literature review for child labour

Literature review of child labour

This comprehensive literature review of child labour summarises the literature on child time allocation, the types of work children participate in, the impact of work on schooling, health, and externalities associated with child work. It also considers the literature on the determinants of child time allocation (child labour) such as the influence of local labour markets, family interactions, the net return of schooling and poverty. Additionally, the paper discusses evidence on policy options aimed at influencing child labour.

Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review

Alhassan abdullah.

1 Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; kh.ukh.tcennoc@assahlaa (A.A.); kh.ukh@hnyuhi (I.H.); kh.ukh@yremec (C.R.E.)

2 Department of Sociology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA

Inès Huynh

Clifton r. emery, lucy p. jordan, associated data.

Not applicable.

Background. Research has established the family as the predominant context for child labor practices. Decisions to involve children in child labor within the family or by a family member (herein family child labor) is strongly motivated by cultural beliefs that normalize child labor. This systematic review sought to synthesize evidence on the social norms that support child labor practices, and the normative interpretation of international child labor legislation/standards. Methods. We followed the PRISMA procedure for systematic review by reviewing empirical articles published between 2000 to 2021 and contained within the four key databases: Scopus, ISI Web of Sciences, PubMed and Embase. Findings from 13 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed thematically. Results. The review included studies from three continents: Africa, Asia and Europe. Gender norms, informal apprenticeship norm, norms on succession and sustenance as well as obedience, were key social norms that influenced child labor practices in the family. Parents’ decision to involve children in child labor was strongly influenced by the collective acceptance of some occupations (e.g., cocoa farming and fishing) as family occupations, which need to be preserved, undertaken and passed on to children. Child rights and the UNCRC principle of children’s participation were considered foreign to most non-western countries and interpreted as contravention to the cherished social norm of obedience. The findings underlie the link between social norms and the common social values of resilience, hard work, and respect. Conclusion. The results provide foundations and target to develop normative change intervention programs to re-orient the negative interpretations of common social values and provide alternative pathways that prevent child labor within the social context.

1. Introduction

Child labor remains a major issue concerning child protection, despite increased research attention on its severity, causes and the intervention measures to curb it [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. According to estimates by the International Labor Organization (ILO), over 246 million children (between 5 and 17 years) are involved in child labor, with 48 million located in sub-Saharan Africa [ 6 ]. Over two thirds of child labor cases happen in the agricultural sector, with more than 70% happening within the family unit [ 6 ]. Agriculture and other works undertaken by children in the family are “often hazardous in [their] nature and in the circumstances in which [they are] carried out” [ 6 ]. The fact that the family unit is regarded as a suitable context for child labor, where family members influence the involvement of children in labor, makes child labor within the family (henceforth family child labor) an important area and target for research into child labor. Literature on the causes of child labor underscore two critical antecedent factors: (1) economic forces and (2) cultural norms/values that support child labor [ 1 , 3 , 7 , 8 ]. Growing evidence has shown that the impacts of economic forces on child labor is mediated by cultural norms [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], and the cultural norms influence the choice families make for their children [ 9 ]. Even families who are stable economically have been found to allow their children to engage in work, e.g., using them as headsmen [ 12 ], highlighting the instrumental role of social norms in influencing child labor decisions within the family unit. Norms are deep-rooted beliefs that influence social actions within an institutionalized group. However, no study has so far systematically analyzed the sort of cultural norms and values that influence child labor decisions within the family. Social norms are predicted to have consequences on the health of people [ 13 ], mediated through the effects on health-seeking behavior, alcohol use and other risk factors [ 14 , 15 ].

Sociologists typically study social norms and their impact on social actions/decisions under the rubric of Parsons’ statement; legitimacy of social values are unquestionable, however normative interpretation of the values differ and often matters the most [ 16 ]. Much research on the impact of cultural values and social norms follows Parsons’ [ 16 ] argument by seeking to examine the different pathways social values are interpreted to influence social actions and decisions. Primary research on the influence of cultural values on child labor has shown that parents’ decisions to involve children in child labor are influenced by their desire to ensure that children secure a better future [ 17 ], become hard working people [ 18 ], are resilient to life challenges [ 19 ] and to ensure their adequate development [ 18 ]. Inherent in these justifications of child labor are the normative interpretations of common social values, such as hard work, success, and resilience, within the culture. They show that normative interpretations matter in efforts to change values in communities. On the other hand, the value of success in other contexts may not be normatively interpreted with associated social actions that bear on involving children in family work/child labor. Instead, they may be operationalized through enrollment in education. For instance, Green [ 20 ] reports that Western perspectives on childhood highlight the need for children to be free from adult responsibilities and acquire the best formal education to ensure their success in the future. Varied normative interpretations of common social values and their influence on family child labor decisions led us to argue that social norms play a central role in an attempt to understand and address the child labor phenomenon. Weiner [ 21 ] reports cultural values among the key antecedents of children’s work. This systematic review of existing literature seeks to examine the social norms that underpin child labor within the family in order to provide systematic evidence to inform research and intervention programs.

1.1. Social Norms, Child Work and Family Child Labor

Child labor in the family is a contested concept, especially in the context of cultures that traditionally require children to perform domestic duties and support their parents as part of their childhood training [ 22 , 23 ]. Whilst some argue that child work is an essential requirement for the socialization of children [ 24 , 25 ], others have found child work as an architect to child labor, child exploitation [ 26 , 27 ], and modern slavery [ 28 ]. The International Labor Organization (ILO) defines child work as all productive activities that are carried out by children (either in a family business or common market; remunerated or not) that last for a minimum of 1 h duration within a day [ 6 , 29 ]. Duration of work, nature, intensity of work, and the age of the child are typical features that determine child work. Similar features determine the judgement of child labor [ 30 ]. The ILO Convention 138 [ 31 ] sets a minimum threshold of 15 years for a child’s admission to work, and 18 years for hazardous work [ 6 , 32 ]; but many developing countries have the flexibility to admit children aged 14 years to engage in “light work”. So far, the extant literature on child work and child labor have agreed that there is a very thin line between the two concepts (child work and child labor), which is often difficult to determine until they have happened [ 29 ]. They are difficult to differentiate in practice [ 29 ], and vary from nation to nation [ 33 ]. It is more difficult to differentiate child work and child labor in localities that have sanctioned child work as part of the socio-cultural traditions [ 6 ]. White [ 27 ] highlights the complexities involved in the two concepts.

“It is impossible to draw a clear and unambiguous line between ‘child work’ (the more acceptable forms of children’s work, which are relatively unharmful and in cases may even be beneficial) and ‘child labour’, the unacceptable, exploitative and harmful forms of children’s work, a ‘social evil’. Most attempts to draw such a line are either too general, vague and circular to be of use, or if they try to be concrete and specific, are too contradictory and illogical, and out of line with the views of children themselves.” [ 27 ] (p. 837)

Essentially, the argument suggests that promoting child work may risk promoting child labor within the family unit. This is particularly the case as recent child labor statistics identify the family unit as the main contexts where child labor thrives [ 6 ]. Nonetheless, evidence on the central role of culture in underpinning child work and child labor suggests that culture or social norms could be an important source in efforts to understand how child work and child labor can be differentiated, understood and prevented.

Similarities in the social norms and value aspirations that underpin both child work and child labor also convolute the seemingly cybernetic relationship between child work and child labor in most cultural contexts. Children are considered to work on family farms as part of their preparation for adulthood, and to acquire basic skills that are integral for their development [ 18 , 34 ]. Children’s involvement in family farms increases family income and enhances family standard of living [ 17 ]. Their participation in fishing and family cocoa farms are regarded as important means to secure better future for children [ 17 ] and to maintain family businesses [ 35 ]. Similarly, it is believed that the involvement of children in labor increases their affection for the labor market and enhances their personal development [ 19 ]. Engaging in child labor is considered an acceptable pathway to prepare children to be hardworking adults, and resilient to future work challenges [ 19 ]. Children in Turkey are found to work during their early years in order to contribute to family farm work [ 36 ]. Inherent in these justifications of child labor and child work are normative interpretations of the values of hard work, resilience, success, and achievement. Furthermore, decisions and attitudes towards child labor in Africa are also informed by the communal expectations of respect and mutual interdependence [ 37 ].

Social sanctions, including stigma against parents, compel them to conform to the norms that support child labor practices [ 38 ]. Lopez-Calva [ 39 ] theorized that there is a direct relationship between social stigma and child labor. Stigma against parents who do not support child labor norms (fail to involve their children in child labor) is found to be associated with increased child labor practices. The desire to obtain social acceptance, avoid the likely cost of stigma and social rejection, increases the utility of engaging children in child labor. The critical role of social norms in child labor practices led us to systematically examine specific social norms in the literature and unravel ways they inform family child labor practices. Such an advancement is critical to inform further research and the development of concrete normative campaigns that shift social norms in communities.

1.2. Social Norms and Legislation on Child Labor

Local social norms that support the involvement of children in work and child labor may likely be in conflict with international standards that frown on child labor practices. Communities are more likely to value their local norms that favor child labor and to to discredit international child labor legislation. Legislation and standards to regulate child work and prevent child labor have been in existence since the identification of child labor as a major social problem affecting the growth, health and wellbeing of children [ 40 , 41 ]. Led by international organizations (such as ILO and IOM), international promulgations on standards to prevent child labor have been developed and revised consistently to protect children. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) [ 42 ], the ILO Convention No. 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labor (1999) [ 43 ] and the ILO Convention No. 138 on the Minimum Age of Employment (1973) [ 31 , 44 , 45 ] are the key international legal frameworks that regulate child labor practices. Article 32 and 35 of the UNCRC spell out issues related to the abolishment of child labor, forced labor and the need to protect children from all kinds of work exploitation. Principles in the UNCRC are developed based on the western conceptualization of childhood [ 46 ]. However, some of the commitments are echoed in other regional legislation such as The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child [ 47 ], and operationalized in the local laws of most countries. Overall, the UNCRC has an overriding commitment and target for member countries to ensure that children participate in decisions that affect them, are protected from harm, and enjoy the rights to life, survival and optimal wellbeing. However, the implementation of this legislation and its impact on children are largely influenced by social norms and values [ 48 ]. The rights of children in some contexts (e.g., South Africa) are seen as part of measures to undermine the authority of parents, traditional leaders [ 49 ] and elders [ 50 ]. Children in Africa are expected to act in response to the wishes and demands of their parents [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Children’s participation in cocoa farms is normatively interpreted as a form of agency [ 55 ]. However, the standard participation procedure spelled out in the UNCRC that allows children to exercise autonomy is considered an act that spoils children [ 55 ]. The foregoing evidence highlights the various international child labor legislation that could be interpreted within the context of local social norms, and how that influences family child labor practices. Therefore, additionally, the aim of this systematic review is to identify the various ways international child labor standards are interpreted in local contexts by seeking responses to the following key questions:

Guiding Review Questions

What social norms precipitate child labor practices?
How are international child labor legislation/standards normatively interpreted in the context of child labor?

Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [ 56 , 57 ] and recommendations by Rew [ 58 ], we conducted a comprehensive literature search to synthesize evidence on social norms that influence family child labor practice. The use of the PRISMA guideline provided a transparent framework to synthesize data following scientific principles that enable replication. Rew’s [ 58 ] suggestion helped to make vital decisions in the review process, including selecting relevant databases, setting important criteria for including studies and criteria for the screening and assessment of the quality of included studies.

2.1. Search Strategy

Four academic databases including: Scopus, ISI Web of Sciences, Pubmed and Embase, were searched. The literature searches were conducted from June to December in 2021. A combination of key words on child labor and social norms, together with Boolean operators were used in the search. Table 1 presents the keyword combinations and Boolean operators used in the search. York dare database, Cochrane library and PROSPERO database were searched to confirm the review has not been replicated elsewhere. Snowball search and expert recommendations supplemented the search procedure.

Boolean search strategy and word combinations.

Note: (*) is used to identify different ways the word maybe written.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

Following the purpose of the systematic review, a clearly defined criteria was developed to guide the screening of studies. Studies that satisfied the following criteria were included:

Articles reported qualitative or quantitative evidence (or both) on cultural norms that influence child labor practices. Additionally, (or) reported evidence on the normative interpretations of international legislation that seeks to prevent child labor practices.
Articles reported findings from the views of any of the following groups (or a combination of any of them): community members, children, parents and social service workers.
Articles are empirical studies published in English, between 2000 and October 2021. The benchmark of 2000 was chosen in line with the promulgation of the ILO standards on Worst Forms of Child Labor (1999), ( n .182), ensure that the findings are relevant to current legislation and guidelines on child labor.

2.3. Search Outcomes and Screening

A total of 7531 results were obtained from a general search through the four databases. Title, author names and other reference details of the studies were exported and saved into an excel spreadsheet. This allowed for duplicates to be automatically searched using the duplicate function in excel. In total, 2682 results were retained after duplicate titles were searched and removed. Articles that were published before 2000 and published in languages other than the English language ( n = 56) were removed before screening. The remaining articles were screened. Article titles that were beyond the scope and purpose of the study were removed ( n = 2044). This included book chapters and non-empirical studies. Six hundred and fourteen (614) articles were deemed as not satisfying the purpose and criteria for inclusion in the study. The remaining 24 articles were read thoroughly and 12 were removed as their discussion of social norms were not in the context of child labor. One additional study was found after a snowball search through the references of the 12 articles. The entire search and screening procedure was conducted by the third author and validated by the first author. The researchers conducted weekly meetings to discuss the search and screening process. There were no major disagreements with respect to judgements on the eligibility of studies. Minor disagreements, which mostly happened in the quality appraisal of studies, were keenly discussed with the senior authors (author 2 and 4). The screening process is presented in the PRISMA flow chart shown in Figure 1 below:

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijerph-19-04082-g001.jpg

PRISMA flow diagram.

2.4. Quality Appraisal

We assessed the quality of the included articles using the quality appraisal tool by Salzmann-Erikson and Dahlén [ 59 ]. A 25-item checklist was used to assess the quality of empirical studies, mostly qualitative studies, by focusing on the methodological rigor of the articles. Key questions on the appraisal checklist included: “Are the criteria for inclusion described?”, “Does the study’s title correspond with its content?”, “Are the criteria for exclusion described?”, “Is the study’s purpose clearly answered?”, “Is the data systematically collected?”. Each item was assessed using a dichotomous response of “Yes” and “No”. Articles are rated as low quality if not more than 17 items of the quality assessment checklist are rated “Yes”. Articles with 18 to 20 points “Yes” ratings are considered to be of medium quality, whilst those with more than 20 points “Yes” ratings are considered to be of high quality. Six of the included articles were considered low, two medium and five as high quality. The ratings give a general idea of key information that were missing in the published articles, but they were not used as a basis to remove articles from the study. The appraisal was performed by the first author and validated by the third author. No significant difference was recorded in the assessment by the two authors.

2.5. Analysis Procedure

We followed Braun and Clarke’s [ 60 ] recommendation for conducting reflexive thematic analysis in analyzing evidence from the included articles. As part of the screening process, each article was read thoroughly, and notes on key ideas and findings were written in the comment section of Adobe PDF reader program. The written notes captured key findings, overall ideas of the study and key contributions of the study. Direct quotes from participants in most of the articles were linked to the notes. The quotes, key ideas and author’s written notes were organized in excel for further analysis. The written notes were again reflected upon in line with the meanings they connote and their context. The written notes were then refined and stated as codes. Examples of codes included “decisions undermine respect” “part of culture to work” “we have to contribute to family income” “children are cheap labor” and “cocoa and fishing are family work”. A list of all codes from the 13 articles were organized in word together with a short description of the meaning and nuances. This enabled the researchers to compare the codes and merge them to form themes under the rubric of social norms. The core themes included: gender norms, obedience, and informal apprenticeship norm. Codes were merged based on their similarities in terms of the interpretations of particular social norms or values. A detailed report of the themes is discussed in the results section.

3.1. Study Characteristics

Out of a total of 7531 articles and reports retrieved from the broad search, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. Four of the included articles by Adonteng-Kissi [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ] were published from two broad studies. Hence, the total included articles emerged from 11 unique studies. Broadly all 13 articles included in this review examined the social norms in child labor under the rubric of understanding the causes of child labor, particularly the social and cultural causes. All articles (except [ 65 ]) involved interviews with children and parents [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ], including children who are victims of child labor and parents who are perpetrators [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. Six of the articles included the views of social services workers, and workers of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 67 ]. Most of the studies used a multi-method combination of qualitative in-depth face-to-face interviews, focus group interviews, ethnography, participatory research and/or observations [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 70 ], whilst the remaining studies used single methods: in-depth interviews [ 67 , 72 ], ethnography [ 69 ] and a combination of in-depth interviews with surveys [ 71 , 73 ]. The majority of the studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa ( n = 10) [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ], two in South Asian countries; Nepal and Bangladesh [ 69 , 72 ], one in Central Asia (Tajikistan) [ 67 ], and one in South Eastern Europe (Turkey) [ 68 ]. Child labor within specific occupations such as cocoa [ 65 , 70 ], carpet industry [ 69 ], fishing and farming [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 ] and domestic work [ 71 ] were the focus of most studies. However, 3 of the 13 articles focused on a general description of child labor and child work [ 68 , 72 , 73 ] without specifying a particular occupation. Even in such studies, participants linked their responses to child work or child labor in domestic work, farms and factories. A summary of the included studies is provided in Table 2 .

Summary of studies included in the review.

Note: GLSS = Ghana Living Standards Survey.

Themes related to social norms precipitating child labor

3.2. Informal Apprenticeship Norm

A common finding from most of the articles ( n = 8) is that children are culturally expected to receive informal apprenticeship training in the family by engaging in their parents’ primary occupations. The rationale behind the social norm of child informal apprenticeship is supported by narratives from key stakeholders, including parents [ 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , 68 , 71 ], child victims of labor [ 67 ] and agricultural coordinators [ 65 ]. Parents in a Ghanaian study [ 61 ] argued that the informal apprenticeship for children is needed to prepare children to be tough so as to meet future life challenges. A parent described how this justification influenced her involvement in street vending during her childhood:

“In my own situation, I used to be a newspaper vendor on the streets. I had to sell newspapers on the street of Accra in the morning before going to school. My parents used to tell me that they were training me to be tough in life so that I’ll be capable of facing the challenges of life.” [ 61 ] (p. 474)

Children are believed to become hardworking when they start work early. This cultural notion underlies Turkish parents’ decisions to involve their children in work.

“I want them to start working now, so that they get used to working and not become loose.” [ 68 ] (p. 46)

The rationale for training children to be tough, and hardworking through child work and child labor is complemented by the cultural belief that engaging children in labor secures a better future for them. It is the shared normative belief that children’s participation in work at early ages imbibes in them a natural spirit of hard work and makes them resilient to work-related challenges in their adulthood [ 62 , 65 , 68 ]. A parent, who is identified to have involved her child in cocoa farming, emphasized the need to engage children in work in order to ensure they have a better future.

“Our culture teaches our children to believe that work socialization is meant to provide training which will ensure a better life in the future.” [ 61 ] (p. 472)

The early child apprenticeship training is conceived normatively to inculcate strong work ethics in children, leading them to become hard workers, resilient and ultimately to achieve success. Evidence from parents in Ghana [ 64 ], Turkey [ 68 ], and Côte D’Ivoire [ 65 ] confirmed the cultural justification that children learn better [ 65 , 68 ] and obtain strong work ethics [ 64 ] when they start work early. Narratives from some parents confirmed that these cultural justifications influenced their decision to involve their children in work, albeit arguing that such work does not constitute acts of child labor.

“Whatever work I assign to my children is not intended to harm them but to train them to have strong work ethics that will in turn help them to have a better future.” [ 64 ] (p. 59)

The narrative confirms that the interpretation of social norms does indeed matter in influencing social action [ 16 ].

Additionally, inherent within the normative justification of securing a better future for children through child labor and child work is the notion that work enhances children’s level of creativity [ 63 ]. It is also meant to increase and sustain their interest in work (confirmed by evidence from Ghana, Tajikistan, South Africa and Côte-D’Ivoire) [ 64 , 65 , 67 , 71 ]. Akilova’s [ 67 ] study among children working in Tajikistan revealed that children have normalized these interpretations and as a result they consider work as a normal part of childhood. However, it appears that the children have been conscientized to consider work as part of the training within the family. As a result, they do not consider work in or with a family member as a classic form of “work”. A twelve-year-old child who started working at age 2 narrated her experience this way:

“I actually started working at age two–not really working though. I went with my cousin on herbike to sell refreshing drinks and tea to people in the market. I just accompanied her. I started working on my own when I was 12.” [ 67 ] (p. 240)

The notion of child work as a normal part of childhood was found to be stronger in rural Tajikistan [ 67 ], similar to the evidence from Ghana [ 64 ]. The legacy of the Tajikistan community, which focuses on developing children to become productive members of society, may have enforced the norm of child labor and child work, even among children [ 67 ]. Particularly, it was found that children between the ages of 12–14 were considered matured in Tajikistan.

When quizzed on how they considered child work within the family, some Ghanaian parents justified that working in the family is a traditional form of schooling, which provides alternative sources of livelihood for children [ 64 ].

“Engaging my children in fishing is simply a traditional system of schooling which doesn’t violate the rights of my children.” [ 64 ] (p. 60)

However, parent’s view on child work and child labor as alternative sources of livelihood for children appears to be strongly influenced by the high rate of graduate unemployment. The high rate of graduate unemployment made formal education unappealing to parents, which enforced their beliefs in the norms of informal apprenticeship. A parent in a rural community in Ghana affirmed this notion in her narrative:

“Why should I enrol my children in school if they’re going to be unemployed after finishing? For me, I believe it will make more sense to engage them in my farming for them to acquire some skills that will help them in their future lives.” “Why should I enrol my children in school if they’re going to be unemployed after finishing? For me, I believe it will make more sense to engage them in my farming for them to acquire some skills that will help them in their future lives.” [ 64 ] (p. 59)

The evidence highlights the strength of the social norm of informal apprenticeship in the Ghanaian society.

3.3. Gender Norm

Diverse interpretations of gender roles and expectations appeared in most of the studies as antecedents to child labor. Societal expectations on the role of males and females influenced child labor practices, and the nature of child labor related activity children are engaged in. Men are trained to become breadwinners in the family, with women as family maintenance agents ( cf . [ 62 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 72 ]). As a result, child labor in income-generating activities, such as fishing, carpet work and cocoa, was found to be common among boys, whilst girls predominantly engaged in domestic duties [ 62 , 64 , 72 ]. Most female parents confirmed the decision to engage their young girls in domestic chores as part of their training to become good wives.

“I want to use my personal experience as an example. I was the only girl amongst seven boys, so I needed to be familiar with the demands of marriage life as is required of all girls. When I was living with my siblings, I used to wash, clean and sweep for them because I was being prepared for future life. The role of a girl in the household is to provide services to the boys.” [ 62 ] (p. 13)

The cultural belief that a good wife is one who satisfies her husband’s family’s expectations influenced parents in Tajikistan to engage their children in domestic chores at their early ages [ 67 ]. Similarly, young boys in South Africa engaged in hard labor to feed their family as part of their preparation to become breadwinners for their future families [ 71 ]. It is reported that the gendered notion on child labor is enforced by social sanctions. Boys in Bangladesh who undertake household chores are labelled as “women” and called names, and vice versa [ 72 ]. Their parents are also seen as bad parents.

“If men do these jobs [housework] everyone will call him a woman.” [ 72 ] (p. 13)

It is the cultural expectation that children carry out the culturally defined occupations/activities which prepares them adequately to assume their roles as breadwinners and family maintenance agents.

3.4. Asset Value of Children

Themes and narratives from the included studies revealed that societal standards that support the asset value of children also influence child labor in the family [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 67 , 71 ]. These social standards underlie the economic importance of children’s contribution to family work and family income. Parents are therefore encouraged to engage their children in their own occupations so as to benefit from their economic value. Children are more likely to be involved in child labor in families where parents’ occupations demand a lot of labor.

“Fishing is a very difficult task and parents need more labour to be able to carry out the task. In my view, government should allow children to support their parents and supplement household income. At the low income we get from our fishing business, how can we hire only adult labourers?” [ 62 ] (p. 10)

The narrative shows that children are cheap sources of labor, as well as alternative sources of labor. The notion of children contributing to families is endorsed by parents in South Africa [ 71 ], Ghana [ 63 , 64 , 65 ] and children in Tajikistan [ 67 ]. According to parents in Ghana and South Africa, certain kinds of family occupations, such as fishing, farming and family business, require more hands [more labor] with specific tasks assigned for children in the family [ 63 , 64 , 65 , 71 ].

“This is because there is inadequate mechanisation of artisanal fishing industry. The work is quite difficult, and fishermen need more hands.” [ 64 ] (p. 60)

The need for more hands due to the lack of mechanization of fishing (use of modern fishing methods) influenced parents to involve their children in child labor. This was confirmed by another parent:

“I think many parents are using their children to work because their work is not mechanised. The State needs to support parents to mechanise their work to help eliminate child labour.” [ 64 ] (p. 60)

A chronological analysis of the above two quotes confirm that children are indeed engaged in hard work as they are meant to work in non-mechanized family fishing practices. Promoting mechanized fishing practices may provide leeway to avoid hard work in family fishing but may not completely remove children from working in family fishing.

The social expectations for children to contribute to family income is accepted by children as part of their mandatory responsibilities to their family. Some children in Tajikistan revealed that it is their obligation to contribute to their parents’ work/business so that their parents could save money (meant for hiring other staff) [ 67 ]. Children feel enthusiastic when they judge themselves to have satisfied this societal demand [ 64 ].

3.5. Value of Formal Education

A normative interpretation of the value of formal education was found to inform parents’ decisions to involve their children in child labor. Albeit diverse, there was an argument about the relevance of formal education, which influenced parents’ decisions to engage their children in labor [ 64 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Parents believed that informal apprenticeship in family work provides future job security for children, compared to formal education. Due to the low job security arising from formal education, children are believed to be better off receiving an informal apprenticeship from their parents’ occupations. The relative importance of informal apprenticeship training over formal education influenced child labor practices.

“Parents tell us that they know children in the community who have successfully completed their education, yet they don’t have jobs. Some parents believe putting their children into farm work is worthwhile because their children develop their employment skills that get them ready jobs.” [ 64 ] (p. 60)

In the context of poor school quality, low job security after school and severe challenges with school access, parents may rationally prioritize informal apprenticeship through child labor over enrolling their children in school. The high rate of graduate unemployment in many developing countries was found to support the shared belief that informally training children in family work is a better option as opposed to formal education ( cf. [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 68 ]). Some parents are further encouraged by the cultural belief that “education does not fit every child”. Parents who held this belief suggested that children who are stubborn do not require formal education, instead they should work in family farms [ 64 ].

On the other hand, some parents justified their decisions to involve children in child labor as part of the measures for children to appreciate the value of formal education. They argued that education is without stress since it does not involve hard work. Therefore, children’s experiences of both hard work and formal education would enable them to assess the two occupations and appreciate the value of formal education (see [ 68 , 69 ]). The following narrations from parents in Turkey exemplify their argument:

“I swear to God, I’m not after their money…. They don’t work and they don’t care about school. I’m saying if they work, maybe they will understand the value of school and go to school.” [ 68 ] (p. 46)

“I say maybe if they work, going to school will feel sweeter [better] to them. For instance, because work will be too hard, school will be [easier].” [ 68 ] (p. 46)

Even though the overall intention for engaging the children in hard work (child labor) is to make them accept formal education, the rationale can be defeated when the children develop a liking for the work compared to school. That said, evidence from children in Nepal suggests that children who experienced the two; formal education and family child labor, found education to be the better option [ 69 ].

3.6. Sustenance and Succession of Family Occupation

A considerable number of the studies reported findings on the social norm of sustenance and succession of family occupation [ 62 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 73 ]. Works undertaken by parents, such as farming and fishing, are conceptualized as family occupations which are supposed to be assumed by their children and sustained for future generations [ 64 ]. Evidence from parents, social service workers and NGO workers in Ghana confirmed that cocoa farming and fishing are classical family occupations which children should strive to maintain. Family occupations give identity to the family. The desire to maintain family occupation enforced parents’ commitment to involve their children in cocoa farming and fishing [ 64 , 65 ].

“Most parents are farmers in these rural communities, and very often they want their children to help them on the farms because they want to socialise their children to take over from them. However, this cultural practice is sometimes abused by some parents. Some parents engage their children in work in times that those children are supposed to be school. Children support their parents on the farms to perform tasks such as weeding, planting of seedling and burning unwanted woods in the farm. Many boys work for 8 h on the average in a day.” [ 62 ] (p. 9)

Commitment to the norm of sustenance and succession of family occupation made parents opposed to the idea and efforts to eliminate child labor (see [ 62 , 64 , 65 ]). Even professionals, such as NGO workers, who are mandated to ensure the application of child labor standards and implement measures to eliminate child labor, are sometimes influenced by these social norms.

“I have been in this community long enough to know that many farmers want their children to be socialised and take over from them and therefore they won’t agree to total elimination of child labour.” [ 62 ] (p. 10)

The findings highlight ways deep rooted social norms can influence child labor and obliterate the commitment to eliminate child labor. Training children on family occupations is considered the primary responsibilities of families to ensure that the next generation of farmers are produced [ 65 ]. A cooperative director for cocoa farmers in Côte D’Ivoire explained:

“And also we have to prepare the future generation of farmers. So, when the child is in the farm, there are some activities that he can do and some other activities that they can’t. He must assist. He look at his father working. And then the child keep it in his mind. So the child, during his free time, his holidays, must go to farm and see what his father is doing.” [ 65 ] (p. 8)

Krauss’ [ 73 ] household survey among Ghanaian parents and key informants, such as the Minister of Education, showed that top level policy makers are also influenced by these social norms. An indication that social norms on child labor cut across various strata of society. A quote from the Minister of Education in Ghana showed ways the social norm of succession influences child labor:

“…I belong to the old school, where you ‘bring up the child the way he should go’ so that if you are a child in a farming family you should be able to learn about farming from your parents…” [ 73 ] (p. 551)

The desire and commitment to uphold the norm of sustenance of family occupation is enforced by the notion that family occupations will collapse if children are not trained to assume and continue with it ( cf . [ 64 , 65 , 73 ]).

“Our family businesses will collapse if we take our children out of fishing. It is part of our culture for children to get deeply involved in what we (parents) do.” [ 62 ] (p. 11)

Themes related to the normative interpretation of child labor standards

Only 2 of the 13 articles reported evidence on the normative interpretations of child labor and related legislation or standards [ 61 , 66 ]. The finding discusses parents’ interpretations of the UNCRC sections on children’s active participation in decisions, and children’s rights. Evidence on the two themes is discussed below:

3.7. Obedience

Parents opposed the UNCRC commitment for children to be given the free will to make decisions and contribute to decisions that affect their lives [ 61 , 66 ]. Children’s rights to active participation in decisions were interpreted within the normative cultural framework of obedience and respect. Children’s active participation in decisions were considered among the potential practices that deviates from the cherished norm of obedience and respect of elders [ 61 , 66 ]. Children are culturally expected to obey the decisions of elders and take instructions from persons who are older than them, especially their parents. Thus, the power to make decisions within the family rest upon elders, who also have the cultural authority to make decisions for children [ 61 , 66 ].

“Ghanaian culture gives parents more power over their children. Thus, there is virtually no children’s rights to participation in family decisions since parents’ views on matters concerning the child carries a lot of weight. It is quite difficult for children to disobey their parents in matters relating to child labour.” [ 61 ] (p. 472)

Legitimacy of parents’ decision-making power and the social expectation of obedience influenced children’s acceptance and commitment to instructions from their parents [ 66 ]. Those who obey and submit to parent’s instructions, without questioning, are considered to be good-natured [ 64 , 66 ] and respectful children [ 71 ]. The incentives associated with being considered a well-natured child further strengthened children’s commitment to the belief that adults are better positioned to make decisions for children [ 71 ]. Additionally, the cost associated with being branded as a bad parent [ 61 ], and having your children considered as “wayward” [ 64 ] influenced parents’ conformity to the norm.

3.8. Child Rights in Child Labor

Broadly, Adonteng-Kissi’s [ 61 ] study explored parents’ and stakeholders’ opinion on children’s rights within the context of child labor in the Ghanaian cultural context. Collectively, parents agreed that a child’s right is a foreign concept that contravenes the social norms in Ghana, particularly the social norms that support child rearing practices. They argued that children’s rights spoil children and make parents powerless in their efforts to guide and nurture their children towards a successful future. They believe that engaging children in the works of their parents is not wrong, as that has been the practice since the inception of traditional communities. Evidence from the narratives of parents who involved their children in child labor revealed that government officials are reluctant to implement children’s rights and child labor related legislation, because they agree that child work is an old-aged practice that is good for children. Effective child support, interventions for struggling parents and strong government enforcement [ 61 ] were identified among the key resources and structures required to ensure the effective adoption and implementation of children’s rights to end child labor in Ghana. The lack of these important requirements makes children’s rights unfit for the local Ghanaian context. It was suggested that the social norm that spells out the need for children to work and complement family income may change if there are adequate social interventions to support child rearing and family wellbeing. The lack of such interventions makes child rights meaningless in the local context. Citing western countries, the parents believe that child rights have worked in such contexts due to the existence of strong social interventions and legal structures that ensure compliance.

4. Discussion

This study systematically analyzed evidence from existing studies on the influence of culture and social norms in child labor. It further analyzed evidence on the normative interpretations of legislation and international standards that seek to abolish child labor practices. The findings, which have been categorized under six specific themes, are discussed within the context of cultural values that underpin the social normative interpretations.

4.1. Social Norms Precipitating Child Labor

A common theme from the studies suggests that social norms on informal apprenticeship training for children influence child labor practices in many contexts, including Africa, Europe and Asia. Child labor practice is strengthened by the cultural belief that involving children in informal training, either through family occupation or household chores, imbibes in them the spirit of hard work, strong work ethics and prepares them adequately to face life changes. Johansen [ 17 ] reports that there is an overriding acceptance of the belief that child labor and child work prepares children adequately for the future and makes them hard workers. Similar to the findings by Verner and Blunch [ 19 ], it is evident that parents are more willing to engage their children in work early to develop affection for work and good work ethics. It is therefore not surprising that children in Tajikistan were reported to start work as early as 4 years. The findings collectively highlight societies’ commitment to the social values of resilience and hard work. Values of resilience and hard work are influential in society, and considered cardinal components of common values that needs to be promoted [ 74 , 75 ]. However, the normative interpretations of these values, is found to be undesirable for some children. If children can only become hard workers when they start work early, or when they engage in child labor, then the relevance of hard work should be questioned. In the same vein, if resilience can only be achieved through child labor, then the value of resilience should be given a second thought. The findings is indicative of societies’ commitment to social values, which are instrumental for group membership [ 75 ] and survival. It also demonstrates that normative interpretations of these values, in terms of practices to achieve the values, differ and in some cases could be detrimental to the health and wellbeing of children (especially in the case of child labor). Although engaging children in farm work could be hazardous, parents may be compelled to send their children to work to ensure proper supervision and care. This may happen when there is no proper supervision for children at home, or when children could be at higher risk of experiencing violence at home. These adverse consequences, resulting from leaving children at home, may explain parents’ views on sending their children to farm.

On the surface, the values of resilience and hard work could lead to uncritical acceptance from people because they ultimately lead to success and wellbeing. This uncritical acceptance was evident in this study as children in some studies accepted their parents’ decisions to involve them in work, and considered child labor as a normal part of their development [ 67 , 70 ]. Normalization of child labor by children shows the intergenerational transmissions link of social norms that enforce child labor practices. Thus, it is important for interventions to target at breaking this intergenerational link, through a wholistic normative change intervention.

Some parents involved in the studies alluded to the influential role of gender norms in child labor. Gender norms and role specification informed child labor practices. It emerged that the acceptance of males as breadwinners, and females’ primary role of maintaining the family informed child labor decisions. As a result, most boys were found to engage in income generating works, such as cocoa farming, fishing and work in industries, whilst females were engaged more in domestic chores. The study by Delap [ 72 ] in Bangladesh found that boys who engaged in household chores were labeled as “women”. This social stigma reinforces the commitment to the gender norms as it introduces informal social control mechanisms. Evidence on gender norms in child labor also suggest that, overtime, child labor would be gender specific; whereby boys will engaged in income generating labor, with girls involved in household maintenance labor. If this preposition should hold, in the long run hazardous child labor and non-child labor would assume similar dimension [ 76 ].

Parents in the studies provided narratives that underlie the social norms on the economic value of children. Parents from rural and urban Ghana, South Africa, Tajikistan and Turkey [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 67 , 71 ] expressed the belief that children are traditionally mandated to work and contribute to family income. It emerged that certain occupations, such as fishing and farming, required the collective involvement of family members including children. There are specific tasks for children in such occupations. Evidence from the cross-continental studies mainly demonstrate the normative interpretation of childhood, which zoom into the long-standing debate on childhood and child labor [ 77 , 78 , 79 ]. Indeed, conceiving children to have economic value transgress the global accepted standards on childhood (contained in the UNCRC), which are mainly based on the Western conceptualization of childhood. These are imposed western standards; however socioeconomic improvements are needed to change values. The fact that the normative standards on the economic values of children is also accepted by children suggest that a different conception of childhood may be at work in such context. Viruru [ 79 ] has argued that the interaction between childhood and child labor is complex and this complexity could be fueled by cultural factors. Findings from the included studies show that the normative interpretation of the economic value of children undermines efforts to attain the global standards on childhood.

Children were likely to engage in child labor in a context where family occupations are commonly practiced. This is in line with the cultural commitment to ensure sustenance and succession of family occupations. Common occupations identified with child labor, such as farming and fishing, are traditionally defined as family occupations, which are required to be sustained and transcended onto the next generations. Involving children in work is a common pathway to ensure the sustenance of family occupation.

4.2. Normative Interpretation of Child Labor Standards

This review shows that children’s right to participate in decisions that affect their lives are interpreted within the normative framework of obedience and respect. Studies mainly from Ghana [ 61 , 66 ] have shown that children are not accorded the freedom to exercise their right to participation because child participation is culturally interpreted as measures that spoil children. Child participation could lead to children disrespecting adults, since the Ghanaian culture gives enormous power to parents and adults and expects children to listen to instructions from adults [ 51 , 53 ]. Child participation could also undermine the authority of adults and elders in the community. It can be argued that the normative interpretation of child participation right is part of the conscious cultural efforts to achieve the value of respect and obedience to authorities and parents.

Finally, children’s rights in general were considered by parents as alien and part of the measure that spoils the African child. It is argued that children’s rights are geared towards making parents less powerful in efforts to guide their children. However, the study did not specify types of rights that are alien to the African context and those that spoil children [ 66 ]. It is generally accepted that rights that empower the child and seek to make them independent contravenes the African culture, which promotes obedience and respect of elders’ decisions and instructions [ 80 , 81 , 82 ]. Such rights are deemed to challenge parents’ authority in the family. Yet, the African Charter on the Rights of the Child provides measures to promote children’s rights to decisions, participation and protection. This suggests that children’s rights may not be entirely foreign in the African context. Narratives from the parents confirmed that child work is an accepted pathway for children to build responsibility and independence. This may imply that the length of children’s involvement in work could vary by the socioeconomic differences within the family and community. In low-income families, children are forced to grow up quicker by taking on work and responsibilities, compared to children in middle-high income families where adolescence can be prolonged into the 20′s, varying by context and cultural differences.

4.3. Implication for Child Labor Practice and Research

Evidence discussed in this review has some implications for practiced measures that are required to eradicate child labor. The findings show that varied normative interpretations of key social values: respect and obedience, hard work, resilience, and sustenance and succession, influence child labor decisions. These negative normative interpretations are deep-rooted and legitimatized among children. A multi-pronged normative intervention program that seeks to change the negative normative interpretations is needed. In particular, a combination of normative change campaign with community education is needed to intensify education on the negative social norms. The education should aim at sensitizing communities to acknowledge the unfavorable outcomes of the existing normative interpretations of the common values and provide alternative justification/avenues communities can model into their accepted social standards. Children should not be left out in the normative change interventions because they appear to have legitimatized the negative interpretations that support child labor practices. Social sanctions should be instituted to control negative social norms and ensure conformity to the newly developed social standards. Modelling new social standards could be challenging. As a result, we advocate for a wholistic community approach that involves three stages: identification of the negative social norms on child labor, collectively develop alternative normative paths, and collectively develop implementation plans including social sanctions to ensure social control. Other important strategies that can help eliminate child labor include measures to promote access to school, increase school supplies, reduce transportation costs for students, and a conditional cash transfer program to stay in school. The school, health services and governmental programs can play a role in promoting children and parents’ understanding about the hazards and benefits of family’s work. Such holistic approach, involving efforts from the educational system, government, health and economic system (conditional cash transfer) will be useful to change the values and norms. It will help children and their families to appreciate the realities regarding how they are interpreting values/social norms and the impact on children.

A periodic evaluation of the child labor elimination interventions is needed to ensure that the adverse consequences are identified and curtailed ( cf . [ 83 ]). Child labor elimination programs may have hidden and undesired consequences of increasing child labor within poor communities [ 83 ]. These poor communities may develop alternative occupations/avenues, sometimes with poor conditions and incentive, because for some children work is the only means for survival. Therefore, it is important to supplement the social normative approach of eliminating child labor with an economic approach that provide incentives to poor families for them to develop alternative livelihoods.

Indeed, the acceptance of certain occupations, such as farming and fishing as family works, provide support for child labor practices. The normative change program should include measures that train communities to accept the unique career path of every child and the negative implications of forcing children into a supposed family occupation. Education should be acknowledged as the foundation not only for career in the formal sector but also relevant for those working in the informal sector. Technical and vocational education should be promoted as suitable alternatives for children whose parents deem them unfit for theory-oriented educational programs. Studies that seek to further explore the negative social norms and enable community members to provide alternative normative paths are desired. Intervention studies to change the negative social norms and model positive social norms is needed. A holistic assessment of the key promulgation in the UNCRC and ILO’s child labor standards in developing countries is needed to guide amendments and operationalizations within the local context.

4.4. Limitations

This study is not without limitations. Our search is limited to only English published academic articles on the subject. It is possible that relevant information on the social norms and child labor may be available in gray literature, including book chapters and reports. Even though we included the two big databases in the social sciences literature; Scopus and Web of Science, studies contained exclusively in other databases may be overlooked. We admit that some studies may have discussed the social norms in child labor without a strict use of the lingua or terminologies of norms, values, beliefs, culture, etc., and thus may have been mistakenly excluded from our review. The documented procedure will allow an updated review to be conducted. Throughout the manuscript we have adopted a loose definition of social norms “rules that is understood and shared by members of the social group (e.g., community) and guide behavior and decisions”. Our intention was to provide non-abstract level interpretations of the various means social norms that inform decisions including child labor. This approach and the way we have sought to argue about social normative interpretations vary slightly from the typical methods a classical cultural or anthropology researcher would use. This does not obliterate our utmost intention of this study, which is tied to practice. Furthermore, there was no pre-published protocol for this review.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review advances knowledge on social norms that influence decisions on child labor practices in the family. Findings from the included studies confirmed Parsons’ argument that uncritical acceptance of values as given could be detrimental to society. The findings showed that even though values of respect, hard work and inheritance are important, normative interpretations of them have tendencies of influencing child labor practices within the family. Norms on gender, inheritance and sustenance, value of education and the asset value of children are influential in parents’ decisions to involve their children in work/hard labor. The study findings provide directions for normative change programs targeting the negative interpretations of these values and social norms.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the China Medical Board Foundation (Grant number 21-396) for the funding support to cover the Article Processing Charge (APC).

Author Contributions

A.A. Conceptualized the problem, contributed to the literature review, data analysis and writing of manuscript. I.H. contributed to the conceptualization of the study, literature search, and writing of manuscript. C.R.E. contributed to the conceptualization of the research, he designed the search protocol, led the data analysis process, and wrote methods section. L.P.J. contributed to the conceptualization of the study, literature search, guided the review and discussion of findings. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research was funded by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and International Organization for Migration (IOM) through the “RTA seed grant” awarded to Alhassan Abdullah, and the APC was funded by the China Medical Board Foundation (Grant number 21-396).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations.

1 Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
2 Department of Sociology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA.
PMID: 35409766
PMCID: PMC8998633
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074082

Background: Research has established the family as the predominant context for child labor practices. Decisions to involve children in child labor within the family or by a family member (herein family child labor) is strongly motivated by cultural beliefs that normalize child labor. This systematic review sought to synthesize evidence on the social norms that support child labor practices, and the normative interpretation of international child labor legislation/standards.

Methods: We followed the PRISMA procedure for systematic review by reviewing empirical articles published between 2000 to 2021 and contained within the four key databases: Scopus, ISI Web of Sciences, PubMed and Embase. Findings from 13 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed thematically.

Results: The review included studies from three continents: Africa, Asia and Europe. Gender norms, informal apprenticeship norm, norms on succession and sustenance as well as obedience, were key social norms that influenced child labor practices in the family. Parents' decision to involve children in child labor was strongly influenced by the collective acceptance of some occupations (e.g., cocoa farming and fishing) as family occupations, which need to be preserved, undertaken and passed on to children. Child rights and the UNCRC principle of children's participation were considered foreign to most non-western countries and interpreted as contravention to the cherished social norm of obedience. The findings underlie the link between social norms and the common social values of resilience, hard work, and respect.

Conclusion: The results provide foundations and target to develop normative change intervention programs to re-orient the negative interpretations of common social values and provide alternative pathways that prevent child labor within the social context.

Keywords: child labor; child rights; child work; culture; family child labor; social norms.

Publication types

Systematic Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Child Labor*
Social Environment
Social Norms*
Social Values

Subject List
Take a Tour
For Authors
Subscriber Services
Publications
African American Studies
African Studies
American Literature
Anthropology
Architecture Planning and Preservation
Art History
Atlantic History
Biblical Studies
British and Irish Literature

Childhood Studies

Chinese Studies
Cinema and Media Studies
Communication
Criminology
Environmental Science
Evolutionary Biology
International Law
International Relations
Islamic Studies
Jewish Studies
Latin American Studies
Latino Studies
Linguistics
Literary and Critical Theory
Medieval Studies
Military History
Political Science
Public Health
Renaissance and Reformation
Social Work
Urban Studies
Victorian Literature
Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Child Labor

Introduction, general overviews.

Children’s Views on Child Labor
Asia and the Pacific
Latin America and the Caribbean
United States
Illustrations and Films
Analysis of Policy, Monitoring, Law Enforcement
Action and Campaigns against Child Labor

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

Agency and Childhood
Childhood and the Colonial Countryside
Indigenous Childhoods in India
Find more forthcoming articles...
Export Citations
Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Child Labor by Mary Lorena Kenny , Kathie Carpenter LAST REVIEWED: 25 April 2022 LAST MODIFIED: 25 April 2022 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0092

Approaches to research on child labor, and the development of appropriate action to combat it, have shifted in the past few decades. Children’s labor was previously considered “natural” as an inherent aspect of being poor, and rarely were their voices included in collection of data. Today, both quantitative and qualitative studies include first-person accounts to bolster their analysis. The umbrella term, “child labor,” has been disaggregated to order to highlight how context—gender, race, sexuality, urbanization and global shifts in labor and consumption, natural disasters—shape the nature, extent, interpretation, and representation of children’s work. Together with scholarship historicizing “childhood,” the family and household, and the ongoing efforts by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), a rich source of information is available to help navigate the complexity of children’s work and the significance it has for children, their families, and the world. Special acknowledgement: This entry has been updated by guest reviewer Dr. Kathie Carpenter, associate professor and department head of global studies, University of Oregon. Her expertise has proven invaluable to this article.

This is a suggestive, not exhaustive, list. It draws from the thousands of books, articles, government reports, essays, newspaper commentaries, dissertations, traveler accounts, photographs, and films produced by political, academic, and humanitarian agencies that describe, decry, and advocate against child labor. Economic transformations and policies create new forms of labor, migration, and consumption. Emphasis on child labor may be embedded in studies on street children , human trafficking and modern-day slavery, human rights, domestic labor, sex work, and illicit drug production and distribution. Simply defining child labor is complex and contested, as pointed out by the International Labour Organization (ILO; see “ What Is Child Labour ”). Included here are websites that provide broad overviews of the causes and consequences of child labor, brief essays on their sociocultural contexts, and efforts to eliminate child labor (Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking; International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour; Understanding Children’s Work; see Becker 2017 ). Important emerging research areas include child labor and health ( Kuimi, et al. 2018 ; Ibrahim, et al. 2019 ) and the impact of global environmental change on child labor ( Brashares, et al. 2014 ). Posso 2020 contains case studies by a range of specialists linking policy prescriptions to theoretical and empirical studies. The website for Children and Work Network contains up-to-date listings of events such as speaker series and webinars, as well as detailed, informative case studies. Two overviews ( Lesson Plan: Child Labor in America , Child Labor Public Education Project ) and UNICEF’s website on Child Labour provide materials suitable for teaching at K–12 levels as well as higher education.

Becker, Jo. “Child Labor.” In Campaigning for Children . By Jo Becker, 59–82. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017.

Uses case studies and storytelling to introduce the main issues surrounding child labor, including current challenges and considerations, and to document actions against it. Very accessible approach to complex issues.

Brashares, Justin S., Briana Abrahms, Kathryn J. Fiorella, et al. “Wildlife Decline and Social Conflict.” Science 345.6195 (2014): 376–377.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1256734

Shows how global environmental change is implicated in child labor, especially the worst forms. The pressure to exploit increasingly scarce wildlife while lowering production costs increases demand for labor. The authors argue against approaches that fail to address root causes, which are exacerbated by climate change.

Child Labor Public Education Project . University of Iowa Labor Center.

Comprehensive workshop materials for adults and K–12 students. Covers both historical and contemporary approaches. Includes activities and information sheets focused on causes and consequences from both US and international perspectives.

Child Labour . UNICEF.

Comprehensive overview of UNICEF’s child labor position and programming, with links to data, reports, and project descriptions. Written from an advocacy rather than academic perspective. Frequently updated, with sections on very current events, such as COVID-19 and child labor.

Children and Work Network .

A global group of researchers and practitioners dedicated to understanding and disseminating information about children’s work that is evidence based, informed by working children’s own experiences, and takes into account children’s overall well-being. Sponsors workshops, webinars, policy positions, and research series.

Ibrahim, Abdalla, Salma M. Abdalla, Mohammed Jafer, Jihad Abdelgadir, and Nanne de Vries. “Child Labor and Health: A Systematic Literature Review of the Impacts of Child Labor on Child’s Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” Journal of Public Health 41.1 (2019): 18–26.

DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy018

Review article linking child labor with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Concludes that current policy approaches are inadequate. Primary research recommendation is that more comparative and longitudinal studies are urgently needed in order to clarify causal relationships and suitable policy solutions.

Kuimi, Brice L. B., Oduro Oppong-Nkrumah, Jay Kaufman, Jose I. Nazif-Munoz, and Arijit Nandi. “Child Labor and Health: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Public Health 65.3 (2018): 663–672.

Review article noting strong correlation between poor health and child labor, but points out impossibility of determining causality due to lack of longitudinal studies. Highlights methodological problems, such as difficulty researching agricultural work, which is the greatest source of injuries because it often occurs within family context.

Lesson Plan: Child Labor in America . US Library of Congress.

Compiled by Joyce Kasman Valenza and Carl Atkinson, a complete unit on history of child labor in the United States, including primary-source material, activities, discussion topics, assignments, and teachers’ guides

Posso, Alberto, ed. Child Labor in the Developing World: Theory, Practice and Policy . Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3106-4

Edited volume with chapters analyzing causes and consequences of child labor in a range of regions and across a variety of sectors. Empirical grounding is used to inform policy analysis and make recommendations as well as provide new theoretical insights.

What Is Child Labour . International Labour Organization.

Presents ILO position on child labor, distinguishes between child labor and child work, and introduces the idea of “worst forms of child labor.” Provides links to other ILO information and positions on child labor. Includes a subheading on the International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) . IPEC is a clearinghouse for information on the nature and extent of child labor worldwide policies, laws, and action plans. Brief factsheets provide basic information on types of labor.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

About Childhood Studies »
Meet the Editorial Board »
Abduction of Children
Aboriginal Childhoods
Addams, Jane
ADHD, Sociological Perspectives on
Adolescence and Youth
Adolescent Consent to Medical Treatment
Adoption and Fostering
Adoption and Fostering, History of Cross-Country
Adoption and Fostering in Canada, History of
Advertising and Marketing, Psychological Approaches to
Advertising and Marketing, Sociocultural Approaches to
Africa, Children and Young People in
African American Children and Childhood
After-school Hours and Activities
Aggression across the Lifespan
Ancient Near and Middle East, Child Sacrifice in the
Animals, Children and
Animations, Comic Books, and Manga
Anthropology of Childhood
Archaeology of Childhood
Ariès, Philippe
Attachment in Children and Adolescents
Australia, History of Adoption and Fostering in
Australian Indigenous Contexts and Childhood Experiences
Autism, Females and
Autism, Medical Model Perspectives on
Autobiography and Childhood
Benjamin, Walter
Bereavement
Best Interest of the Child
Bioarchaeology of Childhood
Body, Children and the
Bourdieu, Pierre
Boy Scouts/Girl Guides
Boys and Fatherhood
Breastfeeding
Bronfenbrenner, Urie
Bruner, Jerome
Buddhist Views of Childhood
Byzantine Childhoods
Child and Adolescent Anger
Child Beauty Pageants
Child Homelessness
Child Mortality, Historical Perspectives on Infant and
Child Protection
Child Protection, Children, Neoliberalism, and
Child Public Health
Childcare Manuals
Childhood and Borders
Childhood and Empire
Childhood as Discourse
Childhood, Confucian Views of Children and
Childhood, Memory and
Childhood Studies and Leisure Studies
Childhood Studies in France
Childhood Studies, Interdisciplinarity in
Childhood Studies, Posthumanism and
Childhoods in the United States, Sports and
Children and Dance
Children and Film-Making
Children and Money
Children and Social Media
Children and Sport
Children and Sustainable Cities
Children as Language Brokers
Children as Perpetrators of Crime
Children, Code-switching and
Children in the Industrial Revolution
Children with Autism in a Brazilian Context
Children, Young People, and Architecture
Children's Humor
Children’s Museums
Children’s Parliaments
Children’s Reading Development and Instruction
Children's Views of Childhood
China, Japan, and Korea
China's One Child Policy
Citizenship
Civil Rights Movement and Desegregation
Classical World, Children in the
Clothes and Costume, Children’s
Colonial America, Child Witches in
Colonialism and Human Rights
Colonization and Nationalism
Color Symbolism and Child Development
Common World Childhoods
Competitiveness, Children and
Conceptual Development in Early Childhood
Congenital Disabilities
Constructivist Approaches to Childhood
Consumer Culture, Children and
Consumption, Child and Teen
Conversation Analysis and Research with Children
Critical Approaches to Children’s Work and the Concept of ...
Cultural psychology and human development
Debt and Financialization of Childhood
Discipline and Punishment
Discrimination
Disney, Walt
Divorce And Custody
Domestic Violence
Drawings, Children’s
Early Childhood
Early Childhood Care and Education, Selected History of
Eating disorders and obesity
Education: Learning and Schooling Worldwide
Environment, Children and the
Environmental Education and Children
Ethics in Research with Children
Europe (including Greece and Rome), Child Sacrifice in
Evolutionary Studies of Childhood
Family Meals
Fandom (Fan Studies)
Female Genital Cutting
Feminist New Materialist Approaches to Childhood Studies
Feral and "Wild" Children
Fetuses and Embryos
Films about Children
Films for Children
Folk Tales, Fairy Tales and
Foundlings and Abandoned Children
Freud, Anna
Freud, Sigmund
Friends and Peers: Psychological Perspectives
Froebel, Friedrich
Gay and Lesbian Parents
Gender and Childhood
Generations, The Concept of
Geographies, Children's
Gifted and Talented Children
Growing Up in the Digital Era
Hall, G. Stanley
Happiness in Children
Hindu Views of Childhood and Child Rearing
Hispanic Childhoods (U.S.)
Historical Approaches to Child Witches
History of Childhood in Canada
HIV/AIDS, Growing Up with
Homeschooling
Humor and Laughter
Images of Childhood, Adulthood, and Old Age in Children’s ...
Infancy and Ethnography
Infant Mortality in a Global Context
Innocence and Childhood
Institutional Care
Intercultural Learning and Teaching with Children
Islamic Views of Childhood
Japan, Childhood in
Juvenile Detention in the US
Klein, Melanie
Labor, Child
Learning, Language
Learning to Write
Legends, Contemporary
Literary Representations of Childhood
Literature, Children's
Love and Care in the Early Years
Magazines for Teenagers
Maltreatment, Child
Maria Montessori
Marxism and Childhood
Masculinities/Boyhood
Material Cultures of Western Childhoods
Mead, Margaret
Media, Children in the
Media Culture, Children's
Medieval and Anglo-Saxon Childhoods
Menstruation
Middle Childhood
Middle East
Miscarriage
Missionaries/Evangelism
Moral Development
Moral Panics
Multi-culturalism and Education
Music and Babies
Nation and Childhood
Native American and Aboriginal Canadian Childhood
New Reproductive Technologies and Assisted Conception
Nursery Rhymes
Organizations, Nongovernmental
Parental Gender Preferences, The Social Construction of
Pediatrics, History of
Peer Culture
Perspectives on Boys' Circumcision
Philosophy and Childhood
Piaget, Jean
Politics, Children and
Postcolonial Childhoods
Post-Modernism
Poverty, Rights, and Well-being, Child
Pre-Colombian Mesoamerica Childhoods
Premodern China, Conceptions of Childhood in
Prostitution and Pornography, Child
Psychoanalysis
Queer Theory and Childhood
Racism, Children and
Radio, Children, and Young People
Readers, Children as
Refugee and Displaced Children
Reimagining Early Childhood Education, Reconceptualizing a...
Relational Ontologies
Relational Pedagogies
Rights, Children’s
Risk and Resilience
School Shootings
Sex Education in the United States
Social and Cultural Capital of Childhood
Social Habitus in Childhood
Social Movements, Children's
Social Policy, Children and
Socialization and Child Rearing
Socio-cultural Perspectives on Children's Spirituality
Sociology of Childhood
South African Birth to Twenty Project
South Asia, History of Childhood in
Special Education
Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence
Spock, Benjamin
Sports and Organized Games
Street Children
Street Children And Brazil
Subcultures
Teenage Fathers
Teenage Pregnancy
The Bible and Children
The Harms and Prevention of Drugs and Alcohol on Children
The Spaces of Childhood
Theater for Children and Young People
Theories, Pedagogic
Transgender Children
Twins and Multiple Births
Unaccompanied Migrant Children
United Kingdom, History of Adoption and Fostering in the
United States, Schooling in the
Value of Children
Views of Childhood, Jewish and Christian
Violence, Children and
Visual Representations of Childhood
Voice, Participation, and Agency
Vygotsky, Lev and His Cultural-historical Approach to Deve...
Welfare Law in the United States, Child
Well-Being, Child
Witchcraft in the Contemporary World, Children and
Work and Apprenticeship, Children's
Young Carers
Young Children and Inclusion
Young Children’s Imagination
Young Lives
Young People, Alcohol, and Urban Life
Young People and Climate Activism
Young People and Disadvantaged Environments in Affluent Co...
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Accessibility

[66.249.64.20|193.7.198.129]
193.7.198.129

Search Menu
Advance articles
Editor's Choice
Supplements
Author Guidelines
Submission Site
Open Access
About Journal of Public Health
About the Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
Editorial Board
Self-Archiving Policy
Dispatch Dates
Advertising and Corporate Services
Journals Career Network
Journals on Oxford Academic
Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, methodology.

< Previous

Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries

Article contents
Figures & tables
Supplementary Data

Abdalla Ibrahim, Salma M Abdalla, Mohammed Jafer, Jihad Abdelgadir, Nanne de Vries, Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries, Journal of Public Health , Volume 41, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 18–26, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy018

Permissions Icon Permissions

To summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on physical and mental health.

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that included participants aged 18 years or less, conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and reported quantitative data. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and assessment of study quality.

A total of 25 studies were identified, the majority of which were cross-sectional. Child labor was found to be associated with a number of adverse health outcomes, including but not limited to poor growth, malnutrition, higher incidence of infectious and system-specific diseases, behavioral and emotional disorders, and decreased coping efficacy. Quality of included studies was rated as fair to good.

Child labor remains a major public health concern in LMICs, being associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Current efforts against child labor need to be revisited, at least in LMICs. Further studies following a longitudinal design, and using common methods to assess the health impact of child labor in different country contexts would inform policy making.

For decades, child labor has been an important global issue associated with inadequate educational opportunities, poverty and gender inequality. 1 Not all types of work carried out by children are considered child labor. Engagement of children or adolescents in work with no influence on their health and schooling is usually regarded positive. The International Labor Organization (ILO) describes child labor as ‘work that deprives children of their childhood, potential and dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development’. 2 This definition includes types of work that are mentally, physically, socially or morally harmful to children; or disrupts schooling.

The topic gained scientific attention with the industrial revolution. Research conducted in the UK, because of adverse outcomes in children, resulted in acts for child labor in 18 02. 3 Many countries followed the UK, in recognition of the associated health risks. The ILO took its first stance in 1973 by setting the minimum age for work. 4 Nevertheless, the ILO and other international organizations that target the issue failed to achieve goals. Child labor was part of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted by 191 nations in 20 00 5 to be achieved by 2015. Subsequently, child labor was included in the Sustainable Development Goals, 6 which explicitly calls for eradication of child labor by 2030.

Despite the reported decline in child labor from 1995 to 2000, it remains a major concern. In 2016, it was estimated that ~150 million children under the age of 14 are engaged in labor worldwide, with most of them working under circumstances that denies them a playful childhood and jeopardize their health. 7 Most working children are 11–14 years, but around 60 million are 5–11 years old. 7 There are no exact numbers of the distribution of child labor globally; however, available statistics show that 96% of child workers are in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 1

Research into the impacts of child labor suggests several associations between child labor and adverse health outcomes. Parker 1 reported that child labor is associated with certain exposures like silica in industries, and HIV infection in prostitution. Additionally, as child labor is associated with maternal illiteracy and poverty, children who work are more susceptible to malnutrition, 1 which predisposes them to various diseases.

A meta-analysis on the topic was published in 20 07. 8 However, authors reported only an association of child labor with higher mortality and morbidity than in the general population, without reporting individual outcome specific effects. 8 Another meta-analysis investigated the effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), including child labor, on health. They reported that ACEs are risk factors for many adverse health outcomes. 9

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that attempts to summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on both physical and mental health, based on specific outcomes. We review the most recent evidence on the health impacts of child labor in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to the World Bank classification. We provide an informative summary of current studies of the impacts of child labor, and reflect upon the progress of anti-child labor policies and laws.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Search was restricted to publications from year 1997 onwards. Only studies written in English were considered. Our search algorithm was [(‘child labor’ OR ‘child labor’ OR ‘working children’ OR ‘occupational health’ OR ‘Adolescent work’ OR ‘working adolescents’) AND (Health OR medical)]. The first third of the algorithm was assigned to titles/abstracts to ensure relevance of the studies retrieved, while the rest of the terms were not. On PubMed, we added […AND (poverty OR ‘low income’ OR ‘developing countries’)] to increase the specificity of results; otherwise, the search results were ~60 times more, with the majority of studies being irrelevant.

Study selection

Studies that met the following criteria were considered eligible: sample age 18 years or less; study was conducted in LMICs; and quantitative data was reported.

Two authors reviewed the titles obtained, a.o. to exclude studies related to ‘medical child labor’ as in childbirth. Abstracts of papers retained were reviewed, and subsequently full studies were assessed for inclusion criteria. Two authors assessed the quality of studies using Downs and Black tool for quality assessment. 10 The tool includes 27 items, yet not all items fit every study. In such cases, we used only relevant items. Total score was the number of items positively evaluated. Studies were ranked accordingly (poor, fair, good) (Table 1 ).

Characteristics of studies included

* The quality is based on the percentage of Downs and Black 10 tool, < 50% = poor, 50–75% = fair, > 75% = good.

** BMI, body mass index.

*** HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

Data extraction and management

Two authors extracted the data using a standardized data extraction form. It included focus of study (i.e. physical and/or mental health), exposure (type of child labor), country of study, age group, gender, study design, reported measures (independent variables) and outcome measures (Table 1 ). The extraction form was piloted to ensure standardization of data collection. A third author then reviewed extracted data. Disagreements were solved by discussion.

Search results

A flow diagram (Fig. 1 ) shows the studies selection process. We retrieved 1050 studies on PubMed and 833 studies on Science Direct, with no duplicates in the search results. We also retrieved 23 studies through screening of the references, following the screening by title of retrieved studies. By reviewing title and abstract, 1879 studies were excluded. After full assessment of the remaining studies, 25 were included.

Study selection process.

Characteristics of included studies

Among the included studies ten documented only prevalence estimates of physical diseases, six documented mental and psychosocial health including abuse, and nine reported the prevalence of both mental and physical health impacts (Table 1 ). In total, 24 studies were conducted in one country; one study included data from the Living Standard Measurement Study of 83 LMIC. 8

In total, 12 studies compared outcomes between working children and a control group (Table 1 ). Concerning physical health, many studies reported the prevalence of general symptoms (fever, cough and stunting) or diseases (malnutrition, anemia and infectious diseases). Alternatively, some studies documented prevalence of illnesses or symptoms hypothesized to be associated with child labor (Table 1 ). The majority of studies focusing on physical health conducted clinical examination or collected blood samples.

Concerning mental and psychosocial health, the outcomes documented included abuse with its different forms, coping efficacy, emotional disturbances, mood and anxiety disorders. The outcomes were measured based on self-reporting and using validated measures, for example, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), in local languages.

The majority of studies were ranked as of ‘good quality’, with seven ranked ‘fair’ and one ranked ‘poor’ (Table 1 ). The majority of them also had mixed-gender samples, with only one study restricted to females. 24 In addition, valid measures were used in most studies (Table 1 ). Most studies did not examine the differences between genders.

Child labor and physical health

Fifteen studies examined physical health effects of child labor, including nutritional status, physical growth, work-related illnesses/symptoms, musculoskeletal pain, HIV infection, systematic symptoms, infectious diseases, tuberculosis and eyestrain. Eight studies measured physical health effects through clinical examination or blood samples, in addition to self-reported questionnaires. All studies in which a comparison group was used reported higher prevalence of physical diseases in the working children group.

Two studies were concerned with physical growth and development. A study conducted in Pakistan, 11 reported that child labor is associated with wasting, stunting and chronic malnutrition. A similar study conducted in India compared physical growth and genital development between working and non-working children and reported that child labor is associated with lower BMI, shorter stature and delayed genital development in working boys, while no significant differences were found among females. 12

Concerning work-related illnesses and injuries, a study conducted in Bangladesh reported that there is a statistically significant positive association between child labor and the probability to report any injury or illness, tiredness/exhaustion, body injury and other health problems. Number of hours worked and the probability of reporting injury and illness were positively correlated. Younger children were more likely to suffer from backaches and other health problems (infection, burns and lung diseases), while probability of reporting tiredness/exhaustion was greater in the oldest age group. Furthermore, the frequency of reporting any injury or illness increases with the number of hours worked, with significant variation across employment sectors. 13 A study in Iran reported that industrial workrooms were the most common place for injury (58.2%). Falling from heights or in horizontal surface was the most common mechanism of injury (44%). None of the patients was using a preventive device at the time of injury. Cuts (49.6%) were the most commonly reported injuries. 14

Other studies that investigated the prevalence of general symptoms in working children in Pakistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Indonesia reported that child labor is negatively associated with health. 15 – 19 Watery eyes, chronic cough and diarrhea were common findings, in addition to history of a major injury (permanent loss of an organ, hearing loss, bone fractures, permanent disability). 20 One study, conducted in India reported that working children suffered from anemia, gastrointestinal tract infections, vitamin deficiencies, respiratory tract infections, skin diseases and high prevalence of malnutrition. 21 Another study—of poor quality—in India reported that child labor was associated with higher incidence of infectious diseases compared to non-working children. 22

Only a few studies focused on specific diseases. A study in Brazil compared the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain between working and non-working children. Authors reported that the prevalence of pain in the neck, knee, wrist or hands, and upper back exceeded 15%. Workers in manufacturing had a significantly increased risk for musculoskeletal pain and back pain, while child workers in domestic services had 17% more musculoskeletal pain and 23% more back pain than non-workers. Awkward posture and heavy physical work were associated with musculoskeletal pain, while monotonous work, awkward posture and noise were associated with back pain. 23 A study in Nicaragua, which focused on children working in agriculture, reported that child labor in agriculture poses a serious threat to children’s health; specifically, acute pesticides poisoning. 24

A study conducted in India reported that the prevalence of eyestrain in child laborers was 25.9%, which was significantly more than the 12.4% prevalence in a comparison group. Prevalence was higher in boys and those who work more than 4 h daily. 25 Another study conducted in India documented that the difference between working and non-working children in the same area in respiratory morbidities (TB, hilar gland enlargement/calcification) was statistically significant. 26

A study in Iran explored the prevalence of viral infections (HIV, HCV and HBV) in working children. 27 The study reported that the prevalence among working street children was much higher than in general population. The 4.5% of children were HIV positive, 1.7% were hepatitis B positive and 2.6% hepatitis C positive. The likelihood of being HIV positive among working children of Tehran was increased by factors like having experience in trading sex, having parents who used drugs or parents infected with HCV.

Lastly, one study was a meta-analysis conducted on data of working children in 83 LMIC documented that child labor is significantly and positively related to adolescent mortality, to a population’s nutrition level, and to the presence of infectious diseases. 8

Child labor and mental health

Overall, all studies included, except one, 28 reported that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and/or behavioral disorders. In addition, all studies concluded that child labor is associated with one or more forms of abuse.

A study conducted in Jordan reported a significant difference in the level of coping efficacy and psychosocial health between working non-schooled children, working school children and non-working school children. Non-working school children had a better performance on the SDQ scale. Coping efficacy of working non-schooled children was lower than that of the other groups. 29

A study conducted in Pakistan reported that the prevalence of behavioral problems among working children was 9.8%. Peer problems were most prevalent, followed by problems of conduct. 30 A study from Ethiopia 31 reported that emotional and behavioral disorders are more common among working children. However, another study in Ethiopia 28 reported a lower prevalence of mental/behavioral disorders in child laborers compared to non-working children. The stark difference between these two studies could be due to the explanation provided by Alem et al. , i.e. that their findings could have been tampered by selection bias or healthy worker effect.

A study concerned with child abuse in Bangladesh reported that the prevalence of abuse and child exploitation was widespread. Boys were more exposed. Physical assault was higher towards younger children while other types were higher towards older ones. 32 A similar study conducted in Turkey documented that 62.5% of the child laborers were subjected to abuse at their workplaces; 21.8% physical, 53.6% emotional and 25.2% sexual, 100% were subjected to physical neglect and 28.7% were subjected to emotional neglect. 33

One study focused on sexual assault among working females in Nigeria. They reported that the sexual assault rate was 77.7%. In 38.6% of assault cases, the assailant was a customer. Girls who were younger than 12 years, had no formal education, worked for more than 8 h/day, or had two or more jobs were more likely to experience sexual assault. 34

Main findings of this study

Through a comprehensive systematic review, we conclude that child labor continues to be a major public health challenge. Child labor continues to be negatively associated with the physical and psychological health of children involved. Although no cause–effect relation can be established, as all studies included are cross-sectional, studies documented higher prevalence of different health issues in working children compared to control groups or general population.

This reflects a failure of policies not only to eliminate child labor, but also to make it safer. Although there is a decline in the number of working children, the quality of life of those still engaged in child labor seems to remain low.

Children engaged in labor have poor health status, which could be precipitated or aggravated by labor. Malnutrition and poor growth were reported to be highly prevalent among working children. On top of malnutrition, the nature of labor has its effects on child’s health. Most of the studies adjusted for the daily working hours. Long working hours have been associated with poorer physical outcomes. 18 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 35 It was also reported that the likelihood of being sexually abused increased with increasing working hours. 34 The different types and sectors of labor were found to be associated with different health outcomes as well. 13 , 18 , 24 However, comparing between the different types of labor was not possible due to lack of data.

The majority of studies concluded that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and behavioral disorders, as shown in the results. School attendance, family income and status, daily working hours and likelihood of abuse, in its different forms, were found to be associated with the mental health outcomes in working children. These findings are consistent with previous studies and research frameworks. 36

Child labor subjects children to abuse, whether verbally, physically or sexually which ultimately results in psychological disturbances and behavioral disorders. Moreover, peers and colleagues at work can affect the behavior of children, for example, smoking or drugs. The effects of child labor on psychological health can be long lasting and devastating to the future of children involved.

What is already known on this topic

Previous reviews have described different adverse health impacts of child labor. However, there were no previous attempts to review the collective health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to different risk factors, and the impacts of child labor are usually not limited to one illness. Initial evidence of these impacts was published in the 1920s. Since then, an increasing number of studies have used similar methods to assess the health impacts of child labor. Additionally, most of the studies are confined to a single country.

What this study adds

To our knowledge, this is the first review that provides a comprehensive summary of both the physical and mental health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to higher levels of physical and mental stress compared to non-working children and adults performing the same type of work. Unfortunately, the results show that these children are at risk of developing short and long-term health complications, physically or mentally.

Though previous systematic reviews conducted on the topic in 19 97 1 and 20 07 8 reported outcomes in different measures, our findings reflect similar severity of the health impacts of child labor. This should be alarming to organizations that set child labor as a target. We have not reviewed the policies targeting child labor here, yet our findings show that regardless of policies in place, further action is needed.

Most of the current literature about child labor follow a cross-sectional design, which although can reflect the health status of working children, it cannot establish cause–effect associations. This in turn affects strategies and policies that target child labor.

In addition, comparing the impacts of different labor types in different countries will provide useful information on how to proceed. Further research following a common approach in assessing child labor impacts in different countries is needed.

Limitations of this study

First, we acknowledge that all systematic reviews are subject to publication bias. Moreover, the databases used might introduce bias as most of the studies indexed by them are from industrialized countries. However, these databases were used for their known quality and to allow reproduction of the data. Finally, despite our recognition of the added value of meta-analytic methods, it was not possible to conduct one due to lack of a common definition for child labor, differences in inclusion and exclusion criteria, different measurements and different outcome measures. Nevertheless, to minimize bias, we employed rigorous search methods including an extensive and comprehensive search, and data extraction by two independent reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Parker DL . Child labor. The impact of economic exploitation on the health and welfare of children . Minn Med 1997 ; 80 : 10 – 2 .

Google Scholar

Hilowitz J . Child Labour: A Textbook for University Students . International Labour Office , 2004 .

Google Preview

Humphries J . Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution . Econ Hist Rev 2013 ; 66 ( 2 ): 395 – 418 .

Dahlén M . The negotiable child: the ILO child labour campaign 1919–1973. Diss . 2007 .

Sachs JD , McArthur JW . The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals . Lancet 2005 ; 365 ( 9456 ): 347 – 53 .

Griggs D et al. Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet . Nature 2013 ; 495 ( 7441 ): 305 – 7 .

UNICEF . The state of the world’s children 2016: a fair chance for every child. Technical Report, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 .

Roggero P , Mangiaterra V , Bustreo F et al. The health impact of child labor in developing countries: evidence from cross-country data . Am J Public Health 2007 ; 97 ( 2 ): 271 – 5 .

Hughes K , Bellis MA , Hardcastle KA et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Lancet Public Health 2017 ; 2 ( 8 ): e356 – 66 .

Downs SH , Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions . J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 ; 52 ( 6 ): 377 – 84 .

Ali M , Shahab S , Ushijima H et al. Street children in Pakistan: a situational analysis of social conditions and nutritional status . Soc Sci Med 2004 ; 59 ( 8 ): 1707 – 17 .

Ambadekar NN , Wahab SN , Zodpey SP et al. Effect of child labour on growth of children . Public Health 1999 ; 113 ( 6 ): 303 – 6 .

Ahmed S , Ray R . Health consequences of child labour in Bangladesh . Demogr Res 2014 ; 30 : 111 – 50 .

Hosseinpour M , Mohammadzadeh M , Atoofi M . Work-related injuries with child labor in Iran . Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014 ; 24 ( 01 ): 117 – 20 .

Mohammed ES , Ewis AA , Mahfouz EM . Child labor in a rural Egyptian community: an epidemiological study . Int J Public Health 2014 ; 59 ( 4 ): 637 – 44 .

Nuwayhid IA , Usta J , Makarem M et al. Health of children working in small urban industrial shops . Occup Environ Med 2005 ; 62 ( 2 ): 86 – 94 .

Wolff FC . Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000 . Econ Hum Biol 2008 ; 6 ( 1 ): 143 – 69 .

Hamdan-Mansour AM , Al-Gamal E , Sultan MK et al. Health status of working children in Jordan: comparison between working and nonworking children at schools and industrial sites . Open J Nurs 2013 ; 3 ( 01 ): 55 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A . Morbidity profile of child labor at gem polishing units of Jaipur, India . Int J Occup Environ Med 2014 ; 5 ( 3 ): 125 – 9 .

Khan H , Hameed A , Afridi AK . Study on child labour in automobile workshops of Peshawar, Pakistan, 2007 .

Banerjee SR , Bharati P , Vasulu TS et al. Whole time domestic child labor in metropolitan city of Kolkata, 2008 .

Daga AS , Working IN . Relative risk and prevalence of illness related to child labor in a rural block . Indian Pediatr 2000 ; 37 ( 12 ): 1359 – 60 .

Fassa AG , Facchini LA , Dall’Agnol MM et al. Child labor and musculoskeletal disorders: the Pelotas (Brazil) epidemiological survey . Public Health Rep 2005 ; 120 ( 6 ): 665 – 73 .

Corriols M , Aragón A . Child labor and acute pesticide poisoning in Nicaragua: failure to comply with children’s rights . Int J Occup Environ Health 2010 ; 16 ( 2 ): 175 – 82 .

Tiwari RR . Eyestrain in working children of footwear making units of Agra, India . Indian Pediatr 2013 ; 50 ( 4 ): 411 – 3 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A , Parikh JR . Respiratory morbidities among working children of gem polishing industries, India . Toxicol Ind Health 2009 ; 25 ( 1 ): 81 – 4 .

Foroughi M , Moayedi-Nia S , Shoghli A et al. Prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among street and labour children in Tehran, Iran . Sex Transm Infect 2016 ; 93 ( 6 ): 421 – 23 .

Alem AA , Zergaw A , Kebede D et al. Child labor and childhood behavioral and mental health problems in Ethiopia . Ethiopian J Health Dev 2006 ; 20 ( 2 ): 119 – 26 .

Al-Gamal E , Hamdan-Mansour AM , Matrouk R et al. The psychosocial impact of child labour in Jordan: a national study . Int J Psychol 2013 ; 48 ( 6 ): 1156 – 64 .

Bandeali S , Jawad A , Azmatullah A et al. Prevalence of behavioural and psychological problems in working children . J Pak Med Assoc 2008 ; 58 ( 6 ): 345 .

Fekadu D , Alem A , Hägglöf B . The prevalence of mental health problems in Ethiopian child laborers . J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006 Sep 1; 47 ( 9 ): 954 – 9 .

Hadi A . Child abuse among working children in rural Bangladesh: prevalence and determinants . Public Health 2000 ; 114 ( 5 ): 380 – 4 .

Öncü E , Kurt AÖ , Esenay FI et al. Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey . Child Abuse Negl 2013 ; 37 ( 5 ): 283 – 91 .

Audu B , Geidam A , Jarma H . Child labor and sexual assault among girls in Maiduguri, Nigeria . Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009 Jan 31; 104 ( 1 ): 64 – 7 .

Gross R , Landfried B , Herman S . Height and weight as a reflection of the nutritional situation of school-aged children working and living in the streets of Jakarta . Soc Sci Med 1996 Aug 1; 43 ( 4 ): 453 – 8 .

Woodhead M . Psychosocial impacts of child work: a framework for research, monitoring and intervention . Int J Child Rts 2004 ; 12 : 321 .

developing countries
mental health
child labor

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

Online ISSN 1741-3850
Print ISSN 1741-3842
Copyright © 2024 Faculty of Public Health
About Oxford Academic
Publish journals with us
University press partners
What we publish
New features
Open access
Institutional account management
Rights and permissions
Get help with access
Accessibility
Advertising
Media enquiries
Oxford University Press
Oxford Languages
University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
Cookie settings
Cookie policy
Privacy policy
Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics pp 1–29 Cite as

Child Labor and Economic Development

Eric V. Edmonds 2 &
Caroline Theoharides 3
Living reference work entry
First Online: 18 November 2021

1016 Accesses

7 Citations

2 Altmetric

Two hundred and eighteen million children work in the world today. Seventy percent are in activities classified as child labor under local laws. While in policy circles child labor is often viewed as a rights issue, it is also an economic issue. Working children are both a cause and a consequence of a lack of economic development. Widespread child employment dampers future economic growth through its negative impact on child development and depresses current growth by reducing unskilled wages and discouraging the adoption of skill-intensive technologies. Child employment also appears to result from a lack of economic growth. Rising incomes are associated with improvements in the family’s ability to triage economic shocks without child labor, shifts in production to outside of the home, and greater demand for education and leisure. These factors all lead to declines in the economic activity of children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Acemoglu D (2002) Technology and the labor market. J Econ Lit 40:7–72

Article Google Scholar

Acemoglu D (2007) Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica 75:1371–1470

Akresh R (2009) Flexibility of household structure: child fostering decisions in Burkina Faso. J Hum Resour 44(4):976–997

Google Scholar

Alam SA (2015) Parental health shocks, child labor and educational outcomes: evidence from Tanzania. J Health Econ 44:161–175

Alvi E, Dendir S (1998) Weathering the storms: credit receipt and child labor in the aftermath of the great floods (1998) in Bangladesh. World Dev 39(8):1398–1409

Attanasio O, Guarin A, Medina C, Meghir C (2017) Vocational training for disadvantaged youth in Colombia: a long-term follow-up. Am Econ J Appl Econ 9(2):131–143

Augsburg B, De Haas R, Harmgart H, Meghir C (2015) The impacts of microcredit: evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovinia. Am Econ J Appl Econ 7(1):183–203

Baland JM, Robinson JA (2000) Is child labor inefficient? J Polit Econ 108(4):663–679

Baldwin R, Martin P, Ottaviano GIP (2001) Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: the geography of growth take-offs. J Econ Growth 6:5–37

Bandara A, Dehejia R, Lavie-Rouse S (2015) The impact of income and non-income shocks on child labor: evidence from a panel survey of Tanzania. World Dev 67:218–237

Bandiera O, Burgess R, Das N, Gulesci S, Rasul I, Sulaiman M (2017) Labor markets and poverty in village economies. Q J Econ 132(2):811–870

Basu K (1999) Child labor: cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards. J Econ Lit 37(3):1083–1119

Basu K, Van PH (1998) The economics of child labor. Am Econ Rev 88(3):412–427

Basu K, Das S, Dutta B (2010) Child labor and household wealth: theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U. J Dev Econ 91(1):8–14

Beegle K, Dehejia RH, Gatti R (2006) Child labor and agricultural shocks. J Dev Econ 81(1):80–96

Benavot A (1983) The rise and decline of vocational education. Sociol Educ 56(2):63–76

Bharadwaj P, Lakdawala LK, Li N (2020) Perverse consequences of well intentioned regulation: evidence from India’s child labor ban. J Eur Econ Assoc 18(3):1158–1195

Bratti M, Mendola M (2014) Parental health and child schooling. J Health Econ 35:94–108

Brown M, Christiansen J, Philips P (1992) The decline of child labor in the US fruit and vegetable canning industry: law or economics? Bus Hist Rev 66(4):723–770

Caselli F, Coleman WJ II (2006) The world technology frontier. Am Econ Rev 96(3):499–522

Clemens MA, Lewis EG, Postel HM (2018) Immigration restrictions as active labor market policy: evidence from the Mexican bracero exclusion. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1468–1487

Cockburn J, Dostie B (2007) Child work and schooling: the role of household asset profiles and poverty in rural Ethiopia. J Afr Econ 16(4):519–563

Cogneau D, Jedwab R (2012) Commodity price shocks and child outcomes: the 1990 cocoa crisis in Côte d’Ivoire. Econ Dev Cult Chang 60(3):507–534

Dammert AC (2008) Child labor and schooling response to changes in coca production in rural Peru. J Dev Econ 86(1):164–180

Dammert AC, De Hoop J, Mvukiyehe E, Rosati FC (2018) Effects of public policy on child labor: current knowledge, gaps, and implications for program design. World Dev 110:104–123

de Hoop J, Rosati FC (2014) Cash transfers and child labor. World Bank Res Obs 29(2):202–234

de Hoop J, Groppo V, Handa S (2020) Cash transfers, microentrepreneurial activity, and child work: evidence from Malawi and Zambia. World Bank Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhz004

de Janvry A, Finan F, Sadoulet E, Vakis R (2006) Can conditional cash transfer programs serve as safety nets in keeping children at school and from working when exposed to shocks? J Dev Econ 79(2):349–373

De Silva I, Sumarto S (2015) How do educational transfers affect child labour supply and expenditures? Evidence from Indonesia of impact and flypaper effects. Oxf Dev Stud 43(4):483–507

DeGraff DS, Ferro AR, Levison D (2016) In Harm’s way: children’s work in risky occupations in Brazil. J Int Dev 28(4):447–472

Dehejia RH, Gatti R (2005) Child labor: the role of financial development and income variability across countries. Econ Dev Cult Chang 53(4):913–932

Dercon S (2002) Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. World Bank Res Obs 17(2):141–166

Dillon A (2013) Child labour and schooling responses to production and health shocks in Northern Mali. J Afr Econ 22(2):276–299

Doepke M, Zilibotti T (2009) International labor standards and the political economy of child labor regulation. J Eur Econ Assoc 7(2–3):508–518

Dollar D, Kraay A (2002) Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth 7(3):195–225

Dumas C (2013) Market imperfections and child labor. World Dev 42:127–142

Duryea S, Morales M (2011) Effects of the global financial crisis on Children’s school and employment outcomes in El Salvador. Dev Policy Rev 29(5):527–246

Duryea S, Lam D, Levison D (2007) Effects of economic shocks on children’s employment and schooling in Brazil. J Dev Econ 84(1):188–214

Edmonds EV (2005) Does child labor decline with improving economic status? J Hum Resour 40(1):77–99

Edmonds EV (2006) Child labor and schooling responses to anticipated income in South Africa. J Dev Econ 81(2):386–414

Edmonds EV (2007) Child labor. Handb Dev Econ 4:3607–3709

Edmonds EV (2008) Defining child labour: a review of the definitions of child labour in policy research. International Labor Organization, Geneva

Edmonds EV (2010a) Selection into worst forms of child labor. Res Labor Econ 31:1–33

Edmonds EV (2010b) Trade, child labor, and schooling in poor countries. In Trade adjustment costs in developing countries: impacts, determinants and policy responses, 179

Edmonds EV (2014) Does minimum age of employment regulation reduce child labor? IZA World Labor 73

Edmonds EV (2021) Globalization and the persistence of forced labor and child labor. In: Elliott K (ed) Handbook of globalization and labor standards. Elgar, Northampton, MA. forthcoming

Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N (2005a) The effect of trade liberalization on child labor. J Int Econ 65(2):401–419

Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N (2005b) Child labor in the global economy. J Econ Perspect 19(1):199–220

Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N (2006) Trade liberalization and the allocation of labor between households and markets in a poor country. J Int Econ 69(2):272–295

Edmonds EV, Schady N (2012) Poverty alleviation and child labor. Am Econ J Econ Pol 4(4):100–124

Edmonds EV, Shrestha M (2013) Independent child labor migrants. In: International handbook on the economics of migration. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Edmonds EV, Shrestha M (2014) You get what you pay for: schooling incentives and child labor. J Dev Econ 111:196–211

Edmonds EV, Theoharides C (2020) The short term impact of a productive asset transfer in families with child labor: experimental evidence from the Philippines. J Dev Econ 146

Edmonds EV, Turk C (2002) Child labor in transition in Vietnam, vol 2774. World Bank, Washington, DC

Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N, Topalova P (2010) Trade adjustment and human capital investments: evidence from Indian tariff reform. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(4):42–75

Emerson P, Souza AP (2003) Is there a child labor trap? Intergenerational persistence of child labor in Brazil. Econ Dev Cult Chang 51(2):375–398

Emerson P, Souza AP (2011) Is child labor harmful? The impact of working earlier in life on adult earnings. Econ Dev Cult Chang 59(2):345–385

Emerson P, Ponczek V, Souza AP (2017) Child labor and learning. Econ Dev Cult Chang 65(2):265–296

Emran MS, Robano V, Smith SC (2014) Assessing the frontiers of ultrapoverty reduction: evidence from challenging the frontiers of poverty reduction/targeting the ultra-poor, an innovative program in Bangladesh. Econ Dev Cult Chang 62(2):339–380

Fafchamps M, Shilpi F (2005) Cities and specialisation: evidence from South Asia. Econ J 115(503):477–504

Fafchamps M, Wahba J (2006) Child labor, urban proximity, and household composition. J Dev Econ 79(2):374–397

Fiszbein A, Schady N, Ferreira FHG, Grosh M, Kelleher N, Olinto P, Skoufias E (2009) Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. The International Bank for Recontruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington, DC

Book Google Scholar

Fitzsimons E, Mesnard A (2014) Can conditional cash transfers compensate for a Father’s absence? World Bank Econ Rev 28(3):467–491

Fors HC (2012) Child labour: a review of recent theory and evidence with policy implications. J Econ Surv 26(4):570–593

Francavilla F, Giannelli GC (2010) The employment of mothers in India. Int J Manpow 31(2):232–257

Friedberg R, Hunt J (1995) The impact of immigrants on host country wages, employment, and growth. J Econ Perspect 9:23–44

Fuller RG (1922) Child labor and child nature. Pedagog Seminary 29(1):44–63

Galor O, Weil D (2000) Population, technology and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am Econ Rev 90(4):806–828

Goodfriend M, McDermott J (1995) Early development. Am Econ Rev 85(1):116–133

Guarcello L, Lyon S, Rosati FC (2006) Child labour and education for all: an issue paper. Understanding children’s work programme working paper

Guarcello L, Lyon S, Rosati FC (2009) Household vulnerability and child labor: the effect of shocks, credit rationing, and insurance. J Popul Econ 23:169–198

Heim C, Nemeroff CB (2001) The role of childhood trauma in the neurobiology of mood and anxiety disorders: preclinical and clinical studies. Biol Psychiatry 49(2):1023–1039

Hornbeck R, Naidu S (2014) When the levee breaks: black migration and economic development in the American south. Am Econ Rev 103(3):963–990

Hossain M, Mullally CC, Ara J (2017) Asset transfers and child labor: evidence from a field experiment in Bangladesh. Working paper

International Labour Organization (2017) Global estimates of child labour: results and trends, 2012–2016. ILO: Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_575499.pdf

Islam A, Choe C (2013) Child labor and schooling responses to access to microcredit in rural Bangladesh. Econ Inq 51(1):46–61

Jacoby HG, Skoufias E (1997) Risk, financial markets, and human Capital in a Developing Country. Rev Econ Stud 64(3):311–335

Jafarey S, Lahiri S (2005) Food for education versus school quality: a comparison of policy options to reduce child labour. Can J Econ/Revue canadienne d’économique 38(2):394–419

Jalan J, Ravallion M (1999) Are the poor less well insured? Evidence on vulnerability to income risk in rural China. J Dev Econ 58(1):61–81

Johnston B, Mellor J (1961) The role of agriculture in economic development. Am Econ Rev 51:566–593

Kamei A (2018) Parental absence and agency: the household characteristics of hazardous forms of child labour in Nepal. J Int Dev 30(7):1116–1141

Kassouf AL, McKee M, Mossialos E (2001) Early entrance to the job market and its effect on adult health: evidence from Brazil. Health Policy Plan 16(1):21–28

Kelly M (1997) The dynamics of Smithian growth. Q J Econ 112:939–964

Kiley M (1999) The supply of skilled labour and skill-biased technological Progress. Econ J 109:709–724

Kis-Katos K, Sparrow R (2011) Child labor and trade liberalization in Indonesia. J Hum Resour 46(4):722–749

Kruger DI (2007) Coffee production effects on child labor and schooling in rural Brazil. J Dev Econ 82(2):448–463

Landmann A, Frolich M (2015) Can health-insurance help prevent child labor? An impact evaluation from Pakistan. J Health Econ 39:51–59

Levy V (1985) Cropping pattern, mechanization, child labor, and fertility behavior in a farming economy: rural Egypt. Econ Dev Cult Chang 33(4):777–791

Locay L (1990) Economic development and the division of production between households and markets. J Polit Econ 98(5):965–982

Manacorda M (2006) Child labor and the labor supply of other household members: evidence from 1920 America. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1788–1801

Marx K (1959) Das Kapital, a critique of political economy. H Regnery, Chicago

McKenzie D (2017) How effective are active labor market policies in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence. World Bank Res Obs 32(2):127–154

Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E (2004) Economic shocks and civil conflict: an instrumental variables approach. J Polit Econ 112:725–753

Moehling CM (1999) State child labor Laws and the decline of child labor. Explor Econ Hist 36(1):72–106

Nepal A, Nepal M (2012) Is child labour a substitute for adult labour? The relationship between child labour and adult illness in Nepal. Int Labour Rev 151(1–2):109–121

O’Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Rosati FC (2002) Child labour and health: evidence and research issues. Understanding children’s work programme working paper

Orazem P, Lee C (2010) Lifetime health consequences of child labor in Brazil. Res Labor Econ 31:90–133

Oreopoulus P, von Wachter T, Heisz A (2012) The short and long term career effects of graduating in a recession. Am Econ J Appl Econ 4(1):1–29

Pangburn W (1929) Play, the business of childhood. Am Child 29–31

Psacharopoulos G (1997) Child labor versus educational attainment: some evidence from Latin America. J Popul Econ 10(4):377–386

Punch S (2007) Negotiating migrant identities: young people in Bolivia and Argentina. Children’s Geograph 5(1–2):95–112

Ranjan P (2001) Credit constraints and the phenomenon of child labor. J Dev Econ 64(1):81–102

Ray R (2002) The determinants of child labour and child schooling in Ghana. J Afr Econ 11(4):561–590

Santos RJ (2018) Blessing and curse. The gold boom and local development in Colombia. World Dev 106:337–355

Sturrock S, Hodes M (2016) Child labour in low-and middle-income countries and its consequences for mental health: a systematic literature review of epidemiologic studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 25(12):1273–1286

Sulaiman M (2015) Does wealth increase affect school enrolment in ultra-poor households: evidence from an experiment in Bangaldesh. Enterprise Dev Microfinance 26(2):139–156

Sviatschi MM (2020) Making a Narco: childhood exposure to illegal labor markets and criminal life paths. Econometrica forthcoming

Theoharides C (2020) The unintended consequences of migration policy on origin-country labor market decisions. J Dev Econ 142:102271

Wahba J (2006) The influence of market wages and parental history on child labour and schooling in Egypt. J Popul Econ 19(4):823–852

Wyndick B (1999) The effect of microenterprise lending on child schooling in Guatemala. Econ Dev Cult Chang 47(4):853–869

Yang D (2008) International migration, remittances and household investment: evidence from Philippine migrants’ exchange rate shocks. Econ J 118(528):591–630

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA

Eric V. Edmonds

Department of Economics, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, USA

Caroline Theoharides

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric V. Edmonds .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

UNU-MERIT & Princeton University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Klaus F. Zimmermann

Section Editor information

Faculty Of Economics And Administration, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

M. Niaz Asadullah

Centre on Skills, Knowledge & Organisational Performance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Dept of Economics, University of Reading, Reading, UK

School of Education, Environment and Development (SEED),, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Edmonds, E.V., Theoharides, C. (2021). Child Labor and Economic Development. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_74-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_74-1

Received : 06 May 2021

Accepted : 07 July 2021

Published : 18 November 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-57365-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-57365-6

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Browse Econ Literature

Working papers
Software components
Book chapters
JEL classification

More features

Subscribe to new research

RePEc Biblio

Author registration.

Economics Virtual Seminar Calendar NEW!

Trade and Child Labor: A Review of Literature

Author & abstract
5 References
Most related
Related works & more

Corrections

Bilal Tariq
Rossazana Ab-Rahim

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher, references listed on ideas.

Follow serials, authors, keywords & more

Public profiles for Economics researchers

Various research rankings in Economics

RePEc Genealogy

Who was a student of whom, using RePEc

Curated articles & papers on economics topics

Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS

New papers by email

Subscribe to new additions to RePEc

EconAcademics

Blog aggregator for economics research

Cases of plagiarism in Economics

About RePEc

Initiative for open bibliographies in Economics

News about RePEc

Questions about IDEAS and RePEc

RePEc volunteers

Participating archives

Publishers indexing in RePEc

Privacy statement

Found an error or omission?

Opportunities to help RePEc

Get papers listed

Have your research listed on RePEc

Open a RePEc archive

Have your institution's/publisher's output listed on RePEc

Get RePEc data

Use data assembled by RePEc

Advancing social justice, promoting decent work

Ilo is a specialized agency of the united nations.

Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature

This paper reviews the rapidly-expanding literature on the relationships between child labour, education and health. With the renewed interest in child labour as an economic and social problem, researchers have attempted to assess its linkages to the core elements of human capital, hoping to solve continuing riddles in development policy and improve the quality of life for the world¿s poorest and most disadvantaged inhabitants.

International edition
Australia edition
Europe edition

Labour in a bind over much-needed childcare reform

Party is awaiting steer on what would be an expensive overhaul and is also keen to show commitment to fiscal restraint

Childcare in England failing and falling behind much of world, charity says

In a report, the Fawcett Society has drawn a conclusion that young parents are already familiar with: childcare in England is not working.

Compared with systems in Ireland, Estonia, France, Canada and Australia – all countries that have recently carried out or initiated major reforms – the English system is expensive, underfunded and unambitious.

Parents join lengthy waiting lists for nurseries. They have to fork out astronomical sums for basic childcare so they can return to work. Faced with this choice, many young mothers decide to drop out of the workforce to look after their children and avoid paying two-thirds of their salary for someone else to do so.

Labour and the Conservatives have cottoned on to the fact that childcare reform promises to boost the economy and the political fortunes of the party that achieves it. That has made childcare a key political battleground at the next election.

Since being appointed shadow education secretary, Bridget Phillipson has made this issue her number one priority. In a landmark speech in March last year, she promised to rip up the system in England, which she said was failing parents. Labour has asked David Bell, a former Ofsted chief and permanent secretary of the Department for Education, to carry out an in-depth review of the early years system.

Weeks after Phillipson’s speech, the government stole a march by announcing billions to extend childcare entitlements in its March 2023 budget. Starting this month, working parents of two-year-olds can claim 15 hours a week of free childcare during term time. This will apply to parents of nine-month-olds from September 2024 and increase to 30 hours a week from September 2025.

Experts have said this is a sticking-plaster solution, pumping money into a system that is struggling to cope with existing demand. Nurseries say they do not have the capacity to deliver the extra spaces needed.

Nonetheless, Labour is in a political bind. The party is awaiting the results of Bell’s review before deciding on childcare plan – but the Conservatives have already set out their policy. As a result, shadow ministers in broadcast studios are pelted with questions about whether they would keep the entitlements offered to parents by this government.

After some resistance, Labour has promised to honour the promised entitlements. Phillipson’s team insists the party is still is committed to root-and-branch reform of the system and will set out its plan after Bell’s review concludes.

But in the absence of any detail or even a timeline for the review’s conclusions, experts are concerned that reform will be kicked into the long grass. The fact that overhauling childcare would be expensive and Labour is keen to demonstrate its commitment to fiscal restraint makes it all the more difficult.

Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, promised last month that a Labour government would aim to borrow only to invest, echoing the fiscal rules of the former Labour chancellor Gordon Brown. She may well prove reluctant to commit Labour to spending any large sum on childcare reform in the run-up to the election.

“Women’s votes are essential to winning the next election, so we’re not surprised to see Labour commit to the entitlements that the government has set out, but alongside this we simply can’t afford for them not to undertake the wider reforms that are so badly needed,” said Alesha De-Freitas, the head of policy for the Fawcett Society. “We need to hear the party commit to reform as we approach an election.”

Economic policy
Early years education

KPMG Personalization

2024 Federal budget highlights

Canada's Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland delivered Canada's 2024 federal budget on April 16, 2024

Share Share close
Download 2024 Federal budget highlights pdf Opens in a new window
1000 Save this article to my library
View Print friendly version of this article Opens in a new window
Go to bottom of page
Home ›
Insights ›

The budget expects a deficit of $40.0 billion for 2023-24 and forecasts deficits of $39.8 billion for 2024-25, and $38.9 billion for 2025-26. Although the budget does not change the federal personal or corporate tax rates, Finance announced that it will increase the inclusion rate for capital gains realized on or after June 25, 2024, in certain circumstances. Specifically, the inclusion rate will increase to 2/3 for corporations and trusts and to 2/3 for individuals on the portion of capital gains realized in the year that exceed $250,000. Finance also provided details on related changes to increase the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption to $1.25 million, and clarified a temporary tax exemption on up to $10 million in capital gains that may be realized when a business is sold to an Employee Ownership Trust (EOT).

One of the major themes of this year’s budget is to increase the affordability of housing. In particular, the budget provides several incentives for purpose-built rental housing in Canada, including an elective exemption from the interest deductibility limitation and enhanced Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) for certain new additions of property. There are also new measures intended to benefit first-time homebuyers. Finance’s budget also focuses on clean economy changes, including to provide expected detail on the Clean Electricity investment tax credit, among others.

Download this edition of the TaxNewsFlash to learn more.

How new measures announced in this year’s budget may impact Canadians and businesses

KPMG in Canada provides the latest Canadian tax news and international tax news for you and your business

KPMG in Canada provides the latest Canadian and international tax news for your business

Quick tax information for corporations and individuals

IMAGES

(PDF) Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature
(PDF) Child Labor
Article Writing On Child Labour
Child labour
(PDF) Child Labour and Schooling in Developing Countries: A Review of
Child Labour In India

VIDEO

LITERATURE REVIEW HPEF7063 ACADEMIC WRITING FOR POSTGRADURATES
The Literature Review
LITERATURE REVIEW
For Literature Review and Reading| ጊዜዎን የሚቀጥብ ጠቃሚ AI Tool
EFFECTS OF CHILD LABOUR
Approaches to Literature Review

COMMENTS

Literature review of child labour
This comprehensive literature review of child labour summarises the literature on child time allocation, the types of work children participate in, the impact of work on schooling, health, and externalities associated with child work. It also considers the literature on the determinants of child time allocation (child labour) such as the ...
Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Child labor was part of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted by 191 nations in 20 00 5 to be achieved by 2015. Subsequently, child labor was included in the Sustainable Development Goals, 6 which explicitly calls for eradication of child labor by 2030. Despite the reported decline in child labor from 1995 to 2000, it remains a major concern.
Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review
This systematic review of existing literature seeks to examine the social norms that underpin child labor within the family in order to provide systematic evidence to inform research and intervention programs. 1.1. Social Norms, Child Work and Family Child Labor. Child labor in the family is a contested concept, especially in the context of ...
(PDF) A Survey of Literature on Child Labour
Jan 1996. T. N. Srinivasan. View. PDF | On Sep 20, 2016, Sarbajit Chaudhuri and others published A Survey of Literature on Child Labour | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate.
Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Child labor remains a major public health concern in LMICs, being associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. ... Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child's health in low- and middle-income countries J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Mar 1;41(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy018.
Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review
Results: The review included studies from three continents: Africa, Asia and Europe. Gender norms, informal apprenticeship norm, norms on succession and sustenance as well as obedience, were key social norms that influenced child labor practices in the family. Parents' decision to involve children in child labor was strongly influenced by the ...
Child labour and health: a systematic review
The population of interest for this review was all children under 18 years in LMICs, classified according to the World Bank Data Catalogue (WorldBank 2016).. The exposure was child labour, defined as paid or unpaid economic activity by children under 18 years of age either for family or outside the home (ILO 2011).The outcomes included were: injuries, nutritional outcomes (e.g. anaemia ...
Child Labour Consequences on Education and Health: A Review of Evidence
This literature review proposes to examine child labour's consequences and describe the complex, nuanced, and multidimensional relationship between child labour, schooling, and health outcomes. We focus on the key child outcomes affected by the performance of an economic activity during childhood and adolescence.
Child Labour: a Review of Recent Theory and Evidence With Policy
In recent years, a growing number of authors have turned their attention to the question of why children work. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the more recent theoretical and empirical research into the topic of child labour, and to illustrate the fact that no one factor on its own can account for the phenomenon of child labour.
Child Labor
"Child Labor and Health: A Systematic Literature Review of the Impacts of Child Labor on Child's Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries." Journal of Public Health 41.1 (2019): 18-26. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy018. Review article linking child labor with adverse physical and mental health outcomes.
Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Child labor was part of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted by 191 nations in 20 00 5 to be achieved by 2015. Subsequently, child labor was included in the Sustainable Development Goals, 6 which explicitly calls for eradication of child labor by 2030. Despite the reported decline in child labor from 1995 to 2000, it remains a major concern.
Child Labor and Economic Development
Prior to 2000, most of the child labor literature was theoretical, and Basu is still the most thorough discussion of theoretical research on child labor. Edmonds ... Fors HC (2012) Child labour: a review of recent theory and evidence with policy implications. J Econ Surv 26(4):570-593. Article Google Scholar
Child Labour: A Review of Recent Theory and Evidence with Policy
The above literature on gender and child labour fits primarily under the concept of agency, i.e. ... (1998) The economics of child labor. American Economic Review 88(3): 412-427. Basu, ...
Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review
Background. Research has established the family as the predominant context for child labor practices. Decisions to involve children in child labor within the family or by a family member (herein family child labor) is strongly motivated by cultural beliefs that normalize child labor. This systematic review sought to synthesize evidence on the social norms that support child labor practices ...
Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature
Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature / International Labour Office - Geneva: ILO, 2008 ISBN: 978-92-2-121849-4 (print); 978-92-2-121850- (Web PDF) International Labour Office
Understanding the role of structural factors and realities in
2. Literature review. Child labour is a contentious issue for which there is no universal definition. Commonly, child labour is defined as labour that robs children of their formative childhood and dignity and harms their physical and mental health (ILO, Citation 2018).ILO's definition of child labour is primarily statistical and includes the following terms: "age of the child," "the ...
Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature
This paper reviews the rapidly-expanding literature on the relationships between child labour, education and health. With the renewed interest in child labour as an economic and social problem, researchers have attempted to assess its linkages to the core elements of human capital, hoping to solve continuing riddles in development policy and improve the quality of life for the world¿s poorest ...
Trade and Child Labor: A Review of Literature
Bilal Tariq & Rossazana Ab-Rahim, 2020. " Trade and Child Labor: A Review of Literature ," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10 (1), pages 1740-1740, December. Downloadable! Employed child or working child is known as child labor in literature. The child labor is an important issue for economic analysts ...
Child labour, education and health: A review of the literature
Share this content. This paper reviews the rapidly-expanding literature on the relationships between child labour, education and health. With the renewed interest in child labour as an economic and social problem, researchers have attempted to assess its linkages to the core elements of human capital, hoping to solve continuing riddles in ...
PDF Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Objective To summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on physical and mental health. Methods We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that included participants aged 18 years or less, conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and reported quantitative data. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction ...
(PDF) Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the
To this end, a scoping review was conducted to (a) synthesize emerging themes and results from recent research on child labor during the COVID-19 pandemic, (b) identify factors that increase the ...
Labour in a bind over much-needed childcare reform
Labour has asked David Bell, a former Ofsted chief and permanent secretary of the Department for Education, to carry out an in-depth review of the early years system. Weeks after Phillipson's ...
Trade and Child Labor: A Review of Literature
Employed child or working child is known as child labor in literature. The child labor is an important issue for economic analysts, governments and social groups. The awareness of the exploitation ...
2024 Federal budget highlights
The budget expects a deficit of $40.0 billion for 2023-24 and forecasts deficits of $39.8 billion for 2024-25, and $38.9 billion for 2025-26. Although the budget does not change the federal personal or corporate tax rates, Finance announced that it will increase the inclusion rate for capital gains realized on or after June 25, 2024, in certain circumstances.
Police to review Tory MP's alleged misuse of funds after Labour complaint
Police have launched a review into whether a Tory MP misused campaign funds after receiving a complaint from the Labour Party.. Mark Menzies, the MP for Fylde, is alleged to have used £14,000 ...

Literature review of child labour

Related News

Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review

Inès Huynh

1. Introduction

1.1. Social Norms, Child Work and Family Child Labor

1.2. Social Norms and Legislation on Child Labor

2.1. Search Strategy

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

2.3. Search Outcomes and Screening

2.4. Quality Appraisal

2.5. Analysis Procedure

3.1. Study Characteristics

3.2. Informal Apprenticeship Norm

3.3. Gender Norm

3.4. Asset Value of Children

3.5. Value of Formal Education

3.6. Sustenance and Succession of Family Occupation

3.7. Obedience

3.8. Child Rights in Child Labor

4. Discussion

4.1. Social Norms Precipitating Child Labor

4.2. Normative Interpretation of Child Labor Standards

4.3. Implication for Child Labor Practice and Research

4.4. Limitations

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Institutional Review Board Statement

Social Norms and Family Child Labor: A Systematic Literature Review

Publication types

Childhood Studies

How to Subscribe

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Child Labor

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

Other Subject Areas

Child Labor by Mary Lorena Kenny , Kathie Carpenter LAST REVIEWED: 25 April 2022 LAST MODIFIED: 25 April 2022 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0092

Article Contents

Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries

Search strategy

Study selection

Data extraction and management

Search results

Characteristics of included studies

Child labor and physical health

Child labor and mental health

Main findings of this study

What is already known on this topic

What this study adds

Limitations of this study

Compliance with ethical standards

Email alerts

Affiliations

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Child Labor and Economic Development

Author information

Corresponding author

Editor information

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Download citation

Browse Econ Literature

More features

RePEc Biblio

Trade and Child Labor: A Review of Literature

Corrections

Suggested Citation

RePEc Genealogy

New papers by email

EconAcademics

About RePEc

Participating archives

Privacy statement

Get papers listed

Open a RePEc archive

Get RePEc data

Advancing social justice, promoting decent work

Labour in a bind over much-needed childcare reform