• Biology Article

Bacterial Genetics

Table of Contents

Mechanism of Bacterial Conjugation

Generalized transduction, specialized transduction, bacterial competence, how to identify transformed cells.

There are numerous bacteria found on planet earth. They divide quickly by binary fission producing identical daughter cells. Thus, the genetic information is transferred from the mother to the offspring and is known as vertical transmission.

The mutations are transferred from one bacteria to another through horizontal transmission. There are three different types of horizontal transmission for the transfer of genetic information.

  • Conjugation
  • Transduction
  • Transformation

Bacterial Conjugation

Conjugation is the method of transfer of genetic material from one bacteria to another placed in contact. This method was proposed by Lederberg and Tatum. They discovered that the F-factor can move between E.coli cells and proposed the concept of conjugation.

Bacterial Conjugation

There are various conjugal plasmids carried by various bacterial species. Conjugation is carried out in several steps:

  • Mating pair formation
  • Conjugal DNA synthesis
  • DNA transfer

Also Read:  R-Factor

Bacterial conjugation involves the following steps:

Pilus Formation

The donor cells (F+ cells) form a sex pilus and begin contact with an F- recipient cell.

Physical Contact between Donor and Recipient Cell

The pilus forms a conjugation tube and enables direct contact between the donor and the recipient cells.

Transfer of F-Plasmid

The F-factor opens at the origin of replication. One strand is cut at the origin of replication, and the 5’ end enters the recipient cell.

Synthesis of Complementary Strand

The donor and the recipient strand both contain a single strand of the F-plasmid. Thus, a complementary strand is synthesized in both the recipient and the donor. The recipient cell now contains a copy of F plasmid and becomes a donor cell.

Also Read:  Difference between Virus and Bacteria

Bacterial Transduction

Transduction is the process of transfer of genes from the recipient to the donor through bacteriophage.

Bacterial Transduction

Transduction is of two types:

In this type, the bacteriophage first infects the donor cells and begins the lytic cycle. The virus then develops its components using the host cell machinery. The host cell DNA is hydrolyzed into small fragments by the viral enzymes.

Small pieces of bacteria DNA is now integrated into viral genome. When the virus infects another bacteria the DNA is transferred into it.

In this, only a few restricted bacteria are transferred from donor to recipient bacteria. This is carried out by temperate bacteriophage which undergoes the lysogenic cycle.

The virus enters the bacteria and integrates its genome within the host cell DNA. It remains dormant and passes on from generation to generation. When the lysogenic cell is exposed to some external stimulus, the lytic cycle begins.

The viral genome is induced in the host cell genome. Due to this, the phage genome sometimes carries the bacterial genome with it and integrates it into the genome of the recipient cell. Here, only the restricted genome has the possibility of entering the recipient cells.

Bacterial Transformation

Transformation is the process of DNA uptake by the bacteria from the surrounding environment. The cells that have the ability to uptake DNA are known as competent cells . This process was first reported in Streptococcus pneumonia by Griffith.

Bacterial Transformation

Not all bacteria are capable of taking up DNA from the surrounding environment. Such bacteria are made artificially competent. This is achieved by using chemicals and electrical pulses.

  • Chemicals- The cells are chilled and made permeable in the presence of calcium phosphate. They are then incubated with the DNA and provided with a heat shock treatment that causes the DNA to enter the cells.
  • Electroporation- The bacterial cells are subjected to electrical pulses to make them permeable and cause the DNA to enter into cells.

The bacteria are grown on an agar medium with antibiotics to check for transformed cells. Only the bacteria containing the antibiotic resistance gene will grow in the presence of antibiotics. The cells that survive and grow are transformed cells. The others are non-transformed.

Also Read: E.coli

For more information on bacterial genetics, bacterial conjugation, bacterial transduction, and bacterial transformation, keep visiting BYJU’S website or download BYJU’S app for further reference.

Frequently Asked Questions on

What are the three methods of genetic transfer in bacteria.

The three methods of genetic transfer in bacteria are conjugation, transduction and transformation.

What is bacterial genetic material?

The genetic material of bacteria is deoxy ribo nucleic acid or DNA. It is present as a single copy in circular form in the nucleoid region of bacteria.

What is plasmid DNA?

The extra chromosomal circular DNA present in bacteria is called plasmid. It codes for some genes like antibiotic resistance genes. During conjugation, a copy of plasmid is transferred to other bacteria. E.g: F-factor.

What is conjugation?

Conjugation is the transfer of genetic material from one bacteria to another through a conjugation tube.

What is the importance of bacterial transformation?

Transformation is the process of uptake of genetic material by bacteria from its surroundings. It is utilized in genetic engineering to introduce a foreign gene into the bacterium.

Quiz Image

Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!

Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz

Visit BYJU’S for all Biology related queries and study materials

Your result is as below

Request OTP on Voice Call

BIOLOGY Related Links

uk essay gene transformation

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.

X

UCL Translational Research Office Blog

Menu

Gene Therapy explained: Changing our bodies’ recipe to treat disease

By Alina Shrourou, on 19 January 2021

Written by Linda von Nerée, NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at UCL.

How many pairs of jeans do you have in your wardrobe? How many genes are in your body? What are genes anyway and do you know how they can help to treat an illness?!

All is explained in this brand-new animation from us at the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at University College London (UCL BTRU). Well, except how many jeans you own, that stays your secret.

Animated children asking questions about gene therapy

Young people asking questions about gene therapy in the animation ‘Gene Therapy explained: Changing our bodies’ recipe to treat disease’. Screenshot from an animation provided by KindeaLabs.

Gene therapy helps to treat some inherited diseases passed on from parent to child that don’t have a treatment or cure yet. Many different gene therapies are currently in development all over the world for many inherited diseases such as those that affect the ability of our blood’s immune system to fight off infections that make us ill.

The animation shows, Alexis and Freddie, two members of the Young Persons’ Advisory Group (YPAG) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children asking questions to understand what gene therapy is about. All members of the group were involved in shaping the animation and they regularly work with doctors, nurses and scientists helping to improve health care research for children. When possible, the group meets near the Zayed Centre for Research into Rare Disease in Children, where scientists look for new and better ways to treat uncommon diseases in children.

Why this Gene Therapy animation?

‘I spent most of my career as a researcher developing gene therapies for children who have an immune system that doesn’t function properly. The immune system of these children can’t protect them from infections and become life-threatening. A lot is said on the news about gene editing, less how it can help to treat inherited diseases.

Alexis and Freddie helped us to brilliantly explain just this in our animation. We hope it finds much interest and explains a ground-breaking future treatment for some inherited conditions.’ – Adrian Thrasher, Professor in Paediatric Immunology and Research Lead at the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at University College London (UCL)

What was it like to work on the Gene Therapy animation?

It is a new and innovative way to treat some inherited diseases, which surprised me because I thought there were a few other remedies and cures already out there. I really like the animation, and I’m so glad it has turned out this well, (especially the hair), I am so grateful to have had an opportunity to be a part of this! – Alexis, member of the Young Persons’ Advisory Group (YPAG) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children  I enjoyed being part of the animation because I have never done anything like that before. Because of the lockdown I went in my bedroom and recorded my voice on a phone which was strange, but I think the finished animation is good.’ – Freddie, YPAG member at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children ‘It was a huge pleasure to work with Alexis, Freddie and YPAG as a group of inspiring young people involved in improving health through research. Their ideas and invaluable input made the animation so much better and very different from the first draft we presented back to them at a meeting in summer 2018.’ – Linda von Nerée, Patient and Public Involvement Lead at NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at UCL ‘It is such a privilege to work in the gene therapy field and see research in action. I had a great time attending the YPAG group and hearing from its members. Alexis and Freddie have done a great job!’ Katie Snell, Lead Gene Therapy Research Nurse at UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health

Young Persons’ Advisory Group (YPAG) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

The Young Persons’ Advisory Group (YPAG) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children – young people making health care research for children better

Did you know?

Researchers estimate that we have between 20,000 and 25,000 genes in our body. We have two copies of each gene, one from each parent.

Learn more in the full animation:

‘Gene Therapy explained: Changing our bodies’ recipe to treat disease’

Let us know what you think and if you like it. Please share widely with your friends and family!

About the authors

  • Alexis – I joined YPAG when I was 8 years old and I have been a member for 5 years! Including the voices of young people is important because we are the next up and coming generation, and in a few years we will be the ones filling these roles so I think it’s important we have a say in how our future is going to be like.
  • Freddie – I am 12 years old and I joined YPAG when I was 9. I really enjoy YPAG because I learn something new every time and get to be involved in interesting things like this animation.
  • Linda – In my role, I bring together patients, members of the public, researchers, doctors and nurses to learn from each other and design research in the best possible way for those to benefit from it. Working with YPAG is a huge pleasure!

About the Young Persons’ Advisory Group (YPAG)

YPAG logo

We are a group of young people working with doctors, nurses and researchers to add our views and opinions to the development of new treatments for children. We are part of GenerationR , a network of young people improving health through research.

More at: https://www.gosh.nhs.uk/research-and-innovation/nihr-gosh-brc/patient-and-public-involvement

About the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at University College London

The NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Stem Cell and Immunotherapies at University College London (UCL) is an academic partnership with NHS Blood and Transplant funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It focusses on improving stem cell transplants (transfer of stem cells, which lead to new blood cells in the recipient) and the use of novel therapies, including CAR-T and gene therapy, both to treat inherited genetic disorders and to repair or strengthen the immune system’s ability to fight infection or disease. For more information, please visit https://www.ucl.ac.uk/cancer/research/centres-and-networks/nihr-blood-and-transplant-research-unit-stem-cells-and-immunotherapies or follow @BTRUinStemCells on twitter.

NIHR BTRU logo

Filed under Articles , Gene Therapy

Tags: gene therapy , NIHR BTRU , Patient and Public Involvement

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

The TRO builds on an increasingly vibrant translational culture across UCL by providing integrated support for translational research, industrial partnerships and drug discovery.

The articles in this blog will focus on the main barriers to translational research and how to overcome these.

Please  contact us with any questions relating to your research project, or feel free to reach out if you’d like us to discuss a particular challenge and share a solution from our experienced team.

Subscribe by Email

Completely spam free, opt out any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

Your Email Leave this field blank

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Published: 13 January 2022

The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic transformation

  • Ke Wang   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-4935 1 ,
  • Lei Shi 1   na1 ,
  • Xiaona Liang 1   na1 ,
  • Pei Zhao 1 ,
  • Wanxin Wang 1 ,
  • Junxian Liu 2 ,
  • Yanan Chang 2 ,
  • Yukoh Hiei 3 ,
  • Chizu Yanagihara 3 ,
  • Lipu Du 1 ,
  • Yuji Ishida   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-6978 3 &
  • Xingguo Ye   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-2753 1  

Nature Plants volume  8 ,  pages 110–117 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

16k Accesses

114 Citations

24 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Genetic engineering
  • Molecular engineering in plants

An Author Correction to this article was published on 30 May 2022

This article has been updated

Although great progress has been achieved regarding wheat genetic transformation technology in the past decade 1 , 2 , 3 , genotype dependency, the most impactful factor in wheat genetic transformation, currently limits the capacity for wheat improvement by transgenic integration and genome-editing approaches. The application of regeneration-related genes during in vitro culture could potentially contribute to enhancement of plant transformation efficiency 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 . In the present study, we found that overexpression of the wheat gene TaWOX5 from the WUSCHEL family dramatically increases transformation efficiency with less genotype dependency than other methods. The expression of TaWOX5 in wheat calli prohibited neither shoot differentiation nor root development. Moreover, successfully transformed transgenic wheat plants can clearly be recognized based on a visible botanic phenotype, relatively wider flag leaves. Application of TaWOX5 improved wheat immature embryo transformation and regeneration. The use of TaWOX5 in improvement of transformation efficiency also showed promising results in Triticum monococcum , triticale, rye, barley and maize.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

111,21 € per year

only 9,27 € per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

uk essay gene transformation

Similar content being viewed by others

uk essay gene transformation

Leaf transformation for efficient random integration and targeted genome modification in maize and sorghum

uk essay gene transformation

A GRF–GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants

uk essay gene transformation

Recent advances in crop transformation technologies

Data availability.

Accession numbers and gene names are available from the phylogenetic tree in Extended Data Fig. 1 . The accession numbers of genes identified in this study are available in Supplementary Table 1 , and their sequences are provided in the Supplementary sequence file. The accession number of pWMB111 is MZ458107. Raw data for experiments are available in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 . Transgenic lines and plasmids generated are available from the corresponding authors on request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

30 may 2022.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01173-3

Ishida, Y. Tsunashima, M. Hiei, Y. & Komari, T. in Agrobacterium Protocols Vol. 1 (ed. Wang, K.) 189–198 (Springer, 2015).

Richardson, T., Thistleton, J., Higgins, T. J., Howitt, C. & Ayliffe, M. Efficient Agrobacterium transformation of elite wheat germplasm without selection. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 119 , 647–659 (2014).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wang, K., Liu, H. Y., Du, L. P. & Ye, X. G. Generation of marker-free transgenic hexaploid wheat via an Agrobacterium -mediated co-transformation strategy in commercial Chinese wheat varieties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15 , 614–623 (2017).

Zakizadeh, H., Stummann, B. M., Lutken, H. & Muller, R. Isolation and characterization of four somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase (RhSERK) genes from miniature potted rose ( Rosa hybrida cv. Linda). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 101 , 331–338 (2010).

Lotan, T. et al. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93 , 1195–1205 (1998).

Stone, S. L. et al. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 , 11806–11811 (2001).

Nishimura, A. et al. Isolation of a rice regeneration quantitative trait loci gene and its application to transformation systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 11940–11944 (2005).

Boutilier, K. et al. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 14 , 1737–1749 (2002).

Bouchabke-Coussa, O. et al. Wuschel overexpression promotes somatic embryogenesis and induces organogenesis in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) tissues cultured in vitro . Plant Cell Rep. 32 , 675–686 (2013).

Zuo, J. R., Niu, Q. W., Frugis, G. & Chua, N. H. The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis . Plant J. 30 , 349–359 (2002).

Lowe, K. et al. Morphogenic regulators baby boom and wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28 , 1998–2015 (2016).

Lowe, K. et al. Rapid genotype ‘independent’ Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 54 , 240–252 (2018).

Gao, H. R. et al. Superior field performance of waxy corn engineered using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 38 , 579–581 (2020).

Hoerster, G. et al. Use of non-integrating Zm-Wus2 vectors to enhance maize transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 56 , 265–279 (2020).

Debernardi, J. M. et al. A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 38 , 1274–1279 (2020).

Su, Y. H. et al. Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis . Plant J. 59 , 448–460 (2009).

van der Graaff, E., Laux, T. & Rensing, S. A. The WUS homeobox-containing (WOX) protein family. Genome Biol. 10 , 248 (2009).

Article   Google Scholar  

Sarkar, A. K. et al. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers. Nature 446 , 811–814 (2007).

Zhang, W. et al. Regeneration capacity evaluation of some largely popularized wheat varieties in China. Acta Agron. Sin. 44 , 208–217 (2018).

Riaz, B. et al. Overexpression of maize ZmC1 and ZmR transcription factors in wheat regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in a tissue-specific manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 , 5806 (2019).

Wang, X. M. et al. Effects of environmental temperature on the regeneration frequency of the immature embryos of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L .). J. Integr. Agric. 13 , 722–732 (2014).

Tao, L. L. et al. Improvement of plant regeneration from immature embryos of wheat infected by Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Agric. Sci. China 10 , 317–326 (2011).

Liu, H. Y. et al. Efficient induction of haploid plants in wheat by editing of TaMTL using an optimized Agrobacterium -mediated CRISPR system. J. Exp. Bot. 71 , 1337–1349 (2021).

Bartlett, J. G., Alves, S. C., Smedley, M., Snape, J. W. & Harwood, W. A. High-throughput Agrobacterium -mediated barley transformation. Plant Methods 4 , 22 (2008).

Ishida, Y., Hiei, Y. & Komari, T. Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of maize. Nat. Protoc. 2 , 1614–1621 (2007).

Sambrook, J. Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual 3rd ed. Chapter 1, 34–36 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001).

Paternò, A. et al. In-house validation and comparison of two wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) taxon-specific real-time PCR methods for GMO quantification supported by droplet digital PCR. Food Anal. Methods 11 , 1281–1290 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Xiao at Saint Louis University, USA and H. Li at the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for critical revisions of this manuscript. This research was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31971946) to K.W., the Science and Technology Department of Ningxia in China (no. 2019BBF02020) to X.Y. and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (nos. S2021ZD03 and 2060302-2-19) to K.W. and X.Y..

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Lei Shi, Xiaona Liang.

Authors and Affiliations

Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China

Ke Wang, Lei Shi, Xiaona Liang, Pei Zhao, Wanxin Wang, Lipu Du & Xingguo Ye

College of Life Science, Capital Normal University, Beijing, P. R. China

Junxian Liu & Yanan Chang

Plant Innovation Center, Japan Tobacco Inc., Iwata, Japan

Yukoh Hiei, Chizu Yanagihara & Yuji Ishida

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

K.W. contributed to funding acquisition, experimental design, vector construction, wheat and barley transformation, data analysis and manuscript writing. L.S. contributed to gene identification, vector construction and transgenic detection. X.L. performed medium modification and wheat transformation. P.Z. was involved in gene identification and sequence analysis. W.W. was involved in barley transformation and manuscript writing. J.L. performed transformation of T. monococcum and rye. Y.C. performed transformation of triticale. Y.H. performed transformation of maize. C.Y. contributed to vector construction. L.D. contributed material management and medium preparation. Y.I. contributed to experimental design, wheat transformation and manuscript editing. X.Y. conceived the study, supervised experiments, conducted formal analysis and contributed to project administration, funding acquisition and manuscript editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ke Wang , Yuji Ishida or Xingguo Ye .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

K.W., X.Y. and L.D. (all ICS-CAAS) are co-inventors in Chinese patent application no. ZL201710422896.6. X.Y., K.W., L.S. and L.D. (all ICS-CAAS) and Y.I. and C.Y. (both JT) are co-inventors in international patent application no. PCT/CN2018/090239, in which ICS-CAAS and JT had shared ownership; the share of the latter was assigned to Kaneka Corporation, a Japanese chemical company, on 29 January 2021. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Plants thanks Sadiye Hayta and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended data fig. 1 phylogenetic relationships among tawox5 and tawus proteins from wheat, and wox proteins from arabidopsis ..

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the sequences of TaWOX5 and TaWUS proteins in wheat and WOX proteins in Arabidopsis in MEGA X using the neighbor-joining approach with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Scale plate and legend in left display tree scale and bootstrap value. AtWUS: NP_565429; AtWOX1: NP_188428; AtWOX2: NP_200742; AtWOX3: NP_180429; AtWOX4: NP_175145; AtWOX5: NP_187735; AtWOX6: NP_565263; AtWOX7: NP_196196; AtWOX8: NP_199410; AtWOX9: NP_180944; AtWOX10: NP_173494; AtWOX11: NP_187016; AtWOX12: NP_197283; AtWOX13: NP_195280; AtWOX14: NP_173493. TaWOX5: MN412513; TaWUS-A: MW452946; TaWUS-B: MW452947; TaWUS-D: MW452945.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Shoot regeneration of the immature embryos of different wheat genotypes promoted by the TaWOX5 gene.

a: Shoot regeneration of the wheat embryos transformed with control vectors. b: Shoot regeneration of the wheat embryos transformed with TaWOX5 gene containing vector. The calli on plates were some overcrowding.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Detection of transgenic wheat plants by QuickStix Kit and PCR.

a: QuickStix Kit assay for the Bar protein; 1-21: transgenic plants; 22: wild-type Fielder. b: PCR detection for Bar gene, this testing experiment being repeated at least three times with similar results; 1: plasmid of TaWOX5 vector; 2: wild-type Fielder; 3-24: transgenic plants.

Source data

Extended data fig. 4.

Comparison of the transient infection efficiency of different wheat varieties by expressing anthocyanin biosynthesis genes ZmR and ZmC1 as visible markers.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Normal growth of the regeneration shoots and roots derived from a transformed immature embryo of Fielder using the TaWOX5 gene in three experimental replicates.

a : The growth status of regeneration shoots; b : the growth status of the transgenic plants with healthy shoots and roots.

Extended Data Fig. 6

The plasmids map of pWMB111-TaWOX5 and TaWOX5- SpCas9-TaQ .

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Supplementary Tables 1–5 and the sequences of TaWOX5 and TaWUS used in this study.

Reporting Summary

Source data fig. 1.

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed gels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Wang, K., Shi, L., Liang, X. et al. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic transformation. Nat. Plants 8 , 110–117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01085-8

Download citation

Received : 20 May 2021

Accepted : 01 December 2021

Published : 13 January 2022

Issue Date : February 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01085-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Facts, uncertainties, and opportunities in wheat molecular improvement.

  • Fariba Rafiei
  • Jochum Wiersma
  • Mohsen Mohammadi

Heredity (2024)

Inadequate lysine content of wheat endosperm proteins - possibility of correcting it by CRISPR-Cas system of genome editing

  • Hirendra Kumar Das
  • Megha Kaushik
  • Pranab Kumar Mandal

Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2024)

Simultaneous genetic transformation and genome editing of mixed lines in soybean (Glycine max) and maize (Zea mays)

  • Michelle Valentine
  • David Butruille
  • Yurong Chen

aBIOTECH (2024)

Finger millet: a hero in the making to combat food insecurity

  • Hallie Wright
  • Katrien M. Devos

Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2024)

Current approaches and future potential for delivering CRISPR/Cas components in oilseeds and millets

  • Satabdi Ghosh

The Nucleus (2024)

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

uk essay gene transformation

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

horticulturae-logo

Article Menu

uk essay gene transformation

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Genetic transformation of potato without antibiotic-assisted selection.

uk essay gene transformation

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. plant material and general conditions, 2.2. potato regeneration media, 2.3. agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of potato with and without antibiotic selection, 2.4. monitoring of green and red fluorescence, 2.5. molecular analysis, 2.6. statistical analysis, 3.1. efficiency of adventitious plant regeneration of potato cultivars, 3.2. agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of potato without antibiotic–assisted selection, 3.2.1. efficiency of transient expression under selective- and non-selective cultivation, 3.2.2. efficiency of regeneration of gfp-positive transgenic plants under non-selective and selective cultivation, 3.2.3. impact of the regeneration type on the identification of gfp-positive plants under non-selective pressure, 3.2.4. efficiency of antibiotic-free genetic transformation of two potato cultivars using rfp monitoring, 4. discussion, supplementary materials, author contributions, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

  • An, G.; Watson, B.D.; Chiang, C.C. Transformation of Tobacco, Tomato, Potato, and Arabidopsis thaliana Using a Binary Ti Vector System. Plant Physiol. 1986 , 81 , 301–305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Si, H.; Zhang, N.; Tang, X.; Yang, J.; Wen, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X. Transgenic Research in Tuber and Root Crops. In Genetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 225–248. ISBN 9780128104392. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Del Mar Martínez-Prada, M.; Curtin, S.J.; Gutiérrez-González, J.J. Potato improvement through genetic engineering. GM Crops Food 2021 , 12 , 479–496. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nahirñak, V.; Almasia, N.I.; González, M.N.; Massa, G.A.; Décima Oneto, C.A.; Feingold, S.E.; Hopp, H.E.; Vazquez Rovere, C. State of the Art of Genetic Engineering in Potato: From the First Report to Its Future Potential. Front. Plant Sci. 2021 , 12 , 768233. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Hameed, A.; Zaidi, S.S.-E.-A.; Shakir, S.; Mansoor, S. Applications of New Breeding Technologies for Potato Improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2018 , 9 , 925. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tuteja, N.; Verma, S.; Sahoo, R.K.; Raveendar, S.; Reddy, I.N.B.L. Recent advances in development of marker-free transgenic plants: Regulation and biosafety concern. J. Biosci. 2012 , 37 , 167–197. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Breyer, D.; Kopertekh, L.; Reheul, D. Alternatives to Antibiotic Resistance Marker Genes for In Vitro Selection of Genetically Modified Plants–Scientific Developments, Current Use, Operational Access and Biosafety Considerations. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2014 , 33 , 286–330. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Singh, R.; Kaur, N.; Praba, U.P.; Kaur, G.; Tanin, M.J.; Kumar, P.; Neelam, K.; Sandhu, J.S.; Vikal, Y. A Prospective Review on Selectable Marker-Free Genome Engineered Rice: Past, Present and Future Scientific Realm. Front. Genet. 2022 , 13 , 882836. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sharma, U.; Kaur, A.; Sandhu, J.S. Production of Marker-Free Transgenic Plants. In Agricultural Biotechnology: Latest Research and Trends ; Kumar Srivastava, D., Kumar Thakur, A., Kumar, P., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021; pp. 223–251. ISBN 978-981-16-2338-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matheka, J.M.; Anami, S.; Gethi, J.; Omer, R.A.; Alakonya, A.; Machuka, J.; Runo, S. A new double right border binary vector for producing marker-free transgenic plants. BMC Res. Notes 2013 , 6 , 448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Petri, C.; López-Noguera, S.; Wang, H.; García-Almodóvar, C.; Alburquerque, N.; Burgos, L. A chemical-inducible Cre-LoxP system allows for elimination of selection marker genes in transgenic apricot. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2012 , 110 , 337–346. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Ouyang, B.; Lu, Y.; Ye, Z. Chemical-induced autoexcision of selectable markers in elite tomato plants transformed with a gene conferring resistance to lepidopteran insects. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006 , 28 , 1247–1253. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Peng, A.; Xu, L.; He, Y.; Lei, T.; Yao, L.; Chen, S.; Zou, X. Efficient production of marker-free transgenic ‘Tarocco’ blood orange ( Citrus sinensis Osbeck) with enhanced resistance to citrus canker using a Cre/loxP site-recombination system. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2015 , 123 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Schaart, J.G.; Krens, F.A.; Pelgrom, K.T.B.; Mendes, O.; Rouwendal, G.J.A. Effective production of marker-free transgenic strawberry plants using inducible site-specific recombination and a bifunctional selectable marker gene. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2004 , 2 , 233–240. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vanblaere, T.; Szankowski, I.; Schaart, J.; Schouten, H.; Flachowsky, H.; Broggini, G.A.L.; Gessler, C. The development of a cisgenic apple plant. J. Biotechnol. 2011 , 154 , 304–311. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Timerbaev, V.; Mitiouchkina, T.; Pushin, A.; Dolgov, S. Production of Marker-Free Apple Plants Expressing the Supersweet Protein Gene Driven by Plant Promoter. Front. Plant Sci. 2019 , 10 , 388. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Pompili, V.; Dalla Costa, L.; Piazza, S.; Pindo, M.; Malnoy, M. Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-FLP/FRT-based gene editing system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020 , 18 , 845–858. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Righetti, L.; Djennane, S.; Berthelot, P.; Cournol, R.; Wilmot, N.; Loridon, K.; Vergne, E.; Chevreau, E. Elimination of the nptII marker gene in transgenic apple and pear with a chemically inducible R/Rs recombinase. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2014 , 117 , 335–348. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Orbegozo, J.; Solorzano, D.; Cuellar, W.J.; Bartolini, I.; Roman, M.L.; Ghislain, M.; Kreuze, J. Marker-free PLRV resistant potato mediated by Cre-loxP excision and RNAi. Transgenic Res. 2016 , 25 , 813–828. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Kondrák, M.; van der Meer, I.M.; Bánfalvi, Z. Generation of marker- and backbone-free transgenic potatoes by site-specific recombination and a bi-functional marker gene in a non-regular one-border agrobacterium transformation vector. Transgenic Res. 2006 , 15 , 729–737. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Khan, R.S.; Ntui, V.O.; Chin, D.P.; Nakamura, I.; Mii, M. Production of marker-free disease-resistant potato using isopentenyl transferase gene as a positive selection marker. Plant Cell Rep. 2011 , 30 , 587–597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ferradini, N.; Nicolia, A.; Capomaccio, S.; Veronesi, F.; Rosellini, D. Assessment of simple marker-free genetic transformation techniques in alfalfa. Plant Cell Rep. 2011 , 30 , 1991–2000. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bhatnagar, M.; Prasad, K.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Narasu, M.L.; Waliyar, F.; Sharma, K.K. An efficient method for the production of marker-free transgenic plants of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2010 , 29 , 495–502. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, B.; Xie, C.; Qiu, H. Production of selectable marker-free transgenic tobacco plants using a non-selection approach: Chimerism or escape, transgene inheritance, and efficiency. Plant Cell Rep. 2009 , 28 , 373–386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Richardson, T.; Thistleton, J.; Higgins, T.J.; Howitt, C.; Ayliffe, M. Efficient Agrobacterium transformation of elite wheat germplasm without selection. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2014 , 119 , 647–659. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vetten, N.d.; Wolters, A.-M.; Raemakers, K.; van der Meer, I.; ter Stege, R.; Heeres, E.; Heeres, P.; Visser, R. A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003 , 21 , 439–442. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jo, K.-R.; Kim, C.-J.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, T.-Y.; Bergervoet, M.; Jongsma, M.A.; Visser, R.G.F.; Jacobsen, E.; Vossen, J.H. Development of late blight resistant potatoes by cisgene stacking. BMC Biotechnol. 2014 , 14 , 50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bai, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, X.; Bai, D.; Zhang, W. Generation of double-virus-resistant marker-free transgenic potato plants. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2009 , 19 , 543–548. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Miroshnichenko, D.; Timerbaev, V.; Okuneva, A.; Klementyeva, A.; Sidorova, T.; Pushin, A.; Dolgov, S. Enhancement of resistance to PVY in intragenic marker-free potato plants by RNAi-mediated silencing of eIF4E translation initiation factors. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2020 , 140 , 691–705. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ahmad, R.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, M.D.; Phung, M.-N.; Chung, W.-I.; Lee, H.-S.; Kwak, S.-S.; Kwon, S.-Y. Development of selection marker-free transgenic potato plants with enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress. J. Plant Biol. 2008 , 51 , 401–407. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Haseloff, J.; Siemering, K.R. The uses of green fluorescent protein in plants. Methods Biochem. Anal. 2006 , 47 , 259–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
  • Miroshnichenko, D.; Firsov, A.; Timerbaev, V.; Kozlov, O.; Klementyeva, A.; Shaloiko, L.; Dolgov, S. Evaluation of Plant-Derived Promoters for Constitutive and Tissue-Specific Gene Expression in Potato. Plants 2020 , 9 , 1520. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Trujillo, C.; Rodríguez-Arango, E.; Jaramillo, S.; Hoyos, R.; Orduz, S.; Arango, R. One-step transformation of two Andean potato cultivars ( Solanum tuberosum L. subsp. andigena ). Plant Cell Rep. 2001 , 20 , 637–641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhu, Q.; Song, B.; Zhang, C.; Ou, Y.; Xie, C.; Liu, J. Construction and functional characteristics of tuber-specific and cold-inducible chimeric promoters in potato. Plant Cell Rep. 2008 , 27 , 47–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bradeen, J.M.; Iorizzo, M.; Mollov, D.S.; Raasch, J.; Kramer, L.C.; Millett, B.P.; Austin-Phillips, S.; Jiang, J.; Carputo, D. Higher copy numbers of the potato RB transgene correspond to enhanced transcript and late blight resistance levels. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009 , 22 , 437–446. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Collier, R.; Dasgupta, K.; Xing, Y.-P.; Hernandez, B.T.; Shao, M.; Rohozinski, D.; Kovak, E.; Lin, J.; de Oliveira, M.L.P.; Stover, E.; et al. Accurate measurement of transgene copy number in crop plants using droplet digital PCR. Plant J. 2017 , 90 , 1014–1025. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yevtushenko, D.P.; Misra, S. Spatiotemporal activities of Douglas-fir BiP Pro1 promoter in transgenic potato. Planta 2018 , 248 , 1569–1579. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

CultivarCombination of Phytohormones *Regeneration
Type
Efficiency of Plantlet
Regeneration (%)
Number of Plantlets
per Explant
Chicago3 Zea + 2 IAA+ 1 GA early/medium98.3 ± 3.315.2 ± 3.9
Indigo3 Zea-R + 0.5 IAAlate75.4 ± 2.82.4 ± 0.3
Lion Heart3 Zea + 2 IAA+ 1 GAlate93.1 ± 6.36.3 ± 0.4
La Strada3 Zea-R + 2 IAA+ 1 GAmedium97.8 ± 3.812.3 ± 2.9
Manhattan3 Zea + 0.5 IAA medium76.2 ± 10.63.5 ± 1.9
Pirol3 Zea + 0.5 IAA late100 ± 0.08.2 ± 2.0
#10-9-33 Zea + 2 IAA+ 1 GAlate100 ± 0.06.6 ± 1.8
#10-10-103 Zea + 0.5 IAAmedium93.6 ± 6.34.8 ± 0.6
#12-22-1293 Zea + 0.5 IAAearly100 ± 0.015.0 ± 1.6
#12-36-423 Zea + 0.5 IAAmedium/late95.0 ± 4.46.4 ± 2.1
CultivarRegeneration TypeNumber of
Explants with GFP+ Buds *
Number of Shoots
Regenerated (90 Days) *
Number of GFP+ Shoots
Detached from
Explants *
Number of Stable
Transgenic Events (GFP+) *
Percentage of GFP+ Stable Events per 100
Regenerated Shoots (%)
Transformation Efficiency with Antibiotic-
Assisted
Selection ** (%)
#12-22-129early36151966322.1 ± 0.4100
Chicagoearly/intermediate16155422150.9 ± 0.198
La Stradaintermediate30143440292.0 ± 0.547
#12-36-42intermediate/late3996450252.6 ± 0.468
Pirollate2991633161.8 ± 0.744
CultivarExperimentNumber of ExplantsNumber of PlantletsTransformation Efficiency, %
Inoculatedwith RFP+ Buds *with Stable RFP+
Plants
Regenerated (90 Days)Collected from Explants * Stable
Transgenic Events **
per 100
Regenerated Plantlets
per 100
Inoculated Explant
ChicagoI951511161724130.8011.6
II9112814812190.618.8
III1001411158319140.9111.0
IV1001613175022160.8813.0
Average0.80 ± 0.1811.1 ± 1.8
PirolI57955891471.198.8
II55945231271.347.3
III50855011161.2010.0
IV501064161561.4412.0
Total/Average Average1.29 ± 0.129.5 ± 2.0
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Miroshnichenko, D.; Klementyeva, A.; Sidorova, T.; Pushin, A.S.; Dolgov, S. Genetic Transformation of Potato without Antibiotic-Assisted Selection. Horticulturae 2024 , 10 , 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030222

Miroshnichenko D, Klementyeva A, Sidorova T, Pushin AS, Dolgov S. Genetic Transformation of Potato without Antibiotic-Assisted Selection. Horticulturae . 2024; 10(3):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030222

Miroshnichenko, Dmitry, Anna Klementyeva, Tatiana Sidorova, Alexander S. Pushin, and Sergey Dolgov. 2024. "Genetic Transformation of Potato without Antibiotic-Assisted Selection" Horticulturae 10, no. 3: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030222

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, supplementary material.

ZIP-Document (ZIP, 1046 KiB)

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

  1. Introduction to Genetic Transformation and DNA Essay

    uk essay gene transformation

  2. Gene Therapy and Genetic Enhancement

    uk essay gene transformation

  3. ⇉on mutations in the factor VIII gene Essay Example

    uk essay gene transformation

  4. GENETIC TRANSFORMATION OF INDICA RICE BPT5204 WITH CRY1Aa3 GENE Free

    uk essay gene transformation

  5. What is Gene Therapy Essay Example

    uk essay gene transformation

  6. Essay "Briefly illustrate how genetic factors such as dna turn into

    uk essay gene transformation

VIDEO

  1. Gene

  2. #Horizontal gene transfer| Transformation| Recombination| Bacterial Gene transfer methods

  3. Transcription of genetic code from DNA into RNA|#shorts #short #shortsviral #education

  4. super god gene [ transformation 🥶📈] #manhwa #manga #manhua #mangaedit #shorts #noviews

  5. Chapter 13

  6. Singapore #1 Personal Training Gym Testimonial

COMMENTS

  1. DNA Transformation in Bacteria

    Transformation is a process of horizontal gene transfer whereby DNA present in the environment of a cell is taken up by the cell. In this experiment the transformation involves the uptake of a plasmid containing a marker that results in ampicillin resistance by E. Coli bacteria through electroporation. -Electroporation.

  2. Genetic Transformation in E Coli

    Genetic Transformation in E Coli. Genetic Transformation is the act of changing of DNA in an organism by adding new genes, which may be done in multiple ways. The addition of new genes to DNA could have an almost infinite amount of advantages, ranging from studying the cultures of bacteria that become immune to modern medicine, to making ...

  3. Transformation In Plasmids

    Transformation In Plasmids. This experiments aims to demonstrate the phenomenon of transformation. A plasmid was introduced into competent Escherichia coli (E.coli) cells by electroporation, plated out on a solid medium and left to divide and multiply. Through this experiment, the idea and importance of gene transformation in genetic ...

  4. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent

    Hui, F. M. & Morrison, D. A. Genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae: nucleotide sequence analysis shows comA, a gene required for competence induction, to be a member of the bacterial ...

  5. Genetic Transformation in E Coli

    Genetic Transformation is the act of changing of DNA in an organism by adding new genes, which may be done in multiple ways. The addition of new genes to DNA could have an almost infinite amount of advantages, ranging from studying the cultures of bacteria that become immune to modern medicine, to making artificial animal proteins.

  6. AQA A Level Biology Revision Notes 2017

    CIE. Spanish Language & Literature. Past Papers. Other Subjects. Revision notes on 8.4.1 Recombinant DNA Technology for the AQA A Level Biology syllabus, written by the Biology experts at Save My Exams.

  7. Full article: Thinking the unthinkable: how did human germline genome

    1. Introduction. Two major policy reports in the UK and USA have recently sanctioned as ethically acceptable the use of human genetic engineering (HGE) to alter future generations - so called germline therapy - for the treatment of serious rare inherited conditions (National Academy of Sciences Citation 2017; Nuffield Council on Bioethics Citation 2018).

  8. Recent advances in crop transformation technologies

    The efficient delivery of gene-modification components into plant cells is a crucial first step of plant transformation and genome editing. Two major gene-delivery methodologies have been ...

  9. Bacterial Transformation of E-Coli

    Bacterial transformation is a really easy way to transform due to the fact that it is single- cell. In this lab experiment, E. coli bacteria is used because it is singled-cell. The pGLO plasmid will be inserted into E. coli bacteria, and it contains the gene for green fluorescence protein (GFP). According to Bacterial Transformation, with ...

  10. Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by ...

    How noncoding DNA determines gene expression in different cell types is a major unsolved problem, and critical downstream applications in human genetics depend on improved solutions. Here, we ...

  11. Overview of Genetic Transformation Essay

    Genetic transformation has a variety of applications, including the study of gene function, the production of recombinant proteins, and the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). For example, scientists can use genetic transformation to study the function of a particular gene by introducing a mutated version of the gene into a ...

  12. Genetic Transformation Lab Report

    Effect of Genetic Transformation of pGLO Plasmid Containing GFP Gene Using Heat Shock on E. Coli Growth and Ampicillin Resistance ¬Introduction Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) is a gene that codes for the green fluorescence of the bioluminescent jellyfish (Aequorea victoria) and the sea pansy (Renilla reniformus), making the species glow in the dark (Chalfie, 1995).

  13. Bacterial Genetics

    Bacterial Conjugation. Conjugation is the method of transfer of genetic material from one bacteria to another placed in contact. This method was proposed by Lederberg and Tatum. They discovered that the F-factor can move between E.coli cells and proposed the concept of conjugation.

  14. Transformation of Escherichia Coli (E. Coli)

    Transformation of Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) INTRODUCTION: Transformation is a process whereby the genetic materials of a cell are altered by introducing DNA (exogenous DNA) from the surrounding environment through the cell membrane of the organism. It involves the uptake of DNA from either a plasmid or a small fragment of linear DNA by a ...

  15. Gene Therapy explained: Changing our bodies' recipe to treat disease

    Gene therapy helps to treat some inherited diseases passed on from parent to child that don't have a treatment or cure yet. Many different gene therapies are currently in development all over the world for many inherited diseases such as those that affect the ability of our blood's immune system to fight off infections that make us ill.

  16. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic

    The WUS gene is an important regulator of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis 10,16.Based on the Arabidopsis WUS sequence, two wheat homologous genes (TaWOX5 and TaWUS) were obtained.TaWOX5 is ...

  17. Subject: Transformation, Genetic / Genre: Essays / Story Section: After

    Search Constraints Start Over You searched for: Subject Transformation, Genetic Remove constraint Subject: Transformation, Genetic Genre Essays Remove constraint Genre: Essays Story Section After the Discovery: The Transforming Principle's Reception by the Scientific Community Remove constraint Story Section: After the Discovery: The Transforming Principle's Reception by the Scientific ...

  18. Transfer of Plasmid Puc18 Into Escherichia. Coli Strain

    Coli Strain. The aim of the practical is to study the transfer of plasmid pUC18 into Escherichia. coli strain DH5α via the process of artificial transformation. Plasmid pUC18 is a 2.7kb genetically engineered plasmid, which consists of an ampicillin resistance gene (ampR) and a gene for the enzyme beta-galactosidase (lac Z).

  19. Genetic Transformation in E Coli

    Genetic Transformation is the act of changing of DNA in an organism by adding new genes, which may be done in multiple ways. The addition of new genes to DNA could have an almost infinite amount of advantages, ranging from studying the cultures of bacteria that become immune to modern medicine, to making artificial animal proteins.

  20. GFP Transformation Into E Coli Biology Essay

    GFP Transformation Into E Coli Biology Essay. Genetic transformation is the technique of introducing a recombinant DNA into a living cell. In this experiment, we introduced pGLO plasmid into E. Coli bacteria through the heat-shock method. CaCl2 solution was used to make the E. coli cells competent.

  21. Horticulturae

    The genetic engineering of plants often relies on the use of antibiotic or herbicide resistance genes for the initial selection of primary transgenic events. Nevertheless, the commercial release of genetically modified crops containing any marker gene encounters several challenges stemming from the lack of consumer acceptance. The development of strategies enabling the generation of marker ...