani, and Kassim (2016) did a study to examine the effects of demographic characteristics on the QWL dimensions and satisfaction, and the relationships between the QWL dimensions and satisfaction, and between satisfaction and retention among nurses and other health care professionals Saudi Arabia.  A sample of 360 nurses and other health care professionals was collected in Jeddah, in Saudi Arabia and the data collected was analysed using multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modeling were used to test the hypotheses. The results of the study show that there is a significant difference between demographic and QWL dimensions and satisfaction. Satisfaction with personal growth and salary package were found to have significant positive impacts on overall retention.</p><p>Jigme, and Namgyal, (2021) did a study to determine the relationship between the determinants of job satisfaction such as work environment, pay and allowances, promotion, training and development, and job satisfaction in the Bhutanese context. Data from a sample of 76 civil servants were collected through a questionnaire survey and Google form and analyzed using SPSS 23. The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to find out the relationship between the independent variables (determinants of job satisfaction) and a dependent variable (job satisfaction). Linear regression and multiple regression analysis were also performed to understand the strength and types of relationship. The results of Pearson correlation and regression analysis indicate that the work environment (rp = 0.603, p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.364, B = 0.460), and training and development (rp = 0.583, p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.340, B = 0.383) have strong significant positive relationships with job satisfaction. However, other determinants such as pay and allowances (rp = 0.436, p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.190, B = 0.283) and promotion (rp = 0.395, p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.156, B = 0.288) have moderate relationships with job satisfaction. The result for multiple regression analysis shows that all the determinants have a strong correlation (R = 0.624, R 2 = 0.481, p < 0.01) with job satisfaction and these determinants determine 48.1 percent of the total satisfaction level perceived by the employee. The findings indicate that the work environment is the strongest predictor of job satisfaction as compared to other determinants.</p><p>Mensah, Amrago, Asare, Yeboah and Donkor (2020) did a study to investigate the factors affecting job satisfaction amongst workers of the poultry sub-sector: a test of equity theory in the Dormaa Municipality in the Bono Region of Ghana. The multistage sampling technique was employed in collecting data from 100 poultry workers with the aid of a structured questionnaire. The logit model was employed in modeling the factors affecting job satisfaction. The empirical findings reveal that occupational level, pay, and relationships with co-workers were the statistically significant determinants of job satisfaction.</p><p>Subarto, Solihin, and Qurbani, (2021) did a study on the determinants of job satisfaction and its implications for the lecturers performance. The purpose of the study was to examine the positive effects of leadership style, work environment, and organizational climate on lecturer performance through Pamulang University’s job satisfaction.  The quantitative research method was used and data was collected using survey questionnaires distributed to a sample of 135 respondents selected using a proportional random sampling. Statistical analysis was done using the partial least squares (PLS). From the results of the analysis it was found that leadership style, work environment, and organizational climate have an impact on job satisfaction. Leadership style, work environment, and organizational atmosphere also affect the performance of lecturers. Job satisfaction affects the performance of lecturers and can mediate the influence of leadership style, work environment, and organizational climate on lecturer performance.</p><p>From this study it is concluded that the factors that contribute to the positive morale and attitude also result in a higher degree of job satisfaction (Saranya, 2014). The review has shown that the major determinants of job satisfaction are basically nine facets which are pay, promotion, supervision, fringe benefits, contingent rewards, operating procedures, co-workers, nature of works and communication. Job Satisfaction is thus derived from and is the result of many interrelated factors which cannot be completely isolated from one another for analytical purposes. Job Satisfaction is the essential component for employee motivation and encouragement towards better performance (Vroom, 1964). A highly satisfied work force is absolutely necessary for achieving a high level of performance in an organization. Satisfied employees are more likely to be friendly and responsive which attracts customers while dissatisfied employees can lead to customer dissatisfaction (Mahmud, Hasan, and Asif, 2014). It is therefore necessary for organizations to ensure that the above determinants are provided at the required levels to ensure optimum satisfaction of employees. Of all the major job satisfaction areas, satisfaction with the nature of the work itself—which includes job challenge, autonomy, variety, and scope—best predicts overall job satisfaction, as well as other important outcomes like employee retention (Fried & Ferris, 1987; Parisi & Weiner, 1999 as quoted in Ram, (2013).</p><ul><li>Abdelmoula, L & Boudabbous, S. (2021). Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Accounting Professionals in Tunisia. Open access peer-reviewed chapter. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99331.</li><li>Akhila, N. (2018). “Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment – A Study in the Construction Sector in India” (2018).Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 2090.  https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/2090</li><li>Arian, M., Soleimani, M., &  Oghazian, M. B. (2018). Job satisfaction and the factors affecting satisfaction in nurse educators: A systematic review. Journal of Professional Nursing . Volume 34, Issue 5, September–October 2018, Pages 389-399.            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.07.004</li><li>Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice , Kogan page         Ltd.</li><li>Artz, B. & Kaya, I., (2014). The impact of job security on job satisfaction in economic contractions versus expansions, Applied Economics, 46:24, 2873-2890, DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.914148</li><li>Bakotic, D., & Babic, T. B. (2013, February). Relationship between Working Conditions and Job  Satisfaction: The Case of Croatian Shipbuilding Company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2), 206-213.</li><li>Bakotic, D. (2016). Relationship between job satisfaction and organisational performance.            J ournal of Economic Research. Volume 29, 2016 – Issue 1: Including Special Section:            7th International scientific conference by Juraj Dobrila University of Pula and Istrian    Development Age.</li><li>Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management , 17 , 99–120;</li><li>Barney, J. B., Corte, V. D., Sciarelli, M. & Arikan, K. (2012). The role of resource- based theory in strategic management studies: managerial implications and hints for research. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259501668_</li><li>Brudney, J. L & Coundrey, S. E. (1993). ‘Pay for performance: Explaining the differences in managerial motivation. Public Productivity Manage. Rev., 17(2): 129-144.</li><li>Bulitia, Godrick M (2006). A survey of supervision styles and employee job Satisfaction in commercial banks in Kenya. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/22710</li><li>Calvin Mzwenhlanhla Mabaso and Bongani Innocent Dlamini, 2017. Impact of Compensation and Benefits on Job Satisfaction. Research Journal of Business Management , 11: 80-90. DOI:10.3923/rjbm.2017.80.90 Cheginy, Z., Isfahani, H. M., Mohseni, M., Khakian, M., & Khosravizadeh, O. (2014). Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction of Employee: a Case Study. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281269958</li><li>Chi, T. (1994). Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal , 15 (4), 271–290.</li><li>Chien- Wen Tsai (2008), Leadership style and employee’s job satisfaction in international tourist hotels, in Arch G. Woodside (ed.) Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research (Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research,     Volume 2) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.293 – 332</li><li>Cole, L.E. & Cole, M.S. (2015). Employee Satisfaction And Organizational Performance: A Summary Of Key Findings From Applied Psychology. http://www.teammax.net/files/LiteratureReview.pdf</li><li>Cranny, E.R., Smith, I.I. and Stone, T.U. (2014), Determinants of job satisfaction among police officers. Int. R. Modern Sociol. 24(1): 109-16.</li><li>Dawal, S. Z & Zahari Taha, Z. (2015). The Effect of Job and Environmental Factors on Job Satisfaction in Automotive Industries, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 12:3, 267-280, DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076687</li><li>Dawson P (1987).Computer Technology and the Job of the First-line Supervisor New Technology. Work Empl ., 2(1): 47-59.</li><li>Dizgah, M. R., Chegini, M. G. & Bisokhan, R. (2012). Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Job Performance in Guilan Public Sector. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(2)1735-1741</li><li>Essays, UK. (November 2013). The relationship between supervisor and employee and job satisfaction. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/management/the-relationship-between-supervisor-and-employee-and-job-satisfaction-management- essay.php?vref=1</li><li>Evans, J. R., & Jack, E. P. (2003). Validating key results linkages in the Baldrige Performance Excellence Model. The Quality Management Journal, 10, 7–24.</li><li>Gibson, E.B. (2012), Introduction to job satisfaction and employees performance in the west indies.</li><li>Greenberg, J. (2008). Behavior in Organizations (Nineth Edition). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.</li><li>Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: an analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied psychology , 53(4), 541-555.</li><li>Guest, D. E., Michie, J., Sheehan, M. & Conway, N. (1997). Employment Relations, HRM and Business Performance , Chattered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.</li><li>Hareem, H., (2013). Human Resource Management, Framework Integrated . Amman: Hamed Publishing House and Distribution. pp. 387. ISBN 978-9959- 32-721-7.</li><li>Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time. How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review . 46. (1): 53-62.</li><li>Hussain, S & Diaz, J. F. (2021). Determinants Of Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence From The University Of Karachi, Pakistan. JMK, VOL 22, No. 2, September 2020, 165–172 DOI: 10.9744/jmk.22.2.165–172. ISSN 1411-1438 print / ISSN 2338-8234 online</li><li>Javed, M., Balouch, R. & Hassan, F. (2014). Determinants of Job Satisfaction and its Impact on Employee Performance and Turnover Intentions. International Journal of Learning & Development ISSN 2164-4063 2014, Vol. 4, No. 2. 120-140.  Doi:10.5296/ ijld.v4i2.6094 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ ijld.v4i2.6094</li><li>Jędrzejczak-Gas, J., & Wyrwa, J. (2020). Determinants of job satisfaction in a transport company: a Polish case study. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy , 15 (3), 565–593. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.025.</li><li>Jerrell, D. Coggburn, R. Paul Battaglio Jr., Mark D. Bradbury, (2014). “Employee job satisfaction and organizational performance: The role of conflict management”, International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior , Vol. 17 Issue: 4, pp.498-530, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-17-04-2014-B005</li><li>Jigme, & Namgyal, T. (2021). Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Civil Servants in Bhutan: A Case of Wangdue Phodrang Dzongkhag Administration. Bhutan Journal of Management , 1 (1), 1-16. Retrieved from  http://www.rim.edu.bt/journal/index.php/Bhutan_journal_of_management/article/view/40</li><li>Jigme, & Namgyal, T. (2021). Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Civil Servants in Bhutan: A Case of Wangdue Phodrang Dzongkhag Administration. Bhutan Journal of Management , 1 (1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.rim.edu.bt/journal/index.php/Bhutan_journal_of_management/article/view/40</li><li>Ketchen, D. & Short, J. (2012). Strategic Management: Evaluation and Execution. v. 1.0. Retried  from: https://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/strategic-management-evaluation-and-execution.pdf</li><li>Khan, A.H. Nawaz, M. M; Aleem, M. & Hamed, W. (2012). Impact of job satisfaction on  employee performance: An empirical study of autonomous Medical Institutions of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management , Vol. 6 (7), pp. 2697-2705, 22 February, 2012. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM11.2222. ISSN 1993-8233 ©2012 Academic Journals</li><li>Khan, T. & Mishra, G. P. (2013). Promotion As Job Satisfaction, A Study On Colleges Of Muscat, Sultanate Of Oman. European Journal of Business and Management ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online) Vol.5, No.5, 56-63</li><li>Khaira, I., Afifah, N., Shariff, M., & Sima, N. Determinants of Employee Job Satisfaction in  Malaysia. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management , [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p.            104-108, apr. 2021. Available at:    <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajrbm/article/view/13053>. Date accessed: 22  june 2022.</li><li>Kosteas, V. D. (2007).  Job Satisfaction and Promotions. Cleveland State University.  https://academic.csuohio.edu/kosteas_b/Job%20Satisfaction%20and%20Promotions.pdf</li><li>Lane, K., Esser, J., Holte, B., & Anne, M. M. (2010). A study of nurse faculty job satisfaction in community colleges in Florida. Teaching and Learning in Nursing , 5(1), 16-26.</li><li>Latif, M.S. , Ahmad, M., Qasim, M., Mushtaq, M., Ferdoos, A & Naeem, H. (2014). Impact of employee’s job satisfaction on organizational performance. European journal of business and management. 5(5) 166-17.</li><li>Luthans, F. (1985). Organizational Behavior , McGill Illinois.</li><li>Mahmud, M. T., Hasan, M. T. and Asif, A. S. M. (2014). Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A  Comparative Study in the Banking Sector of Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research. 2(1), 22- 28.</li><li>Maina, C. M., & Maina T. M., (2016). Features of Resource Based View Theory: An Effective Strategy in Outsourcing. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations  ISSN 2348-7585 (Online) Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp: (215-218), Month: October 2015 – March 2016, Available at: www.researchpublish.com  Page | 214  Research Publish Journals</li><li>Malik, M. E., Danish, R, Q & Munir, Y. (2012). The Impact of Pay and Promotion on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Higher Education Institutes of Pakistan. American Journal of  Economics June 2012, Special Issue: 6-9 DOI: 10.5923/j.economics.20120001.02</li><li>Mensah, N.O., Amrago, E.C.,  Asare, J.K., Yeboah, E., & Donkor, A.  (2020). Determinants Of Job Satisfaction Amongst Employees In The Poultry Sub-Sector Of Ghana: A Test Of Equity Theory. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce Vol. 14. Number 3-4. 2020. pages 97-104. DOI: 10.19041/Abstract/2020/3-4/11</li><li>Monica, S.B., Devi. D.,& Mohapatra, S. (2020).  Determinants of Job Satisfaction: Job or Individual Characteristics?  Solid State Technology . Vol 63 (2s)</li><li>Mosadegh Rad, A, M. M., & De Moraes, A. (2009). Factors affecting employees’ job satisfaction in public hospitals- Implications for recruitment and retention. Journal of General Management Vol. 34 No. 4 Summer 2009</li><li>Motowidlo, J. S., (2003). “ Job Performance. Handbook of Psychology ”, Industrial and  Organizational Psychology,12,pp. 39-55.</li><li>Muhammad R. A & Wajidi. F.A, (2013). Factors influencing job satisfaction in public health sector of Pakistan . Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc . (USA)</li><li>Muhammed zia Ur Rehman, M. R. (2010). Effect of job rewards on job satisfaction, moderating role of age differences: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. African Journal of  Business Management , 4((6)), 1131-1139.</li><li>Ndulue, T.I. & Ekechukwu, H.C. (2016). Impact Of Job Satisfaction On Employees Performance: A Study of Nigerian breweries Plc Kaduna state branch, Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review . 5(11)13-23</li><li>Nguyen, A, Taylor J, & Bradley, S. (2003). Relative Pay and Job Satisfaction. Some New Evidence, MPRA Paper No 1382.</li><li>Opkara, J. O. (2002). The Impact Of Salary Differential On Managerial Job Satisfaction. A Study Of The Gender Gap And Its Implications For Management Education And Practice In A   Developing Economy. Journal of Business Developing Nations , 65-92.</li><li>Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational Level Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963-974.</li><li>Ouedraogo, A. & ALeclerc, A. (2013). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Canadian Credit Union. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict. 17(1):35-50 · January 2013</li><li>Park, S. (2020). Determinants of the Job Satisfaction of Public Officials: Testing the Mediation  Effect of Organizational Commitment. Public Organiz Rev 20, 665–684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00465-6</li><li>Parveen1, M., Maimani, K. & Kassim, N.M. (2016). Quality of Work Life: The Determinants of   Job Satisfaction and Job Retention among RNs and OHPs. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 742, ISSN 1522- 4821IJEMHHR • Vol. 18, No. 2 • 2016 742</li><li>Platis, C,  Reklitis, P. & Zimeras, S. (2015). Relation between job satisfaction and job performance in healthcare services. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 175( 2015)   480 – 487. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</li><li>Porter, L. W. and Lawler, E. E. (1974). “ The Effect of Performance on Job Satisfaction.” In Edwin A. Fleishman (ed) Studies in Personal and Industrial Psychology . Third Edition,  Illinois.</li><li>Purcell, J, Kinnie, K., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. & Swart, J. (2003). People and  Performance: How People Management Impacts on Organizational Performance , CIPD, London.</li><li>Pushpakumari M. D. (2008). The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Job Performance: An Empirical    Analysis. Pp. 89-105 名城論叢 2008年6月</li><li>Ram, P. (2013). Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance in the Public Sector- A Case Study from India. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences March 2013, Vol. 2, No. 2 Pp. 16-35. ISSN: 2226-3624</li><li>Ranatunga, R. A. D. D. N. (2020). Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance in Classified Hotels. Trivalent ත් ‍ රිසංයුජ : Journal of Archaeology, Tourism & Anthropology , 1 (2), 13–35. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/tjata.v1i2.35</li><li>Raziq, A & Maulabakhsh, R.  (2015). Impact of Working Environment on Job Satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance 23 ( 2015 ) 717-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00524-9</li><li>Reisel, W. D., Probst, T. M., Chia, S-L., Maloles, C. M., & König, C. J. (2010). The effects of  job insecurity on job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, deviant behavior, and negative emotions of employees. International Studies of Management and    Organization , 40(1), 74-91.</li><li>Rukh, L., Choundhary, M. A., & Abbasi, S. A. (2015). Analysis of factors affecting employee  satisfaction: A case study from Pakistan. Work. 2015;52(1):137-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152039. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26410229</li><li>Saleem, H.  (2015). The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 172 (2015 ) 563 – 569. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273501104</li><li>Saranya , K. (2014). Influence of Job Satisfaction on Employees’ Performance – A general  Perspective. International Journal on Global Business Management and Research. Volume 2; Issue 2; March 2014 ; ISSN 2278 8425</li><li>Sarwar, A. Mumtaz, M., Batool, Z. & Ikram, S. (2015). Impact of Leadership Styles on Job  Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. International Review of Management and Business Research Vol. 4 Issue.3. 834-844</li><li>Senek, M., Robertson, S., Ryan, T. et al. Determinants of nurse job dissatisfaction – findings         from a cross-sectional survey analysis in the UK. BMC Nurs 19, 88 (2020).         https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00481-3</li><li>Silla, I., Gracia, F., & Peiro, J.M. (2005). Job insecurity and health-related outcomes among          different types of temporary workers. Econ. Ind. Democracy , 26: 89–117.</li><li>Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M, Hullin, C. L, (1969). “The measure of satisfaction in work and           Retirement ”, Rand Mc Nally</li><li>Spector, P.E., (1997),” Job satisfaction: application, assessment, causes and consequences ”,           Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, p.28.</li><li>Spector, P. (2008). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Research and Practice , 5th ed.,      John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.</li><li>Subarto, S., Solihin, D., & Qurbani, D. (2021). Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Its    Implications for the Lecturers Performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi & Bisnis, 9(2), 163 – 78. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.009.2.7</li><li>Tabassum, U., Khan, B.,  Sherani, A. W. & Khan, I. (2016). The Relationship between Job           Satisfaction and Job Performance among Employees: A Case of Commercial Banks in   Punjab City, Pakistan, 5(8), 1-17. www.pmworldjournal.net</li><li>Tariku Tefera Mekonin & Dr. Tilahun Teklu (2021). Determinants of employee job satisfaction     (the case of kirkos sub-city of addis ababa city administration). Un published MBA thesis Addis Ababa University.</li><li>Tessema, M., & Soeters, J. (2006). Challenges and prospects of HRM in developing countries. Testing the HRM-performance link</li><li>Timothy O. Ayodele, Benjamin Gbolahan Ekemode & Kahilu Kajimo-Shakantu(2020). Determinants of job satisfaction “|&rrrrt</li><li>Usman, Akbar, Ramzan (2013). Effect of Salary and Stress on Job Satisfaction of Teachers in      District Sialkot, Pakistan IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 15 , Issue 2 (Sep. – Oct. 2013), PP 68-74 e- ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-      0845.</li><li>Viñas-Bardolet, C., Velazco, J., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2013). Determinants of Job Satisfaction,     the Role of Knowledge-based work: An illustration from Spain.             https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268576689</li><li>Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation . New York: John Wiley and Sons.</li><li>Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173-194.</li><li>Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal , 5 ,   171–180.</li><li>Willem, Buelens & Jonghe , (2007). ”Impact of organizational structure on nurses’ job satisfaction: a Questionnaire survey”, International Journal of Nursing Studies , 44,pp. 1011-1020.</li><li>Woods, L. (2018). How Job Security Influences Job Satisfaction & Performance. https://work.chron.com/job-security-influences-job-satisfaction-performance-30781.html</li></ul><h2>Article Statistics</h2><p>Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.</p><p>PDF Downloads</p><ul><li>Social Science</li><li>Accounting & Finance</li><li>Political Science</li><li>Educational Management</li><li>Human Resource Management</li><li>International Relations</li><li>Public Administration</li><li>Business Management</li><li>Linguistics</li><li>Guidance and Counselling</li><li>Language and Literature</li><li>Peace and Conflict Studies</li><li>Mass Communication</li><li>Business Administration</li><li>Sport Science</li><li>Islamic Studies</li><li>Religion & Society</li><li>Urban and Regional Planning</li><li>Public Health</li></ul><p>Copyright © 2024 RSIS International</p><h2>Subscribe to Our Newsletter</h2><p>Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.</p><p>Email Address * Subscribe</p><p>Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.</p><p>To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .</p><p>Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.</p><ul><li>We're Hiring!</li><li>Help Center</li></ul><p><center><img style=

Employee Welfare Programs and Job Satisfaction: A Critical Literature Review

Profile image of International Journal of Academics & Research, IJARKE Journals

Employee welfare programs constitute any employer-provided perks and comforts beyond earnings and compensation. Employee welfare programs promote motivation and performance by increasing employee engagement. Policies pertaining to employee welfare are essential for inspiring employees to give their all when doing their jobs. The greatest productivity from employees can only be obtained by any business if those workers love and are dedicated to their work. Conversely, when workers' needs are met, they experience a sense of motivation. By offering social services and programs, job satisfaction can be increased. Work satisfaction is a complex notion that measures an employee's attitude and inner mental condition and aids in striking a balance between the relationship between the company and the employee. Contented employees are an organization's most precious asset, whereas disgruntled ones are essentially inconsequential. The main elements that must be taken into consideration for overall job satisfaction are the welfare program, flexible work schedule, supervisor-subordinate relationship, career advancement, work recognition, objective work environment, and relationships with colleagues. Employee welfare involves the provisions of various services, facilities and amenities for the benefit of the employees for improved standard of living. It is part of the efforts of management of an organization to meet the needs of their workforce to improve their productive capacity. Employee welfare is directed towards ensuring that the employees are happy and comfortable, to perform their tasks effectively. Employee welfare has been relevant in recent times for greater achievement of desired goals of various organizations. There is the need to provide a good working environment, staff quarters or accommodation, health care services, safety and appropriate remuneration. Failure of organizations to adequately take the welfare of their staff into consideration could lead to poor performance and low productivity. This paper adopted a qualitative research design which entailed a critical review of literature on the effect of employee welfare programs. The rationale for this design was to interrogate views, methods, and findings of authors on the relationships among study variables. Therefore, the study used secondary data obtained from journal articles, books, publications, and conference papers drawn globally. The review mainly used content analysis which were mentioned, and discussions specific to the study variables were identified, analyzed and critiqued. The findings revealed that there is a significant and positive relationship between job satisfaction and employee welfare programs. The health and well-being of their employees has been given a top priority by their companies, as seen by the comprehensive benefit plans and secure health care they offer. Employers facilitate employees' accumulation of unused sick days over the course of a year for use when necessary. Some firms even pay back their workers for sick days that aren't used. Many issues related to employee health exist, some of which are unavoidable, and they all affect both the overall performance of an organization and the productivity of its individual employees. Finally, it is imperative to note that some employers now recognize that addressing employee welfare is one way of positive and effective human resource management which is critical to organizational performance.

Related Papers

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | IJNRD.ORG

William Carey

Employee welfare plays a crucial role in enhancing organizational performance and fostering a positive work environment. This study explores various aspects of employee welfare measures within Coromandel International Limited, focusing on factors such as safety appliances, medical facilities, first aid services, canteen facilities, and education provisions for employee children. The research methodology involved both primary and secondary data collection, with a sample size of 100 respondents using simple random sampling techniques. Data analysis revealed high satisfaction rates among employees for medical facilities and safety appliances, while suggestions for improvement were identified in areas such as maintenance, post-retirement benefits, and education facilities. The study concludes that Coromandel International Limited demonstrates a strong commitment to employee welfare, with room for enhancements identified to further elevate employee satisfaction and organizational performance. Additionally, a comprehensive bibliography is provided, encompassing a range of scholarly sources on employee welfare and related topics, offering valuable insights for further research in this area.

factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology

Chandra Sekhar Patro

Employees&#39; play a key role in the existence and growth of any organisation, therefore their welfare is essential. During the past few years, both public sector and private sector organisations have been contributing towards the employee&#39;s benefits and also increase their efficiency. Employees&#39; welfare facilities include housing facilities, free medical facilities, retirement benefits, children and adult educational benefits, welfare measures for the employee&#39;s families, loan facilities, etc. If the organisations do not bother about the employees benefit, but expect efficient and high performance from them, it is a mere waste. So there is utmost need for the employee&#39;s welfare in any type of organisation. Organizations have to provide welfare facilities to their employees to keep their motivation levels high. A comparative study was undertaken to know the satisfaction level of the employees on the enforceability of various welfare measures in both the public and p...

IOSR Journals

Lot of changes has taken place recently with regards to employee welfare measures. Completely new methods in the way of operations of organizations could be one of the significant reasons for the same. These resulted in the off shoot of many new jobs. In this study, an attempt has been made to understand about the welfare measures being provided to employees doing contemporary jobs such as Content review processor, Candidate Relationship manager, Electronic relationship manager. Various contemporary welfare measures like psychological counseling centers, food courts, sports & entertainment facilities, transportation are being practiced by the organizations in addition to traditional employee welfare measures like PF, Gratuity, ESI etc., These welfare measures contribute a lot for the prosperity of the employees and employers.

shukri bakar

Employees’ welfare includes anything that is done for the comfort and improvement of employees and is provided over and above the wages.Welfare helps in keeping the morale and motivation of the employees high so as to retain the employees for longer duration.The welfare measures need not be in monetary terms only but in any kind/forms. Employee welfare includes monitoring of working conditions, creation of industrial harmony through infrastructure for health, industrial relations and insurance against disease, accident and unemployment for the workers and their families.

Advances in Management

Dr.Nanjundeswaraswamy T S

Employee Retention and Absenteeism are the major challenges for any organization in the current competitive world. Retaining of talents is possible through the effective implementation of Quality of Work Life (QWL) drives. Employee welfare measure is one among the QWL drive. A sample of 50 employee's responses were considered for the study and the data was analyzed using K-S Single sample Test and K-S Two-Sample Test conducted to check the stated Hypothesis and Regression analysis. Structural Equation Modeling was designed.

European Journal of Marketing and Management Sciences Eur.

Bright King

This study focused on the implications of labour welfare schemes on employee job satisfaction. The specific objectives are to: to ascertain the effect of worker's compensation on employee commitment and to assess the effect of staff recreational welfare on employee performance. The population of the study comprised 192 staff of selected banks in Enugu metropolis, Enugu State while Taro Yamane formula was used to determined the sample size of 130. The data was analysed with simple percentage analysis while all the hypotheses were tested with Simple Linear regression at 0.05 alpha level. The research made the following findings: that worker's compensation had significant positive effect on employee commitment (β =.896; t=.8.239; p>0.05) and that staff recreational welfare had significant positive effect on employee performance (β =.559; t=9.729; p<0.05). The study concluded that staff welfare is essential in creating a sense of recognition and satisfaction among the employees which improves employee job satisfaction. It was recommended among others; that human resources manager should develop systems that will ensure that there is a proper compensation plan entailing proper job evaluation processes and pay structures in the organization. This is to ensure that employees are equal pay what they deserved as a result of their input. To enhance job satisfaction among employees, organizations should offer recreation facilities and activities that are of interest to employees bearing in mind their different tastes, gender, age and among others. This will encourage the employees to engage in recreation activities that they enjoy most.

Dr Pravin V Yadav

The present study is an attempt to identify the statutory and non-statutory Labour Welfare Measures (LWM) adopted by different industries and its relationship between employee satisfactions and workplace. This paper stated a comprehensive review of various studies conducted by experts and researchers of all over the globe on Labour Welfare Measures (LWM) and it's determinants and its' relationship between employee satisfactions at workplace. The paper sought to present the summary of work done by different researchers in the field of labour welfare.

Mark Angelo

The present study is made an attempt to identify the employee welfare measures adopted in IT industry. Employee welfare means anything done for the comfort and improvement of the employees over and above the wages paid which is not a necessity of the industry. The basic purpose of employee welfare is to enrich the life of employees and keep them happy. Employees spend at least half their time at work or getting to it, or leaving it. They know that they contribute to the organization when they are reasonably free from worry and they feel that when they are in trouble/ problems, they are due to get something back from the organization. People are entitled to be treated as full human beings with personal needs, hopes and anxieties.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Ogungbayo Olufunmi

International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH

JOYJIT SANYAL

Ranjita Ekka

ufoma ijeoma

Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Publishing India Group

Indian Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine

Mridul Mishra

IAEME Publication

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation

Buddhika Suraweera

grace munisi

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

VARADAHU ARAVAMUDHAN

SAMRIDDHI : A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology

Dr.(Prof.) Kiran S Kakade

sulthan mohideen

Indus Foundation International Journals UGC Approved

MASTER IN SOCIAL WORK THESIS, UNIBADAN

Sulaimon Is-haq

jejji chanti

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology

Neela Venkatesh

Ahovi Godfred

Employee Assistance Quarterly

Rick Csiernik

LASU Journal of Employment Relations &amp; Human Resource Management

Olaniyi Dunmade

IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267)

monoshree mahanta

m jagadeesan

Gordon Spence

Journal ijmr.net.in(UGC Approved)

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Factors affecting the indoor air quality and occupants’ thermal comfort in urban agglomeration regions in the hot and humid climate of pakistan.

factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

1. Introduction

Novelty of the study, 2. literature review, 2.1. outdoor and indoor air quality, 2.2. air conditioning systems, 2.2.1. acs with high-efficiency particulate air (hepa) filters, 2.2.2. acs with multi-stage filtration systems, 2.2.3. acs with activated carbon filter, 2.3. indoor air quality assessment, 3. materials and methods, 3.1. site description, 3.2. conceptual framework, 3.3. tool and database, 3.4. data acquisition, 3.5. data mining, 4. analysis and results, 4.1. adaptive thermal comfort, 4.2. obtained datasets from ashrae global thermal comfort database ii, 4.3. thermal comfort assessment, 5. discussion, 5.1. climate change and its impact on thermal comfort, 5.2. limitations, 5.3. future recommendations, 5.4. contribution to the knowledge, 6. conclusions, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest, abbreviations.

IAQIndoor air quality
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency of Pakistan
WHOWorld Health Organization
MVSMechanical ventilation systems
NVSNatural ventilation systems
PACPortable air cleaners
ACAir conditioners
HEPAHigh-efficiency particulate air
UTCIUniversal Thermal Climate Index
PMVPredicted mean vote
  • Parekh, P.P.; Khwaja, H.A.; Khan, A.R.; Naqvi, R.R.; Malik, A.; Shah, S.A.; Khan, K.; Hussain, G. Ambient air quality of two metropolitan cities of Pakistan and its health implications. Atmos. Environ. 2001 , 35 , 5971–5978. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Anjum, M.S.; Ali, S.M.; Imad-ud-din, M.; Subhani, M.A.; Anwar, M.N.; Nizami, A.S.; Ashraf, U.; Khokhar, M.F. An Emerged Challenge of Air Pollution and Ever-Increasing Particulate Matter in Pakistan: A Critical Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021 , 402 , 123943. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Barn, P.; Larson, T.; Noullett, M.; Kennedy, S.; Copes, R.; Brauer, M. Infiltration of forest fire and residential wood smoke: An evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2008 , 18 , 503–511. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sharma, R.; Balasubramanian, R. Indoor human exposure to size-fractionated aerosols during the 2015 Southeast Asian smoke haze and assessment of exposure mitigation strategies. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017 , 12 , 114026. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Belias, E.; Licina, D. European residential ventilation: Investigating the impact on health and energy demand. Energy Build. 2024 , 304 , 113839. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Considine, B.; Gallagher, J.; Kumar, P.; McNabola, A. Long-term assessment of energy consumption reduction in a building ventilation system with passive particulate matter control technology in the fresh air intake. Energy Build. 2024 , 309 , 114067. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Shen, L.; Skitmore, M. A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014 , 32 , 66–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ghauri, B.; Salam, M.; Mirza, M.I. An assessment of air quality in Karachi, Pakistan. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1994 , 32 , 37–45. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Colbeck, I.; Nasir, Z.A.; Ali, Z. The state of ambient air quality in Pakistan—A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2010 , 17 , 49–63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vahlsing, C.; Smith, K.R. Global review of national ambient air quality standards for PM 10 and SO 2 (24 h). Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2012 , 5 , 393–399. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chow, J.C. Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1995 , 45 , 320–382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Özden, Ö.; Döǧeroǧlu, T.; Kara, S. Assessment of ambient air quality in Eskişehir, Turkey. Environ. Int. 2008 , 34 , 678–687. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Anwar, M.N.; Shabbir, M.; Tahir, E.; Iftikhar, M.; Saif, H.; Tahir, A.; Murtaza, M.A.; Khokhar, M.F.; Rehan, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; et al. Emerging challenges of air pollution and particulate matter in China, India, and Pakistan and mitigating solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021 , 416 , 125851. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • IQ Air. World Air Quality Report. 2022. Available online: https://www.iqair.com/newsroom/world-air-quality-report-press-release-2022 (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  • Jones, A. Indoor air quality and health. Atmos. Environ. 1999 , 33 , 4535–4564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gil-Baez, M.; Lizana, J.; Becerra Villanueva, J.A.; Molina-Huelva, M.; Serrano-Jimenez, A.; Chacartegui, R. Natural ventilation in classrooms for healthy schools in the COVID era in Mediterranean climate. Build. Environ. 2021 , 206 , 108345. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ahmed, T.; Kumar, P.; Mottet, L. Natural ventilation in warm climates: The challenges of thermal comfort, heatwave resilience and indoor air quality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 138 , 110669. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tran, P.T.M.; Adam, M.G.; Balasubramanian, R. Mitigation of indoor human exposure to airborne particles of outdoor origin in an urban environment during haze and non-haze periods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021 , 403 , 123555. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Ramalho, O.; Wyart, G.; Mandin, C.; Blondeau, P.; Cabanes, P.A.; Leclerc, N.; Mullot, J.U.; Boulanger, G.; Redaelli, M. Association of carbon dioxide with indoor air pollutants and exceedance of health guideline values. Build. Environ. 2015 , 93 , 115–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wei, W.; Ramalho, O.; Mandin, C. Indoor air quality requirements in green building certifications. Build. Environ. 2015 , 92 , 10–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wei, G.; Yu, X.; Fang, L.; Wang, Q.; Tanaka, T.; Amano, K.; Yang, X. A review and comparison of the indoor air quality requirements in selected building standards and certifications. Build. Environ. 2022 , 226 , 109709. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tran, P.T.M.; Adam, M.G.; Tham, K.W.; Schiavon, S.; Pantelic, J.; Linden, P.F.; Sofianopoulou, E.; Sekhar, S.C.; Cheong, D.K.W.; Balasubramanian, R. Assessment and mitigation of personal exposure to particulate air pollution in cities: An exploratory study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021 , 72 , 103052. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kalimeri, K.K.; Saraga, D.E.; Lazaridis, V.D.; Legkas, N.A.; Missia, D.A.; Tolis, E.I.; Bartzis, J.G. Indoor air quality investigation of the school environment and estimated health risks: Two-season measurements in primary schools in Kozani, Greece. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2016 , 7 , 1128–1142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chiara Pietrogrande, M.; Casari, L.; Demaria, G.; Russo, M. Indoor Air Quality in Domestic Environments during Periods Close to Italian COVID-19 Lockdown. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health Artic. Res. Public Health 2021 , 18 , 4060. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Becerra, J.A.; Lizana, J.; Gil, M.; Barrios-Padura, A.; Blondeau, P.; Chacartegui, R. Identification of potential indoor air pollutants in schools. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 242 , 118420. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Fakhri, Y.; Akhlaghi, M.; Daraei, H.; Hedarinejad, Z.; Bahreini, A.; Mahmudiono, T.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. The concentration of potentially toxic elements (zinc, iron, manganese) bound PM 2.5 in the indoor air of urban schools: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2023 , 16 , 77–84. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Abdel-Salam, M.M.M. Investigation of PM 2.5 and carbon dioxide levels in urban homes. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2015 , 65 , 930–936. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Abdel-Salam, M.M.M. Seasonal variation in indoor concentrations of air pollutants in residential buildings. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2021 , 71 , 761–777. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Karuppasamy, M.B.; Natesan, U.; Karuppannan, S.; Chandrasekaran, L.N.; Hussain, S.; Almohamad, H.; Al Dughairi, A.A.; Al-Mutiry, M.; Alkayyadi, I.; Abdo, H.G. Multivariate Urban Air Quality Assessment of Indoor and Outdoor Environments at Chennai Metropolis in South India. Atmosphere 2022 , 13 , 1627. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Baloch, R.M.; Maesano, C.N.; Christoffersen, J.; Banerjee, S.; Gabriel, M.; Csobod, É.; de Oliveira Fernandes, E.; Annesi-Maesano, I.; Szuppinger, P.; Prokai, R.; et al. Indoor air pollution, physical and comfort parameters related to schoolchildren’s health: Data from the European SINPHONIE study. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 , 739 , 139870. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Godwin, C.; Batterman, S. Indoor air quality in Michigan schools. Indoor Air 2007 , 17 , 109–121. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Szabados, M.; Csákó, Z.; Kotlík, B.; Kazmarová, H.; Kozajda, A.; Jutraz, A.; Kukec, A.; Otorepec, P.; Dongiovanni, A.; Di Maggio, A.; et al. Indoor air quality and the associated health risk in primary school buildings in Central—The InAirQ study. Indoor Air 2021 , 31 , 989–1003. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Balasubramanian, R.; Sheng, S.L. Characteristics of indoor aerosols in residential homes in urban locations: A case study in Singapore. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2007 , 57 , 981–990. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • An, Y.; Xia, T.; You, R.; Lai, D.; Liu, J.; Chen, C. A reinforcement learning approach for control of window behavior to reduce indoor PM 2.5 concentrations in naturally ventilated buildings. Build. Environ. 2021 , 200 , 107978. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Student Lesson. Available online: https://studentlesson.com/air-conditioning-system-definition-functions-components-types/#:~:text=An%20air%20conditioning%20system%20is,for%20human%20and%20other%20animals (accessed on 9 May 2023).
  • Yu, B.F.; Hu, Z.B.; Liu, M.; Yang, H.L.; Kong, Q.X.; Liu, Y.H. Review of research on air-conditioning systems and indoor air quality control for human health. Int. J. Refrig. 2009 , 32 , 3–20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • LAC Temperature Control. Available online: https://lacltd.uk.com/7-benefits-of-air-conditioning-in-the-home (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  • Linquip Technews. Available online: https://www.linquip.com/blog/advantages-of-air-conditioner/ (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  • Berkeys Plumbing. A/C. Electrical. Available online: https://www.berkeys.com/2016/12/22/advantage-disadvantage-air-conditioner/ (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  • Comfy Home Heating Cooling. Available online: https://www.comfyhome.com.au/pros-cons-of-air-conditioner/ (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  • Kek, H.Y.; Mohd Saupi, S.B.; Tan, H.; Dzarfan Othman, M.H.; Nyakuma, B.B.; Goh, P.S.; Hamood Altowayti, W.A.; Qaid, A.; Abdul Wahab, N.H.; Lee, C.H.; et al. Ventilation Strategies for Mitigating Airborne Infection in Healthcare Facilities: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis (1993 to 2022). Energy Build. 2023 , 295 , 113323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/what-hepa-filter (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  • Atmostemp Heating, Air Conditioning Plumbing|A Service Experts Company. Available online: https://www.atmostempheating.com/blog/can-you-install-hepa-filters-in-your-hvac-system-in-voorhees#:~:text=There%20are%20a%20few%20different,3%2 (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • Protect COVID-19 National Core Study. Available online: https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/covid19-national-project/2023/01/09/how-we-know-that-hepa-filter-based-air-cleaners-are-likely-to-be-beneficial-for-reducing-transmission-of-respirat (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • Solberg, S.; Controlling Critical Environments with HEPA-Filtered Air-Conditioning. Dantherm Group Climate Solution. 2023. Available online: https://www.danthermgroup.com/en-gb/dantherm/controlling-critical-environments-with-hepa-filtered-air-conditioning (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  • Freudenberg Innovating Together. Available online: https://www.freudenberg-filter.com/en/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • Freudenberg. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20231211084951/https://www.freudenberg-filter.com/en/filtration-know-how/protection-against-viruses/industrial-filtration/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • Sanalife. Available online: https://www.sanalifewellness.com/technologies/multi-stage-air-filtration (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • HVAC Training Shop. Available online: https://hvactrainingshop.com/activated-carbon-air-filters/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • HaoAirTech. Available online: http://www.haoairtech.com/products/pleated-active-carbon-filter/ (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  • Hassan, H.; Mishra, A.K.; Wemken, N.; O’Dea, P.; Cowie, H.; McIntyre, B.; Coggins, A.M. Deep energy renovations’ impact on indoor air quality and thermal comfort of residential dwellings in Ireland—ARDEN project. Build. Environ. 2024 , 259 , 111637. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sha, X.; Ma, Z.; Sethuvenkatraman, S.; Li, W. A novel rule mining method for knowledge discovery of relationships among indoor air quality, HVAC operation and occupants’ activities. Build. Environ. 2024 , 260 , 111670. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Takebayashi, H. Effects of air temperature, humidity, and wind velocity distribution on indoor cooling load and outdoor human thermal environment at urban scale. Energy Build. 2022 , 257 , 111792. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jara-Baeza, F.; Rajagopalan, P.; Andamon, M.M. A holistic assessment of indoor environmental quality perception in Australian high-rise social housing. Energy Build. 2023 , 284 , 112859. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Belias, E.; Licina, D. Influence of outdoor air pollution on European residential ventilative cooling potential. Energy Build. 2023 , 289 , 113044. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • An, Y.; Chen, C. Energy-efficient control of indoor PM 2.5 and thermal comfort in a real room using deep reinforcement learning. Energy Build. 2023 , 295 , 113340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Colclough, S.; Salaris, C. Quantifying overheating in nZEB Irish residential buildings. An analysis of recorded interior temperatures of Irish newbuild and retrofit residential buildings against CIBSE, Passive House and WHO overheating criteria and recorded occupant satisfaction. Energy Build. 2024 , 303 , 113571. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Arriazu-Ramos, A.; Ruiz, G.R.; Izquierdo, J.J.P.; Gutiérrez, A.S.O.; Monge-Barrio, A. From urban microclimate to indoor overheating: Analysis of residential typologies during typical climate series and extreme warm summer. Energy Build. 2023 , 299 , 113620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Berneiser, J.; Auerswald, S.; Maier, D.; Gölz, S.; Carbonare, N.; Pflug, T. Feeling the breeze? Ventilation practices and occupant requirements for mechanical ventilation in residential buildings. Energy Build. 2024 , 302 , 113702. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • CBE Center for the Built Environment. Low-Energy Occupant-Responsive HVAC Controls and Systems. 2023. Available online: https://cbe.berkeley.edu/research/low-energy-occupant-responsive-hvac/ (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  • CBE Center for the Built Environment. Low-Cost MEMS-Based Ultrasonic Airflow Sensors for Rooms and HVAC Systems. 2023. Available online: https://cbe.berkeley.edu/research/low-cost-mems-airflow-sensors-rooms-and-hvac/ (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  • World Maps of Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification. Available online: https://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/present.htm (accessed on 12 June 2023).
  • Google Earth Pro. Available online: https://earth.google.com/web/@31.5203696,74.3587473,64524.36147026a,0d,35y,-0h,0t,0r (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  • Draw.io. Available online: https://www.drawio.com/ (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  • Betti, G.; Tartarini, F.; Nguyen, C.; Schiavon, S. CBE Clima Tool: A free and open-source web application for climate analysis tailored to sustainable building design. arXiv 2022 , arXiv:2212.04609. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Földváry Ličina, V.; Cheung, T.; Zhang, H.; de Dear, R.; Parkinson, T.; Arens, E.; Chun, C.; Schiavon, S.; Luo, M.; Brager, G.; et al. Development of the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Build. Environ. 2018 , 142 , 502–512. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • CBE Clima Tool. Available online: https://clima.cbe.berkeley.edu/ (accessed on 24 May 2023).
  • Ozarisoy, B. Supplementary data for Assessing the Domestic Energy Use and Thermal Comfort of Occupants in a Post-war Social Housing Development Estate in Famagusta, Northern Cyprus. University of East London. 2022. Available online: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8q774 (accessed on 12 June 2023).
  • Ozarisoy, B.; Altan, H. Regression forecasting of ‘neutral’ adaptive thermal comfort: A field study investigation in the south-eastern Mediterranean climate of Cyprus. Build. Environ. 2021 , 202 , 108013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vadoudi, K.; Marinhas, S. Development of Psychrometric diagram for the energy efficiency of Air Handling Units. AIVC Publications. 2019. Available online: https://www.aivc.org/resource/development-psychrometric-diagram-energy-efficiency-air-handling-units (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  • Jiang, Y.; Chen, Q. Study of natural ventilation in buildings by large eddy simulation. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2001 , 89 , 1155–1178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, Y.; Delsante, A.; Symons, J. Prediction of natural ventilation in buildings with large openings. Build. Environ. 2000 , 35 , 191–206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bröde, P.; Fiala, D.; Błażejczyk, K.; Holmér, I.; Jendritzky, G.; Kampmann, B.; Tinz, B.; Havenith, G. Deriving the operational procedure for the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012 , 56 , 481–494. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Błazejczyk, K.; Broede, P.; Fiala, D.; Havenith, G.; Holmér, I.; Jendritzky, G.; Kampmann, B.; Kunert, A. Principles of the new universal thermal climate index (UTCI) and its application to bioclimatic research in European scale. Misc. Geogr. 2010 , 14 , 91–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II Visualization. Available online: https://cbe-berkeley.shinyapps.io/comfortdatabase/ (accessed on 28 May 2023).
  • Hubert, M.; Vandervieren, E. An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2008 , 52 , 5186–5201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cheung, T.; Schiavon, S.; Parkinson, T.; Li, P.; Brager, G. Analysis of the accuracy on PMV–PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Build. Environ. 2019 , 153 , 205–217. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Carlucci, S.; Erba, S.; Pagliano, L.; de Dear, R. ASHRAE Likelihood of Dissatisfaction: A new right-here and right-now thermal comfort index for assessing the Likelihood of dissatisfaction according to the ASHRAE adaptive comfort model. Energy Build. 2021 , 250 , 111286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, S.; Yao, R.; Du, C.; Essah, E.; Li, B. Analysis of outlier detection rules based on the ASHRAE global thermal comfort database. Build. Environ. 2023 , 234 , 110155. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rupp, R.F.; Parkinson, T.; Kim, J.; Toftum, J.; de Dear, R. The impact of occupant’s thermal sensitivity on adaptive thermal comfort model. Build. Environ. 2022 , 207 , 108517. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rawal, R.; Shukla, Y.; Vardhan, V.; Asrani, S.; Schweiker, M.; de Dear, R.; Garg, V.; Mathur, J.; Prakash, S.; Diddi, S.; et al. Adaptive thermal comfort model based on field studies in five climate zones across India. Build. Environ. 2022 , 219 , 109187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Parkinson, T.; de Dear, R.; Brager, G. Nudging the adaptive thermal comfort model. Energy Build. 2020 , 206 , 109559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ji, W.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, B. Development of the Predicted Thermal Sensation (PTS) model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database. Energy Build. 2020 , 211 , 109780. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

CityAnnual Average Concentration of PM
Lahore107.5 µg/m
Faisalabad104.6 µg/m
Gujranwala102.9 µg/m
Rawalpindi98.6 µg/m
Karachi74.9 µg/m
Particulate matter (PM )0.62–3.61 µg/m
Particulate matter (PM )0.74–4.30 µg/m
Total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) 84.17–306.32 µg/m
Particulate matter (PM )2.04–34.86 µg/m
Particulate matter (PM )1.14–15.76 µg/m
Total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) 206.99–589.71 µg/m
Type of PTEConcentration
Zn17.32 ng/m
Fe14.49 ng/m
Mn7.40 ng/m
Rank Order:
Zn (17.32 ng/m ) > Fe (14.49 ng/m ) > Mn (7.40 ng/m )
Particulate matter (PM )119.4 ± 30.9 µg/m
Particulate matter (PM )85.2 ± 25.8 µg/m
Carbon monoxide (CO)1.6 ± 0.8 ppm
Carbon dioxide (CO )692.4 ± 144.6 ppm
Particulate matter (PM )98.8 ± 21.8 µg/m
Particulate Matter (PM )67.8 ± 14.9 µg/m
Carbon monoxide (CO)0.5 ± 0.5 ppm
Carbon dioxide (CO )558.2 ± 66.2 ppm
MethodProsCons
Air Conditioning System
Particle TypeSize
Smoke0.01–1 micron
Dust0.05–100 microns
Bacteria0.35–10 microns
Dust mite debris0.5–50 microns
Spores from plants6–100 microns
Human hair70–100 microns
Mold20–200 microns
Project NameLow-Energy Occupant-Responsive HVAC Controls and Systems
Project ObjectiveTo devise, incorporate, and exhibit HVAC control and personal comfort system (PCS) technologies, along with plausible stages for implementation.
Technologies Developed
Key Innovations
Results
Significance to IndustryA capability to achieve a 39% reduction in natural gas consumption and a 30% reduction in electricity consumption for HVAC systems within commercial office spaces in the state of California.
Research Approach
Notable Findings
Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Field Study Results
Code Change PotentialAssessed the potential for modifications in code standards pertaining to personal comfort system (PCS) and variable air volume (VAV) controls, considering both state and national guidelines for energy efficiency and occupant comfort.
Project NameLow-Cost MEMS-Based Ultrasonic Airflow Sensors for Rooms and HVAC Systems
Project ObjectiveTo create cost-effective, precise, and space-efficient airflow sensors designed for the measurement of air velocities within rooms and volumetric air flows within HVAC systems. These sensors will leverage emerging microelectromechanical system (MEMS) technologies to achieve optimal performance.
Significance to IndustryThe absence of reliable monitoring of airspeed and airflow has notable repercussions on indoor comfort, ventilation efficacy, indoor air quality, occupant well-being, and safety. Additionally, it directly affects a significant portion of HVAC energy consumption, accounting for approximately 11% of California’s total energy utilization.
Research ApproachExperts from academia and industry are collaborating to create advanced ultrasonic airspeed sensors. These sensors will utilize novel MEMS technologies derived from 3D rangefinding, ensuring cost-effective production, long battery life, and wireless communication. The consortium will share design data, performance metrics, and control algorithms, validated through lab experiments and field trials.
Problem StatementPresent airspeed sensors are characterized by high costs, susceptibility to damage, and limited integration capabilities. Moreover, prevailing techniques employed for airflow measurement lack precision and accuracy.
Objective DefinitionCreate cost-effective, precise, and wireless microelectromechanical system (MEMS) airflow sensors tailored for room and HVAC system applications.
Technology DevelopmentUtilizing emerging MEMS technologies to develop groundbreaking ultrasonic airflow sensors renowned for their exceptional accuracy.
Hardware DesignArchitect sensor variants for both room-mounted and duct-mounted configurations, featuring autonomous orientation capabilities and minimal intrusion into airstreams.
Testing and ValidationConducting rigorous testing of the sensors in both controlled laboratory settings and real-world field environments to assess their accuracy, performance, and energy efficiency.
DocumentationDisseminating comprehensive design data, specifications, control sequences, and associated advantages through research findings and publications.
Disruptive InnovationInnovative ultrasonic MEMS sensors are reshaping the market landscape by offering a compelling combination of affordability and exceptional accuracy.
Energy EfficiencyEnhanced monitoring capabilities contribute to heightened airflow control, resulting in reduced energy consumption.
Comfort and HealthElevated indoor comfort, ventilation efficacy, air quality, and occupant well-being.
Industry AdoptionInitiating market momentum for sensor manufacturers through documented advantages.
Standards InfluenceDirect research outcomes towards energy and environmental standards committees such as ASHRAE and Title-24.
Pros of Conceptual FrameworkCons of Conceptual Framework
Comprehensive approach: The comprehensive approach of this conceptual framework considers various factors related to IAQ in a range of building types, such as offices, houses, and classrooms. This wider scope allows the framework to be utilized effectively in diverse settings.Limited consideration of specific building types: While the framework includes offices, houses, and classrooms, it may not cover all conceivable building types, potentially limiting its applicability in specific contexts.
Data analysis: Obtaining and analyzing datasets from both CLIMA and ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II adds a quantitative dimension to the research. This allows for the objective assessment and comparison of IAQ.Possible lack of comprehensive data: The presence of inadequate or incomplete data, depending on its availability and quality, poses a risk that the research analysis may lack accuracy and reliability.
Utilization of tools and databases: This research uses the CLIMA Tool and the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. The utilization of specialized tools and databases enhances the accuracy and reliability of the analysis. Possible bias towards certain methods: The research reliance on specific tools or databases, such as the CLIMA Tool or ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II, and using air conditioning systems as a method, may limit the consideration of alternative methodologies.
Potential for recommendations: Utilization of both tools and databases includes a dedicated step for offering recommendations and suggestions. This showcases the research’s practicality as it provides actionable insights for improving IAQ.Lack of consideration for external factors: This research primarily focuses on IAQ; it may not adequately address external factors that can impact IAQ, such as outdoor pollution sources or ventilation systems.
MonthMean (°C)Std (°C)Min (°C)1% (°C)25% (°C)50% (°C)75% (°C)99% (°C)Max (°C)
Jan11.354.6813811152122
Feb15.715.256.16.6711.8815.5519.8225.7326.6
Mar21.44510121721263132
Apr27.545.04171823.927323839
May32.485.2821222932364344
Jun33.035.3519222933374445
Jul31.343.352325293133.54041
Aug30.533.2423242830333838
Sep29.23.522022.62629323637
Oct25.425.071515.222225293636
Nov19.844.8310111619.9243031
Dec13.384.9923.721013172425
Year24.318.761517.926314145
Variable NameMeanMedianModeStd. DeviationMinimumMaximumPercentiles
25th50th75th
Indoor Dew point temperature (DEW) (°C)21.4821.9020.20 3.3602111.4032.4020.2021.9023.40
Indoor relative humidity (%)57.8359.9556.108.7561131.1075.0052.1559.9563.27
Operative air temperature (°C)30.5931.1031.501.7686025.4034.1029.5231.1031.80
Solar radiation (°C)33.6432.9032.902.3544529.1039.8032.1032.9034.80
Indoor Wet bulb temperature (WET) (°C)24.1224.6018.70 2.1868918.7031.0023.0024.6025.57
Indoor wet bulb ground temperature (°C)26.1226.6026.802.0395621.0030.7025.0226.6027.40
Outdoor heat stress index (°C)36.7036.0036.002.3376633.0043.0035.0036.0038.00
Outdoor relative humidity (%)59.1659.0057.00 11.7626419.6078.0054.0059.0067.00
Outdoor air temperature (°C)32.1132.0034.002.1701523.7036.0030.2532.0034.00
Outdoor DEW (°C)22.8223.0023.002.2153813.0026.0022.0023.0024.00
Indoor temperature ground (°C)31.2331.3531.803.4279124.7060.2029.8031.3532.20
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Haroon, M.U.; Ozarisoy, B.; Altan, H. Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869

Haroon MU, Ozarisoy B, Altan H. Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869

Haroon, Muhammad Usama, Bertug Ozarisoy, and Hasim Altan. 2024. "Factors Affecting the Indoor Air Quality and Occupants’ Thermal Comfort in Urban Agglomeration Regions in the Hot and Humid Climate of Pakistan" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177869

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Factors Affecting Employee Turnover: A Systematic Literature Review

Xheni Rusi at University of Tirana

  • University of Tirana
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Prisma flow map (data in the Scopus databases in July, 2023)

Discover the world's research

  • 25+ million members
  • 160+ million publication pages
  • 2.3+ billion citations

Ellen Bolt

  • PERS PSYCHOL

Troy A. Smith

  • Artemis Boulamatsi

Nikolaos Dimotakis

  • Abbas AlHamaqi

M. Y. Yusliza

  • Brittany Venegas
  • Elida Benitez
  • Rachel Matthews
  • Edward McGough

John P Meyer

  • Natalie Allen

Taslima Jannat

  • Recruit researchers
  • Join for free
  • Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Job Satisfaction: A Literature Review

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  2. (PDF) Evaluation of Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  3. (PDF) Factors affecting employees’ job satisfaction at Vinh Long radio

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  4. Factors Affecting Employees Job Satisfaction: A Literature Review

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  5. Literature Review JOB Satisfaction

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

  6. (PDF) Factors Affecting Employee Job Satisfaction

    factors affecting job satisfaction literature review

VIDEO

  1. Factors Affecting Job Design

  2. Job Satisfaction V/s Employee Satisfaction

  3. Factors affecting patient satisfaction at a plastic surgery outpatient department in South Africa

  4. JOB DESIGN : MEANING, APPROACHES,TECHNIQUES, IMPORTANCE, FACTORS AFFECTING #humanresourcemanagement

  5. JOB SATISFACTION HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

  6. 2.4- Factors Affecting Elasticity of demand

COMMENTS

  1. Systematic Literature Review of Job Satisfaction: an Overview and

    Job satisfaction discusses the extent to which employees are satisfied or dissatisfied with their jobs are caused by several factors that motivate them. This study aims to dig deeper into job ...

  2. PDF Job Satisfaction: A Literature Review

    Smith et al. (1969) defined job satisfaction as the feeling an individual has about his or her job. To him, job satisfaction could be measured in terms of pay, work itself, promotions, supervision, and coworkers. Locke (1976) defined job satisfaction as an emotional-affective response to a job or specific aspects of the job. Locke

  3. Job Satisfaction in the Workplace Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

    This systematic literature review provides an up-to-date overview of job satisfaction and employee relations. In analysing 24 published articles, it was found that the main factors influencing job ...

  4. Exploring Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A Comparison Between Survey

    The results showed that motivational factors influenced job satisfaction in the past, whereas hygiene factors influenced job satisfaction in the present. Prasad Kotni and Karumuri (2018) used the two-factor theory to analyze the job satisfaction of 150 current employees working in retail sales. The results showed that hygiene factors had a more ...

  5. The Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction

    A literature review conducted pre-COVID on work environment and job satisfaction revealed several factors that support a healthy work environment. Nurse leaders can use this information to inform decisions that will shape the future of health care today by creating work environments that support staff well-being and increase employee engagement ...

  6. Factors that influence nurses' job satisfaction: a literature review

    Work satisfaction is a major factor in nurse retention and the delivery of high quality care, but rapid changes in healthcare services have placed more demands on nurses and this has increased the need for organisations to consider ways to sustain and improve nurses' job satisfaction. To achieve this, they need to understand the factors that ...

  7. Job Satisfaction: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Analysis in a

    1. Introduction. Job satisfaction has been defined as a "pleasurable or positive emotional state, resulting from the appraisal of one's job experiences" [].Job satisfaction reflects on overall life quality involving social relationships, family connection and perceived health status, affecting job performances, work absenteeism and job turnover, leading, in some cases, to serious ...

  8. PDF JOB SATISFACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

    JOB SATISFACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE VOL. 3 ISSUE 4 (2011) PP: 77-86 81 Management Research and Practice Volume 3, Issue 4 / December 2011 ISSN 2067- 2462 mrp.ase.ro 2. FACTORS OF JOB SATISFACTION Job satisfaction is under the influence of a series of factors such as:The nature of work, Salary, Advancement

  9. (PDF) Job Satisfaction: A Literature Review

    JOB SATISFACTION, A LITERATURE REVIEW. Brikend AZIRI. Faculty of Business and Economics, South East European University, I lindenska 1200, Tetovo, Makedonia. [email protected]. Abstract. Job ...

  10. PDF CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

    2.9.2.1 The Value of Work. Islam emphasizes the importance of work, as according to the Islamic ethics "work is. considered to be a source of independence and a means of fostering personal growth, self-respect, satisfaction and self-fulfillment...Islamic work ethic argues that life without. an obligat.

  11. Job Satisfaction and Associated Factors among Health Professionals

    Introduction. Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from evaluating one's job or job experiences. However, knowledge of workplace factors that either satisfy employees to keep working or dissatisfy them making them leave their jobs or working places is essential for decision-making.

  12. PDF Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A Review of Empirical Literature

    This study sought to review literature on the factors that determine or influence job satisfaction. From the study it was found that job satisfaction is an ... did a research and found that the key factors affecting job satisfaction were career opportunities, job influence, team work and job challenge. According to Revenio Jr. (2016) leadership ...

  13. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review

    Background: Globally there are mounting concerns about nurses' job satisfaction because of its pivotal role in nurse turnover and the quality of care of patients. Objectives: To identify a more comprehensive and extensive knowledge of the job satisfaction of qualified general nurses working in acute care hospitals and its associated factors drawing upon empirical literature published in the ...

  14. PDF Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction: An Integrative

    Abstract. Herzberg published the two-factor theory of work motivation in 1959. The theory was. highly controversial at the time it was published, claims to be the most replicated study in this. area, and provided the foundation for numerous other theories and frameworks in human. resource development (Herzberg, 1987).

  15. Factors affecting allied health faculty job satisfaction: a literature

    Abstract. Evidence in the literature suggests job satisfaction can make a difference in keeping qualified workers on the job, but little research has been conducted focusing specifically on allied health faculty. In order to attract and retain top quality faculty, colleges and universities should understand the variables impacting faculty ...

  16. Factors Influencing Employee Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Analysis

    factors that might discourage the employees and lead to job dissatisfaction such as high stress, lack of organizational communication, lack of recognition, limited opportunity for personal and ...

  17. Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Hospitality Industry

    The study sought to examine and compare the importance of the seven factors (see the section "Literature Review") for overall job satisfaction. A correlation study was conducted in the natural environment of the organization, with minimum interference by the researcher in the normal flow of work (Sekaran, 2003). The setting was not ...

  18. Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A Review of Empirical Literature

    The purpose of this paper is to review literature on the factors that influence level of job satisfaction among the workforce and its effects on performance. ... (2020) did a study to investigate the factors affecting job satisfaction amongst workers of the poultry sub-sector: a test of equity theory in the Dormaa Municipality in the Bono ...

  19. JOB SATISFACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

    Asyraff Hussain. Job satisfaction represents one of the most complex areas facing today's managers when it comes to managing their employees. Many studies have demonstrated an unusually large impact on the job satisfaction on the motivation of workers, while the level of motivation has an impact on productivity, and hence also on performance of ...

  20. PDF Review of Literature on Factors Affecting the Employee Satisfaction

    job satisfaction. Finding out the factors affecting the job satisfaction is the key important role for any organization according to many researchers (Okpara, Squillance and rondu, 2005). In this paper we will be trying to find out the factors affecting the employee satisfaction by doing extensive literature review.

  21. PDF Factors Affecting Employee Performance: A Systematic Review

    Factors Affecting Employee Performance : A Systematic Review 151 employee satisfaction (Nadya dkk., 2022; Rahmah dkk., 2022), and build a positive reputation for the company. Employee performance is a measure of the extent to which an employee is able to fulfill his duties and responsibilities properly and effectively (Darvishmotevali & Ali, 2020).

  22. Employee Welfare Programs and Job Satisfaction: A Critical Literature

    The concept of employee turnover is widely researched though very little has been done to examine the key factors influencing it. Commercial banks are always looking for innovation on their products and services, and continuously attract the best employees in order to win more customers in this high competitive market with unrealistic targets and uncertain working environment.

  23. Factors Affecting Employees' Job Satisfaction: Organizational and

    Job. satisfaction is an employee's attitude toward his or her. job, which includes th e employee's feelings, perceptions, and evaluations of the job [3]. Improving employee job. satisfaction can ...

  24. Sustainability

    The World Air Quality Index indicates that Pakistan ranks as the third most polluted country, regarding the average (Particulate Matter) PM2.5 concentration, which is 14.2 times higher than the World Health Organization's annual air quality guideline. It is crucial to implement a program aimed at reducing PM2.5 levels in Pakistan's urban areas. This review paper highlights the importance ...

  25. (PDF) Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction

    2014). There are five main aspects that measure job satisfaction, these are pay, co-workers, promotions, supervision and the nature of the work. The individuals are able to measure job ...

  26. Factors Affecting Employee Turnover: A Systematic Literature Review

    The aim of this article is to conduct a systematic literature review in international journals on the various theoretical factors that influence employee turnover. The literature review shows that ...