theoretical analysis dissertation

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

Knowledge Base
Dissertation

Theoretical Framework Example for a Thesis or Dissertation

Published on October 14, 2015 by Sarah Vinz . Revised on July 18, 2023 by Tegan George.

Your theoretical framework defines the key concepts in your research, suggests relationships between them, and discusses relevant theories based on your literature review .

A strong theoretical framework gives your research direction. It allows you to convincingly interpret, explain, and generalize from your findings and show the relevance of your thesis or dissertation topic in your field.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Sample problem statement and research questions, sample theoretical framework, your theoretical framework, other interesting articles.

Your theoretical framework is based on:

Your problem statement
Your research questions
Your literature review

A new boutique downtown is struggling with the fact that many of their online customers do not return to make subsequent purchases. This is a big issue for the otherwise fast-growing store.Management wants to increase customer loyalty. They believe that improved customer satisfaction will play a major role in achieving their goal of increased return customers.

To investigate this problem, you have zeroed in on the following problem statement, objective, and research questions:

Problem : Many online customers do not return to make subsequent purchases.
Objective : To increase the quantity of return customers.
Research question : How can the satisfaction of the boutique’s online customers be improved in order to increase the quantity of return customers?

The concepts of “customer loyalty” and “customer satisfaction” are clearly central to this study, along with their relationship to the likelihood that a customer will return. Your theoretical framework should define these concepts and discuss theories about the relationship between these variables.

Some sub-questions could include:

What is the relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction?
How satisfied and loyal are the boutique’s online customers currently?
What factors affect the satisfaction and loyalty of the boutique’s online customers?

As the concepts of “loyalty” and “customer satisfaction” play a major role in the investigation and will later be measured, they are essential concepts to define within your theoretical framework .

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free!

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Try for free

Below is a simplified example showing how you can describe and compare theories in your thesis or dissertation . In this example, we focus on the concept of customer satisfaction introduced above.

Customer satisfaction

Thomassen (2003, p. 69) defines customer satisfaction as “the perception of the customer as a result of consciously or unconsciously comparing their experiences with their expectations.” Kotler & Keller (2008, p. 80) build on this definition, stating that customer satisfaction is determined by “the degree to which someone is happy or disappointed with the observed performance of a product in relation to his or her expectations.”

Performance that is below expectations leads to a dissatisfied customer, while performance that satisfies expectations produces satisfied customers (Kotler & Keller, 2003, p. 80).

The definition of Zeithaml and Bitner (2003, p. 86) is slightly different from that of Thomassen. They posit that “satisfaction is the consumer fulfillment response. It is a judgement that a product or service feature, or the product of service itself, provides a pleasurable level of consumption-related fulfillment.” Zeithaml and Bitner’s emphasis is thus on obtaining a certain satisfaction in relation to purchasing.

Thomassen’s definition is the most relevant to the aims of this study, given the emphasis it places on unconscious perception. Although Zeithaml and Bitner, like Thomassen, say that customer satisfaction is a reaction to the experience gained, there is no distinction between conscious and unconscious comparisons in their definition.

The boutique claims in its mission statement that it wants to sell not only a product, but also a feeling. As a result, unconscious comparison will play an important role in the satisfaction of its customers. Thomassen’s definition is therefore more relevant.

Thomassen’s Customer Satisfaction Model

According to Thomassen, both the so-called “value proposition” and other influences have an impact on final customer satisfaction. In his satisfaction model (Fig. 1), Thomassen shows that word-of-mouth, personal needs, past experiences, and marketing and public relations determine customers’ needs and expectations.

These factors are compared to their experiences, with the interplay between expectations and experiences determining a customer’s satisfaction level. Thomassen’s model is important for this study as it allows us to determine both the extent to which the boutique’s customers are satisfied, as well as where improvements can be made.

Figure 1 Customer satisfaction creation

Of course, you could analyze the concepts more thoroughly and compare additional definitions to each other. You could also discuss the theories and ideas of key authors in greater detail and provide several models to illustrate different concepts.

If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

Research bias

Anchoring bias
Halo effect
The Baader–Meinhof phenomenon
The placebo effect
Nonresponse bias
Deep learning
Generative AI
Machine learning
Reinforcement learning
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning

(AI) Tools

Grammar Checker
Paraphrasing Tool
Text Summarizer
AI Detector
Plagiarism Checker
Citation Generator

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Vinz, S. (2023, July 18). Theoretical Framework Example for a Thesis or Dissertation. Scribbr. Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/theoretical-framework-example/

Is this article helpful?

Sarah's academic background includes a Master of Arts in English, a Master of International Affairs degree, and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. She loves the challenge of finding the perfect formulation or wording and derives much satisfaction from helping students take their academic writing up a notch.

Other students also liked

What is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, what is your plagiarism score.

Translators
Graphic Designers
Editing Services
Academic Editing Services
Admissions Editing Services
Admissions Essay Editing Services
AI Content Editing Services
APA Style Editing Services
Application Essay Editing Services
Book Editing Services
Business Editing Services
Capstone Paper Editing Services
Children's Book Editing Services
College Application Editing Services
College Essay Editing Services
Copy Editing Services
Developmental Editing Services
Dissertation Editing Services
eBook Editing Services
English Editing Services
Horror Story Editing Services
Legal Editing Services
Line Editing Services
Manuscript Editing Services
MLA Style Editing Services
Novel Editing Services
Paper Editing Services
Personal Statement Editing Services
Research Paper Editing Services
Résumé Editing Services
Scientific Editing Services
Short Story Editing Services
Statement of Purpose Editing Services
Substantive Editing Services
Thesis Editing Services

Proofreading

Proofreading Services
Admissions Essay Proofreading Services
Children's Book Proofreading Services
Legal Proofreading Services
Novel Proofreading Services
Personal Statement Proofreading Services
Research Proposal Proofreading Services
Statement of Purpose Proofreading Services

Translation

Translation Services

Graphic Design

Graphic Design Services
Dungeons & Dragons Design Services
Sticker Design Services
Writing Services

Please enter the email address you used for your account. Your sign in information will be sent to your email address after it has been verified.

6 Steps to Mastering the Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation

As the pivotal section of your dissertation, the theoretical framework will be the lens through which your readers should evaluate your research. It's also a necessary part of your writing and research processes from which every written section will be built.

In their journal article titled Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your "house" , authors Cynthia Grant and Azadeh Osanloo write:

The theoretical framework is one of the most important aspects in the research process, yet is often misunderstood by doctoral candidates as they prepare their dissertation research study. The importance of theory-driven thinking and acting is emphasized in relation to the selection of a topic, the development of research questions, the conceptualization of the literature review, the design approach, and the analysis plan for the dissertation study. Using a metaphor of the "blueprint" of a house, this article explains the application of a theoretical framework in a dissertation. Administrative Issues Journal

They continue in their paper to discuss how architects and contractors understand that prior to building a house, there must be a blueprint created. This blueprint will then serve as a guide for everyone involved in the construction of the home, including those building the foundation, installing the plumbing and electrical systems, etc. They then state, We believe the blueprint is an appropriate analogy of the theoretical framework of the dissertation.

As with drawing and creating any blueprint, it is often the most difficult part of the building process. Many potential conflicts must be considered and mitigated, and much thought must be put into how the foundation will support the rest of the home. Without proper consideration on the front end, the entire structure could be at risk.

Your theoretical framework is the blueprint for your entire dissertation.

With this in mind, I'm going to discuss six steps to mastering the theoretical framework section—the "blueprint" for your dissertation. If you follow these steps and complete the checklist included, your blueprint is guaranteed to be a solid one.

Complete your review of literature first

In order to identify the scope of your theoretical framework, you'll need to address research that has already been completed by others, as well as gaps in the research. Understanding this, it's clear why you'll need to complete your review of literature before you can adequately write a theoretical framework for your dissertation or thesis.

Simply put, before conducting any extensive research on a topic or hypothesis, you need to understand where the gaps are and how they can be filled. As will be mentioned in a later step, it's important to note within your theoretical framework if you have closed any gaps in the literature through your research. It's also important to know the research that has laid a foundation for the current knowledge, including any theories, assumptions, or studies that have been done that you can draw on for your own. Without performing this necessary step, you're likely to produce research that is redundant, and therefore not likely to be published.

Understand the purpose of a theoretical framework

When you present a research problem, an important step in doing so is to provide context and background to that specific problem. This allows your reader to understand both the scope and the purpose of your research, while giving you a direction in your writing. Just as a blueprint for a home needs to provide needed context to all of the builders and professionals involved in the building process, so does the theoretical framework of your dissertation.

So, in building your theoretical framework, there are several details that need to be considered and explained, including:

The definition of any concepts or theories you're building on or exploring (this is especially important if it is a theory that is taken from another discipline or is relatively new).
The context in which this concept has been explored in the past.
The important literature that has already been published on the concept or theory, including citations.
The context in which you plan to explore the concept or theory. You can briefly mention your intended methods used, along with methods that have been used in the past—but keep in mind that there will be a separate section of your dissertation to present these in detail.
Any gaps that you hope to fill in the research
Any limitations encountered by past researchers and any that you encountered in your own exploration of the topic.
Basically, your theoretical framework helps to give your reader a general understanding of the research problem, how it has already been explored, and where your research falls in the scope of it. In such, be sure to keep it written in present tense, since it is research that is presently being done. When you refer to past research by others, you can do so in past tense, but anything related to your own research should be written in the present.

Use your theoretical framework to justify your research

In your literature review, you'll focus on finding research that has been conducted that is pertinent to your own study. This could be literature that establishes theories connected with your research, or provides pertinent analytic models. You will then mention these theories or models in your own theoretical framework and justify why they are the basis of—or relevant to—your research.

Basically, think of your theoretical framework as a quick, powerful way to justify to your reader why this research is important. If you are expanding upon past research by other scholars, your theoretical framework should mention the foundation they've laid and why it is important to build on that, or how it needs to be applied to a more modern concept. If there are gaps in the research on certain topics or theories, and your research fills these gaps, mention that in your theoretical framework, as well. It is your opportunity to justify the work you've done in a scientific context—both to your dissertation committee and to any publications interested in publishing your work.

Keep it within three to five pages

While there are usually no hard and fast rules related to the length of your theoretical framework, it is most common to keep it within three to five pages. This length should be enough to provide all of the relevant information to your reader without going into depth about the theories or assumptions mentioned. If you find yourself needing many more pages to write your theoretical framework, it is likely that you've failed to provide a succinct explanation for a theory, concept, or past study. Remember—you'll have ample opportunity throughout the course of writing your dissertation to expand and expound on these concepts, past studies, methods, and hypotheses. Your theoretical framework is not the place for these details.

If you've written an abstract, consider your theoretical framework to be somewhat of an extended abstract. It should offer a glimpse of the entirety of your research without going into a detailed explanation of the methods or background of it. In many cases, chiseling the theoretical framework down to the three to five-page length is a process of determining whether detail is needed in establishing understanding for your reader.

Reducing your theoretical framework to three to five pages is a process of chiseling down the excess details that should be included in the separate sections of your dissertation

Use models and other graphics

Since your theoretical framework should clarify complicated theories or assumptions related to your research, it's often a good idea to include models and other helpful graphics to achieve this aim. If space is an issue, most formats allow you to include these illustrations or models in the appendix of your paper and refer to them within the main text.

Use a checklist after completing your first draft

You should consider the following questions as you draft your theoretical framework and check them off as a checklist after completing your first draft:

Have the main theories and models related to your research been presented and briefly explained? In other words, does it offer an explicit statement of assumptions and/or theories that allows the reader to make a critical evaluation of them?
Have you correctly cited the main scientific articles on the subject?
Does it tell the reader about current knowledge related to the assumptions/theories and any gaps in that knowledge?
Does it offer information related to notable connections between concepts?
Does it include a relevant theory that forms the basis of your hypotheses and methods?
Does it answer the question of "why" your research is valid and important? In other words, does it provide scientific justification for your research?
If your research fills a gap in the literature, does your theoretical framework state this explicitly?
Does it include the constructs and variables (both independent and dependent) that are relevant to your study?
Does it state assumptions and propositions that are relevant to your research (along with the guiding theories related to these)?
Does it "frame" your entire research, giving it direction and a backbone to support your hypotheses?
Are your research questions answered?
Is it logical?
Is it free of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and syntax errors?

A final note

In conclusion, I would like to leave you with a quote from Grant and Osanloo:

The importance of utilizing a theoretical framework in a dissertation study cannot be stressed enough. The theoretical framework is the foundation from which all knowledge is constructed (metaphorically and literally) for a research study. It serves as the structure and support for the rationale for the study, the problem statement, the purpose, the significance, and the research questions. The theoretical framework provides a grounding base, or an anchor, for the literature review, and most importantly, the methods and analysis. Administrative Issues Journal

How to Write an Effective Thesis Discussion

201 Online Research Databases and Search Engines

Academic Writing Advice
All Blog Posts
Writing Advice
Admissions Writing Advice
Book Writing Advice
Short Story Advice
Employment Writing Advice
Business Writing Advice
Web Content Advice
Article Writing Advice
Magazine Writing Advice
Grammar Advice
Dialect Advice
Editing Advice
Freelance Advice
Legal Writing Advice
Poetry Advice
Graphic Design Advice
Logo Design Advice
Translation Advice
Blog Reviews
Short Story Award Winners
Scholarship Winners

Need an academic editor before submitting your work?

How it works

Theoretical Framework for Dissertation – What and How

Published by Anastasia Lois at August 13th, 2021 , Revised On August 22, 2023

The theoretical framework is one of the most infamous aspects of a dissertation , but it provides a strong scientific research base. You are likely to produce a first-class dissertation if the theoretical framework is appropriate and well-thought-out.

But what is a theoretical framework? And how do you develop a theoretical framework for your dissertation?

Content for Theoretical Framework

Your theoretical framework of a dissertation should incorporate existing theories that are relevant to your study. It will also include defining the terms mentioned in the hypothesis , research questions , and problem statement . All these concepts should be clearly identified as the first step.

Theoretical Framework Goals

You will need to identify the ideas and theories used for your chosen subject topic once you have determined the problem statement and research questions .
You can frame your study by presenting the theoretical framework, reflecting that you have enough knowledge about your topic, relevant models, and theories.
The theories you choose to investigate will provide direction to your research, and you can continue to make informed choices at different stages of the dissertation writing process .
The theoretical framework bases are the scientific theories that justify your research; therefore, you must use them appropriately for referencing your investigation.

1. Select Key Concepts Sample problem statement and research questions: According to the company X report, many customers do not return after an online purchase. The company director wants to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty to achieve the long-term goal of the company. To investigate this issue, the researcher can base their research around the following problem statement, objective, and research questions: Problem: Many customers do not return after an online purchase. Objective: To improve customer satisfaction and thereby achieve long-term goals. Research question: How can online customers’ loyalty increase by increasing customer satisfaction? Sub-Questions: 1. How can you relate customer satisfaction with customer loyalty? 2. How are the online customers of company X loyal and satisfied at present? 3. What are the factors affecting online customers’ loyalty and satisfaction? The satisfaction and loyalty concepts are critical to this research; therefore, will be determined as part of this study. These are the key terms that will have to be defined in the theoretical framework for the dissertation.

2. Define and Evaluate Relevant Concepts, Theories, and Models

You will be required to review existing relevant literature to determine how other researchers have defined the key terms in the past. The definitions proposed by different scholars can then be compared critically and analytically. The last step is to choose the best concepts and their definitions matching your case.

It is also necessary to identify the relationships between the terms. Whether you are applying or not applying the existing concepts and models in your study, you will need to present your arguments and justify your choices.

3. Adding Value to the Existing Knowledge

In addition to analyzing concepts and theories proposed by other theorists, you might also want to demonstrate how your own research will contribute to the existing knowledge. Here are some questions for you to consider in this regard;

Are you going to contribute new evidence through primary research or testing an existing theory?
Will you understand and interpret data with the help of a theory?
Do you wish to challenge, critique, or evaluate an existing theory?
Is there a new exclusive method through which you will combine different theories proposed by other scholars?

Types of Research Questions you can Answer

The descriptive research questions only use the theoretical framework because their answer requires literature research. For instance, ‘how can you relate customer satisfaction with customer loyalty?’ A single theory can answer this question sufficiently.

The sub-question, ‘How the online customers of company X are loyal and satisfied at present?’ cannot be answered theoretically because it requires qualitative and quantitative research data.

Theoretical Framework Structure

There is no fixed pattern to structure the theoretical framework for the dissertation . However, you can create a logical structure by drawing on your hypothesis/research question and defining important terms.

For instance, write a paragraph containing key terms, hypotheses, or research questions and explain the relevant models and theories.

Also See: Organizing Academic Research Papers: Theoretical Framework

Length of Theoretical Framework of Dissertation

The length of the theoretical framework is usually three to five pages. You can also include the graphical framework to give your readers a clear insight into your theoretical framework. For instance, below is the graphical figure of an example theoretical framework for classroom management.

Sample Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation

Here is a theoretical framework example to provide you with a sense of the essential parts of the dissertation.

How can ResearchProspect Help?

ResearchProspect is a UK-registered firm that provides academic support to students around the world.

We specialize in completing design projects, literature reviews , essays , reports , coursework , exam notes , statistical analysis , primary and empirical research, dissertations , case studies, academic posters , and much more.

Getting help from our expert academics is quick and simple. All you have to do is complete our online order form and get your paper delivered to your email address well before your due deadline.

Looking for dissertation help?

Researchprospect to the rescue then.

We have expert writers on our team who are skilled at helping students with dissertations across a variety of disciplines. Guaranteeing 100% satisfaction!

Frequently Asked Questions

How do i choose a theoretical framework for my dissertation.

To choose a theoretical framework for your dissertation:

Define research objectives.
Identify relevant disciplines.
Review existing theories.
Select one aligning with your topic.
Consider its applicability.
Justify your choice based on relevance and depth.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

Theoretical Framework
Purpose of Guide
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Glossary of Research Terms
Reading Research Effectively
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Academic Writing Style
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
Research Process Video Series
Executive Summary
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
The Research Problem/Question
Citation Tracking
Content Alert Services
Evaluating Sources
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Tiertiary Sources
Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Insiderness
Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes?
Further Readings
Generative AI and Writing
USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
Bibliography

Theories are formulated to explain, predict, and understand phenomena and, in many cases, to challenge and extend existing knowledge within the limits of critical bounded assumptions or predictions of behavior. The theoretical framework is the structure that can hold or support a theory of a research study. The theoretical framework encompasses not just the theory, but the narrative explanation about how the researcher engages in using the theory and its underlying assumptions to investigate the research problem. It is the structure of your paper that summarizes concepts, ideas, and theories derived from prior research studies and which was synthesized in order to form a conceptual basis for your analysis and interpretation of meaning found within your research.

Abend, Gabriel. "The Meaning of Theory." Sociological Theory 26 (June 2008): 173–199; Kivunja, Charles. "Distinguishing between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework: A Systematic Review of Lessons from the Field." International Journal of Higher Education 7 (December 2018): 44-53; Swanson, Richard A. Theory Building in Applied Disciplines . San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers 2013; Varpio, Lara, Elise Paradis, Sebastian Uijtdehaage, and Meredith Young. "The Distinctions between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework." Academic Medicine 95 (July 2020): 989-994.

Importance of Theory and a Theoretical Framework

Theories can be unfamiliar to the beginning researcher because they are rarely applied in high school social studies curriculum and, as a result, can come across as unfamiliar and imprecise when first introduced as part of a writing assignment. However, in their most simplified form, a theory is simply a set of assumptions or predictions about something you think will happen based on existing evidence and that can be tested to see if those outcomes turn out to be true. Of course, it is slightly more deliberate than that, therefore, summarized from Kivunja (2018, p. 46), here are the essential characteristics of a theory.

It is logical and coherent
It has clear definitions of terms or variables, and has boundary conditions [i.e., it is not an open-ended statement]
It has a domain where it applies
It has clearly described relationships among variables
It describes, explains, and makes specific predictions
It comprises of concepts, themes, principles, and constructs
It must have been based on empirical data [i.e., it is not a guess]
It must have made claims that are subject to testing, been tested and verified
It must be clear and concise
Its assertions or predictions must be different and better than those in existing theories
Its predictions must be general enough to be applicable to and understood within multiple contexts
Its assertions or predictions are relevant, and if applied as predicted, will result in the predicted outcome
The assertions and predictions are not immutable, but subject to revision and improvement as researchers use the theory to make sense of phenomena
Its concepts and principles explain what is going on and why
Its concepts and principles are substantive enough to enable us to predict a future

Given these characteristics, a theory can best be understood as the foundation from which you investigate assumptions or predictions derived from previous studies about the research problem, but in a way that leads to new knowledge and understanding as well as, in some cases, discovering how to improve the relevance of the theory itself or to argue that the theory is outdated and a new theory needs to be formulated based on new evidence.

A theoretical framework consists of concepts and, together with their definitions and reference to relevant scholarly literature, existing theory that is used for your particular study. The theoretical framework must demonstrate an understanding of theories and concepts that are relevant to the topic of your research paper and that relate to the broader areas of knowledge being considered.

The theoretical framework is most often not something readily found within the literature . You must review course readings and pertinent research studies for theories and analytic models that are relevant to the research problem you are investigating. The selection of a theory should depend on its appropriateness, ease of application, and explanatory power.

The theoretical framework strengthens the study in the following ways :

An explicit statement of theoretical assumptions permits the reader to evaluate them critically.
The theoretical framework connects the researcher to existing knowledge. Guided by a relevant theory, you are given a basis for your hypotheses and choice of research methods.
Articulating the theoretical assumptions of a research study forces you to address questions of why and how. It permits you to intellectually transition from simply describing a phenomenon you have observed to generalizing about various aspects of that phenomenon.
Having a theory helps you identify the limits to those generalizations. A theoretical framework specifies which key variables influence a phenomenon of interest and highlights the need to examine how those key variables might differ and under what circumstances.
The theoretical framework adds context around the theory itself based on how scholars had previously tested the theory in relation their overall research design [i.e., purpose of the study, methods of collecting data or information, methods of analysis, the time frame in which information is collected, study setting, and the methodological strategy used to conduct the research].

By virtue of its applicative nature, good theory in the social sciences is of value precisely because it fulfills one primary purpose: to explain the meaning, nature, and challenges associated with a phenomenon, often experienced but unexplained in the world in which we live, so that we may use that knowledge and understanding to act in more informed and effective ways.

The Conceptual Framework. College of Education. Alabama State University; Corvellec, Hervé, ed. What is Theory?: Answers from the Social and Cultural Sciences . Stockholm: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2013; Asher, Herbert B. Theory-Building and Data Analysis in the Social Sciences . Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1984; Drafting an Argument. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Kivunja, Charles. "Distinguishing between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework: A Systematic Review of Lessons from the Field." International Journal of Higher Education 7 (2018): 44-53; Omodan, Bunmi Isaiah. "A Model for Selecting Theoretical Framework through Epistemology of Research Paradigms." African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies 4 (2022): 275-285; Ravitch, Sharon M. and Matthew Riggan. Reason and Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research . Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2017; Trochim, William M.K. Philosophy of Research. Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2006; Jarvis, Peter. The Practitioner-Researcher. Developing Theory from Practice . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.

Strategies for Developing the Theoretical Framework

I. Developing the Framework

Here are some strategies to develop of an effective theoretical framework:

Examine your thesis title and research problem . The research problem anchors your entire study and forms the basis from which you construct your theoretical framework.
Brainstorm about what you consider to be the key variables in your research . Answer the question, "What factors contribute to the presumed effect?"
Review related literature to find how scholars have addressed your research problem. Identify the assumptions from which the author(s) addressed the problem.
List the constructs and variables that might be relevant to your study. Group these variables into independent and dependent categories.
Review key social science theories that are introduced to you in your course readings and choose the theory that can best explain the relationships between the key variables in your study [note the Writing Tip on this page].
Discuss the assumptions or propositions of this theory and point out their relevance to your research.

A theoretical framework is used to limit the scope of the relevant data by focusing on specific variables and defining the specific viewpoint [framework] that the researcher will take in analyzing and interpreting the data to be gathered. It also facilitates the understanding of concepts and variables according to given definitions and builds new knowledge by validating or challenging theoretical assumptions.

II. Purpose

Think of theories as the conceptual basis for understanding, analyzing, and designing ways to investigate relationships within social systems. To that end, the following roles served by a theory can help guide the development of your framework.

Means by which new research data can be interpreted and coded for future use,
Response to new problems that have no previously identified solutions strategy,
Means for identifying and defining research problems,
Means for prescribing or evaluating solutions to research problems,
Ways of discerning certain facts among the accumulated knowledge that are important and which facts are not,
Means of giving old data new interpretations and new meaning,
Means by which to identify important new issues and prescribe the most critical research questions that need to be answered to maximize understanding of the issue,
Means of providing members of a professional discipline with a common language and a frame of reference for defining the boundaries of their profession, and
Means to guide and inform research so that it can, in turn, guide research efforts and improve professional practice.

Adapted from: Torraco, R. J. “Theory-Building Research Methods.” In Swanson R. A. and E. F. Holton III , editors. Human Resource Development Handbook: Linking Research and Practice . (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1997): pp. 114-137; Jacard, James and Jacob Jacoby. Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists . New York: Guilford, 2010; Ravitch, Sharon M. and Matthew Riggan. Reason and Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research . Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2017; Sutton, Robert I. and Barry M. Staw. “What Theory is Not.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (September 1995): 371-384.

Structure and Writing Style

The theoretical framework may be rooted in a specific theory , in which case, your work is expected to test the validity of that existing theory in relation to specific events, issues, or phenomena. Many social science research papers fit into this rubric. For example, Peripheral Realism Theory, which categorizes perceived differences among nation-states as those that give orders, those that obey, and those that rebel, could be used as a means for understanding conflicted relationships among countries in Africa. A test of this theory could be the following: Does Peripheral Realism Theory help explain intra-state actions, such as, the disputed split between southern and northern Sudan that led to the creation of two nations?

However, you may not always be asked by your professor to test a specific theory in your paper, but to develop your own framework from which your analysis of the research problem is derived . Based upon the above example, it is perhaps easiest to understand the nature and function of a theoretical framework if it is viewed as an answer to two basic questions:

What is the research problem/question? [e.g., "How should the individual and the state relate during periods of conflict?"]
Why is your approach a feasible solution? [i.e., justify the application of your choice of a particular theory and explain why alternative constructs were rejected. I could choose instead to test Instrumentalist or Circumstantialists models developed among ethnic conflict theorists that rely upon socio-economic-political factors to explain individual-state relations and to apply this theoretical model to periods of war between nations].

The answers to these questions come from a thorough review of the literature and your course readings [summarized and analyzed in the next section of your paper] and the gaps in the research that emerge from the review process. With this in mind, a complete theoretical framework will likely not emerge until after you have completed a thorough review of the literature .

Just as a research problem in your paper requires contextualization and background information, a theory requires a framework for understanding its application to the topic being investigated. When writing and revising this part of your research paper, keep in mind the following:

Clearly describe the framework, concepts, models, or specific theories that underpin your study . This includes noting who the key theorists are in the field who have conducted research on the problem you are investigating and, when necessary, the historical context that supports the formulation of that theory. This latter element is particularly important if the theory is relatively unknown or it is borrowed from another discipline.
Position your theoretical framework within a broader context of related frameworks, concepts, models, or theories . As noted in the example above, there will likely be several concepts, theories, or models that can be used to help develop a framework for understanding the research problem. Therefore, note why the theory you've chosen is the appropriate one.
The present tense is used when writing about theory. Although the past tense can be used to describe the history of a theory or the role of key theorists, the construction of your theoretical framework is happening now.
You should make your theoretical assumptions as explicit as possible . Later, your discussion of methodology should be linked back to this theoretical framework.
Don’t just take what the theory says as a given! Reality is never accurately represented in such a simplistic way; if you imply that it can be, you fundamentally distort a reader's ability to understand the findings that emerge. Given this, always note the limitations of the theoretical framework you've chosen [i.e., what parts of the research problem require further investigation because the theory inadequately explains a certain phenomena].

The Conceptual Framework. College of Education. Alabama State University; Conceptual Framework: What Do You Think is Going On? College of Engineering. University of Michigan; Drafting an Argument. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Lynham, Susan A. “The General Method of Theory-Building Research in Applied Disciplines.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 4 (August 2002): 221-241; Tavallaei, Mehdi and Mansor Abu Talib. "A General Perspective on the Role of Theory in Qualitative Research." Journal of International Social Research 3 (Spring 2010); Ravitch, Sharon M. and Matthew Riggan. Reason and Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research . Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2017; Reyes, Victoria. Demystifying the Journal Article. Inside Higher Education; Trochim, William M.K. Philosophy of Research. Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2006; Weick, Karl E. “The Work of Theorizing.” In Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery . Richard Swedberg, editor. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014), pp. 177-194.

Writing Tip

Borrowing Theoretical Constructs from Other Disciplines

An increasingly important trend in the social and behavioral sciences is to think about and attempt to understand research problems from an interdisciplinary perspective. One way to do this is to not rely exclusively on the theories developed within your particular discipline, but to think about how an issue might be informed by theories developed in other disciplines. For example, if you are a political science student studying the rhetorical strategies used by female incumbents in state legislature campaigns, theories about the use of language could be derived, not only from political science, but linguistics, communication studies, philosophy, psychology, and, in this particular case, feminist studies. Building theoretical frameworks based on the postulates and hypotheses developed in other disciplinary contexts can be both enlightening and an effective way to be more engaged in the research topic.

CohenMiller, A. S. and P. Elizabeth Pate. "A Model for Developing Interdisciplinary Research Theoretical Frameworks." The Qualitative Researcher 24 (2019): 1211-1226; Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Undertheorize!

Do not leave the theory hanging out there in the introduction never to be mentioned again. Undertheorizing weakens your paper. The theoretical framework you describe should guide your study throughout the paper. Be sure to always connect theory to the review of pertinent literature and to explain in the discussion part of your paper how the theoretical framework you chose supports analysis of the research problem or, if appropriate, how the theoretical framework was found to be inadequate in explaining the phenomenon you were investigating. In that case, don't be afraid to propose your own theory based on your findings.

Yet Another Writing Tip

What's a Theory? What's a Hypothesis?

The terms theory and hypothesis are often used interchangeably in newspapers and popular magazines and in non-academic settings. However, the difference between theory and hypothesis in scholarly research is important, particularly when using an experimental design. A theory is a well-established principle that has been developed to explain some aspect of the natural world. Theories arise from repeated observation and testing and incorporates facts, laws, predictions, and tested assumptions that are widely accepted [e.g., rational choice theory; grounded theory; critical race theory].

A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in your study. For example, an experiment designed to look at the relationship between study habits and test anxiety might have a hypothesis that states, "We predict that students with better study habits will suffer less test anxiety." Unless your study is exploratory in nature, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen during the course of your research.

The key distinctions are:

A theory predicts events in a broad, general context; a hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of circumstances.
A theory has been extensively tested and is generally accepted among a set of scholars; a hypothesis is a speculative guess that has yet to be tested.

Cherry, Kendra. Introduction to Research Methods: Theory and Hypothesis. About.com Psychology; Gezae, Michael et al. Welcome Presentation on Hypothesis. Slideshare presentation.

Still Yet Another Writing Tip

Be Prepared to Challenge the Validity of an Existing Theory

Theories are meant to be tested and their underlying assumptions challenged; they are not rigid or intransigent, but are meant to set forth general principles for explaining phenomena or predicting outcomes. Given this, testing theoretical assumptions is an important way that knowledge in any discipline develops and grows. If you're asked to apply an existing theory to a research problem, the analysis will likely include the expectation by your professor that you should offer modifications to the theory based on your research findings.

Indications that theoretical assumptions may need to be modified can include the following:

Your findings suggest that the theory does not explain or account for current conditions or circumstances or the passage of time,
The study reveals a finding that is incompatible with what the theory attempts to explain or predict, or
Your analysis reveals that the theory overly generalizes behaviors or actions without taking into consideration specific factors revealed from your analysis [e.g., factors related to culture, nationality, history, gender, ethnicity, age, geographic location, legal norms or customs , religion, social class, socioeconomic status, etc.].

Philipsen, Kristian. "Theory Building: Using Abductive Search Strategies." In Collaborative Research Design: Working with Business for Meaningful Findings . Per Vagn Freytag and Louise Young, editors. (Singapore: Springer Nature, 2018), pp. 45-71; Shepherd, Dean A. and Roy Suddaby. "Theory Building: A Review and Integration." Journal of Management 43 (2017): 59-86.

<< Previous: The Research Problem/Question
Next: 5. The Literature Review >>
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2024 10:40 AM
URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

Knowledge Base
Dissertation

Example Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation or Thesis

Published on 8 July 2022 by Sarah Vinz . Revised on 10 October 2022.

Your theoretical framework defines the key concepts in your research, suggests relationships between them, and discusses relevant theories based on your literature review .

A strong theoretical framework gives your research direction, allowing you to convincingly interpret, explain, and generalise from your findings.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Sample problem statement and research questions, sample theoretical framework, your theoretical framework, frequently asked questions about sample theoretical frameworks.

Your theoretical framework is based on:

Your problem statement
Your research questions
Your literature review

To investigate this problem, you have zeroed in on the following problem statement, objective, and research questions:

Problem : Many online customers do not return to make subsequent purchases.
Objective : To increase the quantity of return customers.
Research question : How can the satisfaction of the boutique’s online customers be improved in order to increase the quantity of return customers?

The concepts of ‘customer loyalty’ and ‘customer satisfaction’ are clearly central to this study, along with their relationship to the likelihood that a customer will return. Your theoretical framework should define these concepts and discuss theories about the relationship between these variables.

Some sub-questions could include:

What is the relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction?
How satisfied and loyal are the boutique’s online customers currently?
What factors affect the satisfaction and loyalty of the boutique’s online customers?

As the concepts of ‘loyalty’ and ‘customer satisfaction’ play a major role in the investigation and will later be measured, they are essential concepts to define within your theoretical framework .

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Below is a simplified example showing how you can describe and compare theories. In this example, we focus on the concept of customer satisfaction introduced above.

Customer satisfaction

Thomassen (2003, p. 69) defines customer satisfaction as ‘the perception of the customer as a result of consciously or unconsciously comparing their experiences with their expectations’. Kotler and Keller (2008, p. 80) build on this definition, stating that customer satisfaction is determined by ‘the degree to which someone is happy or disappointed with the observed performance of a product in relation to his or her expectations’.

Performance that is below expectations leads to a dissatisfied customer, while performance that satisfies expectations produces satisfied customers (Kotler & Keller, 2003, p. 80).

The definition of Zeithaml and Bitner (2003, p. 86) is slightly different from that of Thomassen. They posit that ‘satisfaction is the consumer fulfillment response. It is a judgement that a product or service feature, or the product of service itself, provides a pleasurable level of consumption-related fulfillment.’ Zeithaml and Bitner’s emphasis is thus on obtaining a certain satisfaction in relation to purchasing.

Thomassen’s Customer Satisfaction Model

According to Thomassen, both the so-called ‘value proposition’ and other influences have an impact on final customer satisfaction. In his satisfaction model (Fig. 1), Thomassen shows that word-of-mouth, personal needs, past experiences, and marketing and public relations determine customers’ needs and expectations.

Figure 1 Customer satisfaction creation

Of course, you could analyse the concepts more thoroughly and compare additional definitions to each other. You could also discuss the theories and ideas of key authors in greater detail and provide several models to illustrate different concepts.

A theoretical framework can sometimes be integrated into a literature review chapter , but it can also be included as its own chapter or section in your dissertation . As a rule of thumb, if your research involves dealing with a lot of complex theories, it’s a good idea to include a separate theoretical framework chapter.

While a theoretical framework describes the theoretical underpinnings of your work based on existing research, a conceptual framework allows you to draw your own conclusions, mapping out the variables you may use in your study and the interplay between them.

A literature review and a theoretical framework are not the same thing and cannot be used interchangeably. While a theoretical framework describes the theoretical underpinnings of your work, a literature review critically evaluates existing research relating to your topic. You’ll likely need both in your dissertation .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Vinz, S. (2022, October 10). Example Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation or Thesis. Scribbr. Retrieved 25 March 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/example-theoretical-framework/

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

What is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, dissertation & thesis outline | example & free templates, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.

Understanding and solving intractable resource governance problems.

In the Press
Conferences and Talks
Exploring models of electronic wastes governance in the United States and Mexico: Recycling, risk and environmental justice
The Collaborative Resource Governance Lab (CoReGovLab)
Water Conflicts in Mexico: A Multi-Method Approach
Past projects
Publications and scholarly output
Research Interests
Higher education and academia
Public administration, public policy and public management research
Research-oriented blog posts
Stuff about research methods
Research trajectory
Publications
Developing a Writing Practice
Outlining Papers
Publishing strategies
Writing a book manuscript
Writing a research paper, book chapter or dissertation/thesis chapter
Everything Notebook
Literature Reviews
Note-Taking Techniques
Organization and Time Management
Planning Methods and Approaches
Qualitative Methods, Qualitative Research, Qualitative Analysis
Reading Notes of Books
Reading Strategies
Teaching Public Policy, Public Administration and Public Management
My Reading Notes of Books on How to Write a Doctoral Dissertation/How to Conduct PhD Research
Writing a Thesis (Undergraduate or Masters) or a Dissertation (PhD)
Reading strategies for undergraduates
Social Media in Academia
Resources for Job Seekers in the Academic Market
Writing Groups and Retreats
Regional Development (Fall 2015)
State and Local Government (Fall 2015)
Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2016)
Regional Development (Fall 2016)
Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2018)
Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2019)
Public Policy Analysis (Spring 2016)
POLI 351 Environmental Policy and Politics (Summer Session 2011)
POLI 352 Comparative Politics of Public Policy (Term 2)
POLI 375A Global Environmental Politics (Term 2)
POLI 350A Public Policy (Term 2)
POLI 351 Environmental Policy and Politics (Term 1)
POLI 332 Latin American Environmental Politics (Term 2, Spring 2012)
POLI 350A Public Policy (Term 1, Sep-Dec 2011)
POLI 375A Global Environmental Politics (Term 1, Sep-Dec 2011)

Writing theoretical frameworks, analytical frameworks and conceptual frameworks

Three of the most challenging concepts for me to explain are the interrelated ideas of a theoretical framework, a conceptual framework, and an analytical framework. All three of these tend to be used interchangeably. While I find these concepts somewhat fuzzy and I struggle sometimes to explain the differences between them and clarify their usage for my students (and clearly I am not alone in this challenge), this blog post is an attempt to help discern these analytical categories more clearly.

A lot of people (my own students included) have asked me if the theoretical framework is their literature review. That’s actually not the case. A theoretical framework , the way I define it, is comprised of the different theories and theoretical constructs that help explain a phenomenon. A theoretical framework sets out the various expectations that a theory posits and how they would apply to a specific case under analysis, and how one would use theory to explain a particular phenomenon. I like how theoretical frameworks are defined in this blog post . Dr. Cyrus Samii offers an explanation of what a good theoretical framework does for students .

For example, you can use framing theory to help you explain how different actors perceive the world. Your theoretical framework may be based on theories of framing, but it can also include others. For example, in this paper, Zeitoun and Allan explain their theoretical framework, aptly named hydro-hegemony . In doing so, Zeitoun and Allan explain the role of each theoretical construct (Power, Hydro-Hegemony, Political Economy) and how they apply to transboundary water conflict. Another good example of a theoretical framework is that posited by Dr. Michael J. Bloomfield in his book Dirty Gold, as I mention in this tweet:

In Chapter 2, @mj_bloomfield nicely sets his theoretical framework borrowing from sociology, IR, and business-strategy scholarship pic.twitter.com/jTGF4PPymn — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) December 24, 2017

An analytical framework is, the way I see it, a model that helps explain how a certain type of analysis will be conducted. For example, in this paper, Franks and Cleaver develop an analytical framework that includes scholarship on poverty measurement to help us understand how water governance and poverty are interrelated . Other authors describe an analytical framework as a “conceptual framework that helps analyse particular phenomena”, as posited here , ungated version can be read here .

I think it’s easy to conflate analytical frameworks with theoretical and conceptual ones because of the way in which concepts, theories and ideas are harnessed to explain a phenomenon. But I believe the most important element of an analytical framework is instrumental : their purpose is to help undertake analyses. You use elements of an analytical framework to deconstruct a specific concept/set of concepts/phenomenon. For example, in this paper , Bodde et al develop an analytical framework to characterise sources of uncertainties in strategic environmental assessments.

A robust conceptual framework describes the different concepts one would need to know to understand a particular phenomenon, without pretending to create causal links across variables and outcomes. In my view, theoretical frameworks set expectations, because theories are constructs that help explain relationships between variables and specific outcomes and responses. Conceptual frameworks, the way I see them, are like lenses through which you can see a particular phenomenon.

A conceptual framework should serve to help illuminate and clarify fuzzy ideas, and fill lacunae. Viewed this way, a conceptual framework offers insight that would not be otherwise be gained without a more profound understanding of the concepts explained in the framework. For example, in this article, Beck offers social movement theory as a conceptual framework that can help understand terrorism . As I explained in my metaphor above, social movement theory is the lens through which you see terrorism, and you get a clearer understanding of how it operates precisely because you used this particular theory.

Dan Kaminsky offered a really interesting explanation connecting these topics to time, read his tweet below.

I think this maps to time. Theoretical frameworks talk about how we got here. Conceptual frameworks discuss what we have. Analytical frameworks discuss where we can go with this. See also legislative/executive/judicial. — Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) September 28, 2018

One of my CIDE students, Andres Ruiz, reminded me of this article on conceptual frameworks in the International Journal of Qualitative Methods. I’ll also be adding resources as I get them via Twitter or email. Hopefully this blog post will help clarify this idea!

You can share this blog post on the following social networks by clicking on their icon.

Posted in academia .

Tagged with analytical framework , conceptual framework , theoretical framework .

By Raul Pacheco-Vega – September 28, 2018

7 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post .

Thanks, this had some useful clarifications for me!

I GOT CONFUSED AGAIN!

No need to be confused!

Thanks for the Clarification, Dr Raul. My cluttered mind is largely cleared, now.

Thanks,very helpful

I too was/am confused but this helps 🙂

Thank you very much, Dr.

About Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD

Find me online.

My Research Output

Google Scholar Profile
Academia.Edu
ResearchGate

My Social Networks

Polycentricity Network

Follow me on Twitter:

Proudly powered by WordPress and Carrington .

Carrington Theme by Crowd Favorite

Tools and Resources
Customer Services
Original Language Spotlight
Alternative and Non-formal Education
Cognition, Emotion, and Learning
Curriculum and Pedagogy
Education and Society
Education, Change, and Development
Education, Cultures, and Ethnicities
Education, Gender, and Sexualities
Education, Health, and Social Services
Educational Administration and Leadership
Educational History
Educational Politics and Policy
Educational Purposes and Ideals
Educational Systems
Educational Theories and Philosophies
Globalization, Economics, and Education
Languages and Literacies
Professional Learning and Development
Research and Assessment Methods
Technology and Education
Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Article contents

Qualitative data analysis and the use of theory.

Carol Grbich Carol Grbich Flinders University
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.554
Published online: 23 May 2019

The role of theory in qualitative data analysis is continually shifting and offers researchers many choices. The dynamic and inclusive nature of qualitative research has encouraged the entry of a number of interested disciplines into the field. These discipline groups have introduced new theoretical practices that have influenced and diversified methodological approaches. To add to these, broader shifts in chronological theoretical orientations in qualitative research can be seen in the four waves of paradigmatic change; the first wave showed a developing concern with the limitations of researcher objectivity, and empirical observation of evidence based data, leading to the second wave with its focus on realities - mutually constructed by researcher and researched, participant subjectivity, and the remedying of societal inequalities and mal-distributed power. The third wave was prompted by the advent of Postmodernism and Post- structuralism with their emphasis on chaos, complexity, intertextuality and multiple realities; and most recently the fourth wave brought a focus on visual images, performance, both an active researcher and an interactive audience, and the crossing of the theoretical divide between social science and classical physics. The methods and methodological changes, which have evolved from these paradigm shifts, can be seen to have followed a similar pattern of change. The researcher now has multiple paradigms, co-methodologies, diverse methods and a variety of theoretical choices, to consider. This continuum of change has shifted the field of qualitative research dramatically from limited choices to multiple options, requiring clarification of researcher decisions and transparency of process. However, there still remains the difficult question of the role that theory will now play in such a high level of complex design and critical researcher reflexivity.

qualitative research
data analysis
methodologies

Theory and Qualitative Data Analysis

Researchers new to qualitative research, and particularly those coming from the quantitative tradition, have often expressed frustration at the need for what appears to be an additional and perhaps unnecessary process—that of the theoretical interpretation of their carefully designed, collected, and analyzed data. The justifications for this process have tended to fall into one of two areas: the need to lift data to a broader interpretation beyond the Monty Pythonesque “this is my theory and it’s my very own,” to illumination of findings from another perspective—by placing the data in its relevant discipline field for comparison with previous theoretical data interpretations, while possibly adding something original to the field.

“Theory” is broadly seen as a set of assumptions or propositions, developed from observation or investigation of perceived realties, that attempt to provide an explanation of relationships or phenomena. The framing of data via theoretical imposition can occur at different levels. At the lowest level, various concepts such as “role,” “power,” “socialization,” “evaluation,” or “learning styles” refer to limited aspects of social organization and are usually applied to a specific group of people.

At a more complex level, theories of the Middle Range, identified by Robert Merton to link theory and practice, are used to build theory from empirical data. These tend to be discipline specific and incorporate concepts plus variables such as “gender,” “race,” or “class.” Concepts and variables are then combined into meaningful statements, which can be applied to more diverse social groups. For example, in education an investigation of student performance could emphasize such concepts as “safety,” “zero bullying,” “communication,” and “tolerance,” with variables such as “race” and “gender” to lead to a statement that good microsystems and a focus on individual needs are necessary for optimal student performance.

The third and most complex level uses the established or grand theories such as those of Sigmund Freud’s stages of children’s development, Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, or Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems, which have been widely accepted as meaningful across a number of disciplines and provide abstract explanations of the uniformity of aspects of social organization, social behavior, and social change.

The trend in qualitative research regarding the application of chosen levels of theory has been generally either toward theory direction/verification or theory generation, although the two are often intertwined. In the first, a relevant existing theory is chosen early and acts as a point of critical comparison for the data to be collected. This approach requires the researcher to think theoretically as s/he designs the study, collects data, and collates it into analytical groupings. The danger of theory direction is that an over focus on a chosen theoretical orientation may limit what the researcher can access or “see” in the data, but on the upside, this approach can also enable the generation of new theoretical aspects, as it is rare that findings will fall precisely within the implications of existing statements. Theory generation is a much looser approach and involves either one or a range of relevant levels of theory being identified at any point in the research process, and from which, in conjunction with data findings, some new combination or distillation can enhance interpretation.

The question of whether a well-designed study should negate the need for theoretical interpretation has been minimally debated. Mehdi and Mansor ( 2010 ) identified three trends in the literature on this topic: that theory in qualitative research relates to integrated methodology and epistemology; that theory is a separate and additional element to any methodological underpinnings; and that theory has no solid relationship with qualitative research. No clear agreement on any of these is evident. Overall, there appears to be general acceptance that the process of using theory, albeit etically (imposed) or emically (integrated), enhances outcomes, and moves research away from being a-theoretical or unilluminated by other ideas. However, regarding praxis, a closer look at the issue of the use of theory and data may be in order. Theoretical interpretation, as currently practiced, has limits. To begin with, the playing field is not level. In the grounded theory tradition, Glaser and Strauss ( 1967 ) were initially clear that in order to prevent undue influence on design and interpretation, the researcher should avoid reviewing the literature on a topic until after some data collection and analysis had been undertaken. The presumption that most researchers would already be well versed in theory/ies and would have a broad spectrum to draw on in order to facilitate the constant comparative process from which data-based concepts could be generated was found to be incorrect. Glaser ( 1978 ) suggested this lack could be improved at the conceptual level via personal and professional reflexivity.

This issue became even more of a problem with the advent of practice-led disciplines such as education and health into the field of qualitative research. These groups had not been widely exposed to the theories of the traditional social sciences such as sociology, psychology, and philosophy, although in education they would have been familiar with John Dewey’s concept of “pragmatism” linking learning with hands-on activity, and were more used to developing and using models of practice for comparison with current realities. By the mid- 20th century , Education was more established in research and had moved toward the use of middle range theories and the late 20th-century grand theorists: Michel Foucault, with his emphasis on power and knowledge control, and Jurgen Habermas, with his focus on pragmatism, communication, and knowledge management.

In addition to addictive identification with particular levels of theory and discipline-preferred theories and methods, activity across qualitative research seems to fall between two extremes. At one end it involves separate processes of data collection and analysis before searching for a theoretical framework within which to discuss the findings—often choosing a framework that has gained traction in a specific discipline. This “best/most acceptable fit” approach often adds little to the relevant field beyond repetition and appears somewhat forced. At the other extreme there are those who weave methods, methodologies, data, and theory throughout the whole research process, actively critiquing and modifying it as they go, usually with the outcome of creating some new direction for both theory and practice. The majority of qualitative research practice, however, tends to fall somewhere between these two.

The final aspect of framing data lies in the impact of researchers themselves, and the early- 21st-century emphasis is on exposing relevant personal frames, particularly those of culture, gender, socioeconomic class, life experiences such as education, work, and socialization, and the researcher’s own values and beliefs. The twin purposes of this exposure are to create researcher awareness and encourage accountability for their impact on the data, as well as allowing the reader to assess the value of research outcomes in terms of potential researcher bias or prejudice. This critical reflexivity is supposed to be undertaken at all stages of the research but it is not always clear that it has occurred.

Paradigms: From Interactionism to Performativity

It appears that there are potentially five sources of theory: that which is generally available and can be sourced from different disciplines; that which is imbedded in the chosen paradigm/s; that which underpins particular methodologies; that which the researcher brings, and that which the researched incorporate within their stories. Of these, the paradigm/s chosen are probably the most influential in terms of researcher position and design. The variety of the sets of assumptions, beliefs, and researcher practices that comprise the theoretical paradigms, perspectives, or broad world views available to researchers, and within which they are expected to locate their individual position and their research approach, has shifted dramatically since the 1930s. The changes have been distinct and identifiable, with their roots located in the societal shifts prompted by political, social, and economic change.

The First Wave

The Positivist paradigm dominated research, largely unquestioned, prior to the early 20th century . It emphasized the distancing of the researcher from his/her subjects; researcher objectivity; a focus on objective, cause–effect, evidence-based data derived from empirical observation of external realities; experimental quantitative methods involving testing hypotheses; and the provision of finite answers and unassailable future predictions. From the 1930s, concerns about the limitations of findings and the veracity of research outcomes, together with improved communication and exposure to the worldviews of other cultures, led to the advent of the realist/post-positivist paradigm. Post-positivism, or critical realism, recognized that certainty in proving the truth of a hypothesis was unachievable and that outcomes were probably limited to falsification (Popper, 1963 ), that true objectivity was unattainable and that the researcher was most likely to impact on or to contaminate data, that both qualitative and quantitative approaches were valuable, and that methodological pluralism was desirable.

The Second Wave

Alongside the worldwide political shifts toward “people power” in the 1960s and 1970s, two other paradigms emerged. The first, the Interpretivist/Constructivist, focused on the social situations in which we as humans develop and how our construction of knowledge occurs through interactions with others in these contexts. This paradigm also emphasized the gaining of an understanding of the subjective views or experiences of the participants being researched, and recognized the impact of the researcher on researcher–researched mutually constructed realities. Here, theory generation is the preferred outcome to explain the what, how, and why of the findings. This usually involves the development of a conceptual model, forged from both the data gained and from the application/integration of relevant theory, to provide explanations for and interpretations of findings, together with a new perspective for the field/discipline.

The second paradigm, termed the Critical/Emancipatory, focused on locating, critiquing, and changing inequalities in society. The identification of the location of systemic power discrepancies or systematic power misuse in situations involving gender, sexuality, class, and race is expected to be followed by moves to right any oppression discovered. Here, the use of theory has been focused more on predetermined concept application for “fit.” This is because the very strong notion of problematic societal structures and power inappropriately wielded have been the dominant underpinnings.

In both the Interpretive and Critical paradigms, researcher position shifted from the elevated and distant position of positivism, to one of becoming equal with those being researched, and the notion of researcher framing emerged to cover this shift and help us—the readers—to “see” (and judge) the researcher and her/his processes of data management more clearly.

The Third Wave

In the 1980s, the next wave of paradigmatic options—postmodernism and poststructuralism—emerged. Postmodernism, with its overarching cultural implications, and poststructuralism, with its focus on language, severely challenged the construction, limitations, and claims to veracity of all knowledge and in particular the use of theory derived from siloed disciplines and confined research methods. Regardless of whether the postmodern/poststructural label is attached to grounded theory, ethnography, phenomenology, action, or evaluative designs, one general aspect that prevails is a focus on language. Language has become viewed as dubious, with notions of “slippage”—the multiple meanings of individual words, and “difference”—the difference and deferral of textual meaning (Derrida, 1970 , 1972 ), adding complexity. Double coding, irony, and juxtaposition are encouraged to further identify meaning, and to uncover aspects of social organization and behavior that have been previously marginalized or made invisible by existing discourses and discursive practices. Texts are seen as complex constructions, and intertextuality is favored, resulting in multiply constructed texts. The world is viewed as chaotic and unknowable; individuals are no longer seen as two dimensional—they are viewed as multifaceted with multiple realities. Complex “truths” are perceived as limited by time and context, requiring multiple data sets and many voices to illuminate them, and small-scale focused local research is seen as desirable. The role of researcher also changed: the politics of position and self-reflexivity dominate and the researcher needs to clearly expose past influences and formerly hidden aspects of his/her life. S/he inhabits the position of an offstage or decentered facilitator, presenting data for the reader to judge.

Theory is used mainly at the conceptual level with no particular approach being privileged. The researcher has become a “bricoleur” (Levi-Strauss, 1962 ) or handyman, using whatever methods or theories that are within reach, to adapt, craft, and meld technological skills with mythical intellectual reflection in order to create unique perspectives on the topic. Transitional interpretations dominate, awaiting further challenges and deconstruction by the next researcher in the field.

The need for multifaceted data sets in the 1990s led inevitably to a search for other research structures, and mixed and multiple methods have become topical. In crossing the divide between qualitative and quantitative approaches, the former initially developed its own sub-paradigms: pragmatist (complimentary communication and shared meanings) and transformative/emancipatory (inequalities in race, class, gender, and disability, to be righted). An increasing focus on multiple methods led to the advent of dialectics (multiple paradigm use) and critical realism (the acceptance of divergent results) (Shannon-Baker, 2016 ). The dilemmas of theory use raised by these changes include whether to segregate data sets and try to explain disparate outcomes in terms of diversity using different theories; whether to integrate them through a homogeneous “smoothing” process—one theory fits all, in order to promote a singular interpretation; or whether to let the strongest paradigm—in terms of data—dominate the theoretical findings.

The Fourth Wave

During the early 21st century , as the third wave was becoming firmly established, the Performative paradigm emerged. The incorporation of fine art–based courses into universities has challenged the prescribed rules of the doctoral thesis, initially resulting in a debate—with echoes of Glaser and Strauss—as to whether theory, if used initially, is too directive, thereby potentially contaminating the performance, or whether theory application should be an outcome to enhance performances, or even whether academic guidelines regarding theory use need to be changed to accommodate these disciplines (Bolt, 2004 ; Freeman, 2010 ; Riley & Hunter, 2009 ). Performativity is seen in terms of “effect,” a notion derived from John Austin’s ( 1962 ) assertion that words and speech utterances do not just act as descriptors of content, they have social force and impact on reality. Following this, a productive work is seen as capable of transforming reality (Bolt, 2016 ). The issue most heard here is the problem of how to judge this form of research when traditional guidelines of dependability, transformability, and trustworthiness appear to be irrelevant. Barbara Bolt suggests that drawing on Austin’s ( 1962 ) terms “locutionary” (semantic meaning), “illocutionary” (force), and “perlocutionary” (effect achieved on receivers), together with the mapping of these effects in material, effective, and discursive domains, may be useful, despite the fact that mapping transformation may be difficult to track in the short term.

During the second decade of the 21st century , however, discussions relating to the use of theory have increased dramatically in academic performative research and a variety of theoreticians are now cited apart from John Austin. These include Maurice Merleu-Ponty ( 1945 and the spatiality of lived events; Jacques Derrida ( 1982 ) on iterability, simultaneous sameness, and difference; Giles Deleuze and Felix Guatarri ( 1987 ) on rituals of material objects and transformative potential; Jean-Francois Lyotard ( 1988 ) on plurality of micro narratives, “affect,” and its silent disruption of discourse; and Bruno Latour ( 2005 ) with regard to actor network theory—where theory is used to engage with rather than to explain the world in a reflective political manner.

In performative doctoral theses, qualitative theory and methods are being creatively challenged. For example, from the discipline of theater and performance Lee Miller and Joanne/Bob Whalley ( 2010 ) disrupt the notion of usual spaces for sincere events by taking their six-hour-long performance Partly Cloudy, Chance of Rain , involving a public reaffirmation of their marriage vows, out of the usual habitats to a service station on a highway. The performance involves a choir, a band, a pianist, 20 performers dressed as brides and grooms, photographers, a TV crew, an Anglican priest, plus 50 guests. The theories applied to this event include an exploration of Marc Auge’s ( 1992 ) conception of the “non-place”; Mikhail Bakhtin’s ( 1992 ) concepts of “dialogism” (many voices) together with “heteroglossia” (juxtaposition of many voices in a dialogue); and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s ( 1953 ) discussion of the “duck rabbit”—once the rabbit is seen (participatory experience) the duck (audience) is always infected by its presence. This couple further challenged the guidelines of traditional doctoral theses by successfully negotiating two doctoral awards for a joint piece of research

A more formal example of a doctoral thesis (Reik, 2014 ) using traditional qualitative approaches has examined at school level the clash of paradigms of performative creative styles of teaching with the neoliberalist focus on testing, curriculum standardization, and student outcomes.

Leah Mercer ( 2012 ), an academic in performative studies, used the performative paradigm in her doctoral thesis to challenge and breach not only the methodological but also the theoretical silos of the quantitative–qualitative divide. The physics project is an original work using live performances of personal storytelling with video and web streaming to depict the memories, preoccupations, and the formative relationship of two women, an Australian and an American, living in contemporary mediatized society. Using scientific theory, Mercer explores personal identity by reframing the principles of contemporary physics (quantum mechanics and uncertainty principle) as aesthetic principles (uncertainty and light) with the physics of space (self), time (memory), light (inspiration), and complementarity (the reconciliation of opposites) to illuminate these experiences.

The performative paradigm has also shifted the focus on the reader, developed in postmodernism, to a broader group—an active audience. Multi-methods have been increased to include symbolic imagery, in particular visual images, as well as sound and live action. The researcher’s role here is often that of performer within a cultural frame, creating and investigating multiple realities and providing the link between the text/script and the audience/public. Theory is either minimized to the level of concepts or used to break through the silos of different disciplines to integrate and reconcile aspects from long-lasting theoretical divides.

In these chronological lines of paradigm shifts, changes in researcher position and changes in the application of theory can clearly be seen. The researcher has moved out of the shadows and into the mainstream; her/his role has shifted from an authoritarian collector and presenter of finite “truths” to a creator and often performer of multiple and disparate data images for the audience to respond to. Theory options have shifted from direction and generation within existing perspectives to creative amalgamations of concepts from disciplines previously rarely combined.

Methodologies: From Anthropology to Fine Arts

It would be a simple matter if all the researcher had to contend with was siting oneself in a particular paradigm/s. Unfortunately, not only have paradigms shifted in terms of researcher position and theoretical usage but so also have methodological choices and research design. One of the most popular methodologies, ethnography, with its roots in classical anthropology and its fieldwork-based observations of action and interaction in cultural contexts, can illustrate the process of methodological change following paradigm shift. If a researcher indicates that he/she has undertaken an ethnographic study, the reader will be most likely to query “which form?”: classical?, critical?, auto?, visual?, ethno drama?, cyber/net?, or performative? The following examples from this methodology should indicate how paradigm shifts have resulted in increasing complexity of design, methods, and interpretive options.

In c lassical ethnography the greatest borrowing is from traditional anthropology in terms of process and tools, and this can be seen with the inclusion of initial time spent in the setting to learn the language of the culture and to generally “bathe” oneself in the environment, often with minimal data collection. This process is supposed to help increase researcher understanding of the culture and minimize the problem of “othering” (treating as a different species/alien). Then a fairly lengthy amount of time is usually spent in the cultural setting either as an observer or as a participant observer to collect as much data as is relevant to answer the research question. This is followed by a return to post-check whether the findings previously gathered have stood the test of time. The analytical toolkit can involve domain analysis, freelists, pilesorts, triads and taxonomies, frame and social network, and event analysis. Truncated mini-ethnographies became more common as time became an issue, but these can still involve years of managing descriptive data, often collected by several participating researchers as seen in Douglas, Rasmussen, and Flanagan’s ( 1977 ) study of the culture of a nudist beach. Shorter versions undertaken by one researcher, for example Sohn ( 2015 ), have explored strategies of teacher and student learning in a science classroom. Theoretical interpretation can be by conceptual application for testing, such as Margaret Mead’s ( 1931 ) testing of the concept of “adolescence”—derived from American culture—in Samoan culture, or, more generally, by concept generation. The latter can be seen in David Rozenhan’s ( 1973 ) investigation of the experience of a group of researcher pseudo-patients admitted to hospitals for the mentally ill in the United States. The main concepts generated were labeling, powerlessness, and depersonalization.

De-colonial ethnography recognizes the “othering” frames of colonial and postcolonial research and takes a position that past colonial supremacy over Third World countries persists in political, economic, educational, and social constructions. Decolonizing requires a critical examination of language, attitudes, and research methods. Kakal Battacharya ( 2016 ) has exposed the micro-discourses of the continuing manifestation of colonial power in a parallel narrative written by a South Asian woman and a white American male. Concepts of colonialism and patriarchy, displayed through the discourses exposed, provide a theoretical critique.

Within critical ethnography , with its focus on power location and alleviation of oppression, Dale Spender ( 1980 ) used structured and timed observations of the styles, quality, and quantity of interaction between staff and students in a range of English classrooms. The theory-directive methodological frames of feminism and gender inequality were applied to identify and expose the lesser time and lesser quality of interaction that teachers had with female students in comparison with that assigned to male students. Widespread distribution of these results alerted education authorities and led to change, in some environments, toward introducing single-sex classrooms for certain topics. This was seen as progress toward alleviating oppressive behaviors. This approach has produced many excellent educational studies, including Peter Willis ( 1977 ) on the preparation of working-class kids for working-class jobs; Michele Fine ( 1991 ) on African American and Latino students who dropped out of a New York high school; Angela Valenzuela ( 1999 ) on emigrant and other under-achievers in American schools; Lisa Patel ( 2013 ) on inclusion and exclusion of immigrants into education; and Jean Anyon ( 1981 ) on social stratification of identical curriculum knowledge in different classrooms

A less concept-driven and more descriptive approach to critical ethnography was emphasized by Phil Carspecken’s hermeneutic approach ( 1996 ), which triggered a move toward data-generated theoretical concepts that could then be used to challenge mainstream theoretical positions.

Post-critical ethnography emphasizes power and ideology and the social practices that contribute to oppression, in particular objectivity, positionality, representation and reflexivity, and critical insufficiency or “antipower.”

Responsibility is shifted to the researcher for the world they create and critique when they interpret their research contexts (Noblit, Flores, & Murillo, 2004 ).

Autoethnography emerged from the postmodern paradigm, with its search for different “truths” and different relationships with readers, and prompted an emphasis on personal experience and documentation of the self in a particular cultural context (Ellis, 2004 ). In order to achieve this, the researcher has to inhabit the dual positions of being the focus of activities, feelings, and emotions experienced in the setting while at the same time being positioned distantly—observing and recording the behaviors of the self in that culture. Well-developed skills of critical reflexivity are required. The rejection of the power-laden discourses/grand theories of the past and the emphasis on transitional explanations has resulted in minimal theorizing and an emphasis on data display, the reader, and the reader’s response. Open presentations of data can be seen in the form of narrative storytelling, or re-presentations in the form of fiction, dramatic performances, and poetry. Carolyn Ellis ( 2004 ) has argued that “story is theory and theory is story” and our “making sense of stories” involves contributing to a broader understanding of human existence. Application/generation of concepts may also occur, and the term “Critical Autoethnography” has been used (Hughes & Pennington, 2017 ), particularly where experiences of race, class, or gender inequality are being experienced. Jennifer Potter ( 2015 ) used the concept “whiteness of silence” to introduce a critical race element into her autoethnographic experience of black–white racial hatred experiences within a university class on African American communication in which she was a student.

Visual ethnography uses a variety of tools, including photography, sketches, movies, social media, the Web and virtual reality, body art, clothing, painting, and sculpture, to demonstrate and track culture. This approach has been available for some time both as a methodology in its own right and as a method of data collection. An example of this approach, which mixes classical and visual ethnography, is Philippe Bourgois and Jeff Schonberg’s 12-year study of two dozen homeless heroin injectors and crack smokers living under a freeway overpass in San Francisco ( 2009 ). Their data comprised extensive black and white photos, dialogue, taped conversations, and fieldwork observation notes. The themes of violence, race relations, family trauma, power relations, and suffering were theoretically interpreted through reworked notions of “power” that incorporated Pierre Bourdieu’s ( 1977 , 1999 ) concepts of “symbolic violence”—linking observed practices to social domination, and “habitus”—an individual’s personal disposition comprising unique feelings and actions grounded in biography and history; Karl Marx’s “lumpen” from “lumpenproletariat” ( 1848 ), the residual class—the vagrants and beggars together with criminal elements that lie beneath the labor force; and Michel Foucault’s “biopower” ( 1978 , 2008 )—the techniques of subjugation used by the state on the population, and “governmentality” ( 1991 )—where individuals are disciplined through institutions and the “knowledge–power” nexus. The ideas of these three theorists were used to create and weave a theory of “lumpen abuse” to interpret the lives of the participants.

Ethno Drama involves transforming the results from an ethnographic study into a performance to be shared, for example the educational experiences of children and youth (Gabriel & Lester, 2013 ). The performance medium can vary from a film (Woo, 2008 ), an article presented in dramatic form (Carter, 2014 ), or more usually a play script to be staged for an audience in a theater (Ethno Theater). One of the main purposes is to provide a hearing space for voices that have been marginalized or previously silenced. These voices and their contexts can be presented by research participants, actors, or the research team, and are often directed at professionals from the field. Audience-based meetings to devise recommendations for further action may follow a performance. Because of the focus on inequality, critical theory has been the major theoretical orientation for this approach. The structure of the presentation invites audiences to identify situations of oppression, in the hope that this will inform them sufficiently to enable modification of their own practices or to be part of the development of recommendations for future change.

Lesnick and Humphrie ( 2018 ) explored the views of identity of LGBTQ+ youth between 14 and 24 years of age via interviews and online questionnaires, the transcriptions of which were woven into a script that was performed by actors presenting stories not congruent with their own racial/gender scripts in order to challenge audience expectations and labels. The research group encouraged the schools where they performed to structure discussion groups to follow the school-located performances. The scripts and discussions revealed and were lightly interpreted through concepts of homelessness, racism, and “oppression Olympics”—the way oppressed people sometimes view one another in competition rather than in solidarity. These issues were found to be relevant to both school and online communities. Support for these young people was discovered to be mostly from virtual sources, being provided by dialogues within Facebook groups.

Cyber/net or/virtual ethnographies involve the study of online communities within particular cultures. Problems which have emerged from the practice of this approach include; discovery of the researcher lurking without permission on sites, gaining prior permission which often disturbs the threads of interaction, gaining permission post–data collection but having many furious people decline participation, the “facelessness” of individuals who may have uncheckable multiple personas, and trying to make sense of very disparate data in incomplete and non-chronological order.. There has been acceptance that online and offline situations can influence each other. Dibbell ( 1993 ) demonstrated that online sexual violence toward another user’s avatar in a text-based “living room” reduced the violated person to tears as she posted pleas for the violator to be removed from the site. Theoretical interpretation at the conceptual level is common; Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopia ( 1967 , 1984 ) was used to explain such spatio-temporal prisons as online rooms. Heterotropic spaces are seen as having the capacity to reflect and distort real and imagined experiences.

Poststructural ethnography tracks the instability of concepts both culturally and linguistically. This can be demonstrated in the deconstruction of language in education (Lather, 2001 ), particularly the contradictions and paradoxes of sexism, gender, and racism both in texts and in the classroom. These discourses are implicated in relations of power that are dynamic and within which resistance can be observed. Poststructuralism accepts that texts are multiple, as are the personas of those who created them, and that talk such as that which occurs in a classroom can be linked with knowledge control. Walter Humes ( 2000 ) discovered that the educational management discourses of “community,” “leadership,” and “participation” could be disguised by such terms as “learning communities” and “transformational leadership.” He analyzed the results with a conceptual framework derived from management theory and policy studies and linked the findings with political power.

Performative ethnography , from the post-postmodern paradigm, integrates the performances of art and theater with the focus on culture of ethnography (Denzin, 2003 ). A collaborative performance ethnography (van Katwyk & Seko, 2017 ) used a poem re-presenting themes from a previous research study on youth self-harming to form the basis of the creation of a performative dance piece. This process enabled the researcher participants to explore less dominant ways of knowing through co-learning and through the discovery of self-vulnerability. The research was driven by a social justice-derived concern that Foucault’s notion of “sovereignty” was being implemented through a web of relations that commodified and limited knowledge, and sanctioned the exploitation of individuals and communities.

This exploration of the diversity in ethnographic methods, methodologies, and interpretive strategies would be repeated in a similar trek through the interpretive, critical, postmodern, and post-postmodern approaches currently available for undertaking the various versions of grounded theory, phenomenology, feminist research, evaluation, action, or performative research.

Implications of Changes for the Researcher

The onus is now less on finding the “right” (or most familiar in a field) research approaches and following them meticulously, and much more on researchers making their own individual decisions as to which aspects of which methodologies, methods and theoretical explanations will best answer their research question. Ideally this should not be constrained by the state of the discipline they are part of; it should be equally as easy for a fine arts researcher to carry out a classical ethnography with a detailed theoretical interpretation derived from a grand theorist/s as it would be for a researcher in law to undertake a performative study with the minimum of conceptual insights and the maximum of visual and theoretical performances. Unfortunately, the reality is that trends within disciplines dictate publication access, thereby reinforcing the prevailing boundaries of knowledge.

However, the current diversity of choice has indeed shifted the field of qualitative research dramatically away from the position it was in several decades ago. The moves toward visual and performative displays may challenge certain disciplines but these approaches have now become well entrenched in others, and in qualitative research publishing. The creativity of the performative paradigm in daring to scale the siloed and well-protected boundaries of science in order to combine theoretical physics with the theories of social science, and to re-present data in a variety of newer ways from fiction to poetry to researcher performances, is exciting.

Given that theoretical as well as methodological and methods’ domains are now wide open to researchers to pick and choose from, two important aspects—justification and transparency of process—have become essential elements in the process of convincing the reader.

Justification incorporates the why of decision-making. Why was the research question chosen? Why was the particular paradigm, or paradigms, chosen best for the question? Why were the methodology and methods chosen most appropriate for both the paradigm/s and research question/s? And why were the concepts used the most appropriate and illuminating for the study?

Transparency of process not only requires that the researcher clarifies who they are in the field with relation to the research question and the participants chosen, but demands an assessment of what impact their background and personal and professional frames have had on research decisions at all stages from topic choice to theoretical analysis. Problems faced in the research process and how they were managed or overcome also requires exposition as does the chronology of decisions made and changed at all points of the research process.

Now to the issue of theory and the question of “where to?” This brief walk through the paradigmatic, methodological, and theoretical changes has demonstrated a significant move from the use of confined paradigms with limited methodological options to the availability of multiple paradigms, co-methodologies, and methods of many shades, for the researcher to select among Regarding theory use, there has been a clear move away from grand and middle range theories toward the application of individual concepts drawn from a variety of established and minor theoreticians and disciplines, which can be amalgamated into transitory explanations. The examples of theoretical interpretation presented in this article, in my view, very considerably extend, frame, and often shed new light on the themes that have been drawn out via analytical processes. Well-argued theory at any level is a great enhancer, lifting data to heights of illumination and comparison, but it could equally be argued that in the presence of critical researcher reflexivity, complex, layered, longitudinal, and well-justified design, meticulous analysis, and monitored audience response, it may no longer be essential.

Bibliography

Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and method ( J. Weinheimer & D. Marshall , Trans.). NY: Crossroad.
Grbich, C. (2004). New approaches in social Research . London, U.K.: SAGE.
Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction . London, U.K.: SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. , & Denzin, N. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies: Contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln , Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lyotard, J. (1983). Answering the question: What is post modernism? In E. Hassan & S. Hassan (Eds.), Innovation and renovation . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Riley, S. , & Hunter, L. (Eds.). (2009). Mapping landscapes for performance as research . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tinkler, P. (2011). Using photography in social and historic research . New Dehli, India: SAGE.
Vis, F. , & Thelwall, M. (2012). Researching social media . New Dehli, India: SAGE.
Von Hantelmann, D. (2010). How to do things with art . Zurich, Switzerland: JRP Ringier.
Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge . Curriculum Inquiry , 11 (1), 3–42.
Auge, M. (1992). Non-Places: An introduction to supermodernity ( John Howe ). London, U.K.: Verso.
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: An introduction to anthropology of supermodernity . London, U.K.: Verso.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words [The William James Lectures, 1955]. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1992). The dialogic imagination: Four essays . Austin: University of Texas Press.
Battacharya, K. , & Gillen, N. (2016). Power, race and higher education: A cross-cultural parallel narrative . Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image . London, U.K.: I.B Tauris.
Bolt, B. (2016). Artistic research: A performative paradigm? Parse. #3 Repetitions and Reneges . Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1999) The Weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society . Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Bourgois, P. , & Schonberg, J. (2009). Righteous dopefiend: Homelessness, addiction, and poverty in urban America . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research . New York: Routledge.
Carter, M. (2014). The teacher monologues: Exploring the identities and experiences of artist-teachers . Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia ( B. Massumi , Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Denzin, N. (2003). Performance ethnography : Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Derrida, J. (1970). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of human sciences lecture presented at johns hopkins university , October 21, 1966.
Derrida, J. (1972). Margins of philosophy: Plato to footnotes ( A. Bass , Trans.). Sussex, U.K.: Brighton and Harvester Press.
Derrida, J. (1982). Sending: On representation . Social Research , 49 (2), 294–326.
Dewey, J. (1998). The essential Dewey ( L. Hickman & T. Alexander , Eds.). (2 vols.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Dibbell, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace from chapter 1 of My Tiny Life . Published in The Village Voice .
Douglas, J. , Rasmussen, P. , & Fanagan, C. (1977). The nude beach . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography . Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school . New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Foucault, M. (1967, 1984). Des espaces autres (J. Miscowiec, Trans.). [ Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotropias]. Archtecture/Mouvement/Continuite , October.
Foucault, M. (1978). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978 ( A. Davidson , Ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (1991). Studies in governmentality: Two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault ( G. Burchell , C. Gordon , & and P. Miller , Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics . Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979 ( M. Senellart , Ed, Trans.; G. Burchell , Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. (First published as Naissance de la Biopolitique 2004).
Freeman, J. (2010). Blood, sweat and theory: Research through practice in performance . Faringdon, U.K.: Libri.
Freud, S. (1953–1974). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud ( J. Strachey , Trans. and Ed.) (24 Vols). London, U.K.: Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Gabriel, R. , & Lester, J. (2013). Performances of research: Critical issues in K–12 education . New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the theory of grounded theory . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research . London: Aldine.
Hughes, S. , & Pennington, J. (2017). Autoethnography: Process, product and possibility for critical social research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Humes, W. (2000). The discourses of educational management . Journal of Educational Enquiry , 1 (1).
Lather, P. (2001). Postmodernism, post-structuralism and post(critical) ethnography: Of ruins, aporias and angels. In P. Atkinson , A. Coffey , S. Delamont , J. Lofland , & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network theory . Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Lesnick, E. , & Humphrie, J. (2018). Amplifying youth voices through ethnodrama research . Washington, DC: National Association of Independent Schools.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind ( La pensee sauvage) ( G. Weidenfield & Nicholson Ltd. , Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lyotard, J. (1988). Peregrinations: Law, form, event . The Wellek Library lectures at the University of California, Irvine. New York, NY.: Columbia University Press.
Marx, K. , & Engels, F. (1848). The Communist Manifesto ( S. Moore , Trans.).
Mead, M. (1931). The life of a Samoan girl: ALL TRUE. The record of actual adventures that have happened to ten women of today . New York, NY.: Brewer, Warren and Putnam.
Mehdi, T. , & Mansor, A. (2010). A General perspective on the role of theory in qualitative research . Journal of International Social Research , 3 (11).
Mercer, L. (2012). The Physics Project. In L. Mercer , J. Robson , & D. Fenton (Eds.), Live research: Methods of practice led inquiry in research . Nerang: Queensland, Ladyfinger.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception . Paris, France: Editions Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception ( D. Landes , Trans.). London, U.K.: Routledge.
Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure . New York, NY: Free Press.
Miller, L. , & Whalley, J. (2010). Case Study 11: Partly cloudy, chance of rain. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Blood, sweat and theory: Research through practice in performance . Faringdon, U.K.: Libri.
Noblit, G. , Flores, S. , & Nurillo, E. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique . New York: Hampton Press.
Patel, L. (2013). Youth held at the border: Immigration, education and the politics of inclusion . New York, NY: Columbia University Teacher’s College Press.
Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child . London, U.K.: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1963). Science: Conjectures and refutations. Online lecture transcript .
Potter, J. (2015). The whiteness of silence: A critical autoethnographic tale of a strategic rhetoric . Qualitative Report , 20 (9), 7.
Reik, R. (2014). Arts education in a culture of performativity: A case study of what is valued in one Queensland school community . (Doctoral dissertation), Griffith University, Brisbane.
Riley, S. R. , & Hunter, L. (Eds.). (2009). Mapping landscapes for performance as research . London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenhan, D. (1973). On being sane in insane places . Science , 17 (January), 250–258.
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research . Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 10 (4).
Sohn, L. (2015). Ethnographic case study of a high school science classroom: Strategies in STEM education . (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Spender, D. (1980). Talking in class. In D. Spender & E. Sarah (Eds.), Leaming to lose: Sexism and education . London, U.K.: Women’s Press.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.–Mexican youth and the politics of caring . Albany: SUNY.
van Katwyk, T. , & Seko, Y. (2017). Knowing through improvisational dance: A collaborative autoethnography . Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 18 (2), 1.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations ( G. Anscombe , Trans.). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Woo, Y. (2008). Engaging new audiences: Translating research into popular media. Educational Researcher , 37 (6), 321–329.

Autoethnography
Risky Truth-Making in Qualitative Inquiry
Ethnography and Education
Qualitative Design Research Methods
Qualitative Approaches to Studying Marginalized Communities
Arts Education Research
Poststructural Temporalities in School Ethnography
Détournement as a Qualitative Method
Ethnographies of Education and Anthropological Knowledge Production
Network Ethnography as an Approach for the Study of New Governance Structures in Education
Black Feminist Thought and Qualitative Research in Education
Poetic Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis
Performance-Based Ethnography
Complexity Theory as a Guide to Qualitative Methodology in Teacher Education
Observing Schools and Classrooms

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Education. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 29 March 2024

Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy
Legal Notice
Accessibility
[66.249.64.20|195.158.225.230]
195.158.225.230

Character limit 500 /500

Log in using your username and password

Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
Latest content
Current issue
Write for Us
BMJ Journals More You are viewing from: Google Indexer

Roberta Heale 1 ,
Helen Noble 2
1 Laurentian University , School of Nursing , Sudbury , Ontario , Canada
2 Queens University Belfast , School of Nursing and Midwifery , Belfast , UK
Correspondence to Dr Roberta Heale, School of Nursing, Laurentian University, Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, P3E2C6, Canada; rheale{at}laurentian.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103077

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Often the most difficult part of a research study is preparing the proposal based around a theoretical or philosophical framework. Graduate students ‘…express confusion, a lack of knowledge, and frustration with the challenge of choosing a theoretical framework and understanding how to apply it’. 1 However, the importance in understanding and applying a theoretical framework in research cannot be overestimated.

The choice of a theoretical framework for a research study is often a reflection of the researcher’s ontological (nature of being) and epistemological (theory of knowledge) perspective. We will not delve into these concepts, or personal philosophy in this article. Rather we will focus on how a theoretical framework can be integrated into research.

The theoretical framework is a blueprint for your research project 1 and serves several purposes. It informs the problem you have identified, the purpose and significance of your research demonstrating how your research fits with what is already known (relationship to existing theory and research). This provides a basis for your research questions, the literature review and the methodology and analysis that you choose. 1 Evidence of your chosen theoretical framework should be visible in every aspect of your research and should demonstrate the contribution of this research to knowledge. 2

What is a theory?

A theory is an explanation of a concept or an abstract idea of a phenomenon. An example of a theory is Bandura’s middle range theory of self-efficacy, 3 or the level of confidence one has in achieving a goal. Self-efficacy determines the coping behaviours that a person will exhibit when facing obstacles. Those who have high self-efficacy are likely to apply adequate effort leading to successful outcomes, while those with low self-efficacy are more likely to give up earlier and ultimately fail. Any research that is exploring concepts related to self-efficacy or the ability to manage difficult life situations might apply Bandura’s theoretical framework to their study.

Using a theoretical framework in a research study

Example 1: the big five theoretical framework.

The first example includes research which integrates the ‘Big Five’, a theoretical framework that includes concepts related to teamwork. These include team leadership, mutual performance monitoring, backup behaviour, adaptability and team orientation. 4 In order to conduct research incorporating a theoretical framework, the concepts need to be defined according to a frame of reference. This provides a means to understand the theoretical framework as it relates to a specific context and provides a mechanism for measurement of the concepts.

In this example, the concepts of the Big Five were given a conceptual definition, that provided a broad meaning and then an operational definition, which was more concrete. 4 From here, a survey was developed that reflected the operational definitions related to teamwork in nursing: the Nursing Teamwork Survey (NTS). 5 In this case, the concepts used in the theoretical framework, the Big Five, were the used to develop a survey specific to teamwork in nursing.

The NTS was used in research of nurses at one hospital in northeastern Ontario. Survey questions were grouped into subscales for analysis, that reflected the concepts of the Big Five. 6 For example, one finding of this study was that the nurses from the surgical unit rated the items in the subscale of ’team leadership' (one of the concepts in the Big Five) significantly lower than in the other units. The researchers looked back to the definition of this concept in the Big Five in their interpretation of the findings. Since the definition included a person(s) who has the leadership skills to facilitate teamwork among the nurses on the unit, the conclusion in this study was that the surgical unit lacked a mentor, or facilitator for teamwork. In this way, the theory of teamwork was presented through a set of concepts in a theoretical framework. The Theoretical Framework (TF)was the foundation for development of a survey related to a specific context, used to measure each of the concepts within the TF. Then, the analysis and results circled back to the concepts within the TF and provided a guide for the discussion and conclusions arising from the research.

Example 2: the Health Decisions Model

In another study which explored adherence to intravenous chemotherapy in African-American and Caucasian Women with early stage breast cancer, an adapted version of the Health Decisions Model (HDM) was used as the theoretical basis for the study. 7 The HDM, a revised version of the Health Belief Model, incorporates some aspects of the Health Belief Model and factors relating to patient preferences. 8 The HDM consists of six interrelated constituents that might predict how well a person adheres to a health decision. These include sociodemographic, social interaction, experience, knowledge, general and specific health beliefs and patient preferences, and are clearly defined. The HDM model was used to explore factors which might influence adherence to chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Sociodemographic, social interaction, knowledge, personal experience and specific health beliefs were used as predictors of adherence to chemotherapy.

The findings were reported using the theoretical framework to discuss results. The study found that delay to treatment, health insurance, depression and symptom severity were predictors to starting chemotherapy which could potentially be adapted with clinical interventions. The findings from the study contribute to the existing body of literature related to cancer nursing.

Example 3: the nursing role effectiveness model

In this final example, research was conducted to determine the nursing processes that were associated with unexpected intensive care unit admissions. 9 The framework was the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model. In this theoretical framework, the concepts within Donabedian’s Quality Framework of Structure, Process and Outcome were each defined according to nursing practice. 10 11 Processes defined in the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model were used to identify the nursing process variables that were measured in the study.

A theoretical framework should be logically presented and represent the concepts, variables and relationships related to your research study, in order to clearly identify what will be examined, described or measured. It involves reading the literature and identifying a research question(s) while clearly defining and identifying the existing relationship between concepts and theories (related to your research questions[s] in the literature). You must then identify what you will examine or explore in relation to the concepts of the theoretical framework. Once you present your findings using the theoretical framework you will be able to articulate how your study relates to and may potentially advance your chosen theory and add to knowledge.

Kalisch BJ ,
Parent M , et al
Strickland OL ,
Dalton JA , et al
Eraker SA ,
Kirscht JP ,
Lightfoot N , et al
Harrison MB ,
Laschinger H , et al

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Patient and public involvement Not required.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

blog @ precision

Choosing a theoretical framework: popular theories for dissertation research.

One of the most important steps in topic development for your dissertation is picking out a theory or theories that will help to create the theoretical framework for your study. Because this is such a crucial and yet tricky task, our quantitative and qualitative research methods experts often help with this step when collaborating with our dissertation consulting clients on developing their research topics. Maybe you’re reading this and thinking, “What exactly IS a theoretical framework, anyway?” If so, you might check out this previous blog post on this topic, as it addresses this foundational question in more depth.

Whether you are using your framework to develop a qualitative research interview protocol or to frame a study using statistical analysis of pertinent variables, the theoretical lens for your dissertation needs to be chosen carefully. This is because it has to provide a suitable explanatory structure, connecting the problem , purpose, research questions, and data collection instruments. Making a poor choice of theory for this purpose can result in having to do major rewrites to your proposal down the road (shudder!), so it’s best to choose mindfully. Keep in mind that we can definitely help with this crucial early decision in your dissertation or thesis writing process.

To help you start thinking over this decision for your dissertation, this article will provide a handful of possibilities for your theoretical framework. We compiled this list of popular theories based on our dissertation assistance clients’ choices, although this is by no means an exhaustive list. But, this should at least get you started thinking about some possibilities.

Self-Determination Theory

Deci and Ryan’s (2000) self-determination theory is a very common choice for the theoretical framework among our dissertation assistance clients. Central to self-determination theory is the proposition that our motivation stems from satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2008). Competence refers to our sense that we are capable of accomplishing specific tasks, and autonomy is the feeling that we have control and choice. Our sense of relatedness refers to the perception that we have meaningful social relationships.

Many of our dissertation consulting clients are interested in examining intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, which develop in relation to different experiences of need satisfaction. When we feel intrinsic motivation, we have a sense of pleasure, interest in, and enjoyment of the activity. The experience of greater needs satisfaction related to certain environments or activities helps to develop intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2008). On the other hand, extrinsic motivation comes about when we receive outside incentives to engage in certain actions.

Because self-determination theory deals with basic psychological needs, we find when working with our dissertation consulting clients that it is widely applicable across many different topics in the social sciences. Self-determination theory can help to explain different forms of motivation, which makes it useful in dissertations that focus centrally on how motivation is shaped in arenas such as school or the workplace. Furthermore, the experience of self-determination has been associated with a variety of physical and psychological health outcomes, which makes it a great choice for examinations of conditions that influence health. Our dissertation assistance clients have used self-determination theory to frame studies on diverse topics ranging from a statistical analysis of predictors of motivation among call center workers to a qualitative research exploration of conditions perceived to influence psychological well being in congregate care facilities.

Social Cognitive Theory

Another very popular theory among our dissertation assistance clients is Bandura’s (1977) social cognitive theory. The theory can help with explaining how behaviors develop, and one of the key tenets of social cognitive theory is that we learn behaviors through our observations of other people. This is not to say that we imitate every single behavior we observe indiscriminately, though. We are more or less likely to replicate behavior we observe based on whom we see doing it—or in other words, who the “model” is.

Our dissertation consulting clients who are interested in how powerful people exert influence often love this theory, as Bandura (1977) posited that we are much more likely to imitate behavior when we observe others who are perceived as having elevated power or status modeling the behavior. This is especially so in the case of vicarious reinforcement, which is when the model is rewarded in some way for the behavior. If we see that certain behaviors elicit negative outcomes, however, we might avoid those behaviors due to the expectation that we would also be penalized for them. Our observations of others’ experiences, along with the results of our own behavior, also influence self-efficacy, which is a person’s sense of capability to handle challenges effectively.

Social cognitive theory is a really useful framework when you’re interested in examining how people develop behavioral patterns or ways of thinking about their own competence. Our dissertation consulting clients have used social cognitive theory to frame qualitative analysis of influences on aggressive behavior in youths, statistical analysis of the predictors of self-efficacy in novice teachers, and qualitative research exploring the influence of social relationships on health behaviors.

Ecological Systems Theory

Bronfenbrenner’s (1977) ecological systems theory is another very popular theory among our dissertation consulting clients. According to the theory, a variety of influences help to shape children’s growth and development over time. As children interact with their environments, they are exposed to a variety of influences that Bronfenbrenner conceptualized as nested spheres that radiate outward from proximal to distal. For example, the most immediate and influential social circle (i.e., family) is referred to as the microsystem. The mesosystem is a bit more removed from the child’s immediate network and may include influences such as friends and teachers. Beyond the mesosystem is the exosystem, which includes influences such as the media, government systems, and extended family. The macrosystem is even more distal and includes influences such as cultural narratives and societal ideals.

Ecological systems theory is a favorite among our dissertation assistance clients who are studying education or human development, as it applies to so many important aspects of growth and development for children and youths. It lends itself well to qualitative research explorations of student, parent, or educator perceptions on child development as well as to statistical analysis of the impact of variables (e.g., parent involvement, teacher efficacy) that can be located in one or another of the levels of influence in Bronfenbrenner’s model.

Tinto’s Theory of Student Persistence

Tinto’s theory of student persistence and retention is very much appreciated by our dissertation consulting clients studying higher education. In this theory, Tinto (1993) proposed that students have a collection of personal characteristics that exert influence over their commitment to their higher education institutions. Some of these factors reside at the individual level, such as gender, race, and age. Background factors like socioeconomic level and previous achievement in academics can also come into play.

Beyond these factors, Tinto (1993) posited that the degree to which the student feels a sense of social and academic integration can affect their sense of commitment to the college or university. This means that feeling a greater sense of social and academic integration can help to support academic persistence, thus resulting in higher retention rates (Tinto, 1993). Among our dissertation assistance clients conducting research in higher education leadership, Tinto’s theory is a top choice. Validated survey instruments derived from this theory make it a useful choice for quantitative studies involving statistical analysis of factors related to persistence and retention. And, it makes a great lens through which to explore student perspectives on their experiences of integration and persistence using a qualitative research and analysis approach.

Adult Learning Theory

Another favorite of our dissertation assistance clients in higher education is adult learning theory. In his theory, Knowles (1973) proposed that adults learn differently from children, which means that educators can help to enhance adults’ learning if they take their specific needs into account. There are six key dimensions to adult learning (Knowles, 1973):

Self-concept: Adults are self-directed and independent, and so they will learn best when learning conditions allow them autonomy.
Experience: Adults have plenty of life experience, and tying new concepts or facts in with their own experiences enhances their learning.
Readiness to learn: Adults experience a greater readiness or motivation to learn new information when they see a true need for learning the information.
Orientation to learning: Using a task- or problem-focused approach optimizes learning of new information by adults.
Internal motivation: Adults are driven by intrinsic rather than extrinsic motivators when learning new information.
Need to know: It helps adults to learn when new information is clearly relevant to or applicable in their lives.

One of the great things about this theory is its broad application—it applies to adult learning across many contexts. This makes it a popular theory among our dissertation consulting clients conducting research in a variety of fields. For example, the theory might frame a qualitative research exploration of adult learning in traditional university settings while also serving quite well as the guiding framework in a statistical analysis of factors associated with learning a new enterprise resource planning system in the workplace.

Transformative Learning Theory

Another theory of adult learning is Mezirow’s (2009) transformative learning theory. This theory is popular among our dissertation assistance clients who are examining processes of learning that significantly change an adult’s foundational beliefs and assumptions. Mezirow (2009) posited that certain types of learning experiences help induce important shifts to an adult’s basic beliefs systems. Transformative learning, then, describes the processes that change the ways that an adult thinks about and interacts with the world around them. Specifically, discussion with others and self-reflection are key processes that can transform an adult’s values, beliefs, and behavior in significant ways.

Transformative learning may happen spontaneously or as the result of formal education or training (Taylor, 2007). This makes the theory applicable when investigating such learning as the result of classroom or workplace instruction, but it also can help to frame inquiry into transformation as the result of personal experiences or everyday events. For example, our dissertation assistance clients have used the theory as lens for qualitative analysis of trauma as transformative of individuals’ spiritual beliefs, and they have also used it to frame statistical analysis in quasi-experimental investigations of educational interventions aimed at developing cultural sensitivity in adult learners.

Transformational Leadership Theory

Among our dissertation consulting clients who wish to take a statistical analysis approach to the study of leadership, one of the most widely used leadership theories for frameworks is transformational leadership theory. The roots of this theory lie in the work of Burns (1978), who conceptualized transforming leadership as an approach that inspired employee performance through appeals to their values and morality. Bass (1985) elaborated upon Burns’ theory through development of dimensions that reflect underlying psychological processes at work within the relationships between transformational leaders and employees. These four dimensions of transformational leadership are (a) intellectual stimulation, (b) charisma or idealized influence, (c) inspirational motivation, and (d) individualized consideration (Avolio et al., 1999; Bass, 1991).

The associated Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) is a frequently used tool in the statistical analysis of workplace predictors or outcomes that are associated with transformational leadership. The MLQ is definitely a favorite among our dissertation assistance clients studying in fields such as business management and industrial/organizational psychology. However, the dimensions of transformational leadership often create intriguing lenses through which to explore workplace phenomena through a qualitative research perspective. An example is a qualitative analysis of employees’ perspectives on individualized consideration and its influence on their experiences of stress and coping on the job.

Job Demands-Resources Model

The job demands-resources model (JD-R) is a popular choice of framework for our dissertation assistance clients who are conducting quantitative or qualitative research on the workplace. According to this model, the overall balance between job demands and job resources has an effect on employees’ stress levels (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Job demands can be psychological or physical aspects of jobs that elevate a worker’s stress. These might include such factors as physical demands, emotional demands, work pressure, workload, role conflict, and role ambiguity.

On the other hand, job resources can function to relieve or lessen stress for workers. These resources can be physical, social, or organizational dimensions of a job that help to ease stress deriving from job demands (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Job resources can take many forms, such as workplace practices that support employees to perform their job tasks effectively, supportive relationships in the workplace, conditions that increase an employee’s sense of autonomy, and a strong organizational climate.

The availability of validated survey instruments for the JD-R model make it a great choice to frame statistical analysis of variables that are related to job demands and resources. For example, job demands and resources may derive from organizational features such as justice or culture, or they may be predictive of outcomes such as employee performance and well being. Exploring perceptions related to demands and resources on the job via qualitative research methods can also reveal important insights, and our dissertation consulting clients in fields like industrial/organizational psychology have used this model to frame such inquiry.

Diffusion of Innovations Theory

Diffusion of innovations is a theory that was developed by Rogers (2003), and it continues to occupy a very useful role as a theoretical framework for our dissertation consulting clients in fields from information technology to business management and leadership. This theory can help to frame studies that focus on how different types of innovations are embraced. A core underlying assumption of the theory is that information related to new innovations diffuses throughout communication channels in a social system over the course of time. Although we often think of technologies when we think of innovations, an innovation can really be any practice or idea that is viewed as novel or new by people and that induces a sense of uncertainty. This might include technologies, but it might also include things like new practices or policies within formal or informal organizations.

According to Rogers (2003), there are five factors that influence the rate of adoption of a new innovation: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. According to the theory, these five factors generally influence how quickly a new innovation is accepted and adopted. Additionally, though, different people tend to respond to innovations with varying degrees of acceptance, and their communication amongst one another may also influence how quickly any given group adopts a new innovation.

Rogers (2003) proposed distinct categories related to openness to innovations. Innovators are the most willing to adopt new innovations, followed by early adopters and then early majority. Those who are more reluctant generally to accept new innovations fall into the late majority and laggard categories. These are people who need a lot of help to accept new innovations, and they tend to do so only after the people surrounding them have successfully adopted the innovation.

Our dissertation assistance clients from a range of fields have applied this theory as their framework, as the nature of “innovation” is quite broad. For example, this theory made a great framework for a qualitative analysis of teachers’ perceptions of and reactions to the introduction of a new data-based decision making process. It applied equally well in a quantitative study that used statistical analysis to determine the factors that most strongly impacted customers’ behavioral reactions to online versus in-person car sales.

Finally, a big favorite among our dissertation assistance clients who are conducting research on technology adoption is the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). It was formulated by Venkatesh et al. (2003) using eight different models that addressed technology acceptance and adoption in different ways. The updated version of the theory, UTAUT2, still includes the dimensions from the first version of the theory (i.e., performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions), which are proposed as predictors of an individual’s behavioral intention and actual use of technology. To tailor UTAUT2 to the consumer population, the authors added dimensions of price value, hedonic motivation, and experience or habit (Venkatesh et al., 2012).

There are seven dimensions of UTAUT2 that correspond with expectations and perceptions related to the use of a specific technology (Venkatesh et al., 2012). These are:

performance expectancy, which refers to perceived benefits of technology use;
effort expectancy, which refers to expected ease or difficulty of technology use;
social influence, which refers to a person’s sense of how other people feel about their use of technology, especially valued others like friends or family;
facilitating conditions, which are resources a person views as available to support them in their use of the technology;
hedonic motivation, which refers to the sense of joy or pleasure a person derives from using technology;
experience/habit, which refers to the degree to which a person has already used technology; and
price value, which refers to the value a person expects to derive from use of the technology.

According to the UTAUT2 model, each of these dimensions exerts influence on a person’s behavioral intentions to use technology, which then influences the person’s actual use of the technology (Venkatesh et al., 2012).

Our dissertation consulting clients have made great use of the UTAUT2 survey to guide statistical analysis of technology acceptance and use variables across technologies that range from learning management systems to smart devices. Shaping qualitative research data collection around the various dimensions of UTAUT2 can also yield rich insights into the thinking and reasoning behind technology resistance or acceptance. A great example of this is a qualitative analysis that explored perceptions of social influence with regard to ride sharing services.

Because your guiding theory ties your whole study together within an explanatory framework, it is important to choose wisely as you develop this vital piece of your research topic. If you are choosing a quantitative method for your dissertation, many theories have associated survey instruments that can help to ensure that your data collection and statistical analysis align well with your framework. For qualitative research , it is important to develop data collection instruments (e.g., interview protocols) that align with key dimensions of the theoretical framework. If you would like help with these essential steps for creating alignment, our dissertation coaches are happy to provide guidance during your topic development process. There are so many theories to choose from—this article provided just a glimpse of your possibilities—and we’re here to help if you need us!

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 72 (4), 441-462. https://doi.org/10/1348/096317999166789

Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory . Prentice Hall.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations . Free Press.

Bass, B. M. (1991). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics , 18 (3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32 (7), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership . Harper and Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry , 11 (4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology , 49 (3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species . Gulf Publishing Company.

Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview of transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists…in their own words (pp. 90-105). Routledge.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5 th ed.). Free Press.

Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education , 26 (2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2 nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly , 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly , 36 (1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Analyzing Theories, Conceptual Frameworks, and Research Methods in EdD Dissertations

Original Paper
Published: 27 May 2022
Volume 66 , pages 721–728, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

Swapna Kumar ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-7593 1 ,
Kara Dawson 1 ,
Rhiannon Pollard 2 &
Gage Jeter 1

1351 Accesses

2 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Dissertation guiding principles and purposefully designed research curriculum guide the conceptualization and structure of dissertations in the EdD in Educational Technology at a large university in the US. An analysis of 69 dissertations completed by the first five cohorts over ten years was conducted to determine the theories, frameworks, and research designs used by professional students to conduct Educational Technology research in diverse contexts. The results indicated that students carefully assembled literature from various areas that reflect the diversity of disciplines and professional contexts in which dissertations were conducted, created and used conceptual frameworks that successfully provide a roadmap for research, adopted a variety of research approaches with mixed methods and qualitative approaches used more than quantitative approaches, and explicitly articulated processes for rigor and trustworthiness. Implications for program design and curriculum improvement are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework

Detlef Urhahne & Lisette Wijnia

Ethical Considerations of Conducting Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

Archbald, D. (2008). Research versus problem solving for the education leadership doctoral thesis: Implications for form and function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (5), 704–739

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher , 34 (6), 3–15

Bourner, T., Bowden, R., & Laing, S. (2001). Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070124819

Article Google Scholar

Dawson, K., & Kumar, S. (2014). An analysis of professional practice Ed.D. dissertations in educational technology. TechTrends, 58 (4), 62–72

Franke, A., & Arvidsson, B. (2011). Research supervisors’ different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903402151

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7–23

Gillham, J. C., Williams, N. V., Rife, G., & Parker, K. K. (2019). Problems of practice: A document analysis of education doctorate dissertations. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice , 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2019.85

Grulke, E. (2019). Investigating conceptions of mathematics and approaches to learning of first-year college students engaging in online discussions . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida.

Guskey, T. R. (1998). The age of our accountability: Evaluation must become an integral part of staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 19 (4), 36–44

Google Scholar

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10 (3), 2–10

Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels . Berrett-Koehler Publishers

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education . Jossey-Bass

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational researcher, 28 (2), 16–46

Kumar, S. (2014). A systematic approach to the assessment of impact in a professional doctorate. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 4 (2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2013-0020

Kumar, S., & Antonenko, P. (2014). Connecting practice, theory and method: Supporting professional doctoral students in developing conceptual frameworks. TechTrends, 58 (4), 54–61

Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Online mentoring and student support in online doctoral programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 31 (2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1300464

Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2018). An online doctorate for researching professionals: Program design, implementation and evaluation. Athabasca University Press. http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120272

Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the community of inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12 (6), 126–142. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/978

Kumar, S., & Ochoa, M. N. (2012). Program-integrated information literacy instruction for online graduate students. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6 (2), 67–78

Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2020). A guide to online supervision. United Kingdom Council of Graduate Education (UKCGE). Retrieved from http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/media/download.aspx?MediaId=2268

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. Supporting lifelong learning (pp. 121–136). Routledge

Ma, V. W., Dana, N. F., Adams, A., & Kennedy, B. L. (2018). Understanding the problem of practice: An analysis of professional practice EdD dissertations. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3 (1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.50

MacLennan, H., Piña, A., & Gibbons, S. (2018). Content analysis of DBA and PhD dissertations in business. Journal of Education for Business , 93 (4), 149–154

Marsh, D. D., Dembo, M. H., Gallagher, K. S., & Stowe, K. H. (2010). Examining the capstone experience in a cutting edge EdD program. In J. Gaetane & A. Normore (Eds.), Educational leadership preparation: Innovation and interdisciplinary approaches to the EdD and graduate education (pp. 203–235). Palgrave Macmillan

Chapter Google Scholar

Maxwell, T. W. (2009). Producing the professional doctorate: The portfolio as a legitimate alternative to the dissertation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 46 (2), 135–145

Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48 (3), 185–198

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge

Perry, J. A. (2013). Carnegie project on the education doctorate: The education doctorate-A degree for our time. Planning and Changing, 44 (3/4), 113

Richards, J., Dykeman, C., & Bender, S. (2018). Content, methodology, and design selections in counselor education dissertations. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy , 5 (1), 27–44

Ritzhaupt, A. D., Valle, N., & Sommer, M. (2020). Design, development, and evaluation of an online statistics course for educational technology doctoral students: A design and development case. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 4 (2), 119–135

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35 (3), 25–32

Stufflebeam, D. (2000). CIPP evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.). Springer

Wetzel, K., & Ewbank, A. (2013). Conceptualizing the innovation: Factors influencing doctoral candidates’ interventions in the action research dissertation. Educational Action Research, 21 (3), 392–411

Willis, J., Inman, D., & Valenti, R. (2010). Completing a professional practice dissertation: A guide for doctoral students and faculty . Information Age

Zambo, D. (2014). Theory in the service of practice: theories in action research dissertations written by students in education doctorate programs. Educational Action Research, 22 (4), 505–517

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Education, University of Florida, PO Box 117048, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

Swapna Kumar, Kara Dawson & Gage Jeter

University of Florida, 302 Tigert hall , PO Box 113245, Gainesville, FL, 32611-3245, USA

Rhiannon Pollard

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swapna Kumar .

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Florida.

Conflict of Interest

There are no potential conflicts of interests. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Pollard, R. et al. Analyzing Theories, Conceptual Frameworks, and Research Methods in EdD Dissertations. TechTrends 66 , 721–728 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00739-4

Download citation

Accepted : 13 April 2022

Published : 27 May 2022

Issue Date : July 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00739-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Dissertation Methodology

In any research, the methodology chapter is one of the key components of your dissertation. It provides a detailed description of the methods you used to conduct your research and helps readers understand how you obtained your data and how you plan to analyze it. This section is crucial for replicating the study and validating its results.

Here are the basic elements that are typically included in a dissertation methodology:

Introduction : This section should explain the importance and goals of your research .
Research Design : Outline your research approach and why it’s appropriate for your study. You might be conducting an experimental research, a qualitative research, a quantitative research, or a mixed-methods research.
Data Collection : This section should detail the methods you used to collect your data. Did you use surveys, interviews, observations, etc.? Why did you choose these methods? You should also include who your participants were, how you recruited them, and any ethical considerations.
Data Analysis : Explain how you intend to analyze the data you collected. This could include statistical analysis, thematic analysis, content analysis, etc., depending on the nature of your study.
Reliability and Validity : Discuss how you’ve ensured the reliability and validity of your study. For instance, you could discuss measures taken to reduce bias, how you ensured that your measures accurately capture what they were intended to, or how you will handle any limitations in your study.
Ethical Considerations : This is where you state how you have considered ethical issues related to your research, how you have protected the participants’ rights, and how you have complied with the relevant ethical guidelines.
Limitations : Acknowledge any limitations of your methodology, including any biases and constraints that might have affected your study.
Summary : Recap the key points of your methodology chapter, highlighting the overall approach and rationalization of your research.

Types of Dissertation Methodology

The type of methodology you choose for your dissertation will depend on the nature of your research question and the field you’re working in. Here are some of the most common types of methodologies used in dissertations:

Experimental Research

This involves creating an experiment that will test your hypothesis. You’ll need to design an experiment, manipulate variables, collect data, and analyze that data to draw conclusions. This is commonly used in fields like psychology, biology, and physics.

Survey Research

This type of research involves gathering data from a large number of participants using tools like questionnaires or surveys. It can be used to collect a large amount of data and is often used in fields like sociology, marketing, and public health.

Qualitative Research

This type of research is used to explore complex phenomena that can’t be easily quantified. Methods include interviews, focus groups, and observations. This methodology is common in fields like anthropology, sociology, and education.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research uses numerical data to answer research questions. This can include statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques. It’s common in fields like economics, psychology, and health sciences.

Case Study Research

This type of research involves in-depth investigation of a particular case, such as an individual, group, or event. This methodology is often used in psychology, social sciences, and business.

Mixed Methods Research

This combines qualitative and quantitative research methods in a single study. It’s used to answer more complex research questions and is becoming more popular in fields like social sciences, health sciences, and education.

Action Research

This type of research involves taking action and then reflecting upon the results. This cycle of action-reflection-action continues throughout the study. It’s often used in fields like education and organizational development.

Longitudinal Research

This type of research involves studying the same group of individuals over an extended period of time. This could involve surveys, observations, or experiments. It’s common in fields like psychology, sociology, and medicine.

Ethnographic Research

This type of research involves the in-depth study of people and cultures. Researchers immerse themselves in the culture they’re studying to collect data. This is often used in fields like anthropology and social sciences.

Structure of Dissertation Methodology

The structure of a dissertation methodology can vary depending on your field of study, the nature of your research, and the guidelines of your institution. However, a standard structure typically includes the following elements:

Introduction : Briefly introduce your overall approach to the research. Explain what you plan to explore and why it’s important.
Research Design/Approach : Describe your overall research design. This can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Explain the rationale behind your chosen design and why it is suitable for your research questions or hypotheses.
Data Collection Methods : Detail the methods you used to collect your data. You should include what type of data you collected, how you collected it, and why you chose this method. If relevant, you can also include information about your sample population, such as how many people participated, how they were chosen, and any relevant demographic information.
Data Analysis Methods : Explain how you plan to analyze your collected data. This will depend on the nature of your data. For example, if you collected quantitative data, you might discuss statistical analysis techniques. If you collected qualitative data, you might discuss coding strategies, thematic analysis, or narrative analysis.
Reliability and Validity : Discuss how you’ve ensured the reliability and validity of your research. This might include steps you took to reduce bias or increase the accuracy of your measurements.
Ethical Considerations : If relevant, discuss any ethical issues associated with your research. This might include how you obtained informed consent from participants, how you ensured participants’ privacy and confidentiality, or any potential conflicts of interest.
Limitations : Acknowledge any limitations in your research methodology. This could include potential sources of bias, difficulties with data collection, or limitations in your analysis methods.
Summary/Conclusion : Briefly summarize the key points of your methodology, emphasizing how it helps answer your research questions or hypotheses.

How to Write Dissertation Methodology

Writing a dissertation methodology requires you to be clear and precise about the way you’ve carried out your research. It’s an opportunity to convince your readers of the appropriateness and reliability of your approach to your research question. Here is a basic guideline on how to write your methodology section:

1. Introduction

Start your methodology section by restating your research question(s) or objective(s). This ensures your methodology directly ties into the aim of your research.

2. Approach

Identify your overall approach: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Explain why you have chosen this approach.

Qualitative methods are typically used for exploratory research and involve collecting non-numerical data. This might involve interviews, observations, or analysis of texts.
Quantitative methods are used for research that relies on numerical data. This might involve surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis.
Mixed methods use a combination of both qualitative and quantitative research methods.

3. Research Design

Describe the overall design of your research. This could involve explaining the type of study (e.g., case study, ethnography, experimental research, etc.), how you’ve defined and measured your variables, and any control measures you’ve implemented.

4. Data Collection

Explain in detail how you collected your data.

If you’ve used qualitative methods, you might detail how you selected participants for interviews or focus groups, how you conducted observations, or how you analyzed existing texts.
If you’ve used quantitative methods, you might detail how you designed your survey or experiment, how you collected responses, and how you ensured your data is reliable and valid.

5. Data Analysis

Describe how you analyzed your data.

If you’re doing qualitative research, this might involve thematic analysis, discourse analysis, or grounded theory.
If you’re doing quantitative research, you might be conducting statistical tests, regression analysis, or factor analysis.

Discuss any ethical issues related to your research. This might involve explaining how you obtained informed consent, how you’re protecting participants’ privacy, or how you’re managing any potential harms to participants.

7. Reliability and Validity

Discuss the steps you’ve taken to ensure the reliability and validity of your data.

Reliability refers to the consistency of your measurements, and you might discuss how you’ve piloted your instruments or used standardized measures.
Validity refers to the accuracy of your measurements, and you might discuss how you’ve ensured your measures reflect the concepts they’re supposed to measure.

8. Limitations

Every study has its limitations. Discuss the potential weaknesses of your chosen methods and explain any obstacles you faced in your research.

9. Conclusion

Summarize the key points of your methodology, emphasizing how it helps to address your research question or objective.

Example of Dissertation Methodology

An Example of Dissertation Methodology is as follows:

Chapter 3: Methodology

Introduction

This chapter details the methodology adopted in this research. The study aimed to explore the relationship between stress and productivity in the workplace. A mixed-methods research design was used to collect and analyze data.

Research Design

This study adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The rationale for this approach is that while quantitative data can provide a broad overview of the relationships between variables, qualitative data can provide deeper insights into the nuances of these relationships.

Data Collection Methods

Quantitative Data Collection : An online self-report questionnaire was used to collect data from participants. The questionnaire consisted of two standardized scales: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to measure stress levels and the Individual Work Productivity Questionnaire (IWPQ) to measure productivity. The sample consisted of 200 office workers randomly selected from various companies in the city.

Qualitative Data Collection : Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants chosen from the initial sample. The interview guide included questions about participants’ experiences with stress and how they perceived its impact on their productivity.

Data Analysis Methods

Quantitative Data Analysis : Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the survey data. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between stress and productivity.

Qualitative Data Analysis : Interviews were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo software. This process allowed for identifying and analyzing patterns and themes regarding the impact of stress on productivity.

Reliability and Validity

To ensure reliability and validity, standardized measures with good psychometric properties were used. In qualitative data analysis, triangulation was employed by having two researchers independently analyze the data and then compare findings.

Ethical Considerations

All participants provided informed consent prior to their involvement in the study. They were informed about the purpose of the study, their rights as participants, and the confidentiality of their responses.

Limitations

The main limitation of this study is its reliance on self-report measures, which can be subject to biases such as social desirability bias. Moreover, the sample was drawn from a single city, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Where to Write Dissertation Methodology

In a dissertation or thesis, the Methodology section usually follows the Literature Review. This placement allows the Methodology to build upon the theoretical framework and existing research outlined in the Literature Review, and precedes the Results or Findings section. Here’s a basic outline of how most dissertations are structured:

Acknowledgements
Literature Review (or it may be interspersed throughout the dissertation)
Methodology
Results/Findings
References/Bibliography

In the Methodology chapter, you will discuss the research design, data collection methods, data analysis methods, and any ethical considerations pertaining to your study. This allows your readers to understand how your research was conducted and how you arrived at your results.

Advantages of Dissertation Methodology

The dissertation methodology section plays an important role in a dissertation for several reasons. Here are some of the advantages of having a well-crafted methodology section in your dissertation:

Clarifies Your Research Approach : The methodology section explains how you plan to tackle your research question, providing a clear plan for data collection and analysis.
Enables Replication : A detailed methodology allows other researchers to replicate your study. Replication is an important aspect of scientific research because it provides validation of the study’s results.
Demonstrates Rigor : A well-written methodology shows that you’ve thought critically about your research methods and have chosen the most appropriate ones for your research question. This adds credibility to your study.
Enhances Transparency : Detailing your methods allows readers to understand the steps you took in your research. This increases the transparency of your study and allows readers to evaluate potential biases or limitations.
Helps in Addressing Research Limitations : In your methodology section, you can acknowledge and explain the limitations of your research. This is important as it shows you understand that no research method is perfect and there are always potential weaknesses.
Facilitates Peer Review : A detailed methodology helps peer reviewers assess the soundness of your research design. This is an important part of the publication process if you aim to publish your dissertation in a peer-reviewed journal.
Establishes the Validity and Reliability : Your methodology section should also include a discussion of the steps you took to ensure the validity and reliability of your measurements, which is crucial for establishing the overall quality of your research.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and...

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences

Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and...

Shadowy Russian actors spread Princess Kate conspiracies, analysis finds

LONDON — Social media accounts linked to a prominent Russian disinformation campaign were all too happy to capitalize on conspiracy theories about the whereabouts of Kate, Princess of Wales , according to an analysis by British security experts.

The role played by these shadowy Russian actors may serve as an alarming test case, experts said, in a year when elections in Washington and Europe will be buffeted by the long-standing fake news threat — which is now being supercharged by artificial intelligence .

However, clear as the malicious foreign involvement in the #KateGate conspiracy was, the researchers at the Security, Crime and Intelligence Innovation Institute at Cardiff University in Wales were quick to point out that these actors were not responsible for originating rumors and conspiracy theories surrounding the princess, before she revealed last week that she was being treated for cancer .

“It’s not as though these Russia-linked accounts were driving the story; they were jumping on it,” said Martin Innes, the institute’s director. “It was already being framed in conspiracy terms, so foreign actors don’t need to set that frame — that’s already there to exploit.”

Conjuring these theories was usually the work of Western influencers with high follower counts, regular social media users engaging with them. While some cracked jokes and posted memes, others took a more sinister tone as people speculated about Kate's whereabouts. Traditional media played its own role in the feedback loop by amplifying and prolonging the circus.

But Innes and his colleagues said they identified 45 accounts posting about Kate on X that bore the hallmarks of the Russian disinformation campaign known as Doppelgänger. For the researchers who have spent years analyzing this sort of traffic, telltale signs included the accounts’ usernames and the fact that they had apparently been created in batches and were all using the same wording. Some were easy to mark out because they posted pro-Russia or anti-Ukraine content.

The campaign’s aims are twofold, Innes said. First, use the traffic spike associated with Kate to disseminate pro-Russia content, often related to its war in Ukraine . Second, sow discord.

“It’s about destabilization. It’s about undermining trust in institutions: government, monarchy, media — everything,” he said. “These kinds of stories are ideal vehicles by which they do that.”

Doppelgänger was first identified in 2022 by EU DisinfoLab , a nonprofit group of experts based in Europe that investigates the spread of disinformation online. In the past, this “Russia-based influence operation network” has worked by cloning the websites of traditional media companies, posting fake articles and promoting them on social media, EU DisinfoLab says on its website. The technology has likely become more sophisticated since then.

“These are not groups that are part of the state security services, as has happened with other operations,” Innes said. Rather, this campaign is run by “commercial firms who are getting contracts from the Kremlin.”

NBC News has emailed the Kremlin and the Russian Foreign Ministry for comment.

Britain’s Telegraph newspaper also reported this week that Russia might not be the only country involved. Citing anonymous government sources, it reported that China and Iran were also fueling disinformation related to the princess.

When it came to the Russia-linked accounts, they did not come up with their own conspiracy theories in relation to Kate, but rather replied to existing posts, often but not exclusively with pro-Russia, anti-Ukraine content, Innes said. The researchers focused on X because of their ability to collate and analyze its posts quickly. But that may only be the tip of the iceberg.

“For independent researchers, getting a good view into TikTok is really difficult,” he said. “But just to kind of give you some sense of scale, we’ve done a bit of research and the #KateGate story had 14 billion views in one month.” These were overall views and not only those linked to Russian accounts.

The already rich ecosystem of conspiracy theories — hardly dissuaded by blanket coverage in traditional media — gave them an ample canvas on which to work.

The story was “a perfect cocktail in terms of the things that you need for conspiracy theories to thrive,” said Sander van der Linden, a psychology professor at the University of Cambridge who researches why people are influenced by misinformation.

The royal family has always been the target of conspiracy theories suggesting they are somehow “conspiring behind the scenes and plotting nefarious goals,” van der Linden said. He added that the edited photo of Kate and her three children that Kensington Palace released earlier this month had played right into this mindset.

Added in the mix are the declining global trust in institutions such as media and governments, a “mass panic about AI and manipulated news and imagery online,” and the “newer development” whereby “everyone with a social media account feels that they can be their own sleuth, uncovering details and having fun playing investigator online,” he said.

These factors are all a big worry for experts in a year that will yield a presidential election in the United States , as well as votes in the European Union , India and elsewhere.

The Russian actors “are seeing right now that this can be hugely successful,” van der Linden said. “They just wait for a controversial issue, then massively amplify it. So this could be a sort of training phase for them almost, to see how they would do it during an actual election.”

Alexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.

Request info
Majors & Degrees
Prospective Students
Current Undergraduate Students
Current Graduate Students
Online Students
Alumni and Friends
Faculty and Staff

USM Honors College Students Present Thesis Research at Marketing Conference

Tue, 03/26/2024 - 09:14am | By: Van Arnold

Marketing Theory and Practice Conference

University of Southern Mississippi (USM) Honors College students Haeden Overby and Patrick Tyson presented their thesis research during the 2024 Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Conference (AMTP) held earlier this month in Hilton Head, S.C.

Overby, a hospitality and tourism management major, and Tyson, an anthropology, sociology, and Spanish major, presented individual research papers, as well as a collaborative project, at the international and interdisciplinary academic marketing conference which brings together academic theory and real-world marketing practices.

This year’s conference saw more than 100 submissions. Of the 33 student paper submissions across undergraduate, Master's, and Ph.D. levels, Overby’s thesis paper – “Service robots’ effect on branding and consumers' intentions through online reviews” - won the James E. Randall Best Student Paper Award.

“Haeden and Patrick are exceptional students in my class. Their passion for research and dedication to their thesis projects have impressed me,” said Dr. Wei Wang, Associate Professor, Hospitality and Tourism Management Program Coordinator who served as both students’ thesis advisor. “Moreover, their active involvement and leadership roles on campus exemplify their commitment to excellence beyond academics,”

Tyson presented a research paper titled, “Uncertainty avoidance moderation over film-motivated tourists' views on destination image, place attachment, and intentions.”

Collaboratively, they presented a paper titled, “Cookies and calamari: Squid Game’s “Dalgona” and cutting shapes from its impact on Korean product purchase and travel intentions.”

“My advisors, Dr. Wei Wang and Dr. Banu Bas, have been incredibly patient teaching me about the research process, and I would not have been able to succeed without their support,” said Overby. “Dr. Randall is retiring from the AMTP conference this year, and the award was named after him for the first time. I am pleased to be the first recipient of the award under his name and am incredibly thankful I had the chance to meet him when I was presented the award.”

Added Overby, “This accomplishment has become great motivation to continue my research in marketing and to cross the finish line of submitting my thesis. I am glad to bring home a new award for Southern Miss Business!"

More information about the conference can be found here .

To learn more about USM’s College of Business and Economic Development, call 601.266.4659.

Categories: Business and Economic Development Honors College

Recent News Articles

Six individuals to receive young professional scholarship at the 2024 national sports safety and security conference & exhibition, usm to host annual public health symposium april 3, usm names kennedy as associate vice president for research.

Anti-Critical-Race-Theory Laws Are Slowing Down. Here Are 3 Things to Know

Is it the beginning of the end of “anti-critical race theory” legislation?

Starting in 2021, state lawmakers introduced a wave of such proposals, many modeled off a 2020 executive order signed by then-President Trump forbidding federal employees from receiving training on a number of “divisive concepts,” including the idea that any race was inherently superior to another, or that individuals should bear guilt for things that happened in the past. Some of these bills explicitly name-checked critical race theory—an academic framework for analyzing structural racism in law and policy.

Education Week recently updated its ongoing tracker of these laws , and concluded the pace of newly introduced legislation has slowed. The organization has counted just 10 bills that would affect K-12 education so far in 2024, of which two have passed.

Analysts from the National Conference of State Legislatures who track trends in state-level proposals said their data generally matched EdWeek’s, and that momentum on this topic seems to have flagged.

But other issues around what schools can teach or discuss have replaced the interest in “divisive concepts” and critical race theory, including “parents’ rights” bills allowing parents to withdraw their children from lessons they object to; bills that specifically take aim at gender identity or students’ use of pronouns; and bills that aim to restrict library materials and other curriculum content. (EdWeek’s bill tracker does not look at those topics.)

Some analysts see the slowdown on critical race theory legislation as a sign of fatigue with this element of the ongoing battle over who should shape curriculum.

“There’s only 50 states and only a subset that are sort of safe Republican ones where politicians can vote for these without worrying about being held politically accountable, so it can’t keep going forever,” noted Jeffrey Henig, a professor of political science and education at Teachers College, Columbia University. “You can only signal-call so long, so it’s not that surprising that once people have done their pass and proven themselves to the true believers in their largely solid, gerrymandered, state-legislated districts, things would run out of steam in some way.”

It’s also possible, he said, that the wave of headlines about book restrictions and attacks on librarians have brought some of these issues home locally in ways that have made some constituents uncomfortable.

Here are three things to know about where states stand on these anti-critical race theory laws.

1. Action seems concentrated in a handful of states

So far, no state that had not already considered such a proposal in prior years has seen a lawmaker introduce one in the 2024 legislative cycle. Overall, 44 states have considered legislation or regulations to curb how issues of race and gender can be taught since 2021, and 18 of them have enacted policy.

Most of the 2024 legislation has been introduced in states where previous proposals have failed to pass. Missouri lawmakers, for example, have introduced four bills this year that would variously prohibit the teaching of certain “divisive concepts” related to gender and race, prohibit the teaching of The New York Times’ 1619 Project—an exploration of slavery’s role in shaping American policy—and prohibit teachers from requiring students to create projects that compel students to lobby or engage in activism on specific policies or social issues, among other things. The state had some 20 bills on these same topics in 2023, none of which passed.

Two new laws have passed so far in 2024, in Alabama and Utah—expanding restrictions those states already had on the books (see No. 3, below).

2. Already-passed laws are here to stay—for now

The 2024 session also brought an early test of these laws’ durability.

In New Hampshire, Democrats attempted to strike statutory language added as part of a 2021 budget law that forbids teachers from teaching about gender and race in specific ways. But on March 14, lawmakers voted 192-183, largely along party lines, to indefinitely postpone the bill, effectively killing it.

Attempts to undo the laws could come through the courts. Lawsuits from various combinations of parents, teachers, students, teachers’ unions, and civil rights organizations have been filed in at least six states— Arizona , Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma , New Hampshire, and Tennessee. The lawsuits generally allege that the laws are impermissibly vague and violate students’ and teachers’ rights to free speech or due process.

The latest lawsuit, filed just this week by two students and their teacher in Little Rock, Ark., takes aim at that state’s executive order and legislation that forbid “teaching that would indoctrinate students with ideologies,” including critical race theory. State officials had cited those rules when determining that the newly developed AP African American Studies course would not count for credit .

3. A few new laws suggest a pivot toward targeting DEI programs

Two newer laws signed this year suggest that diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI, programs could be the latest target.

These anti-DEI laws gained traction after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last year that bans affirmative action in college admissions, and appear to be aimed mainly at higher education institutions. But several would also prohibit DEI efforts in K-12 schools and districts.

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a law that prohibits public universities and schools from sponsoring any diversity, equity, and inclusion program or maintaining a DEI office, or from requiring students or faculty to attend training or affirm the “divisive concepts” the state already had forbidden from teaching.

Similarly, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox in January signed a law aimed mainly at public colleges and universities but also covers other state institutions, including public schools. It prohibits districts from training staff or students on “discriminatory practices,” including any that rely on personal identity characteristics as a marker of moral character, promote resentment, or assert that an individual is inherently privileged or oppressed, among other things. And it prohibits districts from establishing an office, division, or employee who coordinates activities related to those practices.

Here, too, Henig sees the possibility of overreach.

“People’s attitudes about Harvard and Columbia and Penn as these elite, distanced institutions are different if it starts playing out at Michigan State and your local community college,” he said. “I think there’s some of that same friction when it comes closer to home.”

Sign Up for EdWeek Update

Edweek top school jobs.

Ahenewa El-Amin leads a conversation with students during her AP African American Studies class at Henry Clay High School in Lexington, Ky., on March 19, 2024.

Sign Up & Sign In

IMAGES

How to Write the Best Theoretical Framework for Your Dissertation
How to Pick a Theoretical / Conceptual Framework For Your Dissertation
phd thesis theoretical framework
Why is theoretical framework important in research?
How to Pick a Theoretical / Conceptual Framework For Your Dissertation
Creating Theoretical Framework for Dissertation { in 3 Easy Steps }

VIDEO

What Is a Thesis?
Dynamic Graph Theoretical Analysis of Functional Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease The Importance
Research introduction structure
How to Construct Quantitative Research Questions and Hypotheses
Game Theoretical Analysis of Mining Strategy for Bitcoin NG Blockchain Protocol
#MixedMethods #DissertationWriting #ResearchMethodolog y#AcademicResearch #DataCollection #mindset

COMMENTS

What Is a Theoretical Framework?
This part of your dissertation lays the foundations that will support your analysis, helping you interpret your results and make broader generalizations. Examples: Theoretical frameworks in research. The same research topic can be approached very differently depending on which theoretical approach you take, even within the same field. For example:
What is a Theoretical Framework?
This part of your dissertation lays the foundations that will support your analysis, helping you interpret your results and make broader generalisations. Examples: Theoretical frameworks in research. The same research topic can be approached very differently depending on which theoretical approach you take, even within the same field. For example:
Theoretical Framework Example for a Thesis or Dissertation
Theoretical Framework Example for a Thesis or Dissertation. Published on October 14, 2015 by Sarah Vinz . Revised on July 18, 2023 by Tegan George. Your theoretical framework defines the key concepts in your research, suggests relationships between them, and discusses relevant theories based on your literature review.
What is a Theoretical Framework? How to Write It (with Examples)
A theoretical framework guides the research process like a roadmap for the study, so you need to get this right. Theoretical framework 1,2 is the structure that supports and describes a theory. A theory is a set of interrelated concepts and definitions that present a systematic view of phenomena by describing the relationship among the variables for explaining these phenomena.
PDF UNDERSTANDING, SELECTING, AND INTEGRATING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ...
thread theory throughout the dissertation. Keywords: theoretical framework, dissertation, doctoral, academic writing, research methods T he dissertation is a labor of love requiring much work, sweat, and tears, as well as organization skills and extensive resources from others who are involved with the process.
6 Steps to Mastering the Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation
As the pivotal section of your dissertation, the theoretical framework will be the lens through which your readers should evaluate your research. It's also a necessary part of your writing and research processes from which every written section will be built. In their journal article titled Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the ...
Theoretical Framework
Theoretical Framework. Definition: Theoretical framework refers to a set of concepts, theories, ideas, and assumptions that serve as a foundation for understanding a particular phenomenon or problem.It provides a conceptual framework that helps researchers to design and conduct their research, as well as to analyze and interpret their findings.. In research, a theoretical framework explains ...
Theoretical Framework for Dissertation
Content for Theoretical Framework. Your theoretical framework of a dissertation should incorporate existing theories that are relevant to your study. It will also include defining the terms mentioned in the hypothesis , research questions, and problem statement. All these concepts should be clearly identified as the first step.
Theoretical Framework
Here are some strategies to develop of an effective theoretical framework: Examine your thesis title and research problem. The research problem anchors your entire study and forms the basis from which you construct your theoretical framework. ... If you're asked to apply an existing theory to a research problem, the analysis will likely include ...
Example Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation or Thesis
Revised on 10 October 2022. Your theoretical framework defines the key concepts in your research, suggests relationships between them, and discusses relevant theories based on your literature review. A strong theoretical framework gives your research direction, allowing you to convincingly interpret, explain, and generalise from your findings.
How to Write a Theoretical Framework: A Step-by-Step Guide
Author: Jessica Parker, EdD. In this step-by-step guide, we will walk you through the process of writing a theoretical framework, from understanding the basics to revising and refining your work. Whether you are a novice researcher or an experienced scholar, this guide will help you craft a solid theoretical foundation for your study.
Writing theoretical frameworks, analytical frameworks and conceptual
A theoretical framework, the way I define it, is comprised of the different theories and theoretical constructs that help explain a phenomenon. A theoretical framework sets out the various expectations that a theory posits and how they would apply to a specific case under analysis, and how one would use theory to explain a particular phenomenon.
PDF A Complete Dissertation
DISSERTATION CHAPTERS Order and format of dissertation chapters may vary by institution and department. 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Methodology 4. Findings 5. Analysis and synthesis 6. Conclusions and recommendations Chapter 1: Introduction This chapter makes a case for the signifi-cance of the problem, contextualizes the
Qualitative Data Analysis and the Use of Theory
The incorporation of fine art-based courses into universities has challenged the prescribed rules of the doctoral thesis, initially resulting in a debate—with echoes of Glaser and Strauss—as to whether theory, if used initially, is too directive, thereby potentially contaminating the performance, or whether theory application should be an ...
Integration of a theoretical framework into your research study
Often the most difficult part of a research study is preparing the proposal based around a theoretical or philosophical framework. Graduate students '…express confusion, a lack of knowledge, and frustration with the challenge of choosing a theoretical framework and understanding how to apply it'.1 However, the importance in understanding and applying a theoretical framework in research ...
Choosing a Theoretical Framework: Popular Theories for Dissertation
Deci and Ryan's (2000) self-determination theory is a very common choice for the theoretical framework among our dissertation assistance clients. Central to self-determination theory is the proposition that our motivation stems from satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2008).
A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual
In contrast, deductive thematic analysis, also referred to as "theoretical thematic analysis," is grounded in a pre-existing theory or framework, which guides the coding and theme development (Braun & Clarke, 2006). It involves the application of an existing theoretical or conceptual framework to structure and interpret the data.
Analyzing Theories, Conceptual Frameworks, and Research ...
Dissertation guiding principles and purposefully designed research curriculum guide the conceptualization and structure of dissertations in the EdD in Educational Technology at a large university in the US. An analysis of 69 dissertations completed by the first five cohorts over ten years was conducted to determine the theories, frameworks, and research designs used by professional students to ...
Dissertation Methodology
In a dissertation or thesis, the Methodology section usually follows the Literature Review. This placement allows the Methodology to build upon the theoretical framework and existing research outlined in the Literature Review, and precedes the Results or Findings section. Here's a basic outline of how most dissertations are structured: Title Page
PDF A Game Theoretic Approach to the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
The tools of game theory have profoundly influenced the way in which practitioners and academics analyze conflict. Most notably, game theory was vital in shaping American foreign policy and military strategy throughout the Cold War (Hesse, 2010). Yet, research utilizing game theory in application to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is scarce.
What is the difference between literature review, theoretical analysis
A dissertation would generally require a much more comprehensive literature review than a journal article. ... So theoretical analysis would be on a grander scale whereas conceptual analysis would ...
Different Types of Dissertation
A dissertation that draws upon major theories, such as in education more often takes an applied route, but can also be exclusively theoretical, for example, some work in the philosophy of education. Narrative dissertations. You're more than likely to choose doing an empirical or a non-empirical dissertation.
Shadowy Russian actors spread Princess Kate conspiracies, analysis finds
Social media accounts linked to a prominent Russian disinformation campaign capitalized on conspiracy theories about Kate, Princess of Wales, an analysis found.
USM Honors College Students Present Thesis Research at Marketing
University of Southern Mississippi (USM) Honors College students Haeden Overby and Patrick Tyson presented their thesis research during the 2024 Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Conference (AMTP) held earlier this month in Hilton Head, S.C. Overby, a hospitality and tourism management ...
Anti-Critical-Race-Theory Laws Are Slowing Down. Here Are 3 Things to Know
After a wave of bills limiting class discussions on race and gender, an Education Week analysis shows the policies have slowed. Anti-Critical-Race-Theory Laws Are Slowing Down. Here Are 3 Things ...

Have a language expert improve your writing

Theoretical Framework Example for a Thesis or Dissertation

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Table of contents

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free!

Cite this Scribbr article

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

Proofreading

Translation

Graphic Design

6 Steps to Mastering the Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation

Complete your review of literature first

Understand the purpose of a theoretical framework

Use your theoretical framework to justify your research

Keep it within three to five pages

Use models and other graphics

Use a checklist after completing your first draft

A final note

Related Posts

How to Write an Effective Thesis Discussion

201 Online Research Databases and Search Engines

Need an academic editor before submitting your work?

Theoretical Framework for Dissertation – What and How

Content for Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework Goals

2. Define and Evaluate Relevant Concepts, Theories, and Models

3. Adding Value to the Existing Knowledge

Types of Research Questions you can Answer

Theoretical Framework Structure

Length of Theoretical Framework of Dissertation

Sample Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation

How can ResearchProspect Help?

Looking for dissertation help?

Frequently Asked Questions

You May Also Like

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

Importance of Theory and a Theoretical Framework

Strategies for Developing the Theoretical Framework

Structure and Writing Style

Writing Tip

Another Writing Tip

Yet Another Writing Tip

Still Yet Another Writing Tip

Have a language expert improve your writing

Example Theoretical Framework of a Dissertation or Thesis

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Table of contents

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Cite this Scribbr article

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

Writing theoretical frameworks, analytical frameworks and conceptual frameworks

7 Responses

About Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD

Recent Posts

Follow me on Twitter:

Article contents

Theory and Qualitative Data Analysis

Paradigms: From Interactionism to Performativity

The First Wave

The Second Wave

The Third Wave

The Fourth Wave

Methodologies: From Anthropology to Fine Arts

Implications of Changes for the Researcher

Bibliography

Related Articles

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Statistics from Altmetric.com

What is a theory?

Using a theoretical framework in a research study

Example 2: the Health Decisions Model

Example 3: the nursing role effectiveness model

Read the full text or download the PDF:

blog @ precision

Analyzing Theories, Conceptual Frameworks, and Research Methods in EdD Dissertations

Cite this article

Access this article