assignment marks 2020

Student Login

Entrance Exam
Returned Grade Card
Revaluation
Hall Ticket/Admit Card
Community College

Employee Section

Mail Service

Regional Network

RC Services

SOUs/Other Institutions

IGNOU Credit Society

Empanelled Hospitals

University House Allotment

Jobs at IGNOU

Recruitment at IGNOU

Tenders of IGNOU

Telephone Directory

Complaint Against Caste Discrimination

Committee Against Sexual Harassment

IGNOU-SAMARTH Portal

IGNOU-SAMARTH User Manual
LTC Advance/Intimation Form
LTC Claim Form

Student Section

Common Prospectus

Podcast Link

IGNOU UDYAMI

IGNOU Online Programmes

Student Grievances

Study Material Status

E-Newsletter

Study Material Catalogue

Placement Assistance

International Students

IGNOU Online

Online Payment for miscellaneous fees

FAQs for Promotion Scheme

Notification on Ragging

Equal Opportunity Cell(EOC)

Swayamprabha Channels(Video Telecast)

Student Section II

Frequently Useful Links

Daily Schedule of Videos Telecast for Swayamprabha Channels

Audio Resources of EMPC

Video Resources of EMPC

Schedule of Gyandarshan channels

Subscribe for Updates

[Updated on 26-Mar-2024]

Track Order

Nov 29, 2020

IGNOU Assignment Status not Updated? Do this

Many of the RCs have now started to update the IGNOU Assignment Status and Marks Online for most recent session June 2020 so candidates are advised to do check their Assignment status regular to get their assignment marks and results as soon as possible.

Your assignment status or marks for TEE June 2020 will be uploaded with the TEE June 2020 Result so keep checking the assignment status regularly for future updates. If you just submitted the IGNOU Assignment for session December 2020 to your study centre or through online mode then you have to wait for some time to get updated your assignment status and marks online for the current session.

We have answered a few important questions you may have had regarding your assignment submission:

When will my Assignment Status gets updated online?

Once Evaluator has successfully evaluated your assignment then they will upload your marks on IGNOU site and it can be seen by each student to get their report. You can get your Marks, Status, Grades, and Results of your Assignments from here. Generally, Assignment marks updating and uploading within 40 days after submission to the concerned study centre.

How to Check IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks & Result 2020?

Many of the students are getting confused for checking their assignment status & marks online after submission of their assignments to the study centre which they prepare with their hard work. We have made the process easier for students to find their assignment status, marks &result in one place.

The candidate just needs to click on the following link to go to the main page of the assignment status section. After coming to the section, you need to enter your 9 digit enrolment number and select your program code from the list and click on submit to get your assignment status on your screen.

IGNOU Assignment status may take some time to get updated online so candidates are requested to keep check their status regularly to find their assignment marks from here. In some cases, the study centre first evaluates the assignment, after evaluation, they send the marks to the regional centre and then the concerned authority at RC uploads the marks online which definitely takes some time.

What If My Assignment Status is not Updated?

Sometimes the update process of IGNOU Assignment status gets delayed for an unknown reason like the evaluation of assignments are delayed in the concerned study centre or maybe the regional centre has not uploaded your assignment marks online. Candidates can wait till the declaration of result to get updates of their assignment but if you are not able to find your assignment status or marks even after the release of TEE Result then you need to connect with centre at where you submitted your assignments.

In most of the cases, candidates have to visit their IGNOU Study Centre and complain to the coordinator of centre to get updates regarding your pending assignment marks and status. Please keep the copy of the grade card and don't forget the receipt of assignment which you received while submission of assignments. Once you followed the given instructions, you will get your assignment marks updated online.

Can we help you with something? Post your comment below and our experts will get back to you in no time. All the best!

Comentários

18 March 2024 Assignments Marks 2022 Semester 1: Civil & QS
12 March 2024 Assignments Marks 2022 Semester 1: Electrical
04 March 2024 Assignments Marks 2022 Semester 1: Mechanical & BSE
29 February 2024 Canteen Tender Notice
28 February 2024 Updated: Hostel Selected List-Final Year (Boys and Girls)

Assignments Marks 2020 Semester 2 Year 2 & 3 : All Courses

Click to dowload the assignments marks.

Electrical 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

Electrical 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

Civil 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

Civil 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

Mecahnical 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Maarks

Mecahnical 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Maarks

BSE 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

BSE 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

QS 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks

IGNOU Assignment Status 2020: Dates, Submission, Marks and Results

July 14, 2019
Posted by: Archana
Category: Article

IGNOU Assignment Status 2019: Dates, Submission, Marks and Results

IGNOU Assignment Status | Download IGNOU Assignments | IGNOU Solved Assignment | IGNOU Assignment Marks | IGNOU Assignment Result | IGNOU Assignment Submission

Candidates who have taken admission in IGNOU or enrolled in any course with Indira Gandhi National Open University must have to submit the IGNOU Assignment timely to qualify the term-end exams. IGNOU has the provision to check the assignment status of IGNOU 2020 online after the submission.

IGNOU Assignment Status ensures that whether the submitted assignments by the candidates are accepted or rejected. All the candidates who are enrolled in any undergraduate and postgraduate courses are advised to check the IGNOU Assignment Status 2020 online.

Candidates need to enter their enrollment number, code of the program, and date of birth to check the IGNOU Assignment Status. They are advised to keep ready these credentials while checking the status of IGNOU Assignment.

Assignment submission is a very important part of the qualification of a course or program because the marks of the IGNOU Assignment will be added in the final percentage. That’s why candidates have to check the status of their assignments so that they are aware of the final grade.

To get a degree from the university, candidates have to appear, qualify and score minimum passing marks in both assignments and term-end examinations. Students also have to download their IGNOU Date Sheet to get to know about Exam Date and Timings. Candidates are also advised to carry their IGNOU Hall Ticket with the IGNOU Identity card at the examination centre.

Let’s find out how you can get all the details related to IGNOU Assignment like IGNOU Assignment Status, Download IGNOU Assignment, IGNOU Assignment last date , IGNOU Solved Assignment, IGNOU Assignment Result etc.

IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks and Results 2020

IGNOU Assignments will be submitted to the coordinator of the regional centre of IGNOU. Candidate can download the assignments from the official website of IGNOU for their applied course.

IGNOU Assignment Last Date

Candidates can go through these important dates to submit the projects and assignments before the deadlines and also stay updated with necessary coursework. IGNOU Assignment submission last date will be updated on the official website of IGNOU. You can keep regularly visiting the website and checking the announcements section of IGNOU.

Important Dates of Submission of IGNOU Assignment

Ignou assignment submission.

To qualify the term-end exams candidates have to submit IGNOU Assignments to their respective IGNOU regional centre. Students have to follow all the criteria and procedures to submit the assignments.

To submit the IGNOU Assignments candidates have to download the assignment questions and answer them properly in their language. Candidates are advised to not copy the answers of assignments as it could be a reason of rejection of Assignments from IGNOU.

How to Download IGNOU assignments

IGNOU assignments are available on the official website of IGNOU. Candidates are advised to follow the below-given steps to download IGNOU Assignments.

Visit official website of IGNOU Assignments.
Click on the link of your particular applied course or programme with the Subject.
Then click on the link of First year or Second year in any medium English or Hindi.
After that, Click on Download button in the top right corner and Save/Print for future reference.

How to Submit IGNOU 2020 Assignments

After downloading the assignments, Students should have to prepare it and also mention their personal details to verify the students. Candidates have to download the assignment form the official website of IGNOU. Candidates can also find the IGNOU assignments on their IGNOU Regional Centre. IGNOU assignment also sent to students by speed post/registered courier from the university if they want it.

Students can see the submission date which is mentioned in the downloaded IGNOU assignment.
Candidates have to prepare their assignments before the deadline and should not forget to mention their name, enrolment number, address, and study center at the front page of IGNOU assignment.
Then Candidates have to submit their prepared assignments to their respective IGNOU Regional Centre. Before submitting, assignments candidates should have to find out their IGNOU Regional Center.
After the Submission of IGNOU assignments candidates have to ask their HODs for slips signed by the HOD and also ask them to mention these details such as the name of the course, enrolment number, and date of submission. Students have to save this slip for future preferences.
Candidates should also have to keep the photocopy of their assignments which should be attested by their IGNOU study centre.

IGNOU Assignment Status

IGNOU provides the facility to Students to check their IGNOU assignments online. They can check the IGNOU 2020 assignment status whether the IGNOU Assignment 2020 is accepted or rejected.

How to check IGNOU Assignment Status

Candidate can check their assignment status of IGNOU 2020 in two ways which are given below. They just have to enter their IGNOU enrollment number and Programme code.

Visit Official Website of IGNOU .
Now, Enter your enrollment number, programme, and Date of Birth in the Enrolled Students Section.
Then Click on the Login button
Now Students details will appear on the screen.
After that, click on Assignment Submission Status at the bottom of the page.
Now you can see all the details of the students such as number of assignments submitted, session, date of submission, and status (received and in-process/received and to be processed/check IGNOU grade card status for details).
After that, Student can Save/Print of IGNOU assignment status for future references.
Go to the link of Assignment Status of IGNOU 2020.
Now you have to enter your nine digit enrollment number and Select the Programme Code.
Click on Submit Button.
After that, IGNOU 2020 assignment status displayed on the screen.
Student can Save/Print of IGNOU assignment submission status for future references.

Details Mentioned on IGNOU 2020 Assignment Status

Enrollment Number
Programme Name
Code of the courses
Status of the Assignments
Date of submission of assignments

What to do if “IGNOU Assignment Status not completed” Shows

University takes time to update the IGNOU assignment status. Candidates can check their status after 20 to 25 days after submission of IGNOU assignment to the IGNOU study centre. Marks of the assignment will be updated before TEE results.

While checking the status if IGNOU Assignment Status will be shown “not completed” that means that student has been failed in the assignment. In this situation, candidates have to prepare IGNOU Assignments again and submit it to IGNOU Regional Centre.

IGNOU Solved Assignment

Students spend their lot of time to find the solution to the assignments. That’s why we have listed out some assignments which have mandatory to qualify the term-end exams.

IGNOU is very strict about the assignments that’s why you have to write the answers of the assignment questions in your own way. These Solved IGNOU Assignments will help students to give the idea about the answers and they have to make new answers to that question.

If they copied the Assignments from these solved assignments then your assignments will be rejected from the IGNOU university.

You have to work hard on your answers and give the best answers before submitting the assignments to the coordinator of the regional centre for the evaluation.

Click here for the IGNOU Solved Assignment for all academic courses.

IGNOU Assignment Result

IGNOU assignment Result will be updated in the IGNOU Grade Card . It’s not announced separately on the website of IGNOU. Students can also check IGNOU Grade Card Status on the official website of IGNOU.

Candidates who have submitted their IGNOU Assignments before Term-end exam(TEE) can check IGNOU Assignment Status 2020 online.

But IGNOU assignment status would not contain the marks of the Assignments it only shows the status of the IGNO

uAssignments whether it is accepted or rejected by the university.

So, Candidate does not have to put extra efforts online to check the IGNOU assignments Marks or Result.

How to Download IGNOU Assignment Result Grade Card

Candidates can follow the steps of Download IGNOU Grade Card to check the IGNOU Assignment result. They can check their grade card in IGNOU Student Zone to see the IGNOU Result and marks of the IGNOU assignments 2020.

Visit Official Website of IGNOU.
Click on Student Support and then Click on Student Zone.
Then Click on Results.
Now Choose the option Grade Card from the left side of the page.
You can Click on links related to your course. If you are enrolled in other programs then click on other programme option.
After clicking on any link, a new page will be open.
Now you have to select your program and enter your enrollment number and click on Submit.
After that, You can see your grade card of IGNOU on the screen.

IGNOU Assignment Marks

To pass or qualify the Term-end Exam of a particular applied course, Candidate has to obtain minimum 40 Marks out of 100 Marks. These marks are applicable to all academic courses offered by IGNOU. Candidate can check their assignment status and IGNOU result on the official website of IGNOU.

Reasons for grade card status shows “Not Completed”?

While checking the status of IGNOU Assignment, Candidates find two types of status “completed” and “Not Completed“. If Status shows “completed” then you have passed the assignment and get passing marks in IGNOU grade card.

But if Status shows “Not Completed“ then you must have to be worried because you have failed in your final examination. There may be reasons behind the rejection of your IGNOU Assignments. Here we have listed some reasons that could be a reason for showing your status “Not Completed”. Check it out:

You have not submitted your assignment on time. Candidates should have to submit the assignments before the deadline as we have talked above.
Candidates do not appear in their all practical examinations. You can your IGNOU study centre for your practical examinations.
You also have to make sure that you have submitted your projects and Dissertations before the deadline which has been compulsory to qualify the term end examinations.
If candidates failed in term end examinations then it also could be a reason for Rejection of IGNOU assignment.
Your course and programmes have been expired which is dependent on your programme. Because every programme has a different validity period.

Importance of IGNOU Assignment

IGNOU Assignment is the crucial part of qualifying the examination in IGNOU University. A candidate has to submit Assignments to the IGNOU regional centre before the deadline otherwise they consider failure in final results.

Candidates have to obtain 50%marks to qualify the final or term end examination. IGNOU assignment marks are included in the term end exam marks. If any candidates did not submit their assignments due to any reason they will fail in final exam results and status of grade card will be shown fail.

How to Submit IGNOU Assignments : IGNOU Assignment Status

Important Instructions related to IGNOU Assignment Status 2020

Candidates have to submit their assignments before the deadline which is mentioned on the IGNOU Assignments.
Candidates should have to take patience because the university takes time to update the status of IGNOU Assignments. If candidates found out their assignment status of IGNOU 2020 ‘not found’ or ‘not submitted’ then they don’t have to worry it will be updated by the university after some time. But if the status of IGNOU assignment remains the same for a long period of time then students have to contact IGNOU regional centre .
Candidates are advised to submit their assignments on time to gain positive IGNOU assignment status and get their degree without any problem.
Candidates have to gain at least 50% marks in assignment to pass which is applicable only when the status of IGNOU assignments in the grade card will show “completed”. If the status of assignments shows “Not completed” that means that student has been failed in the assignment and candidate have to again submit the assignment.

IGNOU Assignment Status - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Ques: which credentials do you need to check ignou 2020 assignment status.

Ans: Candidates have to enter their enrolment number, date of birth, programme and captcha code to login into their account and check their IGNOU assignment status. Those candidates who have submitted their assignments to IGNOU can only check the IGNOU assignment status.

Ques: What is the meaning of ‘not-complete’ assignment status in the IGNOU grade card?

Ans: ‘Not-complete’ assignment status means that candidates did not score minimum passing marks in IGNOU Assignments and failed in IGNOU assignment. Then candidates have to submit the IGNOU assignments again to the university.

Ques: What is the pass mark of IGNOU Assignment?

Ans: The passing marks of IGNOU Assignment in any subject is 50% that means candidates should have to obtain at least 50 marks. If candidates score marks below 50% in their assignment then they have to submit the assignment again. In the Final Grade card or Result, weightage of the assignments marks are 30% and Term end exam marks are 70%.

Ques: If IGNOU assignment status 2020 is not yet updated then what to do?

Ans: IGNOU assignment status update takes time up to 20-25 days. Candidates only have the option to wait for some time. If candidates find that IGNOU assignment status is not updated from so long, then they can contact regional centre officials immediately.

Ques: After how many days IGNOU assignment status 2020 will be updated?

Ans: IGNOU assignment status will be updated in 25 days after the submission of assignment. IGNOU assignment marks will be updated before the declaration of the TEE results. If candidates find their assignment status has not been updated in so long, then they should have to contact their regional centre officials.

Ques: Where you can check IGNOU assignment marks?

Ans: Candidates can see and check their IGNOU assignment marks in the IGNOU grade card after the declaration of TEE.

Ques: What to do if IGNOU assignment status shows ‘not submitted’?

Ans: If IGNOU assignment status shows ‘not submitted’ that means you have not submitted the assignments. If you have submitted the assignments and still IGNOU assignment status shows ‘not submitted’ for a long time then you have contact immediately to the university officials.

Ques: What is the last date of IGNOU assignment?

Ans: IGNOU assignment last date was 15th Feb 2020 for Session But now University has extended the last date till 15th feb 2020. Candidates should have to submit the IGNOU assignment before Feb 2020.

Ques: What does IGNOU assignment status 2020 show?

Ans: IGNOU assignment status shows whether the assignment has been accepted or rejected by IGNOU . It shows 3 types of status received, marked or rejected. IGNOU assignments are rejected due to some reasons which are discussed above.

Ques: Which Documents should you keep after the IGNOU assignment submission?

Ans: Students should have to ask for the signed slip by the HOD after submission of IGNOU Assignments. Candidates should also have to keep photocopies of their assignments. These documents will be used if IGNOU assignment status showing ‘not submitted’.

Ques: Why I have to check the IGNOU Assignment status 2020?

Ans: IGNOU Assignment is the most important part of the evaluation process. That’s why candidates have to check the IGNOU Assignment status whether it has been received, marked, accepted, or rejected. If IGNOU Assignment status shows ‘not submitted’ after submitting the IGNOU assignments then candidates have to contact regional centre immediately.

Ques: Can I submit my IGNOU Assignment any day?

Ans: Yes, Candidates can submit the IGNOU assignment any day but before the last date of IGNOU assignment which is Jan 2020.

Ques: what is the weightage of the assignments marks in final grade?

Ans: In the Final Grade card or Result, weightage of the assignments marks is 30%.

Ques: Can I submit IGNOU Assignment after the exam?

Ans: No, Candidates should have to submit the IGNOU assignment before the Term end exam and also before the deadline. It is mandatory to submit the IGNOU assignment before the Term end exam because it’s a rule or instruction of university authority. Otherwise, candidates considered as failed and do not get their degree until they qualify the final exams.

Ques: How can I score good marks in IGNOU Assignments?

Ans: As we all know IGNOU Assignments submission is the important part of qualifying a degree or diploma in IGNOU. To qualify or to get good marks in IGNOU Assignments just follow some important points or suggestions while writing your assignments:

Study the IGNOU study materials before you start writing your assignments.
Write your assignments in your handwriting which help you to score good marks/grades in the term end examination.
Should have to complete your assignments on time which allows you to appear in TEE.
Used A4 size white (xerox) paper to write the assignments and then staple all pages.
Write your answers in only Frontpage.
Write your answers in good handwriting and do not overwrite any answer or questions.
Candidates are write their answer minimum four to five page.
Always end your answer with a conclusion.
Never use multi-color sheets to write the assignments.
First page should be simple.
Make tables and diagrams with pencils in your assignments.
Make sure that submission of Assignment in a good format and also used stick files.
After submitting your assignments take the assignment receipt to the study center.
Always Keep a copy of your assignment.

Grade Calculator

Use this calculator to find out the grade of a course based on weighted averages. This calculator accepts both numerical as well as letter grades. It also can calculate the grade needed for the remaining assignments in order to get a desired grade for an ongoing course.

Final Grade Calculator

Use this calculator to find out the grade needed on the final exam in order to get a desired grade in a course. It accepts letter grades, percentage grades, and other numerical inputs.

Related GPA Calculator

The calculators above use the following letter grades and their typical corresponding numerical equivalents based on grade points.

Brief history of different grading systems

In 1785, students at Yale were ranked based on "optimi" being the highest rank, followed by second optimi, inferiore (lower), and pejores (worse). At William and Mary, students were ranked as either No. 1, or No. 2, where No. 1 represented students that were first in their class, while No. 2 represented those who were "orderly, correct and attentive." Meanwhile at Harvard, students were graded based on a numerical system from 1-200 (except for math and philosophy where 1-100 was used). Later, shortly after 1883, Harvard used a system of "Classes" where students were either Class I, II, III, IV, or V, with V representing a failing grade. All of these examples show the subjective, arbitrary, and inconsistent nature with which different institutions graded their students, demonstrating the need for a more standardized, albeit equally arbitrary grading system.

In 1887, Mount Holyoke College became the first college to use letter grades similar to those commonly used today. The college used a grading scale with the letters A, B, C, D, and E, where E represented a failing grade. This grading system however, was far stricter than those commonly used today, with a failing grade being defined as anything below 75%. The college later re-defined their grading system, adding the letter F for a failing grade (still below 75%). This system of using a letter grading scale became increasingly popular within colleges and high schools, eventually leading to the letter grading systems typically used today. However, there is still significant variation regarding what may constitute an A, or whether a system uses plusses or minuses (i.e. A+ or B-), among other differences.

An alternative to the letter grading system

Letter grades provide an easy means to generalize a student's performance. They can be more effective than qualitative evaluations in situations where "right" or "wrong" answers can be easily quantified, such as an algebra exam, but alone may not provide a student with enough feedback in regards to an assessment like a written paper (which is much more subjective).

Although a written analysis of each individual student's work may be a more effective form of feedback, there exists the argument that students and parents are unlikely to read the feedback, and that teachers do not have the time to write such an analysis. There is precedence for this type of evaluation system however, in Saint Ann's School in New York City, an arts-oriented private school that does not have a letter grading system. Instead, teachers write anecdotal reports for each student. This method of evaluation focuses on promoting learning and improvement, rather than the pursuit of a certain letter grade in a course. For better or for worse however, these types of programs constitute a minority in the United States, and though the experience may be better for the student, most institutions still use a fairly standard letter grading system that students will have to adjust to. The time investment that this type of evaluation method requires of teachers/professors is likely not viable on university campuses with hundreds of students per course. As such, although there are other high schools such as Sanborn High School that approach grading in a more qualitative way, it remains to be seen whether such grading methods can be scalable. Until then, more generalized forms of grading like the letter grading system are unlikely to be entirely replaced. However, many educators already try to create an environment that limits the role that grades play in motivating students. One could argue that a combination of these two systems would likely be the most realistic, and effective way to provide a more standardized evaluation of students, while promoting learning.

Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions

Aiou Services
__Admission
__Degree Form
_Book Dispatch
_Aiou Contact Number
_Date Sheet
Aiou Past Papers
Solved Assignments
Aiou Help Desk

Aiou Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020

how to check aiou assignment marks for semester autumn 2020 matric f.a.

Check Aiou Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020

Aiou Introduction:

Allama Iqbal Open University Aiou was established in May 1974 and since then it has started regular operations all over Pakistan and today it has become the most popular and has become the first largest university in Asia with many boys and The girls are enrolling and getting degrees in various subjects from them and enjoy life to join new jobs in various private and government companies based on the documents they receive from Allama Iqbal University.

Aiou assignment marks matric 2020

If you want to check Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020 Of AIOU Allam Iqbal Open University you come to the best place In this article we provide you a complete method of how to check matric F.A Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020.

Allam Iqbal Open University provides the facility for all those who interested to check the final marks of his/her assignments All interested candidates can check assignments for all books just providing few details.

1.First of interested students click on the link below

2.Select class name Matric or F.a

3.All interested students write the correct Roll Number

4.After putting roll number click on Submit

5.All details related to all books assignments marks show

Check assignment marks aiou autumn 2020

Aiou assignment marks autumn 2020 matric

Conclusion:

I hope you like the post Aiou Check Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020 share it with your friends on social media sites. For all types of aiou updates visit our official website www.aioubooks.com

Aiou assignment marks 2021

Download AIOU All BOOKS Of All Codes BED Download in PDF

AIOU Tutors Search by Roll Number 2023 Full Detail

Aiou Past Papers BA 1426 Spring 2021 English Literature

aiou admission 7
AIOU All BOOKS 8
AIOU Books 36
aiou date sheet 6
Aiou Degree Form 1
Aiou F.A books 1
Aiou Guess papers 21
Aiou matric books 1
Aiou Past Papers 1
aiou prospects 3
aiou solved assignments 50
Solved Assignments 2

Random Posts

IGNOUHelp.in

A Leading Portal for IGNOU Students

IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks & Result December 2023 (UPDATED)

IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks, and Result 2023 – Here, Students will get to know about the IGNOU Assignment Status for the most recent TEE sessions December 2023 and the previous June 2023. After taking admission to IGNOU University every student needs to get their Assignments from the nearest study centre or can download the same online from the IGNOU website. As per IGNOU Rules, all students have to compulsorily write their assignment which is given by the university and they have to solve it and submit it to the concerned study centre which is allotted to them. The Assignment must be submitted before the last or due date. If the last date of submission is passed then your assignment will be not accepted by the centre under any circumstances.

We want to inform all students that if you fail to submit your required assignment within a given time duration then you will be not permitted to attend the upcoming Term End Examination conducted by IGNOU. The assignments have a 30% weighted in your grade card while the Theory and Practical examination has a 70% weighted.

You May Also Read:

IGNOU Assignment Submission Last Date 2024
IGNOU Assignment Grade 2023
IGNOU Assignment Result 2023
IGNOU Regional Centre Contact Details
IGNOU Study Centre Contact Details

You can also read Instructions for IGNOU Assignments if you have any queries or questions at the time of writing your assignments. Candidates can collect their programme assignment questions with our latest edition of the IGNOU Assignment section. Candidates are advised to submit only the latest session assignments to the study centre.

IGNOU Assignment Status 2023

Latest Update – As we all know that the university has started to release IGNOU TEE Result for Dec 2023 session. Therfore, we hope that the IGNOU RCs across the country has also begin to update the IGNOU Assignment Status and Marks Online for the most recent TEE session Dec 2023. Therefore, candidates are advised to do check their IGNOU Assignment status regularly to get their assignment marks and results online as soon as possible.

IGNOU assignment status or marks for TEE December 2023 is now uploaded with the TEE Result December 2023 so keep checking the assignment status regularly to get your marks. If you already submitted the IGNOU Assignment for the session December 2023 to your study centre or through online or offline mode then you don’t have to wait for more time. The link to check your assignment status and marks is now updated to confirm whether it gets updated online or not. The assignment status and marks for June & December 2023 are generally updated with the TEE Result for June & December 2023 respectively.

IGNOU Assignment Status Update Process & Time

After submission of assignments through any of the available methods, the assignments go for an evaluation to the evaluator of the study centre or regional centre. Once Evaluator has successfully evaluated your assignment then they will either upload your marks directly on the IGNOU Site or it will be sent to IGNOU Delhi for updating online and thereafter it can be seen by each student to get their report. You can get your Marks, Status, Grades, and Results of your Assignments from here. Generally, IGNOU Assignment marks updating and uploading within 40 days after submission to the concerned study or regional centre.

Things to Do after Submission of IGNOU Assignment

If you have submitted your Assignments to the IGNOU Study Centre then now is time for checking your marks and status online. After the submission of assignments, it goes to the evaluation department in which IGNOU evaluators start the evaluation of each assignment solution. If only a few days have passed then we advise all students that please check their Assignment Marks and Status after three or four weeks.

Who can find IGNOU Assignment Status from here?

The students of TEE December 2023, June 2023, December 2022, and June 2022 may check the status of their IGNOU Assignments from here. The submission of IGNOU Assignment for session December 2023 was already over so candidates can now regularly check the status to get to know whether their marks are updated in the grade card or not. We also want to inform our students that the assignment marks for Dec 2023 session also get updated with TEE Result Dec 2023 so students are advised to check their assignment marks by following the given procedure.

Furthermore, The students from June 2021, December 2020, June 2020, and December 2019 session can also find their IGNOU Assignment marks and result here.

How to Check IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks & Result 2023?

Many of the students are getting confused about checking their assignment status & marks online after submission of their assignments to the study centre which they prepare with their hard work. We have made the process easier for students to find their assignment status, marks & results in one place.

The candidate just needs to click on the following link to go to the main page of the assignment status section. After coming to the section, you need to enter your 9 or 10 digit enrolment number and select your program code from the list and click on submit to get your assignment status on your screen.

Click to Check IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks, and Results

Note – IGNOU Assignment status may take some time to get updated online so candidates are requested to keep check their status regularly to find their assignment marks from here. In some cases, the study centre first evaluates the assignment, after evaluation, they send the marks to the regional centre and then the concerned authority at RC uploads the marks online which definitely takes some time.

What If IGNOU Assignment Status is Not Updated?

Sometimes the update process of IGNOU Assignment status gets delayed for an unknown reason like the evaluation of assignments is delayed in the concerned study centre or maybe the regional centre has not uploaded your assignment marks online. Candidates can wait till the declaration of the result to get updates on their assignment but if you are not able to find your assignment status or marks even after the release of the TEE Result then you need to connect with centre where you submitted your assignments.

Also Check: IGNOU Helpline Number

In most cases, candidates have to visit their IGNOU Study Centre and complain to the coordinator of centre to get updates regarding their pending assignment marks and status. Please keep a copy of the grade card and don’t forget the receipt of the assignment that you received while submitting of assignments. Once you follow the given instructions, you will get your assignment marks updated online.

Also Read: IGNOU IGRAM – Raise a Complaint

If your issue is not resolved after many attempts of visiting or contacting your RC and SC then do raise a complaint at the IGRAM portal. The grievance team will take appropriate action on your assignment work and will revert to you with the exact solution.

IGNOU Assignment Status 2023: FAQs

Q1. Is it necessary to keep track of my IGNOU Assignment Status? Answer: Yes, it is crucial to regularly monitor your assignment status.

Q2. When should I check my IGNOU Assignment Status? Answer: Allow up to a week for your assignment status to update to “Received and In Progress.”

Q3. How can I check my IGNOU Assignment Status? Answer: Candidates can check their IGNOU Assignment Status online through this page.

Q4. When are IGNOU Assignment Results or Marks typically declared? Answer: IGNOU Assignment Results or Marks are usually announced along with the term-end exam results.

Q5. Whom should I contact regarding an incomplete Assignment Status or Result? Answer: Reach out to the Study Centre or Regional Centre where you submitted your assignments for assistance.

IGNOU Percentage Calculator 2023 (December)
IGNOU Passing Marks Out of 100, 70, 50 for Exam…
IGNOU Revaluation Result December 2023 (OUT): IGNOU…
IGNOU Study Material Dispatch Status 2024 (UPDATED)
IGNOU Solved Assignment 2023-2024
IGNOU Marksheet Dispatch Status for TEE December 2023

750 thoughts on “IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks & Result December 2023 (UPDATED)”

Dear Respected Sir/Madam, I would like to inform you regarding my assignments , my 9 assignment papers has Not been update , kindly try to update my 9 papers assignment .Iam a ignou student Of English honours , Programme BAEGH , my study centre code is GarobadhaSt.Dominic Savio Mission ignou , I was submitted assignments on 18/1/2024 my enrollment number is 2005219340 , Regional centre NEHU Shillong Lemshing Mawkynrah pin code 793022

Sir,may I clear a doubt, My enrolment no 2302010240, Geetha pallipravan. January 2023 session meg result has come. But l didn’t get Assignment marks. Is it published or yet to be published? My Rc is vadakara and study center Nirmalagiri College, Kuthuparamba. waiting for your reply.

why my assignment results not declared yet

Mera roll number 2005072840 ha.main bag ki Student hun.mera bag Ka final grade card me mere ek Subject bfdi 073 Ka assignment not completed dikha rha h.jbki mere assignment me 50 me 30 marks han

Mera bhi yhi Hal h

Descriptive study of how proportioning marks determines the performance of nursing students in a pharmacology course

Sheila anne doggrell.

Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4002 Australia

Associated Data

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

In programs with higher proportions of marks allocated to ongoing assessment, the students have higher overall marks than those with a lower proportion allocated to assessment. Little or no attention has been made to how the allocation affects the academic success of students in individual courses. The purpose of this study was to determine how the allocation of marks to examinations, tutorials and an assignment affects the performance of nursing students in a pharmacology course.

For students who passed a pharmacology course (i) the marks for examinations and ongoing assessment (tutorials and/or an assignment) were compared, and (ii) regression line and correlation analysis was undertaken to determine any association between these marks. In addition, for completing students, modelling was undertaken to determine the effects of changing the allocation of marks on passing and failing rates.

Nursing students who passed a pharmacology course obtained significantly lower marks in examinations than ongoing assessment, and for the ongoing assessment, lower marks in the assignment than tutorials. Regression line analysis showed that the marks in ongoing assessment (tutorials and/or the assignment) versus examination marks were a poor line-fit. The correlation coefficients between ongoing assessment and examinations were weak to moderate. A high percentage of students passed the course (> 90%) and, modelling for completing students, showed that decreasing the marks for examination would have led to slightly more students passing the pharmacology course with higher grades. In contrast, increasing the marks for examination would have dramatically decreased the number of students passing the course, and their grades.

Conclusions

The allocation of marks can have a major effect on student performance. As ongoing assessment is only a weak or moderate indicator of performance in examination this has implications for students who rely on passing examinations for their advancement. For instance, nursing students in some countries (e.g. USA) are required to pass examinations prior to registration, whereas in others (e.g. Australia) they are not. Consideration needs to be given as to whether it is appropriate for nursing students who fail examinations to pass courses/programs.

Historically, examinations, which students had no prior access to, were the most common way to determine academic performance for students. However, over the last 40 years, ongoing assessment (coursework) has been introduced into many degrees [ 1 ], so that most courses have become a mixture of examination and ongoing assessment. Presently, examinations are often used to test the assimilation of knowledge and ensure that the students complete the work themselves [ 1 ]. However, due to time pressures, examinations do not allow academic excellence whereas ongoing assessment is used to teach as well as test [ 1 ].

There are no rules about the proportional allocation of marks for ongoing assessment and examination, and the allocation is often made on a seemingly arbitrary basis and not justified. For instance, in pharmacology courses for nurses in Australia, the proportion of marks for examinations ranges from 40 to 80% [ 2 – 6 ]. The consequences of the proportional allocation of marks in courses are often not considered.

Assessment can either be summative, which evaluates student learning at the end of the component or course, or formative, which monitors students learning to provide ongoing feedback. Whereas examinations are clearly summative, ongoing assessment can be either summative or formative. One of the reasons for this is that ongoing assessment takes many forms including weekly quizzes, homework, tutorials, laboratory work, oral or poster presentations, and assignments/research projects [ 7 ]. Some of these ongoing assessment types are examples of formative activities e.g. weekly quizzes and homework, whereas others are summative e.g. final presentations and final reports [ 8 ].

There is evidence that the marks for ongoing assessment are higher than for examinations, and this has various consequences. Across UK universities, in the programs with higher proportions of ongoing assessment, students had higher overall marks, and consequently better degrees, than those with a lower proportion of ongoing assessment [ 9 – 11 ]. This also applies to students in biology/molecular sciences having higher marks in courses with 100% assessment, compared to courses with mixed assessment [ 12 ].

There have been few studies of the association between marks in ongoing assessments and examination in single programs or courses. Studies have shown that the marks for ongoing assessment were higher than examination marks in a pharmacy program [ 13 ] and in a bioscience course [ 14 ]. However, it is not known whether this applies to all kinds of ongoing assessment versus examinations, and to all students and courses/programs.

The relationship between marked examinations and formative unmarked ongoing assessment has been considered in meta-analysis. This meta-analysis was of the effect of active learning interventions on examination outcomes in the STEM disciplines and showed that the interventions improved examination marks by 6%, and reduced failure rates compared to traditional lecturing [ 15 ]. The interventions were unmarked formative activities such as worksheets or tutorials completed during class [ 15 ]. Notably, formative activity that was marked, such as worksheets/homework completed prior to tutorials/workshops, were not included in this meta-analysis.

There have been few studies of the relationship between marked formative or summative ongoing assessment and marks in examinations, and these have had varying outcomes. In a pharmacy program, there was only a weak correlation between the marks for ongoing assessment and examinations and no correlation between the marks for a practical write-up and an aligned examination question [ 13 ]. In contrast, marks for home assignments were a strong predictor of examination performance in courses in calculus and macroeconomics [ 16 ], and education [ 17 ]. Marks for home assignments in statistics were shown to predict examination performance in one study [ 18 ], but not another [ 16 ]. Other studies have shown that marked tutorial-based assessments have a significant positive association with examination performance in finance [ 19 ] and law [ 20 ] courses. Marked online quizzes were also associated with better performance in examinations for education students [ 17 ].

Being able to perform well in examinations is especially important for nursing students as it may determine whether they can practice clinically. There are differences in how nursing registration is achieved between countries. In the USA and Canada, it is the marks in national examinations taken after completing their studies, which determines whether the students can practice. In contrast, Australia, the UK, the Republic of Ireland, and New Zealand are among the countries not requiring national examination prior to registration for nursing students but relying on graduation from courses with examinations and ongoing assessment.

Research questions and hypothesise

(i) Do nursing students have higher marks in ongoing assessment than examinations? The hypothesis was that they would.
(ii) Do marks in ongoing assessment predict marks in examination? The hypothesis was that they would not.
(iii) Does allocating higher proportions of marks to ongoing assessment increase pass rates? The hypothesis was that allocating higher proportions of marks to ongoing assessment was associated with higher marks and pass rates, and vice-versa.
(i) To compare the academic performance of students who passed the course in ongoing assessment and examinations.
(ii) To determine whether performance in ongoing assessment was a predictor of performance in examinations.
(iii) To consider how proportioning marks, between ongoing assessment and examinations, affected the overall marks and pass rates for the passing and failing students.

This study was of nursing students in a pharmacology course. The study was repeated in a second semester and second year to determine whether the findings were consistent and ongoing.

Study design

This is a descriptive study of the relationship between mark allocation to examinations and ongoing assessment (an assignment and/or tutorials) and the academic performance of nursing students in a pharmacology course.

Research setting

The research was undertaken in an Australian university, where students are typically required to achieve an overall mark of 50% to pass a course and passing grades are 4 (overall mark, 50–64%), 5 (65–74%), 6 (75–84%) and 7 (≥ 85%). Thus, in the pharmacology course, students with < 50% of the overall marks failed the course.

Course details

In the pharmacology course, 40% of the total marks were allocated to ongoing assessment, which had two components; tutorials and an assignment, both of which were allocated 20% of the marks. The tutorials were both formative and summative and were held weekly in classes of 25 students divided into groups of 5. Prior to the tutorials, the students were given a worksheet, which related to the lecture content for the week before the tutorial. Half of the tutorial marks were given for the completed worksheet, marked at the tutorial. The worksheet preparation was unsupervised and could be undertaken alone or in groups. The other half of the tutorial marks was a group mark for performance at the tutorial, which included questioning by the tutor of individuals and the group about the content of the student preparation.

The second 20% of the ongoing assessment was a summative written case-study assignment undertaken outside of class. This case study was an extension of the lecture content in medicines for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. It was a series of questions relating to a case of a person with complex cardiovascular and diabetic issues requiring short/essay answers.

The first part of the course was of principles of pharmacology and the second part was of systematic pharmacology. There were two examinations to make up the 60% for examinations. Firstly, there was a mid-semester examination covering the principles (20% multiple choice questions MCQs, 5% Short Answer Questions) and, secondly, there was a final examination of systematic pharmacology (35% MCQs).

The pharmacology course, taken by nursing students in the semesters of 2014 and 2015, had the same content and teacher. In both years, the pharmacology course enrolled ~ 250 students in semester 1 and ~ 360 students in semester 2, and some of these students withdrew or did not complete.

Data collection procedures

The author was the coordinator of the pharmacology course, and as such had access to the Microsoft Excel sheets of the marks associated with the course. This data was starting point for the following analysis. In the analysis, P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant for both Student’s t-test and Odds ratios.

Data analysis for objective 1: comparing academic performance in ongoing assessment and examinations

For the students, who successfully passed the course, average grades ± SEM were determined. The marks for the individual components ongoing assessment (combined and separated tutorials and assignment) and examinations were totalled, the total expressed as a percentage, and then the percentages were averaged. The percentages for individuals in examinations and ongoing assessment were compared by Students paired t-test, and the percentages for different cohorts in each component of the assessment were compared by Students unpaired t-test. Mean values were also determined.

Data analysis for objective 2: regression line analysis for the passing students to determine whether performance in ongoing assessment was a predictor of performance in examinations

Regression line analysis was undertaken using Microsoft Excel. Thus, the marks for individual students in examinations were plotted against their marks in ongoing assessment (combined and separated tutorials and assignment). The equation for the regression line (y = ax + b), where ‘a’ is the slope of the line, and the R 2 values were also given. In regression, the R 2 coefficient of determination is a statistical measure of how well the regression line approximates the real data points, with an R 2 of 1 indicating the regression line perfectly fits the data. To determine the strength of the association, the Pearson’s correlation (r) was determined and coefficients of 0–0.19 were considered very weak, 0.2–0.39 weak, 0.4–0.59 moderate, 0.6–0.79 strong, 0.8–1.0 very strong [ 21 ].

For all the students who completed the course (i.e. successful and failing students), modelling was undertaken to determine the effect of changing the marking proportions from 40% ongoing assessment/60% examinations had on the pass/failure rates and overall grades. The proportions modelled were changed to (i) 60% for ongoing assessment and 40% for examinations, (ii) 80% assessment /20% examination, (iii) 100% assessment /0% examination, (iv) 20% assessment/80% examination and (v) 0% assessment/100% examination. Mean values ± SEM were determined. Students who achieved less than 50% in the ongoing assessment or examinations were considered to have failed that component for both the actual and modelled data.

Data analysis for objective 3: how proportioning marks, between ongoing assessment and examinations, affected the overall marks and pass rates for the passing and failing students

Students who achieved less than 50% in the ongoing assessment or examinations were considered to have failed that component; failure rates for each component were compared by Odds ratio using the online Odd ratio calculator; https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php .

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained for this project from the Human Research Ethics Committee (UHREC) at Queensland University of Technology; Ethics Approval Number 1900000541. The UHREC is constituted and operates in accordance the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) and registered by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Under this approval, consent from individual students was waived. Student anonymity was achieved by removing names and students’ IDs from the marks data prior to the study.

For completing students, the passing rate was > 90% and the failure rate was < 10% (Table 1 ).

Actual and modelled data of overall marks, grades and passing/failing percentages

a Additional students passing of the completing students who had failed (% passing of completing students)

b Addition students failing of the completing students (% failing of completing students)

Mark values are the mean ± SEM (number of students)

Comparison of marks for examinations and ongoing assessment for passing students

The average grade at ~ 4.8 (Table (Table1) 1 ) and examination marks at 58–60% (Table 2 ) were similar between years and cohorts. There were only small variations between semesters for ongoing assessment (Table (Table2). 2 ). Students in each cohort obtained significantly lower marks, ~ 15–20% point difference, in examinations than ongoing assessment (Table (Table2). 2 ). Dividing the ongoing assessment showed that students obtained significantly lower marks, 9–19% point difference, in assignments than in tutorials (Table (Table2 2 ).

For students who passed the course, percentage marks for examinations and ongoing assessment

Each value is the mean ± SEM (number of students)

Unpaired t-test is between semesters 1 and 2

Paired t-tests are between examinations and ongoing assessment marks, and between tutorial and assignment marks

Despite passing the pharmacology course overall by obtaining ≥50% of the total marks available, some of these students failed the individual components, by obtaining < 50%. Thus, the failure rates for the examinations ranged from 19 to 26% (Table 3 ). These examination failure rates for examinations were much higher than for the ongoing assessment; 0–1.6% (Table (Table3). 3 ). None of the students who passed the pharmacology course failed the tutorial component. Thus, the failure rates in ongoing assessment were due to failure in the assignment component, which ranged from 3 to 6% (Table (Table3 3 ).

For students who passed the course, failure rates in examinations and ongoing assessment

Odds ratios are between examinations and ongoing assessment

Failure rates were number of student with less than 50%/total number of students who passed the unit (percentages)

For the passing students, regression line analysis and Pearson’s correlation coefficients

Regression line analysis was undertaken to determine whether performance in ongoing assessment was a good predictor of performance in the examinations. A good correlation would be indicated by the slopes of ~ 1 and R 2 values would also be ~ 1. However, as students obtained significantly lower marks in examinations than in ongoing assessment (Table (Table2), 2 ), it was predicted that there would be a poor fit of the data in regression line analysis, and this was the case (Fig. 1 , Table 4 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12912_2020_506_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Regression analysis between the percentage marks in examinations and ongoing assessment in semester 1 of 2014 (top) and 2015 (bottom). The equation for the fitted line, and the R 2 value are given on each graph

For students who passed the course, values from linear regression of examinations vs ongoing assessment

Values given are slopes, R 2 values and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (n) = number of students who passed the course

Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed there was a weak correlation between the marks for examinations and ongoing assessment for three of the four semesters, and a moderate correlation for the other seminar (seminar 1 in 2014); Table Table4. 4 . Dividing the ongoing assessment into tutorials or assignment marks also showed a poor line-fit to examination data to a line (Table (Table4). 4 ). The correlations between tutorial and examination marks were weak, and between the assignment and examinations, very weak to moderate (Table (Table4 4 ).

Modelling changing the proportional allocation of marks between ongoing assessment and examinations

The modelling changing the allocation of marks, from ongoing assessment to examinations and vice-versa, gave consistent results for all four cohorts of nursing students. Decreasing the allocation of marks to examinations increased the number of students who would have passed the course (Table 1 ). As the passing rates in the course were high (≥ 92%), there was little possibility of increasing these rates, and the modelling only resulted in a maximum of 2–6 percentage point increases (Table (Table1). 1 ). Conversely, increasing the allocation of marks to examinations would have dramatically increased the number of students who failed the course (Table (Table1). 1 ). The failure rates were low (≤ 8%) and were increased up to a maximum of 12–17 percentage points in the modelling (Table (Table1 1 ).

The three major findings of this study of nursing students in a pharmacology course are that for the passing students (i) marks are higher for ongoing assessment than examinations and (ii) there are very weak to moderate relationships between marks obtained in examination and ongoing assessment, and for completing students (iii) increasing the marks allocated to examinations decreased the number of students who passed the course, whereas decreasing the examination marks increased the number of students passing.

Marks are higher for ongoing assessment than examinations

This is the first study to show that marks for ongoing assessment are higher than for examinations for nursing students in a pharmacology course. Similar findings have been made previously for bioscience courses being undertaken by nursing students [ 22 ] or science students [ 14 ] and confirms previous findings of higher marks for ongoing assessment at the program level [ 9 – 12 ].

There are several possible reasons for this disparity between marks in examinations and ongoing assessment. The most obvious of these is that the examination results represent those of the individual student, whereas the ongoing assessment marks may represent that of individuals or groups of students. In the present study, the tutorial mark of 20% is partly a group mark and is composed of 10% for unsupervised preparation/homework, which can be individual or group, and 10% for participation, which is a group mark. This makes it possible that the performance of weak students, and their marks in tutorials, to be artificially enhanced by better students in the group. The assignment component of the ongoing assessment (20%) should represent work undertaken by the individual student, but as this was unsupervised, there was nothing preventing students colluding. One way to overcome this would be to remove group work from courses. However, it is well known that group work is very important skill for nursing students. Thus, we need to be able to overcome this ongoing problem with assessing individuals in group work [ 23 , 24 ] or use an alternative approach to make sure that students do not pass courses based on the work done by others in ongoing assessment.

For group assignments, self- and peer-rating has been used to overcome varying contributions by students in the humanities [ 25 ] and in postgraduate nursing/midwifery studies [ 26 ]. However, this method is not usually applied to weekly tutorials for students, including nursing students. When it was applied to problem-based learning tutorials for medical students, it was shown that self-ratings did not correlate, and peer- ratings only weakly correlated, with tutor-ratings of the students [ 27 ]. Thus, it is not proven that this method gives a reliable outcome of the student’s achievements in weekly tutorials. Furthermore, it would be very time consuming and expensive to undertake such assessment for weekly hourly tutorials in a large cohort. For instance, the pharmacology tutorials for nursing students in the present study were weekly over 13 weeks, in groups of 25, for cohorts of 250 or 350 students. Thus, self- and peer-ratings of tutorials are not routinely undertaken for large groups on a regular basis.

In the pharmacology course, 55% of the 60% of the marks allocated to examinations were in the form of MCQs. When MCQs are used, the fairest option is to focus on the number of questions attempted and penalize wrong answers, as with this option, blind guessing will on average not help the student [ 28 ]. Many universities, including the one that this study was undertaken at, do not deduct marks for incorrectly answered MCQs, and this inflates the MCQ marks [ 28 ]. In the pharmacology course studies, this could have inflated the marks for MCQs by ~ 20% and the overall mark in in the examination by 11% of the 60% of marks. Thus, the students who fail the examination in pharmacology by achieving less than 30% of the 60% of marks available are clearly demonstrating a poor knowledge of pharmacology, especially as the some of the marks may be due to blind guessing.

Performance in ongoing assessment is a very weak to moderate predictor of performance in exams

In this study, we showed that for nursing students in pharmacology, marks in a written assignment were very weak to moderate predictors of performance in examinations. A previous study showed a weak correlation (like this study, using Pearson’s coefficient) between marks in a research project and the final examination in a pharmacy course [ 13 ]. It would be of interest to know whether this finding relating to assignments/projects applies to students in other disciplines.

In addition, the present study showed that marks in tutorials, which included a homework component, are not good predictors of academic performance in examinations. This is the first time that this has been shown for nursing students or in a pharmacology course. However, this finding is not consistent for all disciplines, as marked tutorials have been shown to improve marks for courses in calculus, macroeconomics [ 16 ], finance [ 17 ], and law [ 20 ].

Altering the marks allocated to examinations changed the number of students who failed or passed

Increasing the marks allocated to examinations increased the number of students who failed the course and decreased the number who passed. With the allocation of marks of 60% to examinations and 40% to ongoing assessment, in the present study, the number of students who failed the pharmacology course was low (5–8%). With this low failure rate, the likelihood of increasing the passing rate by changing the allocation of marks was low, and our modelling confirmed this by showing that the passing rate could only be increased by 2–6 percentage points by increasing the marks allocated to ongoing assessment. With this allocation, the passing rate was high, 92–95%, and this occurred despite 20–26% of students failing the examination component of the course.

The major finding of the modelling part of our study was to show that increasing the marks allocated to examinations would have decreased the number of students who passed the course in pharmacology, with 19–25% failing overall if all the marks had been allocated to the examination. In Australia, the allocation of marks for examination in pharmacology or pharmacology-related courses from nursing programs ranges is variable (85%, University of Adelaide; 70%, University of Queensland; 50%, Edith Cowan University, RMIT University; 40% University of Tasmania [ 2 – 6 ]). Thus, if the standard trend of there being higher marks in ongoing assessment than examination occurs in these courses, for the same marks in ongoing assessment and examinations, a smaller percentage of students enrolled at Adelaide where examination marks predominate, would have been successful than if they had been enrolled at Tasmania, where marks for ongoing assessment predominates.

Although our modelling was done for a pharmacology course, the findings will apply to any course where the students have weaker outcomes in examinations than ongoing assessment, which is common [ 10 – 13 ]. As, to our knowledge, there are no previous studies of the either the relationship between marks in examination and ongoing assessment in an individual course, or of modelling the effect of changing the allocation of marks, for nursing or other students, these are novel findings.

Implications of these results

As marks are higher for ongoing assessment than examinations, the concern is that the nursing students, who pass the ongoing assessment by obtaining 50% of the allocated marks, but not the examinations, may not have assimilated the necessary knowledge in pharmacology or other courses, to continue their program of study. Thus, the disparity between marks in examinations and ongoing assessment needs to be considered, and methods introduced to overcome this. One possible practical solution to this dilemma of whether students who pass ongoing assessment but fail examination, should be allowed to pass courses and progress in their studies, would be to make it compulsory for the students to pass the examination component of the course.

These findings have implications for those countries (Australia, UK, Republic of Ireland, New Zealand) where performance in undergraduate ongoing assessment is partly used to determine whether nursing students/graduates go on to clinical practice. In Australia, assessment for nursing students is commonly a mixture of ongoing assessment and examinations to give a Grade Point Average (GPA), and for many nursing courses/programs, most marks are from ongoing assessment. Thus, in the present nursing program at the university where the present study was undertaken there are 23 compulsory and one elective course. Seven of the courses are off-campus (practicums) and are marked as satisfactory or not satisfactory. Of the remaining 16 compulsory courses, 8 have no examinations, and 78% of marks are allocated to ongoing assessment and only 22% to examinations. It seems likely that the number of students who failed the examination components in our Australian university but passed the program overall, would have failed the NCLEX-RN examinations in USA system and not have been registered. Further consideration needs to be given as to whether students in Australia, who do not undertake or fail examinations, are fit to practice.

One possible practical solution to this dilemma of whether students who pass ongoing assessment but fail examination, should be allowed to pass courses and progress in their studies, would be to make it compulsory for the students to pass the examination component of the course. In addition, studies need to be undertaken that consider the relationship between success in undergraduate courses and clinical practice. Another practical solution is to adopt the system used in the USA, where after completion of an undergraduate course in nursing, success in a national examination, NCLEX-RN, is a requirement for clinical practice.

Limitations

A limitation of this study is that it only used basic statistical analysis with Microsoft Excel, and more complex analysis could have been undertaken with other statistical packages (STATA, R, SPSS). However, the major limitation of this study is that it is of a single course in pharmacology, and that some of the findings may not relate to other courses being undertaken by nursing or non-nursing students. However, we have previously shown a similar reliance of marks in ongoing assessment for the overall success of nursing students in a bioscience course [ 22 ]. Also, the findings of the present study may apply to any course where students obtain significantly lower marks in examinations than ongoing assessment. However, for many courses, we do not know whether marks are lower for examinations than ongoing assessment for nursing or non-nursing students. Thus, similar analysis needs to be undertaken of other courses to determine whether the findings are specific to science courses for nursing students or can be related to other courses for nursing and non-nursing students.

More attention needs to be given to the allocation of marks between ongoing assessment and examinations. Marks in ongoing assessment may be a poor indicator of success in examinations. Students can fail the examination component by obtaining 50% or less in the examination, but pass the course, and increasing the marks allocated to ongoing assessment accentuates this finding. Students, who pass the course but not the examinations, may not have assimilated the necessary knowledge to continue in their program. Additionally, some of the passing students may have passed overall due to work done by others in ongoing assessment. It is suggested that it should be compulsory for the students to pass the examination component of the course.

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations, author’s contributions.

SAD is the sole author and was responsible for the conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript. SAD is the only writer of the submitted version and has approved submission and is personally accountable for it. SAD is the corresponding author.

Availability of data and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Human Research Ethics Committee at Queensland University of Technology (UHREC); Ethics Approval Number 1900000541. The UHREC is constituted and operates in accordance the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) and registered by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Under this approval, consent from individual students was waived.

Consent for publication

Manuscript does not have details relating to individuals.

Competing interests

No competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich marks 1 year in Russian prison

Gershkovich is being held on spying charges the U.S. denounced as false.

LONDON -- Friday marks a year since Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich was arrested in Russia. The first American reporter to be imprisoned by Moscow since the Cold War, he remains trapped in jail while the United States struggles to find a deal with Russia to free him.

Gershkovich, 32, has now spent 12 months in Moscow's Lefortovo Prison on espionage charges that his newspaper, dozens of leading international media organizations and the U.S. government have denounced as false. He has pleaded not guilty.

The fight to free Gershkovich has become a cause championed by defenders of press freedom around the world, as well as a grueling personal battle for his family. His detention has also changed how international media cover Russia, with most leading outlets no longer basing correspondents in the country.

In an interview this week with ABC's "Good Morning America," Gershkovich's parents expressed hope that the Biden administration‘s efforts to have their son released, saying from prison he is also striving to keep their spirits up.

PHOTO: Mikhail Gershkovich and Ella Milman, parents of detained Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich as well as Emma Tucker, Editor-in-Chief of The Wall Street Journal speak with George Stephanopoulos during an interview with ABC News.

"I think if you let the pessimism in ... the game is over," Ella Millman, Gershkovich's mother, told George Stephanopoulos in the interview. "And our saying in the family is we're moving forward. Moving forward.”President Joe Biden has said bringing Gershkovich home is a top priority, and his administration has indicated it is continuing to negotiate with Russia to try to find a deal to release him.Gershkovich, who had worked as a journalist in Russia for several years and was accredited by the Russian foreign ministry, was detained by the FSB domestic intelligence agency last March while on a reporting trip in the city of Yekaterinburg. FSB officers seized him as he sat in a steak restaurant.

Since then, he has been kept mostly in a two-person cell in Lefortovo, a former KGB jail, awaiting trial. A court this week extended his pretrial detention for a fifth time. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison.

A native of New Jersey, Gershkovich worked for The New York Times as a news assistant before moving to Russia in 2017 to work first for The Moscow Times and later Agence France-Presse. His parents were Soviet Jewish émigrés, who left Russia in 1979, and Gershkovich grew up speaking Russian, later becoming fascinated with the country. He joined the Wall Street Journal in January 2022.

"Our main focus at the Journal has been to keep Evan's story front and of mind, to remind people that an innocent journalist is behind bars, in prison of doing his job," the Journal's editor-in-chief Emma Tucker said in the "GMA" interview.

Gershkovich is one of several Americans seized by Russia in recent years -- among them the WNBA star Brittney Griner -- as part of an apparently intensifying campaign of hostage-taking. A former Marine, Paul Whelan, has been imprisoned since 2018 on espionage charges the U.S. and his family say are fabricated. Another U.S. journalist, Alsu Kurmasheva, working for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, has been in detention since October, charged under a law used to censor criticism of Russia's military. Press freedom groups have condemned her arrest and joined RFE/RL in calling for her release.

Griner was released in a prisoner exchange for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout in December 2022.

PHOTO: Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich stands in a glass cage in a courtroom at the Moscow City Court, in Moscow, Russia, Dec. 14, 2023.

In recent months, Russian officials have indicated that they view Gershkovich as a bargaining chip, hoping to exchange him for Russians held in Western countries. President Vladimir Putin, in an interview in February, said he wanted a deal with the U.S. to free Gershkovich. Putin signaled he may want to trade Gershkovich for Vadim Krasikov, a Russian man jailed in Germany as an FSB assassin.

MORE: Russia open to prisoner swap for Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich: Putin

The U.S. in December said Russia had rejected an offer that would have freed Gershkovich and Whelan.

President Biden has met with Gershkovich’s parents. He mentioned Gershkovich and Whelan in his State of the Union address in March, saying, "We'll work around the clock to bring home Evan and Paul," as Gershkovich's parents sat in the audience.

"We were happy that both governments have expressed willingness to negotiate," his father, Mikhail Gershkovich, told Stephanopoulos. "We are confident that [the White House is] doing everything they can, and we want them to continue to do that."

The U.S. and the Kremlin have both indicated that talks about a deal are ongoing. Those close to the late Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny, who died in prison last month, have claimed there were discussions for a possible trade that would have freed Navalny, as well as Gershkovich and Whelan, in exchange for the Russian assassin, Krasikov.

The Wall Street Journal this week reported Biden and Germany's chancellor Olaf Scholz had discussed such a trade but that Navalny had died before it could be proposed to Putin. Navalny's team has accused Putin of killing Navalny to prevent the trade.

MORE: Friend of detained journalist Evan Gershkovich: 'We need to make sure he feels he's not alone, he's not forgotten'

Tucker, the Wall Street Journal's editor-in-chief, this week expressed confidence that a deal can still be reached.

"Evan will be released, but it's complicated to get there," she said. "There are a lot of different people and governments involved. So I think, you know, we just have to be patient, and optimistic."

The Wall Street Journal has been leading an international campaign among his colleagues and friends to keep attention on Gershkovich's case, including holding runs for him and 24-hour "read-a-thons" of his work. Time Magazine this month put Gershkovich on its front page.

Gershkovich is able to send and receive letters from prison, keeping in contact with friends and family, who say he retains his characteristic humor. He has even been arranging via others to have gifts delivered for friends' birthdays and other occasions. The Journal has encouraged people to send letters to Gershkovich via its site.

"He remembers his friends' birthdays. We received flowers from him for International Women's Day on March 8," his mother told ABC News. "He really cares. He wants to thank people for their care about him, for keeping his story front and center."

Total solar eclipse 2024: Path, time and the best places to view

Mar 29, 5:04 AM

5 dead and over 100 hospitalized from recalled Japanese health supplements

Mar 29, 3:11 AM

Tennessee politicians strip historically Black university of its board

Mar 28, 6:20 PM

Trump must 'immediately desist' from targeting judge's daughter, prosecutors say

24 minutes ago

Melissa Joan Hart reacts to 'Quiet on Set' docuseries

Mar 29, 1:03 PM

ABC News Live

24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

Assignment Marks For 1431& 1424 Autumn 2020

Wednesday, april 28, 2021, assignments marks of compulsory english-ii course code 1424(aiou), here are assignments marks of compulsory english-ii course code 1424(aiou) uploaded by tutor s.j., incase of any queries/mistakes/objections, contact your tutor before 30april 2021, note: "a" means absent/assignment not received and failed, tuesday, april 27, 2021, assignments marks of ict course code 1431(aiou), note: a means absent/assignment not received and failed.

Assignments Marks of Compulsory English-II Course Code 1424(AIOU) Here are Assignments Marks of Compulsory English-II Course Code 1424(AIOU)...

Ethics & Leadership
Fact-Checking
Media Literacy
The Craig Newmark Center
Reporting & Editing
Ethics & Trust
Tech & Tools
Business & Work
Educators & Students
Training Catalog
Custom Teaching
For ACES Members
All Categories
Broadcast & Visual Journalism
Fact-Checking & Media Literacy
In-newsroom
Memphis, Tenn.
Minneapolis, Minn.
St. Petersburg, Fla.
Washington, D.C.
Poynter ACES Introductory Certificate in Editing
Poynter ACES Intermediate Certificate in Editing
Ethics & Trust Articles
Get Ethics Advice
Fact-Checking Articles
International Fact-Checking Day
Teen Fact-Checking Network
International
Media Literacy Training
MediaWise Resources
Ambassadors
MediaWise in the News

Support responsible news and fact-based information today!

Newsletters

Opinion | Wall Street Journal marks one year of reporter’s detainment in Russian jail

Evan Gershkovich was arrested a year ago today in Russia while on a reporting assignment for the Journal

Good morning. First, an update on the newsletter . There will be no Poynter Report on Monday. My colleagues will handle the newsletter next Tuesday, and I will return to see you all again on Wednesday.

And now onto today’s Poynter Report, with an opening item written by my colleague, Angela Fu.

Today, images of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich will run in several prominent news outlets. Emblazoned across some, a promise: “We’ll Keep Telling Evan’s Story. Until He Can Tell His Own.”

It’s the culmination of a weeklong effort by The Wall Street Journal to mark the one-year anniversary of Gershkovich’s detainment in Russia. On March 29, 2023, Russian officials arrested Gershkovich, 32, while he was on a reporting assignment and charged him with espionage. Gershkovich, The Wall Street Journal and the United States government have all denied the charges, but he continues to be held in a Moscow prison, uncertain of when he will face trial.

“This is a full-frontal assault on the free press,” said Wall Street Journal assistant editor Paul Beckett. “The charge he faces is totally bogus. We haven’t seen any evidence or been presented with a shred of anything that would explain what they thought he was doing that leads to the false charges they filed against him.”

On the night of Gershkovich’s arrest, Beckett, the Journal’s Washington, D.C., bureau chief at the time, contacted the State Department, National Security Council, Pentagon and other institutions to report Gershkovich missing. By October, Beckett had transitioned to a new role to work on Gershkovich’s case full time. His work involves multiple fronts: supporting Gershkovich and his family, keeping Wall Street Journal employees updated on Gershkovich’s situation, talking to people in Washington about strategies to bring Gershkovich home, and creating awareness campaigns.

Lawyers for The Wall Street Journal and parent company Dow Jones are working most directly to negotiate Gershkovich’s release, Beckett said. “But we believe that keeping Evan front-of-mind will help those negotiations and hopefully help them end faster.”

The latest awareness campaign started last weekend with “Swim for Evan” events at 10 beaches named Brighton across the world. (Gershkovich used to regularly visit the Brighton beaches in New York and England.) On Wednesday, more than 200 people attempted to symbolically cover the 4,707 miles that separate Moscow from Gershkovich’s hometown of Princeton, New Jersey, in a dozen different “Run for Evan” events. And throughout the week, major publications in the U.S. and the U.K. ran editorials and feature stories about Gershkovich’s detainment .

The front page of The Wall Street Journal for Friday, March 29, features a large blank space to honor the work of Evan Gershkovich, who has been detained in Russia for a year. (Courtesy: Wall Street Journal)

Reporters across major outlets also came together Wednesday for a 24-hour “Read-A-Thon” of Gershkovich’s work. Along with Gershokivch’s friends and colleagues, prominent journalists including CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins, ABC News anchor David Muir, Fox News anchor Brett Baier, Washington Post executive editor Sally Buzbee, Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, New Yorker editor David Remnick and New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor read Gershkovich’s reporting aloud.

“I think it’s easy for it to be lost on people what the impact for democracy and journalism is for Evan to be detained,” said Wall Street Journal reporter Caitlin Ostroff, who helped organize the event. “When I was printing out Evan’s stories for the Read-A-Thon and putting together the massive binders that we have of them, I was completely awestruck by how much he has done — how many different types of topics, people, regions he has covered.”

Gershkovich, the son of Soviet Union immigrants, started his journalism career at The New York Times before working for The Moscow Times and Agence France-Presse. He joined The Wall Street Journal in January 2022 and helped cover the Russia-Ukraine war. Gershkovich was working in Yekaterinburg with press credentials from Russia’s foreign ministry when he was arrested.

“He had just a great interest in Russian culture, people and society, in addition to all the usual things a foreign correspondent covers in terms of the government and economy. He really took to Russia and loves the country, loves covering the Russian people. That’s the kind of reporter he was,” said Beckett, who worked with Gershkovich when he was D.C. bureau chief. “Some foreign correspondents will go and just hobnob with expats and embassy people. He went and dived right in.”

On Wednesday, a Russian judge extended Gershkovich’s detention by three months, The Wall Street Journal reported . It was the fifth time Gershkovich’s detention has been extended, and it is unclear when his case will reach trial. In the meantime, he is being kept in the infamous Lefortovo prison, where he spends 23 hours a day in his cell.

“And yet he has been reading. He has been exercising. He has been writing letters, doing yoga, finding ways to maintain his equilibrium, and we’re really grateful for that,” Beckett said. “He’s clearly an extraordinary young man.”

Gershkovich’s colleagues said they hope the week’s awareness campaign will inspire people to learn more about him and his situation. The Wall Street Journal maintains a page with information and resources regarding Gershkovich’s case, and readers can write messages to him and his family .

“He should be here,” said Ostroff, who met and befriended Gershkovich while she was working at The Wall Street Journal’s London bureau. “He should be annoyingly taller than me, looking down, laughing at my antics. And he’s not.

“But what keeps me going is honestly just random people who take an interest. … Each new person that we’re able to reach is a victory. Even if those individual people don’t think they can do much, even them just knowing Evan’s name is so much.”

And now media news, tidbits and interesting links for your weekend review …

The Atlantic has surpassed 1 million subscribers and is now profitable, according to a note to staff from editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg and CEO Nicholas Thompson. In a release , The Atlantic says, “Overall revenue is up more than 10 percent year over year; advertising booked year-to-date is also up 33 percent year over year. Subscriptions to The Atlantic have increased by double-digit percentages in each of the past four years –– and surged 14 percent in the past year. The Atlantic has more than doubled the total number of paid subscriptions since it launched digital and a digital + print bundle four years ago.” In addition, The Atlantic reported it has earned Pulitzer Prizes each of the past three years.
Wall Street Journal media reporter Isabella Simonetti tweeted Thursday that former Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, who was cut loose by NBC News as a contributor after internal backlash, is drawing interest from Newsmax — the conservative TV network.
Variety’s Brian Steinberg with “TV Talkers From Pat McAfee to Rachel Maddow Gain New License to Blast Bosses On-Air.”
The Daily Beast’s Corbin Bolies with “Karlie Kloss and a Kushner Plan to Revive Life Magazine.”
The Los Angeles Times’ Adam Tschorn with “I’m an ex-game show writer. Here’s how I make the Los Angeles Times News Quiz fun.”
From The Associated Press in collaboration with the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism programs and PBS’s “Frontline,” it’s Reese Dunklin, Ryan J. Foley, Jeff Martin, Jennifer McDermott, Holbrook Mohr and John Seewer with “Why Did More Than 1,000 People Die After Police Subdued Them With Force That Isn’t Meant To Kill?” (Here’s the link with even more from the AP .)
The New York Times’ Annie Correal, Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, Campbell Robertson, Michael Forsythe and Mike Baker with “The Five Minutes That Brought Down the Francis Scott Key Bridge.”
The Wall Street Journal’s Jason Gay with “The Eerie Agony of a Broken Bridge.”
The Washington Post’s Nitasha Tiku and Pranshu Verma with “AI hustlers stole women’s faces to put in ads. The law can’t help them.”
Awful Announcing’s Andrew Bucholtz with “Media need to realize not all sports gambling scandals are equal.”
The Ringer’s Bryan Curtis writes about one of the top sports announcers in the business who is calling this year’s Final Four: “Ladies and Gentlemen, Ian Eagle.”

More resources for journalists

Bring Poynter to Your Newsroom, Classroom or Workplace .
Poynter Producer Project (Seminar) (June 4-Sept. 10) — Apply by April 14 .
Reporter’s Toolkit (Seminar) (May 7-June 11) — Get equipped with the tools you need to be successful and receive one-on-one coaching. Apply by April 28 .
Get the edge on reporting on the eight hot topics of the 2024 election with Beat Academy (webinar series) — Rolling enrollment from now through September. Enroll today.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected] .

The Poynter Report is our daily media newsletter. To have it delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, sign up here .

A Baltimore bridge collapsed in the middle of the night and two metro newsrooms leapt into action

Coverage from The Baltimore Sun and The Baltimore Banner had much in common but with some marked differences — especially in visuals.

Private equity reporting grants show good return

Projects in Hawaii, Milwaukee and south central Indiana knit news organizations into community life

Opinion | How misinformation will be gender-based in Ghana’s upcoming elections

Fact-checkers must be on the lookout for narratives that target and diminish women candidates

Opinion | The bombing of Erbil is a case study in misinformation

Real events spawn online fabrications, making data analysis an important tool for truth

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Start your day informed and inspired.

Get the Poynter newsletter that's right for you.

Tuesday rally marks Donald Trump's eighth visit to Green Bay area. Look back at earlier visits

GREEN BAY - As former President Donald Trump holds a rally Tuesday in Green Bay, it will be his first visit to the area in four years.

The event will be Trump's first rally in Wisconsin for the 2024 presidential election. He will speak Tuesday evening at the KI Convention Center in downtown Green Bay. He was in Waukesha County in 2022 to campaign for Tim Michels before the Republican gubernatorial primary.

His rally Tuesday marks his eighth appearance in Green Bay area and first one in four years.

His first appearance in the city goes back 15 years before he was elected president. Here's a look at Trump's previous stops in Green Bay.

Trump makes an appearance with WWE

Seven years before he was elected president, Trump visited Green Bay as the new owner of "Monday Night RAW." He flew into Green Bay Austin Straubel International Airport on June 22, 2009, for a visit for an event broadcast live at the Resch Center with six World Wrestling Entertainment Divas and an announcement that he was going to refund everyone's ticket for the event.

Trump gains support with three visits in 2016, including two at KI center

Trump came back to Green Bay as a Republican presidential candidate in 2016. He made a campaign stop for a town hall on March 30, 2016, at St. Norbert College in De Pere a couple weeks ahead of the April presidential primary that year. He followed the St. Norbert town hall with an invitation-only town hall at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, hosted by former MSNBC host Chris Matthews. He ended the day with a rally in Appleton with 1,000 supporters.

Between the two town halls, Trump spoke about his views on college debt, abortion, critiques of former state governor Scott Walker, and building a wall on the border with Mexico. Hundreds of Green Bay residents attended the St. Norbert Town Hall, while other students organized protests on the college campus ahead of his arrival.

He held another rally on Aug. 5, 2016, at the KI Convention Center.

He held his last Green Bay rally of the campaign on Oct. 16, 2016, when he spoke to about 3,000 people at the KI Convention Center to gain vital support with voters before the presidential election that led him to victory. He ended up winning Brown County handily in the November 2016 election.

Trump makes an early campaign stop in 2019

Three years later, Trump made an early campaign visit to the Green Bay area ahead of the 2020 presidential election where he was seeking reelection. He held a rally at the Resch Center in Ashwaubenon in April 2019 to build momentum in Wisconsin and nearby Michigan — two swing states in the presidential election.

Trump holds a town hall in Green Bay, holds rally at airport in 2020

Trump made a stop in Marinette in June 2020 during his bid for reelection. He toured Fincantieri Marinette Marine before speaking to around 700 people, mostly employees of the shipyard. He followed the tour by taping a one-hour town hall with Fox News host Sean Hannity at the Green Bay Austin Straubel International Airport.

He made another plea to voters four days before the November 2020 election at the airport, where he spoke to thousands of supporters. In the speech, he talked about restoring "law and order" and recovering the economy post-COVID.

The week after, Biden was elected president, carrying Green Bay with more votes than Trump, but Trump won Brown County overall.

More: Donald Trump to hold first Wisconsin campaign rally of 2024 in Green Bay

Contact Benita Mathew at [email protected].

CBSSports.com
Fanatics Sportsbook
CBS Sports Home
NCAA Tournament
W. Tournament
Champions League
Motor Sports
High School
Horse Racing

Men's Brackets

Women's Brackets

Fantasy Baseball

Fantasy football, football pick'em, college pick'em, fantasy basketball, fantasy hockey, franchise games, 24/7 sports news network.

CBS Sports Golazo Network
March Madness Live
PGA Tour on CBS
UEFA Champions League
UEFA Europa League
Italian Serie A
Watch CBS Sports Network
TV Shows & Listings

The Early Edge

A Daily SportsLine Betting Podcast

With the First Pick

NFL Draft is coming up!

Podcasts Home
Eye On College Basketball
The First Cut Golf
NFL Pick Six
Cover 3 College Football
Fantasy Football Today
Morning Kombat
My Teams Organize / See All Teams Help Account Settings Log Out

2024 March Madness TV schedule: How to watch NCAA Tournament, Sweet 16 live stream, tipoff times, announcers

The complete television and streaming schedule for how to watch march madness 2024.

The Sweet 16 is already down to 12 teams as the 2024 NCAA Tournament continues Friday with a second of four straight nights of action set for Friday in Dallas and Detroit. We have already seen plenty of dominant victories, shocking upsets and shining moments from this edition of March Madness, and there's eight more games to go before we hit the Final Four.

The top eight teams in the nation entering March Madness were all still alive in the Sweet 16 for just the fifth time since the NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985, but we have already seen those numbers dwindle.

On Thursday, No. 1 seed UConn blew out No. 5 seed San Diego State, marking its ninth straight double-digit March Madness win. No. 6 Clemson provided a somewhat-surprising upset out in Los Angeles, knocking off No. 2 seed Arizona in the West Regional semifinal and putting the Tigers into the Elite Eight for the first time in 44 years. No. 1 seed North Carolina went down to No. 4 seed Alabama behind a tremendous individual effort from Grant Taylor, and No. 2 seed Iowa State was ousted by No. 3 seed Illinois in a hard-fought battle

Friday's games will again be played across CBS and TBS with the best in the business bringing you the action from Dallas and Detroit. The Elite Eight then commences Saturday on TBS, continuing Sunday on CBS.

Once we get to the Final Four, you will notice veteran Ian Eagle stepping in as the lead play-by-play announcer, replacing the legendary Jim Nantz, who stepped away in 2023. Eagle will be alongside mainstays Bill Raftery, Grant Hill and reporter Tracy Wolfson on the top announcing team. A longtime staple of NCAA Tournament coverage, Eagle was not alone as someone stepping into a new role on the team. Former Purdue star Robbie Hummel called his first NCAA Tournament broadcast during the first week.

CBS and TBS are leading the way televising 21 games apiece during the NCAA Tournament, while truTV and TNT carried 13 and 12, respectively. The Final Four will simulcast across TBS and TNT. In addition to the March Madness Live app , where you can watch every game, Paramount+ subscribers will be able to watch all the games televised by CBS, while subscribers to Max's B/R Sports Add-On can catch the remainder of the games.

From the Selection Show all the way until the playing of "One Shining Moment" after a champion is crowned, CBS Sports and TNT Sports will be bringing you the magic.

Let's take a look at the 2024 March Madness announcing teams as well as the remaining schedule for the 2024 NCAA Tournament.

2024 March Madness announcing teams

Play-by-Play | Analyst(s) || Reporter * Regional Weekend announce teams

Ian Eagle | Bill Raftery, Grant Hill || Tracy Wolfson*
Brian Anderson | Jim Jackson || Allie LaForce*
Kevin Harlan | Dan Bonner, Stan Van Gundy || Andy Katz*
Andrew Catalon | Steve Lappas || Evan Washburn*
Lisa Byington | Steve Smith, Robbie Hummel || Lauren Shehadi
Spero Dedes | Jim Spanarkel || Jon Rothstein
Tom McCarthy | Deb Antonelli, Avery Johnson || AJ Ross
Brad Nessler | Brendan Haywood || Dana Jacobson

2024 NCAA Tournament schedule, dates

Friday, March 29 American Airlines Center -- Dallas (Game 1, Game 3) | Little Caesars Arena -- Detroit (Game 2, Game 4)

Elite Eight

Saturday, March 30 TD Garden -- Boston (Game 1) | Crypto.com Arena -- Los Angeles (Game 2)

Sunday, March 31 -- 2:20 p.m. start (CBS) American Airlines Center -- Dallas | Little Caesars Arena -- Detroit

Saturday, April 6 -- 6:09 p.m. start (TBS / TNT) State Farm Stadium -- Glendale, Arizona

National Championship

Monday, April 8 -- 9:20 p.m. (TBS / TNT) State Farm Stadium -- Glendale, Arizona

Our Latest College Basketball Stories

Houston vs. Duke odds, Sweet 16 picks, prediction

Cbs sports staff • 3 min read.

NIT quarterfinals: Indiana State wins, Ohio State falls

Cameron salerno • 2 min read.

Indiana vs. South Carolina: How to watch, preview

Erica ayala • 2 min read.

NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament - Second Round - Pittsburgh

Storylines, streaming info for Sweet 16 games Friday

Chip patterson • 5 min read.

2024 Women's Sweet 16: TV schedule, streaming, preview

Chris bengel • 2 min read, marquette vs. nc state odds, sweet 16 predictions, share video.

2024 NCAA Tournament: How to watch live, TV tip times

Expert picks for Sweet 16 games on Friday

Sweet 16 storylines for Friday night

UConn rolling; can Illinois keep it close?

Pack's Keatts: From hot seat to Sweet 16

Tide, Nelson stop No. 1 seed North Carolina in upset win

March Madness: NCAA Tournament TV schedule

Transfer rankings: Storr, Rice enter portal

Painter among elite coaches seeking Final Four bid

How Gonzaga saved its season, landed in Sweet 16

Workshop Marks

Helpline: 051-111-112-468

Allama Iqbal Open University, Sector H-8, Islamabad- 44000, Pakistan

AIOU Help Desk

Entertainment
Newsletters

WEATHER ALERT

A rip current statement in effect for Coastal Broward and Coastal Miami Dade Regions

Trump asks appeals court to review ruling allowing fani willis to remain on georgia election case.

Kate Brumback

Associated Press

FILE - Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis looks on during a hearing on the Georgia election interference case, Friday, March, 1, 2024, in Atlanta. An attorney for Donald Trump says hes optimistic an appellate review will lead to the Georgia 2020 election interference case against him being dismissed and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis being disqualified. (AP Photo/Alex Slitz, Pool, File)

ATLANTA – Former President Donald Trump and eight other defendants accused of illegally trying to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia on Friday submitted a formal application to appeal a judge's ruling allowing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to remain on the case.

Trump and other defendants had tried to get Willis and her office tossed off the case, saying her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade created a conflict of interest. Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee earlier this month found that there was not a conflict of interest that should force Willis off the case but said that the prosecution was “encumbered by an appearance of impropriety.”

Local 10 News @ 6PM : Mar 29, 2024

Local 10 news @ 5pm : mar 29, 2024, local 10 news @ 4pm : mar 29, 2024, local 10 news @ 3pm : mar 29, 2024, local 10 news @ noon : mar 29, 2024.

IMAGES

CBSE Board Exam Passing Marks Big Update
Allama Iqbal Open University AIOU Announced Assignments Marks 2020
Cg board Class 10th 12th October 2020 Assignment New UPDATE| BIG
Assignments Submission due Dates Autumn 2020 Semester AIOU
How to check IGNOU Assignment Marks & Status
एक Click में Assignment Status कैसे देखें?

VIDEO

moments of Internal Assignment Marks Verification Committee. GOVERNMENT PU COLLEGE, KOKATANUR
solution for assignment marks update #ignou #shot #assignment #information
NIOS
😮 IGNOU assignment marks not update problem and how to fix all detail information
UPRTOU Assignment paper Status # Assignment Status Dec -2023# Assignment paper Status #Assignment#
How To Score Passing Marks? In Business Studies Class 12th Board Exam 2020. Score 50+ Marks

COMMENTS

IGNOU GradeCard
Student Login. Grade Card Status for *. Enrolment No. *. Note: In case any student is found to be booked under unfairmeans, the result of the particular student will be Cancelled.
IGNOU Results
December 09 Exam Result. June 09 Exam Result. BHA, MHA, BAIHA Oct-09. BHM, BAIHA April-09. Dec.08 Exam Result. June 08 (for MCA/BCA/MP) June 08 (for Others Programmes) The Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), established by an Act of Parliament in 1985, has continuously striven to build an inclusive knowledge society through ...
IGNOU Results
The Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), established by an Act of Parliament in 1985, has continuously striven to build an inclusive knowledge society through inclusive education.
Assignment Marks
Allama Iqbal Open University, Sector H-8, Islamabad- 44000, Pakistan AIOU Help Desk
IGNOU
The channels has been stared with an aim to initiate new ways of learning by educating students with better and improved methods of curriculum. The Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), established by an Act of Parliament in 1985, has continuously striven to build an inclusive knowledge society through inclusive education.
Assignment
Assignments (Programme Wise) Master's Degree Programmes: Bachelor's Degree Programmmes: P.G. Diploma Programmes
IGNOU Assignment Status not Updated? Do this
Many of the RCs have now started to update the IGNOU Assignment Status and Marks Online for most recent session June 2020 so candidates are advised to do check their Assignment status regular to get their assignment marks and results as soon as possible. Your assignment status or marks for TEE June 2020 will be uploaded with the TEE June 2020 Result so keep checking the assignment status ...
Assignments Marks 2020 Semester 2 Year 2 & 3 : All Courses
Assignments Marks 2020 Semester 2 Year 2 & 3 : All Courses. Click to dowload the assignments marks. Electrical 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks. Electrical 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks. Civil 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks. Civil 3rd year 2nd Sem Assignment Marks. Mecahnical 2nd year 2nd Sem Assignment Maarks
PDF Schoology Online Gradebook -Elementary Schools, Grades K-5/6
Parents will have access to the online gradebook to view their child's class assignments and grades. Access to Schoology is available through the Parent Portal. Teachers are encouraged to enter as many assignment marks as possible in the online gradebook. The following is the minimum grade entries during the 2019-2020 school year in grades K-5/6:
IGNOU Assignment Status 2020: Dates, Submission, Marks ...
Candidates can follow the steps of Download IGNOU Grade Card to check the IGNOU Assignment result. They can check their grade card in IGNOU Student Zone to see the IGNOU Result and marks of the IGNOU assignments 2020. Visit Official Website of IGNOU. Click on Student Support and then Click on Student Zone. Then Click on Results.
Grade Calculator
Grade Calculator. Use this calculator to find out the grade of a course based on weighted averages. This calculator accepts both numerical as well as letter grades. It also can calculate the grade needed for the remaining assignments in order to get a desired grade for an ongoing course. Assignment/Exam.
PDF Clark County School District
Rev N - April 2020 -y PAGE 8 Clark County School District Employee Business Training Assignment Marks (Optional) Assignment Marks are used when entering scores for assignments created in the Infinite Campus Grade Book. By creating assignment marks, scores can be entered as a point value or as E, S, or N. Creating Assignment Marks 1.
IGNOU Assignment Status 2020 (Available)
The status of IGNOU Assignment 2020 can be checked by students who have enrolled, provided by IGNOU. ... The weightage of the assignment is 30% in your marks card, therefore those who fail to submit the assignment will not be permitted to attend the Term-End exam, held by IGNOU. 70% of the weightage is given to the practical and theory exams. ...
Aiou Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020
Check Aiou Assignment Marks for Semester Autumn 2020. Aiou Introduction: Allama Iqbal Open University Aiou was established in May 1974 and since then it has started regular operations all over Pakistan and today it has become the most popular and has become the first largest university in Asia with many boys and The girls are enrolling and getting degrees in various subjects from them and ...
IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks & Result December 2023 (UPDATED)
IGNOU Assignment Status, Marks, and Result 2023 - Here, Students will get to know about the IGNOU Assignment Status for the most recent TEE sessions December 2023 and the previous June 2023.After taking admission to IGNOU University every student needs to get their Assignments from the nearest study centre or can download the same online from the IGNOU website.
IGNOU Assignment 2024: Submission Last date, Status, Marks
The passing marks for assignments are 50% marks. It is only when candidates score these marks that the assignment status of IGNOU 2024 in the grade card will show 'completed'. IGNOU status 'not completed' means a failure in the assignment and the candidate will have to write and submit the assignments again.
Wall Street Journal marks Evan Gershkovich's 'stolen year' with somber
March 29, 2024, 10:24 AM PDT. By Clarissa-Jan Lim. One year ago, Russian authorities detained Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich while he was on assignment in Moscow. On Friday, the ...
Descriptive study of how proportioning marks determines the performance
Thus, the marks for individual students in examinations were plotted against their marks in ongoing assessment (combined and separated tutorials and assignment). The equation for the regression line (y = ax + b), where 'a' is the slope of the line, and the R 2 values were also given.
PDF 2020 Administration and IT Assignment Higher Marking Instructions
Marking Instructions. Scottish Qualifications Authority 2020. These marking instructions are prepared by examination teams for use by SQA appointed markers when marking external course assessments. Please note, as we were not able to carry out live marking in 2020, these marking instructions are not presented in a final state and have not been ...
Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich marks 1 year in Russian
Gershkovich is being held on spying charges the U.S. denounced as false. LONDON -- Friday marks a year since Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich was arrested in Russia. The first ...
Assignment Marks For 1431& 1424 Autumn 2020
Assignment Marks For 1431& 1424 Autumn 2020 Wednesday, April 28, 2021. Assignments Marks of Compulsory English-II Course Code 1424(AIOU) Assignments Marks of Compulsory English-II Course Code 1424(AIOU) Here are Assignments Marks of Compulsory English-II Course Code 1424(AIOU) Uploaded by Tutor S.J.
Assignments
Assignment Papers Assignment Papers . Online Application Form for Challenge Evaluation Online Application Form for Challenge Evaluation. Result Correction Result Correction. Result All Result All. PREV EXAMINATION PAPERS PREV EXAMINATION PAPERS. Examination Schedule Dec-2023 (Uploaded on 22-12-2023) Examination Schedule Dec-2023 (Uploaded on 22 ...
Wall Street Journal marks one year of reporter's detainment ...
Evan Gershkovich was arrested a year ago today in Russia while on a reporting assignment for the Journal ... It's the culmination of a weeklong effort by The Wall Street Journal to mark the one ...
2024 March Madness TV schedule: How to watch the NCAA Tournament
Once we get to the Final Four, you will notice veteran Ian Eagle stepping in as the lead play-by-play announcer, replacing the legendary Jim Nantz, who stepped away in 2023.
assignment marks
Assignment on Teams when giving assignment we need same facility; while evaluating after giving marks there is only one button that is "Return" is there any way we can give marks but not disclose the marks to student as we need to do other results publishing process. we need this facility very much ; current system it reveals marks immediately;
Tuesday rally marks Donald Trump's eighth visit to Green Bay area. Look
His rally Tuesday marks his eighth appearance in Green Bay area and first one in four years. ... Trump made an early campaign visit to the Green Bay area ahead of the 2020 presidential election ...
2024 March Madness TV schedule: How to watch NCAA Tournament, Sweet 16
The Sweet 16 is already down to 12 as the 2024 NCAA Tournament continues this week with a second of four straight nights of action set for Friday. We have already seen plenty of dominant victories ...
:Workshop Marks:
Allama Iqbal Open University, Sector H-8, Islamabad- 44000, Pakistan AIOU Help Desk
Trump asks appeals court to review ruling allowing Fani Willis to
Trump and 18 others were indicted in August, accused of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn his narrow 2020 presidential election loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia.