To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, adoption of online streaming services: moderating role of personality traits.

International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management

ISSN : 0959-0552

Article publication date: 16 July 2021

Issue publication date: 27 April 2022

The purpose of this paper is to study the adoption of online streaming services from the technology acceptance perspective. A conceptual model incorporating personality traits with the technology acceptance model (TAM) is proposed and tested to predict user's intention to use online streaming services. Apart from the direct effects of personality traits on TAM variables, the study also examines the moderating effect of personality traits on TAM relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

To test the proposed model, a structured questionnaire was developed by adapting existing scales for the constructs to suit the online streaming services context. The data for the study were collected from online streaming services users in India. The model was tested using structural equation modeling using AMOS 18. Moderation analysis was performed using the PROCESS MACRO.

The findings suggest that perceived ease of use, subjective norms and technology anxiety affect intention to use online streaming services. Self-efficacy was found to affect perceived ease of use positively, and technology anxiety was found to have a negative effect on perceived usefulness. The results also evidenced the moderating role of self-efficacy and technology anxiety.

Originality/value

The paper explores the adoption of online streaming services from the technology acceptance perspective. Further, very few studies have examined the moderating role of personality traits in technology adoption. This paper attempts to fill this gap. It expands the understanding of technology adoption literature by assessing the direct as well as moderating effect of personality traits.

  • Technology acceptance model (TAM)
  • Personality traits
  • Technology anxiety
  • Self-efficacy
  • Moderating effect
  • Online streaming service retailer

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Bhatt, K. (2022), "Adoption of online streaming services: moderating role of personality traits", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management , Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 437-457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0310

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

music streaming Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

  • Latest Documents
  • Most Cited Documents
  • Contributed Authors
  • Related Sources
  • Related Keywords

Bestseller lists and product discovery in the subscription-based market: Evidence from music streaming

‘don’t mess with my algorithm’: exploring the relationship between listeners and automated curation and recommendation on music streaming services.

Given access to huge online collections of music on streaming platforms such as Spotify or Apple Music, users have become increasingly reliant on algorithmic recommender systems and automated curation and discovery features to find and curate music. Based on participant observation and semi-structured interviews with 15 active users of music streaming services, this article critically examines the user experience of music recommendation and streaming, seeking to understand how listeners interact with and experience these systems, and asking how recommendation and curation features define their use in a new and changing landscape of music consumption and discovery. This paper argues that through daily interactions with algorithmic features and curation, listeners build complex socio-technical relationships with these algorithmic systems, involving human-like factors such as trust, betrayal and intimacy. This article is significant as it positions music recommender systems as active agents in shaping music listening habits and the individual tastes of users.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENCIPTA TERHADAP DOWNLOAD MUSIC STREAMING DARI SEBUAH PLATFORM DIGITAL

Perkembangan teknologi yang pesat tersebut membawa perubahan di segala bidang kehidupan. Hal ini ditandai dengan terciptanya berbagai platform digital yang memudahkan setiap orang yang menampilkan karyanya. Karya-karya yang ditampillkan dalam berbagai platform digital merupakan suatu hasil kemampuan dan kreativitas manusia yang dapat menciptakan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (selanjutya disebut HKI).Untuk menghormati dan melindungi karya ciptaan tersebut, perlu diadakannya sebuah bentuk perlindungan melalui hak cipta. Penelitian hukum normatif terdiri dari penelitian terhadap asas-asas hukum dengan menekankan pada data sekunder dengan mempelajari dan mengkaji asas-asas atau prinsip-prinsip hukum, baik dalam kaidah hukum positif, kasus-kasus maupun ketentuan-ketentuan perundang-undangan nasional dan internasional yang berkaitan dengan pokok permasalahan yang diteliti. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalam memberikan suatu perlindungan terhadap suatu ciptaan khususnya untuk menghindari adanya penggandaan, pemberian izin dalam penggunaan karya cipta musik dan lagu oleh para pengguna (user) dilakukan dengan perjanjian lisensi disertai dengan adanya pembyaaran royalti kepada pencipta.

Examining the continuous usage intention and behaviours of music streaming subscribers

Music genre classification using deep learning with knn.

Music genre is a conventional category that predicts the genre of music belonging to tradition or set of conventions. A music platform, with total assets of $26 billion, is ruling the music streaming stage today. At present, it has a huge number of tunes and it is information base and claims to have the right music score for everybody. Like, Spotify, Amazon music, Wynk has put a great deal in examination to further develop the manner in which clients find and pay attention to music. AI is at the centre of their examination. From NLP to Collaborative sifting to Deep Learning, All music platforms utilizes them all. Tunes are examined dependent on their advanced marks for certain elements, including rhythm, acoustics, energy, danceability, and so forth, to answer that incomprehensible old first-date inquiry. Organizations these days use music arrangement, either to have the option to put suggestions to their clients (like Spotify, Soundcloud) or just as an item (for instance, Shazam). Deciding music sorts is the initial phase toward that path. AI procedures have ended up being very fruitful in removing patterns and examples from a huge information pool. Similar standards are applied in Music Analysis moreover. Machine learning techniques are achieved in some recent years and rarely in deep learning. Most of the current music genre classification uses Machine learning techniques. In this, we present a music dataset which includes many genres like Rock, Pop, folk, Classical and many genres. A Deep learning approach is used in order to train and classify the system using KNN.

Context-Aware Music Recommender Systems for Groups: A Comparative Study

Nowadays, recommender systems are present in multiple application domains, such as e-commerce, digital libraries, music streaming services, etc. In the music domain, these systems are especially useful, since users often like to listen to new songs and discover new bands. At the same time, group music consumption has proliferated in this domain, not just physically, as in the past, but virtually in rooms or messaging groups created for specific purposes, such as studying, training, or meeting friends. Single-user recommender systems are no longer valid in this situation, and group recommender systems are needed to recommend music to groups of users, taking into account their individual preferences and the context of the group (when listening to music). In this paper, a group recommender system in the music domain is proposed, and an extensive comparative study is conducted, involving different collaborative filtering algorithms and aggregation methods.

Frontiers: Virus Shook the Streaming Star: Estimating the COVID-19 Impact on Music Consumption

How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the consumption of audio music streaming?

Scaling Up Broken Systems? Considerations from the Area of Music Streaming

AbstractWe discuss the effects and characteristics of disruptive business models driven by technology, exemplified by the developments in music distribution and consumption over the last 20 years. Starting from a historical perspective, we offer insights into the current situation in music streaming, where technology has not only changed the way we access music but also has important implications on the broader ecosystem, which includes the consumers, the authors, the record industry, and the platforms themselves. The discussion points to potential benefits, as well as to the risks involved in the currently deployed systems. We conclude that the increased profitability of the disruptive business models in the music domain and beyond is largely generated at the expense of the providers of the goods or services being brokered. Using the platforms as a consumer further subsidizes their value and might lead to mono- and oligopolies. While technology allows companies to effectively scale up business, the resulting systems more often amplify existing injustices than mitigate them.

Factors Influencing Consumer Intention to Subscribe to the Premium Music Streaming Services in China

This study investigates the causes impacting the consumers' intention of the premium music streaming services' subscription in China. An integrated model called the Theory of Streaming Service Acceptance (TSSA) is proposed to explain and predict premium music streaming service subscription behaviors. The TSSA consists of four constructs: attitude, descriptive norm, injunctive norm and perceived behavioral control. The research data was collected in the form of an online survey in China with 120 respondents. Then, interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data from 20 participants. An explanatory sequential mixed method was implemented and the PLS-SEM technique was used to analyze the survey data. The results showed that all constructs in modified research mode, including attitude, injunctive norm and perceived behavioral control except descriptive norm, are indicative predictors for a person’s intention toward premium music streaming services’ subscription. Significant practical inspirations from the perspective of music streaming services providers are also summarized.

Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intention of the Premium Music Streaming Services’ Subscription in China

Export citation format, share document.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts

Latest science news, discoveries and analysis

research papers on online streaming

Could a rare mutation that causes dwarfism also slow ageing?

research papers on online streaming

Bird flu in US cows: is the milk supply safe?

research papers on online streaming

Future of Humanity Institute shuts: what's next for ‘deep future’ research?

research papers on online streaming

Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist’s lawsuit against university

Nih pay raise for postdocs and phd students could have us ripple effect, hello puffins, goodbye belugas: changing arctic fjord hints at our climate future, china's moon atlas is the most detailed ever made, ‘shut up and calculate’: how einstein lost the battle to explain quantum reality, ecologists: don’t lose touch with the joy of fieldwork chris mantegna.

research papers on online streaming

Should the Maldives be creating new land?

research papers on online streaming

Lethal AI weapons are here: how can we control them?

research papers on online streaming

Algorithm ranks peer reviewers by reputation — but critics warn of bias

research papers on online streaming

How gliding marsupials got their ‘wings’

Bird flu virus has been spreading in us cows for months, rna reveals, audio long read: why loneliness is bad for your health, nato is boosting ai and climate research as scientific diplomacy remains on ice, rat neurons repair mouse brains — and restore sense of smell.

research papers on online streaming

Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn’t — lessons from a superconductivity lab

research papers on online streaming

Any plan to make smoking obsolete is the right step

research papers on online streaming

Citizenship privilege harms science

European ruling linking climate change to human rights could be a game changer — here’s how charlotte e. blattner, will ai accelerate or delay the race to net-zero emissions, current issue.

Issue Cover

The Maldives is racing to create new land. Why are so many people concerned?

Surprise hybrid origins of a butterfly species, stripped-envelope supernova light curves argue for central engine activity, optical clocks at sea, research analysis.

research papers on online streaming

Ancient DNA traces family lines and political shifts in the Avar empire

research papers on online streaming

A chemical method for selective labelling of the key amino acid tryptophan

research papers on online streaming

Robust optical clocks promise stable timing in a portable package

research papers on online streaming

Targeting RNA opens therapeutic avenues for Timothy syndrome

Bioengineered ‘mini-colons’ shed light on cancer progression, galaxy found napping in the primordial universe, tumours form without genetic mutations, marsupial genomes reveal how a skin membrane for gliding evolved.

research papers on online streaming

Scientists urged to collect royalties from the ‘magic money tree’

research papers on online streaming

Breaking ice, and helicopter drops: winning photos of working scientists

research papers on online streaming

Shrouded in secrecy: how science is harmed by the bullying and harassment rumour mill

Want to make a difference try working at an environmental non-profit organization, how ground glass might save crops from drought on a caribbean island, books & culture.

research papers on online streaming

How volcanoes shaped our planet — and why we need to be ready for the next big eruption

research papers on online streaming

Dogwhistles, drilling and the roots of Western civilization: Books in brief

research papers on online streaming

Cosmic rentals

Las borinqueñas remembers the forgotten puerto rican women who tested the first pill, dad always mows on summer saturday mornings, nature podcast.

Nature Podcast

Latest videos

Nature briefing.

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

research papers on online streaming

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Main Navigation

  • Contact NeurIPS
  • Code of Ethics
  • Code of Conduct
  • Create Profile
  • Journal To Conference Track
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Proceedings
  • Future Meetings
  • Exhibitor Information
  • Privacy Policy

NeurIPS 2024

Conference Dates: (In person) 9 December - 15 December, 2024

Homepage: https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2024/

Call For Papers 

Author notification: Sep 25, 2024

Camera-ready, poster, and video submission: Oct 30, 2024 AOE

Submit at: https://openreview.net/group?id=NeurIPS.cc/2024/Conference  

The site will start accepting submissions on Apr 22, 2024 

Subscribe to these and other dates on the 2024 dates page .

The Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024) is an interdisciplinary conference that brings together researchers in machine learning, neuroscience, statistics, optimization, computer vision, natural language processing, life sciences, natural sciences, social sciences, and other adjacent fields. We invite submissions presenting new and original research on topics including but not limited to the following:

  • Applications (e.g., vision, language, speech and audio, Creative AI)
  • Deep learning (e.g., architectures, generative models, optimization for deep networks, foundation models, LLMs)
  • Evaluation (e.g., methodology, meta studies, replicability and validity, human-in-the-loop)
  • General machine learning (supervised, unsupervised, online, active, etc.)
  • Infrastructure (e.g., libraries, improved implementation and scalability, distributed solutions)
  • Machine learning for sciences (e.g. climate, health, life sciences, physics, social sciences)
  • Neuroscience and cognitive science (e.g., neural coding, brain-computer interfaces)
  • Optimization (e.g., convex and non-convex, stochastic, robust)
  • Probabilistic methods (e.g., variational inference, causal inference, Gaussian processes)
  • Reinforcement learning (e.g., decision and control, planning, hierarchical RL, robotics)
  • Social and economic aspects of machine learning (e.g., fairness, interpretability, human-AI interaction, privacy, safety, strategic behavior)
  • Theory (e.g., control theory, learning theory, algorithmic game theory)

Machine learning is a rapidly evolving field, and so we welcome interdisciplinary submissions that do not fit neatly into existing categories.

Authors are asked to confirm that their submissions accord with the NeurIPS code of conduct .

Formatting instructions:   All submissions must be in PDF format, and in a single PDF file include, in this order:

  • The submitted paper
  • Technical appendices that support the paper with additional proofs, derivations, or results 
  • The NeurIPS paper checklist  

Other supplementary materials such as data and code can be uploaded as a ZIP file

The main text of a submitted paper is limited to nine content pages , including all figures and tables. Additional pages containing references don’t count as content pages. If your submission is accepted, you will be allowed an additional content page for the camera-ready version.

The main text and references may be followed by technical appendices, for which there is no page limit.

The maximum file size for a full submission, which includes technical appendices, is 50MB.

Authors are encouraged to submit a separate ZIP file that contains further supplementary material like data or source code, when applicable.

You must format your submission using the NeurIPS 2024 LaTeX style file which includes a “preprint” option for non-anonymous preprints posted online. Submissions that violate the NeurIPS style (e.g., by decreasing margins or font sizes) or page limits may be rejected without further review. Papers may be rejected without consideration of their merits if they fail to meet the submission requiremhttps://www.overleaf.com/read/kcffhyrygkqc#85f742ents, as described in this document. 

Paper checklist: In order to improve the rigor and transparency of research submitted to and published at NeurIPS, authors are required to complete a paper checklist . The paper checklist is intended to help authors reflect on a wide variety of issues relating to responsible machine learning research, including reproducibility, transparency, research ethics, and societal impact. The checklist forms part of the paper submission, but does not count towards the page limit.

Supplementary material: While all technical appendices should be included as part of the main paper submission PDF, authors may submit up to 100MB of supplementary material, such as data, or source code in a ZIP format. Supplementary material should be material created by the authors that directly supports the submission content. Like submissions, supplementary material must be anonymized. Looking at supplementary material is at the discretion of the reviewers.

We encourage authors to upload their code and data as part of their supplementary material in order to help reviewers assess the quality of the work. Check the policy as well as code submission guidelines and templates for further details.

Use of Large Language Models (LLMs): We welcome authors to use any tool that is suitable for preparing high-quality papers and research. However, we ask authors to keep in mind two important criteria. First, we expect papers to fully describe their methodology, and any tool that is important to that methodology, including the use of LLMs, should be described also. For example, authors should mention tools (including LLMs) that were used for data processing or filtering, visualization, facilitating or running experiments, and proving theorems. It may also be advisable to describe the use of LLMs in implementing the method (if this corresponds to an important, original, or non-standard component of the approach). Second, authors are responsible for the entire content of the paper, including all text and figures, so while authors are welcome to use any tool they wish for writing the paper, they must ensure that all text is correct and original.

Double-blind reviewing:   All submissions must be anonymized and may not contain any identifying information that may violate the double-blind reviewing policy.  This policy applies to any supplementary or linked material as well, including code.  If you are including links to any external material, it is your responsibility to guarantee anonymous browsing.  Please do not include acknowledgements at submission time. If you need to cite one of your own papers, you should do so with adequate anonymization to preserve double-blind reviewing.  For instance, write “In the previous work of Smith et al. [1]…” rather than “In our previous work [1]...”). If you need to cite one of your own papers that is in submission to NeurIPS and not available as a non-anonymous preprint, then include a copy of the cited anonymized submission in the supplementary material and write “Anonymous et al. [1] concurrently show...”). Any papers found to be violating this policy will be rejected.

OpenReview: We are using OpenReview to manage submissions. The reviews and author responses will not be public initially (but may be made public later, see below). As in previous years, submissions under review will be visible only to their assigned program committee. We will not be soliciting comments from the general public during the reviewing process. Anyone who plans to submit a paper as an author or a co-author will need to create (or update) their OpenReview profile by the full paper submission deadline. Your OpenReview profile can be edited by logging in and clicking on your name in https://openreview.net/ . This takes you to a URL "https://openreview.net/profile?id=~[Firstname]_[Lastname][n]" where the last part is your profile name, e.g., ~Wei_Zhang1. The OpenReview profiles must be up to date, with all publications by the authors, and their current affiliations. The easiest way to import publications is through DBLP but it is not required, see FAQ . Submissions without updated OpenReview profiles will be desk rejected. The information entered in the profile is critical for ensuring that conflicts of interest and reviewer matching are handled properly. Because of the rapid growth of NeurIPS, we request that all authors help with reviewing papers, if asked to do so. We need everyone’s help in maintaining the high scientific quality of NeurIPS.  

Please be aware that OpenReview has a moderation policy for newly created profiles: New profiles created without an institutional email will go through a moderation process that can take up to two weeks. New profiles created with an institutional email will be activated automatically.

Venue home page: https://openreview.net/group?id=NeurIPS.cc/2024/Conference

If you have any questions, please refer to the FAQ: https://openreview.net/faq

Ethics review: Reviewers and ACs may flag submissions for ethics review . Flagged submissions will be sent to an ethics review committee for comments. Comments from ethics reviewers will be considered by the primary reviewers and AC as part of their deliberation. They will also be visible to authors, who will have an opportunity to respond.  Ethics reviewers do not have the authority to reject papers, but in extreme cases papers may be rejected by the program chairs on ethical grounds, regardless of scientific quality or contribution.  

Preprints: The existence of non-anonymous preprints (on arXiv or other online repositories, personal websites, social media) will not result in rejection. If you choose to use the NeurIPS style for the preprint version, you must use the “preprint” option rather than the “final” option. Reviewers will be instructed not to actively look for such preprints, but encountering them will not constitute a conflict of interest. Authors may submit anonymized work to NeurIPS that is already available as a preprint (e.g., on arXiv) without citing it. Note that public versions of the submission should not say "Under review at NeurIPS" or similar.

Dual submissions: Submissions that are substantially similar to papers that the authors have previously published or submitted in parallel to other peer-reviewed venues with proceedings or journals may not be submitted to NeurIPS. Papers previously presented at workshops are permitted, so long as they did not appear in a conference proceedings (e.g., CVPRW proceedings), a journal or a book.  NeurIPS coordinates with other conferences to identify dual submissions.  The NeurIPS policy on dual submissions applies for the entire duration of the reviewing process.  Slicing contributions too thinly is discouraged.  The reviewing process will treat any other submission by an overlapping set of authors as prior work. If publishing one would render the other too incremental, both may be rejected.

Anti-collusion: NeurIPS does not tolerate any collusion whereby authors secretly cooperate with reviewers, ACs or SACs to obtain favorable reviews. 

Author responses:   Authors will have one week to view and respond to initial reviews. Author responses may not contain any identifying information that may violate the double-blind reviewing policy. Authors may not submit revisions of their paper or supplemental material, but may post their responses as a discussion in OpenReview. This is to reduce the burden on authors to have to revise their paper in a rush during the short rebuttal period.

After the initial response period, authors will be able to respond to any further reviewer/AC questions and comments by posting on the submission’s forum page. The program chairs reserve the right to solicit additional reviews after the initial author response period.  These reviews will become visible to the authors as they are added to OpenReview, and authors will have a chance to respond to them.

After the notification deadline, accepted and opted-in rejected papers will be made public and open for non-anonymous public commenting. Their anonymous reviews, meta-reviews, author responses and reviewer responses will also be made public. Authors of rejected papers will have two weeks after the notification deadline to opt in to make their deanonymized rejected papers public in OpenReview.  These papers are not counted as NeurIPS publications and will be shown as rejected in OpenReview.

Publication of accepted submissions:   Reviews, meta-reviews, and any discussion with the authors will be made public for accepted papers (but reviewer, area chair, and senior area chair identities will remain anonymous). Camera-ready papers will be due in advance of the conference. All camera-ready papers must include a funding disclosure . We strongly encourage accompanying code and data to be submitted with accepted papers when appropriate, as per the code submission policy . Authors will be allowed to make minor changes for a short period of time after the conference.

Contemporaneous Work: For the purpose of the reviewing process, papers that appeared online within two months of a submission will generally be considered "contemporaneous" in the sense that the submission will not be rejected on the basis of the comparison to contemporaneous work. Authors are still expected to cite and discuss contemporaneous work and perform empirical comparisons to the degree feasible. Any paper that influenced the submission is considered prior work and must be cited and discussed as such. Submissions that are very similar to contemporaneous work will undergo additional scrutiny to prevent cases of plagiarism and missing credit to prior work.

Plagiarism is prohibited by the NeurIPS Code of Conduct .

Other Tracks: Similarly to earlier years, we will host multiple tracks, such as datasets, competitions, tutorials as well as workshops, in addition to the main track for which this call for papers is intended. See the conference homepage for updates and calls for participation in these tracks. 

Experiments: As in past years, the program chairs will be measuring the quality and effectiveness of the review process via randomized controlled experiments. All experiments are independently reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Financial Aid: Each paper may designate up to one (1) NeurIPS.cc account email address of a corresponding student author who confirms that they would need the support to attend the conference, and agrees to volunteer if they get selected. To be considered for Financial the student will also need to fill out the Financial Aid application when it becomes available.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

  • Publications
  • Our Methods
  • Short Reads
  • Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Partisan divides over K-12 education in 8 charts

Proponents and opponents of teaching critical race theory attend a school board meeting in Yorba Linda, California, in November 2021. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

K-12 education is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2024 election cycle. Several prominent Republican leaders, including GOP presidential candidates, have sought to limit discussion of gender identity and race in schools , while the Biden administration has called for expanded protections for transgender students . The coronavirus pandemic also brought out partisan divides on many issues related to K-12 schools .

Today, the public is sharply divided along partisan lines on topics ranging from what should be taught in schools to how much influence parents should have over the curriculum. Here are eight charts that highlight partisan differences over K-12 education, based on recent surveys by Pew Research Center and external data.

Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to provide a snapshot of partisan divides in K-12 education in the run-up to the 2024 election. The analysis is based on data from various Center surveys and analyses conducted from 2021 to 2023, as well as survey data from Education Next, a research journal about education policy. Links to the methodology and questions for each survey or analysis can be found in the text of this analysis.

Most Democrats say K-12 schools are having a positive effect on the country , but a majority of Republicans say schools are having a negative effect, according to a Pew Research Center survey from October 2022. About seven-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (72%) said K-12 public schools were having a positive effect on the way things were going in the United States. About six-in-ten Republicans and GOP leaners (61%) said K-12 schools were having a negative effect.

A bar chart that shows a majority of Republicans said K-12 schools were having a negative effect on the U.S. in 2022.

About six-in-ten Democrats (62%) have a favorable opinion of the U.S. Department of Education , while a similar share of Republicans (65%) see it negatively, according to a March 2023 survey by the Center. Democrats and Republicans were more divided over the Department of Education than most of the other 15 federal departments and agencies the Center asked about.

A bar chart that shows wide partisan differences in views of most federal agencies, including the Department of Education.

In May 2023, after the survey was conducted, Republican lawmakers scrutinized the Department of Education’s priorities during a House Committee on Education and the Workforce hearing. The lawmakers pressed U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on topics including transgender students’ participation in sports and how race-related concepts are taught in schools, while Democratic lawmakers focused on school shootings.

Partisan opinions of K-12 principals have become more divided. In a December 2021 Center survey, about three-quarters of Democrats (76%) expressed a great deal or fair amount of confidence in K-12 principals to act in the best interests of the public. A much smaller share of Republicans (52%) said the same. And nearly half of Republicans (47%) had not too much or no confidence at all in principals, compared with about a quarter of Democrats (24%).

A line chart showing that confidence in K-12 principals in 2021 was lower than before the pandemic — especially among Republicans.

This divide grew between April 2020 and December 2021. While confidence in K-12 principals declined significantly among people in both parties during that span, it fell by 27 percentage points among Republicans, compared with an 11-point decline among Democrats.

Democrats are much more likely than Republicans to say teachers’ unions are having a positive effect on schools. In a May 2022 survey by Education Next , 60% of Democrats said this, compared with 22% of Republicans. Meanwhile, 53% of Republicans and 17% of Democrats said that teachers’ unions were having a negative effect on schools. (In this survey, too, Democrats and Republicans include independents who lean toward each party.)

A line chart that show from 2013 to 2022, Republicans' and Democrats' views of teachers' unions grew further apart.

The 38-point difference between Democrats and Republicans on this question was the widest since Education Next first asked it in 2013. However, the gap has exceeded 30 points in four of the last five years for which data is available.

Republican and Democratic parents differ over how much influence they think governments, school boards and others should have on what K-12 schools teach. About half of Republican parents of K-12 students (52%) said in a fall 2022 Center survey that the federal government has too much influence on what their local public schools are teaching, compared with two-in-ten Democratic parents. Republican K-12 parents were also significantly more likely than their Democratic counterparts to say their state government (41% vs. 28%) and their local school board (30% vs. 17%) have too much influence.

A bar chart showing Republican and Democratic parents have different views of the influence government, school boards, parents and teachers have on what schools teach

On the other hand, more than four-in-ten Republican parents (44%) said parents themselves don’t have enough influence on what their local K-12 schools teach, compared with roughly a quarter of Democratic parents (23%). A larger share of Democratic parents – about a third (35%) – said teachers don’t have enough influence on what their local schools teach, compared with a quarter of Republican parents who held this view.

Republican and Democratic parents don’t agree on what their children should learn in school about certain topics. Take slavery, for example: While about nine-in-ten parents of K-12 students overall agreed in the fall 2022 survey that their children should learn about it in school, they differed by party over the specifics. About two-thirds of Republican K-12 parents said they would prefer that their children learn that slavery is part of American history but does not affect the position of Black people in American society today. On the other hand, 70% of Democratic parents said they would prefer for their children to learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today.

A bar chart showing that, in 2022, Republican and Democratic parents had different views of what their children should learn about certain topics in school.

Parents are also divided along partisan lines on the topics of gender identity, sex education and America’s position relative to other countries. Notably, 46% of Republican K-12 parents said their children should not learn about gender identity at all in school, compared with 28% of Democratic parents. Those shares were much larger than the shares of Republican and Democratic parents who said that their children should not learn about the other two topics in school.

Many Republican parents see a place for religion in public schools , whereas a majority of Democratic parents do not. About six-in-ten Republican parents of K-12 students (59%) said in the same survey that public school teachers should be allowed to lead students in Christian prayers, including 29% who said this should be the case even if prayers from other religions are not offered. In contrast, 63% of Democratic parents said that public school teachers should not be allowed to lead students in any type of prayers.

Bar charts that show nearly six-in-ten Republican parents, but fewer Democratic parents, said in 2022 that public school teachers should be allowed to lead students in prayer.

In June 2022, before the Center conducted the survey, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a football coach at a public high school who had prayed with players at midfield after games. More recently, Texas lawmakers introduced several bills in the 2023 legislative session that would expand the role of religion in K-12 public schools in the state. Those proposals included a bill that would require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every classroom, a bill that would allow schools to replace guidance counselors with chaplains, and a bill that would allow districts to mandate time during the school day for staff and students to pray and study religious materials.

Mentions of diversity, social-emotional learning and related topics in school mission statements are more common in Democratic areas than in Republican areas. K-12 mission statements from public schools in areas where the majority of residents voted Democratic in the 2020 general election are at least twice as likely as those in Republican-voting areas to include the words “diversity,” “equity” or “inclusion,” according to an April 2023 Pew Research Center analysis .

A dot plot showing that public school district mission statements in Democratic-voting areas mention some terms more than those in areas that voted Republican in 2020.

Also, about a third of mission statements in Democratic-voting areas (34%) use the word “social,” compared with a quarter of those in Republican-voting areas, and a similar gap exists for the word “emotional.” Like diversity, equity and inclusion, social-emotional learning is a contentious issue between Democrats and Republicans, even though most K-12 parents think it’s important for their children’s schools to teach these skills . Supporters argue that social-emotional learning helps address mental health needs and student well-being, but some critics consider it emotional manipulation and want it banned.

In contrast, there are broad similarities in school mission statements outside of these hot-button topics. Similar shares of mission statements in Democratic and Republican areas mention students’ future readiness, parent and community involvement, and providing a safe and healthy educational environment for students.

  • Education & Politics
  • Partisanship & Issues
  • Politics & Policy

Jenn Hatfield is a writer/editor at Pew Research Center

Most Americans think U.S. K-12 STEM education isn’t above average, but test results paint a mixed picture

About 1 in 4 u.s. teachers say their school went into a gun-related lockdown in the last school year, about half of americans say public k-12 education is going in the wrong direction, what public k-12 teachers want americans to know about teaching, what’s it like to be a teacher in america today, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

  • Age & Generations
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • Economy & Work
  • Family & Relationships
  • Gender & LGBTQ
  • Immigration & Migration
  • International Affairs
  • Internet & Technology
  • Methodological Research
  • News Habits & Media
  • Non-U.S. Governments
  • Other Topics
  • Race & Ethnicity
  • Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

  • Visit the University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Apply to the University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Give to the University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Search Form

Nebraska on-farm research network releases 2023 research results publication.

2023 Research Results book on top of soil

The Nebraska On-Farm Research Network (NOFRN) is placing research results into producers’ hands through its 2023 Research Results book — a publication that highlights findings from approximately 80 on-farm research studies conducted in Nebraska during the 2023 growing season.

"The research results in this book equip producers with the tools to harness local insights, enabling them to make well-informed decisions that optimize both productivity and profitability on their own operation" said Taylor Lexow, NOFRN Project Coordinator.

Studies in the 2023 Research Results book cover various topics, including crop production, fertility and soil management, non-traditional products, cover crops, crop protection and equipment. The 2023 publication, along with publications from previous years, is now available on the NOFRN’s website.

With planting season upon us, now is the time to dig deeper into agricultural practices and determine what best fits the needs of every operation. Download a copy of the 2023 Research Results book today from the NOFRN site .

For more information about the 2023 Research Results book or the NOFRN, please contact Taylor Lexow at 402-245-2222 .

About the NOFRN

The Nebraska On-Farm Research Network (NOFRN) is a program of Nebraska Extension that partners with farmers to evaluate agricultural practices and provide innovative solutions that impact farm productivity, profitability and sustainability. It is supported by the Nebraska Corn Board, the Nebraska Corn Growers Association, the Nebraska Soybean Checkoff and the Nebraska Dry Bean Commission. To learn more about the NOFRN, visit its website .

2023 Research Results Book

Online Master of Science in Agronomy

With a focus on industry applications and research, the online program is designed with maximum flexibility for today's working professionals.

A field of corn.

We've detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Why did this happen?

Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .

For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) PhD Dissertation: The Discourse of Online Live Streaming on

    research papers on online streaming

  2. (PDF) The Utilization of Live Streaming Technology to Improve the

    research papers on online streaming

  3. (PDF) A Content Analysis of Social Live Streaming Services

    research papers on online streaming

  4. Live Webinar

    research papers on online streaming

  5. (PDF) Emergence and future of Over-the-top (OTT) video services in

    research papers on online streaming

  6. IJERPH

    research papers on online streaming

VIDEO

  1. How to Create an Interactive Research Article using Streamlit

  2. Researching Online for College Students: Five Easy Steps

  3. Research Tips: Finding Academic Research Online

  4. Online research using the university library resources

  5. 10 websites which provide free articles and research paper for your thesis!!

  6. Research Paper Presentation, Sixth National IR Conference 2014

COMMENTS

  1. The streaming industry and the platform economy: An analysis

    Abstract. As television is embracing a new set of internet-related technologies, the medium is transitioning from broadcasting to streaming. With it, a new mode of distribution has emerged: the streaming platform. This research makes a three-pronged effort to assess their impact on the TV industry: it analyses the way platforms monetize content ...

  2. A survey on cloud-based video streaming services

    4.6. Cloud storage for video streaming. The rapid growth of video streaming usage in various applications, such as e-learning, video surveillance and situational awareness, and on various forms of mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets, laptops) has created the problem of big video data [ 132 ].

  3. Factors Affecting Online Streaming Subscriptions

    online streaming or cable. Our research intent is to establish whether there are any significant relationships between these factors—that is, whether the choice between online streaming or cable services leads to more sales or the purchase of additional add-ons. Reviewing the research performed by Cha and Chan-Olmsted (2012), there was

  4. On Streaming-Media Platforms, Their Audiences, and Public Life

    Audiences, and Public Life. Aras Özgün and Andreas Treske. Over the past decade, streaming-media platforms have emerged as new and natively. digital forms of content delivery. For the audience ...

  5. The streaming network: Conceptualizing distribution economy, technology

    Here, we departed from what I conceive to be the central relationships between the streaming provider, the database, the user and the device and software (the core streaming model). Future research will indicate to what extent the network components presented here - including flows of data and payments and relationships of access, control and ...

  6. The Future of TV and Online Video Platforms: A Study on Predictors of

    Original Research Introduction Online video streaming sites and television websites have attracted large audiences and have been able to maintain viewership within different markets. In 2021, the number of global subscribers to online video streaming service reached 1,060.8 million, with Netflix as the largest player command-

  7. OTT and live streaming services: Past, present, and future

    The fifth paper is an integrative literature review of research on advertising in streaming video while the sixth paper is a case study explicating the changes caused by Netflix in local Thai content industries and regulations. ... groups: those focusing on online streaming television advertising, in-stream ads, overlay ads, general or more ...

  8. The impact of network social presence on live streaming ...

    Therefore, our research complements existing research on the viewer's social support willingness in the online live streaming environment. Secondly, this study provides a new path for the study ...

  9. (PDF) Factors Affecting Online Streaming Subscriptions

    additional purchase, social trend ( negative), cost and customer se rvice factors. were statistically significant. In contrast to the cable TV, only social trend and. available options were ...

  10. An analysis of user behavior in online video streaming

    consists of the following steps: 1) Mining the database and. retrieving the streaming se ssions that contain information. of active user behavior; 2) Defining behavior patterns and. mapping user ...

  11. Psychosocial Impact of Web Series and Streaming Content: A Study on

    Nowadays, Web series and online streaming content are becoming the heart of the youth. Web series are replacing television and have seen a boom in online streaming and web series content produced in India. Many big companies like Amazon, Netflix, SonyLiv, Hot star, and Eros Now have invested heavily in regional content.

  12. The commercial impact of live streaming: A ...

    The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a leading international consumer research journal. Abstract Live streaming allows streamers and viewers to watch, create, and share videos in real time on topics from gaming, shopping, and social channels to tourism and entertainment. ... Search for more papers by this author. Sommer Kapitan ...

  13. Adoption of online streaming services: moderating role of personality

    Originality/value. The paper explores the adoption of online streaming services from the technology acceptance perspective. Further, very few studies have examined the moderating role of personality traits in technology adoption. This paper attempts to fill this gap. It expands the understanding of technology adoption literature by assessing ...

  14. Music streaming services: understanding the drivers of customer

    In fact, recommending a technology to others is a behaviour that has been significantly neglected by researchers (Luo et al., 2016), and to the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that this post-adoption behaviour has been studied in the context of music streaming. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows.

  15. Full article: A Data Mining Approach for Developing Online Streaming

    Introduction. With the increasing popularity of broadband networks and the improvement of computing power, live-streaming media that was originally only suitable for electronic media and enterprises can be extended to users and families on the Internet (Singh and Sharma Citation 2020).The line stream uses and continues the advantages of the Internet, and uses video for online live streaming.

  16. Live Streaming Commerce: A Review and Research Agenda

    Live streaming on social media has evolved into live streaming commerce (LSC), a subset of electronic commerce that merges real-time social interaction with digital marketing. LSC is increasingly used for enhancing customer engagement, product promotion, transaction facilitation, and improving online shopping experiences.

  17. PDF Enforcing Copyright on Online Streaming Platforms: Challenges Faced by

    The advent of online streaming platforms has revolutionized the way content is consumed, providing users with instant access to a vast array of digital media. However, this digital era has also brought forth numerous challenges for copyright holders in enforcing their rights. This research paper aims to

  18. music streaming Latest Research Papers

    The Relationship . Music Streaming. Given access to huge online collections of music on streaming platforms such as Spotify or Apple Music, users have become increasingly reliant on algorithmic recommender systems and automated curation and discovery features to find and curate music. Based on participant observation and semi-structured ...

  19. A Survey on Cloud-Based Video Streaming Services

    As video streaming industry is increasingly becom-. ing reliant on cloud computing, the second goal of this survey is to explore and surve y. the ways cloud services are utilized to enable video ...

  20. Latest science news, discoveries and analysis

    Find breaking science news and analysis from the world's leading research journal.

  21. Use of ChatGPT for schoolwork among US teens

    Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to understand American teens' use and understanding of ChatGPT in the school setting. The Center conducted an online survey of 1,453 U.S. teens from Sept. 26 to Oct. 23, 2023, via Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents, who were part of its KnowledgePanel. The KnowledgePanel is a ...

  22. NeurIPS 2024 Call for Papers

    Call For Papers Abstract submission deadline: May 15, 2024 01:00 PM PDT or Full paper submission deadline, including technical appendices and supplemental material (all authors must have an OpenReview profile when submitting): May 22, 2024 01:00 PM PDT or Author notification: Sep 25, 2024

  23. How Democrats, Republicans differ over K-12 education

    Here are eight charts that highlight partisan differences over K-12 education, based on recent surveys by Pew Research Center and external data. How we did this. Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to provide a snapshot of partisan divides in K-12 education in the run-up to the 2024 election. The analysis is based on data from various ...

  24. Netflix audience data, streaming industry discourse, and the emerging

    To understand the industrial discourses related to proprietary streaming audience data, this research examines a variety of publicly available secondary data from sources including trade press articles, press releases, trade and popular press interviews, videos of industry roundtables, promotional appearances, and more than 10 years of Netflix ...

  25. IUBMB Life Call for Papers Special Issue on Environmental Management

    Call for Papers Special Issue on Environmental Management and Biomedical Research. Submission deadline: Tuesday, 10 September 2024. Objective of the issue Background: The Special Issue serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the intersection of Environmental Management and Biomedical Research.

  26. (PDF) A Contemporary Survey on Live Video Streaming from ...

    optimized for service quality improvements. This paper provides a contemporary survey of cutting-edge live video streaming. studies from a computation-driven perspective. First, an overview of the ...

  27. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Journal of Advances in

    This Special Collection aims to curate a diverse array of research papers that reflect the conference's multifaceted discussions. It will feature innovative modeling studies that delve into crucial aspects such as soil biogeochemical processes, land surface interactions, the role of soil in mitigating and adapting to climate change, and the ...

  28. Nebraska On-Farm Research Network Releases 2023 Research Results

    With planting season upon us, now is the time to dig deeper into agricultural practices and determine what best fits the needs of every operation. Download a copy of the 2023 Research Results book today from the NOFRN site. For more information about the 2023 Research Results book or the NOFRN, please contact Taylor Lexow at 402-245-2222.

  29. Stock Market Today: Dow, S&P Live Updates for April 23

    Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world